Search
2014 Volume 29
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation

More Information
  • Abstract: In the last few years, the number of papers devoted to applications of agent-based technologies to traffic and transportation engineering has grown enormously. Thus, it seems to be the appropriate time to shed light over the achievements of the last decade, on the questions that have been successfully addressed, as well as on remaining challenging issues. In the present paper, we review the literature related to the areas of agent-based traffic modelling and simulation, and agent-based traffic control and management. Later we discuss and summarize the main achievements and the challenges.
  • 加载中
  • Arentze T., Timmermans H.2005. Representing mental maps and cognitive learning in micro-simulation models of activity-travel choice dynamics. Transportation32, 321–340.

    Google Scholar

    Arentze T., Timmermans H.2008. Albatross: overview of the model, application and experiences. In Innovation in Travel Modeling 2008 Conference, Portland.

    Google Scholar

    Au T.-C., Shahidi N., Stone P.2011. Enforcing liveness in autonomous traffic management. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Burgard, W. & Roth, D. (eds). The AAAI Press, 1317–1322.

    Google Scholar

    Auld J., Mohammadian A.2012. Activity planning process in the agent-based dynamic activity planning and travel scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transportation Research Part A46, 1386–1403.

    Google Scholar

    Balan G., Luke S.2006. History-based traffic control. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Nakashima, H., Wellman, M. P., Weiss, G. & Stone, P. (eds). ACM Press, 616–621.

    Google Scholar

    Balmer M., Cetin N., Nagel K., Raney B.2004. Towards truly agent-based traffic and mobility simulations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, AAMAS, Jennings, N., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L. & Tambe, M. (eds). IEEE Computer Society, vol. 1, 60–67.

    Google Scholar

    Balmer M., Rieser M., Meister K., Charypar D., Lefebre N., Nagel K.2009. MATSim-T: architecture and simulation times. In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Bazzan A. L. & Klügl, F. (eds). IGI Global, 57–78.

    Google Scholar

    Barceló J. (ed.) 2010. Fundamentals of Traffic Simulation. Springer.

    Google Scholar

    Barceló J., Codina E., Casas J., Ferber J. L., García D.2004. Microscopic traffic simulation: a tool for the design, analysis and evaluation of intelligent transport systems. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems41, 173–203.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C.2005. A distributed approach for coordination of traffic signal agents. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems10(1), 131–164.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C., de Oliveira D., da Silva B. C.2010. Learning in groups of traffic signals. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence23, 560–568.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C., de Oliveira D., Klügl F., Nagel K.2008. Adapt or not to adapt—consequences of adapting driver and traffic light agents. In Adaptive Agents and Multi-Agent Systems III, Tuyls, K., Nowe, A., Guessoum, Z. & Kudenko, D. (eds). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 4865, 1–14. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C., do Amarante M. B., da Costa F. B.2012. Management of demand and routing in autonomous personal transportation. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems16(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C., Junges R.2006. Congestion tolls as utility alignment between agent and system optimum. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Nakashima, H., Wellman, M. P., Weiss, G. & Stone, P. (eds). ACM Press, 126–128.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C., Klügl F.2005. Case studies on the Braess paradox: simulating route recommendation and learning in abstract and microscopic models. Transportation Research C13(4), 299–319.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C., Klügl F.2008. Re-routing agents in an abstract traffic scenario. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Zaverucha G. & da Costa, A. L. (eds). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 5249, 63–72. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Bazzan A. L. C., Wahle J., Klügl F.1999. Agents in traffic modelling—from reactive to social behavior. In Advances in Artificial Intelligence, Extended version appeared in Proceedings of the UK Special Interest Group on Multi-Agent Systems (UKMAS), Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 1701, 303–306. Springer.

    Google Scholar

    Benenson I., Martens K.2008. Geosimulation of parking in the city. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation, at AAMAS 2008, May 13, Estoril, Portugal, Bazzan, A. L. C., Klügl, F. & Ossowski, S. (eds), 29–35.

    Google Scholar

    Bhat C. R., Koppelman F. S.2003. Activity-based modeling of travel demand. In Handbook of Transportation, Hall, R. (ed.). Springer, 39–65.

    Google Scholar

    Burmeister B., Doormann J., Matylis G.1997. Agent-oriented traffic simulation. Transactions of the Society for Computer Simulation14(2), 79–86.

    Google Scholar

    Camponogara E., Kraus W.Jr.2003. Distributed learning agents in urban traffic control. In The Portuguese Conference on AI, Moura-Pires, F. & Abreu, S. (eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2902, 324–335. Springer.

