Search
2023 Volume 8
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Neotypification of Muyocopron dipterocarpi, a new host record on Zanthoxylum fagara (Rutaceae) and the potential for secondary metabolite production in Muyocopronaceae

More Information
  • Muyocopron is a genus with a diverse lifestyle, occurring in tropical and temperate regions and can be found on various hosts and habitats. The present study confirmed a new host record of Muyocopron dipterocarpi from dead twigs of Zanthoxylum fagara in northern Thailand, based on both morphological comparisons with multigene analyses of LSU, SSU, ITS, and TEF1 sequence data. A preliminary screening test also showed that M. dipterocarpi has a potential for antimicrobial activity, observable as partial inhibition, when compared with a positive control. In addition, a neotype is designated here for Mu. dipterocarpi due to the original material no longer existing. This will facilitate subsequent taxonomic work in stabilizing the application of a name, and to serve as a foundation for further applied research of this species.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Liu JK, Ariyawansa H, Boehm E, et al. 2013. Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 63:1−313

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Crous PW, Luangsa-Ard JJ, Wingfield MJ, Carnegie AJ, Hernández-Restrepo M, et al. 2018. Fungal Planet description sheets: 785–867. Persoonia 41:238−417

    doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2018.41.12

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Hernández-Restrepo M, Bezerra JDP, Tan YP, Wiederhold N, Crous PW, et al. 2019. Re-evaluation of Mycoleptodiscus species and morphologically similar fungi. Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny and Evolution of Fungi 42:205−27

    doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2019.42.08

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, McKenzie EHC, et al. 2020. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 105:17−318

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00462-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Hyde KD, Dong Y, Phookamsak R, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, et al. 2020. Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 100:5−277

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Mapook A, Hyde KD, McKenzie EHC, Jones EBG, Bhat DJ, et al. 2020. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungi associated with the invasive weed Chromolaena odorata (Siam weed). Fungal Diversity 101:1−175

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00444-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Mapook A, Macabeo APG, Thongbai B, Hyde KD, Stadler M. 2020. Polyketide-derived secondary metabolites from a Dothideomycetes fungus, Pseudopalawania siamensis gen. et sp. nov., (Muyocopronales) with antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities. Biomolecules 10(4):569

    doi: 10.3390/biom10040569

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Andrioli WJ, Conti R, Araújo MJ, Zanasi R, Cavalcanti BC, et al. 2014. Mycoleptones A–C and polyketides from the endophyte Mycoleptodiscus indicus. Journal of Natural Products 77(1):70−78

    doi: 10.1021/np4006822

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Li C, Wang F, Wu X, Cao S. 2020. A new 24-homo-30-nor-cycloartane triterpenoid from a Hawaiian endophytic fungal strain. Tetrahedron Letters 61(7):151508

    doi: 10.1016/j.tetlet.2019.151508

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Nakashima KI, Tomida J, Tsuboi T, Kawamura Y, Inoue M. 2020. Muyocopronones A and B: Azaphilones from the endophytic fungus Muyocopron laterale. Beilstein Journal of Organic Chemistry 16:2100−7

    doi: 10.3762/bjoc.16.177

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Taylor JE, Hyde KD. 2003. Microfungi of tropical and temperate palms. Fungal Diversity Research Series 12:1−459

    Google Scholar

    [12]

    Mapook A, Hyde KD, Dai DQ, Li J, Jones EBG, et al. 2016. Muyocopronales, ord. nov., (Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) and a reappraisal of Muyocopron species from northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 265(3):225−37

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.265.3.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Lye P, Cheng J, Lum L, Chew KL, Teo J, et al. 2022. Muyocopron laterale: Invasive human infection of a plant pathogen in an immunocompromised host. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 28(10):1351−1352

    doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.01.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Index Fungorum. 2023. www.indexfungorum.org/names/Names.asp (Accessed on January 2023).

    [15]

    Species Fungorum. 2023. www.speciesfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (Accessed on January 2023).

