Figures (6)  Tables (4)
    • Figure 1. 

      The effect of 'genotype × phenological phase' on proline content.

    • Figure 2. 

      The effect of 'genotype × chilling × phenological stage' on proline content.

    • Figure 3. 

      The effect of chilling on electrolyte leakage (EL).

    • Figure 4. 

      The effect of 'genotype × chilling × phenological phase' on electrolyte leakage (EL).

    • Figure 5. 

      The effect of chilling on EC.

    • Figure 6. 

      The effect of 'genotype × chilling × phenological stage' on EC.

    • Sources of variationsdfMeans of squares
      Proline contentElectrolyte leakageEC
      Replication288.74**89.39ns32.14ns
      Genotype (A)219.48ns71.32ns117.79ns
      Chilling (B)121.37ns234.04*284.97*
      AB229.13ns138.85*461.82**
      Phenological phase (C)2369.23**6673.85**7819.65**
      AC440.96*26.31*115.24ns
      BC210.59ns143.87*285.73*
      ABC465.57**85.79+464.13**
      Error3414.4233.5959.83
      ns: insignificant difference; **: significant difference at 0.01; *: significant difference at 0.05; +: significant difference at 0.10.

      Table 1. 

      Analysis of variance for the effect of experimental factors on proline content.

    • TreatmentProline
      (μmol/g FW)
      Electrolyte
      leakage (%)
      EC
      (μS/cm)
      Bud dormancy6.52 b2.54 b0.1 b
      Bud swelling14.66 a34.64 a36.23 a
      Anthesis7.15 b0.16 b0.16 b
      Similar letters in each column shows insignificant differences at the p < 0.05 level.

      Table 2. 

      Means comparison for the effect of phenological stage on the studied traits.

    • TreatmentIon leakage
      (%)
      EC
      (μS/cm)
      4 °C × bud dormancy1.60 c0.10 c
      4 °C × bud swelling29.34 b29.33 b
      4 °C × anthesis0.16 c0.16 c
      -16 °C × bud dormancy3.48 c0.11 c
      -16 °C × bud swelling39.94 a43.13 a
      -16 °C × anthesis0.16 c0.15 c
      Similar letters in each column shows insignificant differences at the p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 levels.

      Table 3. 

      Means comparison for the effect of 'chilling × phenological phase' on the studied traits.

    • TreatmentIon leakage
      (%)
      EC
      (μS/cm)
      Date-plum × 4 °C9.92 b8.68 b
      Date-plum × -16 °C19.56 a19.80 a
      Kaki Fuyu × 4 °C12.15 b12.84 ab
      Kaki Fuyu × -16 °C10.68 b5.77 b
      Japanese × 4 °C9.02 b8.07 b
      Japanese × -16 °C13.35 b17.82 a
      Similar letter(s) in each column shows insignificance differences at the p < 0.01 and p < 0.05 levels.

      Table 4. 

      Means comparison for the effect of 'genotype × chilling' on the studied traits.