Search
2011 Volume 26
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Logical mechanism design

More Information
  • Corresponding authors: Iyad Rahwan ;  Kate Larson
  • Abstract: Game theory is becoming central to the design and analysis of computational mechanisms in which multiple entities interact strategically. The tools of mechanism design are used extensively to engineer incentives for truth revelation into resource allocation (e.g. combinatorial auctions) and preference aggregation protocols (e.g. voting). We argue that mechanism design can also be useful in the design of logical inference procedures. In particular, it can help us understand and engineer inference procedures when knowledge is distributed among self-interested agents. We set a research agenda for this emerging area, and point to some early research efforts.
  • 加载中
  • Cite this article

    Iyad Rahwan, Kate Larson. 2011. Logical mechanism design. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:421 doi: 10.1017/S0269888910000421
    Iyad Rahwan, Kate Larson. 2011. Logical mechanism design. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:421 doi: 10.1017/S0269888910000421

Article Metrics

Article views(14) PDF downloads(19)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Logical mechanism design

  • Corresponding authors: Iyad Rahwan ;  Kate Larson
The Knowledge Engineering Review  26 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888910000421  (2011)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: Game theory is becoming central to the design and analysis of computational mechanisms in which multiple entities interact strategically. The tools of mechanism design are used extensively to engineer incentives for truth revelation into resource allocation (e.g. combinatorial auctions) and preference aggregation protocols (e.g. voting). We argue that mechanism design can also be useful in the design of logical inference procedures. In particular, it can help us understand and engineer inference procedures when knowledge is distributed among self-interested agents. We set a research agenda for this emerging area, and point to some early research efforts.

    • Note that one can easily define a qualified version of this condition, requiring ⊨ to be proof-theoretic implementable for a class of agent preferences or a restricted strategy space.

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 20112011Cambridge University Press
References (15)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Iyad Rahwan, Kate Larson. 2011. Logical mechanism design. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:421 doi: 10.1017/S0269888910000421
    Iyad Rahwan, Kate Larson. 2011. Logical mechanism design. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 26:421 doi: 10.1017/S0269888910000421
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return