    [16]

    Senanayake IC, Rathnayaka AR, Marasinghe DS, Calabon MS, Gentekaki E, et al. 2020. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11(1):2678−754

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    El-Desoukey RMA. 2018. Phytochemical and antimicrobial activity of Acacia Ehrenbergiana Hayne (Salam) as a grazing herb against some animal pathogens. Advances in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 6(6):246−51

    doi: 10.17582/journal.aavs/2018/6.6.246.251

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Balouiri M, Sadiki M, Ibnsouda SK. 2016. Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis 6(2):71−79

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.11.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172:4239−46

    doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    White T, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds. Innis M , Gelfand D, Shinsky J, White T. New York: Academic Press. pp. 315−22. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

    [21]

    Binder M, Hibbett D. 2003. Oligonucleotides. https://www2.clarku.edu/faculty/dhibbett/protocols_folder/primers/primers.pdf (Accessed on 25 April 2023)

    [22]

    Dissanayake AJ, Bhunjun CS, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Liu JK. 2020. Applied aspects of methods to infer phylogenetic relationships amongst fungi. Mycosphere 11(1):2652−76

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings of 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA, 14 November 2010. New Orleans, USA: IEEE. pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129

    [24]

    Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57:758−71

    doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312−13

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Rambaut A. 2009. FigTree v1.4: tree figure drawing tool. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/

    [27]

    Senwanna C, Hongsanan S, Phookamsak R, Tibpromma S, Cheewangkoon R, et al. 2019. Muyocopron heveae sp. nov. and M. dipterocarpi appears to have host-jumped to rubber. Mycological Progress 18:741−752

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-019-01484-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Huanraluek N, Jayawardena RS, Thambugala KM, Tian Q. 2020. New host records for three saprobic Dothideomycetes in Thailand. Asian Journal of Mycology 3(1):345−61

    doi: 10.5943/ajom/3/1/9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Jeewon R, et al. 2019. Diversity, morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes on decaying wild seed pods and fruits. Mycosphere 10(1):1−186

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Tennakoon DS, Kuo CH, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Thambugala KM, Gentekaki E, et al. 2021. Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to Celtis formosana, Ficus ampelas, F. septica, Macaranga tanarius and Morus australis leaf litter inhabiting microfungi. Fungal Diversity 108:1−215

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00474-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Chethana KWT, Niranjan M, Dong W, Samarakoon MC, Bao DF, et al. 2021. AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 101−150. Asian Journal of Mycology 4(1):113−260

    doi: 10.5943/ajom/4/1/8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Ariyawansa HA, Hawksworth DL, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Maharachchikumbura SSN, et al. 2014. Epitypification and neotypification: Guidelines with appropriate and inappropriate examples. Fungal Diversity 69:57−91

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0315-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Turland NJ, Wiersema JH, Barrie FR, Greuter W, Hawksworth DL, et al. (Eds.) 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code). The XIX International Botanical Congress (IBC), Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159. Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books. https://www.iapt-taxon.org/nomen/main.php

    [34]

    Chethana KWT, Jayawardena RS, Chen YJ, Konta S, Tibpromma S, et al. 2021. Appressorial interactions with host and their evolution. Fungal Diversity 110:75−107

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00487-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Konta S, Hongsanan S, Tibpromma S, Thongbai B, Maharachchikumbura SSN, et al. 2016. An advance in the endophyte story: Oxydothidaceae fam. nov. with six new species of Oxydothis. Mycosphere 7(9):1425−46

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/9/15

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Mapook A, Hyde KD. 2023. Neotypification of Muyocopron dipterocarpi, a new host record on Zanthoxylum fagara (Rutaceae) and the potential for secondary metabolite production in Muyocopronaceae. Studies in Fungi 8:9 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0009
    Mapook A, Hyde KD. 2023. Neotypification of Muyocopron dipterocarpi, a new host record on Zanthoxylum fagara (Rutaceae) and the potential for secondary metabolite production in Muyocopronaceae. Studies in Fungi 8:9 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0009

Figures(2)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(3585) PDF downloads(899)

Other Articles By Authors

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Neotypification of Muyocopron dipterocarpi, a new host record on Zanthoxylum fagara (Rutaceae) and the potential for secondary metabolite production in Muyocopronaceae

Studies in Fungi  8 Article number: 9  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Muyocopron is a genus with a diverse lifestyle, occurring in tropical and temperate regions and can be found on various hosts and habitats. The present study confirmed a new host record of Muyocopron dipterocarpi from dead twigs of Zanthoxylum fagara in northern Thailand, based on both morphological comparisons with multigene analyses of LSU, SSU, ITS, and TEF1 sequence data. A preliminary screening test also showed that M. dipterocarpi has a potential for antimicrobial activity, observable as partial inhibition, when compared with a positive control. In addition, a neotype is designated here for Mu. dipterocarpi due to the original material no longer existing. This will facilitate subsequent taxonomic work in stabilizing the application of a name, and to serve as a foundation for further applied research of this species.

