Figures (0)  Tables (4)
    • VariablesGross
      decon
      Contaminated PPE out of cabWashing
      PPE
      Showering within 1 hr after firefightingWorkout within 24 hr after firefightingWearing SCBA during overhaul
      Threat appraisalHazard salienceHow often do you think about occupational cancer?0.080.03−0.020.010.010.07
      Risk perceptionOccupational cancer concern0.070.140.050.10−0.070.11
      Likelihood of cancer diagnoses−0.14−0.120.04−0.020.06−0.05
      Likelihood of cancer being caused by firefighting0.02−0.02−0.06−0.030.080.00
      Hazard exposureHazard exposure index0.110.10−0.060.010.000.02
      Coping appraisalResponse efficacyProtect me effectively0.270.300.310.310.310.32
      Self-efficacyRequire special knowledge/skills0.090.070.090.150.100.23
      Be frowned upon by peers−0.11−0.17−0.03−0.13−0.09−0.04
      Response costsRequire a lot of effort−0.19−0.12−0.15−0.20−0.17−0.24
      Cost a lot of money−0.020.02−0.13−0.11−0.01−0.08
      Also be useful for other purposes0.170.240.120.290.310.23
      StatisticsF(11,291) = 8.69
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.22
      F(11,283) = 14.08
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.33
      F(11,291) = 5.81
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.15
      F(11,290) = 14.01
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.32
      F(11,283) = 13.60
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.32
      F(11,290) = 14.79
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.34
      Standardized coefficients are reported. Bold font indicates the coefficient is significant at the 0.05 level.

      Table 1. 

      Regression analysis of fire cancer hazard adjustment intentions.

    • VariablesGross
      decon
      Contaminated PPE out of cabWashing
      PPE
      Showering within 1hr after firefightingWorkout within 24 hr after firefightingWearing SCBA during overhaul
      Threat appraisalHazard salienceHow often do you think about occupational cancer?−0.05−0.01−0.04−0.010.00−0.10
      Risk perceptionOccupational cancer concern−0.02−0.08−0.010.010.09−0.06
      Likelihood of cancer diagnoses0.040.10−0.060.00−0.090.04
      Likelihood of cancer being caused by firefighting0.000.080.130.04−0.070.07
      Hazard exposureHazard exposure index−0.020.050.090.060.030.01
      Coping appraisalResponse efficacyProtect me effectively−0.13−0.17−0.30−0.30−0.29−0.17
      Self-efficacyRequire special knowledge/skills−0.12−0.150.05−0.14−0.17−0.27
      Be frowned upon by peers0.090.120.09−0.010.020.06
      Response costsRequire a lot of effort0.140.110.090.190.110.29
      Cost a lot of money0.060.110.110.030.070.15
      Also be useful for other purposes−0.17−0.130.06−0.08−0.06−0.18
      StatisticsF(11,291) = 3.09
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.07
      F(11,285) = 3.91
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.10
      F(11,291) = 5.10
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.13
      F(11,290) = 4.27
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.11
      F(11,283) = 13.60
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.32
      F(11,290) = 8.54
      P < 0.05
      Adj R2 = 0.22
      Standardized coefficients are reported. Bold font indicates the coefficient is significant at the 0.05 level.

      Table 2. 

      Regression analysis of fire cancer actual hazard adjustment.

    • Number of responsesMeanSDN
      0−4993.560.7249
      500−1,4993.590.6641
      1,500−2,4993.470.7347
      2,500−4,9993.890.5969
      ≥ 5,0003.570.76107
      Total3.630.71313
      F(4,308) = 3.27, p < 0.05

      Table 3. 

      Number of total responses and hazard adjustment intention.

    • Previous cancer experienceMeanSDN
      Myself3.550.8325
      Coworker3.700.70200
      None3.470.6889
      Total3.620.71214
      F(2,311) = 3.25, p < 0.05

      Table 4. 

      Previous cancer experience and hazard adjustment intention.