MINI REVIEW   Open Access    

Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers: a sustainable solution for tropical agriculture

More Information
  • Received: 16 November 2024
    Revised: 27 December 2024
    Accepted: 07 January 2025
    Published online: 19 March 2025
    Tropical Plants  4 Article number: e008 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • BB-CRFs offer a sustainable alternative to conventional fertilizers, minimizing nutrient loss and environmental impact in tropical agriculture.

    BB-CRFs improve nutrient delivery to tropical crops, optimizing plant growth and yield while promoting soil health.

    Significant market potential exists for BB-CRFs driven by consumer demand and policy support, but addressing global disparities in development is crucial.

    Future research should focus on developing cost-effective coatings, advancing controlled-release technologies, and promoting wider adoption in developing regions.

    BB-CRFs offer a promising pathway towards sustainable intensification of agriculture in the tropics, but further research and targeted policies are needed to fully realize their potential.

  • Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers (BB-CRFs) offer a sustainable solution for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and minimizing the environmental footprint of agriculture, particularly in tropical regions. Utilizing biodegradable coatings derived from renewable resources like lignin and starch, BB-CRFs address challenges specific to tropical agriculture, including nutrient leaching due to heavy rainfall and nitrogen volatilization from high temperatures. While developed nations benefit from advanced research and supportive policies driving BB-CRFs adoption, developing tropical regions face challenges related to production costs, technology access, and market awareness. Realizing the full potential of BB-CRFs for tropical plants requires collaborative efforts focused on developing cost-effective, high-performing bio-based coatings tailored to tropical conditions, advancing intelligent controlled-release technologies suited to the needs of specific tropical crops, fostering international collaboration for knowledge and technology transfer, and implementing supportive policies and educational programs to promote wider adoption in these regions. This is crucial for optimizing nutrition for diverse tropical crops like rice, banana, oil palm, coffee, and cocoa, ultimately contributing to increased productivity and environmental sustainability in these sensitive ecosystems.
    Graphical Abstract
  • The increasing global demand for food security and the necessity for environmental conservation have collectively driven the adoption of sustainable and low-carbon agricultural practices[1,2]. This urgency is particularly acute in tropical regions, which face unique challenges related to climate, soil properties, and socioeconomic factors. These regions are often characterized by intense rainfall leading to nutrient leaching, high temperatures causing nitrogen volatilization, and fragile ecosystems vulnerable to environmental degradation. Furthermore, many tropical countries are developing economies with limited resources for agricultural inputs and infrastructure. Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers (BB-CRFs) emerge as a promising technology to address these challenges, offering a potential pathway toward more sustainable and resilient agricultural systems.

    Although traditional fertilizers have played an important role in enhancing crop productivity, a series of environmental issues have also been triggered through their application, including soil degradation[3], greenhouse gas emissions[4], and water pollution[5]. These issues are often exacerbated in tropical regions due to intense rainfall, high temperatures, and sensitive ecosystems. For instance, heavy rainfall in Southeast Asia often leads to substantial nitrogen runoff from rice paddies, polluting waterways, and contributing to eutrophication[6]. Similarly, high temperatures in sub-Saharan Africa can accelerate nitrogen volatilization from urea-based fertilizers, reducing fertilizer efficiency, and increasing greenhouse gas emissions[7]. To address these challenges, BB-CRFs have emerged as a promising solution, offering a transformative approach to achieving the vision of a green and low-carbon agricultural landscape[8,9]. The encapsulation of nutrients within biodegradable coatings facilitates the gradual release of essential elements, thereby enhancing the efficiency of nutrient utilization[10], mitigating environmental pollution[11], promoting soil health[12], and fostering carbon sequestration[13]. These factors collectively contribute to the growth of green carbon sinks and enhance the resilience of tropical agroecosystems. Moreover, the reduced need for frequent fertilizer applications can offer economic benefits to tropical farmers.

    BB-CRFs represent a pivotal innovation in the agricultural fertilizer industry, demonstrating enormous market potential, particularly in tropical regions. As the global pursuit of sustainable agricultural practices and green carbon sequestration intensifies, BB-CRFs have garnered considerable attention due to their environmentally benign nature and capacity to augment fertilizer efficiency[14,15]. In contrast to their conventional chemical-coated counterparts, BB-CRFs created using naturally degradable materials can ensure controlled nutrient release while minimizing potential risks to soil and environmental integrity[16]. This positions BB-CRFs as a holistic solution that harmonizes increased crop yield with environmental stewardship, crucial for the long-term sustainability of tropical agriculture.

    Although the potential of BB-CRFs is recognized globally, there are significant differences in developmental trajectories, technological advancements, market acceptance, and policy support across different regions[17]. This is particularly evident when comparing developed nations with tropical developing countries. This underscores the need for collaborative efforts from governments, research institutions, and enterprises to propel the advancement of BB-CRFs, specifically tailored for tropical applications. Therefore, to improve the performance of BB-CRFs in tropical contexts, reduce production costs, and expand their adoption rate amongst tropical farmers, governments, and international organizations should strengthen research investment targeted at tropical needs, improve policy frameworks that incentivize sustainable agriculture in these regions, and enhance international cooperation focusing on technology transfer and capacity building. BB-CRFs hold considerable promise for advancing sustainable intensification in tropical agriculture by improving nutrient use efficiency, reducing environmental impacts, and supporting the livelihoods of farmers.

    Bio-based materials, derived from renewable biomass resources such as lignin[18], straw[19], vegetable oils[20], and starch[21], offer a compelling alternative to conventional petroleum-based coatings. These materials are inherently biodegradable and environmentally compatible, thereby contributing to the development of a more sustainable agricultural model. The advantages of bio-based materials over traditional counterparts are numerous and diverse (Fig. 1a).

    Figure 1.  (a) Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers (BB-CRFs) vs traditional coated controlled-release fertilizer. (b) The gap in BB-CRFs development between developed and developing countries. (c) Bio-based coating materials from enterprises in different countries.

