-
Variables Gross
decon†Contaminated PPE out of cab† Washing
PPE†Showering within 1 hr after firefighting† Workout within 24 hr after firefighting† Wearing SCBA during overhaul† Threat appraisal Hazard salience How often do you think about occupational cancer? 0.08 0.03 −0.02 0.01 0.01 0.07 Risk perception Occupational cancer concern 0.07 0.14 0.05 0.10 −0.07 0.11 Likelihood of cancer diagnoses −0.14 −0.12 0.04 −0.02 0.06 −0.05 Likelihood of cancer being caused by firefighting 0.02 −0.02 −0.06 −0.03 0.08 0.00 Hazard exposure Hazard exposure index 0.11 0.10 −0.06 0.01 0.00 0.02 Coping appraisal Response efficacy Protect me effectively 0.27 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.32 Self-efficacy Require special knowledge/skills 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.15 0.10 0.23 Be frowned upon by peers −0.11 −0.17 −0.03 −0.13 −0.09 −0.04 Response costs Require a lot of effort −0.19 −0.12 −0.15 −0.20 −0.17 −0.24 Cost a lot of money −0.02 0.02 −0.13 −0.11 −0.01 −0.08 Also be useful for other purposes 0.17 0.24 0.12 0.29 0.31 0.23 Statistics F(11,291) = 8.69
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.22F(11,283) = 14.08
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.33F(11,291) = 5.81
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.15F(11,290) = 14.01
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.32F(11,283) = 13.60
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.32F(11,290) = 14.79
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.34† Standardized coefficients are reported. Bold font indicates the coefficient is significant at the 0.05 level. Table 1.
Regression analysis of fire cancer hazard adjustment intentions.
-
Variables Gross
decon†Contaminated PPE out of cab† Washing
PPE†Showering within 1hr after firefighting† Workout within 24 hr after firefighting† Wearing SCBA during overhaul† Threat appraisal Hazard salience How often do you think about occupational cancer? −0.05 −0.01 −0.04 −0.01 0.00 −0.10 Risk perception Occupational cancer concern −0.02 −0.08 −0.01 0.01 0.09 −0.06 Likelihood of cancer diagnoses 0.04 0.10 −0.06 0.00 −0.09 0.04 Likelihood of cancer being caused by firefighting 0.00 0.08 0.13 0.04 −0.07 0.07 Hazard exposure Hazard exposure index −0.02 0.05 0.09 0.06 0.03 0.01 Coping appraisal Response efficacy Protect me effectively −0.13 −0.17 −0.30 −0.30 −0.29 −0.17 Self-efficacy Require special knowledge/skills −0.12 −0.15 0.05 −0.14 −0.17 −0.27 Be frowned upon by peers 0.09 0.12 0.09 −0.01 0.02 0.06 Response costs Require a lot of effort 0.14 0.11 0.09 0.19 0.11 0.29 Cost a lot of money 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.03 0.07 0.15 Also be useful for other purposes −0.17 −0.13 0.06 −0.08 −0.06 −0.18 Statistics F(11,291) = 3.09
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.07F(11,285) = 3.91
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.10F(11,291) = 5.10
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.13F(11,290) = 4.27
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.11F(11,283) = 13.60
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.32F(11,290) = 8.54
P < 0.05
Adj R2 = 0.22† Standardized coefficients are reported. Bold font indicates the coefficient is significant at the 0.05 level. Table 2.
Regression analysis of fire cancer actual hazard adjustment.
-
Number of responses Mean SD N 0−499 3.56 0.72 49 500−1,499 3.59 0.66 41 1,500−2,499 3.47 0.73 47 2,500−4,999 3.89 0.59 69 ≥ 5,000 3.57 0.76 107 Total 3.63 0.71 313 F(4,308) = 3.27, p < 0.05 Table 3.
Number of total responses and hazard adjustment intention.
-
Previous cancer experience Mean SD N Myself 3.55 0.83 25 Coworker 3.70 0.70 200 None 3.47 0.68 89 Total 3.62 0.71 214 F(2,311) = 3.25, p < 0.05 Table 4.
Previous cancer experience and hazard adjustment intention.
Figures
(0)
Tables
(4)