Back Article

Hojsgaard D, Hörandl E. 2019. The rise of apomixis in natural plant populations. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:358

Wang N, Song X, Ye J, Zhang S, Cao Z, et al. 2022. Structural variation and parallel evolution of apomixis in citrus during domestication and diversification. National Science Review 9:nwac114

Wang X, Xu Y, Zhang S, Cao L, Huang Y, et al. 2017. Genomic analyses of primitive, wild and cultivated citrus provide insights into asexual reproduction. Nature Genetics 49:765−72

Smith J. 1841. Notice of a plant which produces perfect seeds without any apparent action of pollen. Transactions of the Linnean Society of London 18:509−12

Hojsgaard D, Klatt S, Baier R, Carman JG, Hörandl E. 2014. Taxonomy and biogeography of apomixis in angiosperms and associated biodiversity characteristics. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 33:414−27

Liu C, He Z, Zhang Y, Hu F, Li M, et al. 2023. Synthetic apomixis enables stable transgenerational transmission of heterotic phenotypes in hybrid rice. Plant Communications 4:100470

Jiang C, Sun J, Li R, Yan S, Chen W, et al. 2022. A reactive oxygen species burst causes haploid induction in maize. Molecular Plant 15:943−55

Huang X, Yang S, Gong J, Zhao Q, Feng Q, et al. 2016. Genomic architecture of heterosis for yield traits in rice. Nature 537:629−33

Ye J, Cui X. 2019. Next-generation crop breeding methods. Molecular Plant 12:470−71

Savidan Y. 2001. Gametophytic Apomixis. In Current Trends in the Embryology of Angiosperms, eds. Bhojwani SS, Soh WY. Netherlands: Springer Dordrecht. pp. 419−33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-1203-3_16

Spillane C, Curtis MD, Grossniklaus U. 2004. Apomixis technology development—virgin births in farmers' fields? Nature Biotechnology 22:687−91

Mieulet D, Jolivet S, Rivard M, Cromer L, Vernet A, et al. 2016. Turning rice meiosis into mitosis. Cell Research 26:1242−54

Mercier R, Mézard C, Jenczewski E, Macaisne N, Grelon M. 2015. The molecular biology of meiosis in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 66:297−327

Cheung AY, Duan Q, Li C, Liu MCJ, Wu HM. 2022. Pollen–pistil interactions: It takes two to tangle but a molecular cast of many to deliver. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 69:102279

Dresselhaus T, Sprunck S, Wessel GM. 2016. Fertilization mechanisms in flowering plants. Current Biology 26:R125−R139

d'Erfurth I, Jolivet S, Froger N, Catrice O, Novatchkova M, et al. 2009. Turning meiosis into mitosis. PLoS Biology 7:e1000124

Wang C, Liu Q, Shen Y, Hua Y, Wang J, et al. 2019. Clonal seeds from hybrid rice by simultaneous genome engineering of meiosis and fertilization genes. Nature Biotechnology 37:283−86

Khanday I, Skinner D, Yang B, Mercier R, Sundaresan V. 2019. A male-expressed rice embryogenic trigger redirected for asexual propagation through seeds. Nature 565:91−95

de Massy B. 2013. Initiation of meiotic recombination: how and where? Conservation and specificities among eukaryotes Annual Review of Genetics 47:563−99

Drouaud J, Khademian H, Giraut L, Zanni V, Bellalou S, et al. 2013. Contrasted patterns of crossover and non-crossover at Arabidopsis thaliana meiotic recombination hotspots. PLOS Genetics 9:e1003922

Smeds L, Mugal CF, Qvarnström A, Ellegren H. 2016. High-resolution mapping of crossover and non-crossover recombination events by whole-genome re-sequencing of an avian pedigree. PLoS Genetics 12:e1006044

Myers S, Spencer CCA, Auton A, Bottolo L, Freeman C, et al. 2006. The distribution and causes of meiotic recombination in the human genome. Biochemical Society Transactions 34:526−30

Comeron JM, Ratnappan R, Bailin S. 2012. The many landscapes of recombination in Drosophila melanogaster. PLoS Genetics 8:e1002905