    BB-CRFs offer multiple advantages for soil and environmental health beyond their inherent biodegradability. The controlled-release mechanism significantly enhances nutrient use efficiency compared to conventional fertilizers, reducing the need for high application rates and thus minimizing the risk of nutrient pollution. For instance, Chen et al.[8] found that lignin/paraffin/epoxy resin composite-coated urea increased nitrogen use efficiency by 33% in lettuce. Similarly, Weng et al.[22] reported a 71.75% increase in rice yield with starch/PBAT composite film-packaged fertilizers, attributed to enhanced nutrient release longevity (20–100 days) and reduced water vapor transmission. These improvements stem from the utilization of renewable biomass resources, which decreases dependence on finite fossil fuels[23], promoting resource security and lowering the carbon footprint of fertilizer production. The biodegradability of these coatings ensures their decomposition by soil microorganisms, preventing the accumulation of non-biodegradable waste and enriching the soil with organic matter. This, in turn, improves carbon sequestration, reduces carbon emissions[24,25], and fosters a thriving soil ecosystem by promoting positive interactions with soil microorganisms[26]. Importantly, bio-based coating materials are generally non-toxic and safe for crops and the environment, posing no threat to food safety[27]. Their tunable properties, including hydrophobicity and degradation rate, can be adjusted to meet specific crop and soil requirements, ensuring optimal and synchronized nutrient release[28].

    While bio-based coatings represent a more sustainable alternative to conventional polymers, their long-term environmental impacts require further investigation. Although biodegradable, the decomposition process and coating properties warrant careful scrutiny. Potential concerns include the release of intermediate byproducts during degradation, which could have unforeseen ecotoxicological effects on soil organisms, water quality, or non-target plants[29]. For instance, certain polysaccharides might release organic acids, temporarily altering soil pH[30]. Under anaerobic conditions common in some tropical soils, decomposition could produce methane, a potent greenhouse gas[31]. Additionally, the introduction of these coatings could alter the soil microbiome, with potential consequences for nutrient cycling and soil health. Finally, the production of bio-based materials, though renewable, requires resources and necessitates life cycle assessments to evaluate their true environmental footprint compared to conventional alternatives.

    Mitigating these potential risks requires further research focusing on toxicity studies of coatings and their degradation products, optimized coating design to minimize harmful byproducts and enhance biodegradability, and comprehensive life cycle assessments. This research will contribute to a more complete understanding of the environmental implications of bio-based coatings and guide the responsible development and implementation of BB-CRFs technology. Specifically, studies investigating the effects of various coatings on microbial diversity, nutrient cycling, and soil structure are needed. Furthermore, research into tailoring coating composition and degradation rates to match specific soil conditions and cropping systems will be crucial for maximizing benefits and minimizing potential negative impacts.

    Tropical agriculture presents unique challenges and opportunities for the implementation of innovative fertilizer technologies such as BB-CRFs[32]. The distinct climatic conditions, soil properties, and cropping systems of tropical regions require tailored approaches to nutrient management[33]. BB-CRFs offer several advantages that are specifically suited to the needs of tropical agriculture.

    A key benefit is the ability of BB-CRFs to mitigate nutrient losses, a major concern in tropical environments. Heavy rainfall can cause significant leaching of essential nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium, reducing the effectiveness of fertilizer and contributing to water pollution[34]. The controlled-release mechanism of BB-CRFs minimizes these losses by providing nutrients gradually, synchronized with crop demand. This leads to improved nutrient use efficiency and reduced environmental impact, which are essential for sustainable agriculture in tropical regions.

    Furthermore, high temperatures in tropical climates can accelerate the volatilization of nitrogenous fertilizers, resulting in further nutrient loss and air pollution[35]. The protective coating of BB-CRFs helps reduce nitrogen volatilization, preserving valuable nutrients, and minimizing environmental damage.

    The diverse range of tropical crops often exhibit specific nutrient requirements at different growth stages[36]. BB-CRFs can be formulated with specific nutrient combinations and coatings that are tailored to match the unique requirements of individual tropical crops. This targeted approach optimizes the uptake of nutrients and promotes healthy plant growth, which in turn leads to improved yields and quality.

    In addition to their role in nutrient delivery, BB-CRFs contribute to the overall health of tropical agroecosystems[37,38]. The degradation of bio-based coatings results in the addition of organic matter to the soil, which in turn improves soil structure, water retention, and microbial activity. This has the effect of enhancing soil fertility and resilience, thereby rendering tropical cropping systems more sustainable and less vulnerable to environmental stresses such as drought and erosion[39]. The enhancement of soil health is a crucial element in ensuring the long-term productivity and ecological integrity of tropical agricultural landscapes.

    The potential of BB-CRFs applications in tropical crops is illustrated by specific examples. In rice cultivation, BB-CRFs enhances nitrogen use efficiency in flooded conditions[40,41]. In banana plantations, it supports robust growth and improves fruit quality[42]. For Mangifera indica L., it optimizes nutrient supply for sustained yields[43]. In sugarcane farming, it enhances nutrient uptake for improved sugarcane quality and yield[44]. These targeted applications showcase the versatility and effectiveness of BB-CRFs in diverse tropical cropping systems.

    Beyond improvements in yield and quality, BB-CRFs hold potential for enhancing the resilience of tropical crops to stresses like drought and pests/diseases. While anecdotal evidence and indirect findings suggest potential benefits in these areas, dedicated research exploring the underlying mechanisms is currently limited. For instance, the improved soil structure resulting from the degradation of bio-based coatings could enhance water retention and drought resistance[18], but direct studies on drought tolerance in tropical crops using BB-CRFs are lacking. Similarly, the influence of BB-CRFs on the soil microbiome may contribute to improved disease suppression, but further research is needed to investigate these interactions specifically in relation to pest and disease resistance in tropical crops.

    Several factors are converging to create a strong market for BB-CRFs. Consumers are increasingly conscious of the environmental impact of their choices, driving demand for sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives across sectors, including agriculture[45]. This shift in consumer preference aligns with government initiatives worldwide implementing policies and incentives to encourage sustainable agricultural practices, including the use of environmentally friendly fertilizers such as BB-CRFs[46]. There is an urgent need for sustainable agricultural intensification to meet the food demands of a growing global population while minimizing environmental impact, which creates a mature environment for the adoption of BB-CRFs[47]. In addition, the advancement of material science and production processes has resulted in a gradual decline in the cost of BB-CRFs, thereby making them highly competitive in the market[48]. The integration of big data analytics and intelligent technologies into agricultural practices can more accurately and efficiently manage BB-CRFs, thereby enhancing their market potential[49].

    To fully capitalize on the market potential of BB-CRFs, it is essential that there be strategic collaboration among research institutions, industry stakeholders, and policymakers. The establishment of robust research platforms that foster collaboration between agricultural universities, research institutions, and private companies will facilitate continuous innovation in materials and technologies[50]. The government plays a key role in this endeavor by providing policy guidance, allocating financial support through tax incentives and green credit schemes, and facilitating knowledge transfer to reduce investment risks and encourage private sector participation.

