Figures (0)  Tables (4)
    • VariablesYearSiteParentOffspring
      MeanSE§RangeMeanSERange
      Inflorescence prolificacy rating
      2012Pks6.310.241.00−9.005.170.142.00−8.00
      Stw6.290.211.00−9.005.400.163.00−8.00
      2013Pks6.240.251.00−9.006.170.192.00−9.00
      Stw6.080.241.00−9.005.590.182.00−8.00
      Combined6.230.121.00−9.005.590.092.00−9.00
      Seed set (%)2012Pks21.581.910.73−63.6937.662.231.83−86.29
      Stw27.372.340.00−85.5544.282.404.16−89.54
      2013Pks18.060.020.14−62.7830.012.071.38−68.89
      Stw29.412.340.20−82.1424.632.000.10−73.29
      Combined24.111.070.00−85.5534.151.170.10−89.54
      Seed yield (kg ha−1)2012Pks152.2316.291.26−742.44198.269.5031.75−373.86
      Stw114.3911.230−419.67165.759.104.31−403.18
      2013Pks10.541.540−70.7523.473.650−136.30
      Stw8.050.950−39.377.800.840.33−33.61
      Combined71.306.160-742.4498.825.940-403.18
      Rating scale was 1−9, where 1 indicated the least inflorescences while 9 was the greatest inflorescence prolificacy.
      Sites were Stw = Stillwater, Pks = Perkins.
      § Standard error of the group mean.

      Table 1. 

      Means, standard errors and ranges of seed yield and its components in parents and progeny half-sib families.

    • SourcesDfInflorescence prolificacySeed set
      (%)
      Seed yield
      (kg ha−1)
      2012 test of fixed effects (F values)
      Location (L)11.533.7310.16*
      Expected mean squares
      Family (F)244.16*0.11*23,960.13*
      F × L241.260.04*3,902.04
      Rep/L41.810.0412,709.81*
      F × Rep/L961.16*0.02*2,513.33*
      2013 test of fixed effects (F values)
      Location (L)14.59*3.3613.25*
      Expected mean squares
      Family (F)245.67*0.09*910.22*
      F × L242.810.03*694.42*
      Rep/L42.570.011,787.60*
      F × Rep/L961.74*0.02*336.71*
      Across 2-location and 2-year test of fixed effects (F values)
      Location (L)10.810.067.99*
      Year (Y)19.20*45.33*199.86*
      L × Y16.45*9.55*3.32
      Expected mean squares
      Family (F)246.97*0.170*14,483.50*
      F × L242.150.048*3,060.98*
      Rep/L42.330.0073,986.73*
      F × Y253.81*0.085*93,009.25*
      F × L × Y252.34*0.038*1,686.89
      F × Y × Rep/L1961.46*0.020*1,610.44*
      * Significant at the 0.05 probability level.
      Rating scale was 1−9, where 1 indicated the least inflorescences while 9 was the greatest inflorescence prolificacy.

      Table 2. 

      Tests of fixed effects due to location by year, location and year, and expected mean squares due to random effects of various sources for inflorescences prolificacy, seed set percentage and seed yield among half-sib families combined across locations (Stillwater and Perkins) or/and years (2012 and 2013).

    • Variables20122013Combined
      Inflorescence prolificacy0.700.500.55
      Seed set (%)0.610.630.78
      Seed yield (kg ha−1)0.840.230.18
      Estimates were based on the single year data across locations.
      Estimates were based on the two-year data across locations.

      Table 3. 

      Narrow-sense heritability estimates for seed yield and its components in bermudagrass based on component of genetic variation among half-sib families.

    • TraitsStillwaterPerkinsStillwaterPerkins
      2012201220132013
      Inflorescence prolificacy0.30*(0.15)0.53*(0.14)0.21(0.16)0.33(0.18)
      Seed set (%)0.76*(0.28)0.33(0.21)0.66*(0.27)0.41*(0.20)
      Seed yield
      (kg ha−1)
      0.26*(0.13)0.68*(0.18)−0.10(0.13)1.38(0.88)
      Data for half-sib families were at the Stillwater site, and for parents at the Perkins site.
      Data for half-sib families were at the Perkins site, and for parents at the Stillwater site.
      * Significant at the 0.05 probability level.

      Table 4. 

      Narrow-sense heritability estimates and their standard errors (in parentheses) for inflorescences prolificacy, seed set percentage and seed yield in 2012 and 2013 based on parent-offspring regression.