School of Computer Science, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UB, UK"/> Centre for Advanced Spatial Analysis, University College London, London W1T 4TJ, UK"/> School of Computing, Engineering & Intelligent Systems, Ulster University, Derry/Londonderry BT48 7JL, UK"/> School of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1TW, UK"/> Institute for Mathematical Innovation, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK"/> School of Mathematics, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4AG, UK"/> School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK"/> School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK"/> Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK"/> Department of Mathematical Sciences, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, UK"/> Department of Computer Science, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4QF, UK"/>
Search
2024 Volume 39
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Artificial intelligence for collective intelligence: a national-scale research strategy

More Information
  • Abstract: Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have great potential to help address societal challenges that are both collective in nature and present at national or transnational scale. Pressing challenges in healthcare, finance, infrastructure and sustainability, for instance, might all be productively addressed by leveraging and amplifying AI for national-scale collective intelligence. The development and deployment of this kind of AI faces distinctive challenges, both technical and socio-technical. Here, a research strategy for mobilising inter-disciplinary research to address these challenges is detailed and some of the key issues that must be faced are outlined.
  • 加载中
  • Aarestrup , F., Albeyatti , A., Armitage , W., Auffray , C., Augello , L., Balling , R., Benhabiles , N., Bertolini , G., Bjaalie , J., Black , M., Blomberg , N., Bogaert , P., Bubak , M., Claerhout , B., Clarke , L., De Meulder , B., D’Errico , G., Di Meglio , A., Forgo , N., Gans-Combe , C., Gray , A., Gut , I., Gyllenberg , A., Hemmrich-Stanisak , G., Hjorth , L., Ioannidis , Y., Jarmalaite , S., Kel , A., Kherif , F., Korbel , J., Larue , C., László , M., Maas , A., Magalhaes , L., Manneh-Vangramberen , I., Morley-Fletcher , E., Ohmann , C., Oksvold , P., Oxtoby , N., Perseil , I., Pezoulas , V., Riess , O., Riper , H., Roca , J., Rosenstiel , P., Sabatier , P., Sanz , F., Tayeb , M., Thomassen , G., Van Bussel , J., Van Den Bulcke , M. & Van Oyen , H. 2020. Towards a European Health Research and Innovation Cloud (HRIC). Genome Medicine 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-020-0713-z.

    Google Scholar

    Acar , O. A. 2023. Crowd science and science skepticism. Collective Intelligence 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/263391372311764.

    Google Scholar

    Achten , W. M. J., Almeida , J. & Muys , B. 2013. Carbon footprint of science: More than flying. Ecological Indicators 34, 352–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.05.025.

    Google Scholar

    Ajmeri , N., Guo , H., Murukannaiah , P. K. & Singh , M. P. 2018. Robust norm emergence by revealing and reasoning about context: Socially intelligent agents for enhancing privacy. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), 28–34, IJCAI. https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2018/4.

    Google Scholar

    Al-Shargie , F., Tariq , U., Mir , H., Alawar , H., Babiloni , F. & Al-Nashash , H. 2019. Vigilance decrement and enhancement techniques: A review. Brain Sciences 9(8), 178–203. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci9080178.

    Google Scholar

    An , L., Grimm , V., Bai , Y., Sullivan , A., Turner II, B., Malleson, N., Heppenstall, A., Vincenot, C., Robinson, D., Ye, X., Liu, J., Lindkvist, E. & Tang, W. 2023. Modeling agent decision and behavior in the light of data science and artificial intelligence. Environmental Modelling & Software 166, 105713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105713.

    Google Scholar

    Andras , P., Esterle , L., Guckert , M., Han , T. A., Lewis , P. R., Milanovic , K., Payne , T., Perret , C., Pitt , J., Powers , S. T., Urquhart , N. & Wells , S. 2018. Trusting intelligent machines: Deepening trust within socio-technical systems. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 37(4), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2018.2876107.

    Google Scholar

    Arner, D. W., Barberis, J. & Buckley, R. P. 2015. The evolution of FinTech: A new post-crisis paradigm?, Technical Report 2015/047, Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, Faculty of Law. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2676553.

