[1]

Ferreira THS, Tsunada MS, Bassi D, Araújo P, Mattiello L, et al. 2017. Sugarcane water stress tolerance mechanisms and its implications on developing biotechnology solutions. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1077

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01077
[2]

Chohan M. 2019. Impact of climate change on sugarcane crop and remedial measures—a review. Pakistan Sugar Journal 34:15−22

doi: 10.35380/sugar.034.01.0141
[3]

Manimekalai R, Suresh G, Singaravelu B. 2022. Sugarcane transcriptomics in response to abiotic and biotic stresses: a review. Sugar Tech 24:1295−1318

doi: 10.1007/s12355-021-01098-9
[4]

Qin N, Lu Q, Fu G, Wang J, Fei K, et al. 2023. Assessing the drought impact on sugarcane yield based on crop water requirements and standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. Agricultural Water Management 275:108037

doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2022.108037
[5]

Delfin EF, Olalia LC, Mandac RL, Reyes JA, Casas DE, et al. 2023. Assessment of sugarcane productivity under drought conditions. ISSAAS International Scientific Congress and General Meeting 2023, Alabang, Muntinlupa City, Philippines, 8−10 Nov 2023. ISSAAS Philippine Chapter. pp. 191. https://agris.fao.org/search/en/providers/122430/records/6762c6d1b25aa85184926b68
[6]

Teinseree N, Maitreemitr P, Volkaert HA, Chutteang C, Sookgul P, et al. 2024. Flooding tolerance of sugarcane genotypes under recurring floods in plant and ratoon crops. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology 24(2):e46712422

doi: 10.1590/1984-70332024v24n2a15
[7]

Glaz B, Gilbert R. 2010. Sugarcane flood tolerance: current limits and future prospects. Report Number DOE-HENDRYFLA-00303-417. www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1338819
[8]

Salter B, Kok E. 2016. Development of a method to impose waterlogging on sugarcane grown in pots. Proceedings of the 38th Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Mackay, Queensland, Australia. pp. Ag08. www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/20173009410
[9]

Gomathi R, Gururaja Rao PN, Chandran K, Selvi A. 2015. Adaptive responses of sugarcane to waterlogging stress: an over view. Sugar Tech 17:325−338

doi: 10.1007/s12355-014-0319-0
[10]

Gilbert RA, Rainbolt CR, Morris DR, Bennett AC. 2007. Morphological responses of sugarcane to long term flooding. Agronomy Journal 99:1622−1628

doi: 10.2134/agronj2007.0085
[11]

Worasant U. 2010. Effect of waterlogged conditions and growth, yield and quality of sugarcane. Thesis. Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[12]

Misra V, Solomon S, Singh P, Prajapati CP, Ansari MI. 2016. Effect of water logging on post-harvest sugarcane deterioration. Agrica 5(2):119−132
[13]

Misra V, Solomon S, Mall AK, Prajapati CP, Hashem A, et al. 2020. Morphological assessment of water stressed sugarcane: A comparison of waterlogged and drought affected crop. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences 27(5):1228−1236

doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.02.007
[14]

Joseph R, Reed S, Silva TA, Glaz B. 2011. The effects of natural and induced short term floods on four sugarcane accessions. International Sugar Journal 113:64−70
[15]

Alhaithloul HAS, Abu-Elsaoud AM, Soliman MH. 2020. Abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants: role of phytohormones. In Abiotic stress in plants, eds. Fahad S, Saud S, Chen Y, Wu C, Wang D. InTech Open. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.93710
[16]

Voß U, Bishopp A, Farcot E, Bennett MJ. 2014. Modelling hormonal response and development. Trends in Plant Science 19:311−319

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.004
[17]

Kazan K. 2015. Diverse roles of jasmonates and ethylene in abiotic stress tolerance. Trends in Plant Science 20(4):219−229

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2015.02.001
[18]

Cutler SR, Rodriguez PL, Finkelstein RR, Abrams SR. 2010. Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signalling network. Annual Review of Plant Biology 61:651−679

doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042809-112122
[19]

Eyidogan F, Oz MT, Yucel M, Oktem HA. 2012. Signal transduction of phytohormones under abiotic stresses. In Phytohormones and abiotic stress tolerance in plants, eds. Khan N, Nazar R, Iqbal N, Anjum N. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp 1−48 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-25829-9_1
[20]

Rodrigues FA, de Laia ML, Zingaretti SM. 2009. Analysis of gene expression profiles under water stress in tolerant and sensitive sugarcane plants. Plant Science 176(2):286−302

doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.11.007
[21]