    • Muyocopronaceae was validly introduced by Hyde et al.[1], with a type genus Muyocopron Speg. The family currently comprises nine genera (viz. Arxiella Papendorf, Leptodiscella Papendorf, Mycoleptodiscus Ostaz., Muyocopron Speg., Neocochlearomyces Pinruan, Sommai, Suetrong, J.Z. Groenew. & Crous, Neomycoleptodiscus Hern.-Restr., J.D.P. Bezerra & Crous, Paramycoleptodiscus Crous & M.J. Wingf., Pseudopalawania Mapook & K.D. Hyde, and Setoapiospora Mapook & K.D. Hyde), based on molecular phylogeny and morphology[27]. Interestingly, members of Muyocopronaceae have been reported to have the potential for antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities[710]. Pseudopalawania siamensis polyketide-derived secondary metabolite produced with the potential of antimicrobial and cytotoxic activities. This comprised a new heterodimeric bistetrahydroxanthone, namely pseudopalawanone[7]. An endophytic fungus, Muyocopron laterale (ECN279), which was isolated from a healthy leaf of Canavalia lineata (Fabaceae), produced two new azaphilones, namely muyocopronones A and B with weak antibacterial activity[10]. An endophytic species, Mycoleptodiscus indicus, which is currently named Muyocopron sahnii[3], produced a new triterpenoid[9] and three new azaphilones, namely mycoleptones A, B, and C with four known polyketides. All compounds were weakly active when tested in antileishmanial and cytotoxicity assays[8]. However, the study of secondary metabolite production from Muyocopronaceae is still in the initial stages.

      Muyocopron is a diverse genus which can be found in tropical and temperate regions, occurring as saprobes and pathogens on various plant parts such as dead aerial twigs, branches, stems and leaves and can also be an opportunistic pathogen on humans and animals[3, 1113]. A mycoleptodiscus-like asexual morph has been described for the genus with several additional species based on molecular analyses[3]. The asexual morphs are characterized by irregular sporodochium-like conidiomata, globose or broadly ellipsoidal to ampulliform with enteroblastic, monophialidic conidiogenous cells, and fusiform or fusoid-ellipsoid, curved, hyaline, aseptate or septate conidia with terminal and/or lateral appendages, with or without dark brown appressoria[3]. Presently, 68 species epithets are listed in Index Fungorum[14] with 56 probable species listed in Species Fungorum[15].

      In this study, we provide morphological descriptions and illustrations of a new collection of Mu. dipterocarpi from Zanthoxylum fagara, in northern Thailand. The identification was confirmed using both multigene analyses and morphological comparisons. The results of preliminary screening for antimicrobial activity is also provided. The lifestyle and function with the potential for secondary metabolites production are also discussed. In addition, a neotype is designated here for Mu. dipterocarpi due to the original material no longer existing.

    • Fresh material was collected from Phrae Province (India) in September 2016. The micromorphology was examined following the methodology as described by Mapook et al.[6]. Single spore isolation and culture morphology were obtained following the methods of Senanayake et al.[16]. Germinated spores were observed on MEA media (malt extract agar: 33.6 g/l sterile distilled water, Difco malt extract) within 24 h and transferred to new MEA media and incubated at room temperature (25 °C) in the dark. Pure cultures were used for molecular study and pre-screening tests for antimicrobial activity. The specimens with collection details and living cultures are deposited in the Herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University (Herb. MFLU) and Culture collection Mae Fah Luang University (MFLUCC), Chiang Rai, Thailand.

    • Preliminary screening of antimicrobial activity was carried out following Mapook et al.[6]. Antibacterial discs of penicillin and ciprofloxacin, with antifungal discs of nystatin were used as positive control for screening[17]. Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis, DSM10), Gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli, DSM498), and filamentous fungus (Mucor plumbeus, MUCL 49355) were determined by the zone of inhibition using agar plug diffusion method, compared with positive control[18].

