| [1] |
des Cognets J, Rafert G. 2019. Assessing the unmet transportation needs of Americans with disabilities. https://anyflip.com/ieove/pvfg/basic |
| [2] |
Harper CD, Hendrickson CT, Mangones S, Samaras C. 2016. Estimating potential increases in travel with autonomous vehicles for the non-driving, elderly and people with travel-restrictive medical conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 72:1−9 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.003 |
| [3] |
Stjernborg V. 2019. Accessibility for all in public transport and the overlooked (social) dimension — a case study of Stockholm. Sustainability 11:4902 doi: 10.3390/su11184902 |
| [4] |
U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). 2018. Fatal Motor Vehicle Crashes 2017: Overview. Dot Hs 812603. pp. 1–9. https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/812603 |
| [5] |
American Association for People with Disability (AAPD). 2016. Equity in Transportation for People with Disabilities. https://www.civilrightsdocs.info/pdf/transportation/final-transportation-equity-disability.pdf |
| [6] |
Tillmann V, Haveman M, Stöppler R, Kvas Š, Monninger D. 2013. Public bus drivers and social inclusion: evaluation of their knowledge and attitudes toward people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities 10:307−13 doi: 10.1111/jppi.12057 |
| [7] |
Park J, Chowdhury S. 2018. Investigating the barriers in a typical journey by public transport users with disabilities. Journal of Transport & Health 10:361−68 doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.008 |
| [8] |
Council N, June D. 2005. The Current State of Transportation for People with Disabilities in the United States National. Report. National Council on Disability, US. www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/GOVPUB-Y3_D63_3-PURL-LPS97333/pdf/GOVPUB-Y3_D63_3-PURL-LPS97333.pdf |
| [9] |
Cohen S, Shirazi S. 2017. Can We Advance Social Equity with Shared, Autonomous and Electrica Vehicles? California Governer's Office of Planning and Research. Report. US: UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies. https://3rev.sf.ucdavis.edu/sites/g/files/dgvnsk6431/files/files/page/3R.Equity.Indesign.Final_.pdf |
| [10] |
Krueger R, Rashidi TH, Rose JM. 2016. Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 69:343−55 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.015 |
| [11] |
Litman T. 2014. Autonomous vehicle implementation predictions: implications for transport planning. Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 42:36−42 |
| [12] |
Brandshaw-Martin H, Easton C. 2014. Autonomous or "driverless" cars and disability: a legal and ethical analysis. Eurpean Journal of Current Legal Issues. 20(3):00 |
| [13] |
Hwang J, Li W, Stough L, Lee C, Turnbull K. 2020. A focus group study on the potential of autonomous vehicles as a viable transportation option: perspectives from people with disabilities and public transit agencies. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 70:260−74 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2020.03.007 |
| [14] |
Kassens-Noor E, Kotval-Karamchandani Z, Cai M. 2020. Willingness to ride and perceptions of autonomous public transit. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 138:92−104 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2020.05.010 |
| [15] |
National Center for Mobility Management. 2018. Autonomous Vehicles: Considerations for People with Disabilities and Older Adults. https://nationalcenterformobilitymanagement.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/AVs_PwD_OA_Final_sm.pdf. |
| [16] |
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (USDOT). 2016. Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks. https://transportation.ky.gov/BikeWalk/Documents/Small%20and%20Rural%20Town%20Multi%20Modal%20Networks%202017.pdf |
| [17] |
Machek E, Burkman E, Crayton T, Cregger J, Diggs D, et al. 2018. Strategic Transit Automation Research Plan. https://doi.org/10.21949/1503427 |
| [18] |
Schoettle B, Sivak M. 2014. A survey of public opinion about connected vehicles in the U.S., the U.K., and Australia. 2014 International Conference on Connected Vehicles and Expo (ICCVE). Vienna, Austria, 3-7 November 2014. USA: IEEE. pp. 687−92. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCVE.2014.7297637 |
| [19] |
Bennett R, Vijaygopal R, Kottasz R. 2019. Attitudes towards autonomous vehicles among people with physical disabilities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 127:1−17 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.07.002 |
| [20] |
Hulse LM, Xie H, Galea ER. 2018. Perceptions of autonomous vehicles: relationships with road users, risk, gender and age. Safety Science 102:1−13 doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2017.10.001 |
| [21] |
Hwang J, Li W, Stough LM, Lee C, Turnbull K. 2021. People with disabilities’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles as a viable transportation option to improve mobility: an exploratory study using mixed methods. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 15:924−42 doi: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1833115 |
