|
Adadi , A. & Berrada , M. 2018. Peeking inside the black-box: a survey on explainable artificial intelligence (xai). IEEE Access 6, 52138–52160.
Google Scholar
|
|
Al-Abdulkarim , L., Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2016a. A methodology for designing systems to reason with legal cases using abstract dialectical frameworks. Artificial Intelligence and Law 24(1), 1–49.
Google Scholar
|
|
Al-Abdulkarim , L., Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2016b. Statement Types in Legal Argument. IOS Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Al-Abdulkarim , L., Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. J. 2016c. Angelic secrets: bridging from factors to facts in us trade secrets. In JURIX, 113–118.
Google Scholar
|
|
Al-Abdulkarim , L., Atkinson , K., Bench-Capon , T., Whittle , S., Williams , R. & Wolfenden , C. 2019. Noise induced hearing loss: building an application using the angelic methodology. Argument & Computation 10(1), 5–22.
Google Scholar
|
|
Aleven , V. A. 1997. Teaching Case-Based Argumentation Through a Model and Examples. Citeseer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Almpani , S. & Stefaneas , P. S. 2017. On proving and argumentation. In AIC, 72–84.
Google Scholar
|
|
Amgoud , L. & Cayrol , C. 2002a. Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Automated Reasoning 29(2), 125–169.
Google Scholar
|
|
Amgoud , L. & Cayrol , C. 2002b. A reasoning model based on the production of acceptable arguments. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 34(1–3), 197–215.
Google Scholar
|
|
Amgoud , L., Cayrol , C., Lagasquie-Schiex , M.-C. & Livet , P. 2008. On bipolarity in argumentation frameworks. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 23(10), 1062–1093.
Google Scholar
|
|
Amgoud , L. & Prade , H. 2006. Explaining qualitative decision under uncertainty by argumentation. In Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 21, 219. AAAI Press, MIT Press, 1999.
Google Scholar
|
|
Amgoud , L. & Prade , H. 2009. Using arguments for making and explaining decisions. Artificial Intelligence 173(3–4), 413–436.
Google Scholar
|
|
Amgoud , L. & Serrurier , M. 2007. Arguing and explaining classifications. In International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, 164–177, Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Amgoud , L. & Serrurier , M. 2008. Agents that argue and explain classifications. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 16(2), 187–209.
Google Scholar
|
|
Anjomshoae , S., Najjar , A., Calvaresi , D. & Främling , K. 2019. Explainable agents and robots: results from a systematic literature review. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 1078–1088. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Google Scholar
|
|
Antaki , C. & Leudar , I. 1992. Explaining in conversation: towards an argument model. European Journal of Social Psychology 22(2), 181–194.
Google Scholar
|
|
Arioua , A., Tamani , N., Croitoru , M. & Buche , P. 2014. Query failure explanation in inconsistent knowledge bases: a dialogical approach. In International Conference on Innovative Techniques and Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 119–133. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2007a. Action-based alternating transition systems for arguments about action. In AAAI, 7, 24–29.
Google Scholar
|
|
Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2007b. Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artificial Intelligence 171(10–15), 855–874.
Google Scholar
|
|
Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2018. Taking account of the actions of others in value-based reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 254, 1–20.
Google Scholar
|
|
Atkinson , K., Bench-Capon , T. & Bollegala , D. 2020. Explanation in ai and law: past, present and future. Artificial Intelligence, 103387.
Google Scholar
|
|
Atkinson , K., Bench-Capon , T. J. & McBurney , P. 2005a. Multi-agent argumentation for edemocracy. In EUMAS, 35–46.
Google Scholar
|
|
Atkinson , K., Bench-Capon , T. & Mcburney , P. 2005b. A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 11(2), 153–171.
Google Scholar
|
|
Atkinson , K. M., Bench-Capon , T. J., Cartwright , D. & Wyner , A. Z. 2011. Semantic models for policy deliberation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 81–90.
Google Scholar
|
|
Azhar , M. Q. & Sklar , E. I. 2016. Analysis of empirical results on argumentation-based dialogue to support shared decision making in a human-robot team. In 2016 25th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 861–866. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Azhar , M. Q. & Sklar , E. I. 2017. A study measuring the impact of shared decision making in a human-robot team. The International Journal of Robotics Research 36(5–7), 461–482.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bandara , A. K., Kakas , A. C., Lupu , E. C. & Russo , A. 2009. Using argumentation logic for firewall configuration management. In 2009 IFIP/IEEE International Symposium on Integrated Network Management, 180–187. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bandara , A. K., Kakas , A., Lupu , E. C. & Russo , A. 2006. Using argumentation logic for firewall policy specification and analysis. In International Workshop on Distributed Systems: Operations and Management, 185–196. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Baroni , P., Borsato , S., Rago , A. & Toni , F. 2018. The “games of argumentation” web platform. In COMMA, 447–448.
Google Scholar
|
|
Baroni , P., Caminada , M. & Giacomin , M. 2011. An introduction to argumentation semantics. Knowledge Engineering Review 26(4), 365.
Google Scholar
|
|
Baroni , P., Rago , A. & Toni , F. 2018. How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation? In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Google Scholar
|
|
Baroni , P., Romano , M., Toni , F., Aurisicchio , M. & Bertanza , G. 2015. Automatic evaluation of design alternatives with quantitative argumentation. Argument & Computation 6(1), 24–49.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bassiliades , N., Spanoudakis , N. I. & Kakas , A. C. 2018. Towards multipolicy argumentation. In Proceedings of the 10th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1–10.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bench-Capon , T. 2002. Value based argumentation frameworks. arXiv preprint cs/0207059.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bench-Capon , T., Atkinson , K. & Chorley , A. 2005. Persuasion and value in legal argument. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(6), 1075–1097.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bench-Capon , T. J. 1998. Specification and implementation of toulmin dialogue game. In Proceedings of JURIX, 98, 5–20.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bench-Capon , T. J. 2003a. Persuasion in practical argument using value-based argumentation frameworks. Journal of Logic and Computation 13(3), 429–448.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bench-Capon , T. J. 2003b. Try to see it my way: modelling persuasion in legal discourse. Artificial Intelligence and Law 11(4), 271–287.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bench-Capon , T. J. 2020. Before and after dung: argumentation in ai and law. Argument & Computation (Preprint), 1–18.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bench-Capon , T. J. M., Geldard , T. & Leng , P. H. 2000. A method for the computational modelling of dialectical argument with dialogue games. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8(2–3), 233–254.