Benyahya F, Nadaud I, Da Ines O, Rimbert H, White C, et al. 2020. SPO11.2 is essential for programmed double-strand break formation during meiosis in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). The Plant Journal 104:30−43

Stacey NJ, Kuromori T, Azumi Y, Roberts G, Breuer C, et al. 2006. Arabidopsis SPO11-2 functions with SPO11-1 in meiotic recombination. The Plant Journal 48:206−16

Fayos I, Meunier AC, Vernet A, Navarro-Sanz S, Portefaix M, et al. 2020. Assessment of the roles of SPO11-2 and SPO11-4 in meiosis in rice using CRISPR/Cas9 mutagenesis. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:7046−58

Steckenborn S, Cuacos M, Ayoub MA, Feng C, Schubert V, et al. 2023. The meiotic topoisomerase VI B subunit (MTOPVIB) is essential for meiotic DNA double-strand break formation in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Plant Reproduction 36:1−15

Jolivet S, Vezon D, Froger N, Mercier R. 2006. Non conservation of the meiotic function of the Ski8/Rec103 homolog in Arabidopsis. Genes Cells 11:615−22

Hyppa RW, Cromie GA, Smith GR. 2008. Indistinguishable landscapes of meiotic DNA breaks in rad50⁺ and rad50S strains of fission yeast revealed by a novel rad50⁺ recombination intermediate. PLoS Genetics 4:e1000267

Puizina J, Siroky J, Mokros P, Schweizer D, Riha K. 2004. Mre11 deficiency in Arabidopsis is associated with chromosomal instability in somatic cells and Spo11-Dependent genome fragmentation during meiosis. The Plant Cell 16:1968−78

Shi W, Ji J, Xue Z, Zhang F, Miao Y, et al. 2021. PRD1, a homologous recombination initiation factor, is involved in spindle assembly in rice meiosis. New Phytologist 230:585−600

Wang Z, Zhang Z, Zheng D, Zhang T, Li XL, et al. 2022. Efficient and genotype independent maize transformation using pollen transfected by DNA-coated magnetic nanoparticles. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:1145−56

De Muyt A, Vezon D, Gendrot G, Gallois JL, Stevens R, et al. 2007. AtPRD1 is required for meiotic double strand break formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. The EMBO Journal 26:4126−37

De Muyt A, Pereira L, Vezon D, Chelysheva L, Gendrot G, et al. 2009. A high throughput genetic screen identifies new early meiotic recombination functions in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS Genetics 5:e1000654

Zhang C, Song Y, Cheng Z, Wang Y, Zhu J, et al. 2012. The Arabidopsis thaliana DSB formation (AtDFO) gene is required for meiotic double-strand break formation. The Plant Journal 72:271−81

Nonomura KI, Nakano M, Fukuda T, Eiguchi M, Miyao A, et al. 2004. The novel gene HOMOLOGOUS PAIRING ABERRATION IN RICE MEIOSIS1 of rice encodes a putative coiled-coil protein required for homologous chromosome pairing in meiosis. The Plant Cell 16:1008−20

Miao C, Tang D, Zhang H, Wang M, Li Y, et al. 2013. CENTRAL REGION COMPONENT1, a novel synaptonemal complex component, is essential for meiotic recombination initiation in rice. The Plant Cell 25:2998−3009

Ji J, Tang D, Shen Y, Xue Z, Wang H, et al. 2016. P31^comet, a member of the synaptonemal complex, participates in meiotic DSB formation in rice. PNAS 113:10577−82

Wu Z, Ji J, Tang D, Wang H, Shen Y, et al. 2015. OsSDS is essential for DSB formation in rice meiosis. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:21

Casari E, Rinaldi C, Marsella A, Gnugnoli M, Colombo CV, et al. 2019. Processing of DNA Double-Strand Breaks by the MRX complex in a chromatin context. Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences 6:43

