Search
2016 Volume 31
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Parallel heuristic search in forward partial-order planning

More Information
  • Abstract: Most of the current top-performing planners are sequential planners that only handle total-order plans. Although this is a computationally efficient approach, the management of total-order plans restrict the choices of reasoning and thus the generation of flexible plans. In this paper, we present FLAP2, a forward-chaining planner that follows the principles of the classical POCL (Partial-Order Causal-Link Planning) paradigm. Working with partial-order plans allows FLAP2 to easily manage the parallelism of the plans, which brings several advantages: more flexible executions, shorter plan durations (makespan) and an easy adaptation to support new features like temporal or multi-agent planning. However, one of the limitations of POCL planners is that they require far more computational effort to deal with the interactions that arise among actions. FLAP2 minimizes this overhead by applying several techniques that improve its performance: the combination of different state-based heuristics and the use of parallel processes to diversify the search in different directions when a plateau is found. To evaluate the performance of FLAP2, we have made a comparison with four state-of-the-art planners: SGPlan, YAHSP2, Temporal Fast Downward and OPTIC. Experimental results show that FLAP2 presents a very acceptable trade-off between time and quality and a high coverage on the current planning benchmarks.
  • 加载中
  • Benton J., Coles A. & Coles A. 2012. Temporal planning with preferences and time-dependent continuous costs. In International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), 2–10.

    Google Scholar

    Chen Y., Wah B. & Hsu C. 2006. Temporal planning using subgoal partitioning and resolution in SGPlan. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 26, 323–369.

    Google Scholar

    Coles A., Coles A., Fox M. & Long D. 2010. Forward-chaining partial-order planning. In International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), 42–49.

    Google Scholar

    Domshlak C., Karpas E. & Markovitch S. 2010. To max or not to max: online learning for speeding up optimal planning. In AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.

    Google Scholar

    Eyerich P. 2012. Preferring properly: increasing coverage while maintaining quality in anytime temporal planning. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 312–317.

    Google Scholar

    Eyerich P., Mattmüller R. & Röger G. 2009. Using the context-enhanced additive heuristic for temporal and numeric planning. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS).

    Google Scholar

    Helmert M. 2004. A planning heuristic based on causal graph analysis. In International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), 161–170.

    Google Scholar

    Helmert M. 2006. The fast downward planning system. Journal of Articial Intelligence Research 26, 191–246.

    Google Scholar

    Helmert M., Haslum P., Hoffmann J. & Nissim R. 2013. Merge & shrink abstraction: a method for generating lower bounds in factored state spaces. Journal of the ACM 61, 1–16:63.

    Google Scholar

    Helmert M., Röger G. & Karpas E. 2011. Fast downward stone soup: a baseline for building planner portfolios. In Proceedings of the ICAPS-2011 Workshop on Planning and Learning (PAL), 28–35.

    Google Scholar

    Hoffmann J. 2002. Extending FF to numerical state variables. In Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 571–575.

    Google Scholar

    Hoffman J. & Nebel B. 2001. The FF planning system: fast planning generation through heuristic search. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 14, 253–302.

    Google Scholar

    Hoffmann J., Porteous J. & Sebastia L. 2004. Ordered landmarks in planning. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 22, 215–278.

    Google Scholar

    Keyder E. & Geffner H. 2008. Heuristics for planning with action costs revisited. In European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), 588–592.

    Google Scholar

    Khouadjia M., Schoenauer M., Vidal V., Dréo J. & Savéant P. 2013. Multi-objective AI planning: comparing aggregation and pareto approaches. In Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on Evolutionary Computation in Combinatorial Optimization (EvoCOP), 7832: 202–213.

    Google Scholar

    Kvarnström J. 2011. Planning for loosely coupled agents using partial order forward-chaining. International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), 138–145.

    Google Scholar

    Lipovetzky N. & Geffner H. 2009. Inference and decomposition in planning using causal consistent chains. Proceedings of the Nineteenth International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling (ICAPS), 217–224.

    Google Scholar

    Richter S. & Westphal M. 2010. The LAMA planner: guiding cost-based anytime planning with landmarks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 29(1), 127–177.

    Google Scholar

    Russell S. J. & Norvig P. 2009. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edition. Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar

    Sapena O., Onaindía E. & Torreño A. 2015. FLAP: applying least-commitment in forward-chaining planning. AI Communications 28(1), 5–20.

    Google Scholar

    Sebastia L., Onaindía E. & Marzal E. 2006. Decomposition of planning problems. AI Communications 19(1), 49–81.

    Google Scholar

    Torreño A., Onaindía E. & Sapena O. 2014. FMAP: distributed cooperative multi-agent planning. Applied Intelligence 41(2), 606–626.

    Google Scholar

    Vidal V. 2003. A lookahead strategy for solving large planning problems. In Proceedings of the 18th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 1524–1525.

    Google Scholar

    Vidal V. 2011. YAHSP2: keep it simple, stupid. In Proceedings of the 7th International Planning Competition (IPC-2011), 83–90.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Oscar Sapena, Alejandro Torreño, Eva Onaindía. 2016. Parallel heuristic search in forward partial-order planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 31(5)417−428, doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000230
    Oscar Sapena, Alejandro Torreño, Eva Onaindía. 2016. Parallel heuristic search in forward partial-order planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 31(5)417−428, doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000230

Article Metrics

Article views(29) PDF downloads(40)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Parallel heuristic search in forward partial-order planning

The Knowledge Engineering Review  31 2016, 31(5): 417−428  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: Most of the current top-performing planners are sequential planners that only handle total-order plans. Although this is a computationally efficient approach, the management of total-order plans restrict the choices of reasoning and thus the generation of flexible plans. In this paper, we present FLAP2, a forward-chaining planner that follows the principles of the classical POCL (Partial-Order Causal-Link Planning) paradigm. Working with partial-order plans allows FLAP2 to easily manage the parallelism of the plans, which brings several advantages: more flexible executions, shorter plan durations (makespan) and an easy adaptation to support new features like temporal or multi-agent planning. However, one of the limitations of POCL planners is that they require far more computational effort to deal with the interactions that arise among actions. FLAP2 minimizes this overhead by applying several techniques that improve its performance: the combination of different state-based heuristics and the use of parallel processes to diversify the search in different directions when a plateau is found. To evaluate the performance of FLAP2, we have made a comparison with four state-of-the-art planners: SGPlan, YAHSP2, Temporal Fast Downward and OPTIC. Experimental results show that FLAP2 presents a very acceptable trade-off between time and quality and a high coverage on the current planning benchmarks.

    • This work has been partially supported by the Spanish MINECO project TIN2014-55637-C2-2-R and cofounded by FEDER.

    • http://www.plg.inf.uc3m.es/ipc2011-deterministic

    • http://ipc.informatik.uni-freiburg.de/

    • © Cambridge University Press, 2016 2016Cambridge University Press
References (24)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Oscar Sapena, Alejandro Torreño, Eva Onaindía. 2016. Parallel heuristic search in forward partial-order planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 31(5)417−428, doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000230
    Oscar Sapena, Alejandro Torreño, Eva Onaindía. 2016. Parallel heuristic search in forward partial-order planning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 31(5)417−428, doi: 10.1017/S0269888916000230
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return