Google Scholar
|
|
Besnard , P. & Hunter , A. 2001. A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence 128(1–2), 203–235.
Google Scholar
|
|
Besnard , P. & Hunter , A. 2008. Elements of Argumentation, 47. MIT Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Besnard , P. & Hunter , A. 2009. Argumentation based on classical logic. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 133–152. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Betz , G., Hamann , M., Mchedlidze , T. & von Schmettow , S. 2019. Applying argumentation to structure and visualize multi-dimensional opinion spaces. Argument & Computation 10(1), 23–40.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bex , F., Bench-Capon , T. J. & Verheij , B. 2011. What makes a story plausible? the need for precedents. In JURIX, 23–32.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bex , F., Budzynska , K. & Walton , D. 2012. Argumentation and explanation in the context of dialogue. Explanation-aware Computing ExaCt 2012 9, 6.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bex , F., Lawrence , J., Snaith , M. & Reed , C. 2013. Implementing the argument web. Communications of the ACM 56(10), 66–73.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bex , F., Prakken , H. & Reed , C. 2010. A formal analysis of the AIF in terms of the ASPIC framework. In COMMA, 99–110.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bex , F. & Walton , D. 2016. Combining explanation and argumentation in dialogue. Argument & Computation 7(1), 55–68.
Google Scholar
|
|
Biere , A., Heule , M. & van Maaren , H. 2009. Handbook of Satisfiability, 185. IOS Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bikakis , A. & Antoniou , G. 2010. Defeasible contextual reasoning with arguments in ambient intelligence. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 22(11), 1492–1506.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bistarelli , S., Pirolandi , D. & Santini , F. 2009. Solving weighted argumentation frameworks with soft constraints. In International Workshop on Constraint Solving and Constraint Logic Programming, 1–18. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Black , E. & Atkinson , K. 2011. Choosing persuasive arguments for action. In The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems-Volume 3, 905–912. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Google Scholar
|
|
Boltužić , F. & Šnajder , J. 2014a. Back up your stance: recognizing arguments in online discussions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, 49–58. Association for Computational Linguistics. http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W14-2107.
Google Scholar
|
|
Boltužić , F. & Šnajder , J. 2014b. Back up your stance: recognizing arguments in online discussions. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining, 49–58.
Google Scholar
|
|
Boltužić , F. & Šnajder , J. 2015. Identifying prominent arguments in online debates using semantic textual similarity. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, 110–115.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bonacina , M. P. 2017. Automated reasoning for explainable artificial intelligence. In ARCADE@ CADE, 24–28.
Google Scholar
|
|
Bonzon , E., Delobelle , J., Konieczny , S. & Maudet , N. 2016. A comparative study of ranking-based semantics for abstract argumentation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 30.
Google Scholar
|
|
Botschen , T., Sorokin , D. & Gurevych , I. 2018. Frame-and entity-based knowledge for common-sense argumentative reasoning. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining, 90–96.
Google Scholar
|
|
Burgemeestre , B., Hulstijn , J. & Tan , Y.-H. 2011. Value-based argumentation for justifying compliance. Artificial Intelligence and Law 19(2–3), 149.
Google Scholar
|
|
Buvac , S. & Mason , I. A. 1993. Propositional logic of context. In AAAI, 412–419.
Google Scholar
|
|
Caminada , M. 2008. A gentle introduction to argumentation semantics. Lecture Material, Summer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Caminada , M., Sá , S., Alcântara , J. & Dvoǎák , W. 2015. On the equivalence between logic programming semantics and argumentation semantics. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 58, 87–111.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cartwright , D. & Atkinson , K. 2009. Using computational argumentation to support e-participation. IEEE Intelligent Systems 24(5), 42–52.
Google Scholar
|
|
Carvalho , D. V., Pereira , E. M. & Cardoso , J. S. 2019. Machine learning interpretability: a survey on methods and metrics. Electronics 8(8), 832.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cayrol , C. & Lagasquie-Schiex , M.-C. 2005. On the acceptability of arguments in bipolar argumentation frameworks. In European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, 378–389. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cerutti , F., Giacomin , M. & Vallati , M. 2019. How we designed winning algorithms for abstract argumentation and which insight we attained. Artificial Intelligence 276, 1–40.
Google Scholar
|
|
Chapman , M., Balatsoukas , P., Ashworth , M., Curcin , V., Kökciyan , N., Essers , K., Sassoon , I., Modgil , S., Parsons , S. & Sklar , E. I. 2019. Computational argumentation-based clinical decision support. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 2345–2347. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Google Scholar
|
|
Charwat , G., Dvoǎák , W., Gaggl , S. A., Wallner , J. P. & Woltran , S. 2015. Methods for solving reasoning problems in abstract argumentation–a survey. Artificial Intelligence 220, 28–63.
Google Scholar
|
|
Chesnevar , C., McGinnis , J., Modgil , S., Rahwan , I., Reed , C., Simari , G., South , M., Vreeswijk , G. & Willmott , S. 2006. Towards an argument interchange format. The Knowledge Engineering Review 21(4), 293–316.
Google Scholar
|
|
Choo , J. & Liu , S. 2018. Visual analytics for explainable deep learning. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 38(4), 84–92.
Google Scholar
|
|
Ciatto , G., Calvaresi , D., Schumacher , M. I. & Omicini , A. 2015. An Abstract Framework for Agent-Based Explanations in AI. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Clark , C. E. 1919. Eisner v Macomber and some income tax problems. Yale LJ 29, 735.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cocarascu , O., Čyras , K. & Toni , F. 2018. Explanatory predictions with artificial neural networks and argumentation. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI 2018).
