Search
2013 Volume 28
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning

More Information
  • Abstract: This paper presents a general approach to automatically compile e-learning models to planning, allowing us to easily generate plans, in the form of learning designs, by using existing domain-independent planners. The idea is to compile, first, a course defined in a standard e-learning language into a planning domain, and, second, a file containing students learning information into a planning problem. We provide a common compilation and extend it to three particular approaches that cover a full spectrum of planning paradigms, which increases the possibilities of using current planners: (i) hierarchical, (ii) including PDDL (Planning Domain Definition Language) actions with conditional effects and (iii) including PDDL durative actions. The learning designs are automatically generated from the plans and can be uploaded, and subsequently executed, by learning management platforms. We also provide an extensive analysis of the e-learning metadata specification required for planning, and the pros and cons on the knowledge engineering procedures used in each of the three compilations. Finally, we include some qualitative and quantitative experimentation of the compilations in several domain-independent planners to measure its scalability and applicability.
  • 加载中
  • Alonso C., Honey P.2002. Honey-alonso Learning Style Theoretical Basis (in Spanish). Retrieved December 2012, from http://www.estilosdeaprendizaje.es/menuprinc2.htm.

    Google Scholar

    Baldiris S., Santos O., Barrera C., Boticario J.G., Velez J., Fabregat R.2008. Integration of educational specifications and standards to support adaptive learning scenarios in ADAPTAPlan. Special Issue on New Trends on AI Techniques for Educational Technologies. International Journal of Computer Science and Applications5(1), 88–107.

    Google Scholar

    Boticario J., Santos O.2007. A dynamic assistance approach to support the development and modelling of adaptive learning scenarion based on educational standards. In Proceedings of Workshop on Authoring of Adaptive and Adaptable Hypermedia, International Conference on User Modelling, Corfu, Greece, 1–8.

    Google Scholar

    Camacho D., R-Moreno M.D., Obieta U.2007. CAMOU: a simple integrated e-learning and planning techniques tool. In 4th International Workshop on Constraints and Language Processing, Roskilde University, Denmark, 1–11.

    Google Scholar

    Castillo L., Fdez.-Olivares J., García-Perez O.Palao F.2006. Efficiently handling temporal knowledge in an HTN planner. In Proceedings of 16th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS 2006), Borrajo, D. & McCluskey, L. (eds.). AAAI, 63–72.

    Google Scholar

    Castillo L., Morales L., Gonzalez-Ferrer A., Fdez-Olivares J., Borrajo D., Onaindia E.2010. Automatic generation of temporal planning domains for e-learning problems. Journal of Scheduling13(4), 347–362.

    Google Scholar

    Essalmi F., Ayed L.J.B., Jemni M., Kinshuk, Graf S.2010. A fully personalization strategy of E-learning scenarios. Computers in Human Behavior26(4), 581–591.

    Google Scholar

    Felder R. M.1996. Matters of style. American Society for Engineering Education Prism6(4), 18–23.

    Google Scholar

    Fox M., Long D.2003. PDDL2.1: an extension to PDDL for expressing temporal planning domains. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research20, 61–124.

    Google Scholar

    Fuentetaja R., Borrajo D., Linares López C.2009. A look-ahead B&B search for cost-based planning. In Proceedings of CAEPIA'09, Murcia, Spain, 105–114.

    Google Scholar

    Garrido A., Onaindía E.2010. On the application of planning and scheduling techniques to E-learning. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Industrial, Engineering & Other Applications of Applied Intelligent Systems (IEA-AIE 2010)—Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6096, 244–253. Springer.

    Google Scholar

    Garrido A., Onaindia E., Morales L., Castillo L., Fernandez S., Borrajo D.2009. Modeling E-learning activities in automated planning. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Competition on Knowledge Engineering for Planning and Scheduling (ICKEPS-2009), Thessaloniki, Greece, 18–27.

    Google Scholar

    IMSLD2003. IMS Learning Design Specification. Version 1.0 (February, 2003). Retrieved December, 2012, from http://www.imsglobal.org/learningdesign.

    Google Scholar

    IMSMD2003. IMS Learning Resource Meta-data Specification. Version 1.3 (August, 2006). Retrieved December, 2012, from http://www.imsglobal.org/metadata.

