Figures (20)  Tables (2)
    • Figure 1. 

      Location of TLB in the Yangtze River Delta in China.

    • Figure 2. 

      Spatial distribution of supply and demand of water yield service.

    • Figure 3. 

      Maps showing water yield supply, demand, and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 4. 

      Spatial distribution of supply and demand of carbon sequestration service.

    • Figure 5. 

      Maps showing carbon sequestration supply, demand, and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, and it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 6. 

      Spatial distribution of supply and demand of recreation service.

    • Figure 7. 

      Maps showing recreation supply, demand, and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 8. 

      Spatial distribution of supply and demand of food production service.

    • Figure 9. 

      Maps showing food production supply, demand, and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 10. 

      Spatial distribution of supply and demand of heat regulation service.

    • Figure 11. 

      Maps showing heat regulation supply, demand, and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, and it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 12. 

      ESDR of water yield service under different scales and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, and it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 13. 

      ESDR of carbon sequestration service under different scales and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 14. 

      ESDR of recreation service under different scales and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, and it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 15. 

      ESDR of food production service under different scales and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, and it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 16. 

      ESDR of heat regulation service under different scales and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, and it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • Figure 17. 

      Spatial distribution of ESDR at different scales in 2010.

    • Figure 18. 

      Spatial distribution of ESDR at different scales in 2020.

    • Figure 19. 

      Spatial distribution of CESDR at different scales.

    • Figure 20. 

      CESDR under different scales and correlation analysis. (When p < 0.05, it is marked with '*'. When p < 0.01, it is marked with '**'. When p < 0.001, it is marked with '***') in TLB in 2010 and 2020.

    • DataData descriptionSourceScale
      Administrative boundariesAdministrative boundaries of cities, counties, and townshipswww.resdc.cnCities, counties, and townships
      DEMwww.gscloud.cn30 m resolution
      Climate dataTemperature, Average maximum temperature, precipitationwww.worldclim.org30 m resolution
      Soil datahttps://data.tpdc.ac.cn1,000 m resolution
      Land-use datawww.geodata.cn30 m resolution
      PopulationDistributed, agewww.worldpop.org100 m resolution
      Statistical datawater requirement,
      Carbon emissions,
      Per capita green area,
      Food production and consumption
      Provincial, urban, and county statistical yearbooks, and the Water Resources Bulletin of the TLB30 m resolution

      Table 1. 

      The data source.

    • (I) scales(J) scalesp-value in 201095% confidence interval in 2010p-value in 202095% confidence interval in 2020
      Lower boundUpper boundlower boundUpper bound
      PixelTownship00.10650.137800.14960.2059
      County0.0020.02620.11520.010.02440.1843
      City0.47−0.14790.06820.644−0.23990.1484
      TownshipPixel0−0.1378−0.10650−0.2059−0.1496
      County0.027−0.0971−0.00580.08−0.15540.0087
      City0.003−0.2705−0.05340.025−0.4185−0.0285
      CountyPixel0.002−0.1152−0.02620.01−0.1843−0.0244
      Township0.0270.00580.09710.08−0.00870.1554
      City0.062−0.22680.00570.159−0.35900.0587
      CityPixel0.47−0.06820.14790.644−0.14840.2399

      Table 2. 

      Results of CESDR variance test in 2010 and 2020.