Google Scholar
|
|
Cocarascu , O. & Toni , F. 2016. Argumentation for machine learning: a survey. In COMMA, 219–230.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cocarascu , O. & Toni , F. 2018. Combining deep learning and argumentative reasoning for the analysis of social media textual content using small data sets. Computational Linguistics 44(4), 833–858.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cogan , E., Parsons , S. & McBurney , P. 2005. What kind of argument are we going to have today?. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 544–551.
Google Scholar
|
|
Cohen , A., Gottifredi , S., García , A. J. & Simari , G. R. 2014. A survey of different approaches to support in argumentation systems. The Knowledge Engineering Review 29(5), 513–550.
Google Scholar
|
|
Collenette , J., Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2020. An explainable approach to deducing outcomes in european court of human rights cases using ADFs. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications 326, 21–32.
Google Scholar
|
|
Collins , A., Magazzeni , D. & Parsons , S. 2019. Towards an argumentation-based approach to explainable planning. In ICAPS 2019 Workshop XAIP Program Chairs.
Google Scholar
|
|
Core , M. G., Lane , H. C., Van Lent , M., Gomboc , D., Solomon , S. & Rosenberg , M. 2006. Building explainable artificial intelligence systems. In AAAI, 1766–1773.
Google Scholar
|
|
Core , M. G., Lane , H. C., Van Lent , M., Solomon , S., Gomboc , D. & Carpenter , P. 2005. Toward question answering for simulations. In Proceedings of the IJCAI 2005 Workshop on Knowledge and Reasoning for Answering Questions (KRAQ05). Citeseer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Correia , V. 2012. The ethics of argumentation. Informal Logic 32(2), 222–241.
Google Scholar
|
|
Coste-Marquis , S., Konieczny , S., Marquis , P. & Ouali , M. A. 2012a. Selecting extensions in weighted argumentation frameworks. In COMMA, 12, 342–349.
Google Scholar
|
|
Coste-Marquis , S., Konieczny , S., Marquis , P. & Ouali , M. A. 2012b. Weighted attacks in argumentation frameworks. In Thirteenth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.
Google Scholar
|
|
Čyras , K. 2016. Argumentation-based reasoning with preferences. In International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 199–210. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Čyras , K., Birch , D., Guo , Y., Toni , F., Dulay , R., Turvey , S., Greenberg , D. & Hapuarachchi , T. 2019. Explanations by arbitrated argumentative dispute. Expert Systems with Applications 127, 141–156.
Google Scholar
|
|
Čyras , K., Delaney , B., Prociuk , D., Toni , F., Chapman , M., Dominguez , J. & Curcin , V. 2018. Argumentation for explainable reasoning with conflicting medical recommendations. In Proceedings of the Joint Proceedings of Reasoning with Ambiguous and Conflicting Evidence and Recommendations in Medicine (MedRACER 2018).
Google Scholar
|
|
Čyras , K., Fan , X., Schulz , C. & Toni , F. 2017. Assumption-based argumentation: disputes, explanations, preferences. Journal of Applied Logics-ifcolog Journal of Logics and their Applications 4(8), 2407–2456.
Google Scholar
|
|
Čyras , K. & Oliveira , T. 2019. Resolving conflicts in clinical guidelines using argumentation. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 1731–1739. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Google Scholar
|
|
Čyras , K., Satoh , K. & Toni , F. 2016a. Abstract argumentation for case-based reasoning. In Fifteenth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning.
Google Scholar
|
|
Čyras , K., Satoh , K. & Toni , F. 2016b. Explanation for case-based reasoning via abstract argumentation. In International Conference on the Principles of Argumentation.
Google Scholar
|
|
Czubaroff , J. 2007. Justice and argument: toward development of a dialogical argumentation theory. Argumentation and Advocacy 44(1), 18–35.
Google Scholar
|
|
Das , A. & Rad , P. 2020. Opportunities and challenges in explainable artificial intelligence (xai): a survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.11371.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dauphin , J. & Cramer , M. 2017. Aspic-end: structured argumentation with explanations and natural deduction. In International Workshop on Theorie and Applications of Formal Argumentation, 51–66. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dechter , R. & Cohen , D. 2003. Constraint Processing. Morgan Kaufmann.
Google Scholar
|
|
Deeks , A. 2019. The judicial demand for explainable artificial intelligence. Columbia Law Review 119(7), 1829–1850.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dheeru , D. & Taniskidou , E. K. 2017. UCI machine learning repository: mushroom data set.
Google Scholar
|
|
Donadello , I., Dragoni , M. & Eccher , C. 2019. Persuasive explanation of reasoning inferences on dietary data. In Contributo in Atti di Convegno (Proceeding).
Google Scholar
|
|
Došilović , F. K., Brčić , M. & Hlupić , N. 2018. Explainable artificial intelligence: a survey. In 2018 41st International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO), 0210–0215. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Doutre , S. & Mailly , J.-G. 2018. Constraints and changes: a survey of abstract argumentation dynamics. Argument & Computation 9(3), 223–248.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dung , P. M. 1995. An argumentation-theoretic foundation for logic programming. The Journal of Logic Programming 22(2), 151–177.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dung , P. M. 2016. An axiomatic analysis of structured argumentation with priorities. Artificial Intelligence 231, 107–150.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dung , P. M., Kowalski , R. A. & Toni , F. 2009. Assumption-based argumentation. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 199–218. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dung , P. M. & Son , T. C. 1995. Nonmonotonic inheritance, argumentation and logic programming. In International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 316–329. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dunne , P. E., Hunter , A., McBurney , P., Parsons , S. & Wooldridge , M. 2011. Weighted argument systems: basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results. Artificial Intelligence 175(2), 457–486.