    Google Scholar

    Kontopoulos E., Vrakas D., Kokkoras F., Bassiliades N., Vlahavas I.2008. An ontology-based planning system for e-course generation. Expert Systems with Applications35, 398–406.

    Google Scholar

    Limongelli C., Sciarrone F., Vaste G.2008. LS-plan: an effective combination of dynamic courseware generation and learning styles in web-based education. In Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, 5th International Conference, AH 2008, Nejdl, W., Kay, J., Pu, P. & Herder, E. (eds.)., 133–142. Springer.

    Google Scholar

    Méndez N.D.D., Ramírez C.J., Luna J.A.G.2005. IA planning for automatic generation of customized virtual courses. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications. Planning, scheduling and constraint satisfaction: from theory to practice117, 139–148.

    Google Scholar

    Mohan P., Greer J., McCalla G.2003. Instructional planning with learning objects. In IJCAI-03 Workshop Knowledge Representation and Automated Reasoning for E-Learning Systems, Acapulco, Mexico, 52–58.

    Google Scholar

    Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM)2004. Retrieved December, 2012, from http://scorm.com.

    Google Scholar

    Sicilia M.A., Sánchez-Alonso S., García-Barriocanal E.2006. On supporting the process of learning design through planners. CEUR Workshop Proceedings: Virtual Campus 2006 Post-Proceedings. Barcelona, Spain, 186(1), 81–89.

    Google Scholar

    Ullrich C2008. Pedagogically founded courseware generation for web-based learning, No. 5260, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence 5260, Springer.

    Google Scholar

    Ullrich C., Melis E.2009. Pedagogically founded courseware generation based on HTN-planning. Expert Systems With Applications36(5), 9319–9332.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Antonio Garrido, Susana Fernández, Lluvia Morales, Eva Onaindía, Daniel Borrajo, Luis Castillo. 2013. On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 28(2)121−136, doi: 10.1017/S0269888912000380
    Antonio Garrido, Susana Fernández, Lluvia Morales, Eva Onaindía, Daniel Borrajo, Luis Castillo. 2013. On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 28(2)121−136, doi: 10.1017/S0269888912000380

Article Metrics

Article views(16) PDF downloads(28)

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning

The Knowledge Engineering Review  28 2013, 28(2): 121−136  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: This paper presents a general approach to automatically compile e-learning models to planning, allowing us to easily generate plans, in the form of learning designs, by using existing domain-independent planners. The idea is to compile, first, a course defined in a standard e-learning language into a planning domain, and, second, a file containing students learning information into a planning problem. We provide a common compilation and extend it to three particular approaches that cover a full spectrum of planning paradigms, which increases the possibilities of using current planners: (i) hierarchical, (ii) including PDDL (Planning Domain Definition Language) actions with conditional effects and (iii) including PDDL durative actions. The learning designs are automatically generated from the plans and can be uploaded, and subsequently executed, by learning management platforms. We also provide an extensive analysis of the e-learning metadata specification required for planning, and the pros and cons on the knowledge engineering procedures used in each of the three compilations. Finally, we include some qualitative and quantitative experimentation of the compilations in several domain-independent planners to measure its scalability and applicability.

    • This work has been supported by the Spanish MICINN under projects TIN2008-06701-C03 and Consolider Ingenio 2010 CSD2007-00022, by the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology and the regional projects CCG08-UC3M/TIC-4141 and Prometeo GVA 2008/051.

    • Felder learning styles comprise four dimensions: perception (sensitive/intuitive), processing (active/reflective), input (visual/verbal) and understanding (sequential/global).

    • This learning styles theory considers four styles that can be parallelized; for instance pragmatic/active and reflexive/theoretical can be taken as two styles.

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 2013Cambridge University Press
References (22)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Antonio Garrido, Susana Fernández, Lluvia Morales, Eva Onaindía, Daniel Borrajo, Luis Castillo. 2013. On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 28(2)121−136, doi: 10.1017/S0269888912000380
    Antonio Garrido, Susana Fernández, Lluvia Morales, Eva Onaindía, Daniel Borrajo, Luis Castillo. 2013. On the automatic compilation of e-learning models to planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 28(2)121−136, doi: 10.1017/S0269888912000380
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return