    Google Scholar

    Charypar D., Nagel K., Axhausen K. W.2007. An event-driven queue-based microsimulation of traffic flow. Transportation Research Record2003, 35–40.

    Google Scholar

    Chen B., Cheng H. H.2010. A review of the applications of agent technology in traffic and transportation systems. IEEE Transactions in Intelligent Transportation Systems11(2), 485–497.

    Google Scholar

    Chmura T., Pitz T.2007. An extended reinforcement algorithm for estimation of human behavior in congestion games. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation10(2).

    Google Scholar

    Davidsson P., Henesey L., Ramstedt L., Törnquist J., Wernstedt F.2005. An analysis of agent-based approaches to transport logistics. Transportation Research C13, 255–271.

    Google Scholar

    de Oliveira D., Ferreira P. R.Jr, Bazzan A. L. C.2004. A swarm based approach for task allocation in dynamic agents organizations. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, AAMAS. IEEE Computer Society, vol. 3, 1252–1253.

    Google Scholar

    de Oliveira L. B., Camponogara E.2010. Multi-agent model predictive control of signaling split in urban traffic networks. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies18(1), 120–139.

    Google Scholar

    de Palma A., Ben-Akiva M., Brownstone D., Holt C., Magnac T., McFadden D., Moffatt P., Picard N., Train K., Wakker P., Walker J.2008. Risk, uncertainty and discrete choice models. Marketing Letters19, 269–285.

    Google Scholar

    Desjardins C., Laumônier J., Chaib-draa B.2009. Learning agents for collaborative driving. In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation, Bazzan, A. L. C. & Klügl, F. (eds). IGI Global, 240–260.

    Google Scholar

    Di Taranto M.1989. UTOPIA. In Proceedings of the IFAC-IFIP-IFORS Conference on Control, Computers, Communication in Transportation. International Federation of Automatic Control, 245–252.

    Google Scholar

    Dia H.2002. An agent-based approach to modeling driver route choice behaviour under the influence of real-time information. Transportation Research C10(5–6), 331–349.

    Google Scholar

    Diakaki C., Papageorgiou M., Aboudolas K.2002. A multivariable regulator approach to traffic-responsive network-wide signal control. Control Engineering Practice10(2), 183–195.

    Google Scholar

    do Amarante M. d. B., Bazzan A. L. C.2012. Agent-based simulation of mobility in real-world transportation networks: effects of acquiring information and replanning en-route. In Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-2012), Valencia, Spain, 1351–1352.

    Google Scholar

    Doniec A., Mandiau R., Piechowiak S., Espié S.2008. A behavioral multi-agent model for road traffic simulation. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence21(8), 1443–1454.

    Google Scholar

    Dresner K., Stone P.2004. Multiagent traffic management: a reservation-based intersection control mechanism. In Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Jennings, N., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L. & Tambe, M. (eds). IEEE Computer Society, 530–537.

    Google Scholar

    Dresner K., Stone P.2005. Multiagent traffic management: an improved intersection control mechanism. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Koenig, S., Kraus, S., Singh, M. P. & Wooldridge, M. (eds). ACM Press, 471–477.

    Google Scholar

    Dresner K., Stone P.2006. Multiagent traffic management: Opportunities for multiagent learning. In LAMAS 2005, Tuyls, K., Hoen, P. J., Verbeeck, K. & Sen, S. (eds). Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 3898, 129–138. Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Dresner K., Stone P.2008. A multiagent approach to autonomous intersection management. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research31, 591–656.

    Google Scholar

    Ehlert P. A. M., Rothkrantz L. J. M.2001. A reactive driving agent for microscopic traffic simulation. In Proceedings of the 15th European Simulation Conference, Prag, 2001, Kerckhoffs, E. J. H. & Snorek, M. (eds). SCS Publishing House, 943–949.

    Google Scholar

    Epstein J. M.2007. Generative Social Science: Studies in Agent-Based Computational Modeling (Princeton Studies in Complexity). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar

    Espié S., Auberlet J. M.2007. ARCHISIM: a behavioural multi-actor traffic simulation model for the study of a traffic system including ITS aspects. International Journal of ITS Research5, 7–16.

    Google Scholar

    Ettema D., Arentze T., Timmermans H.2011. Social influences on household location, mobility and activity choice in integrated micro-simulation models. Transportation Research Part A45, 283–295.

    Google Scholar

    France J., Ghorbani A. A.2003. A multiagent system for optimizing urban traffic. In Proceedings of the IEEE/WIC International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology. IEEE Computer Society, 411–414.

