Figures (7)  Tables (1)
    • Figure 1. 

      (a) 3D printer appearance, (b) main parts, (c, d) the virtual model used during printing experiments.

    • Figure 2. 

      Gel strength of 3D printed compound products at six beeswax levels (0, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, w/w). a−f: values with different lowercase letters indicated significant difference (p < 0.05).

    • Figure 3. 

      Printing quality of 3D printed compound products at two beeswax level (a, b: 0; c, d: 3%, w/w).

    • Figure 4. 

      Rheological behavior (a: apparent viscosity; b: G', c: G'') of inks at six beeswax levels (0, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, w/w).

    • Figure 5. 

      X-ray diffractograms of inks at six beeswax levels (0, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, w/w).

    • Figure 6. 

      TGA results of the thermal decomposition and its derivative (DTG) of inks at six beeswax levels (0, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, w/w).

    • Figure 7. 

      SEM images of inks at 800x magnification with six beeswax levels (a−f: 0, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, w/w)

    • Beeswax
      (%, w/w)
      Actual height after
      30 min (mm)
      Accuracy
      (%)
      017.45 ± 0.32b87.25 ± 2.60b
      119.32 ± 0.11d96.60 ± 1.15d
      319.67 ± 0.09d98.35 ± 1.60d
      518.59 ± 0.26c92.95 ± 3.10c
      716.26 ± 0.47a81.30 ± 4.40a
      9NINI
      Different lowercase letters in the same column indicated significant differences (p < 0.05). NI, no information.

      Table 1. 

      Accuracy of the 3D printed compound products at six beeswax levels (0, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 9%, w/w). The model set height was 20 mm.