Uanschou C, Siwiec T, Pedrosa-Harand A, Kerzendorfer C, Sanchez-Moran E, et al. 2007. A novel plant gene essential for meiosis is related to the human CtIP and the yeast COM1/SAE2 gene. The EMBO Journal 26:5061−70

Neale MJ, Pan J, Keeney S. 2005. Endonucleolytic processing of covalent protein-linked DNA double-strand breaks. Nature 436:1053−57

Hinch AG, Becker PW, Li T, Moralli D, Zhang G, et al. 2020. The configuration of RPA, RAD51, and DMC1 binding in meiosis reveals the nature of critical recombination intermediates. Molecular Cell 79:689−701. E10

Berchowitz LE, Francis KE, Bey AL, Copenhaver GP. 2007. The role of AtMUS81 in interference-insensitive crossovers in A. thaliana. PLoS Genetics 3:e0030132

Gutiérrez Pinzón Y, González Kise JK, Rueda P, Ronceret A. 2021. The formation of bivalents and the control of plant meiotic recombination. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:717423

Chelysheva L, Vezon D, Belcram K, Gendrot G, Grelon M. 2008. The Arabidopsis BLAP75/Rmi1 homologue plays crucial roles in meiotic double-strand break repair. PLoS Genetics 4:e1000309

Hartung F, Suer S, Knoll A, Wurz-Wildersinn R, Puchta H. 2008. Topoisomerase 3α and RMI1 suppress somatic crossovers and are essential for resolution of meiotic recombination intermediates in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genetics 4:e1000285

Girard C, Crismani W, Froger N, Mazel J, Lemhemdi A, et al. 2014. FANCM-associated proteins MHF1 and MHF2, but not the other Fanconi anemia factors, limit meiotic crossovers. Nucleic Acids Research 42:9087−95

Crismani W, Girard C, Froger N, Pradillo M, Santos JL, et al. 2012. FANCM limits meiotic crossovers. Science 336:1588−90

Knoll A, Higgins JD, Seeliger K, Reha SJ, Dangel NJ, et al. 2012. The Fanconi anemia ortholog FANCM ensures ordered homologous recombination in both somatic and meiotic cells in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 24:1448−64

Chelysheva L, Diallo S, Vezon D, Gendrot G, Vrielynck N, et al. 2005. AtREC8 and AtSCC3 are essential to the monopolar orientation of the kinetochores during meiosis. Journal of Cell Science 118:4621−32

Shao T, Tang D, Wang K, Wang M, Che L, et al. 2011. OsREC8 is essential for chromatid cohesion and metaphase I monopolar orientation in rice meiosis. Plant Physiology 156:1386−96

Sun M, Nishino T, Marko JF. 2013. The SMC1-SMC3 cohesin heterodimer structures DNA through supercoiling-dependent loop formation. Nucleic Acids Research 41:6149−60

Zamariola L, de Storme N, Tiang CL, Armstrong SJ, Franklin FCH, et al. 2013. SGO1 but not SGO2 is required for maintenance of centromere cohesion in Arabidopsis thaliana meiosis. Plant Reproduction 26:197−208

Wang M, Tang D, Luo Q, Jin Y, Shen Y, et al. 2012. BRK1, a Bub1-Related Kinase, is essential for generating proper tension between homologous kinetochores at metaphase I of rice meiosis. The Plant Cell 24:4961−73

Marston AL, Amon A. 2004. Meiosis: cell-cycle controls shuffle and deal. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 5:983−97

Harashima H, Dissmeyer N, Schnittger A. 2013. Cell cycle control across the eukaryotic kingdom. Trends in Cell Biology 23:345−56

Pesin JA, Orr-Weaver TL. 2008. Regulation of APC/C activators in mitosis and meiosis. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology 24:475−99

Fisher RP, Morgan DO. 1994. A novel cyclin associates with M015/CDK7 to form the CDK-activating kinase. Cell 78:713−24

d'Erfurth I, Cromer L, Jolivet S, Girard C, Horlow C, et al. 2010. The CYCLIN-A CYCA1;2/TAM is required for the meiosis I to meiosis II transition and cooperates with OSD1 for the prophase to first meiotic division transition. PLoS Genetics 6:e1000989

