[1]

Amanullah. 2018. Best Management Practices Reduce Soil Pollution and Improve Health of All: a review. Proceeding of the Global symposium on soil pollution held at UN FAO Headquarters- Rome, Italy, 2−4 May, 2018. pp: 262−67

[2]

Amanullah, Iqbal A, Khan A, Khalid S, Shah A, et al. 2019. Integrated management of phosphorus, organic sources, and beneficial microbes improve dry matter partitioning of maize. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 50:2544−69

doi: 10.1080/00103624.2019.1667378
[3]

Amanullah, Inamullah, Alkahtani J, Elshikh MS, Alwahibi MS, et al. 2020. Phosphorus and zinc fertilization influence crop growth rates and total biomass of coarse vs. fine types rice cultivars. Agronomy 10:1356

doi: 10.3390/agronomy10091356
[4]

Amanullah, Khalid S, Khalil F, Elshikh MS, Alwahibi MS, et al. 2021. Growth and dry matter partitioning response in cereal-legume intercropping under full and limited irrigation regimes. Scientific Reports 11:12585

doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-92022-4
[5]

Kruger EL, Volin JC. 2006. Reexamining the empirical relation between plant growth and leaf photosynthesis. Functional Plant Biology 33:421

doi: 10.1071/fp05310
[6]

Irving LJ. 2015. Carbon assimilation, biomass partitioning and productivity in grasses. Agriculture 5:1116−34

doi: 10.3390/agriculture5041116
[7]

IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Synthesis, Report Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Geneva, IPCC. 104 pp.

[8]

FAO. 2019a. Measuring and modelling soil carbon stocks and stock changes in livestock production systems – Guidelines for assessment. Version 1. Advanced copy. 152 pp.

[9]

FAO. 2019b. Measuring and modelling soil carbon stocks and stock changes in livestock production systems – A scoping analysis for the LEAP work stream on soil carbon stock changes. Rome. 84 pp. https://www.fao.org/3/CA2933EN/ca2933en.pdf

[10]

FAO. 2019c. The international code of conduct for the sustainable use and management of fertilizers. Rome, FAO. 30 pp.

[11]

FAO Outlook. 2018. Biannual report on global food markets. Rome, FAO.

[12]

FAO. 2017a. Unlocking the Potential of Soil Organic Carbon. FAO, IPCC, UNCCD, UNO, WMO.

[13]

FAO. 2017b. Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon. FAO, Rome, Italy

[14]

FAO. 2017c. Soil Organic Carbon: the hidden potential. FAO, Rome, Italy

[15]

UNFCCC. 2014. Handbook on Measurement, Reporting and Verification for developing countries. Bonn

[16]

IPBES. 2015. Scoping for a thematic assessment of land degradation and restoration (deliverable 3(b) (i)). www.ipbes.net/event/ipbes-3-plenary

[17]

Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K. (Eds.). 2006. IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. IGES, Japan. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme.

[18]

UNEP, SETAC. 2011. Global guidance principles for life cycle assessment databases. www.unep.org/pdf/Global-Guidance-Principles-for-LCA.pdf

[19]

Chen S, Wang W, Xu W, Wang Y, Wan H, et al. 2018. Plant diversity enhances productivity and soil carbon storage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115:4027−32

doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700298114
[20]

Davis MR, Alves BJR, Karlen DL, Kline KL, Galdos M, Abulebdeh D. 2018. Review of soil organic carbon measurement protocols: A US and Brazil comparison and recommendation. Sustainability 10:53

doi: 10.3390/su10010053
[21]

Ma S, He F, Tian D, Zou D, Yan Z, et al. 2018. Variations and determinants of carbon content in plants: a global synthesis. Biogeosciences 15:693−702

doi: 10.5194/bg-15-693-2018
[22]

Malone B, Hedley C, Roudier P, Minasny B, Jones E, et al. 2018. Auditing on-farm soil carbon stocks using downscaled national mapping products: examples from Australia and New Zealand. Geoderma 13:1−14

doi: 10.1016/j.geodrs.2018.02.002
[23]

