[1] Jensen RG, Kabrick JM, Zenner EK. 2002. Tree cavity estimation and verification in the Missouri Ozarks. In: Shifley, S. R. and J. M. Kabrick (eds.). Proceedings of the second Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Symposium: post treatment results of the landscape experiment, St. Louis, MO, October 17−20, 2000. General Technical Report NC-227: 227pp. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. pp. 114−29
[2] Carey AB. 1983. Cavities in trees in hardwood forests. In Snag habitat management: proceedings of the symposium, eds. Davis JW, Goodwin GA. U.S. For. Serv. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-99. pp. 167−84
[3] Fan Z, Shifley SR, Spetich MA, Thompson III FR, Larsen DR. 2005. Abundance and size distribution of cavity trees in second-growth and old-growth central hardwood forests. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 22:162−69 doi: 10.1093/njaf/22.3.162
[4] Fan Z, Larsen DR, Shifley SR, Thompson III FR. 2003. Estimating cavity tree abundance by stand age and basal area, Missouri. Forest Ecology and Management 179:231−42 doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00522-4
[5] Healy WM, Brooks RT, DeGraaf RM. 1989. Cavity trees in sawtimber-size oak stands in central Massachusetts. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 6:61−65 doi: 10.1093/njaf/6.2.61
[6] Goodburn JM, Lorimer CG. 1998. Cavity trees and coarse woody debris in old-growth and managed northern hardwood forests in Wisconsin and Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 28:427−38 doi: 10.1139/x98-014
[7] Graves AT, Fajvan MA, Miller GW. 2000. The effects of thinning intensity on snag and cavity tree abundance in an Appalachian hardwood stand. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 30:1214−20 doi: 10.1139/x00-051
[8] Fan Z, Shifley SR, Thompson III FR, Larsen DR. 2004. Simulated cavity tree dynamics under alternative timber harvest regimes. Forest Ecology and Management 193:399−412 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.008
[9] Vangilder LD. 1997. Acorn production on the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: pre-treatment data. In Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: an experimental approach to landscape research, eds. Brookshire B L, Shifley SR, 1997. St. Louis, MO. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-193. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. pp. 198−209
[10] Allen AW, Corn JG. 1990. Relationships between live tree diameter and cavity abundance in a Missouri oak-hickory forest. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 7:179−83 doi: 10.1093/njaf/7.4.179
[11] Fan Z, Shifley SR, Spetich MA, Thompson III FR, Larsen DR. 2003. Distribution of cavity trees in midwestern old-growth and second-growth forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33:1481−94 doi: 10.1139/x03-068
[12] Andersson J, Domingo Gómez E, Michon S, Roberge JM. 2018. Tree cavity densities and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research 33:233−44 doi: 10.1080/02827581.2017.1360389
[13] Woudenberg SW, Conkling BL, O'Connell BM, LaPoint EB, Turner JA, et al. 2010. The Forest Inventory and Analysis Database: Database description and users manual version 4.0 for Phase 2. General Technical Report RMRSGTR-245. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 336 pp.
[14] Keitt TH, Urban DL, Milne BT. 1997. Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes. Conservation Ecology 1: 4. https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol1/iss1/art4/
[15] Riitters K, Wickham J, O'Neill R, Jones B, Smith E. 2000. Global-scale patterns of forest fragmentation. Conservation Ecology 4: 3 https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol4/iss2/art3/
[16] Gutzwiller KJ. 2002. Applying landscape ecology in biological conservation. Choice Reviews Online 40:40-1521 doi: 10.5860/choice.40-1521
[17] Fan Z, Lee S, Shifley SR, Thompson III FR, Larsen DR. 2004b. Simulating the effect of landscape size and age structure on cavity tree density using a resampling technique. Forest Science 50:603−9
[18] De'ath G, Fabricius KE. 2000. Classification and regression trees: a powerful yet simple technique for ecological data analysis. Ecology 81:3178−92 doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[3178:CARTAP]2.0.CO;2
[19] Johnson PS, Shifley SR, Rogers R, Dey DC, Kabrick JM. 2019. The ecology and silviculture of oaks. Wallingford, Oxon, UK: CABI Publishing. 628 pp. http://www.doi.org/10.1079/9781845934743.0000
[20] Braun EL. 1950. Deciduous forests of eastern North America. Blakiston, Philadelphia. 596 pp https://doi.org/10.1079/9781780647081.0000
[21] McShea WJ, Healy WM. 2002. Oak forest ecosystems: ecology and management for wildlife. Baltimore, Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press. 432 pp.
