[1] |
Zhang X, Zhang Z, Zhou R, Wang Q, Wang L. 2020. Ratooning annual cotton (Gossypium spp.) for perennial utilization of heterosis. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:554970 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.554970 |
[2] |
Adeleke AA. 2023. A review of plastic contamination challenges and mitigation efforts in cotton and textile milling industries. AgriEngineering 5(1):193−217 doi: 10.3390/agriengineering5010014 |
[3] |
Radhakrishnan S. 2017. Sustainable cotton production. Sustainable cotton production. In Sustainable Fibres and Textiles, ed. Muthu SS. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing. pp. 21–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-102041-8.00002-0 |
[4] |
World Wildlife Fund (WWF). n.d. Cotton. www.worldwildlife.org/industries/cotton (Accessed on 25 October 2023). |
[5] |
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2019. Cotton sector at a glance. Washington, DC: USDA National Agricultural Statistics Service. www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/cotton-wool/cotton-sector-at-a-glance/ (Reviewed on 22 Sept. 2020). |
[6] |
Adeleke AA, Hardin IV RG, Pelletier MG. 2021. Design of a plastic removal system for a cotton gin module feeder. In Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, Virtual, 5–7 January 2021. Cordova, TN, USA: National Cotton Council. www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2005-2022/index.htm |
[7] |
Yang Z, Tang J, Yu M, Zhang Y, Abbas A, et al. 2022. Sustainable cotton production through increased competitiveness: analysis of comparative advantage and influencing factors of cotton production in Xinjiang, China. Agronomy 12(10):2239 doi: 10.3390/agronomy12102239 |
[8] |
Reller A, Gerstenberg J. 1997. White gold, where to go? Status and prospects of cotton use Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 6(1):35−51 doi: 10.14512/gaia.6.1.5 |
[9] |
World Wildlife Fund (WWF). 1999. The impact of cotton on fresh water resources and ecosystems. https://wwfint.awsassets.panda.org/downloads/impact_long.pdf (Accessed on 25 Oct. 2023). |
[10] |
Zhou RY. 2016. Method of producing hybrid seeds for annual cotton by cultivating perennially. US Patent, US9265206B2. |
[11] |
Zhang T, Xuan L, Mao Y, Hu Y. 2023. Cotton heterosis and hybrid cultivar development. Theor Appl Genet 136:89 doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04334-w |
[12] |
Wang J, Du G, Tian J, Jiang C, Zhang Y, et al. 2021. Mulched drip irrigation increases cotton yield and water use efficiency via improving fine root plasticity. Agricultural Water Management 255:106992 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106992 |
[13] |
Blaise D, Manikandan A, Desouza ND, Bhargavi B, Somasundaram J. 2021. Intercropping and mulching in rain-dependent cotton can improve soil structure and reduce erosion. Environmental Advances 4:100068 doi: 10.1016/j.envadv.2021.100068 |
[14] |
Iqbal R, Habib-ur-Rahman M, Raza MAS, Waqas M, Ikram MR, et al. 2021. Assessing the potential of partial root zone drying and mulching for improving the productivity of cotton under arid climate. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:66223−41 doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15259-6 |
[15] |
McKinion JM, Jenkins JN, Akins D, Turner SB, Willers JL, et al. 2001. Analysis of a precision agriculture approach to cotton production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 32(3):213−28 doi: 10.1016/S0168-1699(01)00166-1 |
[16] |
Neupane J, Guo W, West CP, Zhang F, Lin Z. 2021. Effects of irrigation rates on cotton yield as affected by soil physical properties and topography in the southern high plains. PLoS ONE 16(10):e0258496 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258496 |
[17] |