    • DNA extraction, PCR amplification and sequencing were carried out following the methodology as described by Mapook et al.[6]. The partial large subunit nuclear rDNA (LSU) was amplified with primer pairs LROR and LR5[19]. The partial small subunit nuclear rDNA (SSU) was amplified with primer pairs NS1 and NS4[20]. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) was amplified by using primer pairs ITS5 and ITS4[20]. The translation elongation factor 1-α (TEF1) was amplified by using primers EF1-983F and EF1-2218R[21]. The PCR products were sent for sequencing at SeqLab GmbH (Microsynth AG), Göttingen, Germany.

    • Phylogenetic analysis was carried out following Mapook et al.[6] and Dissanayake et al.[22]. The closest relative strains were selected following Mapook et al.[6,7]. The combined aligned dataset was analyzed based on maximum likelihood (ML) and Bayesian inference (BI) via the CIPRES Science Gateway platform (V. 3.3, www.phylo.org)[23]. ML analysis was performed by RAxML-HPC2 on XSEDE (8.2.12) tool[24,25] using the GTR+I+G model of nucleotide substitution with 1,000 rapid bootstrap replicates. BI analysis was performed by using MrBayes on XSEDE (3.2.7a) tool with the GTR+I+G model. Six simultaneous Markov chains were performed for 5,000,000 generations, and trees were sampled every 1000th generation. Phylogenetic trees were drawn using FigTree 1.4.0[26] and edited by Microsoft Office PowerPoint 365 and Adobe Photoshop CS6. The sequences used for analyses with accession numbers are given in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Taxa used in this study and their GenBank accession numbers. New sequences are in bold.