    Demonstration trials and farmer education programs are crucial for showcasing the benefits of BB-CRFs, such as increased yields, reduced fertilizer input, and improved crop quality, while also increasing farmers' understanding of the technology[51]. Enterprises should collaborate with distributors, agricultural cooperatives, and service providers can streamline distribution channels, ensuring that BB-CRFs reach farmers efficiently. Furthermore, innovative business models such as the sharing economy and digital platforms for agricultural investment can facilitate the accelerated dissemination of BB-CRFs[52].

    By closely monitoring market trends and based on user feedback, BB-CRFs manufacturers quickly respond to improve their products and expand into new niche markets. The distinctive combination of environmental sustainability and high efficiency inherent in BB-CRFs can bring transformative opportunities to the fertilizer industry.

    Understanding the specific needs and preferences of different consumer segments is crucial for developing effective marketing strategies. While comprehensive market research data on BB-CRFs adoption is currently limited, we can offer some preliminary insights. Organic agricultural producers, driven by principles of sustainability and natural inputs, may be particularly receptive to BB-CRFs; however, cost considerations and the availability of certified organic BB-CRFs could influence adoption rates. Adoption among conventional farmers will likely hinge on demonstrable economic benefits, such as increased yields, reduced fertilizer inputs, and labor savings, as well as practical considerations like ease of application. Large-scale agribusinesses may be motivated by the potential of BB-CRFs to improve sustainability performance, meet corporate social responsibility goals, and enhance brand image; scalability of production and consistent product quality will be key factors for this segment. Robust market research is essential to validate these assumptions and refine marketing strategies. Key research areas include consumer surveys to assess awareness and willingness to adopt BB-CRFs, price sensitivity analysis to determine optimal pricing, and distribution channel analysis to evaluate effective outreach strategies.

    There are notable discrepancies in the advancement and implementation of BB-CRFs between developed and developing countries (Fig. 1b). Developed countries, particularly in Europe and North America, have made significant investments in bio-based coating technologies, driven by a strong emphasis on environmental sustainability and the reduction of reliance on traditional plastics in agriculture[53]. In contrast, while developing countries, including China, have begun to embrace bio-based materials, their progress is relatively nascent, hindered by challenges related to production costs, technological capabilities, and market awareness[54].

    Developed countries have made significant progress in developing various bio-based coating materials based on their advanced capabilities in materials science, industrial technology, and biotechnology (Fig. 1c). These materials range from conventional options such as starch and polylactic acid (PLA) to novel biopolymers and synthetic biology products such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), polybutylene succinate (PBS), and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET)[55]. Many of these materials have been successfully commercialized for various agricultural applications. Although China has made remarkable progress in bio-based materials research, there is still a gap in the development and commercialization of novel materials. However, research institutions and companies are actively investing in China to bridge this gap, with a particular focus on improving materials performance and cost efficiency.

    The demand for bio-based materials in developed markets is driven by stringent regulations and consumer preferences. The legislative measures to restrict the use of plastics and promote biodegradable products, coupled with a high level of environmental awareness among consumers willing to pay a premium for eco-friendly options, have created a favorable market environment for BB-CRFs in these regions. In contrast, despite the implementation of environmental policies and initiatives in China, including the plastic ban, practical challenges of enforcement and the price sensitivity of the market pose barriers to the widespread adoption of bio-based products, particularly those with higher production costs.

    Developed countries have established comprehensive policy frameworks to facilitate the development and adoption of bio-based materials. These measures frequently encompass substantial investments in research funding, tax incentives for corporations, and market development initiatives. A supportive policy environment has been demonstrated to foster innovation, mitigate risk for private sector investments, and provide incentives for farmers to adopt environmentally friendly practices. Similarly, the government has prioritized the development of the bio-based materials industry in China, providing financial support through subsidies, loan interest discounts, and other economic instruments to encourage research and production. Moreover, the application of bio-based materials in agricultural practices is actively promoted in China.

    Despite the gap in production scale and commercialization of BB-CRFs between developed and developing countries, the global landscape is evolving rapidly. International collaboration and knowledge sharing are crucial, especially in developing countries. Through technological advancements and growing consumer awareness, BB-CRFs are expected to gain broader global recognition in the future and contribute to a more sustainable and food-secure future.

    Bridging this gap requires not only technological advancements and increased awareness but also targeted efforts to address the specific policy and financial constraints hindering BB-CRFs adoption in developing countries. A crucial step towards achieving this is the collection of more granular data on these constraints. This includes analyzing existing fertilizer subsidy programs to understand their potential impact on BB-CRFs uptake, quantifying research investments specifically targeted at sustainable fertilizer technologies in developing countries, and conducting in-depth case studies to examine the diverse factors influencing BB-CRFs development and adoption in different contexts. This data will be essential for informing policy decisions, attracting investment, and designing effective interventions to support the growth of the BB-CRFs sector in developing regions and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable global agricultural landscape.

    BB-CRFs offer a promising pathway towards sustainable agricultural intensification in tropical regions, addressing key challenges like nutrient loss and environmental degradation. Their use of renewable biomass resources and biodegradable coatings enhances nutrient use efficiency, minimizes environmental impact, and promotes soil health. Studies highlighted in this review demonstrate significant improvements in nutrient uptake, reductions in nutrient losses, and increased crop yields compared to conventional fertilizers. The tunable properties of bio-based coatings allow customization for diverse tropical cropping systems. However, challenges remain, including the need for further research on long-term environmental impacts and addressing disparities between developed and developing countries regarding research funding, technology access, and supportive policies.

    Future research should prioritize: (1) developing cost-effective, high-performing bio-based coatings tailored to tropical conditions; (2) advancing intelligent controlled-release technologies; (3) conducting comprehensive life-cycle assessments; (4) implementing targeted policies and educational programs to promote wider adoption, especially among smallholder farmers in developing countries; and (5) conducting dedicated market research to understand consumer preferences and optimize marketing strategies. Addressing these priorities through collaborative partnerships will be crucial for maximizing the benefits of BB-CRFs and achieving a more sustainable and productive agricultural future in the tropics.

  • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Qiao Y, Sun S; draft manuscript preparation: Qiao Y, Zhang L, Sun S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

  • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

  • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22178137), and the Earmarked Fund for CARS (CARS-31).

  • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Shaolong Sun is the Editorial Board member of Tropical Plants who was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and the research groups.