    Google Scholar

    Batty , M. 2024. AI and design. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science 51, 23998083241236619. https://doi.org/10.1177/239980832412366.

    Google Scholar

    Batty , M., Clifton , J., Tyler , P. & Wan , L. 2020. The post-Covid city. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 15(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsac041.

    Google Scholar

    Batty , M., Crooks , A. T., See , L. M. & Heppenstall , A. J. 2012. Perspectives on agent-based models and geographical systems. In Agent-Based Models of Geographical Systems, Heppenstall , A. J., Crooks , A. T., See , L. M. & Batty , M. (eds), 1–15. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8927-4.

    Google Scholar

    Baxter , G. & Sommerville , I. 2011. Socio-technical systems: From design methods to systems engineering. Interacting with Computers 23(1), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2010.07.003.

    Google Scholar

    Bazarbash , M. 2019. FinTech in financial inclusion: Machine learning applications in assessing credit risk, Technical Report 2019/109, International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781498314428.001.

    Google Scholar

    Behera , C., Condell , J., Dora , S., Gibson , D. & Leavey , G. 2021. State-of-the-art sensors for remote care of people with dementia during a pandemic: A systematic review. Sensors 21(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/s21144688.

    Google Scholar

    Benton , M., Cleal , B., Prina , M., Baykoca , J., Willaing , I., Price , H. & Ismail , K. 2023. Prevalence of mental disorders in people living with type 1 diabetes: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. General Hospital Psychiatry 80, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.11.004.

    Google Scholar

    Berditchevskaia , A. & Baeck , P. 2020. The Future of Minds and Machines: How Artifical Intelligence can Enhance Collective Intelligence. NESTA. https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/future-minds-and-machines.

    Google Scholar

    Berditchevskaia , A., Maliaraki , E. & Stathoulopoulos , K. 2022. A descriptive analysis of collective intelligence publications since 2000, and the emerging influence of artificial intelligence. Collective Intelligence 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221107924.

    Google Scholar

    Black , M., Wallace , J., Rankin , D., Carlin , P., Bond , R., Mulvenna , M., Cleland , B., Fischaber , S., Epelde , G., Nikolic , G., Pajula , J. & Connolly , R. 2019. Meaningful integration of data, analytics and services of computer-based medical systems: The MIDAS touch. In Proceedings of the 32nd IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems (CBMS), 104–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/CBMS.2019.00031.

    Google Scholar

    Bonabeau , E., Dorigo , M. & Theraulaz , G. 1999. Swarm Intelligence: From Natural to Artificial Systems. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195131581.001.0001.

    Google Scholar

    Börner , K., Sanyal , S. & Vespignani , A. 2007. Network science. In Annual Review of Information Science & Technology, Cronin, B. (ed.), 537–607. Information Today Inc./American Society for Information Science and Technology, chapter 12.

    Google Scholar

    Bourazeri , A. & Pitt , J. 2018. Collective attention and active consumer participation in community energy systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.06.001.

    Google Scholar

    Bratteteig , T., Bødker , K., Dittrich , Y., Mogensen , P. H. & Simonsen , J. 2012. Methods: Organising principles and general guidelines for participatory design projects. In Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, Simonsen , J. & Robertson , T. (eds), 117–144. Routledge.

    Google Scholar

    Brooks-Pollock , E., Danon , L., Jombart , T. & Pellis , L. 2021. Modelling that shaped the early COVID-19 pandemic response in the UK. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 376(1829), 3762021000120210001. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2021.0001.

    Google Scholar

    Bryson , J. 2018. AI & global governance: No one should trust AI, Blog Post, United Nations University Centre for Policy Research.

    Google Scholar

    Buckle , M., Chen , J., Guo , Q. & Li , X. 2023. Does smile help detect the UK’s price leadership change after MiFID?. International Review of Economics & Finance 84, 756–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2022.11.033.