Sui R, Thomasson JA, Ge Y. 2012. Development of sensor systems for precision agriculture in cotton. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering 5(4):1−14 doi: 10.3965/j.ijabe.20120504.00 |
[18] |
Hardin IV RG, Searcy SW. 2010. Autonomous module builder. National Cotton Council, Beltwide Cotton Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, January 4−7, 2010. Cordova, TN, USA: National Cotton Council. pp. 558−69. www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2005-2022/data/conferences/2010/papers/10234.pdf |
[19] |
Han X, Thomasson JA, Wang T, Swaminathan V. 2020. Autonomous mobile ground control point improves accuracy of agricultural remote sensing through collaboration with UAV. Inventions 5:12 doi: 10.3390/inventions5010012 |
[20] |
Wang Y, Zhu X, Ji C. 2008. Machine Vision Based Cotton Recognition for Cotton Harvesting Robot. In Computer And Computing Technologies In Agriculture, Volume II. CCTA 2007. The International Federation for Information Processing, ed. Li D. Vol 259. Boston, MA: Springer. pp. 1421–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77253-0_92 |
[21] |
Wang M, Wei J, Yuan J, Xu K. A research for intelligent cotton picking robot based on machine vision. 2008 International Conference on Information and Automation, Changsha, China, 2008. US: IEEE. pp. 800−3. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICINFA.2008.4608107 |
[22] |
Deere and Company. 2014. Products: CP690 cotton picker. www.deere.com/assets/pdfs/region-1/parts-and-service/quick-reference-guides/at_CP690_QRG_KK11529.pdf (Accessed on 26 October 2023). |
[23] |
Willcutt MH. 2011. New cotton harvesters benefit growers. Engineering and Technology for Sustainable World 18(5):22−23 |
[24] |
Maja JM, Polak M, Burce ME, Barnes E. 2021. CHAP: Cotton-harvesting autonomous platform. AgriEngineering 3:199−217 doi: 10.3390/agriengineering3020013 |
[25] |
O’Neill C, McCann M, Syam U. 2023. America is using up its groundwater like there's no tomorrow. The New York Times. www.nytimes.com/interactive/2023/08/28/climate/groundwater-drying-climate-change.html (Accessed on November 4, 2023) |
[26] |
Wanjura JD, Parnell CB, Shaw BW, Capareda SC. 2006. Source testing of particulate matter emissions from cotton harvesters–system design. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, Texas, 3−6 January 2006. Cordova, TN, USA: National Cotton Council. pp. 370−78. www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2005-2022/index.htm |
[27] |
CottonWorks. n.d. Sustainable cotton production. https://cottonworks.com/en/topics/sustainability/cotton-sustainability/cotton-sustainability-basics/ (accessed on November 4, 2023) |
[28] |
Blaise D, Venugopalan MV, Raju AR. 2014. Introduction of Bt cotton hybrids in India: Did it change the agronomy? Indian Journal of Agronomy 59:1−20 doi: 10.59797/ija.v59i1.4534 |
[29] |
Venugopalan MV, Sankaranarayanan K, Blaise D, Nalayini P, Prahraj CS, et al. 2009. Bt cotton (Gossypium sp. ) in India and its agronomic requirements - a review. Indian Journal of Agronomy 54(4):343−60 doi: 10.59797/ija.v54i4.4809 |
[30] |
Drishti. n.d. India's cotton story. www.drishtiias.com/printpdf/india-s-cotton-story (Accessed on November 4, 2023). |
[31] |
Feng L, Dai J, Tian L, Zhang H, Li W, et al. 2017. Review of the technology for high-yielding and efficient cotton cultivation in the northwest inland cotton-growing region of China. Field Crops Research 208:18−26 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.03.008 |
[32] |
James C. 2006. Global status of commercialized biotech/GMCrops: 2006. ISAAA Briefs No. 35, International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications, Ithaca, NY. www.isaaa.org/resources/Publications/briefs/35/highlights/default.html |
[33] |