  • [1]

    FAO. 2018. The future of food and agriculture – alternative pathways to 2050. www.fao.org/3/I8429EN/i8429en.pdf

    [2]

    Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, et al. 2010. Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812−18

    doi: 10.1126/science.1185383

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Barrett G, Campbell CD, Hodge A. 2014. The direct response of the external mycelium of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi to temperature and the implications for nutrient transfer. Soil Biology and Biochemistry 78:109−117

    doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.07.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Reay DS, Davidson EA, Smith KA, Smith P, Melillo JM, et al. 2012. Global agriculture and nitrous oxide emissions. Nature Climate Change 2(6):410−416

    doi: 10.1038/nclimate1458

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Chen J, Ran W, Zhao Y, Zhao Z, Song Y. 2024. Effects of fertilization on soil ecological stoichiometry and fruit quality in Karst pitaya orchard. Scientific Reports 14(1):18307

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-68831-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Li D, He H, Pan Y, Wen X, Yang S. 2024. Risk assessment of nitrogen runoff from rice fields under natural precipitation conditions based on different transplanting dates and water levels. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 155:2005−2016

    doi: 10.1007/s00704-023-04744-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Dimkpa C, Adzawla W, Pandey R, Atakora WK, Kouame AK, et al. 2023. Fertilizers for food and nutrition security in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of soil health implications. Frontiers in Soil Science 3:1123931

    doi: 10.3389/fsoil.2023.1123931

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Chen X, Guo T, Yang H, Zhang L, Xue Y, et al. 2022. Environmentally friendly preparation of lignin/paraffin/epoxy resin composite-coated urea and evaluation for nitrogen efficiency in lettuce. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 221:1130−1141

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.09.112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Chen J, Fan X, Zhang L, Chen X, Sun S, et al. 2020. Research progress in lignin-based slow/controlled release fertilizer. Chemsuschem 13(17):4356−66

    doi: 10.1002/cssc.202000455

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Li Z, Wang H, Chen X, Zhang L, Huang C, et al. 2024. Nutrient and growth elucidation of a novel coated urea on oilseed rape in three main cultivation areas. Advanced Agrochem 3(3):246−255

    doi: 10.1016/j.aac.2024.03.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang W, Liang Z, He X, Wang X, Shi X, et al. 2019. The effects of controlled release urea on maize productivity and reactive nitrogen losses: A meta-analysis. Environmental Pollution 246:559−565

    doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.059

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Lehmann J, Bossio DA, Kögel-Knabner I, Rillig MC. 2020. The concept and future prospects of soil health. Nature Reviews. Earth & Environment 1(10):544−53

    doi: 10.1038/s43017-020-0080-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Ma Z, Liang T, Fu H, Ma Q, Chang D, et al. 2024. Long-term green manuring increases soil carbon sequestration via decreasing qCO2 caused by lower microbial phosphorus limitation in a dry land field. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 374: 109142

    [14]

    Duan Q, Jiang S, Chen F, Li Z, Ma L, et al. 2023. Fabrication, evaluation methodologies and models of slow-release fertilizers: a review. Industrial Crops and Products 192:116075

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Chen X, Li Z, Zhang L, Wang H, Qiu C, et al. 2021 Preparation of a novel lignin-based film with high solid content and its physicochemical characteristics. Industrial Crops and Products 164: 113396

    [16]

    Tian H, Wang L, Zhu X, Zhang M, Li L, et al. 2024. Biodegradation of microplastics derived from controlled release fertilizer coating: Selective microbial colonization and metabolism in plastisphere. Science of the Total Environment 920:170978

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170978

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Shaviv A, Mikkelsen RL, Technion HIFO. 1993. Controlled-release fertilizers to increase efficiency of nutrient use and minimize environmental degradation − a review. Fertilizer Research 35:1−12

    doi: 10.1007/BF00750215

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Chen X, Guo T, Mo X, Zhang L, Wang R, et al. 2023. Reduced nutrient release and greenhouse gas emissions of lignin-based coated urea by synergy of carbon black and polysiloxane. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 231:123334

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123334

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Khan HA, Naqvi SR, Mehran MT, Khoja AH, Khan Niazi MB, et al. 2021. A performance evaluation study of nano-biochar as a potential slow-release nano-fertilizer from wheat straw residue for sustainable agriculture. Chemosphere 285:131382

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.131382

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Sun S, Wang W, Liu F, Zhang L, Fan X. 2019. Coating layer preparation with mixed vegetable oil and nutrient release regulation of fertilizer. European Polymer Journal 120:109194

    doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2019.08.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Yuan S, Zhou T, Tan Z. 2023. New straw coating material for improving the slow-release performance of fertilizers. ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 15(33):39818−39826

    doi: 10.1021/acsami.3c06408

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Weng J, Zhai X, Zhang G, Su X, Yang Y, et al. 2023. Densified and water-repellent biodegradable starch/PBAT composite films-packaged fertilizers: prediction model, controlled-release mechanism and rice application. Chemical Engineering Journal 475:146242

    doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2023.146242

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Lucas N, Bienaime C, Belloy C, Queneudec M, Silvestre F, et al. 2008. Polymer biodegradation: Mechanisms and estimation techniques – A review. Chemosphere 73(4):429−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.06.064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Wang C, Song S, Yang Z, Liu Y, He Z, et al. 2022. Hydrophobic modification of castor oil-based polyurethane coated fertilizer to improve the controlled release of nutrient with polysiloxane and halloysite. Progress in Organic Coatings: An International Review Journal 165:106756

    doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2022.106756

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Karimi M, Shirzad M, Silva JAC, Rodrigues AE. 2022. Biomass/Biochar carbon materials for CO2 capture and sequestration by cyclic adsorption processes: a review and prospects for future directions. Journal of CO2 Utilization 57:101890

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcou.2022.101890

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Samir A, Ashour FH, Hakim AAA, Bassyouni M. 2022. Recent advances in biodegradable polymers for sustainable applications. NPJ Materials Degradation 6:68

    doi: 10.1038/s41529-022-00277-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Cywar RM, Rorrer NA, Hoyt CB, Beckham GT, Chen EYX. 2022. Bio-based polymers with performance-advantaged properties. Nature Reviews Materials 7(2):83−103

    doi: 10.1038/s41578-021-00363-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Armanu EG, Bertoldi S, Schmidt M, Heipieper HJ, Volf I, et al. 2025. Hydrochar from agricultural waste as a biobased support matrix enhances the bacterial degradation of diethyl phthalate. Molecules 30(5):1167

    doi: 10.3390/molecules30051167

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Ali S, Isha, Chang YC. 2023. Ecotoxicological impact of bioplastics biodegradation: a comprehensive review. Processes 11:3445

    doi: 10.3390/pr11123445

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Zhao Y, Zhang M, Liu Z, Yang F. 2024. Migration and transformation of soil phosphorus by organic acids: a global meta-analysis. Journal of Soils and Sediments 24:589−602