Ullah A, Manghwar H, Shaban M, Khan AH, Akbar A, et al. 2018. Phytohormones enhanced drought tolerance in plants: a coping strategy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 25:33103−33118

doi: 10.1007/s11356-018-3364-5
[22]

Li CN, Yang LT, Srivastava MK, Li YR. 2014. Foliar application of abscisic acid improves drought tolerance of sugarcane plant under severe water stress. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research 3(1):101−107

doi: 10.5555/20143294165
[23]

Li C, Nong Q, Solanki MK, Liang Q, Xie J, et al. 2016. Differential expression profiles and pathways of genes in sugarcane leaf at elongation stage in response to drought stress. Scientific Reports 6:25698

doi: 10.1038/srep25698
[24]

Wilkinson S, Davies WJ. 2002. ABA-based chemical signalling: the co- ordination of responses to stress in plants. Plant, Cell & Environment 25:195−210

doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00824.x
[25]

Neill S, Barros R, Bright J, Desikan R, Hancock J, et al. 2008. Nitric oxide, stomatal closure, and abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 59:165−176

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm293
[26]

An Y, Liu L, Chen L, Wang L. 2016. ALA Inhibits ABA-induced stomatal closure via reducing H2O2 and Ca2+ levels in guard cells. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:482

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00482
[27]

Li CN, Srivastava MK, Nong Q, Yang LT, Li YR. 2013. Molecular cloning and characterization of SoNCED, a novel gene encoding 9-cis-epoxycarotenoid dioxygenase from sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Genes & Genomics 35:101−109

doi: 10.1007/s13258-013-0065-9
[28]

Sugiharto B, Sakakibara H, Sumadi, Sugiyama T. 1997. Differential expression of two genes for sucrose-phosphate synthase in sugarcane: molecular cloning of the cDNAs and comparative analysis of gene expression. Plant and Cell Physiology 38:961−965

doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029258
[29]

Iqbal N, Umar S, Khan NA, Khan MIR. 2014. A new perspective of phytohormones in salinity tolerance: Regulation of proline metabolism. Environmental and Experimental Botany 100:34−42

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.12.006
[30]

Miura K, Tada Y. 2014. Regulation of water, salinity, and cold stress responses by salicylic acid. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:4

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00004
[31]

Bartoli CG, Casalongué CA, Simontacchi M, Marquez-Garcia B, Foyer CH. 2013. Interactions between hormone and redox signalling pathways in the control of growth and cross tolerance to stress. Environmental and Experimental Botany 94:73−88

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2012.05.003
[32]

Miransari M, Smith DL. 2014. Plant hormones and seed germination. Environmental Experimental Botany 99:110−121

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.11.005
[33]

Wang J, Song L, Gong X, Xu J, Li M. 2020. Functions of jasmonic acid in plant regulation and response to abiotic stress. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21:1446

doi: 10.3390/ijms21041446
[34]

Benschop JJ, Bou J, Peeters AJM, Wagemaker N, Gühl K, et al. 2006. Long-term submergence-induced elongation in Rumex palustris requires abscisic acid-dependent biosynthesis of gibberellin. Plant Physiology 141:1644−1652

doi: 10.1104/pp.106.082636
[35]

Wu H, Chen H, Zhang Y, Zhang Y, Zhu D, et al. 2019. Effects of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate and paclobutrazol on the endogenous hormones of two contrasting rice varieties under submergence stress. Plant Growth Regulation 87:109−121

doi: 10.1007/s10725-018-0457-6
[36]

Yamauchi T, Tanaka A, Tsutsumi N, Inukai Y, Nakazono M. 2020. A role for auxin in ethylene-dependent inducible aerenchyma formation in rice roots. Plants 9:610

doi: 10.3390/plants9050610
[37]

Zhu JK. 2016. Abiotic stress signaling and responses in plants. Cell 167:313−324

doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
[38]

He F, Wang HL, Li HG, Su Y, Li S, et al. 2018. PeCHYR1, a ubiquitin E3 ligase from Populus euphratica, enhances drought tolerance via ABA−induced stomatal closure by ROS production in Populus. Plant Biotechnology Journal 16:1514−1528

doi: 10.1111/pbi.12893
[39]

Kazan K, Manners JM. 2009. Linking development to defense: auxin in plant–pathogen interactions. Trends in Plant Science 14:373−382

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.04.005
[40]

Lv B, Yan Z, Tian H, Zhang X, Ding Z. 2019. Local auxin biosynthesis mediates plant growth and development. Trends in Plant Science 24:6−9

doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2018.10.014
[41]

