| [1] |
Miskolczi M, Földes D, Munkácsy A, Jászberényi M. 2021. Urban mobility scenarios until the 2030s. Sustainable Cities and Society 72:103029 doi: 10.1016/j.scs.2021.103029 |
| [2] |
Hensher DA, Nelson JD, Mulley C. 2022. Electric car sharing as a service (ECSaaS) – Acknowledging the role of the car in the public mobility ecosystem and what it might mean for MaaS as eMaaS? Transport Policy 116:212−16 doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2021.12.007 |
| [3] |
Huang S. 2022. Listening to users' personal privacy concerns. The implication of trust and privacy concerns on the user's adoption of a MaaS-pilot. Case Studies on Transport Policy 10:2153−64 doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.09.012 |
| [4] |
Lopez-Carreiro I, Monzon A, Lois D, Lopez-Lambas ME. 2021. Are travellers willing to adopt MaaS? Exploring attitudinal and personality factors in the case of Madrid, Spain. Travel Behaviour and Society 25:246−61 doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2021.07.011 |
| [5] |
Wang S, Li J, Zhao D. 2017. The impact of policy measures on consumer intention to adopt electric vehicles: Evidence from China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 105:14−26 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2017.08.013 |
| [6] |
Hu X, Wang S, Zhou R, Gao L, Zhu Z. 2023. Policy driven or consumer trait driven? Unpacking the EVs purchase intention of consumers from the policy and consumer trait perspective. Energy Policy 177:113559 doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113559 |
| [7] |
Zeiske N, van der Werff E, Steg L. 2021. The effects of a financial incentive on motives and intentions to commute to work with public transport in the short and long term. Journal of Environmental Psychology 78:101718 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101718 |
| [8] |
Wei J, Zhang L, Yang R, Song M. 2023. A new perspective to promote sustainable low-carbon consumption: The influence of informational incentive and social influence. Journal of Environmental Management 327:116848 doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116848 |
| [9] |
Matowicki M, Amorim M, Kern M, Pecherkova P, Motzer N, et al. 2022. Understanding the potential of MaaS – An European survey on attitudes. Travel Behaviour and Society 27:204−15 doi: 10.1016/j.tbs.2022.01.009 |
| [10] |
Ye J, Zheng J, Yi F. 2020. A study on users' willingness to accept mobility as a service based on UTAUT model. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 157:120066 doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120066 |
| [11] |
Aman JJC, Smith-Colin J. 2022. Application of crowdsourced data to infer user satisfaction with mobility as a service (MaaS). Transportation research interdisciplinary perspectives 15:100672 doi: 10.1016/j.trip.2022.100672 |
| [12] |
van't Veer R, Annema JA, Araghi Y, Homem de Almeida Correia G, van Wee B. 2023. Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A latent class cluster analysis to identify Dutch vehicle owners' use intention. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 169:103608 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103608 |
| [13] |
Kriswardhana W, Esztergár-Kiss D. 2024. University students’ adoption of mobility as a service with respect to user preferences and group differences. Journal of Public Transportation. 26:100079 |
| [14] |
Alonso-González MJ, Hoogendoorn-Lanser S, van Oort N, Cats O, Hoogendoorn S. 2020. Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 132:378−401 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.022 |
| [15] |
Christensen TH, Friis F, Nielsen MV. 2022. Shifting from ownership to access and the future for MaaS: Insights from car sharing practices in Copenhagen. Case Studies on Transport Policy 10:841−50 doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.02.011 |
| [16] |
Fenton P, Chimenti G, Kanda W. 2020. The role of local government in governance and diffusion of Mobility-as-a-Service: exploring the views of MaaS stakeholders in Stockholm. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 63:2554−76 doi: 10.1080/09640568.2020.1740655 |
| [17] |
Vij A, Dühr S. 2022. The commercial viability of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): What's in it for existing transport operators, and why should governments intervene? Transport Reviews 42:695−716 doi: 10.1080/01441647.2022.2028032 |
| [18] |
Khan U, Yamamoto T, Sato H. 2020. Consumer preferences for hydrogen fuel cell vehicles in Japan. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 87:102542 doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2020.102542 |
| [19] |
dos Reis RA, Grant-Muller S, Lovelace R, Hodgson F. 2022. Different people, different incentives? Examining the public acceptance of smartphone-based persuasive strategies for sustainable travel using psychographic segmentation. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation 16:1−21 doi: 10.1080/15568318.2020.1836693 |
| [20] |
Chen Y, Acheampong RA. 2023. Mobility-as-a-service transitions in China: Emerging policies, initiatives, platforms and MaaS implementation models. Case Studies on Transport Policy 13:101054 doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2023.101054 |
| [21] |
Sochor J, Arby H, Karlsson ICM, Sarasini S. 2018. A topological approach to Mobility as a Service: A proposed tool for understanding requirements and effects, and for aiding the integration of societal goals. Research in Transportation Business & Management 27:3−14 doi: 10.1016/j.rtbm.2018.12.003 |
| [22] |
Li W, Shibasaki R, Zhang H, Chen J. 2022. MaaS system development and APPs. In Big Data and Mobility as a Service, eds. Zhang H, Song X, Shibasaki R. Netherlands: Elsevier. pp. 1−24. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-323-90169-7.00002-6 |
| [23] |