      TaxaStrain no.1GenBank accession numbers2
      LSUSSUITSTEF1
      Acrospermum adeanumM133EU940104EU940031EU940180
      Acrospermum compressumM151EU940084EU940012EU940161
      Acrospermum gramineumM152EU940085EU940013EU940162
      Arxiella dolichandraeCBS 138853TKP004477KP004449
      Arxiella terrestrisCBS 268.65TMH870201MH858565
      Dyfrolomyces phetchaburiensisMFLUCC 15-0951TMF615402MF615403
      Dyfrolomyces rhizophoraeBCC15481KF160009
      Dyfrolomyces rhizophoraeJK 5456AGU479799GU479860
      Dyfrolomyces thailandicaMFLU 16-1173TKX611366KX611367
      Dyfrolomyces thamplaensisMFLUCC 15-0635TKX925435KX925436KY814763
      Dyfrolomyces tiomanensisNTOU3636TKC692156KC692155KC692157
      Leptodiscella africanaCBS 400.65TMH870275MH858635
      Leptodiscella brevicatenataFMR 10885TFR821311FR821312
      Leptodiscella chlamydosporaMUCL 28859FN869567FR745398
      Leptodiscella rinteliiCBS 144927TLR025181LR025180
      Lophium mytilinum AFTOL-ID 1609DQ678081DQ678030DQ677926
      Melomastia maolanensisGZCC 16-0102TKY111905KY111906KY814762
      Muyocopron alcorniiBRIP 43897TMK487708MK487735MK495956
      Muyocopron atromaculansMUCL 34983TMK487709MK487736MK495957
      Muyocopron castanopsisMFLUCC 10-0042JQ036225
      Muyocopron castanopsisMFLUCC 14-1108TKU726965KU726968MT137784MT136753
      Muyocopron chromolaenaeMFLUCC 17-1513TMT137876MT137881MT137777MT136756
      Muyocopron chromolaenicolaMFLUCC 17-1470TMT137877MT137882MT137778MT136757
      Muyocopron coloratumCBS 720.95TMK487710NR_160197MK495958
      Muyocopron dipterocarpiMFLU 18-2582MW079363MW063196
      Muyocopron dipterocarpiMFLUCC 14-1103TKU726966KU726969MT137785MT136754
      Muyocopron dipterocarpiMFLUCC 17-0075MH986833MH986829MH986837
      Muyocopron dipterocarpiMFLUCC 17-0354MH986834MH986830MH986838
      Muyocopron dipterocarpiMFLUCC 17-0356MH986835MH986831MH986839
      Muyocopron dipterocarpiMFLUCC 17-1464NTOQ861270OQ861267OQ832759OQ856779
      Muyocopron dipterocarpiMFLUCC 18-0470MK348001MK347890MK347783
      Muyocopron garethjonesiiMFLU 16-2664TKY070274KY070275
      Muyocopron geniculatumCBS 721.95TMK487711MK487737MK495959
      Muyocopron heveaeMFLUCC 17-0066TMH986832MH986828MH986836
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 127677MK487718MK487744MK495965
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 141029TMK487712MK487738MK495960
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 141033MK487715MK487741MK495963
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145309MK487722MK487748MK495969
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145310MK487719MK487745MK495966
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145311MK487724MK487750
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145312MK487725MK487751MK495971
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145313MK487721MK487747MK495968
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145314MK487723MK487749MK495970
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145315MK487720MK487746MK495967
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 145316MK487726MK487752MK495972
      Muyocopron lateraleCBS 719.95MK487714MK487740MK495962
      Muyocopron lateraleFMR 13797MK874616MK874615MK875803
      Muyocopron lateraleIMI 324533MK487713MK487739MK495961
      Muyocopron lateraleURM 7801MK487717MK487743
      Muyocopron lateraleURM 7802MK487716MK487742MK495964
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMK447738MK447740
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLU 18-2087MK347930MK347821MK347716
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLU 18-2088MK347931MK347822MK347717
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLUCC 10-0041JQ036230JQ036226
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLUCC 14-1106TKU726967KU726970MT137786MT136755
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLUCC 16-0962MK348034MK347923
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLUCC 17-1465MT137878MT137883MT137779MT136758
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLUCC 17-1466MT137879MT137884MT137780MT136759
      Muyocopron lithocarpiMFLUCC 17-1500MT137880MT137885MT137781MT136760
      Muyocopron zamiaeCBS 203.71TMK487727MK495973
      Mycoleptodiscus endophyticaMFLUCC 17-0545TMG646946MG646978MG646961MG646985
      Mycoleptodiscus suttoniiCBS 141030MK487729MK495975
      Mycoleptodiscus suttoniiCBS 276.72TMK487728MK487753MK495974
      Mycoleptodiscus terrestrisCBS 231.53TMK487730MK487754MK495976
      Mycoleptodiscus terrestrisIMI 159038MK487731MK487755MK495977
      Mytilinidion rhenanumCBS 135.34FJ161175FJ161136FJ161092
      Neocochlearomyces chromolaenaeBCC 68250TMK047514MK047552MK047464MK047573
      Neocochlearomyces chromolaenaeBCC 68251MK047515MK047553MK047465MK047574
      Neocochlearomyces chromolaenaeBCC 68252MK047516MK047554MK047466MK047575
      Neomycoleptodiscus venezuelenseCBS 100519TMK487732MK487756MK495978
      Palawania thailandensisMFLU 16-1871KY086494MT137788
      Palawania thailandensisMFLUCC 14-1121TKY086493KY086495MT137787
      Paramycoleptodiscus albizziaeCBS 141320KX228330KX228279MK495979
      Paramycoleptodiscus albizziaeCPC 27552TMH878220
      Pseudopalawania siamensisMFLUCC 17-1476aTMT137789MT137782MT136752
      Pseudopalawania siamensisMFLUCC 17-1476bMT137790MT137783
      Setoapiospora thailandicaMFLUCC 17-1426TMN638847MN638851MN638862MN648731
      1 AFTOL-ID: Assembling the Fungal Tree of Life; BCC: BIOTEC Culture Collection; BRIP: Biosecurity Queensland Plant Pathology Herbarium, Brisbane, Australia; CBS: Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands; CPC: Culture collection of Pedro Crous, the Netherlands; FMR: Facultad de Medicina, Reus, Tarragona, Spain; GZCC: Guizhou Culture Collection; IMI: The International Mycological Institute Culture Collections; JK: J. Kohlmeyer; MFLU: the Herbarium of Mae Fah Luang University; MFLUCC: Mae Fah Luang University Culture Collection, Chiang Rai, Thailand; MUCL: Belgian Coordinated Collections of Microorganisms; URM: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco; T: ex-type isolates; NT: Neotype.
      2 LSU: 28S large subunit of the nrRNA gene; SSU: 18S small subunit of the nrRNA gene; ITS: internal transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 including 5.8S nrRNA gene; TEF1: partial translation elongation factor 1-α gene.
    • Seventy-seven strains are included in the combined dataset of LSU, SSU, ITS, and TEF1 sequence data, including our strain (MFLUCC 17-1464), which comprise 3969 characters with gaps. Tree topology of the ML analysis was similar to the BYPP. A best scoring RAxML tree with a final likelihood value of −25,539.739638 is presented in Fig. 1. The matrix had 1738 distinct alignment patterns, with 49.64% of undetermined characters or gaps. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.237294, C = 0.253374, G = 0.287766, T = 0.221566; substitution rates: AC = 1.187676, AG = 2.326266, AT = 1.446900, CG = 1.082572, CT = 5.256850, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.309869. The phylogram generated from ML analysis (Fig. 1) shows that our strain grouped within Muyocopron dipterocarpi clade. In a BLASTn search of NCBI GenBank, the closest match of the LSU, ITS, and TEF1 sequence of MFLUCC 17-1464 is Mu. dipterocarpi with 100% similarity to the strain MFLUCC 14-1103 (ex-holotype), while the closest match of the SSU sequence was identical with 99.90% similarity to Mu. dipterocarpi (strain MFLUCC 14-1103).

