Search
1992 Volume 7
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Innovative design systems: where are we, and where do we go from here? Part II: Design by exploration

More Information
  • Abstract: Designing is a skill central to many human tasks. Designers are constantly producing newer and better artifacts, generating innovative solutions to problems in our world. This article looks at innovation and research that is aimed at developing theories and methodologies for innovative design. We view design as a process of association and exploration. These two approaches are fundamental to innovation. The aim of exploration is to generate a large variety of design alternatives by breaking away from the norms, by looking in unlikely places, and by relaxing binding constraints. Exploration exposes possibilities that would not normally have been considered, possibilities that may serendipitously lead to innovative solutions. Association, on the other hand, attempts to exploit previous design experiences in a new design context. This is done by recognizing useful analogies that can help in synthesizing parts of a design, recognizing unforeseen problems, and discovering opportunities. This article is the second part of a two-part paper that presents and discusses a variety of association and exploration methods. This part examines exploration techniques, some of which have been used in actual design systems, and others that point to the solution of some open questions in design research. We develop these ideas by examining connections between design research and other disciplines such as artificial intelligence, evolutionary epistemology, and the automated discovery literature.
  • 加载中
  • Addanki S and Davis ES, 1985. “A representation for complex domains”. In Proc. 9th Int. Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar

    Blum RL, 1982. “Discovery and representation of causal relationships from a large time-oriented, clinical database: The RX project”. In: Lindberg DAB (ed.), Medical Informatics, Volume 19. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Buchanan BG and Fiegenbaum EA, 1978. “Dendral and Meta-Dendral: Their application dimension”. Artificial Intelligence11 (1) 5–24.

    Google Scholar

    Cagan J, 1990. Innovative Design of mechanical structures from first principles. PhD thesis, Univ. of California.

    Google Scholar

    Cheyayeb F, 1987. A framework for engineering knowledge representation and problem solving. PhD thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar

    Coyne RE and Subrahmanian E., 1991. “Computer supported creative design: a pragmatic approach”. In: Gero J and Mahler M (eds.), Modeling Creativity and Knowledge Based Design. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar

    Coyne RD, Rosenman MA, Radford AD, Balachandaran M and Gero JS, 1989. Knowledge-Based Design Systems. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar

    Darwin C, 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. John Murray.

    Google Scholar

    Dyer MG, Flowers M and Hodges J, 1986. “EDISON: An Engineering Design Invention System Operating Naively”. In: Proc. 1st Int. Conference on Applications of AI to Engineering.

    Google Scholar

    Flemming U, Coyne R, Glavin T, Hung H and Rychener M, 1989. A generative expert system for the design of building layouts EDRC 48–15-89. Technical Report, Engineering Design Research Center, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar

    Grefenstette JJ, 1987. Genetic Algorithms and their Applications: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms.Morgan Kaufman.

    Google Scholar

    Koestler A, 1964. The Act of Creation. McMillan.

    Google Scholar

    Langley P, Simon HA, Bradshaw GL and Zytkow JM, 1987. Scientific Discovery—Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

    Lenat DB, 1976. AM: An artificial intelligence approach to discovery in mathematics as heuristic search. PhD thesis, Stanford University.

    Google Scholar

    Lenat DB, 1983. “EURISKO: a program that learns new heuristics and domain concepts, The nature of Heuristics III: program design and results”. Artificial Intelligence21 (1,2).

    Google Scholar

    Lenat DB, 1984. “Why AM and EURISKO appear to work”. Artificial Intelligence24269–294.

    Google Scholar

    Muller ET, 1987. Daydreaming and computation: a computer model of everyday creativity, learning, and emotions in the human stream of thought. PhD thesis, Univ. of California.

    Google Scholar

    Murthy S and Addanki S, 1987. “PROMPT: An innovative design tool”. In: Proc 6th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 637–642.

    Google Scholar

    Navin chandra D, 1987. Exploring for innovative designs by relaxing criteria and reasoning from precedent-based knowledge. PhD thesis, MIT.

    Google Scholar

    Navin chandra D, 1991. Exploration and Innovation in Design: Towards a Computational Model. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Pahl G and Beitz W, 1984. Engineering Design. The Design Council, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Papalambros P and Wilde D, 1988. Principles OF Optimal Design. CUP.

    Google Scholar

    Popper K, 1965. Conjectures and Refutations; The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar

    Quillian RM, 1968. “Semantic memory”. In: Minsky M (ed.), Semantic Information Processing. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar

    Spencer H, 1857. “Progress: its law and cause”. Westminster Review.

    Google Scholar

    Toulmin S, 1967. “The evolutionary development of natural science”. American Scientist 57.

    Google Scholar

    Walker MG, 1987. “How feasible is automated discovery”. IEEE Expert69–82, Spring.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    D. Navin Chandra. 1992. Innovative design systems: where are we, and where do we go from here? Part II: Design by exploration. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 7: doi: 10.1017/S0269888900006469
    D. Navin Chandra. 1992. Innovative design systems: where are we, and where do we go from here? Part II: Design by exploration. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 7: doi: 10.1017/S0269888900006469

Article Metrics

Article views(16) PDF downloads(78)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Innovative design systems: where are we, and where do we go from here? Part II: Design by exploration

The Knowledge Engineering Review  7 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888900006469  (1992)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: Designing is a skill central to many human tasks. Designers are constantly producing newer and better artifacts, generating innovative solutions to problems in our world. This article looks at innovation and research that is aimed at developing theories and methodologies for innovative design. We view design as a process of association and exploration. These two approaches are fundamental to innovation. The aim of exploration is to generate a large variety of design alternatives by breaking away from the norms, by looking in unlikely places, and by relaxing binding constraints. Exploration exposes possibilities that would not normally have been considered, possibilities that may serendipitously lead to innovative solutions. Association, on the other hand, attempts to exploit previous design experiences in a new design context. This is done by recognizing useful analogies that can help in synthesizing parts of a design, recognizing unforeseen problems, and discovering opportunities. This article is the second part of a two-part paper that presents and discusses a variety of association and exploration methods. This part examines exploration techniques, some of which have been used in actual design systems, and others that point to the solution of some open questions in design research. We develop these ideas by examining connections between design research and other disciplines such as artificial intelligence, evolutionary epistemology, and the automated discovery literature.

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 19921992Cambridge University Press
References (27)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    D. Navin Chandra. 1992. Innovative design systems: where are we, and where do we go from here? Part II: Design by exploration. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 7: doi: 10.1017/S0269888900006469
    D. Navin Chandra. 1992. Innovative design systems: where are we, and where do we go from here? Part II: Design by exploration. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 7: doi: 10.1017/S0269888900006469
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return