Figures (4)  Tables (6)
    • Figure 1. 

      Temporal variation of environmental temperature and precipitation at the experimental sites.

    • Figure 2. 

      Diurnal variation of CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes for (a) CWIA, (b) CWEA, (c) EWIA, (d) NW. D1, D2 and D3 for CWIA were October 16, November 3 and December 9 with daily mean temperature ranging from 21.3 to 9.0 °C; D1, D2 and D3 for CWEA were September 4, September 7, and September 22 with temperatures ranging from 29.7 to 23.1 °C; D1, D2 and D3 for EWIA were September 21, September 22, and October 14 with temperatures ranging from 24.9 to 19.6 °C; D1, D2 and D3 for NW were November 4, November 20, and December 11 with temperatures ranging from 17.6 to 8.4 °C. GWP, the global warming potential.

    • Figure 3. 

      Seasonal GHG emission dynamics of (a) N2O, (b) CH4 and (c) CO2 fluxes for different wetlands. The management practices of drainage and flooding occurred only to the sites of CWIA, CWEA and EWIA.

    • Figure 4. 

      Dependence of CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes on feeding amount at the sites of (a) CWIA and (b) EWIA.

    • SitesOriginAreaWater tableLocationFeedForage contentYield
      (hm2)mLongitudeLatitudeTotal C
      (g kg−1)
      Total N
      (g kg−1)
      C/N*t ha−1 year−1
      NWA natural lake1,0003−930.67°117.52°NANANANA/
      EWIAWetland shifted to aquatic production532−430.64°117.46°Fed on forage from March to October127.12 ± 7.4177.85 ± 2.031.6:111.32
      CWEAPaddy converted constructed wetland with2130.73°117.58°Fed on wheat grain or grass or fertilizer irregularly5.00
      CWIAPaddy converted constructed wetlands with intensive aquaculture21−230.66°117.50°Fed on forage from April to October151.31 ± 2.8072.39 ± 1.292.1:17.50
      * C/N represented the carbon-nitrogen ratio.

      Table 1. 

      Basic information of the four experimental sites.

    • SitesCumulative emissionGHG emission intensity per kg product
      N2O-N (kg ha−1)CH4-C (kg ha−1)CO2-C (kg ha−1)N2O (g kg−1)CH4 (kg kg−1)Total (kg CO2-eq kg−1)
      CWIA1.06 ± 0.20457.08 ± 161.201,877.04 ± 527.950.220.103.25
      CWEA0.81 ± 0.1223.83 ± 7.801321.32 ± 91.110.250.011.21
      EWIA2.43 ± 0.201,360.27 ± 1552.982,246.79 ± 488.230.340.195.30
      NW1.12 ± 0.4238.29 ± 11.991,305.48 ± 216.63///
      /: represented no data. The values were presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

      Table 2. 

      Cumulative CO2, CH4 and N2O fluxes and yield-scaled GHG emission intensity for different wetland systems.

    • SitesGWPContributions (%)
      t CO2-eq ha−1 y−1N2OCH4CO2
      CWIA24.382%70%28%
      CWEA6.046%14%80%
      EWIA60.022%85%14%
      NW6.677%21%72%

      Table 3. 

      Global warming potentials and their contributions for different wetland systems.

    • SitespH$ {\text{NH}^+_4}{\text {-N}}$ (mg L−1)${\text{NO}^-_3}{\text {-N}} $ (mg L−1)${\text{NO}^-_2}{\text {-N}} $ (mg L−1)TN (g L−1)DOC (mg L−1)
      Water qualityCWIA7.52 ± 0.14a0.60 ± 0.35a0.57 ± 0.26b0.48 ± 0.51a1.93 ± 0.69ab24.99 ± 8.50ab
      CWEA7.39 ± 0.48a0.46 ± 0.33a0.36 ± 0.12b0.10 ± 0.16ab1.30 ± 0.52bc21.83 ± 7.67ab
      EWIA7.50 ± 0.28a0.66 ± 0.61a1.36 ± 0.56a0.36 ± 0.49ab2.07 ± 0.88a29.93 ± 8.92a
      NW7.57 ± 0.29a0.25 ± 0.20a0.28 ± 0.08b0.03 ± 0.03b0.66 ± 0.23c20.01 ± 7.71b
      SitespH$ {\text{NH}^+_4}{\text {-N}}\;{\rm{ (mg\; kg^{−1})}} $$ {\text{NO}^-_3}{\text {-N}}\;{\rm{ (mg\; kg^{−1})}} $SOM (g kg−1)TN (g kg−1)C/N
      Sediment qualityCWIA6.81 ± 0.13a36.67 ± 4.32b273.70 ± 185.08a39.69 ± 2.75ab2.95 ± 0.18ab7.81 ± 0.51ab
      CWEA6.22 ± 0.18b33.21 ± 6.39b54.57 ± 20.31a39.66 ± 4.16ab2.68 ± 0.19b8.58 ± 0.42a
      EWIA6.59 ± 0.29a203.22 ± 16.08a251.03 ± 263.67a44.00 ± 1.15a3.34 ± 0.06a7.46 ± 0.19b
      NW6.58 ± 0.14a27.86 ± 5.07b21.23 ± 5.10a35.78 ± 4.09b2.91 ± 0.47ab7.00 ± 0.73b
      TN, DOC, SOM and C/N represented total nitrogen, dissolved organic carbon, soil organic matter and carbon : nitrogen ratio, respectively.