    Google Scholar

    Gartner N. H.1983. OPAC—a demand-responsive strategy for traffic signal control. Transportation Research Record906, 75–81.

    Google Scholar

    Gershenson C.2007. Design and Control of Self-organizing Systems. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel.

    Google Scholar

    Gilbert N.2007. Agent-based Models (Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences). Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar

    Gipps P. G.1981. A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation. Transportation Research Part B15, 105–111.

    Google Scholar

    Grether D., Chen Y., Rieser M., Beuck U., Nagel K.2008. Emergent effects in multi-agent simulations of road pricing. In 48th Congress of the European Regional Science Association, August 2008, Liverpool, UK.

    Google Scholar

    Guestrin C., Lagoudakis M. G., Parr R.2002. Coordinated reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), Sammut, C. & Hoffmann, A. G. (eds). Morgan Kaufmann, 227–234.

    Google Scholar

    Hackney J., Marchal F.2011. A coupled multi-agent microsimulation of social interactions and transportation behavior. Transportation Research A45, 296–309.

    Google Scholar

    Han Q., Arentze T., Timmermans H., Janssens D., Wets G.2009. A multi-agent modeling approach to simulate dynamic activity-travel patterns. In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Bazzan, A. L. & Klügl, F. (eds). IGI Global, 36–56.

    Google Scholar

    Han Q., Arentze T., Timmermans H., Janssens D., Wets G.2011. The effects of social networks on choice set dynamics: results of numerical simulations using an agent-based approach. Transportation Research A45, 310–322.

    Google Scholar

    Helbing D., Lämmer S., Lebacque P.2005. Self-organized control of irregular or perturbed network traffic. In Optimal Control and Dynamic Games, Deissenberg, C. & Hartl, R. (eds). Springer, 239.

    Google Scholar

    Henry J., Farges J. L., Tuffal J.1983. The PRODYN real time traffic algorithm. In Proceedings of the International Federation of Automatic Control (IFAC) Conference, Isermann, R. (ed.). IFAC, 307–312.

    Google Scholar

    Horni A., Nagel K., Axhausen K. W.2011. High-resolution destination choice in agent-based demand models. Working Paper 682, Institute for Transport Planning and Systems, ETH Zürich.

    Google Scholar

    Horni A., Scott D. M., Balmer M., Axhausen K. W.2009. Location choice modeling for shopping and leisure activities with matsim: combining micro-simulation and time geography. Transportation Research Record2135, 87–95.

    Google Scholar

    Hunt P. B., Robertson D. I., Bretherton R. D., Winton R. I.1981. SCOOT—a traffic responsive method of coordinating signals. TRRL Lab. Report 1014, Transport and Road Research Laboratory.

    Google Scholar

    Joubert J. W., Fourie P. J., Axhausen K. W.2010. Large-scale agent-based combined traffic simulation of private cars and commercial vehicles. Transportation Research Record2168, 24–32.

    Google Scholar

    Junges R., Bazzan A. L. C.2008. Evaluating the performance of DCOP algorithms in a real world, dynamic problem. In Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Automatic Agents and Multiagent Systems, Padgham, L., Parkes, D., Müller, J. & Parsons, S. (eds). IFAAMAS, 599–606.

    Google Scholar

    Kesting A., Treiber M., Helbing D.2009. Agents in traffic simulation. In Agents, Simulations and Applications, Uhrmacher, A. & Weyns, D. (eds). Taylor and Francis, 325–356.

    Google Scholar

    Klügl F., Bazzan A. L. C.2004. Simulated route decision behaviour: simple heuristics and adaptation. In Human Behaviour and Traffic Networks, Selten, R. & Schreckenberg, M. (eds). Springer, 285–304.

    Google Scholar

    Klügl F., Bazzan A. L. C.2012. Agent-based Modeling and Simulation. AI Magazine.

    Google Scholar

    Klügl F., Bazzan A. L. C., Wahle J.2003. Selection of information types based on personal utility—a testbed for traffic information markets. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), Gini, M., Ishida, T., Castelfranchi, C. & Lewis Johnson, W. (eds). ACM Press, 377–384.

    Google Scholar

    Klügl F., Rindsfüser G.2011. Agent-based route (and mode) choice simulation in real-world networks. In IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), Lyon, France, 22–29.

    Google Scholar

    Kosonen I.2003. Multi-agent fuzzy signal control based on real-time simulation. Transportation Research C11(5), 389–403.