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). n.d. Recent trends in GE adoption. www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/adoption-of-genetically-engineered-crops-in-the-u-s/recent-trends-in-ge-adoption (Accessed on November 4, 2023). |
[34] |
Pray C, Ma D, Huang J, Qiao F. 2001. Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Development 29(5):813−25 doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00010-9 |
[35] |
International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC). 2009. Biotech cotton and technology fee. ICAC Recorder 27(1):4–8 https://staging.icac.org/cotton_info/tis/biotech/documents/recorderdocs/march_2009.pdf |
[36] |
International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA). 2019. Brief 55: Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2019. www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/briefs/55/ (Accessed on November 5, 2023). |
[37] |
Thilakarathna MS, Raizada MN. 2018. Challenges in using precision agriculture to optimize symbiotic nitrogen fixation in legumes: progress, limitations, and future improvements needed in diagnostic testing. Agronomy 8(5):78 doi: 10.3390/agronomy8050078 |
[38] |
Xu W, Chen P, Zhan Y, Chen S, Zhan L, et al. 2021. Cotton yield estimation model based on machine learning using time series UAV remote sensing data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 104:102511 doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2021.102511 |
[39] |
Duke HR, Sadler EJ. 1992. Linear move irrigation system for fertilizer management research. Proceeding of the International Exposition and Technical Conference, 1992. Fairfax, VA, USA: The Irrigation Association. pp. 72–81. |
[40] |
McCann IR, Stark JC. 1993. Method and apparatus for variable application of irrigation water and chemicals. US Patent 5, 246, 164. September 21, 1993. |
[41] |
Camp CR, Sadler EJ. 1994. Center pivot irrigation system for site-specific water and nutrient management. ASAE International Winter Meeting, Paper 94-1586. St. Joseph, MI: American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). www.ars.usda.gov/ARSUserFiles/60820000/Manuscripts/1994/Man332.pdf |
[42] |
Yeom J, Jung J, Chang A, Maeda M, Landivar J. 2018. Automated open cotton boll detection for yield estimation using unmanned aircraft vehicle (UAV) data. Remote Sensing 10(12):1895 doi: 10.3390/rs10121895 |
[43] |
Sun S, Li C, Paterson AH, Jiang Y, Xu R, et al. 2018. In-field high throughput phenotyping and cotton plant growth analysis using LIDAR. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:16 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00016 |
[44] |
Großkinsky DK, Pieruschka R, Svensgaard J, Rascher U, Christensen S, et al. 2015. Phenotyping in the fields: dissecting the genetics of quantitative traits and digital farming. New Phytologist 207:950−52 doi: 10.1111/nph.13529 |
[45] |
Wu J, Wen S, Lan Y, Yin X, Zhang J, et al. 2022. Estimation of cotton canopy parameters based on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) oblique photography. Plant Methods 18:129 doi: 10.1186/s13007-022-00966-z |
[46] |
Hardin IV RG, Huang Y, Poe R. 2018. Detecting plastic trash in a cotton field with a UAV. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences, San Antonio, TX, USA, Jan. 3−5, 2018. TN, USA: National Cotton Council, Cordova. www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2005-2022/index.htm |
[47] |
Zhai Z, Chen X, Zhang R, Qiu F, Meng Q, et al. 2022. Evaluation of residual plastic film pollution in pre-sowing cotton field using UAV imaging and semantic segmentation. Frontiers in Plant Science 13 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.991191 |
[48] |
Mandal DK, Mandal C, Venugopalan MV. 2005. Suitability of cotton cultivation in shrink-swell soils in central India. Agricultural Systems 84(1):55−75 doi: 10.1016/j.agsy.2004.06.010 |
[49] |