    doi: 10.1007/s11368-023-03665-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Mosier A, Wassmann R, Verchot L, King J, Palm C. 2004. Methane and nitrogen oxide fluxes in tropical agricultural soils: sources, sinks and mechanisms. Environment, Development and Sustainability 6:11−49

    doi: 10.1023/B:ENVI.0000003627.43162.ae

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Agegnehu G, Amede T. 2017. Integrated soil fertility and plant nutrient management in tropical agro-ecosystems: a review. Pedosphere 27(4):662−80

    doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60382-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Amede T, Amézquita Collazos E, Ashby JA, Ayarza MA, Barrios E, et al. 2003. Biological nitrogen fixation: a key input to integrated soil fertility management in the tropics. Workshop on Biological Nitrogen Fixation for Increased Crop Productivity, Enhanced Human Health and Sustained Soil Fertility, 2002, Montpellier, France; Institut National de Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Patancheru. International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT), Montpellier, France. pp. 113−43. https://hdl.handle.net/10568/77819

    [34]

    Huddell AM, Galford GL, Tully KL, Crowley C, Palm CA, et al. 2020. Meta-analysis on the potential for increasing nitrogen losses from intensifying tropical agriculture. Global change biology 26(3):1668−80

    doi: 10.1111/gcb.14951

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    You L, Ros GH, Chen Y, Zhang F, de Vries W. 2024. Optimized agricultural management reduces global cropland nitrogen losses to air and water. Nature Food 5:995−1004

    doi: 10.1038/s43016-024-01076-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Noulas C, Torabian S, Qin R. 2023. Crop nutrient requirements and advanced fertilizer management strategies. Agronomy 13:2017

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy13082017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Ishak MIS, Al Manasir Y, Nor Ashikin NSS, Md Yusuff MS, Zuknik M, Abdul Khalil HPS. 2021. Application of cellulosic fiber in soil erosion mitigation: prospect and challenges. BioResources 16(2):4474−522

    doi: 10.15376/biores.16.2.Syakir

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Witt T, Robinson N, Palma AC, Cernusak LA, Pratt S, et al. 2024. Evaluating novel biodegradable polymer matrix fertilizers for nitrogen-efficient agriculture. Journal of Environmental Quality 53:287−99

    doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20552

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Natarelli CVL, Lopes CMS, Carneiro JSS, Melo LCA, Oliveira JE, et al. 2021. Zinc slow-release systems for maize using biodegradable PBAT nanofibers obtained by solution blow spinning. Journal of Materials Science 56:4896−908

    doi: 10.1007/s10853-020-05545-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Abg Ahmad DFB, Wasli ME, Tan CSY, Musa Z, Chin AF. 2023. Eco-friendly cellulose hydrogels as controlled release fertilizer for enhanced growth and yield of upland rice. Scientific Reports 13:20453

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-47922-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zhao X, Ma F, Yan L, Liu J, Zhang T, et a. 2024. Double-modified biopolymer-coatings based on recyclable poplar-catkin: efficient performance, controlled-release mechanism and rice application. Progress in Organic Coatings 186:107980

    doi: 10.1016/j.porgcoat.2023.107980

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Rose KME, Baribault TW, Jacobs DF. 2016. Alternative field fertilization techniques to promote restoration of leguminous Acacia koa on contrasting tropical sites. Forest Ecology and Management 376:126−34

    doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.06.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Zang X, Yun T, Wang L, Zhan R, Ding Z, et al. 2024. Water-retaining agent as a sustainable agricultural technique to enhance mango (Mangifera indica L.) productivity in tropical soils. Agronomy 14:530

    doi: 10.3390/agronomy14030530

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Zhao Z, Verburg K, Huth N. 2017. Modelling sugarcane nitrogen uptake patterns to inform design of controlled release fertiliser for synchrony of N supply and demand. Field Crops Research 213:51−64

    doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Fertahi S, Ilsouk M, Zeroual Y, Oukarroum A, Barakat A. 2021. Recent trends in organic coating based on biopolymers and biomass for controlled and slow release fertilizers. Journal of Controlled Release 330:341−61

    doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.12.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    UN Trade & Development. 2022. Time to empower consumers to make sustainable choices. https://unctad.org/news/time-empower-consumers-make-sustainable-choices

    [47]

    Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Stuart Chapin F 3rd, et al. 2009. A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472−75

    doi: 10.1038/461472a

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Wang X, Yang Y, Zhong S, Meng Q, Li Y, et al. 2024. Advances in controlled-release fertilizer encapsulated by organic-inorganic composite membranes. Particuology 84:236−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.partic.2023.06.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Gebbers R, Adamchuk VI. 2010. Precision agriculture and food security. Science 327:828−31

    doi: 10.1126/science.1183899

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhang W, Qiao Y, Lakshmanan P, Yuan L, Liu J, et al. 2022. Combing public-private partnership and large-scale farming increased net ecosystem carbon budget and reduced carbon footprint of maize production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 184:106411

    doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    FAO. 2015. Agricultural markets and sustainable development: global value chains, smallholder farmers and digital innovations. CCP74/21/INF/7 - In Brief - The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets (SOCO) 2020, Virtual. Rome, Italy: FAO Committee on Commodity Problems (CCP). https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/6f3677d0-d2de-4c3d-b28b-4d22a1e70e65

    [52]

    FAO. 2020. In Brief to The State of Agricultural Commodity Markets 2020. Rome, Italy: FAO. https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/a92d8299-cadb-483f-9bf2-b2b66412f518

    [53]

    European Bioplastics. 2024. Bioplastics market development update 2024. www.european-bioplastics.org/market/

    [54]

    Liang J, Huo P, Mo X, Zhang L, Fan X, et al. 2023. Fostering sustainable banana cultivation: Maximizing red soil performance with lignin-based humic acid liquid fertilizer. Agriculture Communications 1(2):100018

    doi: 10.1016/j.agrcom.2023.100018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Saracoglu P, Ozmen MM. 2021. Starch based nanogels: from synthesis to miscellaneous applications. Starch - Stä rke 73:2100011

    doi: 10.1002/star.202100011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Qiao Y, Zhang L, Sun S. 2025. Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers: a sustainable solution for tropical agriculture. Tropical Plants 4: e008 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0001
    Qiao Y, Zhang L, Sun S. 2025. Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers: a sustainable solution for tropical agriculture. Tropical Plants 4: e008 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0001

Figures(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(661) PDF downloads(159)

Other Articles By Authors

MINI REVIEW   Open Access    

Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers: a sustainable solution for tropical agriculture

