-
Figure 1.
FT-IR spectra of (a) untreated starch & Leuc. citreum SJ-57 adhered starch and (b) untreated Leuc. citreum SJ-57 & starch-adhered Leuc. citreum SJ-57. (c) The effect of different metal ion concentrations and types on Leuc. citreum SJ-57's FR, (d) the zeta potential of starch, and (e) the zeta potential of bacteria. (f) Effects of chemical treatments on Leuc. citreum SJ-57's FR: The floc were formed in 0.01 mol/L KCl (I), 0.01 mol/L KCl and 0.01 mol/L HCl (II), 0.01 mol/L KCl and 5 mol/L urea (III), 0.01 mol/L CaCl2 (IV), and 0.01 mol/L CaCl2 and 0.01 mol/L EDTA (V). Statistical analysis of differences between FRs with cells after various treatments performed using t-test. * represents p < 0.05.
-
Figure 2.
Total long-range interaction energy (Tot) and the individual partial interaction profiles between (a) Leuc. citreum SJ-57 and starch, (b) Leuc. citreum SJ-57 and Leuc. citreum SJ-57, (c) starch and starch, in 0.01 mol/L KCl solution at pH = 7 calculated by DLVO theory. FT-IR spectra of (d) untreated Leuc. SJ-57 and (e) starch in 0−10 mmol/L KCl solution. (f) Changes in the equivalent diameter of strains and starch in 0−10 mmol/L KCl solution. LW, EL, and AB denote van der Waals, electrostatic interactions, and Lewis acid/base interactions, respectively.
-
Figure 3.
Effects of (a) thermal treatment and (b) enzymatic treatments of Leuc. citreum SJ-57 on their FR. Statistical analysis of differences in FRs between cells after various treatments and the control group was performed using t-test. * represents p < 0.05.
-
Figure 4.
(a) Effect of extraction reagents on the starch-flocculating activity of Leuc. citreum SJ-57. Different letters represent significant differences (p < 0.05). (b) SDS–PAGE analysis of whole cell surface proteins (lane 1), unbound starch of cell surface proteins (lane 2), and starch-binding surface proteins (lane 3). The molecular masses (in kDa) of the standard proteins (lane M) are indicated on the left. (c) Sedimentation of starch emulsions after resting for 5 min. Control: natural sedimentation of starch emulsions. Cell surface proteins: sedimentation of starch mixed with surface proteins. SJ-57: sedimentation of starch mixed with Leuc. citreum SJ-57.
-
Figure 5.
(a) Changes in FR as a function of time when Leuc. citreum SJ-57 cells were washed with NaCl. (b) The protein and EPS content changes in the wash solution as a function of time when Leuc. citreum SJ-57 cells were washed with NaCl. TEM pictures of Leuc. citreum SJ-57 (c) before and (d) after washing with NaCl for 6 h.
-
Figure 6.
Proposed starch flocculation mechanism of Leuc. citreum SJ-57.
-
Surface tension parameters (mJ/m2) γLW γ+ γ− γTot H2O 21.8 25.5 25.5 72.8 C3H8O3 34.0 3.9 57.4 64.0 CH2I2 50.8 0.0 0.0 50.8 Note: γLW represents the LW component of the surface tension. γ+ and γ- are the electron-acceptor and electron-donor parameters of the surface tension, respectively. Table 1.
Surface tension parameters of probe liquids used for contact angle measurements for Leuc. citreum SJ-57 and starch granules.
-
Contact angles (degree) Surface tension
parameters (mJ/m2)ΔGiwi
(mJ/m2)H2O C3H8O3 CH2I2 γLW γ+ γ− Leuc. citreum
SJ-5753.5 ± 4.3 49.2 ± 2.0 24.5 ± 2.9 46.3 0.3 21.9 −15.8 Starch 26.8 ± 2.8 31.3 ± 7.5 18.5 ± 2.7 48.2 41.6 0.6 13.7 The contact angles are presented as the means ± standard error. Parameters γLW, γ+, and γ− are the surface tension components. Hydrophobicity was evaluated by ΔGiwi, which was calculated using the surface tension parameters according to Eqn (2). Table 2.
Contact angles of water, glycoside, and diiodomethane on Leuc. citreum SJ-57 and starch granules, along with the derived surface tension parameters and hydrophobicity of the surfaces.
-
Band Protein Accession
numberNumber of
matchesScore Isoelectric
pointMolecular
weight (KD)1 GW (glycine-tryptophan)) dipeptide domain-containing WP_146992371.1 154 3546 5.26 230 2 GW (glycine-tryptophan)) dipeptide domain-containing WP_146992371.1 867 22986 5.26 230 3 GW (glycine-tryptophan)) dipeptide domain-containing WP_146992371.1 761 18792 5.26 230 4 molecular chaperone DnaK WP_040177072.1 281 6808 4.60 65 5 Chaperonin GroEL WP_004901547.1 1085 28391 4.60 57 6 Elongation factor Tu WP_004900335.1 297 6485 4.82 43 7 Lysozyme M1 WP_004901157.1 974 26689 5.08 36 8 Lysozyme M1 WP_004901157.1 110 2473 5.08 36 Table 3.
Candidate starch-binding proteins extracted from the surface of Leuc. citreum SJ-57.
Figures
(6)
Tables
(3)