| [1] |
Mebarki A, Boukri M, Laribi A, Farsi M, Belazougui M, et al. 2014. Seismic vulnerability: theory and application to Algerian buildings. Journal of Seismology 18(2):331−43 doi: 10.1007/s10950-013-9377-0 |
| [2] |
Applied Technology Council (ATC). 2002. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards: a handbook, (FEMA-154). California: Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 134 pp. www.fema.gov/sites/default/files/2020-07/fema_earthquakes_rapid-visual-screening-of-buildings-for-potential-seismic-hazards-a-handbook-third-edition-fema-p-154.pdf |
| [3] |
Applied Technology Council. 2003. ATC-38 Post earthquake building assessment forms. California. USA: Applied Technology Council (ATC). 100 pp. |
| [4] |
Applied Technology Council. 2003. ATC-20i. User's manual, mobile post earthquake evaluation data acquisition system. Version 1.0. California, USA: Applied Technology Council (ATC). 70 pp. |
| [5] |
Applied Technology Council. 2005. ATC-20 Procedures for post earthquake safety evaluation of buildings. California, USA: Applied Technology Council (ATC). 125 pp. |
| [6] |
Applied Technology Council. 2004. Rapid visual screening of buildings for potential seismic hazards training manual. California, USA: Applied Technology Council (ATC). 100 pp. |
| [7] |
Takashi K, Fumitoshi K, Yoshiaki N. 2002. Quick inspection manual for damaged reinforced concrete buildings due to earthquakes. Based on the disaster of 1999 Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey. Report MLIT, Japan. www.mlit.go.jp/sogoseisaku/inter/keizai/gijyutu/pdf/risk_judge_j_08_1.pdf |
| [8] |
Masi A, Santarsiero G, Digrisolo A, Chiauzzi L, Manfredi V. 2016. Procedures and experiences in the post-earthquake usability evaluation of ordinary buildings. Bollettino Di Geofisica Teorica Ed Applicata 57(2):199−220 |
| [9] |
Anagnostopoulos S, Moretti M. 2008. Post-earthquake emergency assessment of building damage, safety and usability: Part 1: Technical issues. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28(3):223−32 doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.05.007 |
| [10] |
Anagnostopoulos S, Moretti M. 2008. Post-earthquake emergency assessment of building damage, safety and usability: Part 2: Organisation. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28(3):233−44 doi: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2006.05.008 |
| [11] |
O'Rourke TD, Eguchi RT, Jeon SS, Huyck CK. 2001. Advanced GIS for loss estimation and rapid post-earthquake assessment of building damage. New York, USA: Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research. 125 pp |
| [12] |
Sextos AG, Kappos AJ, Stylianidis KC. 2006. Development of a gis-oriented database for the pre-and post-earthquake assessment of buildings. 8 th US National Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 18−22 Apr. 2006, San Francisco, CA, United States. pp. 6270−79. |
| [13] |
Haselton CB, Deierlein, GG. 2007. Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment-Frame Buildings. Berkeley. CA: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER). 120 pp |
| [14] |
Kappos AJ, Stylianidis KC, Pitilakis K. 1998. Development of seismic risk scenarios based on a hybrid method of vulnerability assessment. Natural Hazards 17(2):177−92 doi: 10.1023/A:1008083021022 |
| [15] |
Mazumder RK, Salman AM. 2019. Seismic damage assessment using RADIUS and GIS: A case study of Sylhet City, Bangladesh. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 34:243−54 doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.11.023 |
| [16] |
Mergos PE, Kappos AJ. 2010. Seismic damage analysis including inelastic shear–flexure interaction. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8(1):27−46 doi: 10.1007/s10518-009-9161-2 |
| [17] |
Morfidis K, Kostinakis K. 2018. Approaches to the rapid seismic damage prediction of r/c buildings using artificial neural networks. Engineering Structures 165:120−41 doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.028 |
| [18] |
Paal SG, Jeon JS, Brilakis I, DesRoches R. 2015. Automated damage index estimation of reinforced concrete columns for post-earthquake evaluations. Journal of Structural Engineering 141(9):04014228 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001200 |
| [19] |
Mitrani-Resier J, Wu S, Beck JL. 2016. Virtual Inspector and its application to immediate pre-event and post-event earthquake loss and safety assessment of buildings. Natural Hazards 81(3):1861−78 doi: 10.1007/s11069-016-2159-6 |
| [20] |
Von Meding J, Wong J, Kanjanabootra S, Taheri Tafti M. 2016. Competence-based system development for post-disaster project management. Disaster Prevention and Management 25(3):375−94 doi: 10.1108/DPM-07-2015-0164 |
| [21] |
Leidig M, Teeuw R. 2015. Free software: A review, in the context of disaster management. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 42:49−56 doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2015.05.012 |
| [22] |
Cheng T, Haworth J, Manley E. 2012. Advances in geocomputation (1996–2011). Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 36(6):481−7 doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2012.10.002 |
| [23] |
Levine NM, Jr Spencer BF Jr. 2022. Post-earthquake building evaluation using UAVs: A BIM-based digital twin framework. Sensors 22(3):873 doi: 10.3390/s22030873 |
| [24] |