    Google Scholar

    Bullock , S. & Sayama , H. 2023. Agent heterogeneity mediates extremism in an adaptive social network model. In Proceedings of the Artificial Life Conference 2023 (ALIFE 2023), Iizuka , H., Suzuki , K., Uno , R., Damiano , L., Spychalav , N., Aguilera , M., Izquierdo , E., Suzuki , R. & Baltieri , M. (eds). MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.1162/isal_a_00628.

    Google Scholar

    Cao , H., Wachowicz , M., Richard , R. & Hsu , C.-H. 2023. Fostering new vertical and horizontal IoT applications with intelligence everywhere. Collective Intelligence 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231208966.

    Google Scholar

    Cartlidge , J., Szostek , C., Luca , M. D. & Cliff , D. 2012. Too fast too furious: Faster financial-market trading agents can give less efficient markets. In Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Agents and Artificial Intelligence (ICAART), Filipe , J. & Fred , A. L. N. (eds), 126–135. SciTePress. https://doi.org/10.5220/0003720301260135.

    Google Scholar

    Challen , R., Denny , J., Pitt , M., Gompels , L., Edwards , T. & Tsaneva-Atanasova , K. 2019. Artificial intelligence, bias and clinical safety. BMJ Quality & Safety 28(3), 231–237. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-008370.

    Google Scholar

    Challen , R., Tsaneva-Atanasova , K., Pitt , M., Edwards , T., Gompels , L., Lacasa , L., Brooks-Pollock , E. & Danon , L. 2021. Estimates of regional infectivity of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom following imposition of social distancing measures. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B 376(1829), 3762020028020200280. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2020.0280.

    Google Scholar

    Chen , C. & Campbell , N. D. F. 2022. Analysing training-data leakage from gradients through linear systems and gradient matching. In The 33rd British Machine Vision Conference (BMVC 2022). BMVA Press.

    Google Scholar

    Chen , C., Namboodiri , V. P. & Padget , J. 2023. Understanding the vulnerability of CLIP to image compression. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Robustness of Few-shot and Zero-shot Learning in Foundation Models (NeurIPS 2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.14029.

    Google Scholar

    Chiou , E. K. & Lee , J. D. 2023. Trusting automation: Designing for responsivity and resilience. Human Factors 65(1), 137–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/00187208211009.

    Google Scholar

    Choung , H., David , P. & Ross , A. 2023. Trust in AI and its role in the acceptance of AI technologies. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 39(9), 1727–1739. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2050543.

    Google Scholar

    Dambanemuya , H. K., Wachs , J. & Ágnes Horvát , E. 2023. Understanding (ir)rational herding online. In Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference (CI), Bernstein , M., Savage , S. & Bozzon , A. (eds), 79–88. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615598.

    Google Scholar

    Duckworth , C., Guy , M. J., Kumaran , A., O’Kane , A. A., Ayobi , A., Chapman , A., Marshall , P. & Boniface , M. 2024. Explainable machine learning for real-time hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia prediction and personalized control recommendations. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology 18(1), 113–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968221103561.

    Google Scholar

    Emanuel , E. J. & Wachter , R. M. 2019. Artificial intelligence in health care: Will the value match the hype? JAMA 321(23), 2281–2282. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.4914.

    Google Scholar

    Gilbert , N. & Bullock , S. 2014. Complexity at the social science interface. Complexity 19(6), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/cplx.21550.

    Google Scholar

    Góis , A. R., Santos , F. P., Pacheco , J. M. & Santos , F. C. 2019. Reward and punishment in climate change dilemmas. Scientific Reports 9(1), 16193. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-52524-8.

    Google Scholar

    Goodwin , T. 2012. Why we should reject ‘nudge’. Politics 32(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01430.x.

    Google Scholar

    Greeno , J. G. 1994. Gibson’s affordances. Psychological Review 101(2), 336–342. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.2.336.

    Google Scholar

    Haapalainen , E., Kim , S., Forlizzi , J. F. & Dey , A. K. 2010. Psycho-physiological measures for assessing cognitive load. In Proceedings of the 12th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp’10), 301–310. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/1864349.1864395.