      Figure 1. 

      Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on combined dataset of LSU, SSU, ITS, and TEF1 sequence data. Bootstrap support values for maximum likelihood (ML) equal to or greater than 60% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) equal to or greater than 0.97 are given above the nodes. Newly generated sequences are in dark red bold and ex-type isolates are in bold. Lophium mytilinum (AFTOL-ID 1609) and Mytilinidion rhenanum (CBS 135.45) are used as outgroup taxa.

    • Muyocopron dipterocarpi Mapook, Doilom, Boonmee & K.D. Hyde, Phytotaxa 265(3): 232 (2016)

      Index Fungorum number: IF551617, Facesoffungi number: FoF 01889; Fig. 2

      Figure 2. 

      Muyocopron dipterocarpi (neotype). (a), (b) Superficial ascomata on substrate. (c), (d) Squash mounts showing ascomata walls. (e) Section of ascoma. (f) Peridium. (g) Pseudoparaphyses. (h)−(k). Asci. (l)−(p) Unicellular ascospores. (q) Culture characteristic on MEA. Scale bars: a = 1,000 µm, b = 500 µm, c = 100 µm, e = 50 µm, f, h−k = 20 µm, d, l−p = 10 µm, g = 5 µm.

      Saprobic on dead twigs of Zanthoxylum fagara (L.) Sarg. Sexual morph: Ascomata (65–)80–110 µm high × (230–)340–395 µm diam. ($\overline{\chi} $ = 92 × 332 µm, n = 10), superficial, coriaceous, solitary or scattered, appearing as circular, scattered, flattened, brown to dark brown spots, covering the host, without a subiculum, with a poorly developed basal layer and an irregular margin. Ostiole central. Peridium 15–25 µm wide, widest at the sides, outer layer comprising dark brown to black pseudoparenchymatous, occluded cells of textura angularis, inner layer comprising light brown cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium comprising 1–1.5 µm wide, cylindrical to filiform, septate, pseudoparaphyses. Asci 55–75 × 20–30 µm ($\overline {\chi} $ = 64 × 23.5 µm, n = 15), 8-spored, bitunicate, saccate or broadly obpyriform, pedicellate, straight or slightly curved, with a small ocular chamber. Ascospores 14–20 × 8.5–10 µm ($\overline {\chi} $ = 17 × 9.5 µm, n = 25), irregularly arranged, overlapping in the ascus, hyaline, oval or ellipsoid to obovoid with obtuse ends, aseptate, with granular appearance. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

      Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinating on MEA within 24 hr at room temperature and germ tubes produced from the ends of the ascospore. Colonies on MEA irregular, initially aerial mycelium white, slightly raised, filiform, becoming light brown from the center, flattened on surface, pale brown to light brown in reverse from the center of the colony with white margin.

      Pre-screening for antimicrobial activity: Muyocopron dipterocarpi (MFLUCC 14-1103, ex-holotype) showed antimicrobial activity against Bacillus subtilis and Escherichia coli (11 and 10 mm inhibition zone, respectively), observable as partial inhibition, when compared with the positive control (26 and 9 mm, respectively), but no inhibition of Mucor plumbeus; Mu. dipterocarpi (MFLUCC 17-1464) showed antimicrobial activity against M. plumbeus, B. subtilis and E. coli (11, 8, and 10 mm inhibition zone, respectively), observable as partial inhibition, when compared with the positive control (17, 26 , and 9 mm, respectively).