Tropical Plants  4 Article number: e008  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers (BB-CRFs) offer a sustainable solution for enhancing nutrient use efficiency and minimizing the environmental footprint of agriculture, particularly in tropical regions. Utilizing biodegradable coatings derived from renewable resources like lignin and starch, BB-CRFs address challenges specific to tropical agriculture, including nutrient leaching due to heavy rainfall and nitrogen volatilization from high temperatures. While developed nations benefit from advanced research and supportive policies driving BB-CRFs adoption, developing tropical regions face challenges related to production costs, technology access, and market awareness. Realizing the full potential of BB-CRFs for tropical plants requires collaborative efforts focused on developing cost-effective, high-performing bio-based coatings tailored to tropical conditions, advancing intelligent controlled-release technologies suited to the needs of specific tropical crops, fostering international collaboration for knowledge and technology transfer, and implementing supportive policies and educational programs to promote wider adoption in these regions. This is crucial for optimizing nutrition for diverse tropical crops like rice, banana, oil palm, coffee, and cocoa, ultimately contributing to increased productivity and environmental sustainability in these sensitive ecosystems.

    • The increasing global demand for food security and the necessity for environmental conservation have collectively driven the adoption of sustainable and low-carbon agricultural practices[1,2]. This urgency is particularly acute in tropical regions, which face unique challenges related to climate, soil properties, and socioeconomic factors. These regions are often characterized by intense rainfall leading to nutrient leaching, high temperatures causing nitrogen volatilization, and fragile ecosystems vulnerable to environmental degradation. Furthermore, many tropical countries are developing economies with limited resources for agricultural inputs and infrastructure. Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers (BB-CRFs) emerge as a promising technology to address these challenges, offering a potential pathway toward more sustainable and resilient agricultural systems.

      Although traditional fertilizers have played an important role in enhancing crop productivity, a series of environmental issues have also been triggered through their application, including soil degradation[3], greenhouse gas emissions[4], and water pollution[5]. These issues are often exacerbated in tropical regions due to intense rainfall, high temperatures, and sensitive ecosystems. For instance, heavy rainfall in Southeast Asia often leads to substantial nitrogen runoff from rice paddies, polluting waterways, and contributing to eutrophication[6]. Similarly, high temperatures in sub-Saharan Africa can accelerate nitrogen volatilization from urea-based fertilizers, reducing fertilizer efficiency, and increasing greenhouse gas emissions[7]. To address these challenges, BB-CRFs have emerged as a promising solution, offering a transformative approach to achieving the vision of a green and low-carbon agricultural landscape[8,9]. The encapsulation of nutrients within biodegradable coatings facilitates the gradual release of essential elements, thereby enhancing the efficiency of nutrient utilization[10], mitigating environmental pollution[11], promoting soil health[12], and fostering carbon sequestration[13]. These factors collectively contribute to the growth of green carbon sinks and enhance the resilience of tropical agroecosystems. Moreover, the reduced need for frequent fertilizer applications can offer economic benefits to tropical farmers.

      BB-CRFs represent a pivotal innovation in the agricultural fertilizer industry, demonstrating enormous market potential, particularly in tropical regions. As the global pursuit of sustainable agricultural practices and green carbon sequestration intensifies, BB-CRFs have garnered considerable attention due to their environmentally benign nature and capacity to augment fertilizer efficiency[14,15]. In contrast to their conventional chemical-coated counterparts, BB-CRFs created using naturally degradable materials can ensure controlled nutrient release while minimizing potential risks to soil and environmental integrity[16]. This positions BB-CRFs as a holistic solution that harmonizes increased crop yield with environmental stewardship, crucial for the long-term sustainability of tropical agriculture.

      Although the potential of BB-CRFs is recognized globally, there are significant differences in developmental trajectories, technological advancements, market acceptance, and policy support across different regions[17]. This is particularly evident when comparing developed nations with tropical developing countries. This underscores the need for collaborative efforts from governments, research institutions, and enterprises to propel the advancement of BB-CRFs, specifically tailored for tropical applications. Therefore, to improve the performance of BB-CRFs in tropical contexts, reduce production costs, and expand their adoption rate amongst tropical farmers, governments, and international organizations should strengthen research investment targeted at tropical needs, improve policy frameworks that incentivize sustainable agriculture in these regions, and enhance international cooperation focusing on technology transfer and capacity building. BB-CRFs hold considerable promise for advancing sustainable intensification in tropical agriculture by improving nutrient use efficiency, reducing environmental impacts, and supporting the livelihoods of farmers.

    • Bio-based materials, derived from renewable biomass resources such as lignin[18], straw[19], vegetable oils[20], and starch[21], offer a compelling alternative to conventional petroleum-based coatings. These materials are inherently biodegradable and environmentally compatible, thereby contributing to the development of a more sustainable agricultural model. The advantages of bio-based materials over traditional counterparts are numerous and diverse (Fig. 1a).

      Figure 1. 

      (a) Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers (BB-CRFs) vs traditional coated controlled-release fertilizer. (b) The gap in BB-CRFs development between developed and developing countries. (c) Bio-based coating materials from enterprises in different countries.

    • BB-CRFs offer multiple advantages for soil and environmental health beyond their inherent biodegradability. The controlled-release mechanism significantly enhances nutrient use efficiency compared to conventional fertilizers, reducing the need for high application rates and thus minimizing the risk of nutrient pollution. For instance, Chen et al.[8] found that lignin/paraffin/epoxy resin composite-coated urea increased nitrogen use efficiency by 33% in lettuce. Similarly, Weng et al.[22] reported a 71.75% increase in rice yield with starch/PBAT composite film-packaged fertilizers, attributed to enhanced nutrient release longevity (20–100 days) and reduced water vapor transmission. These improvements stem from the utilization of renewable biomass resources, which decreases dependence on finite fossil fuels[23], promoting resource security and lowering the carbon footprint of fertilizer production. The biodegradability of these coatings ensures their decomposition by soil microorganisms, preventing the accumulation of non-biodegradable waste and enriching the soil with organic matter. This, in turn, improves carbon sequestration, reduces carbon emissions[24,25], and fosters a thriving soil ecosystem by promoting positive interactions with soil microorganisms[26]. Importantly, bio-based coating materials are generally non-toxic and safe for crops and the environment, posing no threat to food safety[27]. Their tunable properties, including hydrophobicity and degradation rate, can be adjusted to meet specific crop and soil requirements, ensuring optimal and synchronized nutrient release[28].