Cifuentes M, Jolivet S, Cromer L, Harashima H, Bulankova P, et al. 2016. TDM1 regulation determines the number of meiotic divisions. PLoS Genetics 12:e1005856

Dissmeyer N, Nowack MK, Pusch S, Stals H, Inzé D, et al. 2007. T-Loop phosphorylation of Arabidopsis CDKA;1 is required for its function and can be partially substituted by an aspartate residue. The Plant Cell 19:972−85

Cairo A, Vargova A, Shukla N, Capitao C, Mikulkova P, et al. 2022. Meiotic exit in Arabidopsis is driven by P-body–mediated inhibition of translation. Science 377:629−34

Yao X, Hu W, Yang Z. 2022. The contributions of sporophytic tapetum to pollen formation. Seed Biology 1:5

Yang W, Shi D, Chen Y. 2010. Female gametophyte development in flowering plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:89−108

Hafidh S, Honys D. 2021. Reproduction multitasking: the male gametophyte. Annual Review of Plant Biology 72:581−614

Sprunck S. 2020. Twice the fun, double the trouble: gamete interactions in flowering plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 53:106−16

Maruyama D, Ohtsu M, Higashiyama T. 2016. Cell fusion and nuclear fusion in plants. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 60:127−35

Hamamura Y, Nishimaki M, Takeuchi H, Geitmann A, Kurihara D, et al. 2014. Live imaging of calcium spikes during double fertilization in Arabidopsis. Nature Communications 5:4722

Mori T, Igawa T, Tamiya G, Miyagishima SY, Berger F. 2014. Gamete attachment requires GEX2 for successful fertilization inArabidopsis. Current Biology 24:170−75

Misamore MJ, Gupta S, Snell WJ. 2003. The Chlamydomonas Fus1 protein is present on the mating type plus fusion organelle and required for a critical membrane adhesion event during fusion with minus gametes. Molecular Biology of the Cell 14:2530−42

Hirohashi N, Kamei N, Kubo H, Sawada H, Matsumoto M, et al. 2008. Egg and sperm recognition systems during fertilization. Development, Growth & Differentiation 50:S221−S238

Pan J, Snell WJ. 2000. Signal transduction during fertilization in the unicellular green alga, Chlamydomonas. Current Opinion in Microbiology 3:596−602

Sprunck S, Rademacher S, Vogler F, Gheyselinck J, Grossniklaus U, et al. 2012. Egg cell-secreted EC1 triggers sperm cell activation during double fertilization. Science 338:1093−97

Johnson MA, von Besser K, Zhou Q, Smith E, Aux G, et al. 2004. Arabidopsis hapless mutations define essential gametophytic functions. Genetics 168:971−82

Cyprys P, Lindemeier M, Sprunck S. 2019. Gamete fusion is facilitated by two sperm cell-expressed DUF679 membrane proteins. Nature Plants 5:253−57

Huang J, Ju Y, Wang X, Zhang Q, Sodmergen. 2015. A one-step rectification of sperm cell targeting ensures the success of double fertilization. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 57:496−503

Mori T, Kuroiwa H, Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa T. 2006. GENERATIVE CELL SPECIFIC 1 is essential for angiosperm fertilization. Nature Cell Biology 8:64−71

Liu Y, Tewari R, Ning J, Blagborough AM, Garbom S, et al. 2008. The conserved plant sterility gene HAP2 functions after attachment of fusogenic membranes in Chlamydomonas and Plasmodium gametes. Genes & Development 22:1051−68

Fedry J, Forcina J, Legrand P, Péhau-Arnaudet G, Haouz A, et al. 2018. Evolutionary diversification of the HAP2 membrane insertion motifs to drive gamete fusion across eukaryotes. PLoS Biology 16:e2006357

Kielian M, Rey FA. 2006. Virus membrane-fusion proteins: more than one way to make a hairpin. Nature Reviews Microbiology 4:67−76