| [22] |
Battistini R, Mantecchini L, Postorino MN. 2020. Users' acceptance of connected and automated shuttles for tourism purposes: a survey study. Sustainability 12:10188 doi: 10.3390/su122310188 |
| [23] |
Haboucha CJ, Ishaq R, Shiftan Y. 2017. User preferences regarding autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 78:37−49 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.010 |
| [24] |
Xu X, Fan CK. 2019. Autonomous vehicles, risk perceptions and insurance demand: an individual survey in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 124:549−56 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.009 |
| [25] |
Payre W, Cestac J, Delhomme P. 2014. Intention to use a fully automated car: attitudes and a priori acceptability. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 27:252−63 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2014.04.009 |
| [26] |
Hohenberger C, Spörrle M, Welpe IM. 2016. How and why do men and women differ in their willingness to use automated cars? The influence of emotions across different age groups. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 94:374−85 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.09.022 |
| [27] |
Madigan R, Louw T, Wilbrink M, Schieben A, Merat N. 2017. What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 50:55−64 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007 |
| [28] |
Zhang T, Tao D, Qu X, Zhang X, Lin R, et al. 2019. The roles of initial trust and perceived risk in public’s acceptance of automated vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 98:207−20 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.11.018 |
| [29] |
Xu Z, Zhang K, Min H, Wang Z, Zhao X, et al. 2018. What drives people to accept automated vehicles? Findings from a field experiment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 95:320−34 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.024 |
| [30] |
Fan HSL. 1990. Passenger car equivalents for vehicles on Singapore expressways. Transportation Research Part A: General 24:391−96 doi: 10.1016/0191-2607(90)90051-7 |
| [31] |
McNeish D. 2016. On using Bayesian methods to address small sample problems. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 23:750−73 doi: 10.1080/10705511.2016.1186549 |
| [32] |
Williams R. 2016. Understanding and interpreting generalized ordered logit models. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology 40:7−20 doi: 10.1080/0022250x.2015.1112384 |
| [33] |
Eberly LE, Casella G. 2003. Estimating Bayesian credible intervals. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 112:115−32 doi: 10.1016/s0378-3758(02)00327-0 |
| [34] |
Bürkner PC. 2018. Advanced Bayesian multilevel modeling with the R package brms. The R Journal 10:395 doi: 10.32614/rj-2018-017 |
| [35] |
Kutela B, Kidando E, Kitali AE, Mwende S, Novat N. 2023. Examining in-vehicle distraction sources in relation to crashes using a Bayesian Multinomial Logit model. Advances in Transportation Studies 61:3−18 |
| [36] |
Yoon B, Park Y. 2004. A text-mining-based patent network: analytical tool for high-technology trend. The Journal of High Technology Management Research 15:37−50 doi: 10.1016/j.hitech.2003.09.003 |
| [37] |
Hong HS, Lee SK. 2021. Text network analysis of research topics and trends on global health nursing literature from 1974−2017. Journal of Advanced Nursing 77:1325−34 doi: 10.1111/jan.14685 |
| [38] |
Kutela B, Novat N, Langa N. 2021. Exploring geographical distribution of transportation research themes related to COVID-19 using text network approach. Sustainable Cities and Society 67:102729 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.102729 |
| [39] |
Kutela B, Langa N, Mwende S, Kidando E, Kitali AE, et al. 2021. A text mining approach to elicit public perception of bike-sharing systems. Travel Behaviour and Society 24:113−23 doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.03.002 |
| [40] |
Paranyushkin D. 2012. Visualization of text's polysingularity using network analysis. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:61464677 |
| [41] |
Kim Y, Jang SN. 2018. Mapping the knowledge structure of frailty in journal articles by text network analysis. PLoS One 13:e0196104 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196104 |
| [42] |
Kyriakidis M, Happee R, de Winter JCF. 2015. Public opinion on automated driving: results of an international questionnaire among 5000 respondents. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 32:127−40 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2015.04.014 |
| [43] |
Hussain Q, Alhajyaseen WKM, Adnan M, Almallah M, Almukdad A, et al. 2021. Autonomous vehicles between anticipation and apprehension: investigations through safety and security perceptions. Transport Policy 110:440−51 doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.07.001 |
| [44] |
Rahman MT, Dey K, Das S, Sherfinski M. 2021. Sharing the road with autonomous vehicles: a qualitative analysis of the perceptions of pedestrians and bicyclists. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 78:433−45 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.03.008 |