Bispo A, Andersen L, Angers DA, Bernoux M, Brossard M, et al. 2017. Accounting for carbon stocks in soils and measuring GHGs emission fluxes from soils: do we have the necessary standards? Frontiers in Environmental Science 5:41

doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2017.00041
[24]

Brilli L, Bechini L, Bindi M, Carozzi M, Cavalli D, et al. 2017. Review and analysis of strengths and weaknesses of agro-ecosystem models for simulating C and N fluxes. The Science of the Total Environment 598:445−70

doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.208
[25]

Chevallier T, Cournac L, Bernoux M, Cardinael R, Cozzi T, et al. 2017. Soil inorganic carbon and climate change in drylands. An emerging issue? Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon. FAO, Rome, Italy. pp: 482−85

[26]

Conrad KA, Dalal RC, Dalzell SA, Allen DE, Menzies NW. 2017. The sequestration and turnover of soil organic carbon in subtropical Leucaena-grass pastures. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 248:38−47

doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2017.07.020
[27]

Dignac MF, Derrien D, Barré P, Barot S, Cécillon L, et al. 2017. Increasing soil carbon storage: mechanisms, effects of agricultural practices and proxies. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37:14

doi: 10.1007/s13593-017-0421-2
[28]

Maillard É, McConkey BG, Angers DA. 2017. Increased uncertainty in soil carbon stock measurement with spatial scale and sampling profile depth in world grasslands: a systematic analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 236:268−76

doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.024
[29]

Jiang Q, Li Q, Wang X, Wu Y, Yang X, et al. 2017. Estimation of soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in different soil layers using VNIR spectroscopy: effects of spiking on model applicability. Geoderma 293:54−63

doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.030
[30]

Stahl C, Fontaine S, Klumpp K, Picon-Cochard C, Grise MM, et al. 2017. Continuous soil carbon storage of old permanent pastures in Amazonia. Global Change Biology 23:3382−92

doi: 10.1111/gcb.13573
[31]

Stahl C, Freycon V, Fontaine S, Dezécache C, Ponchant L, et al. 2016. Soil carbon stocks after conversion of Amazonian tropical forest to grazed pasture: importance of deep soil layers. Regional Environmental Change 16:2059−69

doi: 10.1007/s10113-016-0936-0
[32]

Guo L, Zhao C, Zhang H, Chen Y, Linderman M, et al. 2017. Comparisons of spatial and non-spatial models for predicting soil carbon content based on visible and near-infrared spectral technology. Geoderma 285:280−92

doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.10.010
[33]

Allen DE, Pringle MJ, Butler DW, Henry BK, Bishop TFA, et al. 2016. Effects of land-use change and management on soil carbon and nitrogen in the Brigalow Belt, Australia: I. Overview and inventory. The Rangeland Journal 38:443−52

doi: 10.1071/rj16009
[34]

Carolan R, Fornara DA. 2016. Soil carbon cycling and storage along a chronosequence of re-seeded grasslands: do soil carbon stocks increase with grassland age? Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 218:126−32

doi: 10.1016/J.AGEE.2015.11.021
[35]

Clairotte M, Grinand C, Kouakoua E, Thébault A, Saby NPA, et al. 2016. National calibration of soil organic carbon concentration using diffuse infrared reflectance spectroscopy. Geoderma 276:41−52

doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.04.021
[36]

Fornara DA, Wasson EA, Christie P, Watson CJ. 2016. Long-term nutrient fertilization and the carbon balance of permanent grassland: any evidence for sustainable intensification? Biogeosciences 13:4975−84

doi: 10.5194/bg-2016-224
[37]

Poeplau C. 2016. Estimating root: shoot ratio and soil carbon inputs in temperate grasslands with the RothC model. Plant and Soil 407:293−305

doi: 10.1007/s11104-016-3017-8
[38]

de Souza DM, de Oliveira Morais PA, Matsushige I, Rosa LA. 2016. Development of alternative methods for determining soil organic matter. Revista Brasileira De Ciência Do Solo 40:e0150150

doi: 10.1590/18069657rbcs20150150
[39]

McNally SR, Laughlin DC, Rutledge S, Dodd MB, Six J, et al. 2015. Root carbon inputs under moderately diverse sward and conventional ryegrass-clover pasture: implications for soil carbon sequestration. Plant and Soil 392:289−99

doi: 10.1007/s11104-015-2463-z
[40]