Sakai K. 2020. Public transport promotion and mobility-as-a-service. IEICE Transactions on Fundamentals of Electronics, Communications and Computer Sciences E103.A:226−30 doi: 10.1587/transfun.2019tsi0001 |
| [24] |
Yang Y, Lin S. 2023. External pressures and internal dynamics of the implementation of MaaS: Case study of Shanghai City Government. Insights from ongoing Arctic cooperation, Seminar “Norway-China Academic Cooperation connected to Arctic issues", Shanghai, China, 2023. Academic lecture. Nord University and High North Center. |
| [25] |
Brezovec P, Hampl N. 2021. Electric vehicles ready for breakthrough in MaaS? consumer adoption of E-car sharing and E-scooter sharing as a part of mobility-as-a-service (MaaS). Energies 14:1088 doi: 10.3390/en14041088 |
| [26] |
Kriswardhana W, Esztergár-Kiss D. 2023. Exploring the aspects of MaaS adoption based on college students' preferences. Transport Policy 136:113−25 doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.03.018 |
| [27] |
Lopez-Carreiro I, Monzon A. 2023. Exploring travellers' willingness to adopt MaaS in two European metropolitan areas. Transportation Research Procedia 72:1885−93 doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2023.11.667 |
| [28] |
Roos JM, Sprei F, Holmberg U. 2022. Traits and transports: The effects of personality on the choice of urban transport modes. Applied Sciences 12:1467 doi: 10.3390/app12031467 |
| [29] |
Hensher DA, Ho CQ, Mulley C, Wong Y, Nelson JD, Smith G, et al. 2020. Understanding Mobility as a Service (MaaS): Past, present and future. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2019-0-00508-0 |
| [30] |
Seebauer S, Stolz R, Berger M. 2015. Technophilia as a driver for using advanced traveler information systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 60:498−510 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2015.10.009 |
| [31] |
Fioreze T, De Gruijter M, Geurs K. 2019. On the likelihood of using Mobility-as-a-Service: A case study on innovative mobility services among residents in the Netherlands. Case Studies on Transport Policy 7:790−801 doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2019.08.002 |
| [32] |
Schikofsky J, Dannewald T, Kowald M. 2020. Exploring motivational mechanisms behind the intention to adopt mobility as a service (MaaS): Insights from Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 131:296−312 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.09.022 |
| [33] |
Dastjerdi AM, Kaplan S, de Abreu e Silva J, Nielsen OA, Pereira FC. 2019. Use intention of mobility-management travel apps: The role of users goals, technophile attitude and community trust. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 126:114−35 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2019.06.001 |
| [34] |
Tsouros I, Tsirimpa A, Pagoni I, Polydoropoulou A. 2021. MaaS users: Who they are and how much they are willing-to-pay. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 148:470−80 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2021.04.016 |
| [35] |
Kamargianni M, Li W, Matyas M, Schäfer A. 2016. A critical review of new mobility services for urban transport. Transportation Research Procedia 14:3294−303 doi: 10.1016/j.trpro.2016.05.277 |
| [36] |
Pritchard J. 2022. MaaS to pull us out of a car-centric orbit: Principles for sustainable Mobility-as-a-Service in the context of unsustainable car dependency. Case Studies on Transport Policy 10:1483−93 doi: 10.1016/j.cstp.2022.08.00 |
| [37] |
Zong F, Li YX, Zeng M. 2023. Developing a carbon emission charging scheme considering mobility as a service. Energy 267:126495 doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.126495 |
| [38] |
Madigan R, Louw T, Wilbrink M, Schieben A, Merat N. 2017. What influences the decision to use automated public transport? Using UTAUT to understand public acceptance of automated road transport systems. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour 50:55−64 doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2017.07.007 |
| [39] |
Ghasri M, Vij A. 2021. The potential impact of media commentary and social influence on consumer preferences for driverless cars. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies 127:103132 doi: 10.1016/j.trc.2021.103132 |
| [40] |
Manca F, Sivakumar A, Polak JW. 2022. Capturing the effect of multiple social influence sources on the adoption of new transport technologies and services. Journal of choice modelling 42:100344 doi: 10.1016/j.jocm.2022.100344 |
| [41] |
Zhu C, Shou M, Zhou Y, Li W. 2023. Modeling the effect of social media on older adults' usage intention of public transport. Economic Analysis and Policy 77:239−50 doi: 10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.014 |
| [42] |
Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. 2010. Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice Hall. |
| [43] |
Hu Lt, Bentler PM. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 6:1−55 doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118 |
| [44] |
Lanza ST, Rhoades BL. 2013. Latent class analysis: an alternative perspective on subgroup analysis in prevention and treatment. Prevention science 14:157−68 doi: 10.1007/s11121-011-0201-1 |
| [45] |
Narayanan S, Antoniou C. 2023. Shared mobility services towards Mobility as a Service (MaaS): What, who and when? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 168:103581 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103581 |
| [46] |
Chen C-F, Fu C, Chen Y-C. 2023. Exploring tourist preference for Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) – A latent class choice approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 174:103750 doi: 10.1016/j.tra.2023.103750 |
| [47] |
Enoch M, Potter S. 2023. MaaS (Mobility as a Service) market futures explored. Transport Policy 134:31−40 doi: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.02.007 |