    Google Scholar

    Hart , S., Banks , V., Bullock , S. & Noyes , J. 2022. Understanding human decision-making when controlling UAVs in a search and rescue application. In Human Interaction & Emerging Technologies (IHIET 2022): Artificial Intelligence & Future Applications. AHFE (2022) International Conference, Ahram , T. & Taiar , R. (eds). AHFE Open Access, 68. AHFE International. http://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1002768.

    Google Scholar

    Henderson , J., Condell , J., Connolly , J., Kelly , D. & Curran , K. 2021. Review of wearable sensor-based health monitoring glove devices for rheumatoid arthritis. Sensors 21(5), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21051576.

    Google Scholar

    Jacyno , M., Bullock , S., Luck , M. & Payne , T. R. 2009. Emergent service provisioning and demand estimation through self-organizing agent communities. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), Sierra , C., Castelfranchi , C., Decker , K. S. & Sichman , J. S. (eds), 481–488. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/1558013.1558079.

    Google Scholar

    Johnson , N., Zhao , G., Hunsader , E., Qi , H., Johnson , N., Meng , J. & Tivnan , B. 2013. Abrupt rise of new machine ecology beyond human response time. Scientific Reports 3(1), 2627. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02627.

    Google Scholar

    Klein , T. 2022. A note on GameStop, short squeezes, and autodidactic herding: An evolution in financial literacy?. Finance Research Letters 46, 102229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102229.

    Google Scholar

    Koldunov , N. & Jung , T. 2024. Local climate services for all, courtesy of large language models. Communications Earth & Environment 5(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01199-1.

    Google Scholar

    Kotek , H., Dockum , R. & Sun , D. Q. 2023. Gender bias and stereotypes in large language models. In Proceedings of The ACM Collective Intelligence Conference (CI), Bernstein , M., Savage , S. & Bozzon , A. (eds), 12–24. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3582269.3615599.

    Google Scholar

    Kulkarni , P., Mahabaleshwarkar , A., Kulkarni , M., Sirsikar , N. & Gadgil , K. 2019. Conversational AI: An overview of methodologies, applications & future scope. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference On Computing, Communication, Control And Automation (ICCUBEA), 1–7. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCUBEA47591.2019.

    Google Scholar

    Lee , J. D. & See , K. A. 2004. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46(1), 50–80. https://doi.org/10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.

    Google Scholar

    Leonard , N. E. & Levin , S. A. 2022. Collective intelligence as a public good. Collective Intelligence 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221083293.

    Google Scholar

    Liu , A., Jahanshahloo , H., Chen , J. & Eshraghi , A. 2023. Trading patterns in the bitcoin market. The European Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2023.2241883.

    Google Scholar

    Lwakatare , L. E., Raj , A., Crnkovic , I., Bosch , J. & Olsson , H. H. 2020. Large-scale machine learning systems in real-world industrial settings: A review of challenges and solutions. Information and Software Technology 127, 106368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2020.106368.

    Google Scholar

    Malleson , N., Birkin , M., Birks , D., Ge , J., Heppenstall , A., Manley , E., McCulloch , J. & Ternes , P. 2022. Agent-based modelling for urban analytics: State of the art and challenges. AI Communications 35(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIC-220114.

    Google Scholar

    Mann , R. P. 2022. Collective decision-making under changing social environments among agents adapted to sparse connectivity. Collective Intelligence 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221121347.

    Google Scholar

    Mesoudi , A. & Thornton , A. 2018. What is cumulative cultural evolution?. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 285(1880), 20180712. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0712.

    Google Scholar

    Messeri , L. & Crockett , M. J. 2024. Artificial intelligence and illusions of understanding in scientific research. Nature 627(8002), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-024-07146-0.

    Google Scholar

    Murukannaiah , P. K., Ajmeri , N., Jonker , C. M. & Singh , M. P. 2020. New foundations of ethical multiagent systems. In Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), 1706–1710. IFAAMAS. https://doi.org/10.5555/3398761.3398958.

    Google Scholar

    NHS 2019. The NHS long term plan. NHS. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/publication/nhs-long-term-plan/.

