Search
  • All Journals
Advanced Search
Search articles by Title, Author, Keywords, DOI
7.7CiteScore
2.0Impact Factor
Advanced Search
MAP  >  The Knowledge Engineering Review
2017 Volume 32
Article Contents
Next Previous
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Inter-humanoid robot interaction with emphasis on detection: a comparison study

  • 1.

    Bio-Inspired System Design Lab

  • 2.

    Autonomous Agents Laboratory

  • These authors contributed equally to this work.

More Information
  • Abstract: Robot Interaction has always been a challenge in collaborative robotics. In tasks comprising Inter-Robot Interaction, robot detection is very often needed. We explore humanoid robots detection because, humanoid robots can be useful in many scenarios, and everything from helping elderly people live in their own homes to responding to disasters. Cameras are chosen because they are reach and cheap sensors, and there are lots of mature two-dimensional (2D) and 3D computer vision libraries which facilitate Image analysis. To tackle humanoid robot detection effectively, we collected a data set of various humanoid robots with different sizes in different environments. Afterward, we tested the well-known cascade classifier in combination with several image descriptors like Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG), Local Binary Patterns (LBP), etc. on this data set. Among the feature sets, Haar-like has the highest accuracy, LBP the highest recall, and HOG the highest precision. Considering Inter-Robot Interaction, it is evident that false positives are less troublesome than false negatives, thus LBP is more useful than the others.
  • 加载中
  • Alves Jr, A.A., Andrade Filho, L.M., Barbosa, A.F., Bediaga, I., Cernicchiaro, G., Guerrer, G., Lima Jr, H.P., Machado, A.A., Magnin, J., Marujo, F. and De Miranda, J.M., 2008. The LHCb detector at the LHC. Journal of instrumentation, 3(08), p.S08005.

    Google Scholar

    Baltes J., Tu K.-Y., Sadeghnejad S. & Anderson J.2016. HuroCup: competition for multi-event humanoid robot athletes. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 1–14.

    Google Scholar

    Bar-Hillel A., Levi D., Krupka E. & Goldberg C.2010. Part-based feature synthesis for human detection. In European Conference on Computer Vision, 127–142. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar

    Cao Y. U., Fukunaga A. S. & Kahng A.1997. Cooperative mobile robotics: antecedents and directions. Autonomous Robots4, 7–27.

    Google Scholar

    Chaimowicz L., Sugar T., Kumar V. & Campos M. F.2001. An architecture for tightly coupled multi-robot cooperation. In Proceedings 2001 ICRA, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2001, 2992–2997.

    Google Scholar

    Coates A. & Ng A. Y.2010. Multi-camera object detection for robotics, In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), 2010, 412–419.

    Google Scholar

    Dalal N. & Triggs B.2005. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection, InIEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005, CVPR 2005, 886–893.

    Google Scholar

    Discant A., Rogozan A., Rusu C. & Bensrhair A.2007. Sensors for obstacle detection-a survey, In 30th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology, 100–105.

    Google Scholar

    Dollár P., Belongie S. & Perona P.2010. The Fastest Pedestrian Detector in the West.BMVC2(3).

    Google Scholar

    Dollar P., Wojek C., Schiele B. & Perona P.2012. Pedestrian detection: An evaluation of the state of the art. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence34.4,743–761.

    Google Scholar

    Dollár P., Tu Z., Perona P. & Belongie S.2009. Integral channel features, 91–1.

    Google Scholar

    Dollár P., Tu Z., Tao H. & Belongie S.2007. Feature mining for image classification, In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007. CVPR'07, 1–8.

    Google Scholar

    Felzenszwalb P., McAllester D. & Ramanan D.2008. A discriminatively trained, multiscale, deformable part model, In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008, CVPR 2008, 1–8.

    Google Scholar

    Felzenszwalb P. F., Girshick R. B., McAllester D. & Ramanan D.2010. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence32,1627–1645.

    Google Scholar

    Gan G. & Cheng J.2011. Pedestrian detection based on HOG-LBP feature, InSeventh International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS), 2011, 1184–1187.

    Google Scholar

    Gerndt R., Seifert D., Baltes J. H., Sadeghnejad S. & Behnke S.2015. Humanoid robots in soccer: robots versus humans in RoboCup 2050. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine22,147–154.

    Google Scholar

    Guizzo E. & Ackerman E.2012. How rethink robotics built its new Baxter robot worker. http://spectrum.ieee.org/robotics/industrial-robots/rethink-robotics-baxter-robot-factory-worker.

    Google Scholar

    Lin Z. & Davis L. S.2008. A pose-invariant descriptor for human detection and segmentation. In Computer Vision–ECCV 2008. Springer,423–436.

    Google Scholar

    Ma Y., Chen X. & Chenm G.2011. Pedestrian detection and tracking using HOG and oriented-LBP features. Network and Parallel Computing,176–184.