Wang W, Xiong H, Zhao P, Peng X, Sun MX. 2022. DMP8 and 9 regulate HAP2/GCS1 trafficking for the timely acquisition of sperm fusion competence. PNAS 119:e2207608119

Zhang J, Yin J, Luo J, Tang D, Zhu X, et al. 2022. Construction of homozygous diploid potato through maternal haploid induction. aBIOTECH 3:163−68

Li Y, Li D, Xiao Q, Wang H, Wen J, et al. 2022. An in planta haploid induction system in Brassica napus. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:1140−44

Zhong Y, Wang Y, Chen B, Liu J, Wang D, et al. 2022. Establishment of a dmp based maternal haploid induction system for polyploid Brassica napus and Nicotiana tabacum. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:1281−94

Zhong Y, Chen B, Li M, Wang D, Jiao Y, et al. 2020. A DMP-triggered in vivo maternal haploid induction system in the dicotyledonous Arabidopsis. Nature Plants 6:466−72

Zhong Y, Liu C, Qi X, Jiao Y, Wang D, et al. 2019. Mutation of ZmDMP enhances haploid induction in maize. Nature Plants 5:575−80

Wang N, Xia X, Jiang T, Li L, Zhang P, et al. 2022. In planta haploid induction by genome editing of DMP in the model legume Medicago truncatula. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:22−24

Chen X, Li Y, Ai G, Chen J, Guo D, et al. 2023. Creation of a watermelon haploid inducer line via ClDMP3-mediated single fertilization of the central cell. Horticulture Research 10:uhad081

Zhang X, Zhang L, Zhang J, Jia M, Cao L, et al. 2022. Haploid induction in allotetraploid tobacco using DMPs mutation. Planta 255:98

Zhao X, Yuan K, Liu Y, Zhang N, Yang L, et al. 2022. In vivo maternal haploid induction based on genome editing of DMP in Brassica oleracea. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:2242−44

Yu X, Zhang X, Zhao P, Peng X, Chen H, et al. 2021. Fertilized egg cells secrete endopeptidases to avoid polytubey. Nature 592:433−37

Zhang X, Shi C, Li S, Zhang B, Luo P, et al. 2023. A female in vivo haploid-induction system via mutagenesis of egg cell-specific peptidases. Molecular Plant 16:471−80

Jiang J, Stührwohldt N, Liu T, Huang Q, Li L, et al. 2022. Egg cell-secreted aspartic proteases ECS1/2 promote gamete attachment to prioritize the fertilization of egg cells over central cells in Arabidopsis. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 64:2047−59

Zhang X, Yu X, Shi C, Dresselhaus T, Sun MX. 2023. Do egg cell-secreted aspartic proteases promote gamete attachment? Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 65:3−6

Jiang J, Qu LJ. 2023. Response to Zhang et al., 'do egg cell-secreted aspartic proteases promote gamete attachment?' Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 65:7−9

Marimuthu MPA, Jolivet S, Ravi M, Pereira L, Davda JN, et al. 2011. Synthetic clonal reproduction through seeds. Science 331:876−76

Xiong J, Hu F, Ren J, Huang Y, Liu C, Wang K. 2023. Synthetic apomixis: the beginning of a new era. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 79:102877

Ravi M, Chan SWL. 2010. Haploid plants produced by centromere-mediated genome elimination. Nature 464:615−18

Wang N, Dawe RK. 2018. Centromere size and its relationship to haploid formation in plants. Molecular Plant 11:398−406

Lv J, Yu K, Wei J, Gui H, Liu C, et al. 2020. Generation of paternal haploids in wheat by genome editing of the centromeric histone CENH3. Nature Biotechnology 38:1397−401

Maheshwari S, Tan EH, West A, Franklin FCH, Comai L, Chan SWL. 2015. Naturally occurring differences in CENH3 affect chromosome segregation in zygotic mitosis of hybrids. PLoS Genetics 11:e1004970

Kuppu S, Tan EH, Nguyen H, Rodgers A, Comai L, et al. 2015. Point mutations in centromeric histone induce post-zygotic incompatibility and uniparental inheritance. PLoS Genetics 11:e1005494