    Google Scholar

    Koźlak J., Dobrowolski G., Kisiel-Dorohinicki M., Nawarecki E.2008. Anti-crisis management of city traffic using agent-based approach. Journal of Universal Computer Science14(14), 2359–2380.

    Google Scholar

    Ksontini F., Espié S., Guessoum Z., Mandiau R.2012. Traffic behavioral simulation in urban and suburban—representation of the drivers’ environment. In Advances on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Demazeau, Y., Müller, J. P., Rodríguez, J. M. C. & Pérez, J. B. (eds). Springer, 115–125.

    Google Scholar

    Kuyer L., Whiteson S., Bakker B., Vlassis N. A.2008. Multiagent reinforcement learning for urban traffic control using coordination graphs. In Proceedings of the ECML/PKDD, Antwerp, Belgium, 656–671.

    Google Scholar

    Lowrie P.1982. The Sydney coordinate adaptive traffic system—principles, methodology, algorithms. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Road Traffic Signalling, Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar

    Luo Y., Boloni L.2012. Modeling the conscious behavior of drivers for multi-lane highway driving. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Agent in Traffic and Transportation, Valencia.

    Google Scholar

    Machado A. M., Bazzan A. L. C.2011. Self-adaptation in a network of social drivers: using random boolean networks. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Organic Computing (OC 11), Müller-Schloer, C., Schmeck, H. & Ungerer, T. (eds). ACM, 33–40.

    Google Scholar

    Mandiau R., Champion A., Auberlet J.-M., Espié S., Kolski C.2008. Behaviour based on decision matrices for a coordination between agents in a urban traffic simulation. Applied Intelligence28(2), 121–138.

    Google Scholar

    McBreen J., Jensen P., Marchal F.2006. An agent-based simulation model of traffic congestion. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation, Bazzan, A. L. C., Chaib-Draa, B., Klügl, F. & Ossowski, S. (eds), 43–49.

    Google Scholar

    Nagel K., Schreckenberg M.1992. A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic. Journal de Physique I2, 2221–2229.

    Google Scholar

    Navarro L., Flacher F., Corruble V.2011. Dynamic level of detail for large scale agent-based urban simulations. In Proceedings of 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011), Tumer, K., Yolum, P., Sonenberg, L. & Stone (eds). IFAAMAS, 701–708.

    Google Scholar

    Nunes L., Oliveira E. C.2004. Learning from multiple sources. In Proccedings of the 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems, Jennings, N., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L. & Tambe, M. (eds). IEEE Computer Society, vol. 3, 1106–1113.

    Google Scholar

    de Oliveira D., Bazzan A. L. C.2009. Multiagent learning on traffic lights control: effects of using shared information. In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation, Bazzan, A. L. C. & Klügl, F. (eds). IGI Global, 307–321.

    Google Scholar

    de Oliveira D., Bazzan A. L. C., Lesser V.2005. Using cooperative mediation to coordinate traffic lights: a case study. In Proceedings of the 4th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS), Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Koenig, S., Kraus, S., Singh, M. P. & Wooldridge, M. (eds). IEEE Computer Society, 463–470.

    Google Scholar

    Ortúzar J., Willumsen L. G.2001. Modelling Transport, 3rd edition. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar

    Panwei S., Dia H.2006. A fuzzy neural approach to modeling behavioural rules in agent-based route choice simulations. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation, AAMAS 2006, May 9, Bazzan, A. L. C., Chaib-Draa, B., Klügl, F. & Ossowski, S. (eds), 70–78.

    Google Scholar

    Papageorgiou M.2003. Chapter 8: Traffic control. In Handbook of Transportation Science, Hall, R. W. (ed.). Kluwer Academic Publisher, 243–277.

    Google Scholar

    Paruchuri P., Pullalarevu A. R., Karlapalem K.2002. Multi agent simulation of unorganized traffic. In Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS). ACM Press, vol. 1, 176–183.

    Google Scholar

    Prashanth L., Bhatnagar S.2011. Reinforcement learning with function approximation for traffic signal control. IEEE Transaction on Intelligent Transportation Systems12(2), 412–421.

    Google Scholar

    Prothmann H., Tomforde S., Branke J., Hähner J., Müller-Schloer C., Schmeck H.2011. Organic traffic control. In Organic Computing A Paradigm Shift for Complex Systems, Müller-Schloer, C., Schmeck, H. & Ungerer, T. (eds). Springer, 431–446.