      Known hosts and distribution: On dried twigs of Dipterocarpus tuberculatus (Dipterocarpaceae) in Chiang Rai Province, Thailand[12]; on dried twig of Hevea brasiliensis (Euphorbiaceae) in Phayao Province, Thailand[27]; on dead twigs of Mangifera indica (Anacardiaceae) in Sukhothai Province, Thailand[28]; on decaying pod septum of Delonix regia (Fabaceae) in Phrae Province, Thailand[29]; on dead leaves and decaying twig of Celtis formosana (Cannabaceae) in Taiwan[30, 31].

      Material examined: THAILAND, Phrae Province, on dead twigs of Zanthoxylum fagara (Rutaceae), 22 September 2016, A. Mapook, (DPKP1, MFLU 23-0072, neotype designated here), ex-neotype culture MFLUCC 17-1464.

      Note: We identify our isolate (MFLUCC 17-1464) as Mu. dipterocarpi, based on phylogenetic analyses, together with morphological comparison. However, our isolate was found on different host families as compared with other previously reported strains. Therefore, the isolate is introduced here as a new host record on Zanthoxylum fagara from Thailand.

      During this study, we tried to examine the original collection of this species. Unfortunately, the type material of Mu. dipterocarpi could not be located in the MFLU fungarium, where the holotype specimen was deposited with a code number MFLU 15–1132[12]. A neotype for Mu. dipterocarpi is, therefore, needed to facilitate subsequent taxonomic work in stabilizing the application of name, and to serve as a foundation for further applied research of this species. Although the species have been reported from various hosts and is mostly distributed in Asia, especially in Thailand[6,12,2729], there are no collections from the same locality as indicated in the protologue. Neotypes from different locations may also be considered as long as the author are confident that they are conspecific[32]. Therefore, a neotype specimen is designated here for Mu. dipterocarpi due to the original material no longer existing, and in accordance with Art. 9.16[33]. This specimen is recent and well-preserved, and has typical morphology suitable to the description given in the protologue, completed with illustrations, molecular data and additional evidence of a potential for antimicrobial activity based on a preliminary screening.

    • Muyocopron species can be saprobic, endophytic, or pathogenic on various hosts with an ability to produce specialized infection structures such as appressoria from germinating ascospores and therefore probably has an endophytic lifestyle[3,27,34]. Muyocopron dipterocarpi is mostly reported from northern Thailand and probably not specific to the host, due to the species have been reported on a variety of plant families such as Anacardiaceae, Dipterocarpaceae, Euphorbiaceae, and Fabaceae[6,12,2729]. The species have not been reported to form any specialized infection structures from the other hosts, as well as our strain in this study except the first isolate from a dried twig of Hevea brasiliensis (Euphorbiaceae), which was assumed to have endophytic lifestyle[12,2731,34,35]. This suggests that Muyocopron species may have the ability to be endophytic or pathogenic and probably not specific to any hosts due to the genus reported on various hosts. Although fungi have the ability to change their lifestyle which can be exhibited in more than one lifestyle in a different host, the mechanism of appressoria production and the ecological lifestyle of Muyocopron is not well understood. In addition, Mu. dipterocarpi also has potential for antimicrobial activity against the tested organism based on a preliminary screening in this study.

      • Ausana Mapook would like to thank the Mae Fah Luang University Fund (Grant No. 651A16029), entitled 'Taxonomy, phylogeny, risk assessment, and potential impact of fungi on Siam weed in northern Thailand'. Kevin D. Hyde thanks the Basic Research Fund 2022 (Grant No. 652A01001), entitled 'Studies of fungi associated with Asteraceae and the discovery of biological properties', Princess Srinagarindra's Centenary Celebrations Foundation (Grant No. 64316001), and National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT) grant, entitled 'Total fungal diversity in a given forest area with implications towards species numbers, chemical diversity and biotechnology' (Grant No. N42A650547).

      • Kevin D. Hyde is the Editorial Board members of Journal Studies in Fungi. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research groups.

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (1) References (35)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Mapook A, Hyde KD. 2023. Neotypification of Muyocopron dipterocarpi, a new host record on Zanthoxylum fagara (Rutaceae) and the potential for secondary metabolite production in Muyocopronaceae. Studies in Fungi 8:9 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0009
    Mapook A, Hyde KD. 2023. Neotypification of Muyocopron dipterocarpi, a new host record on Zanthoxylum fagara (Rutaceae) and the potential for secondary metabolite production in Muyocopronaceae. Studies in Fungi 8:9 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2023-0009

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return