    Google Scholar

    Ostrom , E. 2010. Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. Transnational Corporations Review 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2010.11658229.

    Google Scholar

    Owen , R., Stilgoe , J., Macnaghten , P., Gorman , M., Fisher , E., Guston , D. & Bessant , J. 2013. A framework for responsible innovation. In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, 27–50. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118551424.ch2.

    Google Scholar

    Patterson , D. A., Gonzalez , J., Le , Q. V., Liang , C., Munguia , L., Rothchild , D., So , D. R., Texier , M. & Dean , J. 2021. Carbon emissions and large neural network training. Pre-print. arXiv:2104.10350. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.10350.

    Google Scholar

    Pitonakova , L., Crowder , R. & Bullock , S. 2018. The Information-Cost-Reward framework for understanding robot swarm foraging. Swarm Intelligence 12(1), 71–96. 10.1007/s11721-017-0148-3. doi: 10.1007/s11721-017-0148-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    Preist , C., Schien , D. & Shabajee , P. 2019. Evaluating sustainable interaction design of digital services: The case of YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–12. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300627.

    Google Scholar

    Radanliev , P., De Roure , D., Walton , R., Van Kleek , M., Montalvo , R. M., Santos , O., Maddox , L. & Cannady , S. 2020. COVID-19 what have we learned? The rise of social machines and connected devices in pandemic management following the concepts of predictive, preventive and personalized medicine. EPMA Journal 11(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13167-020-00218-x.

    Google Scholar

    Rajkomar , A., Dean , J. & Kohane , I. 2019. Machine learning in medicine. New England Journal of Medicine 380(14), 1347–1358. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1814259.

    Google Scholar

    Rashid , M. T., Wei , N. & Wang , D. 2023. A survey on social-physical sensing: An emerging sensing paradigm that explores the collective intelligence of humans and machines. Collective Intelligence 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231170825.

    Google Scholar

    Resnick , P. & Varian , H. R. 1997. Recommender systems. Communications of the ACM 40(3), 56–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/245108.245121.

    Google Scholar

    Scheffer, M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W. A., Brovkin, V., Carpenter, S. R., Dakos, V., Held, H., van Nes, E. H., Rietkerk, M. & Sugihara, G. 2009. Early-warning signals for critical transitions. Nature 461, 53–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08227.

    Google Scholar

    Shi , X., Nikolic , G., Fischaber , S., Black , M., Rankin , D., Epelde , G., Beristain , A., Alvarez , R., Arrue , M., Pita Costa , J., Grobelnik , M., Stopar , L., Pajula , J., Umer , A., Poliwoda , P., Wallace , J., Carlin , P., Pääkkönen , J. & De Moor , B. 2022. System architecture of a European platform for health policy decision making: MIDAS. Frontiers in Public Health 10, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.838438.

    Google Scholar

    Shi , Z. & Cartlidge , J. 2022. State dependent parallel neural Hawkes process for limit order book event stream prediction and simulation. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), Washington DC, 1607–1615. https://doi.org/10.1145/3534678.3539462.

    Google Scholar

    Shi , Z. & Cartlidge , J. 2024. Neural stochastic agent-based limit order book simulation with neural point process and diffusion probabilistic model. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1553.

    Google Scholar

    Smaldino , P. E. 2014. The cultural evolution of emergent group-level traits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 37, 243–295. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X13001544.

    Google Scholar

    Smaldino , P. E. & O’Connor , C. 2022. Interdisciplinarity can aid the spread of better methods between scientific communities. Collective Intelligence 1(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137221131816.

    Google Scholar

    Smith , L. G. E., Blackwood , L. & Thomas , E. F. 2020. The need to refocus on the group as the site of radicalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science 15(2), 327–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619885870.

    Google Scholar

    Spooner , F., Abrams , J. F., Morrissey , K., Shaddick , G., Batty , M., Milton , R., Dennett , A., Lomax , N., Malleson , N., Nelissen , N., Coleman , A., Nur , J., Jin , Y., Greig , R., Shenton , C. & Birkin , M. 2021. A dynamic microsimulation model for epidemics. Social Science & Medicine 291, 114461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114461.