    • While bio-based coatings represent a more sustainable alternative to conventional polymers, their long-term environmental impacts require further investigation. Although biodegradable, the decomposition process and coating properties warrant careful scrutiny. Potential concerns include the release of intermediate byproducts during degradation, which could have unforeseen ecotoxicological effects on soil organisms, water quality, or non-target plants[29]. For instance, certain polysaccharides might release organic acids, temporarily altering soil pH[30]. Under anaerobic conditions common in some tropical soils, decomposition could produce methane, a potent greenhouse gas[31]. Additionally, the introduction of these coatings could alter the soil microbiome, with potential consequences for nutrient cycling and soil health. Finally, the production of bio-based materials, though renewable, requires resources and necessitates life cycle assessments to evaluate their true environmental footprint compared to conventional alternatives.

      Mitigating these potential risks requires further research focusing on toxicity studies of coatings and their degradation products, optimized coating design to minimize harmful byproducts and enhance biodegradability, and comprehensive life cycle assessments. This research will contribute to a more complete understanding of the environmental implications of bio-based coatings and guide the responsible development and implementation of BB-CRFs technology. Specifically, studies investigating the effects of various coatings on microbial diversity, nutrient cycling, and soil structure are needed. Furthermore, research into tailoring coating composition and degradation rates to match specific soil conditions and cropping systems will be crucial for maximizing benefits and minimizing potential negative impacts.

    • Tropical agriculture presents unique challenges and opportunities for the implementation of innovative fertilizer technologies such as BB-CRFs[32]. The distinct climatic conditions, soil properties, and cropping systems of tropical regions require tailored approaches to nutrient management[33]. BB-CRFs offer several advantages that are specifically suited to the needs of tropical agriculture.

      A key benefit is the ability of BB-CRFs to mitigate nutrient losses, a major concern in tropical environments. Heavy rainfall can cause significant leaching of essential nutrients such as nitrogen and potassium, reducing the effectiveness of fertilizer and contributing to water pollution[34]. The controlled-release mechanism of BB-CRFs minimizes these losses by providing nutrients gradually, synchronized with crop demand. This leads to improved nutrient use efficiency and reduced environmental impact, which are essential for sustainable agriculture in tropical regions.

      Furthermore, high temperatures in tropical climates can accelerate the volatilization of nitrogenous fertilizers, resulting in further nutrient loss and air pollution[35]. The protective coating of BB-CRFs helps reduce nitrogen volatilization, preserving valuable nutrients, and minimizing environmental damage.

    • The diverse range of tropical crops often exhibit specific nutrient requirements at different growth stages[36]. BB-CRFs can be formulated with specific nutrient combinations and coatings that are tailored to match the unique requirements of individual tropical crops. This targeted approach optimizes the uptake of nutrients and promotes healthy plant growth, which in turn leads to improved yields and quality.

      In addition to their role in nutrient delivery, BB-CRFs contribute to the overall health of tropical agroecosystems[37,38]. The degradation of bio-based coatings results in the addition of organic matter to the soil, which in turn improves soil structure, water retention, and microbial activity. This has the effect of enhancing soil fertility and resilience, thereby rendering tropical cropping systems more sustainable and less vulnerable to environmental stresses such as drought and erosion[39]. The enhancement of soil health is a crucial element in ensuring the long-term productivity and ecological integrity of tropical agricultural landscapes.

    • The potential of BB-CRFs applications in tropical crops is illustrated by specific examples. In rice cultivation, BB-CRFs enhances nitrogen use efficiency in flooded conditions[40,41]. In banana plantations, it supports robust growth and improves fruit quality[42]. For Mangifera indica L., it optimizes nutrient supply for sustained yields[43]. In sugarcane farming, it enhances nutrient uptake for improved sugarcane quality and yield[44]. These targeted applications showcase the versatility and effectiveness of BB-CRFs in diverse tropical cropping systems.

    • Beyond improvements in yield and quality, BB-CRFs hold potential for enhancing the resilience of tropical crops to stresses like drought and pests/diseases. While anecdotal evidence and indirect findings suggest potential benefits in these areas, dedicated research exploring the underlying mechanisms is currently limited. For instance, the improved soil structure resulting from the degradation of bio-based coatings could enhance water retention and drought resistance[18], but direct studies on drought tolerance in tropical crops using BB-CRFs are lacking. Similarly, the influence of BB-CRFs on the soil microbiome may contribute to improved disease suppression, but further research is needed to investigate these interactions specifically in relation to pest and disease resistance in tropical crops.

    • Several factors are converging to create a strong market for BB-CRFs. Consumers are increasingly conscious of the environmental impact of their choices, driving demand for sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives across sectors, including agriculture[45]. This shift in consumer preference aligns with government initiatives worldwide implementing policies and incentives to encourage sustainable agricultural practices, including the use of environmentally friendly fertilizers such as BB-CRFs[46]. There is an urgent need for sustainable agricultural intensification to meet the food demands of a growing global population while minimizing environmental impact, which creates a mature environment for the adoption of BB-CRFs[47]. In addition, the advancement of material science and production processes has resulted in a gradual decline in the cost of BB-CRFs, thereby making them highly competitive in the market[48]. The integration of big data analytics and intelligent technologies into agricultural practices can more accurately and efficiently manage BB-CRFs, thereby enhancing their market potential[49].

    • To fully capitalize on the market potential of BB-CRFs, it is essential that there be strategic collaboration among research institutions, industry stakeholders, and policymakers. The establishment of robust research platforms that foster collaboration between agricultural universities, research institutions, and private companies will facilitate continuous innovation in materials and technologies[50]. The government plays a key role in this endeavor by providing policy guidance, allocating financial support through tax incentives and green credit schemes, and facilitating knowledge transfer to reduce investment risks and encourage private sector participation.

    • Demonstration trials and farmer education programs are crucial for showcasing the benefits of BB-CRFs, such as increased yields, reduced fertilizer input, and improved crop quality, while also increasing farmers' understanding of the technology[51]. Enterprises should collaborate with distributors, agricultural cooperatives, and service providers can streamline distribution channels, ensuring that BB-CRFs reach farmers efficiently. Furthermore, innovative business models such as the sharing economy and digital platforms for agricultural investment can facilitate the accelerated dissemination of BB-CRFs[52].

    • By closely monitoring market trends and based on user feedback, BB-CRFs manufacturers quickly respond to improve their products and expand into new niche markets. The distinctive combination of environmental sustainability and high efficiency inherent in BB-CRFs can bring transformative opportunities to the fertilizer industry.