Nelissen H, Rymen B, Jikumaru Y, Demuynck K, Van Lijsebettens M, et al. 2012. A local maximum in gibberellin levels regulates maize leaf growth by spatial control of cell division. Current Biology 22:1183−1187

doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2012.04.065
[42]

Zhou ZS, Guo K, Elbaz AA, Yang ZM. 2009. Salicylic acid alleviates mercury toxicity by preventing oxidative stress in roots of Medicago sativa. Environmental and Experimental Botany 65:27−34

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2008.06.001
[43]

Hayat Q, Hayat S, Irfan M, Ahmad A. 2010. Effect of exogenous salicylic acid under changing environment: a review. Environmental and Experimental Botany 68:14−25

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.08.005
[44]

Arif Y, Sami F, Siddiqui H, Bajguz A, Hayat S. 2020. Salicylic acid in relation to other phytohormones in plant: a study towards physiology and signal transduction under challenging environment. Environmental and Experimental Botany 175:104040

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2020.10404
[45]

Per TS, Khan MIR, Anjum NA, Masood A, Hussain SJ, et al. 2018. Jasmonates in plants under abiotic stresses: crosstalk with other phytohormones matters. Environmental and Experimental Botany 145:104−120

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.11.004
[46]

Farhangi-Abriz S, Ghassemi-Golezani K. 2019. Jasmonates: mechanisms and functions in abiotic stress tolerance of plants. Biocatalysis and Agricultural Biotechnology 20:101210

doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101210
[47]

Raza A, Charagh S, Zahid Z, Mubarik MS, Javed R, et al. 2021. Jasmonic acid: a key frontier in conferring abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Plant Cell Reports 40(8):1513−1541

doi: 10.1007/s00299-020-02614-z
[48]

Hudgins JW, Franceschi VR. 2004. Methyl jasmonate-induced ethylene production is responsible for conifer phloem defense responses and reprogramming of stem cambial zone for traumatic resin duct formation. Plant Physiology 135:2134−2149

doi: 10.1104/pp.103.037929
[49]

Li SW. 2021. Molecular bases for the regulation of adventitious root generation in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:614072

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.614072
[50]

Yamauchi T, Shimamura S, Nakazono M, Mochizuki T. 2013. Aerenchyma formation in crop species: a review. Field Crops Research 152:8−16

doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.008
[51]

Colmer TD. 2003. Long distance transport of gases in plants: a perspective on internal aeration and radial oxygen loss from roots. Plant & Cell Environment 26:17−36

doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.00846.x
[52]

Hossain A, Uddin S. 2011. Mechanisms of waterlogging tolerance in wheat: morphological and metabolic adaptations under hypoxia or anoxia. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5:1094−1101
[53]

Tavares EQP, Grandis A, Lembke CG, Souza GM, Purgatto E, et al. 2018. Roles of auxin and ethylene in aerenchyma formation in sugarcane roots. Plant Signaling & Behavior 13(3):e1422464

doi: 10.1080/15592324.2017.1422464
[54]

Tetsushi H, Karim MA. 2007. Flooding tolerance of sugarcane in relation to growth, physiology and root structure. South Pacific Studies 28:9−22
[55]

Leite DCC, Grandis A, Tavares EQP, Piovezani AR, Pattathil S et al. 2017. Cell wall changes during the formation of aerenchyma in sugarcane roots. Annals of Botany 120:693−708

doi: 10.1093/aob/mcx050
[56]

Fagerstedt KV. 2010. Programmed cell death and aerenchyma formation under hypoxia. In Waterlogging signalling and tolerance in plants, eds. Mancuso S, Shabala S. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 99–118. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-10305-6_6
[57]

Grandis A, De Souza AP, Tavares EQP, Buckeridge MS. 2014. Using natural plant cell wall degradation mechanisms to improve second generation bioethanol. In Plants and bioenergy, eds. McCann MC, Buckeridge MS, Carpita NC. New York, NY: Springer. pp. 211–230 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9329-7_13
[58]

Tavares EQP, De Souza AP, Romim GH, Grandis A, Plasencia A, et al. 2019. The control of endopolygalacturonase expression by the sugarcane RAV transcription factor during aerenchyma formation. Journal of Experimental Botany 70(2):497−506

doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery362
[59]

Grandis A, Leite DCC, Tavares EQP, Arenque-Musa BC, Gaiarsa JW, et al. 2019. Cell wall hydrolases act in concert during aerenchyma development in sugarcane roots. Annals of Botany 124:1067−1089

doi: 10.1093/aob/mcz099
[60]