    Google Scholar

    Rindsfüser G., Klügl F., Freudenstein J.2004. Multi-agent simulation for the generation of individual activity programs. In Application of Agent Technology in Traffic and Transportation, Klügl, F., Bazzan, A. L. C. & Ossowski, S. (eds). Birkhäuser, 165–180.

    Google Scholar

    Rindt C. R., Marca J. E., McNally M. G.2002. An agent-based activity microsimulator kernel using a negotiation metaphor. Technical Report, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California.

    Google Scholar

    Robertson1969. TRANSYT: a traffic network study tool. Rep. LR 253, Road Res. Lab.

    Google Scholar

    Ronald N. A., Arentze T. A., Timmermans H. J. P.2011. The effects of different interaction protocols in agent-based simulation of social activities. International Journal of Agent Technologies and Systems3(2), 18–32.

    Google Scholar

    Roozemond D. A.2001. Using intelligent agents for pro-active, real-time urban intersection control. European Journal of Operational Research131(2), 293–301.

    Google Scholar

    Rossetti R. J. F., Bordini R. H., Bazzan A. L. C., Bampi S., Liu R., Van Vliet D.2002. Using BDI agents to improve driver modelling in a commuter scenario. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies10(5–6), 47–72.

    Google Scholar

    Rossetti R. J. F., Ferreira P. A. F., Braga R. A. M., Oliveira E. C.2008. Towards an artificial traffic control system. In Proceedings of the 11th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC 2008), Beijing, China, 14–19.

    Google Scholar

    Schepperle H., Böhm K.2007. Agent-based traffic control using auctions. In Proceedings of the CIA, Klusch, M., Hindriks, K. V., Papazoglou, M. P. & Sterling, L. (eds). Springer, 119–133.

    Google Scholar

    Schepperle H., Böhm K.2009. Valuation-aware traffic control—the notion and the issues. In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation, Bazzan, A. L. C. & Klügl, F. (eds). IGI Global, 218–239.

    Google Scholar

    Schmeck H.2005. Organic computing—a new vision for distributed embedded systems. In ISORC, Lee, S. (ed.). IEEE Computer Society, 201–203.

    Google Scholar

    Silva B. C. d., Basso E. W., Bazzan A. L. C., Engel P. M.2006. Dealing with non-stationary environments using context detection. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning ICML, Cohen, W. W. & Moore, A. (eds). ACM Press, 217–224.

    Google Scholar

    Steingröver M., Schouten R., Peelen S., Nijhuis E., Bakker B.2005. Reinforcement learning of traffic light controllers adapting to traffic congestion. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC 2005), Verbeeck, K., Tuyls, K., Nowé, A., Manderick, B. & Kuijpers, B. (eds). Koninklijke Vlaamse Academie van Belie voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten, 216–223.

    Google Scholar

    Strippgen D., Nagel K.2009. Multi-agent traffic simulation with cuda. In International Conference on High Performance Computing & Simulation, HPCS ‘09, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar

    Sun Z., Arentze T., Timmermans H.2012. A heterogeneous latent class model of activity rescheduling, route choice and information acquisition decision under multiple uncertain events. Transportation Research Part C25, 46–60.

    Google Scholar

    Teodorovic D.2008. Swarm intelligence systems for transportation engineering: principles and applications. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies16(6), 651–667.

    Google Scholar

    Timmermans H.2005, editor Progress in Activity-based Analysis. Elsevier.

    Google Scholar

    Timóteo I. J. P. M., Araújo M. R., Rossetti R. J. F., Oliveira E. C.2012. Using TraSMAPI for the assessment of multi-agent traffic management solutions. Progress in Artificial Intelligence1, 157–164.

    Google Scholar

    Tumer K., Welch Z. T., Agogino A.2008. Aligning social welfare and agent preferences to alleviate traffic congestion. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Padgham, L., Parkes, D., Müller, J. & Parsons, S. (eds). IFAAMAS, 655–662.

    Google Scholar

    Tumer K., Welch Z. T., Agogino A.2009. Traffic congestion management as a learning agent coordination problem. In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation, Bazzan, A. L. C. & Klügl, F. (eds). IGI Global, 261–279.

    Google Scholar

    van Katwijk R., van Koningsbruggen P.2002. Coordination of traffic management instruments using agent technology. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies10(5–6), 455–471.

    Google Scholar

    van Katwijk R., van Koningsbruggen P., De Schutter B., Hellendoorn J.2005. A test bed for multi-agent control systems in road traffic management. In Applications of Agent Technology in Traffic and Transportation Whitestein Series in Software Agent Technologies and Autonomic Computing,, Klügl, F., Bazzan, A. L. C. & Ossowski, S. (eds). Birkhäuser, 113–131.