Google Scholar
|
|
Dunne , P. E., Hunter , A., McBurney , P., Parsons , S. & Wooldridge , M. J. 2009. Inconsistency tolerance in weighted argument systems. In AAMAS (2), 851–858.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fan , X. & Toni , F. 2014. On computing explanations in abstract argumentation. In ECAI, 1005–1006.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fan , X. & Toni , F. 2015a. On computing explanations in argumentation. In Twenty-Ninth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fan , X. & Toni , F. 2015b. On explanations for non-acceptable arguments. In International Workshop on Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation, 112–127. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fan , X., Toni , F., Mocanu , A. & Williams , M. 2014. Dialogical two-agent decision making with assumption-based argumentation. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 533–540.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fazzinga , B., Flesca , S. & Furfaro , F. 2018. Probabilistic bipolar abstract argumentation frameworks: complexity results. In IJCAI, 1803–1809.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fernandez , A., Herrera , F., Cordon , O., del Jesus , M. J. & Marcelloni , F. 2019. Evolutionary fuzzy systems for explainable artificial intelligence: why, when, what for, and where to?. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine 14(1), 69–81.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fischer , L., Hasler , S., Deigmöller , J., Schnürer , T., Redert , M., Pluntke , U., Nagel , K., Senzel , C., Ploennigs , J., Richter , A. & Eggert , J. 2018. Which tool to use? grounded reasoning in everyday environments with assistant robots. In CogRob@ KR, 3–10.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fitting , M. 1992. The stable model semantics for logic programming.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fogues , R. L., Murukannaiah , P. K., Such , J. M. & Singh , M. P. 2017a. Sharing policies in multiuser privacy scenarios: incorporating context, preferences, and arguments in decision making. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI) 24(1), 1–29.
Google Scholar
|
|
Fogues , R. L., Murukannaiah , P. K., Such , J. M. & Singh , M. P. 2017b. Sosharp: recommending sharing policies in multiuser privacy scenarios. IEEE Internet Computing 21(6), 28–36.
Google Scholar
|
|
Friedrich , G. & Zanker , M. 2011. A taxonomy for generating explanations in recommender systems. AI Magazine 32(3), 90–98.
Google Scholar
|
|
Garcez , A. S., Gabbay , D. M. & Lamb , L. C. 2005. Value-based argumentation frameworks as neural-symbolic learning systems. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(6), 1041–1058.
Google Scholar
|
|
García , A., Chesñevar , C., Rotstein , N. & Simari , G. 2007. An abstract presentation of dialectical explanations in defeasible argumentation. In ArgNMR07, 17–32.
Google Scholar
|
|
García , A. J., Chesñevar, C. I., Rotstein, N. D. & Simari, G. R. 2013. Formalizing dialectical explanation support for argument-based reasoning in knowledge-based systems. Expert Systems with Applications 40(8), 3233–3247.
Google Scholar
|
|
Genitsaridi , I., Bikakis , A. & Antoniou , G. 2013. Deal: a distributed authorization language for ambient intelligence. In Pervasive and Ubiquitous Technology Innovations for Ambient Intelligence Environments, 188–204. IGI Global.
Google Scholar
|
|
Girle , R., Hitchcock , D., McBurney , P. & Verheij , B. 2003. Decision support for practical reasoning. In Argumentation Machines, 55–83. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gordon , T. F. 1993. The pleadings game. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(4), 239–292.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gordon , T. F. & Walton , D. 2009. Legal reasoning with argumentation schemes. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 137–146.
Google Scholar
|
|
Grando , M. A., Moss , L., Sleeman , D. & Kinsella , J. 2013. Argumentation-logic for creating and explaining medical hypotheses. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 58(1), 1–13.
Google Scholar
|
|
Green , N. L., Branon , M. & Roosje , L. 2019. Argument schemes and visualization software for critical thinking about international politics. Argument & Computation 10(1), 41–53.
Google Scholar
|
|
Guidotti , R., Monreale , A., Ruggieri , S., Turini , F., Giannotti , F. & Pedreschi , D. 2018. A survey of methods for explaining black box models. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 51(5), 1–42.
Google Scholar
|
|
Gunning , D. & Aha , D. W. 2019. Darpa’s explainable artificial intelligence program. AI Magazine 40(2), 44–58.
Google Scholar
|
|
Habernal , I. & Gurevych , I. 2016. What makes a convincing argument? empirical analysis and detecting attributes of convincingness in web argumentation. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 1214–1223.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hage , J. C., Leenes , R. & Lodder , A. R. 1993. Hard cases: a procedural approach. Artificial Intelligence and Law 2(2), 113–167.
Google Scholar
|
|
Hilton , D. J. 1990. Conversational processes and causal explanation. Psychological Bulletin 107(1), 65.
Google Scholar
|
|
Holzinger , A., Malle , B., Kieseberg , P., Roth , P. M., Müller , H., Reihs , R. & Zatloukal , K. 2017. Towards the augmented pathologist: challenges of explainable-ai in digital pathology. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.06657.
Google Scholar
|
|
Indrie , S. M. & Groza , A. 2010. Enacting argumentative web in semantic wikipedia. In 9th RoEduNet IEEE International Conference, 163–168. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Josephson , J. R. & Josephson , S. G. 1996. Abductive Inference: Computation, Philosophy, Technology. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kakas , A. C., Moraitis , P. & Spanoudakis , N. I. 2019. Gorgias: applying argumentation. Argument & Computation 10(1), 55–81.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kakas , A. & Michael , L. 2020. Abduction and argumentation for explainable machine learning: a position survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.12896.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kakas , A. & Moraitis , P. 2003. Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 883–890.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kakas , A. & Moraitis , P. 2006. Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation. In Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 384–391.
Google Scholar
|
|
Karafili , E., Kakas , A. C., Spanoudakis , N. I. & Lupu , E. C. 2017. Argumentation-based security for social good. In 2017 AAAI Fall Symposium Series.
Google Scholar
|
|
Karafili , E., Lupu , E. C., Arunkumar , S. & Bertino , E. n.d.. Policy analysis for drone systems: an argumentation-based approach.
Google Scholar
|
|
Karafili , E., Spanaki , K. & Lupu , E. C. 2018a. An argumentation reasoning approach for data processing. Computers in Industry 94, 52–61.