Kelliher T, Starr D, Wang W, McCuiston J, Zhong H, et al. 2016. Maternal haploids are preferentially induced by CENH3-tailswap transgenic complementation in maize. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:414

Wang Z, Chen M, Yang H, Hu Z, Yu Y, et al. 2023. A simple and highly efficient strategy to induce both paternal and maternal haploids through temperature manipulation. Nature Plants 9:699−705

Inagaki MN, Hash CT. 1998. Production of haploids in bread wheat, durum wheat and hexaploid triticale crossed with pearl millet. Plant Breeding 117:485−87

Inagaki M, Mujeeb-Kazi A. 1995. Comparison of polyhaploid production frequencies in crosses of hexaploid wheat with maize, pearl millet and sorghuml. Japanese Journal of Breeding 45:157−61

Kasha KJ, Kao KN. 1970. High frequency haploid production in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Nature 225:874−76

Laurie DA. 1989. The frequency of fertilization in wheat × pearl millet crosses. Genome 32:1063−67

Gernand D, Rutten T, Varshney A, Rubtsova M, Prodanovic S, et al. 2005. Uniparental chromosome elimination at mitosis and interphase in wheat and pearl millet crosses involves micronucleus formation, progressive heterochromatinization, and DNA fragmentation. The Plant Cell 17:2431−38

Mochida K, Tsujimoto H, Sasakuma T. 2004. Confocal analysis of chromosome behavior in wheat × maize zygotes. Genome 47:199−205

Coe EH Jr. 1959. A line of maize with high haploid frequency. The American Naturalist 93:381−82

Liu C, Li X, Meng D, Zhong Y, Chen C, et al. 2017. A 4-bp insertion at ZmPLA1 encoding a putative phospholipase a generates haploid induction in maize. Molecular Plant 10:520−22

Gilles LM, Khaled A, Laffaire JB, Chaignon S, Gendrot G, et al. 2017. Loss of pollen-specific phospholipase NOT LIKE DAD triggers gynogenesis in maize. The EMBO Journal 36:707−17

Dong X, Xu X, Miao J, Li L, Zhang D, et al. 2013. Fine mapping of qhir1 influencing in vivo haploid induction in maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126:1713−20

Kelliher T, Starr D, Richbourg L, Chintamanani S, Delzer B, et al. 2017. MATRILINEAL, a sperm-specific phospholipase, triggers maize haploid induction. Nature 542:105−9

Li X, Meng D, Chen S, Luo H, Zhang Q, et al. 2017. Single nucleus sequencing reveals spermatid chromosome fragmentation as a possible cause of maize haploid induction. Nature Communications 8:991

Liu H, Wang K, Jia Z, Gong Q, Lin Z, et al. 2019. Efficient induction of haploid plants in wheat by editing of TaMTL using an optimized Agrobacterium-mediated CRISPR system. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:1337−49

Cheng Z, Sun Y, Yang S, Zhi H, Yin T, et al. 2021. Establishing in planta haploid inducer line by edited SiMTL in foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Plant Biotechnology Journal 19:1089−91

La Camera S, Geoffroy P, Samaha H, Ndiaye A, Rahim G, et al. 2005. A pathogen-inducible patatin-like lipid acyl hydrolase facilitates fungal and bacterial host colonization in Arabidopsis. The Plant Journal 44:810−25

Jang JH, Seo HS, Widiez T, Lee OR. 2023. Loss-of-function of gynoecium-expressed phospholipase pPLAIIγ triggers maternal haploid induction in Arabidopsis. New Phytologist 238:1813−24

Li Y, Lin Z, Yue Y, Zhao H, Fei X, et al. 2021. Loss-of-function alleles of ZmPLD3 cause haploid induction in maize. Nature Plants 7:1579−88

Conner JA, Mookkan M, Huo H, Chae K, Ozias-Akins P. 2015. A parthenogenesis gene of apomict origin elicits embryo formation from unfertilized eggs in a sexual plant. PNAS 112:11205−10

Chen B, Maas L, Figueiredo D, Zhong Y, Reis R, et al. 2022. BABY BOOM regulates early embryo and endosperm development. PNAS 119:e2201761119