    Google Scholar

    Vasirani M., Ossowski S.2009. A market-based approach to reservation-based urban road traffic management. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Decker, K., Sichman, J., Sierra, C. & Castelfranchi, C. (eds). IFAAMAS, 617–624.

    Google Scholar

    Vasirani M., Ossowski S.2011. A computational market for distributed control of urban road traffic systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems12(2), 313–321.

    Google Scholar

    Wahle J., Bazzan A. L. C., Klügl F.2002. The impact of real time information in a two route scenario using agent based simulation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies10(5–6), 73–91.

    Google Scholar

    Waizman G., Shoval S., Benenson I.2012. Micro-simulation model for assessing the risk of car-pedestrian road accidents. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Agent in Traffic and Transportation, Valencia.

    Google Scholar

    Wang F.-Y.2008. Toward a revolution in transportation operations: AI for complex systems. IEEE Intelligent Systems23(6), 8–13.

    Google Scholar

    Wardrop J. G.1952. Some theoretical aspects of road traffic research. Proceedings of the Institute of Civil Engineers2, 325–378.

    Google Scholar

    Wiering M.2000. Multi-agent reinforcement learning for traffic light control. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2000), Stanford, CA, USA, 1151–1158.

    Google Scholar

    Yamashita T., Izumi K., Kurumatani K.2004. Analysis of the effect of route information sharing on reduction of traffic congestion. In Application of Agent Technology in Traffic and Transportation, Klügl, F., Bazzan, A. L. C. & Ossowski, S. (eds). Birkhäuser, 99–112.

    Google Scholar

    Yamashita T., Kurumatani K.2009. New approach to smooth traffic flow with route information sharing. In Multi-Agent Systems for Traffic and Transportation, Bazzan, A. L. C. & Klügl, F. (eds). IGI Global, 291–306.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang C., Abdallah S., Lesser V.2009. Integrating organizational control into multi-agent learning. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), ao Sichman, J. S., Decker, K. S., Sierra, C. & Castelfranchi, C. (eds), 757–764. Budapest, Hungary.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang L., Levinson D.2004. Agent-based approach to travel demand modeling. Journal of the Transportation Research Board1898, 28–36.

    Google Scholar

    Zhu S., Levinson D., Zhang L.2008. Agent-based route choice with learning and exchange of information. In Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting 2008 Paper Nr.08-2152.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Ana L. C. Bazzan, Franziska Klügl. 2014. A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 29(3)375−403, doi: 10.1017/S0269888913000118
    Ana L. C. Bazzan, Franziska Klügl. 2014. A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 29(3)375−403, doi: 10.1017/S0269888913000118

Article Metrics

Article views(23) PDF downloads(123)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation

The Knowledge Engineering Review  29 2014, 29(3): 375−403  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: In the last few years, the number of papers devoted to applications of agent-based technologies to traffic and transportation engineering has grown enormously. Thus, it seems to be the appropriate time to shed light over the achievements of the last decade, on the questions that have been successfully addressed, as well as on remaining challenging issues. In the present paper, we review the literature related to the areas of agent-based traffic modelling and simulation, and agent-based traffic control and management. Later we discuss and summarize the main achievements and the challenges.

    • Ana Bazzan is partially supported by CNPq and Franziska Klügl by VINNOVA in the VINMER program.

    • http://www.citiesinmotion.com/

    • http://www.ptv-vision.com

    • http://www.sias.com/ng/sparamicshome/sparamicshome.htm

    • http://www.aimsun.com

    • http://sumo.sourceforge.net/

    • Due to the fact that coordination has a broader meaning in multiagent systems, we use the terms progression or synchronisation to designate what in traffic engineering is denominated coordinated, synchronised, or progressive systems (popularly known as green waves).

    • MATSim - introduced in Section 3—is definitely a huge step into that direction, but after construction and full refinement of a daily plan, the agent is committed to this plan so that it has to execute it without interruption. Thus, in fact, one cannot yet affirm that this approach allows agents to be completely flexible.

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 2013Cambridge University Press
References (117)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Ana L. C. Bazzan, Franziska Klügl. 2014. A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 29(3)375−403, doi: 10.1017/S0269888913000118
    Ana L. C. Bazzan, Franziska Klügl. 2014. A review on agent-based technology for traffic and transportation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 29(3)375−403, doi: 10.1017/S0269888913000118
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return