Figures (3)  Tables (3)
    • Figure 1. 

      Steckling transplanting method of sugar beet seed production.

    • Figure 2. 

      Comparative assessment of planting methods and fertilizer doses based on recorded observations (a) Days to bolting. (b) Bolting per cent. (c) Days to stalk formation. (d) Days to flowering. (e) Days to seed harvesting. (f) Yield per plant. *** Highly significant (p < 0.001), and ** or * denotes significant differences (p < 0.05).

    • Figure 3. 

      Fertilizer dosage regimen for high and quality seed production in sugar beet.

    • GenotypesCharacteristics
      LKC 2020High ethanol potential even under drought stress, tolerance to Spodoptera litura (Armyworm)
      LKC 2010Drought tolerance, elevated sucrose content, and robust bioethanol recovery
      LKC 2006High temperature tolerant
      LKC 2007Water deficit stress tolerant; high root yields and superior juice quality; high temperature tolerant
      IISR Comp 1High temperature tolerant; salinity tolerant
      LS 6High sugar content

      Table 1. 

      Characteristics of ICAR-ISRI identified sugar beet genotypes used in the study.

    • Planting/sowing method Steckling (E1) Pit method (E3) Direct seeded (E2)
      Location Lucknow (sowing) Mukteshwar (transplanting) Mukteshwar
      Sowing 1st fortnight of October May/June
      Transplanting 2nd fortnight of December 1st fortnight of March Not applicable
      Seed harvesting Aug (2nd fortnight) to September (1st fortnight)
      Key activities Sowing and steckling preparation at Lucknow (October–December); selection, trimming, and transport of healthy stecklings to Mukteshwar and transplantation, crop care, flowering, and seed setting (December–September).
      Sowing at ICAR-ISRI, Lucknow (October); selection and transport of stecklings to Mukteshwar; placement of roots in pre-dug pits (60 cm × 100 cm) before snowfall; natural cold treatment for vernalization during winter; retrieval and field transplantation after snowmelt and crop growth, flowering, and seed harvest (July–September). Direct sowing of sugar beet seeds at Mukteshwar (May–June); continuous crop growth without transplantation; regular irrigation, nutrient, and pest management; flowering, seed maturation, and harvesting (September next year).

      Table 2. 

      Description of different planting methods.

    • Planting styleGermplasmStalk percentage
      (mean ± SD)
      Flowering percentage
      (mean ± SD)
      Germination percentage
      (mean ± SD)
      Test weight
      (mean ± SD with rank)
      F1F2F1F2F1F2F1F2
      E1IISR COMP 169.17 ± 3.7565.00 ± 5.0061.67 ± 8.7558.33 ± 7.6490.95 ± 2.8885.98 ± 3.292.46 ± 0.033.18 ± 0.02
      LS 680.00 ± 6.4675.83 ± 5.1571.67 ± 3.7570.83 ± 2.8992.46 ± 2.2988.21 ± 2.462.33 ± 0.033.14 ± 0.06
      LKC 200686.67 ± 1.4478.33 ± 2.8985.00 ± 5.0070.83 ± 4.9696.37 ± 2.3491.57 ± 2.182.56 ± 0.043.24 ± 0.08
      LKC 200785.83 ± 5.1571.67 ± 2.8980.00 ±6.4569.17 ± 5.2790.91 ± 1.7685.35 ± 2.122.44 ± 0.033.04 ± 0.04
      LKC 201074.17 ± 3.7568.33 ± 2.8987.50 ± 6.4562.50 ± 4.7989.38 ± 0.8684.63 ± 2.032.35 ± 0.022.74 ± 0.34
      LKC 202071.67 ± 3.7565.83 ± 5.1585.00 ± 2.8964.17 ± 5.8592.16 ± 2.1188.28 ± 1.992.51 ± 0.073.23 ± 0.07
      E2IISR COMP 182.50 ± 4.3370.00 ± 2.5087.50 ± 2.5065.00 ± 4.3392.51 ± 1.9988.54 ± 2.062.70 ± 0.183.10 ± 0.07
      LS 690.83 ± 3.7583.33 ± 2.8995.83 ± 1.4475.83 ± 1.4493.28 ± 0.9987.85 ± 1.422.52 ± 0.083.18 ± 0.02
      LKC 200686.67 ± 5.0081.67 ± 3.8990.00 ± 2.8973.33 ± 8.0695.17 ± 0.9191.84 ± 1.344.31 ± 0.094.84 ± 0.05
      LKC 200784.17 ± 8.0675.83 ± 7.582.50 ± 6.4569.17 ± 7.5091.74 ± 1.0488.82 ± 1.014.35 ± 0.033.50 ± 0.34
      LKC 201084.17 ±10.9374.17 ± 16.0780.83 ± 8.9666.67 ± 17.5691.51 ± 1.7587.25 ± 1.874.08 ± 0.083.44 ± 0.06
      LKC 202090.00 ± 2.8981.67 ± 6.2984.17 ± 3.7574.17 ± 3.7594.56 ± 0.8890.87 ± 1.554.15 ± 0.043.55 ± 0.16
      E3IISR COMP 156.67 ± 7.6461.67 ± 7.6455.83 ± 3.7551.67 ± 6.2988.43 ± 1.4586.35 ± 1.931.08 ± 0.021.53 ± 0.04
      LS 655.83 ± 5.1553.33 ± 5.0054.17 ± 5.1545.83 ± 3.7595.22 ± 1.1192.87 ± 1.571.35 ± 0.041.86 ± 0.09
      LKC 200659.17 ± 3.8955.83 ± 3.8960.00 ± 6.2953.33 ± 1.4493.64 ± 0.9989.74 ± 1.361.77 ± 0.042.12 ± 0.08
      LKC 200762.50 ± 2.5060.00 ± 6.2957.50 ± 5.0059.17 ± 4.7990.32 ± 1.2886.44 ± 1.451.46 ± 0.091.58 ± 0.11
      LKC 201053.33 ± 3.7950.00 ± 5.0050.00 ± 4.3346.67 ± 5.7790.33 ± 1.4586.18 ± 1.741.14 ± 0.051.29 ± 0.07
      LKC 202065.00 ± 4.3357.50 ± 5.0061.67 ± 3.7555.00 ± 5.0091.63 ± 1.1787.76 ± 1.681.15 ± 0.031.31 ± 0.06
      * F1-120:60:60; F2-120:80:80; bold data denotes the highest values in each column (F1 and F2 separately for each trait), to highlight the most significant data.

      Table 3. 

      Mean ± standard deviation of agro-morphological traits under different planting methods and NPK fertilizer levels.