Bouranis DL, Chorlanopoulou SN, Siyiannis VF, Protonotarios VE, Hawkesford MJ. 2007. Lysigenous aerenchyma development in roots-Triggers and cross talk for a cell elimination program. International Journal of Plant Development Biology 3(3):127−140
[61]

Evans DE. 2004. Aerenchyma formation. New Phytologist 161:35−49

doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00907.x
[62]

Armstrong J, Armstrong W. 1994. Chlorophyll development in mature lysigenous and schizogenous root aerenchymas provides evidence of continuing cortical cell viability. New Phytologist 126:493−497

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1994.tb04246.x
[63]

Gunawardena AHLAN, Pearce DME, Jackson MB, Hawes CR, Evans DE. 2001. Characterisation of programmed cell death during aerenchyma formation induced by ethylene or hypoxia in roots of maize (Zea mays L.). Planta 212(2):205−214

doi: 10.1007/s004250000381
[64]

Gunawardena AHLAN, Pearce DME, Jackson MB, Hawes CR, Evans DE. 2001. Rapid changes in cell wall pectic polysaccharides are closely associated with early stages of aerenchyma formation, a spatially localized form of programmed cell death in roots of maize (Zea mays L.) promoted by ethylene. Plant, Cell and Environment 24:1369−1375

doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.2001.00774.x
[65]

Rajhi I, Yamauchi T, Takahashi H, Nishiuchi S, Shiono K, et al. 2011. Identification of genes expressed in maize root cortical cells during lysigenous aerenchyma formation using laser microdissection and microarray analyses. New Phytologist 190:351−368

doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03535.x
[66]

Tavares EQP, De Souza AP, Buckeridge MS. 2015. How endogenous plant cell-wall degradation mechanisms can help achieve higher efficiency in saccharification of biomass. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:4133−4143

doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv171
[67]

Nishiuchi S, Yamauchi T, Takahashi H, Kotula L, Nakazono M. 2012. Mechanisms for coping with submergence and waterlogging in rice. Rice 5:2−14

doi: 10.1186/1939-8433-5-2
[68]

Takahashi H, Yamauchi T, Colomer TD, Nakazono M. 2014. Aerenchyma formation in plants. In Low oxygen stress in plants, eds. Van Dongen JT, Licausi F. Vol 21. Vienna: Springer. pp. 247-265 doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1254-0_13
[69]

Yukiyoshi K, Karahara I. 2014. Role of ethylene signalling in the formation of constitutive aerenchyma in primary roots of rice. AoB Plants 6:plu043

doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plu043
[70]

Kawase M. 1979. Role of cellulase in aerenchyma development in sunflower. American Journal of Botany 66:183−190

doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1979.tb06213.x
[71]

Yang SF and Hoffman NE. 1984. Ethylene biosynthesis and its regulation in higher plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 35:155−189

doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.35.060184.001103
[72]

Pearce DME, Hall KC, Jackson MB. 1992. The effects of oxygen, carbon dioxide and ethylene on ethylene biosynthesis in relation to shoot extension in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa) and barnyard grass (Echinochloa oryzoides). Annals of Botany 69:441−447

doi: 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.AOB.A088366
[73]

Visser EJW, Voesenek LACJ. 2005. Acclimation to soil flooding – sensing and signal-transduction. Plant and Soil 254:197−214

doi: 10.1007/s11104-004-1650-0
[74]

Van Der Straeten D, Zhou Z, Prinsen E, Van Onckelen HA, Van Montagu MC. 2001. A comparative molecular-physiological study of submergence response in lowland and deepwater rice. Plant Physiology 125:955−68

doi: 10.1104/pp.125.2.955
[75]

Sasidharan R, Voesenek LACJ. 2015. Ethylene-mediated acclimations to flooding stress. Plant Physiology 169(1):3−12

doi: 10.1104/pp.15.00387
[76]

He C, Finlayson SA, Drew MC, Jordan WR, Morgan PW. 1996. Ethylene biosynthesis during aerenchyma formation in roots of maize subjected to mechanical impedance and hypoxia. Plant Physiology 112(4):1679−1685

doi: 10.1104/pp.112.4.1679
[77]

Armstrong W, Cousins D, Armstrong J, Turner DW, Beckett PM. 2000. Oxygen distribution in wetland plant roots and permeability barriers to gas exchange with the rhizosphere: a microelectrode and modelling study with Phragmites australis. Annals of Botany 86:687−703

doi: 10.1006/anbo.2000.1236
[78]