    Google Scholar

    Stanton , N. A. 2006. Hierarchical task analysis: Developments, applications, and extensions. Applied Ergonomics 37(1), 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2005.06.003.

    Google Scholar

    Stawarz , K., Katz , D., Ayobi , A., Marshall , P., Yamagata , T., Santos-Rodriguez , R., Flach , P. & O’Kane , A. A. 2023. Co-designing opportunities for human-centred machine learning in supporting type 1 diabetes decision-making. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 173, 103003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2023.103003.

    Google Scholar

    Stilgoe , J., Owen , R. & Macnaghten , P. 2020. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. In The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy, Andrew Maynard, J. S. (ed.). Routledge, 347–359. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003075028-22.

    Google Scholar

    Tedesco , S., Andrulli , M., Larsson , M. A., Kelly , D., Timmons , S., Alamäki , A., Barton , J., Condell , J., O’Flynn , B. & Nordström , A. 2021. Investigation of the analysis of wearable data for cancer-specific mortality prediction in older adults. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), Virtual, 1848–1851. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC46164.2021.9630370.

    Google Scholar

    Tilman , A. R., Vasconcelos , V. V., Akçay , E. & Plotkin , J. B. 2023. The evolution of forecasting for decision-making in dynamic environments. Collective Intelligence 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231221726.

    Google Scholar

    Topol , E. 2019. The Topol Review: Preparing the healthcare workforce to deliver the digital future, Technical report, An independent report on behalf of the UK Government’s Secretary of State for Health and Social Care. https://topol.hee.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/HEE-Topol-Review-2019.pdf.

    Google Scholar

    Treen , K. M. d., Williams, H. T. P. & O’Neill, S. J. 2020. Online misinformation about climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 11(5), e665. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.665.

    Google Scholar

    UN AI Advisory Body 2024. Governing AI for Humanity, Final Report, United Nations.

    Google Scholar

    Vaghefi , S. A., Stammbach , D., Muccione , V., Bingler , J., Ni , J., Kraus , M., Allen , S., Colesanti-Senni , C., Wekhof , T., Schimanski , T. et al. 2023. ChatClimate: Grounding conversational AI in climate science. Communications Earth & Environment 4(1), 480. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-023-01084-x.

    Google Scholar

    van Thiel , D. & Elliott , K. 2024. Responsible access to credit for sole-traders and micro-organisations under unstable market conditions with psychometrics. The European Journal of Finance. Forthcoming. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2024.2357569.

    Google Scholar

    Van Veenstra , A. F., van Zoonen , E. A. & Helberger , N. 2021. ELSA labs for human centric innovation in AI. Netherlands AI Coalition. https://nlaic.com/en/bouwsteen/human-centric-ai/elsa-concept/.

    Google Scholar

    Vinitsky , E., Köster , R., Agapiou , J. P., Duéñez-Guzmán , E. A., Vezhnevets , A. S. & Leibo , J. Z. 2023. A learning agent that acquires social norms from public sanctions in decentralized multi-agent settings. Collective Intelligence 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/26339137231162025.

    Google Scholar

    Wang , C., Boerman , S. C., Kroon , A. C., Möller , J. & de Vreese , C. H. 2024. The artificial intelligence divide: Who is the most vulnerable?. New Media & Society 26, 14614448241232345. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241232345.

    Google Scholar

    Whitney , C. D. & Norman , J. 2024. Real risks of fake data: Synthetic data, diversity-washing and consent circumvention. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAccT’24, 1733–1744. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659002.

    Google Scholar

    Woodgate , J. & Ajmeri , N. 2022. Macro ethics for governing equitable sociotechnical systems. In Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), IFAAMAS, Online, 1824–1828. https://doi.org/10.5555/3535850.3536118.

    Google Scholar

    Woodgate , J. & Ajmeri , N. 2024. Macro ethics principles for responsible AI systems: Taxonomy and directions. ACM Computing Surveys 56(11), 1–37.