Horstman A, Willemsen V, Boutilier K, Heidstra R. 2014. AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE proteins: hubs in a plethora of networks. Trends in Plant Science 19:146−57

Akiyama Y, Goel S, Conner JA, Hanna WW, Yamada-Akiyama H, Ozias-Akins P. 2011. Evolution of the apomixis transmitting chromosome in Pennisetum. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11:289

Conner JA, Goel S, Gunawan G, Cordonnier-Pratt MM, Johnson VE, et al. 2008. Sequence analysis of bacterial artificial chromosome clones from the apospory-specific genomic region of Pennisetum and Cenchrus. Plant Physiology 147:1396−411

Conner JA, Ozias-Akins P. 2017. Apomixis: engineering the ability to harness hybrid vigor in crop plants. Methods in Molecular Biology 1669:17−34

Zhang Z, Conner J, Guo Y, Ozias-Akins P. 2020. Haploidy in tobacco induced by PsASGR-BBML transgenes via parthenogenesis. Genes 11:1072

Conner JA, Podio M, Ozias-Akins P. 2017. Haploid embryo production in rice and maize induced by PsASGR-BBML transgenes. Plant Reproduction 30:41−52

Horstman A, Bemer M, Boutilier K. 2017. A transcriptional view on somatic embryogenesis. Regeneration 4:201−16

Khanday I, Santos-Medellín C, Sundaresan V. 2023. Somatic embryo initiation by rice BABY BOOM1 involves activation of zygote-expressed auxin biosynthesis genes. New Phytologist 238:673−87

Vernet A, Meynard D, Lian Q, Mieulet D, Gibert O, et al. 2022. High-frequency synthetic apomixis in hybrid rice. Nature Communications 13:7963

Wei X, Liu C, Chen X, Lu H, Wang J, et al. 2023. Synthetic apomixis with normal hybrid rice seed production. Molecular Plant 16:489−92

Underwood CJ, Vijverberg K, Rigola D, Okamoto S, Oplaat C, et al. 2022. A PARTHENOGENESIS allele from apomictic dandelion can induce egg cell division without fertilization in lettuce. Nature Genetics 54:84−93

Borges F, Gomes G, Gardner R, Moreno N, McCormick S, et al. 2008. Comparative transcriptomics of Arabidopsis sperm cells. Plant Physiology 148:1168−81

Hand ML, Koltunow AMG. 2014. The genetic control of apomixis: asexual seed formation. Genetics 197:441−50

Noyes RD, Rieseberg LH. 2000. Two independent loci control agamospermy (apomixis) in the triploid flowering plant Erigeron annuus. Genetics 155:379−90

Bicknell RA, Borst NK, Koltunow AM. 2000. Monogenic inheritance of apomixis in two Hieracium species with distinct developmental mechanisms. Heredity 84:228−37

Tas ICQ, van Dijk PJ. 1999. Crosses between sexual and apomictic dandelions (Taraxacum). I. The inheritance of apomixis. Heredity 83(Pt 6):707−14

Henderson ST, Johnson SD, Eichmann J, Koltunow AMG. 2017. Genetic analyses of the inheritance and expressivity of autonomous endosperm formation in Hieracium with different modes of embryo sac and seed formation. Annals of Botany 119:1001−10

Guitton AE, Page DR, Chambrier P, Lionnet C, Faure JE, et al. 2004. Identification of new members of Fertilisation Independent Seed Polycomb Group pathway involved in the control of seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 131:2971−81

Grossniklaus U, Vielle-Calzada JP, Hoeppner MA, Gagliano WB. 1998. Maternal control of embryogenesis by MEDEA, a Polycomb group gene in Arabidopsis. Science 280:446−50

Luo M, Bilodeau P, Koltunow A, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ, et al. 1999. Genes controlling fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:296−301

Ohad N, Yadegari R, Margossian L, Hannon M, Michaeli D, et al. 1999. Mutations in FIE, a WD polycomb group gene, allow endosperm development without fertilization. The Plant Cell 11:407−15