Google Scholar
|
|
Karafili , E., Wang , L., Kakas , A. C. & Lupu , E. 2018b. Helping forensic analysts to attribute cyber-attacks: an argumentation-based reasoner. In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, 510–518. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Karafili , E., Wang , L. & Lupu , E. C. 2020. An argumentation-based reasoner to assist digital investigation and attribution of cyber-attacks. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation 32, 300925.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kemke , C. 2006. An architectural framework for natural language interfaces to agent systems. In Computational Intelligence, 371–376.
Google Scholar
|
|
Keneni , B. M., Kaur , D., Al Bataineh , A., Devabhaktuni , V. K., Javaid , A. Y., Zaientz , J. D. & Marinier , R. P. 2019. Evolving rule-based explainable artificial intelligence for unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE Access 7, 17001–17016.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kobbe , J., Opitz , J., Becker , M., Hulpus , I., Stuckenschmidt , H. & Frank , A. 2019. Exploiting background knowledge for argumentative relation classification. In 2nd Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge (LDK 2019). Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kökciyan , N., Chapman , M., Balatsoukas , P., Sassoon , I., Essers , K., Ashworth , M., Curcin , V., Modgil , S., Parsons , S. & Sklar , E. I. 2019. A collaborative decision support tool for managing chronic conditions. In MedInfo, 644–648.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kokciyan , N., Sassoon , I., Young , A. P., Chapman , M., Porat , T., Ashworth , C., Modgil , S., Parsons , S. & Sklar , E. 2018. Towards an argumentation system for supporting patients in self-managing their chronic conditions. In AAAI.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kökciyan , N., Yaglikci , N. & Yolum , P. 2017. An argumentation approach for resolving privacy disputes in online social networks. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 17(3), 1–22.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kökciyan , N. & Yolum , P. 2017. Context-based reasoning on privacy in internet of things. In IJCAI, 4738–4744.
Google Scholar
|
|
Koshiyama , A., Kazim , E. & Engin , Z. 2019. Xai: digital ethics. In HeXAI Workshop.
Google Scholar
|
|
Kraus , S., Sycara , K. & Evenchik , A. 1998. Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104(1–2), 1–69.
Google Scholar
|
|
Labrie , N. & Schulz , P. J. 2014. Does argumentation matter? a systematic literature review on the role of argumentation in doctor–patient communication. Health Communication 29(10), 996–1008.
Google Scholar
|
|
Laird , J. E. & Nielsen , E. 1994. Coordinated behavior of computer generated forces in TacAir-Soar. AD-A280 063 1001, 57.
Google Scholar
|
|
Lamy , J.-B., Sekar , B., Guezennec , G., Bouaud , J. & Séroussi , B. 2019. Explainable artificial intelligence for breast cancer: a visual case-based reasoning approach. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 94, 42–53.
Google Scholar
|
|
Langley , P. 2019. Explainable, normative, and justified agency. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 33, 9775–9779.
Google Scholar
|
|
Lawrence , J. & Reed , C. 2020. Argument mining: a survey. Computational Linguistics 45(4), 765–818.
Google Scholar
|
|
Letia , I. A. & Groza , A. 2012. Interleaved argumentation and explanation in dialog. In The 12th workshop on Computational Models of Natural Argument, 44.
Google Scholar
|
|
Levin , J. A. & Moore , J. A. 1977. Dialogue-games: metacommunication structures for natural language interaction. Cognitive Science 1(4), 395–420.
Google Scholar
|
|
Liao , B., Anderson , M. & Anderson , S. L. 2018. Representation, justification and explanation in a value driven agent: an argumentation-based approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1812.05362.
Google Scholar
|
|
Lifschitz , V. 2019. Answer Set Programming. Springer International Publishing.
Google Scholar
|
|
Lippi , M. & Torroni , P. 2016. Argumentation mining: state of the art and emerging trends. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT) 16(2), 1–25.
Google Scholar
|
|
Liu , X., Eshghi , A., Swietojanski , P. & Rieser , V. 2019. Benchmarking natural language understanding services for building conversational agents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.05566.
Google Scholar
|
|
Lombrozo , T. 2006. The structure and function of explanations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10(10), 464–470.
Google Scholar
|
|
Longo , L. 2016. Argumentation for knowledge representation, conflict resolution, defeasible inference and its integration with machine learning. In Machine Learning for Health Informatics, 183–208. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Longo , L. & Hederman , L. 2013. Argumentation theory for decision support in health-care: a comparison with machine learning. In International Conference on Brain and Health Informatics, 168–180, Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Loui , R. P. & Norman , J. 1995. Rationales and argument moves. Artificial Intelligence and Law 3(3), 159–189.
Google Scholar
|
|
Lucero , M. J. G., Chesnevar , C. I. & Simari , G. R. 2009. On the accrual of arguments in defeasible logic programming. In Twenty-First International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Google Scholar
|
|
Luis-Argentina , S. 2008. Decision rules and arguments in defeasible decision making. In Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2008, 172, 171.
Google Scholar
|
|
Madhikermi , M., Malhi , A. K. & Främling , K. 2019. Explainable artificial intelligence based heat recycler fault detection in air handling unit. In International Workshop on Explainable, Transparent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 110–125. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Malle , B. F. 2006. How the Mind Explains Behavior: Folk Explanations, Meaning, and Social Interaction. MIT Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Mayer , T., Cabrio , E., Lippi , M., Torroni , P. & Villata , S. 2018. Argument mining on clinical trials. In COMMA, 137–148.
Google Scholar
|
|
McBurney , P. & Parsons , S. 2002. Dialogue games in multi-agent systems. Informal Logic 22(3).
Google Scholar
|
|
McBurney , P. & Parsons , S. 2009. Dialogue games for agent argumentation. In Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, 261–280, Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Mcburney , P., Van Eijk , R. M., Parsons , S. & Amgoud , L. 2003. A dialogue game protocol for agent purchase negotiations. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 7(3), 235–273.
Google Scholar
|
|
McCarty , L. T. 1976. Reflections on taxman: an experiment in artificial intelligence and legal reasoning. Harvard Law Review 90, 837.