    Google Scholar

    You , Z., Zhang , P., Zheng , J. & Cartlidge , J. 2024. Multi-relational graph diffusion neural network with parallel retention for stock trends classification. In Proceedings of the 49th IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icassp48485.2024.10447394.

    Google Scholar

    Young , E., Wajcman , J. & Sprejer , L. 2021. Where are the women? Mapping the gender job gap in AI, Policy briefing: Full report, The Alan Turing Institute, UK.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang , J., Wen , J. & Chen , J. 2023. Modelling market fluctuations under investor sentiment with a Hawkes-contact process. The European Journal of Finance 29(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1351847X.2021.1957699.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang , Q., Wallbridge , C. D., Jones , D. M. & Morgan , P. L. 2024. Public perception of autonomous vehicle capability determines judgment of blame and trust in road traffic accidents. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 179, 103887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2023.103887.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang , T., Yang , J., Liang , N., Pitts , B. J., Prakah-Asante , K., Curry , R., Duerstock , B., Wachs , J. P. & Yu , D. 2023. Physiological measurements of situation awareness: A systematic review. Human Factors 65(5), 737–758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720820969071.

    Google Scholar

    Zhang , Y., Chapple , K., Cao , M., Dennett , A. & Smith , D. 2020. Visualising urban gentrification and displacement in Greater London. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 52(5), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19880211.

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Seth Bullock, Nirav Ajmeri, Mike Batty, Michaela Black, John Cartlidge, Robert Challen, Cangxiong Chen, Jing Chen, Joan Condell, Leon Danon, Adam Dennett, Alison Heppenstall, Paul Marshall, Phil Morgan, Aisling O’Kane, Laura G. E. Smith, Theresa Smith, Hywel T. P. Williams. 2024. Artificial intelligence for collective intelligence: a national-scale research strategy. The Knowledge Engineering Review 39(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888924000110
    Seth Bullock, Nirav Ajmeri, Mike Batty, Michaela Black, John Cartlidge, Robert Challen, Cangxiong Chen, Jing Chen, Joan Condell, Leon Danon, Adam Dennett, Alison Heppenstall, Paul Marshall, Phil Morgan, Aisling O’Kane, Laura G. E. Smith, Theresa Smith, Hywel T. P. Williams. 2024. Artificial intelligence for collective intelligence: a national-scale research strategy. The Knowledge Engineering Review 39(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888924000110

Article Metrics

Article views(141) PDF downloads(405)

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Artificial intelligence for collective intelligence: a national-scale research strategy

Abstract: Abstract: Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have great potential to help address societal challenges that are both collective in nature and present at national or transnational scale. Pressing challenges in healthcare, finance, infrastructure and sustainability, for instance, might all be productively addressed by leveraging and amplifying AI for national-scale collective intelligence. The development and deployment of this kind of AI faces distinctive challenges, both technical and socio-technical. Here, a research strategy for mobilising inter-disciplinary research to address these challenges is detailed and some of the key issues that must be faced are outlined.

    • This work was supported by UKRI EPSRC Grant No. EP/Y028392/1: AI for Collective Intelligence (AI4CI).

    • https://ai4ci.ac.uk.

    • https://www.gov.uk/government/news/bristol-set-to-host-uks-most-powerful-supercomputer-to-turbocharge-ai-innovation.

    • https://www.ukri.org/opportunity/host-sites-for-the-next-wave-of-uk-government-ai-infrastructure; N.B. this investment in hardware was subsequently withdrawn by the UK’s incoming Labour government: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cyx5x44vnyeo.

    • https://www.ukri.org/what-we-do/how-we-work-in-ai/ukri-artificial-intelligence-centres-for-doctoral-training.

    • https://www.ukri.org/opportunity/artificial-intelligence-research-to-enable-uks-net-zero-target.

    • https://www.ukri.org/news/13-million-for-22-ai-for-health-research-projects.

    • https://www.ukri.org/news/54m-to-develop-secure-ai-that-can-help-solve-major-challenges.