Henry BK, Butler D, Wiedemann SG. 2015. Quantifying carbon sequestration on sheep grazing land in Australia for life cycle assessment studies. The Rangeland Journal 37:379−88

doi: 10.1071/rj14109
[41]

Smith P. 2014. Do grasslands act as a perpetual sink for carbon? Global Change Biology 20:2708−11

doi: 10.1111/gcb.12561
[42]

Skinner RH, Dell CJ. 2014. Comparing pasture C sequestration estimated from eddy covariance and soil cores. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 199:52−57

doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.08.020
[43]

Pringle MJ, Allen DE, Dalal RC, Payne JE, Mayer DG, et al. 2011. Soil carbon stock in the tropical rangelands of Australia: effects of soil type and grazing pressure, and determination of sampling requirement. Geoderma 167−168:261−73

doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2011.09.001
[44]

Powlson DS, Whitmore AP, Goulding KWT. 2011. Soil carbon sequestration to mitigate climate change: a critical re-examination to identify the true and the false. European Journal of Soil Science 62:42−55

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01342.x
[45]

Amanullah. 2014. Wheat and rye differ in drymatter partitioning, shoot-root ratio and water use efficiency under organic and inorganic soils. Journal of Plant Nutrition 37:1885−97

doi: 10.1080/01904167.2014.911888
[46]

Amanullah, Stewart BA, Ullah H. 2015. Cool season C3-grasses (wheat, rye, barley, and oats) differ in shoot: root ratio when applied with different NPK sources. Journal of Plant Nutrition 38:189−201

doi: 10.1080/01904167.2014.881877
[47]

Amanullah, Khan S, Muhammad A. 2015. Beneficial microbes and phosphorus management influence dry matter partitioning and accumulation in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) with and without moisture stress condition. Journal of Microbial & Biochemical Technology 7:410−416

doi: 10.4172/1948-5948.1000247
[48]

Bert D, Danjon F. 2006. Carbon concentration variations in the roots, stem and crown of mature Pinus pinaster (Ait.). Forest Ecology and Management 222:279−95

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.030
[49]

Yao F, Chen Y, Yan Z, Li P, Han W, et al. 2015. Biogeographic patterns of structural traits and C: N: P stoichiometry of tree twigs in China's forests. PLoS One 10:e0116391

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116391
[50]

Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, et al. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist 193:30−50

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x
[51]

Amanullah, Stewart BA, Almas LK. 2016. Root: shoot ratio and water use efficiency differ in cool season cereals grown in pure and mixed stands under low and high water levels. The Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 29:52−65

[52]

Nadia, Amanullah, Arif M, Muhammad D. 2023. Improvement in wheat productivity with integrated management of beneficial microbes along with organic and inorganic phosphorus sources. Agriculture 13(6):1118

doi: 10.3390/agriculture13061118
[53]

Amanullah, Asif M, Khan A, Khalid S. 2019. Integrated management of phosphorus, organic sources, and beneficial microbes improve dry matter partitioning of maize. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 50(20):2544−69

[54]

Redin M, Recous S, Aita C, Chaves B, Pfeifer IC, et al. 2018. Root and shoot contributionto carbon and nitrogen inputsin the topsoil layer in no-tillagecrop systems under subtropicalconditions. Rev Bras Cienc Solo 42:e0170355

[55]

Amanullah, Inamullah. 2016. Dry matter partitioning and harvest index differ in rice genotypes with variable rates of phosphorus and zinc nutrition. Rice Science 23(2):78−87

doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2015.09.006
[56]

Roumet C, Lafont F, Sari M, Warembourg F, Garnier E. 2008. Root traits and taxonomic affiliation of nine herbaceous species grown in glasshouse conditions. Plant and Soil 312:69−83

doi: 10.1007/s11104-008-9635-z
[57]

Uri V, Varik M, Aosaar J, Kanal A, Kukumägi M, et al. 2012. Biomass production and carbon sequestration in a fertile silver birch (Betula pendula Roth) forest chronosequence. Forest Ecology and Management 267:117−26

doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.033
[58]