Google Scholar
|
|
Meditskos , G., Kontopoulos , E., Vrochidis , S. & Kompatsiaris , I. 2019. Converness: ontology-driven conversational awareness and context understanding in multimodal dialogue systems. Expert Systems, e12378.
Google Scholar
|
|
Melo , V. S., Panisson , A. R. & Bordini , R. H. 2016. Argumentation-based reasoning using preferences over sources of information. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multiagent Systems, 1337–1338.
Google Scholar
|
|
Mercier , H. & Sperber , D. 2011. Why do Humans Reason? Arguments for an Argumentative Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Miller , T. 2019. Explanation in artificial intelligence: insights from the social sciences. Artificial Intelligence 267, 1–38.
Google Scholar
|
|
Modgil , S. 2006a. Hierarchical argumentation. In European Workshop on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, 319–332. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Modgil , S. 2006b. Value based argumentation in hierarchical argumentation frameworks. COMMA 144, 297–308.
Google Scholar
|
|
Modgil , S. 2009. Reasoning about preferences in argumentation frameworks. Artificial Intelligence 173(9–10), 901–934.
Google Scholar
|
|
Modgil , S., Budzynska , K. & Lawrence , J. 2018. Argument harvesting using chatbots. In Computational Models of Argument: Proceedings of COMMA 2018, 305, 149.
Google Scholar
|
|
Modgil , S. & Prakken , H. 2014. The aspic+ framework for structured argumentation: a tutorial. Argument & Computation 5(1), 31–62.
Google Scholar
|
|
Modgil , S., Toni , F., Bex , F., Bratko , I., Chesñevar , C. I., Dvořák , W., Falappa , M. A., Fan , X., Gaggl , S. A., García , A. J., González , M. P., Gordon , T. F., Leite , J., Možina , M., Reed , C., Simari , G. R., Szeider , S., Torroni , P. & Woltran , S. 2013. The added value of argumentation. In Agreement Technologies, 357–403. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Moens , M.-F. 2016. Argumentation mining: how can a machine acquire world and common sense knowledge?. In COMMA, 4.
Google Scholar
|
|
Moens , M.-F. 2018. Argumentation mining: how can a machine acquire common sense and world knowledge?. Argument & Computation 9(1), 1–14.
Google Scholar
|
|
Mollas , I., Bassiliades , N. & Tsoumakas , G. 2020. Altruist: argumentative explanations through local interpretations of predictive models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.07650.
Google Scholar
|
|
Mosca , F., Sarkadi , S., Such , J. M. & McBurney , P. 2020. Agent expri: licence to explain. In International Workshop on Explainable, Transparent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 21–38. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Možina , M., Žabkar , J. & Bratko , I. 2007. Argument based machine learning. Artificial Intelligence 171(10–15), 922–937.
Google Scholar
|
|
Murukannaiah , P. K., Kalia , A. K., Telangy , P. R. & Singh , M. P. 2015. Resolving goal conflicts via argumentation-based analysis of competing hypotheses. In 2015 IEEE 23rd International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE), 156–165. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Nicolaides , A. N., Kakkos , S. K., Kyriacou , E., Griffin , M., Sabetai , M., Thomas , D. J., Tegos , T., Geroulakos , G., Labropoulos , N., Doré , C. J., Morris , T. P., Naylor , R. & Abbott , A. L. 2010. Asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis and cerebrovascular risk stratification. Journal of Vascular Surgery 52(6), 1486–1496.
Google Scholar
|
|
Noël , V. & Kakas , A. 2009. Gorgias-c: extending argumentation with constraint solving. In International Conference on Logic Programming and Nonmonotonic Reasoning, 535–541. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Nunes , E., Kulkarni , N., Shakarian , P., Ruef , A. & Little , J. 2016a. Cyber-deception and attribution in capture-the-flag exercises. In Cyber Deception, 149–165. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Nunes , E., Shakarian , P. & Simari , G. I. 2016b. Toward argumentation-based cyber attribution. In 30th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 2016, 177–184. AI Access Foundation.
Google Scholar
|
|
Nunes , E., Shakarian , P., Simari , G. I. & Ruef , A. 2016c. Argumentation models for cyber attribution. In 2016 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 837–844. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Nute , D. 2001. Defeasible logic. In International Conference on Applications of Prolog, 151–169. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Oliveira , T., Dauphin , J., Satoh , K., Tsumoto , S. & Novais , P. 2018. Argumentation with goals for clinical decision support in multimorbidity. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems.
Google Scholar
|
|
Ott , M., Cardie , C. & Hancock , J. T. 2013. Negative deceptive opinion spam. In Proceedings of the 2013 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 497–501.
Google Scholar
|
|
Páez , A. 2019. The pragmatic turn in explainable artificial intelligence (xai). Minds and Machines 29(3), 441–459.
Google Scholar
|
|
Panisson , A. R. 2019. Towards an organisation-centred semantics for argumentation-based dialogues. In 2019 8th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), 491–496. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Panisson , A. R., Ali , A., McBurney , P. & Bordini , R. H. 2018. Argumentation schemes for data access control. In COMMA, 361–368.
Google Scholar
|
|
Panisson , A. R. & Bordini , R. H. 2016. Knowledge representation for argumentation in agent-oriented programming languages. In 2016 5th Brazilian Conference on Intelligent Systems (BRACIS), 13–18. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Panisson , A. R., Meneguzzi , F., Vieira , R. & Bordini , R. H. 2014. An approach for argumentation-based reasoning using defeasible logic in multi-agent programming languages. In 11th International Workshop on Argumentation in Multiagent Systems, 1–15.
Google Scholar
|
|
Panisson , A. R., Meneguzzi , F., Vieira , R. & Bordini , R. H. 2015. Towards practical argumentation-based dialogues in multi-agent systems. In 2015 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (WI-IAT), 2, 151–158. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Pavese , C. 2019. The semantics and pragmatics of argumentation. Academia.
Google Scholar
|
|
Pilotti , P., Casali , A. & Chesñevar , C. 2015. A belief revision approach for argumentation-based negotiation agents. International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science 25(3), 455–470.
