Figures (7)  Tables (1)
    • Figure 1. 

      Schematic diagram of measuring β-Lg by MB@Cu-MOF electrochemistry.

    • Figure 2. 

      The UV-vis spectra of MB solution and mixed solution of MB and copper chloride.

    • Figure 3. 

      (a) FTIR spectrum and (b) X-ray diffraction of the Cu-MOF and the MB@Cu-MOF. SEM images of (c) the Cu-MOF and (d) the MB@Cu-MOF.

    • Figure 4. 

      (a) UV-Vis and (b) cyclic voltammogram of the MB, the Cu-MOF, the MB@Cu-MOF and the supernatant. SEM images of (c) the MB @ Cu-MOF and (d) the MB@Cu-MOF incubation with β-Lg.

    • Figure 5. 

      (a) UV-vis absorption spectra and differential pulse voltammograms of different concentrations of MB. (b) Standard curves of MB on UV-vis spectra and differential pulse voltammetry curves.

    • Figure 6. 

      (a) UV-vis and (b) differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) of the supernatant after incubation with different concentrations of β-Lg and MB@Cu-MOF. Standard curve of logarithm of β-Lg concentration on (c) UV-vis spectrum and (d) DPV curve.

    • Figure 7. 

      (a) The nature and distribution of surface charge of β-Lg, lysozyme, α-La and ovalbumin. (b) The absorbance of the MB@Cu-MOF incubation with β-Lg (1 mg/mL), lysozyme (1 mg/mL), α-La (1 mg/mL) and Ovalbumin (1 mg/mL).

    • SampleELISA (μg/mL)Modified sensor (μg/mL)
      Telunsu17.09 ± 0.5617.05 ± 0.55
      Yili15.54 ± 0.4716.10 ± 0.10
      Mengniu15.47 ± 0.4014.60 ± 0.60
      Jindian10.38 ± 0.0210.85 ± 0.25

      Table 1. 

      Comparison of β-Lg detection in real samples using the ELISA and modified sensors.