Martin AR, Thomas SC, Zhao Y. 2013. Size-dependent changes in wood chemical traits: a comparison of neotropical saplings and large trees. AoB PLANTS 5:plt039

doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plt039
[59]

Amanullah, Stewart BA. 2015. Analysis of growth response of cool season cereals "wheat vs. rye" grown in organic and inorganic soils. Emirates Journal of Food and Agriculture 27:430

doi: 10.9755/ejfa.2015.04.041
[60]

Amanullah, Shah S, Shah Z, Khalail SK, Jan A, et al. 2014. Effects of variable nitrogen source and rate on leaf area index and total dry matter accumulation in maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes under calcareous so. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 19:276−84

[61]

Amanullah, Stewart BA. 2013. Shoot: root differs in warm season c4-cereals when grown alone in pure and mixed stands under low and high water levels. Pakistan Journal of Botany 45:83−90

[62]

Bagrintseva VN, Nosov VV. 2012. Potassium nutrition for small grains grown on chestnut soils. Better Crops With Plant Food 96:29−31

[63]

Mut Z, Ayan K, Mut H. 2006. Evaluation of forage yield and quality at two phenological stages of triticale genotypes and other cereals grown under rainfed conditions. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 35:45−53

[64]

Amanullah, Khalid S, Imran, Khan HA, Arif M, et al. 2019. Organic Matter Management in Cereals Based System: Symbiosis for Improving Crop Productivity and Soil Health. In Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 29, eds. Lal R, Francaviglia R. Springer, Cham. pp. 67−92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26265-5_3

[65]

Amanullah, Hidayatullah, Jan A, Shah Z, Parmar B, et al. 2019. Organic carbon sources and nitrogen management improve biomass of hybrid rice (Oryza sativa L.) under nitrogen deficient condition. In Advances in Rice Research for Abiotic Stress Tolerance, eds. Hasanuzzaman M, Fujita M, Nahar K, Biswas JK. Chennai: Woodhead Publishing. pp: 447−68. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814332-2.00022-8

[66]

Amanullah. 2017. Effects of NPK source on the dry matter partitioning in cool season C3-cereals (wheat, rye, barley, and oats) at various growth stages. Journal of Plant Nutrition 40:352−64

doi: 10.1080/01904167.2016.1240195
[67]

Amanullah, Stewart BA. 2013. Dry matter partitioning, growth analysis and water use efficiency response of oats (Avena sativa L.) to excessive nitrogen and phosphorus application. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 15:479−89

[68]

Bolinder MA, Janzen HH, Gregorich EG, Angers DA, VandenBygaart AJ. 2007. An approach for estimating net primary productivity and annual carbon inputs to soil for common agricultural crops in Canada. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118:29−42

doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2006.05.013
[69]

Amanullah. 2017. Integrated use of organic carbon, plant nutrients and bio-fertilizers is key to improve field crops productivity under arid and semiarid climates. FAO (2017) Proceedings of the Global Symposium on Soil Organic Carbon, Rome, Italy, 21−23 March 2017. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. pp: 480−81.

[70]

Amanullah, Fahad S. 2018. Integrated nutrient management in corn production: Symbiosis for food security and grower's income in arid and semiarid climates. In Corn - Production and Human Health in Changing Climate, eds. Amanullah, Fahad S. London, UK: InTech. pp. 3−12. https://doi.org/0.5772/intechopen.80995

[71]

Lal R. 2006. Enhancing crop yields in the developing countries through restoration of the soil organic carbon pool in agricultural lands. Land Degradation & Development 17:197−209

doi: 10.1002/ldr.696
[72]

Zengeni R, Chaplot V, Shimelis H, Mathew I, Mbava N, et al. 2021. Water use efficiency and carbon sequestration potential of indigenous crops. Water Research Commission (WRC), School of Agricultural, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of KwaZulu-Natal

[73]

McKendry P. 2002. Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology 83:37−46

doi: 10.1016/s0960-8524(01)00118-3
[74]

Amanullah, Khalid S. 2020. Agronomy - food security - climate change and the sustainable development goals. In Agronomy – Climate Change & Food Security, ed. Amanullah. UK: Intech Open. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92690