| [1] |
Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszki J. 2019. Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 45(2):162−70 doi: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.009 |
| [2] |
Fraser N, Brierley L, Dey G, Polka JK, Pálfy M, et al. 2021. The evolving role of preprints in the dissemination of COVID-19 research and their impact on the science communication landscape. PLoS Biology 19(4):e3000959 doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000959 |
| [3] |
Xu F, Ou G, Ma T, Wang X. 2021. The consistency of impact of preprints and their journal publications. Journal of Informetrics 15(2):101153 doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2021.101153 |
| [4] |
Smart P. 2022. The evolution, benefits, and challenges of preprints and their interaction with journals. Science Editing 9(1):79−84 doi: 10.6087/kcse.269 |
| [5] |
Sheldon T. 2018. Preprints could promote confusion and distortion. Nature 559:445 doi: 10.1038/d41586-018-05789-4 |
| [6] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2018. The preprint debate: what are the issues? Medical Journal Armed Forces India 74(2):162−4 |
| [7] |
Weissgerber T, Riedel N, Kilicoglu H, Labbé C, Eckmann P, et al. 2021. Automated screening of COVID-19 preprints: Can we help authors to improve transparency and reproducibility? Nature Medicine 27(1):6−7 doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-01203-7 |
| [8] |
ASAPbio. 2023. List of preprint servers: policies and practices across platforms. https://asapbio.org/preprint-servers (last accessed: 19 August 2023) |
| [9] |
Klebel T, Reichmann S, Polka J, McDowell G, Penfold N, et al. 2020. Peer review and preprint policies are unclear at most major journals. PLoS One 15(10):e0239518 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239518 |
| [10] |
Malički M, Jerončić A, Ter Riet G, Bouter LM, Ioannidis JPA, et al. 2020. Preprint servers' policies, submission requirements, and transparency in reporting and research integrity recommendations. JAMA 324(18):1901−3 doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17195 |
| [11] |
Teixeira da Silva JA, Nazarovets S. 2023. Most preprint servers allow the publication of opinion papers. Open Information Science 7(1):20220144 doi: 10.1515/opis-2022-0144 |
| [12] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2023. Do peer-reviewed papers with a preprint version have an unfair metrics advantage? Journal of Food Science 88(7):2738−39 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16707 |
| [13] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2022. Anonymity in anonymized peer review is incompatible with preprints. European Science Editing 48:e91290 doi: 10.3897/ese.2022.e91290 |
| [14] |
Cabanac G, Labbé C, Magazinov. 2021. Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals. arXiv Pre-print doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.06751 |
| [15] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2023. 'Tortured phrases' in preprints. Current Medical Research & Opinion 39(5):785−87 doi: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2201098 |
| [16] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2016. Silent or stealth retractions, the dangerous voices of the unknown, deleted literature. Publishing Research Quarterly 32(1):44−53 doi: 10.1007/s12109-015-9439-y |
| [17] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2021. Silently withdrawn or retracted preprints related to Covid-19 are a scholarly threat and a potential public health risk: Theoretical arguments and suggested recommendations. Online Information Review 45(4):751−57 doi: 10.1108/OIR-08-2020-0371 |
| [18] |
Elliott MJ, Poelen JH, Fortes JAB. 2023. Signing data citations enables data verification and citation persistence. Scientific Data 10:419 doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02230-y |
| [19] |
COPE. 2019. Retraction guidelines. https://publicationethics.org/files/retraction-guidelines.pdf (November 2019; last accessed: 19 August 2023) |
| [20] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2022. Should preprints and peer-reviewed papers be assigned equal status? Journal of Visceral Surgery 159(5):444−45 doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.08.003 |
| [21] |
Powell JL. 2023. Peer review and the pillar of salt: A case study. Research Ethics 19(1):78−89 doi: 10.1177/17470161221131491 |
| [22] |
Retraction Watch database. 2023. http://retractiondatabase.org/ (last accessed: 19 August 2023) |
| [23] |
Powell JL. 2022. Sodom and skepticism. Advance preprint doi: 10.31124/advance.19380077 |
| [24] |
Teixeira da Silva JA. 2022. A synthesis of the formats for correcting erroneous and fraudulent academic literature, and associated challenges. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 53:583−99 doi: 10.1007/s10838-022-09607-4 |
| [25] |
Teixeira da Silva JA, Vuong QH. 2022. Fortification of retraction notices to improve their transparency and usefulness. Learned Publishing 35(2):292−99 doi: 10.1002/leap.1409 |
| [26] |
Xu SB, Hu G. 2022. Non-author entities accountable for retractions: A diachronic and cross-disciplinary exploration of reasons for retraction. Learned Publishing 35(2):261−70 doi: 10.1002/leap.1445 |
| [27] |
Avissar-Whiting M. 2022. Downstream retraction of preprinted research in the life and medical sciences. PLoS One 17(5):e0267971 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0267971 |
| [28] |
Penfold NC, Polka JK. 2020. Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences. PLoS Genetics 16(4):e1008565 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008565 |
| [29] |
Moshontz H, Binion G, Walton H, Brown BT, Syed M. 2021. A guide to posting and managing preprints. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 4(2):1−11 doi: 10.1177/25152459211019948 |