-
The overall least square means body weight of Awassi crossbred lambs at birth weight, day 90, 180, 270 and yearling weights were 3.10 ± 0.01, 13.04 ± 0.07, 16.95 ± 0.08, 20.84 ± 0.11 and 24.42 ± 0.14 kg, respectively, as shown in Table 1. Meanwhile the overall mean growth performance of local Tikur
sheep in this study were 1.81 ± 0.06, 7.58 ± 0.19, 10.37 ± 0.23 and 13.87 ± 0.30 kg for birth weight, day 90, 180 and 360, respectively (Table 2). As compared to local Tikur sheep, crossing Awassi crossbred rams with Tikur ewes increased the weights of the yearlings by 71.27%, 76.78%, 63.45%, and 76.06% at birth, 90 d, 180 d, and 180-d, respectively. In comparison with Hassen et al.[13] study, our crossbred lambs advantage over local Tikur sheep at birth weight was higher (71.27%) than theirs which reported 8.3% improvement. The heterosis effect may have caused the difference between the two studies because the local breeds used were different. However, the crossbred lamb performance in the present study was lower than those reported by Shaker et al.[14]. These authors reported live birth and weaning weights of 4.37 ± 0.16 kg and 17.84 ± 0.68 kg in crossbred F1 Awassi × Charollais crossbred lambs, 3.85 ± 0.16 kg and 18.94 ± 0.69 kg in crossbred F1 Awassi × Romanov crossbred lambs, and 3.58 ± 0.24 kg and 13.13 ± 1.08 kg in Awassi lambs, respectively. One possible explanation for the observed differences is the breed of dams and their management systems. Table 1. Body weight (LSM ± SE) of Awassi-Tikur crossbred sheep based on location and year of birth.
Variable n BW ± SE S n BWT 90 ± SE n BWT180 ± SE n BWT270 ± SE n BWT360 ± SE Overall 2,069 3.10 ± 0.01 785 13.04 ± 0.07 809 16.95 ± 0.08 692 20.84 ± 0.11 642 24.42 ± 0.14 Year of birth * ns * *** *** 2007 203 3.09 ± 0.05b 4 12.84 ± 1.14 7 17.62 ± 0.96ab 6 19.63 ± 1.27b 31 21.18 ± 0.81c 2008 610 3.17 ± 0.04ab 148 12.81 ± 0.28 184 16.92 ± 0.34ab 176 20.09 ± 0.47b 162 24.70 ± 0.57b 2009 814 3.21 ± 0.04a 467 12.58 ± 0.30 498 16.53 ± 0.31b 431 20.17 ± 0.45b 392 25.24 ± 0.52b 2010 367 3.15 ± 0.04ab 98 12.54 ± 0.30 84 17.43 ± 0.41a 48 23.28 ± 0.62a 40 31.82 ± 0.85a 2011 75 3.08 ± 0.07b 68 12.47 ± 0.31 36 16.88 ± 0.69ab 31 22.98 ± 0.99a 17 28.91 ± 1.47a Villages *** *** *** *** *** Mariam 254 3.18 ± 0.05b 72 11.13 ± 0.44c 79 15.38 ± 0.49c 75 19.39 ± 0.65c 68 23.86 ± 0.71c Mikael 602 3.35 ± 0.04a 138 13.53 ± 0.33b 163 18.24 ± 0.37b 146 22.54 ± 0.51b 148 28.29 ± 0.52b Geiorgis 654 2.79 ± 0.04c 155 14.89 ± 0.35a 187 21.28 ± 0.39a 186 27.28 ± 0.53a 177 33.27 ± 0.57a a, b,c,d Means bearing different superscript in a column differ significantly (P < 0.05). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, LSM = least square mean, BW = birth weight, BWT90 = body weight at 90 d, BWT180 = body weight at 180 d, BWT270 = body weight at 270 d, BWT360 = body weight at 360 d and SE = standard error. Table 2. Body weight (LSM ± SE) of local Tikur