Fereres E, Goldhamer D. 1991. Plastic mulch increases cotton yield, reduces need for preseason irrigation. California Agriculture 45(3):25−28 doi: 10.3733/ca.v045n03p25 |
[50] |
Dong HZ, Mao SC, Zhang WF, Chen DH. 2014. The theory for optimization of cotton boll cultivation and its development. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 47:441−51 (in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2014.03.004 |
[51] |
Goebel TS, Lascano RJ. 2019. Rainwater use by cotton under subsurface drip and center pivot irrigation. Agric. Agricultural Water Management 215:1−7 doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.12.027 |
[52] |
Okasha AM, Deraz N, Elmetwalli AH, Elsayed S, Falah MW, et al. 2022. Effects of irrigation method and water flow rate on irrigation performance, soil salinity, yield, and water productivity of cauliflower. Agriculture 12(8):1164 doi: 10.3390/agriculture12081164 |
[53] |
Bell S, Koc AB, Maja JM, Payero J, Khalilian A, et al. 2022. Development of an automated linear move fertigation system for cotton using active remote sensing. AgriEngineering 4:320−34 doi: 10.3390/agriengineering4010022 |
[54] |
Ran J, Ren Y, Guo W, Hu C, Wang X. 2023. Aging characteristics of drip irrigation belt in Xinjiang cotton fields and their effects on its recovery and recycling. Scientific Reports 13:16948 doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43094-x |
[55] |
Liang J. 2015. Xinjiang integration of water and fertilizer technology application present situation and the development countermeasures. Xinjiang Farm Research of Science and Technology 38(1):38−40 doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-361X.2015.01.028 |
[56] |
Certi-PIK. Brief history of cotton pickers & harvester parts. https://certipik.com/2017/10/23/a-look-at-the-history-of-cotton-pickers-and-the-advancement-of-cotton-harvester-parts/ (Accessed on November 4, 2023). |
[57] |
Bennett JMcL, Woodhouse NP, Keller T, Jensen TA, Antille DL. 2015. Advances in cotton harvesting technology: a review and implications for the John Deere round baler cotton picker. The Journal of Cotton Science 19:225−49 |
[58] |
EOA. n.d. John Daniel Rust (1892−1954). https://encyclopediaofarkansas.net/entries/john-daniel-rust-2272/ (Accessed on November 4, 2023). |
[59] |
Barnes E, Morgan G, Hake K, Devine J, Kurtz R, et al. 2021. Opportunities for robotic systems and automation in cotton production. AgriEngineering 3(2):339−62 doi: 10.3390/agriengineering3020023 |
[60] |
Alish-o‘g‘li MK, Khusanovna MZ. 2022. Research cotton mechanization in Asian countries. JournalNX 8(3):22−30 |
[61] |
Lamm RD, Slaughter DC, Giles DK. 2002. Precision weed control system for cotton. Transactions of the ASAE 45(1):231−38 doi: 10.13031/2013.7861 |
[62] |
Cotton Australia. n.d. Organic Cotton. https://cottonaustralia.com.au/organic-cotton (Accessed on November 4, 2023) |
[63] |
Khadi BM. 2022. High density planting system–next revolution in cotton farming in India. World Cotton Research Conference 7, Cairo, Egypt, October 5, 2022. Washington DC, USA: International Cotton Advisory Committe. www.atpbr.com/doc/webinar/Webinar-19-PPT.pdf (Accessed on November 4, 2023) |
[64] |
Farooq O, Mubeen K, Khan AA, Ahmad S. 2020. Sowing methods for cotton production. In Cotton Production and Uses, eds. Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M. Singapore: Springer. pp 45–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_4 |
[65] |
Krause U, Koch HJ, Maerlaender B. 2009. Soil properties effecting yield formation in sugar beet under ridge and flat cultivation. European Journal of Agronomy 31(1):20−28 doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2009.02.002 |
[66] |
Bayer Group. 2019. Optimum cotton planting conditions and seed placement. www.cropscience.bayer.us/articles/dad/optimum-cotton-planting-conditions-and-seed-placement (Accessed 26 January 2024) |
[67] |