Zhu Z, Brilakis I. 2010. Concrete column recognition in images and videos. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 24(6):478−87 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000053 |
| [25] |
German S, Jeon JS, Zhu Z, Bearman C, Brilakis I, et al. 2013. Machine vision-enhanced postearthquake inspection. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering 27(6):622−34 doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000333 |
| [26] |
Smail T, Abed M, Mebarki A, Lazecky M. 2022. Earthquake-induced landslide monitoring and survey by means of InSAR. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 22(5):1609−25 doi: 10.5194/nhess-22-1609-2022 |
| [27] |
Mebarki A, Valencia N, Salagnac JL, Barroca B. 2012. Flood hazards and masonry constructions: A probabilistic framework for damage, risk and resilience at urban scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 12(5):1799−809 doi: 10.5194/nhess-12-1799-2012 |
| [28] |
Mebarki A, Jerez S, Prodhomme G, Reimeringer M. 2016. Natural hazards, vulnerability and structural resilience: Tsunamis and industrial tanks. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 7:5−17 doi: 10.1080/19475705.2016.1181458 |
| [29] |
Mebarki A. 2017. Resilience: Theory and metrics–A metal structure as demonstrator. Engineering Structures 138:425−33 doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.026 |
| [30] |
Boukri M, Farsi MN, Mebarki A, Belazougui M. 2013. Development of an integrated approach for Algerian building seismic damage assessment. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 47(4):471−93 doi: 10.12989/sem.2013.47.4.000 |
| [31] |
Boukri M, Farsi MN, Mebarki A, Belazougui M, Amellal O, et al. 2014. Seismic risk and damage prediction: Case of the buildings in Constantine city (Algeria). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12(6):2683−704 doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9594-0 |
| [32] |
Boukri M, Farsi MN, Mebarki A, Belazougui M, Ait-Belkacem M, et al. 2018. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale: Case of Algerian buildings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 31:555−75 doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.014 |
| [33] |
Mebarki A, Génatios C, Lafuente M. 2008. Natural and Technological Risks: Hazards, Vulnerability and Reliability of Constructions - towards an integrated probabilistic formulation. France: Presses Ponts et Chaussées |
| [34] |
Mebarki A, Laribi A. 2008. Evaluation post-sismique des dommages structuraux: méthodologie probabiliste. Risques Naturels et technologiques, eds. Mebarki A, Genatios C, Lafuente M. Paris, France: Presses de l'Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées. pp. 155−72 |
| [35] |
Noura H, Mebarki A, Abed M. 2017. Post-quake structural damage evaluation by neural networks: theory and calibration. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 27:710−27 doi: 10.1080/19648189.2017.1304277 |
| [36] |
Allali SA, Abed M, Mebarki A. 2018. Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic. Engineering Structures 166:117−27 doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.03.055 |
| [37] |
Mebarki A. 2006. Post-seismic structural damage evaluation: an integrated probabilistic proposal. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Engineering Computational Technology (ECT2006), Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 2006. Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain: University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria |
| [38] |
Boukri M, Farsi MN, Mebarki A. 2023. Rapid earthquake loss estimation model for Algerian urban heritage: Case of Blida city. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 17(4):635−60 doi: 10.1080/15583058.2021.1958394 |
| [39] |
Benfedda A, Abbes K, Ayadi A, Maouche S, Bouhadad Y, et al. 2023. Source rupture process of the March 18th, 2021, Mw6.0 Béjaia (Algeria) earthquake associated with the Western segment – A link with the August 1856 Djidjelli earthquakes (Io=VIII-IX, M≥6). Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 345:107115 doi: 10.1016/j.pepi.2023.107115 |
| [40] |
Amar B, Ahmed S, Youcef B, Abdennasser S, Mustafa A, et al. 2021. The main events of the July–August 2020 Mila (NE Algeria) seismic sequence and the triggered landslides. Arabian Journal of Geosciences 14(18):1894 doi: 10.1007/s12517-021-08301-x |
| [41] |
Benbokhari A, Benazouz C, Mebarki A. 2023. Seismic response prediction using a hybrid unsupervised and supervised machine learning in case of 3D RC frame buildings. Research in Engineering, Structures, and Materials 10(4):1373−97 doi: 10.17515/resm2024.137me1229rs |
| [42] |
Benbokhari A, Chikh B, Mebarki A. 2023. Dynamic response estimation of an equivalent single degree of freedom system using artificial neural network and nonlinear static procedure. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials 10(2):431−44 doi: 10.17515/resm2023.40me0818rs |
| [43] |
Mebarki A, Jerez S, Boukri M, Chikh B, Benbokhari A. 2024. Emergency management and urban resilience under seismic risks. Part I: Theoretical approach for quick post-quake damage evaluation of buildings. Emergency Management Science and Technology 4:e027 doi: 10.48130/emst-0024-0027 |
| [44] |
Mebarki A, Jerez S. 2024. Emergency management and urban resilience under seismic risks. Part II: validation and sensitivity analysis for buildings seismic damage evaluation. Emergency Management Science and Technology 4:e026 doi: 10.48130/emst-0024-0025 |