    • https://www.ukri.org/news/100m-boost-in-ai-research-will-propel-transformative-innovations.

    • https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/future-minds-and-machines.

    • This characterisation of collective intelligence is strongly aligned with approaches developed within socio-technical systems research (Baxter & Sommerville, 2011).

    • ‘Planning for the future’, Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, UK Government, 2023, https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/planning-for-the-future/planning-for-the-future.

    • The term smart city is used here in two mutually reinforcing senses, first in the sense that novel smart technologies are physically incorporated into these cities, and second in the sense that these technologies underpin new kinds of ‘smart’ behavioural interactions within and across these cities at a range of different time scales (Batty et al., 2020).

    • For example, Data for Good: https://dataforgood.facebook.com; Smart Data Research: https://www.sdruk.ukri.org (formerly Digital Footprints); note the implicit challenges here related to (i) establishing and maintaining the public’s trust in, and engagement with, these potentially intrusive data collection efforts and (ii) countering the inevitable systematic biases that arise from unrepresentative sampling of the collective system as a whole.

    • https://www.gov.uk/government/news/ukhsa-publishes-investigation-findings-following-errors-at-the-private-immensa-lab.

    • For example, https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/research/approach/collaboration/ukcp, the UK Met Office’s Climate Projections dataset.

    • https://www.ipcc.ch/reports/.

    • https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-kalifa-review-of-uk-fintech.

    • https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/consumer-duty.

    • https://www.fca.org.uk/firms/innovation/digital-sandbox.

    • https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/.

    • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/assessment-list-trustworthy-artificial-intelligence-altai-self-assessment.

    • https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/ai-safety-institute-overview/introducing-the-ai-safety-institute.

    • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.

    • https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206.

    • https://www.flowminder.org/.

    • https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-security-and-investment-act-guidance-on-notifiable-acquisitions.

    • https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/research-collaboration-advice-team.

    • https://www.ey.com/en_us/consulting/businesses-can-stop-rising-ai-use-from-fueling-anxiety.

    • One theoretical framework with promising potential to support and inter-relate the challenges being considered here is that offered by studies in cumulative cultural evolution (Smaldino 2014; Mesoudi & Thornton 2018).

    • There is some debate as to whether notions of ‘trust’ and ‘trustworthiness’ are appropriate for framing the legitimacy of AI systems; compare, for example, the work of Andras et al. (2018) with the position of Bryson (2018). Even the use of a term like ‘guidance’ to describe the kind of support that AI systems might be designed to offer can be reminiscent of previous attempts to shift public behaviour through the ‘libertarian paternalism’ of nudge economics, an approach that was discredited precisely because of its tendency to disempower or even coerce people rather than fully inform or partner with them (Goodwin 2012).

    • https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.

    • https://ai4ci.ac.uk/themes/.

    • https://ai4ci.ac.uk/events/.

    • https://ai4ci.ac.uk/funding/.

    • https://www.nesta.org.uk/report/future-minds-and-machines/.

    • This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
References (99)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Seth Bullock, Nirav Ajmeri, Mike Batty, Michaela Black, John Cartlidge, Robert Challen, Cangxiong Chen, Jing Chen, Joan Condell, Leon Danon, Adam Dennett, Alison Heppenstall, Paul Marshall, Phil Morgan, Aisling O’Kane, Laura G. E. Smith, Theresa Smith, Hywel T. P. Williams. 2024. Artificial intelligence for collective intelligence: a national-scale research strategy. The Knowledge Engineering Review 39(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888924000110
    Seth Bullock, Nirav Ajmeri, Mike Batty, Michaela Black, John Cartlidge, Robert Challen, Cangxiong Chen, Jing Chen, Joan Condell, Leon Danon, Adam Dennett, Alison Heppenstall, Paul Marshall, Phil Morgan, Aisling O’Kane, Laura G. E. Smith, Theresa Smith, Hywel T. P. Williams. 2024. Artificial intelligence for collective intelligence: a national-scale research strategy. The Knowledge Engineering Review 39(1), doi: 10.1017/S0269888924000110
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return