Silvertooth JC. 2000. Planting methods and soil temperature. Arizona Cotton Comments. https://ag.arizona.edu/crop/cotton/comments/jan2000cc.html (Accessed 26 January 2024) |
[68] |
Cotton Farming. 2015. Want to save money? Plant on flat beds. Available online: www.cottonfarming.com/special-report/want-to-save-money-plant-on-flat-beds/ (Accessed 26 January 2024). |
[69] |
Ahmad N, Arshad M, Shahid MA. 2009. Bed-furrow system to replace conventional flood irrigation in Pakistan. Proceedings of 59th IEC meeting and 20th ICID conference held at New Delhi, India. pp. 6–11. |
[70] |
Iftikhar T, Babar LK, Zahoor S, Khan NG. 2010. Impact of land pattern and hydrological properties of soil on cotton yield. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42:3023–28 www.pakbs.org/pjbot/PDFs/42(5)/PJB42(5)3023.pdf |
[71] |
Sayre KD. 2000. Effects of tillage, crop residue retention and nitrogen management on the performance of bed-planted, furrow irrigated spring wheat in northwest Mexico. Proceeding of 15th conference of the international soil tillage research organization, 2–7 July 2000, Fort Worth, TX. Painter, VA, USA: International Soil and Tillage Research Organization. |
[72] |
Hobbs PR, Gupta RK. 2003. Resource conserving technologies for wheat in the rice–wheat system. In Improving the productivity and sustainability of rice–wheat systems: issues and impact, eds. Ladha JK, Hill JE, Duxbury JM, Gupta RK, Buresh RJ. vol. 65. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. pp 149–71. https://doi.org/10.2134/asaspecpub65.c7 |
[73] |
Kumar N, Upadhyay G, Choudhary S, Patel B, Naresh S, et al. 2023. Resource conserving mechanization technologies for dryland agriculture. In Enhancing resilience of dryland agriculture under changing climate, eds. Naorem A, Machiwal D. Singapore: Springer. pp. 657–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-9159-2_33 |
[74] |
JPlovesCOTTON LLC. n.d. Cotton 101: cotton planting considerations. https://hundredpercentcotton.com/cotton/cotton-101-planting/ (Accessed 26 January 2024) |
[75] |
Boquet DJ. 2005. Cotton in ultra-narrow row spacing: plant density and nitrogen fertilizer rates. Agronomy Journal 97:279−87 doi: 10.2134/agronj2005.0279 |
[76] |
Jahedi MB, Vazin F, Ramezani MR. 2013. Effect of row spacing on the yield of cotton cultivars. Cercetari Agronomice in Moldova 46:31−38 doi: 10.2478/v10298-012-0101-y |
[77] |
Cropwatch. n.d. Ridge plant. https://cropwatch.unl.edu/tillage/ridge (Accessed 27 January 2024) |
[78] |
Gürsoy S, Sessiz A, Karademir E, Karademir C, Kolay B, et al. 2011. Effects of ridge and conventional tillage systems on soil properties and cotton growth. Interational Journal of Plant Production 5(3):227−36 |
[79] |
Hussain T, Jehanzeb, Tariq M, Siddiqui BN. 2003. Effect of different irrigation levels on the yield and yield components of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under two sowing methods. Journal of Biological Sciences 3:655−59 doi: 10.3923/jbs.2003.655.659 |
[80] |
Ali M, Ali L, Sattar M, Ali MA. 2012. Response of seed cotton yield to various plant populations and planting methods. Journal of Agricultural Research 48(2):163−69 |
[81] |
Ahmad S, Iqbal M, Muhammad T, Mehmood A, Ahmad S, et al. 2018. Cotton productivity enhanced through transplanting and early sowing. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences 40:e34610 doi: 10.4025/actascibiolsci.v40i1.34610 |
[82] |
Kumar R, Sharma SK, Yadav S. 2015. Effect of transplanting date on growth and yield of Bt cotton. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 85(11):1453−57 |
[83] |
Singh K, Singh H, Singh K, Rathore P. 2013. Effect of transplanting and seedling age on growth, yield attributes and seed cotton yield of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(5):503−13 |
[84] |