Voesenek LACJ, Blom CWPM. 1989. Growth responses of Rumex species in relation to submergence and ethylene. Plant, Cell and Environment 12(4):433−439

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3040.1989.tb01959.x
[79]

Steffens B, Rasmussen A. 2016. The physiology of adventitious roots. Plant Physiology 170(2):603−617

doi: 10.1104/pp.15.01360
[80]

Verstraeten I, Beeckman T, Geelen D. 2013. Adventitious root induction in Arabidopsis thaliana as a model for in vitro root organogenesis. In Plant Organogenesis: Methods and Protocols, ed. De Smet I. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press. pp. 159–175 10.1007/978-1-62703-221-6_10
[81]

Agulló-Antón MÁ, Ferrández-Ayela A, Fernández-García N, Nicolás C, Albacete A, et al. 2014. Early steps of adventitious rooting: morphology, hormonal profiling and carbohydrate turnover in carnation stem cuttings. Physiologia Plantarum 150:446−462

doi: 10.1111/ppl.12114
[82]

Rasmussen A, Hu Y, Depaepe T, Vandenbussche F, Boyer FD, et al. 2017. Ethylene controls adventitious root initiation sites in Arabidopsis hypocotyls independently of strigolactones. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 36:897−911

doi: 10.1007/s00344-017-9692-8
[83]

Jackson MB. 2008. Ethylene-promoted elongation: An adaptation to submergence stress. Annals of Botany 101(2):229−248

doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm237
[84]

Qi X, Li Q, Ma X, Qian C, Wang H et al. 2019. Waterlogging-induced adventitious root formation in cucumber is regulated by ethylene and auxin through reactive oxygen species signalling. Plant, Cell & Environment 42(5):1458−1470

doi: 10.1111/pce.13504
[85]

Li A, Lakshmanan P, He W, Tan H, Liu L, et al. 2020. Transcriptome profiling provided molecular insights into auxin-induced adventitious root formation in sugarcane (Saccharum spp. interspecific hybrids) microshoot. Plants 9(8):931

doi: 10.3390/plants9080931
[86]

Visser EJW, Bögemann GM, Blom CWPM, Voesenek LACJ. 1996. Ethylene accumulation in waterlogged Rumex plants promotes formation of adventitious roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 47:403−410

doi: 10.1093/jxb/47.3.403
[87]

Vidoz ML, Loreti E, Mensuali A, Alpi A, Perata P. 2010. Hormonal interplay during adventitious root formation in flooded tomato plants. The Plant Journal 63:551−562

doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04262.x
[88]

Chakraborty R, Rehman RU, Siddiqui MW, Liu H, Seth CS. 2025. Phytohormones: heart of plant signaling network under biotic, abiotic, and climate change stresses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 223:109389

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109839
[89]

Pola-Sánchez E, Muñoz-Javier R, Guzmán-López JA, Abraham-Juárez MJ. 2025. Foliar spray treatment for exogenous application of hormones in maize. Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2025:prot108621

doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot108621
[90]

Khan MIR, Kumari S, Nazir F, Khanna RR, Gupta R, et al. 2023. Defensive role of plant hormones in advancing abiotic stress resistant rice plants. Rice Science 30(1):15−35

doi: 10.1016/j.rsci.2022.08.002
[91]

Swain R, Sahoo S, Behera M, Rout GR. 2023. Instigating prevalent abiotic stress resilience in crop by exogenous application of phytohormones and nutrient. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1104874

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1104874
[92]

Shaffique S, Hussain S, Kang SM, Imran M, Injamum-Ul-Hoque M, et al. 2023. Phytohormonal modulation of the drought stress in soybean: outlook, research progress, and cross talk. Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1237295

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1237295
[93]

Nong Q, Malviya MK, Lin, L, Xie, J, Mo Z, et al. 2024. Enhancing sugarcane seedling resilience to water stress through exogenous abscisic acid: a study on antioxidant enzymes and phytohormone dynamics. ACS Omega 9(29):31684−31693

doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c02341
[94]

Huang S, Jin S. 2025. Enhancing drought tolerance in horticultural plants through plant hormones: a strategic coping mechanism. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1502438

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1502438
[95]

Khalvandi M, Siosemardeh A, Roohi E, Keramati S. 2021. Salicylic acid alleviated the effect of drought stress on photosynthetic characteristics and leaf protein pattern in winter wheat. Heliyon 7(1):e05908

doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e05908
[96]

Safari M, Majidi MM. 2025. Role of genetic diversity and salicylic acid in drought stress memory of tall fescue. Scientific Reports 15:7932

doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-92155-w
[97]