    Google Scholar

    Maji S., Berg A. C. & Malik J.2008. Classification using intersection kernel support vector machines is efficient, In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2008, CVPR 2008, 1–8.

    Google Scholar

    Moeslund T. B. & Granum E.2001. A survey of computer vision-based human motion capture. Computer Vision and Image Understanding81,231–268.

    Google Scholar

    Ruiz del Solar J., Verschae R., Arenas M. & Loncomilla P.2010. Play Ball!. In IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 17(4), 43–53.

    Google Scholar

    Schneiderman H. & Kanade T.2000. A statistical method for 3D object detection applied to faces and cars, In Proceedings. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2000, 746–751.

    Google Scholar

    Sabzmeydani P. & Mori G.2007. Detecting pedestrians by learning shapelet features, InIEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2007, CVPR'07, 1–8.

    Google Scholar

    Schwartz W. R., Kembhavi A., Harwood D. & Davis L. S.2009. Human detection using partial least squares analysis, InIEEE 12th international conference on Computer Vision, 2009 , 24–31.

    Google Scholar

    Stone P.1998. Layered Learning in Multiagent Systems: A Winning Approach to Robotic Soccer. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

    Viola P. & Jones M. J.2004. Robust real-time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision57,137–154.

    Google Scholar

    Walk S., Majer N., Schindler K. & Schiele B.2010. New features and insights for pedestrian detection, InIEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2010 , 1030–1037.

    Google Scholar

    Wang X., Han T. X. & Yan S.2009. An HOG-LBP human detector with partial occlusion handling, InIEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision, 2009, 32–39.

    Google Scholar

    Wojek C. & Schiele B.2008. A Performance Evaluation of Single and Multi-feature People Detection. In Proceedings of the 30th DAGM symposium on Pattern Recognition, Rigoll, G. (ed.). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg,82–91.

    Google Scholar

    Zaier R.2012. The Future of Humanoid Robots – Research and Applications.InTechCorp.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Taher Abbas Shangari, Vida Shams, Bita Azari, Faraz Shamshirdar, Jacky Baltes, Soroush Sadeghnejad. 2017. Inter-humanoid robot interaction with emphasis on detection: a comparison study. The Knowledge Engineering Review 32(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000321
    Taher Abbas Shangari, Vida Shams, Bita Azari, Faraz Shamshirdar, Jacky Baltes, Soroush Sadeghnejad. 2017. Inter-humanoid robot interaction with emphasis on detection: a comparison study. The Knowledge Engineering Review 32(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000321
    shu
Download PDF

Article Metrics

Article views(32) PDF downloads(24)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Inter-humanoid robot interaction with emphasis on detection: a comparison study

  • 1.

    Bio-Inspired System Design Lab

  • 2.

    Autonomous Agents Laboratory

  • Published online: 02 February 2017
The Knowledge Engineering Review  32,  2017, 32(1)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: Robot Interaction has always been a challenge in collaborative robotics. In tasks comprising Inter-Robot Interaction, robot detection is very often needed. We explore humanoid robots detection because, humanoid robots can be useful in many scenarios, and everything from helping elderly people live in their own homes to responding to disasters. Cameras are chosen because they are reach and cheap sensors, and there are lots of mature two-dimensional (2D) and 3D computer vision libraries which facilitate Image analysis. To tackle humanoid robot detection effectively, we collected a data set of various humanoid robots with different sizes in different environments. Afterward, we tested the well-known cascade classifier in combination with several image descriptors like Histograms of Oriented Gradients (HOG), Local Binary Patterns (LBP), etc. on this data set. Among the feature sets, Haar-like has the highest accuracy, LBP the highest recall, and HOG the highest precision. Considering Inter-Robot Interaction, it is evident that false positives are less troublesome than false negatives, thus LBP is more useful than the others.

    HTML

    Acknowledgments

    • The authors would like to thank the Bio-Inspired System Design Laboratory (BInSDeLa) of Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran and also Autonomous Agents Laboratory, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. This research has been done in collaboration of both universities under the corporation protocol, started from 2014.

    • These authors contributed equally to this work.

    Rights and permissions
    • © Cambridge University Press, 2017 2017Cambridge University Press
References (31)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Taher Abbas Shangari, Vida Shams, Bita Azari, Faraz Shamshirdar, Jacky Baltes, Soroush Sadeghnejad. 2017. Inter-humanoid robot interaction with emphasis on detection: a comparison study. The Knowledge Engineering Review 32(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000321
    Taher Abbas Shangari, Vida Shams, Bita Azari, Faraz Shamshirdar, Jacky Baltes, Soroush Sadeghnejad. 2017. Inter-humanoid robot interaction with emphasis on detection: a comparison study. The Knowledge Engineering Review 32(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000321
    shu

    • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return