Köhler C, Hennig L, Bouveret R, Gheyselinck J, Grossniklaus U, et al. 2003. Arabidopsis MSI1 is a component of the MEA/FIE Polycomb group complex and required for seed development. The EMBO Journal 22:4804−14

Luo M, Bilodeau P, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ, Chaudhury A. 2000. Expression and parent-of-origin effects for FIS2, MEA, and FIE in the endosperm and embryo of developing Arabidopsis seeds. PNAS 97:10637−42

Chaudhury AM, Ming L, Miller C, Craig S, Dennis ES, et al. 1997. Fertilization-independent seed development in Arabidopsis thaliana. PNAS 94:4223−28

Cheng X, Pan M, E Z, Zhou Y, Niu B, et al. 2020. Functional divergence of two duplicated Fertilization Independent Endosperm genes in rice with respect to seed development. The Plant Journal 104:124−37

Tonosaki K, Ono A, Kunisada M, Nishino M, Nagata H, et al. 2020. Mutation of the imprinted gene OsEMF2a induces autonomous endosperm development and delayed cellularization in rice. The Plant Cell 33:85−103

Springer NM, Danilevskaya ON, Hermon P, Helentjaris TG, Phillips RL, et al. 2002. Sequence relationships, conserved domains, and expression patterns for maize homologs of the polycomb group genes E(z), esc, and E(Pc). Plant Physiology 128:1332−45

Luo M, Platten D, Chaudhury A, Peacock WJ, Dennis ES. 2009. Expression, imprinting, and evolution of rice homologs of the polycomb group genes. Molecular Plant 2:711−23

Kapazoglou A, Tondelli A, Papaefthimiou D, Ampatzidou H, Francia E, et al. 2010. Epigenetic chromatin modifiers in barley: IV. The study of barley Polycomb group (PcG) genes during seed development and in response to external ABA. BMC Plant Biology 10:73

Li S, Zhou B, Peng X, Kuang Q, Huang X, et al. 2014. OsFIE2 plays an essential role in the regulation of rice vegetative and reproductive development. New Phytologist 201:66−79

Derkacheva M, Hennig L. 2013. Variations on a theme: Polycomb group proteins in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 65:2769−84

Hsieh TF, Shin J, Uzawa R, Silva P, Cohen S, et al. 2011. Regulation of imprinted gene expression in Arabidopsis endosperm. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108:1755−62

Figueiredo DD, Batista RA, Roszak PJ, Köhler C. 2015. Auxin production couples endosperm development to fertilization. Nature Plants 1:15184

Xu X, E Z, Zhang D, Yun Q, Zhou Y, et al. 2020. OsYUC11-mediated auxin biosynthesis is essential for endosperm development of rice. Plant Physiology 185:934−50

Sun X, Ling S, Lu Z, Ouyang Y, Liu S, Yao J. 2014. OsNF-YB1, a rice endosperm-specific gene, is essential for cell proliferation in endosperm development. Gene 551:214−21

Bernardi J, Lanubile A, Li Q-B, Kumar D, Kladnik A, et al. 2012. Impaired auxin biosynthesis in the defective endosperm18 mutant is due to mutational loss of expression in the ZmYuc1 gene encoding endosperm-specific YUCCA1 protein in maize. Plant Physiology 160:1318−28

Luo M, Wu X, Xie L, Sun X, Wang N, et al. 2023. Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) suppresses asexual embryo and autonomous endosperm formation in rice. Research Square Preprint

Xiong H, Wang W, Sun MX. 2021. Endosperm development is an autonomously programmed process independent of embryogenesis. The Plant Cell 33:1151−60

Zhang T. 2021. Autonomous endosperm development in embryo-free seeds. The Plant Cell 33:1091−92

Duan B, Zhou C, Zhu C, Yu Y, Li G, et al. 2019. Model-based understanding of single-cell CRISPR screening. Nature Communications 10:2233

Lo A, Qi L. 2017. Genetic and epigenetic control of gene expression by CRISPR-Cas systems. F1000Research 6:747