Google Scholar
|
|
Pocevičiūtė , M., Eilertsen , G. & Lundström , C. 2020. Survey of XAI in digital pathology. In Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Digital Pathology, 56–88, Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Potash , P., Bhattacharya , R. & Rumshisky , A. 2017. Length, interchangeability, and external knowledge: observations from predicting argument convincingness. In Proceedings of the Eighth International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 342–351.
Google Scholar
|
|
Prakken , H. 2005a. Ai & law, logic and argument schemes. Argumentation 19(3), 303–320.
Google Scholar
|
|
Prakken , H. 2005b. Coherence and flexibility in dialogue games for argumentation. Journal of Logic and Computation 15(6), 1009–1040.
Google Scholar
|
|
Prakken , H. 2017. Logics of Argumentation and the Law. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Prakken , H. & Sartor , G. 1998. Modelling reasoning with precedents in a formal dialogue game. In Judicial Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 127–183. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Prakken , H., Wyner , A., Bench-Capon , T. & Atkinson , K. 2015. A formalization of argumentation schemes for legal case-based reasoning in aspic+. Journal of Logic and Computation 25(5), 1141–1166.
Google Scholar
|
|
Prentzas , N., Nicolaides , A., Kyriacou , E., Kakas , A. & Pattichis , C. 2019. Integrating machine learning with symbolic reasoning to build an explainable AI model for stroke prediction. In 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), 817–821. IEEE.
Google Scholar
|
|
Qurat-ul-ain Shaheen , A. T. & Bowles , J. K. 2020. Dialogue games for explaining medication choices. In Rules and Reasoning: 4th International Joint Conference, RuleML+ RR 2020, Oslo, Norway, June 29–July 1, 2020, Proceedings, 97. Springer Nature.
Google Scholar
|
|
Rago , A., Cocarascu , O. & Toni , F. 2018. Argumentation-based recommendations: fantastic explanations and how to find them. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Google Scholar
|
|
Rahwan , I., Banihashemi , B., Reed , C., Walton , D. & Abdallah , S. 2011. Representing and classifying arguments on the semantic web. The Knowledge Engineering Review 26(4), 487–511.
Google Scholar
|
|
Reed , C., Wells , S., Budzynska , K. & Devereux , J. 2010. Building arguments with argumentation: the role of illocutionary force in computational models of argument. In COMMA, 415–426.
Google Scholar
|
|
Regulation , P. 2016. Regulation (eu) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. REGULATION (EU), 679.
Google Scholar
|
|
Ripley , M. L. 2005. Arguing for the ethics of an ad: an application of multi-modal argumentation theory.
Google Scholar
|
|
Rissland , E. L. & Ashley , K. D. 1987. A case-based system for trade secrets law. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 60–66.
Google Scholar
|
|
Rosenfeld , A. & Kraus , S. 2016a. Providing arguments in discussions on the basis of the prediction of human argumentative behavior. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS), 6(4), 1–33.
Google Scholar
|
|
Rosenfeld , A. & Kraus , S. 2016b. Strategical argumentative agent for human persuasion. In Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 320–328. IOS Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Rowe , J., Levitt , K., Parsons , S., Sklar , E., Applebaum , A. & Jalal , S. 2012. Argumentation logic to assist in security administration. In Proceedings of the 2012 New Security Paradigms Workshop, 43–52.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sakama , C. 2018. Abduction in argumentation frameworks. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 28(2–3), 218–239.
Google Scholar
|
|
Samadi , M., Talukdar , P., Veloso , M. & Blum , M. 2016. Claimeval: integrated and flexible framework for claim evaluation using credibility of sources. In Thirtieth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Google Scholar
|
|
Samek , W. & Müller , K.-R. 2019. Towards explainable artificial intelligence. In Explainable AI: Interpreting, Explaining and Visualizing Deep Learning, 5–22. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Santini , F. & Yautsiukhin , A. 2015. Quantitative analysis of network security with abstract argumentation. In Data Privacy Management, and Security Assurance, 30–46. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sassoon , I., Kökciyan , N., Sklar , E. & Parsons , S. 2019. Explainable argumentation for wellness consultation. In International Workshop on Explainable, Transparent Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 186–202. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Schoenborn , J. M. & Althoff , K.-D. 2019. Recent trends in XAI: a broad overview on current approaches, methodologies and interactions. In ICCBR Workshops, 51–60.
Google Scholar
|
|
Schreier , M., Groeben , N. & Christmann , U. 1995. ‘that’s not fair! argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication. Argumentation 9(2), 267–289.
Google Scholar
|
|
Schulz , C. & Toni , F. 2016. Justifying answer sets using argumentation. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 16(1), 59–110.
Google Scholar
|
|
Šešelja , D. & Straßer, C. 2013. Abstract argumentation and explanation applied to scientific debates. Synthese 190(12), 2195–2217.
Google Scholar
|
|
Shakarian , P., Simari , G. I., Moores , G. & Parsons , S. 2015. Cyber attribution: an argumentation-based approach. In Cyber Warfare, 151–171. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sheh , R. K.-M. 2017. “Why did you do that?” explainable intelligent robots. In Workshops at the Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sklar , E. I. & Azhar , M. Q. 2015. Argumentation-based dialogue games for shared control in human-robot systems. Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 4(3), 120–148.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sklar , E. I. & Azhar , M. Q. 2018. Explanation through argumentation. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction, 277–285.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sklar , E. I., Parsons , S., Li , Z., Salvit , J., Perumal , S., Wall , H. & Mangels , J. 2016. Evaluation of a trust-modulated argumentation-based interactive decision-making tool. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 30(1), 136–173.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sklar , E., Parsons , S. & Singh , M. P. 2013. Towards an argumentation-based model of social interaction. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Argumentation in Multiagent Systems (ArgMAS) at the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS).
Google Scholar
|
|
Slugoski , B. R., Lalljee , M., Lamb , R. & Ginsburg , G. P. 1993. Attribution in conversational context: effect of mutual knowledge on explanation-giving. European Journal of Social Psychology 23(3), 219–238.
Google Scholar
|
|
Smullyan , R. M. 1995. First-Order Logic. Courier Corporation.