sheep in Wadla district. Variable n BW ± SE n BWT90 ± SE n BWT180 ± SE n BWT360 ± SE Overall ns ns ns ns 50 1.81 ± 0.06 48 7.58 ± 0.19 44 10.37 ± 0.23 11 13.87 ± 0.30 Sex ns ns ns ns Female 29 1.87 ± 0.08 27 7.75 ± 0.26 23 10.29 ± 0.32 5 13.92 ± 0.45 Male 21 1.72 ± 0.09 21 7.35 ± 0.29 21 10.46 ± 0.33 6 13.83 ± 0.41 CV 23.22 17.62 14.61 7.19 LSM = least square means, ns = non-significant at P < 0.05, BW = birth weight, BWT90 = body weight at 90 d, BWT180 = body weight at 180 d, BWT270 = body weight at 270 d, BWT360 = body weight at 360 d and SE = standard error. The 90-day weight Awassi-Tikur crossbred lambs (13.04 kg) was higher in our study than that reported by Lemma et al.[15] for Awassi crossbred sires (AL) mating with local ewes (LL). Nonetheless, our lamb weight at 180 d is lower than that reported for (AL × LL, 17.26 kg) by the same author. The reason may be related to the availability of feed due to location differences since feed sources are entirely dependent on grazing and farmer management after weaning. Moreover, the 90 and 180-d weight in our study (13.04 and 16.95 kg) were much higher than 10.47 and 15.28 kg reported by Hassen et al.[16] for Awassi crossbred lambs, respectively.
Overall average daily gains of Awassi-Tikur crossbred lambs in this study were 102.44 ± 0.76, 37.56 ± 0.60, and 36.94 ± 0.68 g/day, respectively at 90-d, between 90 and 180-d, and between 270 and 360 -d (Table 3). According to Ameha et al.[17], the weight of yearlings obtained from crossing Awassi and Tikur sheep is within the range of weight approved for export from Ethiopia: 15−30 kg (depending on the importing country's requirements).
Table 3. Average daily gain (g/d) of Awassi-Tikur crossbred sheep based on year of birth, location, and season.
Variable n ADG1 ± SE n ADG2 ± SE n ADG 3 ± SE n ADG 4 ± SE Overall *** *** *** *** 542 102.44 ± 0.76 675 37.56 ± 0.60 613 34.95 ± 0.67 523 36.94 ± 0.68 Year of birth ** *** *** *** 2007 3 91.30 ± 11.22abc 4 56.88 ± 9.49ab 5 34.40 ± 8.19b 3 24.05 ± 9.90bc 2008 75 94.50 ± 3.31c 140 45.55 ± 2.68b 160 31.37 ± 3.21b 136 36.89 ± 2.95c 2009 311 100.18 ± 2.67b 437 46.02 ± 2.42b 393 33.11 ± 3.10b 353 42.07 ± 2.69b 2010 93 105.56 ± 3.09a 60 56.22 ± 3.25a 28 50.97 ± 4.46a 17 60.16 ± 5.11a 2011 60 103.09 ± 3.28ab 34 33.39 ± 4.83c 27 60.14 ± 5.89a 14 50.21 ± 6.86abc Villages *** *** *** *** Mariam 71 85.98 ± 4.48c 72 49.85 ± 3.77b 73 42.78 ± 4.07b 64 44.92 ± 3.82c Mikael 117 107.98 ± 3.46b 130 56.56 ± 2.94a 123 44.60 ± 3.36b 92 52.95 ± 3.17b Giorgis 121 119.08 ± 3.69a 130 59.26 ± 6.10a 123 62.46 ± 3.47a 92 60.28 ± 3.33a Season ns ns ns ns Dry 294 99.28 ± 3.61 459 44.06 ± 2.92 439 42.51 ± 3.51 385 39.31 ± 3.40 Wet 248 98.57 ± 4.46 216 51.17 ± 4.08 174 41.49 ± 4.30 138 46.04 ± 4.73 a, b,c,d Means bearing different superscript in a column differ significantly (P < 0.05). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ADG 1 = ADG between (birth weight) and (body weight at 90 d), ADG 2 = ADG between (body weight at 90 d) and (body weight at 180 d), ADG 3 = ADG between (body weight at 180 d) and (body weight at 270 d), ADG 4 = ADG between (body weight at 270 d) and (body weight at 360 d) and SE = standard error. Location
-
At birth and on days 90, 180, 270 and 360, body weights were significantly different among villages (P < 0.001), as shown in Table 1. Geiorgis village lambs were heavier than those born in the other villages on all traits. The presence of large and productive communal grazing lands at Geiorgis village may contribute to improved growth performance. Across Geiorgis, Mikael, and Mariam villages, the weights of Awassi crossbred lambs at yearling were 33.27 ± 0.57 kg, 28.29 ± 0.52 kg and 23.86 ± 1.15 kg, respectively. Even if they are similar breeds, we observed drastic differences in performance across locations due to feed availability and farmer management. This result showed that their performance was different across locations based on management. Similarly, Getachew et al.[18] reported a difference in survival and productivity under farmers' management. Despite the location difference, the overall results showed that crossbreeding Awassi-Tikur crossbred rams improved body weight and help to reached marketable weight earlier than local Tikur breed in the Ethiopian highlands, as shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Lambing year and season of birth