Vaishnav D, Chowdhury P. 2023. Types and function of phytohormone and their role in stress. In Plant abiotic stress responses and tolerance mechanisms, eds. Hussain S, Awan TH, Waraich EA, Awan MI. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.109325
[98]

Rhaman MS, Imran S, Rauf F, Khatun M, Baskin CC, et al. 2021. Seed priming with phytohormones: an effective approach for the mitigation of abiotic stress. Plants 10(1):37

doi: 10.3390/plants10010037
[99]

Bamrungrai J, Tubana B, Tre-loges V, Promkhambut A, Polthanee A. 2021. Effects of water stress and auxin application on growth and yield of two sugarcane cultivars under greenhouse conditions. Agriculture 11:613

doi: 10.3390/agriculture11070613
[100]

Zhang J, Jia W, Yang J, Ismail AM. 2006. Role of ABA in integrating plant responses to drought and salt stresses. Field Crops Research 97:111−119

doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2005.08.018
[101]

Liu J, Jiang MY, Zhou YF, Liu YL. 2005. Production of polyamines is enhanced by endogenous abscisic acid in maize seedlings subjected to salt stress. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 47(11):1326−1334

doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2005.00183.x
[102]

Zhang J, Jia W, Zhang DP. 1997. Re-export and metabolism of xylem-delivered ABA in attached maize leaves under different transpirational fluxes and xylem ABA concentrations. Journal of Experimental Botany 48:1557−1564

doi: 10.1093/jxb/48.8.1557
[103]

Khadri M, Tejera NA, Lluch C. 2007. Sodium chloride–ABA interaction in two common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars differing in salinity tolerance. Environmental and Experimental Botany 60:211−218

doi: 10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.10.008
[104]

Zhao FY, Liu W, Zhang SY. 2009. Different responses of plant growth and antioxidant system to the combination of cadmium and heat stress in transgenic and non-transgenic rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 51(10):942−950

doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2009.00865.x
[105]

Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Gill SS, Fujita M. 2013. Drought stress responses in plants, oxidative stress and antioxidant defense. In Climate change and plant abiotic stress tolerance, eds. Tuteja N, Gill SS. John Wiley & Sons. doi: 10.1002/9783527675265.ch09
[106]

Ali S, Ahmad Mir R, Haque MA, Danishuddin, Almalki MA, et al. 2025. Exploring physiological and molecular dynamics of drought stress responses in plants: challenges and future directions. Frontier in Plant Science 16:1565635

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1565635
[107]

Qureshi MK, Gawroński P, Munir S, Jindal S, Kerchev P. 2022. Hydrogen peroxide induced stress acclimation in plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 79:129

doi: 10.1007/s00018-022-04156-x
[108]

Meyer AJ. 2008. The integration of glutathione homeostasis and redox signaling. Journal of Plant Physiology 165(13):1390−1403

doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2007.10.015
[109]

Vargas L, Santa Brígida AB, Mota Filho JP, de Carvalho TG, Rojas CA, et al. 2014. Drought tolerance conferred to sugarcane by association with Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus: A transcriptomic view of hormone pathways. PLoS ONE 9:e114744

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114744
[110]

Grantz DA, Meinzer FC. 1990. Effect of soil water deficit on stomatal behaviour in sugarcane. British Society for Plant Growth Regulation 21:286−287
[111]

Smith JP, Lawn RJ, Nable RO. 1999. Investigations into the root : shoot relationship of sugarcane and some implications for crop productivity in the presence of sub-optimal conditions. Proceedings of Australian Sugar Cane Technology 21:108−113
[112]

Rai RK, Tripathi N, Gautam D, Singh P. 2017. Exogenous application of ethrel and gibberellic acid stimulates physiological growth of late planted sugarcane with short growth period in sub -tropical India. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 36:472−486

doi: 10.1007/s00344-016-9655-5
[113]

Verma I, Roopendra K, Sharma A, Jain R, Singh RK, et al. 2017. Expression analysis of genes associated with sucrose accumulation in sugarcane under normal and GA3 induced source -sink perturbed conditions. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 39:133

doi: 10.1007/s11738-017-2433-6
[114]

Guiderdoni E, Mérot B, Eksomtramage T, Paulet F, Feldmann P, et al. 1995. Somatic embryogenesis in sugarcane (Saccharum species). In Somatic Embryogenesis and Synthetic Seed II. Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, ed Bajaj YPS. Vol 31. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp. 92−113 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-78643-3_9
[115]

Di Pauli V, Fontana PD, Lewi DM, Felipe A, Erazzú LE. 2021. Optimized somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in elite Argentinian sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) cultivars. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 19:171

doi: 10.1186/s43141-021-00270-8
[116]

