Figures (8)  Tables (6)
    • Figure 1. 

      Longitudinal section of typical structure.

    • Figure 2. 

      DSAN model overall architecture diagram.

    • Figure 3. 

      DualTCN temporal block structure.

    • Figure 4. 

      Comparison of observed and predicted values.

    • Figure 5. 

      Effect of scatter diagram of each model. (a) DSAN. (b) LSTM. (c) LSTM-Attn. (d) TCN_LSTM.

    • Figure 6. 

      Comparison of the rutting depth of asphalt structures with different thicknesses over time.

    • Figure 7. 

      Absolute value distribution of rutting depth variation of asphalt structures with different thicknesses.

    • Figure 8. 

      Distribution characteristics of errors in microstructure and thickness.

    • Structure No.AC layer thickness (cm)Base course type
      STR112Thin asphalt semi-rigid structure
      STR616Ordinary semi-rigid structure
      STR718Ordinary semi-rigid structure
      STR132424~28 cm thick asphalt structure
      STR112824~28 cm thick asphalt structure
      STR163636 cm thick asphalt structure
      STR1948Full-depth asphalt structure
      STR1852Full-depth asphalt structure

      Table 1. 

      Table of typical structural parameters.

    • Parameter name Value
      Look_back 12
      Hidden_dim 128
      Layers of TCN 2
      Layers of LSTM 1
      Heads of MSA 8
      Learning_rate 0.001

      Table 2. 

      Hyperparameters for model training.

    • Model RMSE MAE R2
      LSTM 4.581 2.696 0.93
      TCN_LSTM 4.527 2.728 0.932
      LSTM_Attn 4.562 2.665 0.931
      DSAN 4.272 2.452 0.943

      Table 3. 

      Comparison of the prediction performance of various models.

    • Thickness grouping Model Evaluation metric
      RMSE MAE R2
      Thin layer structure group DSAN 5.3 3.32 0.913
      TCN-only 5.721 3.632 0.898
      LSTM-only 5.573 3.541 0.903
      LSTM + MHA-only 5.424 3.44 0.908
      DualTCN-only 5.514 3.53 0.904
      DSAN (without TCN) 5.628 3.579 0.902
      DSAN (without MSA) 5.649 3.588 0.9
      Middle structure group DSAN 5.514 3.706 0.959
      TCN-only 6.626 4.612 0.942
      LSTM-only 5.991 4.17 0.951
      LSTM + MHA-only 5.629 3.917 0.956
      DualTCN-only 6.165 4.29 0.947
      DSAN (without TCN) 5.728 3.986 0.955
      DSAN (without MSA) 5.93 4.126 0.952
      Thick layer structure group DSAN 5.808 3.819 0.958
      TCN-only 6.482 4.131 0.947
      LSTM-only 6.29 4.01 0.951
      LSTM + MHA-only 5.905 3.763 0.956
      DualTCN-only 6.391 4.073 0.95
      DSAN (without TCN) 5.905 3.763 0.955
      DSAN (without MSA) 6.288 4.013 0.951

      Table 4. 

      Ablation study of proposed models.

    • Thickness groupingModelEvaluation metricRelative improvement (%)
      RMSEMAER2RMSEMAER2
      Thin layer structure groupDSAN5.33.320.9134.9%6.2%1%
      LSTM5.5733.5410.903
      Middle structure groupDSAN5.5143.7060.9598.0%11.1%0.8%
      LSTM5.9914.170.951
      Thick layer structure groupDSAN5.8083.8190.9587.7%4.8%0.7%
      LSTM6.294.010.951

      Table 5. 

      Comparison of model performance under different thickness groups.

    • Structure number Evaluation metric
      RMSE MAE R2
      STR1 5.3 3.32 0.913
      STR6 4.599 2.657 0.933
      STR7 5.118 3.127 0.966
      STR13 4.993 3.239 0.917
      STR11 5.514 3.706 0.959
      STR16 4.549 2.527 0.949
      STR19 4.976 3.299 0.9
      STR18 5.808 3.819 0.958

      Table 6. 

      Leave-one-structure-out (LOSO) tests of proposed models.