    • Understanding the specific needs and preferences of different consumer segments is crucial for developing effective marketing strategies. While comprehensive market research data on BB-CRFs adoption is currently limited, we can offer some preliminary insights. Organic agricultural producers, driven by principles of sustainability and natural inputs, may be particularly receptive to BB-CRFs; however, cost considerations and the availability of certified organic BB-CRFs could influence adoption rates. Adoption among conventional farmers will likely hinge on demonstrable economic benefits, such as increased yields, reduced fertilizer inputs, and labor savings, as well as practical considerations like ease of application. Large-scale agribusinesses may be motivated by the potential of BB-CRFs to improve sustainability performance, meet corporate social responsibility goals, and enhance brand image; scalability of production and consistent product quality will be key factors for this segment. Robust market research is essential to validate these assumptions and refine marketing strategies. Key research areas include consumer surveys to assess awareness and willingness to adopt BB-CRFs, price sensitivity analysis to determine optimal pricing, and distribution channel analysis to evaluate effective outreach strategies.

    • There are notable discrepancies in the advancement and implementation of BB-CRFs between developed and developing countries (Fig. 1b). Developed countries, particularly in Europe and North America, have made significant investments in bio-based coating technologies, driven by a strong emphasis on environmental sustainability and the reduction of reliance on traditional plastics in agriculture[53]. In contrast, while developing countries, including China, have begun to embrace bio-based materials, their progress is relatively nascent, hindered by challenges related to production costs, technological capabilities, and market awareness[54].

    • Developed countries have made significant progress in developing various bio-based coating materials based on their advanced capabilities in materials science, industrial technology, and biotechnology (Fig. 1c). These materials range from conventional options such as starch and polylactic acid (PLA) to novel biopolymers and synthetic biology products such as polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs), polybutylene succinate (PBS), and bio-based polyethylene terephthalate (PET)[55]. Many of these materials have been successfully commercialized for various agricultural applications. Although China has made remarkable progress in bio-based materials research, there is still a gap in the development and commercialization of novel materials. However, research institutions and companies are actively investing in China to bridge this gap, with a particular focus on improving materials performance and cost efficiency.

    • The demand for bio-based materials in developed markets is driven by stringent regulations and consumer preferences. The legislative measures to restrict the use of plastics and promote biodegradable products, coupled with a high level of environmental awareness among consumers willing to pay a premium for eco-friendly options, have created a favorable market environment for BB-CRFs in these regions. In contrast, despite the implementation of environmental policies and initiatives in China, including the plastic ban, practical challenges of enforcement and the price sensitivity of the market pose barriers to the widespread adoption of bio-based products, particularly those with higher production costs.

    • Developed countries have established comprehensive policy frameworks to facilitate the development and adoption of bio-based materials. These measures frequently encompass substantial investments in research funding, tax incentives for corporations, and market development initiatives. A supportive policy environment has been demonstrated to foster innovation, mitigate risk for private sector investments, and provide incentives for farmers to adopt environmentally friendly practices. Similarly, the government has prioritized the development of the bio-based materials industry in China, providing financial support through subsidies, loan interest discounts, and other economic instruments to encourage research and production. Moreover, the application of bio-based materials in agricultural practices is actively promoted in China.

    • Despite the gap in production scale and commercialization of BB-CRFs between developed and developing countries, the global landscape is evolving rapidly. International collaboration and knowledge sharing are crucial, especially in developing countries. Through technological advancements and growing consumer awareness, BB-CRFs are expected to gain broader global recognition in the future and contribute to a more sustainable and food-secure future.

      Bridging this gap requires not only technological advancements and increased awareness but also targeted efforts to address the specific policy and financial constraints hindering BB-CRFs adoption in developing countries. A crucial step towards achieving this is the collection of more granular data on these constraints. This includes analyzing existing fertilizer subsidy programs to understand their potential impact on BB-CRFs uptake, quantifying research investments specifically targeted at sustainable fertilizer technologies in developing countries, and conducting in-depth case studies to examine the diverse factors influencing BB-CRFs development and adoption in different contexts. This data will be essential for informing policy decisions, attracting investment, and designing effective interventions to support the growth of the BB-CRFs sector in developing regions and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable global agricultural landscape.

    • BB-CRFs offer a promising pathway towards sustainable agricultural intensification in tropical regions, addressing key challenges like nutrient loss and environmental degradation. Their use of renewable biomass resources and biodegradable coatings enhances nutrient use efficiency, minimizes environmental impact, and promotes soil health. Studies highlighted in this review demonstrate significant improvements in nutrient uptake, reductions in nutrient losses, and increased crop yields compared to conventional fertilizers. The tunable properties of bio-based coatings allow customization for diverse tropical cropping systems. However, challenges remain, including the need for further research on long-term environmental impacts and addressing disparities between developed and developing countries regarding research funding, technology access, and supportive policies.

      Future research should prioritize: (1) developing cost-effective, high-performing bio-based coatings tailored to tropical conditions; (2) advancing intelligent controlled-release technologies; (3) conducting comprehensive life-cycle assessments; (4) implementing targeted policies and educational programs to promote wider adoption, especially among smallholder farmers in developing countries; and (5) conducting dedicated market research to understand consumer preferences and optimize marketing strategies. Addressing these priorities through collaborative partnerships will be crucial for maximizing the benefits of BB-CRFs and achieving a more sustainable and productive agricultural future in the tropics.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22178137), and the Earmarked Fund for CARS (CARS-31).

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Qiao Y, Sun S; draft manuscript preparation: Qiao Y, Zhang L, Sun S. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Shaolong Sun is the Editorial Board member of Tropical Plants who was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and the research groups.

      • Received 16 November 2024; Accepted 7 January 2025; Published online 19 March 2025

      • BB-CRFs offer a sustainable alternative to conventional fertilizers, minimizing nutrient loss and environmental impact in tropical agriculture.

        BB-CRFs improve nutrient delivery to tropical crops, optimizing plant growth and yield while promoting soil health.

        Significant market potential exists for BB-CRFs driven by consumer demand and policy support, but addressing global disparities in development is crucial.

        Future research should focus on developing cost-effective coatings, advancing controlled-release technologies, and promoting wider adoption in developing regions.

        BB-CRFs offer a promising pathway towards sustainable intensification of agriculture in the tropics, but further research and targeted policies are needed to fully realize their potential.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  References (55)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Qiao Y, Zhang L, Sun S. 2025. Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers: a sustainable solution for tropical agriculture. Tropical Plants 4: e008 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0001
    Qiao Y, Zhang L, Sun S. 2025. Biomass-based coated controlled-release fertilizers: a sustainable solution for tropical agriculture. Tropical Plants 4: e008 doi: 10.48130/tp-0025-0001

Catalog

  • About this article

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return