Botha FC, Lakshmanan P, O'Coneell A, Moore PH. 2013. Hormones and growth regulators. In Sugarcane: Physiology, Biochemistry and Functional Biology, eds. Moore PH, Botha FC. John Wiley & Sons. pp. 331−377 doi: 10.1002/9781118771280.ch14
[117]

Lv J, Christie P, Zhang S. 2019. Uptake, translocation, and transformation of metal-based nanoparticles in plants: Recent advances and methodological challenges. Environmental Science: Nano 6:41−59

doi: 10.1039/C8EN00645H
[118]

Raliya R, Franke C, Chavalmane S, Nair R, Reed N, et al. 2016. Quantitative understanding of nanoparticle uptake in watermelon plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1288

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01288
[119]

Shahid M, Dumat C, Khalid S, Schreck E, Xiong T, et al. 2017. Foliar heavy metal uptake, toxicity and detoxification in plants: a comparison of foliar and root metal uptake. Journal of Hazardous Materials 325:36−58

doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.11.063
[120]

Su Y, Ashworth V, Kim C, Adeleye AS, Rolshausen P, et al. 2019. Delivery, uptake, fate, and transport of engineered nanoparticles in plants: a critical review and data analysis. Environmental Science: Nano 6:2311−2331

doi: 10.1039/C9EN00461K
[121]

Saravann S, Aravinth SS, Rameshkumar M. 2017. A novel approach in agriculture automation for sugarcane farming by human assisting care robot. International Journal of Agricultural Science and Research 7(4):107−112
[122]

Sujaritha M, Annadurai S, Satheeshkumar J, Kowshik Sharan S, Mahesh L. 2017. Weed detecting robot in sugarcane fields using fuzzy real time classifier. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 134:160−171

doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.01.008
[123]

Sun J, Sun C, Li Z, Qian Y, Li T. 2024. Prediction method of sugarcane important phenotype data based on multi-model and multi-task. Plos One 19(12):e0312444

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312444
[124]

Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI). 2020. Development of Variable Swath Herbicide Applicator for selective weedicide application in sugarcane fields. Project details available at IARI website https://iari.res.in/bms/externally-funded-projects/view_project_details.php?proid=147422415
[125]

Kayode JF, Amudipe SO, Nwodo CW, Afolalu SA, Akinola AO, et al. 2024. Development of remote controlled solar powered pesticide sprayer vehicle. Discover Applied Sciences 6:101

doi: 10.1007/s42452-024-05748-x
[126]

Mehdi F, Cao Z, Zhang S, Gan Y, Cai W, et al. 2024. Factors affecting the production of sugarcane yield and sucrose accumulation: suggested potential biological solutions. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1374228

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1374228
[127]

Liu Q, Xie S, Zhao X, Liu Y, Xing Y, et al. 2021. Drought sensitivity of sugarcane cultivars shapes rhizosphere bacterial community patterns in response to water stress. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:732989

doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.732989
[128]

Rao CM, Rao PS, Charamathi M, Adilakshmi D, Devi TC, et al. 2024. Sugarcane clones suitable for water logged conditions of Andhra Pradesh. Biological Forum – An International Journal 16(1):323−329
[129]

Misra V, Solomon S, Ansari, MI. 2016. Impact of drought on post-harvest quality of sugarcane crop. Advances in Life Sciences 20(5):9496−9505
[130]

de A Silva M, Jifon JL, da Silva JAG, Sharma V. 2007. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 19(3):193−201

doi: 10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003
[131]

Chandran K, Gomathi R, Nisha M, Kumar RA. 2019. Breeding for waterlogging tolerance in sugarcane. Journal of Sugarcane Research 9(1):29−44
[132]

Atkinson NJ, Urwin PE. 2012. The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field. Journal of Experimental Botany 63(10):3523−3543

doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers100
[133]

Chaudhry S, Sidhu GPS. 2022. Climate change regulated abiotic stress mechanisms in plants: a comprehensive review. Plant Cell Reports 41(1):1−31

doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02759-5
[134]

Sampedro-Guerrero J, Vives-Peris V, Gomez-Cadenas A, Clausell-Terol C. 2023. Efficient strategies for controlled release of nanoencapsulated phytohormones to improve plant stress tolerance. Plant Methods 19(1):47

doi: 10.1186/s13007-023-01025-x
[135]

Das A, Das B. 2019. Nanotechnology a potential tool to mitigate abiotic stress in crop plants. In Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants, ed. Oilveira ABD. IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.83562
[136]