Google Scholar
|
|
Snaith , M., Lawrence , J. & Reed , C. 2010. Mixed initiative argument in public deliberation. Online Deliberation, 2.
Google Scholar
|
|
Sørmo , F., Cassens , J. & Aamodt , A. 2005. Explanation in case-based reasoning–perspectives and goals. Artificial Intelligence Review 24(2), 109–143.
Google Scholar
|
|
Spanoudakis , G., Kloukinas , C. & Androutsopoulos , K. 2007. Towards security monitoring patterns. In Proceedings of the 2007 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, 1518–1525.
Google Scholar
|
|
Spanoudakis , N. I., Constantinou , E., Koumi , A. & Kakas , A. C. 2017. Modeling data access legislation with gorgias. In International Conference on Industrial, Engineering and Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems, 317–327. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Spanoudakis , N. I., Kakas , A. C. & Moraitis , P. 2016a. Applications of argumentation: the soda methodology. In Proceedings of the Twenty-second European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 1722–1723.
Google Scholar
|
|
Spanoudakis , N. I., Kakas , A. C. & Moraitis , P. 2016b. Gorgias-b: argumentation in practice. In COMMA, 477–478.
Google Scholar
|
|
Spanoudakis , N. & Moriaitis , P. 2009. Engineering an agent-based system for product pricing automation. Engineering Intelligent Systems 17(2), 139.
Google Scholar
|
|
Swanson , R., Ecker , B. & Walker , M. 2015. Argument mining: extracting arguments from online dialogue. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Meeting of the Special Interest Group on Discourse and Dialogue, 217–226.
Google Scholar
|
|
Tang , Y., Cai , K., McBurney , P., Sklar , E. & Parsons , S. 2012. Using argumentation to reason about trust and belief. Journal of Logic and Computation 22(5), 979–1018.
Google Scholar
|
|
Tang , Y., Sklar , E. & Parsons , S. 2012. An argumentation engine: argtrust. In Ninth International Workshop on Argumentation in Multiagent Systems.
Google Scholar
|
|
Thimm , M. & Kersting , K. 2017. Towards argumentation-based classification. In Logical Foundations of Uncertainty and Machine Learning, Workshop at IJCAI, 17.
Google Scholar
|
|
Tjoa , E. & Guan , C. 2019. A survey on explainable artificial intelligence (XAI): towards medical XAI. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.07374.
Google Scholar
|
|
Torres , I., Hernández , N., Rodrguez , A., Fuentes , G. & Pineda , L. A. 2019. Reasoning with preferences in service robots. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems 36(5), 5105–5114.
Google Scholar
|
|
Toulmin , S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
|
|
Vassiliades , A., Patkos , T., Bikakis , A., Flouris , G., Bassiliades , N. & Plexousakis , D. 2020. Preliminary notions of arguments from commonsense knowledge. In 11th Hellenic Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 211–214.
Google Scholar
|
|
Verheij , B. 2003. Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 150(1–2), 291–324.
Google Scholar
|
|
Waltl , B. & Vogl , R. 2018. Explainable artificial intelligence the new frontier in legal informatics. Jusletter IT 4, 1–10.
Google Scholar
|
|
Walton , D. 2005. Argumentation Methods for Artificial Intelligence in Law. Springer Science & Business Media.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wanner , L., André , E., Blat , J., Dasiopoulou , S., Farrùs , M., Fraga , T., Kamateri , E., Lingenfelser , F., Llorach , G., Martínez , O., Meditskos , G., Mille , S., Minker , W., Pragst , L., Schiller , D., Stam , A., Stellingwerff , L., Sukno , F., Vieru , B. & Vrochidis , S. 2017. Kristina: a knowledge-based virtual conversation agent. In International Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 284–295. Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wardeh , M., Wyner , A., Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2013. Argumentation based tools for policy-making. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, 249–250.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wick , M. R. & Thompson , W. B. 1992. Reconstructive expert system explanation. Artificial Intelligence 54(1–2), 33–70.
Google Scholar
|
|
Willmott , S., Vreeswijk , G., Chesnevar , C., South , M., McGinnis , J., Modgil , S., Rahwan , I., Reed , C. & Simari , G. 2006. Towards an argument interchange format for multiagent systems. In 3rd International Workshop on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, ArgMAS-06, 17–34.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wooldridge , M. 2009. An Introduction to Multiagent Systems. John Wiley & Sons.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wooldridge , M. & Van Der Hoek , W. 2005. On obligations and normative ability: towards a logical analysis of the social contract. Journal of Applied Logic 3(3–4), 396–420.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wyner , A. Z., Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. 2012a. Model based critique of policy proposals. In International Conference on Electronic Participation, 120–131, Springer.
Google Scholar
|
|
Wyner , A. Z., Atkinson , K. & Bench-Capon , T. J. 2012b. Opinion gathering using a multi-agent systems approach to policy selection. In AAMAS, 1171–1172.
Google Scholar
|
|
Yang , S. C.-H. & Shafto , P. 2017. Explainable artificial intelligence via bayesian teaching. In NIPS 2017 Workshop on Teaching Machines, Robots, and Humans.
Google Scholar
|
|
Zeng , Z., Fan , X., Miao , C., Leung , C., Jih , C. J. & Soon , O. Y. 2018. Context-based and explainable decision making with argumentation. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems, 1114–1122. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
Google Scholar
|
|
Zeng , Z., Miao , C., Leung , C. & Chin , J. J. 2018. Building more explainable artificial intelligence with argumentation. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
Google Scholar
|
|
Zhang , S., Rudinger , R., Duh , K. & Van Durme , B. 2017. Ordinal common-sense inference. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 5, 379–395.
Google Scholar
|
|
Zhong , Q., Fan , X., Luo , X. & Toni , F. 2019. An explainable multi-attribute decision model based on argumentation. Expert Systems with Applications 117, 42–61.
Google Scholar
|
|
Zhong , Q., Fan , X., Toni , F. & Luo , X. 2014. Explaining best decisions via argumentation. In ECSI, 224–237.
Google Scholar
|