[22] Shifley SR, Brookshire BL, Larsen DR, Herbeck LA. 1997. Snags and down wood in Missouri old-growth and mature second-growth forests. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry 14:165−72 doi: 10.1093/njaf/14.4.165
[23] Spetich MA, Shifley SR, Parker GR. 1999. Regional distribution and dynamics of coarse woody debris in temperate deciduous old-growth forests. Forest Science 45:302−13
[24] Brookshire BL, Shifley SR (eds.). 1997. Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: an experimental approach to landscape research. St. Louis, Missouri, 1997. General Technical Report NC-193, U.S. Forest Service, St. Paul, MN. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experimental Station. 378 pp. https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/10257
[25] Shifley SR, Brookshire BL (eds.). 2000. Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: site history, soils, landforms, woody and herbaceous vegetation, down wood, and inventory methods for the landscape experiment. General Technical Report NC-208. St. Paul, MN. U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station.
[26] Sheriff SL, He Z. 1997. The experimental design of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project. Proceedings of the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project Symposium: an experimental approach to landscape research, St. Louis, MO, 1997. General Technical Report NC-193. St. Paul, MN: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. pp. 26−40 https://www.fs.usda.gov/treesearch/pubs/53558
[27] Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ. 1984. Classification and Regression Trees. Pacific Grove, CA: Wadsworth.
[28] Gingrich SF. 1967. Measuring and evaluating stocking and stand density in upland hardwood forests in the Central States. Forest Science 13:38−53
[29] Rogers R. 1983. Guides for thinning shortleaf pine. Proceeding of second Biennial Southern Silvicultural Research Conference, Atlanta, Georgia, 1982. General Technical Report SE-24. Asheville, NC: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station. pp. 217–25
[30] Stout SL, Nyland RD. 1986. Role of species composition in relative density measurement in Allegheny hardwoods. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16:574−79 doi: 10.1139/x86-099
[31] Guyette R, Kabrick J. 2002. The legacy and continuity of forest disturbance, succession, and species at the MOFEP sites. Proceedings of the second Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Symposium: post-treatment results of the landscape experiment, St. Louis, MO, 2000. General Technical Report. NC-227. St. Paul, MN: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station. pp. 26−44
[32] Sheriff SL. 2002. Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project: the experiment. Proceedings of the second Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Symposium: post-treatment results of the landscape experiment, St. Louis, MO, 2000. General Technical Report. NC-227. St. Paul, MN: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: pp. 1−25
[33] Stojanovic D, Koch AJ, Webb M, Cunningham R, Roshier D, et al. 2014. Validation of a landscape-scale planning tool for cavity-dependent wildlife. Austral Ecology 39:579−86 doi: 10.1111/aec.12118
[34] Meentemeyer V, Box EO. 1987. Scale effects in landscape studies. In Landscape heterogeneity and disturbance, ed. Tuner MG. New York: Springer-Verlag. pp. 15−34
[35] Wiens JA. 1989. Spatial scaling in ecology. Functional ecology 3:385−97 doi: 10.2307/2389612
[36] Peterson DL, Paker VT. 1998. Dimensions of scale in ecology, resource management, and society. In Ecological scale: theory and application, eds. Peterson DL, Parker VT. New York: Columbia University Press. pp. 499−522
[37] Alexander HM, Foster BL, Ballantyne IVF, Collins CD, Antonovics J, et al. 2012. Metapopulations and metacommunities: combining spatial and temporal perspectives in plant ecology. Journal of Ecology 100:88−103 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2745.2011.01917.x
[38] Breiman L. 2001. Random Forests. Machine Learning 45:5−32 doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324
[39] Bauer E, Kohavi R. 1999. An empirical comparison of voting classification algorithms: Bagging, Bossting, and Variants. Machine Learning 36:105−39 doi: 10.1023/A:1007515423169