      Table 4. 

      Water and sediment qualities at the four experimental sites.

    • ItemspHDOC${\text{NH}^+_4}{\text {-N}} $${\text{NO}^-_3}{\text {-N}} $${\text{NO}^-_2}{\text {-N}} $TNWater temperature
      CorrelationCH40.110.090.60**0.80**−0.170.130.46*
      N2O0.310.200.37*0.60**−0.220.100.55**
      CO20.28−0.110.70**0.54**−0.230.110.65**
      P valueCH40.5740.6330.0020.0000.3990.5170.014
      N2O0.1090.2990.0490.0010.2490.6050.003
      CO20.1440.5760.0000.0030.2460.5750.000
      * Significant at P < 0.05; ** Significant at P < 0.01.

      Table 5. 

      Correlation coefficients between GHGs emission and water parameters in all four wetlands.

    • LocationSourcesTime horizonWetland typesN2O fluxesCH4 fluxesCO2 fluxes
      μg m−2 h−1mg m−2 h−1mg m−2 h−1
      ChinaEast ChinaCurrent study13 monthsConstructed wetland for intensive aquaculture18.65 ± 20.486.92 ± 9.4177.23 ± 68.95
      Constructed wetland for extensive aquaculture14.08 ± 9.580.35 ± 0.4551.21 ± 40.97
      Enclosure wetland for intensive aquaculture41.89 ± 24.8320.60 ± 19.9090.34 ± 65.45
      Natural wetland19.50 ± 12.480.55 ± 0.4151.09 ± 33.48
      East ChinaLiu et al. (2016)12 monthsRice paddies110.50.71
      Crab-fish aquaculture48.10.37
      Southeastern ChinaYang et al. (2015)5 monthsShrimp pond10.7419.9520.78
      4 monthsShrimp-fish pond11.81.65−60.46
      Lab simulation of aquatic systemHu et al. (2014)2 monthsControl5,504 ± 1,2212,401 ± 343
      Treatment911 ± 4884,590 ± 546
      Overseas
      of Nature wetlands
      Yangtze estuarine, ChinaWang et al. (2009)12 monthsMarsh site2.06
      Bare tidal flat0.04
      East ChinaHan et al. (2013)3 monthsOpen river62.17 ± 2.1316.41 ± 3.06162.18 ± 10.55
      Canal111.74 ± 7.41175.94 ± 18.421,082.00 ± 90.53
      Reservoir50.99 ± 2.681.70 ± 0.1425.61 ± 4.08
      Northeast ChinaYang et al. (2013)3 monthsFreshwater marsh13.38.92394.5
      IndiaSelvam et al. (2014)24 h/1−8 hPonds11.93 ± 12.33123.02 ± 117.33
      Rivers4.13 ± 8.2736.85 ± 70.58
      Reservoirs2.13 ± 2.3315.40 ± 35.75
      ColombiaDennis et al. (2014)11 monthsRestored mangrove162 ± 483.47 ± 1.52
      97 ± 4611.78 ± 10.54
      747 ± 2996.12 ± 9.69
      Costa RicaNahlik et al. (2011)29 monthsForested marsh5.05
      Rainforest swamp33.39
      Alluvial marsh39.94
      AustraliaAllen et al. (2011)6 monthsMangrove30.000.30
      Orinoco River Floodplain, VenezuelaSmith et al. (2000)17 monthsOpen river1.33
      Flooded forest4.67
      Macrophyte mats1.33

      Table 6. 

      Comparison of greenhouse gases fluxes from different wetland types with previous studies in China and other regions.