Aguirre-Becerra H, Feregrino-Pérez AA, Esquivel K, Perez-Garcia CE, Vazquez-Hernandez MC, et al. 2022. Nanomaterials as an alternative to increase plant resistance to abiotic stresses. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:1023636

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.1023636
[137]

Sun D, Hussain HI, Yi Z, Rookes JE, Kong L, et al. 2018. Delivery of abscisic acid to plants using glutathione responsive mesoporous silica nanoparticles. Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology 18(3):1615−1625

doi: 10.1166/jnn.2018.14262
[138]

Yin JM, Wang HL, Yang ZK, Wang J, Wang Z, et al. 2020. Engineering lignin nanomicroparticles for the antiphotolysis and controlled release of the plant growth regulator abscisic acid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 68(28):7360−7368

doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.0c02835
[139]

Marques Mandaji C, da Silva Pena R, Campos Chisté R. 2022. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds extracted from plants of genus Hibiscus: a review of selected techniques and applications. Food Research International 151:110820

doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2021.110820
[140]

Morales-Medina R, Drusch S, Acevedo F, Castro-Alvarez A, Benie A, et al. 2022. Structure, controlled release mechanisms and health benefits of pectins as an encapsulation material for bioactive food components. Food & Function 21(13):10870−10881
[141]

Zabot GL, Schaefer Rodrigues F, Polano Ody L, Vinícius Tres M, Herrera E, et al. 2025. Encapsulation of bioactive compounds for food and agricultural applications. Polymers 14(19):4194

doi: 10.3390/polym14194194
[142]

Atanda SA, Shaibu RO, Agunbiade FO. 2022. Nanoparticles in agriculture: balancing food security and environmental sustainability. Discover Agriculture 3:26

doi: 10.1007/s44279-025-00159-x
[143]

Kaur A, Bhatt DP, Raja L. 2022. Application of nanotechnology in agriculture, with a focus on insect pest management. Nano World Jounal 8(S1):S76−S82

doi: 10.17756/nwj.2022-s1-015
[144]

Fraceto LF, Grillo R, de Medeiros GA, Scognamiglio V, Rea G, et al. 2016. Nanotechnology in agriculture: which innovation potential does it have? Frontiers in Environmental Science 4:20

doi: 10.3389/fenvs.2016.00020
[145]

Sodhi GK, Wijesekara T, Kumawat KC, Adhikari P, Joshi K, et al. 2025. Nanomaterials−plants−microbes interaction: plant growth promotion and stress mitigation. Frontiers in Microbiology 15:1516794

doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2024.1516794
[146]

Dilnawaz F, Misra AN, Apostolova E. 2023. Involvement of nanoparticles in mitigating plant's abiotic stress. Plant Stress 10:100280

doi: 10.1016/j.stress.2023.100280
[147]

Noori A, Hasanuzzaman M, Roychowdhury R, Sarraf M, Afzal S, et al. 2024. Silver nanoparticles in plant health: Physiological response to phytotoxicity and oxidative stress. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 209:108538

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108538
[148]

Elsheery NI, Sunoj VSJ, Wen Y, Zhu JJ, Muralidharan G et al. 2020. Foliar application of nanoparticles mitigates the chilling effect on photosynthesis and photoprotection in sugarcane. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 149:50−60

doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2020.01.035
[149]

Panotra N, Chandana VM, Parmar B, Ashoka P, Pandey SK, et al. 2024. Potential of the advanced precision irrigation techniques for enhanced protected cultivation systems in the developing nations. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 14(12):584−607

doi: 10.9734/ijecc/2024/v14i124647
[150]

Wu X, Lyu F, Zhang Y. 2024. Study on the growth promoting mechanism and mode of different nanomaterials on Arabidopsis thaliana. Open Access Library Journal 11:e12653

doi: 10.4236/oalib.1112653
[151]

El-Saadony MT, Saad AM, Soliman SM, Salem HM, Desoky ESM, et al. 2022. Role of nanoparticles in enhancing crop tolerance to abiotic stress: a comprehensive review. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:946717

doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.946717
[152]

Faiq MH, Noori MS. 2021. Utilization of phytohormones for successful crop production under environmental stress conditions. Journal of Scientific Agriculture 5:60−66

doi: 10.25081/jsa.2021.v5.7281
[153]

Tayyab N, Naz R, Yasmin H, Nosheen A, Keyani R, et al. 2020. Combined seed and foliar pre-treatments with exogenous methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid mitigate drought-induced stress in maize. PLoS One 15(5):e0232269

doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232269