Pettigrew WT. 2002. Improved yield potential with an early planting cotton production system. Agronomy Journal 94(5):997−1003 doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.0997 |
[85] |
Kong X, Li X, Lu H, Li Z, Xu S, et al. 2018. Monoseeding improves stand establishment through regulation of apical hook formation and hypocotyl elongation in cotton. Field Crops Research 222:50−58 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.03.014 |
[86] |
Lv Q, Chi B, He N, Zhang D, Dai J, et al. 2023. Cotton-based rotation, intercropping, and alternate intercropping increase yields by improving root–shoot relations. Agronomy 13(2):413 doi: 10.3390/agronomy13020413 |
[87] |
Aydın İ, Arslan S. 2018. Mechanical properties of cotton shoots for topping. Industrial Crops and Products 112:396−401 doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2017.12.036 |
[88] |
Wu Y, Tang J, Tian J, Du M, Gou L, Zhang Y, Zhang W. 2023. Different concentrations of chemical topping agents affect cotton yield and quality by regulating plant architecture. Agronomy 13(7):1741 doi: 10.3390/agronomy13071741 |
[89] |
Dai J, Li W, Zhang D, Tang W, Li Z, et al. 2017. Competitive yield and economic benefits of cotton achieved through a combination of extensive pruning and a reduced nitrogen rate at high plant density. Field Crops Research 209:65−72 doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.010 |
[90] |
Byrd S. 2019. Plant growth regulators in cotton. https://extension.okstate.edu/fact-sheets/plant-growth-regulators-in-cotton.html (Accessed 28 January 2024) |
[91] |
Llandres AL, Almohamad R, Brévault T, Renou A, Téréta I, et al. 2018. Plant training for induced defense against insect pests: a promising tool for integrated pest management in cotton. Pest Management Science 74(9):2004−12 doi: 10.1002/ps.5039 |
[92] |
Xu S, Zuo W, Chen M, Sui L, Dong H, et al. 2017. Effect of drip irrigation amount on the agronomic traits and yield of cotton grown with a chemical topping in northern Xinjiang, China. Cotton Science 29:345−55 |
[93] |
Zhao Q, Zhou C, Zhang J, Li S, Yun Y, et al. 2011. Effect of Chemical Detopping on the Canopy and Yield of Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) in South Xinjiang. Cotton Science 23:329−33 |
[94] |
Mishra PK, Sharma A, Prakash A. 2023. Current research and development in cotton harvesters: A review with application to Indian cotton production systems. Heliyon 9:e16124 doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16124 |
[95] |
Vistro R, Chachar QI, Charchar SD, Charchar NA, Laghari A, et al. 2017. Impact of plant growth regulators on the growth and yield of cotton. International Journal of Agricultural Technology 13(3):353−62 |
[96] |
Abro GH, Syed TS, Unar MA, Zhang MS. 2004. Effect of application of plant growth regulator and micronutrients on insect pest infestation and yield components of cotton. Journal of Entomology 1(1):12−16 doi: 10.3923/je.2004.12.16 |
[97] |
Chen L, Hou J, Hu XL, Zhang JZ, Wang HD. 2022. Environmental Behaviors of Plant Growth Regulators in Soil: A Review. Environmental Science 43(1):11−25 doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202104051 |
[98] |
Paudel KP, Lohr L, Cabrera, M. 2006. Residue management systems and their implications for production efficiency. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 21(2):124−33 doi: 10.1079/raf2005138 |
[99] |
Gencsoylu I. 2009. Effect of plant growth regulators on agronomic characteristics, lint quality, pests, and predators in Cotton. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 28:147−53 doi: 10.1007/s00344-009-9083-x |
[100] |
Tian JS, Zhang XY, Zhang WF, Li JF, Yang YL, et al. 2018. Fiber damage of machine-harvested cotton before ginning and after lint cleaning. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 17:1120−27 doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(17)61730-1 |