-
Cross/
parentFemale × malea Number of progeny Progeny/
parent meanbSD 1 TF-2 × TF-5 (S × T) 96 5.5 0.8 2 TF-2 × TF-6 (S × T) 95 4.1 0.9 3 TF-2 × TF-10 (S × T) 96 4.3 1.0 4 TF-2 × TF-15 (S × S) 96 4.7 0.6 5 TF-2 × TF-21 (S × S) 96 3.4 0.3 6 TF-5 × TF-2 (T × S) 96 6.0 1.0 7 TF-5 × TF-6 (T × T) 96 5.3 1.5 8 TF-5 × TF-10 (T × T) 96 5.5 1.1 9 TF-5 × TF-15 (T × S) 96 6.0 0.7 10 TF-5 × TF-21 (T × S) 96 6.1 0.9 11 TF-6 × TF-2 (T × S) 95 4.1 0.5 12 TF-6 × TF-5 (T × T) 95 5.1 1.6 13 TF-6 × TF-10 (T × T) 96 4.6 0.9 14 TF-6 × TF-15 (T × S) 96 5.1 0.5 15 TF-6 × TF-21 (T × S) 96 3.3 0.5 16 TF-10 × TF-2 (T × S) 90 4.5 2.1 17 TF-10 × TF-5 (T × T) 96 5.3 0.7 18 TF-10 × TF-6 (T × T) 96 4.4 0.6 19 TF-10 × TF-15 (T × S) 91 4.2 0.8 20 TF-10 × TF-21 (T × S) 76 3.7 0.9 21 TF-15 × TF-2 (S × S) 91 5.0 1.1 22 TF-15 × TF-5 (S × T) 95 6.3 1.5 23 TF-15 × TF-6 (S × T) 96 5.2 0.8 24 TF-15 × TF-10 (S × T) 63 4.5 1.0 25 TF-15 × TF-21 (S × S) 96 4.9 0.7 26 TF-21 × TF-2 (S × S) 96 3.0 0.6 27 TF-21 × TF-5 (S × T) 96 5.3 0.6 28 TF-21 × TF-6 (S × T) 92 3.2 0.4 29 TF-21 × TF-10 (S × T) 63 3.2 0.5 30 TF-21 × TF-15 (S × S) 96 4.6 1.3 TF-5 (T) − 6.9 1.0 TF-6 (T) − 4.0 1.3 TF-10 (T) − 4.6 1.2 TF-2 (S) − 4.1 0.7 TF-15 (S) − 5.7 0.8 TF-21 (S) − 3.1 1.3 LSD0.05 0.87 a S in the parentheses denotes summer stress sensitive, and T denotes summer stress tolerant. b Summer stress tolerance ratings were taken on a 1 to 9 scale with 1 being a completely wilted or dormant plant, and 9 being a green, fully turgid, actively growing plant. Turfgrass color, texture, and disease were not considered when evaluating summer stress responses. Table 1.
Description of diallel crosses between three summer stress tolerant and three summer stress sensitive tall fescue genotypes and summer stress tolerance means across four replications and two years.
-
Maternal
parentNumber of
progenyMaternal
meanabSD Paternal
meanacMid-parent
meanaPseudo F2
meanabSD TF-5 96 6.1a 1.0 3.2 4.7 6.0a 0.8 TF-6 96 2.9cd 1.5 3.8 3.4 4.5bc 0.9 TF-10 95 3.4c 1.2 3.7 3.6 4.2bc 0.9 TF-2 96 2.9cd 1.2 3.8 3.4 4.6b 1.0 TF-15 96 4.5b 1.7 3.5 4.0 5.9a 1.0 TF-21 96 2.3d 1.2 4.0 3.1 4.0c 0.7 LSD0.05 0.95 0.54 ANOVA of the Pseudo F2 Source of variation df Pr > F Year 1 0.0970 NS Replication (year) 6 < 0.0001 *** Polycross 5 < 0.0001 *** Polycross × year 5 0.0703 NS Residuals 30 a Summer stress tolerance ratings were taken on a 1 to 9 scale with 1 being a completely wilted or dormant plant, and 9 being a green, fully turgid, actively growing plant. Turfgrass color, texture, and disease were not considered when evaluating summer stress responses. b Means followed by different lowercase letters indicated significant differences (p < 0.05) within the column. c Pollen source was considered one homogeneous entity for all crosses. Paternal means were calculated based on all clones involved in the polycross block excluding the maternal parent because of self-incompatibility. Table 2.
Description and analysis of variance (ANOVA) table of the polycross block using three summer stress tolerant and three summer stress sensitive tall fescue genotypes. Summer stress tolerance means were averaged across four replications and two years.
-
Source of variationa df Sum square Mean square F value Pr >F 2012 Replication 3 13.9 4.62 9.60 1.180e-05 *** GCA 5 141.9 28.38 58.94 < 2.2e-16 *** SCA 15 25.4 1.69 3.51 7.064e-05 *** Reciprocal 15 5.5 0.36 0.76 0.7207 NS Residuals 105 50.6 0.48 2013 Replication 3 14.8 4.94 4.66 0.00426 ** GCA 5 103.0 20.59 19.41 1.211e-13 *** SCA 15 25.9 1.73 1.63 0.07834 NS Reciprocal 15 14.1 0.94 0.89 0.58211 NS Residuals 105 111.4 1.06 a GCA, general combining ability; SCA, specific combining ability. ** Significant at the 0.01 probability level. *** Significant at the 0.001 probability level. NS not significant at the 0.05 probability level. Table 3.
Analysis of variance table for the full diallel cross study.
-
Year Narrow-sense heritability Standard error 2012 0.578 0.059 *** 2013 0.825 0.144 *** Combined 0.637 0.062 *** *** Significant at the 0.001 probability level. Table 4.
Narrow-sense heritability estimates and their standard errors for summer stress tolerance ratings from the diallel study in 2012 and 2013 based on mid-parent/offspring regression.
Figures
(0)
Tables
(4)