-
Lambing year had significant effect on body weight and average daily gain of Awassi crossbred lambs as shown in Tables 1 and 3. Except for 90-d body weight, all other variables were affected (P < 0.05) by lambing year (Table 1). At birth, Awassi crossbred lambs born in 2009 (3.21 kg) were heavier (P < 0.05) than those born in 2007 (3.09 kg) or 2011 (3.08 kg). As compared with 2008 (94.50 g/d), pre-weaning average daily gain was significantly higher (P < 0.001) in 2011 (103.09 g/day) and 2010 (105.56 g/d) (Table 3). Moreover, average daily gain at other weight periods also were better in 2010 and 2011 compared to other years. Even though the data was not recorded, the drought situation in 2009 could have caused a feed shortage in the study area, resulting in a decrease in Awassi-Tikur cross lamb growth rate. Contrary to this, in 2010 and 2011, there was sufficient precipitation and F2-generations were born with high exotic blood levels, contributing to greater growth rates in crossbred lambs. In most cases, body weight differences between years can be attributed to variation in precipitation and its effect on pastures, forages, and other feeds, which can either directly affect lambs or indirectly through dams by affecting milk production of ewes. Similarly, Albial et al.[19], Shaker et al.[20] and Lemma et al.[15] reported the effect of lambing year on the growth rate of sheep breeds.
At birth weight, lambs born in the dry season were significantly heavier than lambs born in the wet season (P < 0.01) (Table 4). Lambing seasons difference in body weight and gain have been attributed to variation in rain precipitation and its impact on pastures, forage, and feed availability. Consistent with our results, Albial et al.[19] reported higher birth weight during the dry season. The differences in birth weight between these seasons are potentially explained by moderate weather conditions and green forages available during pregnancy and lambs' growth stages. In contrast to our study, lambs born during the rainy season were heavier at birth and weaning and grew faster than lambs born during the light rainfall or the dry season[13,18].
Table 4. Body weight (LSM ± SE) of Awassi-Tikur crossbred sheep based on season, sex and exotic blood level.
Variable n BW ± SE n BWT90 ± SE n BWT180 ± SE n BWT270 ± SE n BWT360 ± SE Season ** ns ns ns ns Dry 1,209 3.19 ± 0.04a 497 12.99 ± 0.32 533 16.90 ± 0.39 489 21.55 ± 0.54 466 26.71 ± 0.51 Wet 860 3.09 ± 0.09b 288 12.30 ± 0.46 276 17.25 ± 0.45 203 20.91 ± 0.65 176 26.03 ± 0.74 Sex ns ns ns ns ns Female 1,021 3.15 ± 0.05 410 12.75 ± 0.34 437 17.20 ± 0.39 377 20.90 ± 0.56 350 26.22 ± 0.54 Male 1,048 3.13 ± 0.06 375 12.55 ± 0.41 372 16.95 ± 0.48 315 21.56 ± 0.70 292 26.51 ± 0.80 Awassi Blood ns *** * *** *** 23.44% 548 3.10 ± 0.03 105 12.01 ± 0.32bc 123 16.05 ± 0.35b 116 19.67 ± 0.47c 119 24.16 ± 0.54c 28.00% 69 3.05 ± 0.06 23 11.26 ± 0.48c 24 17.05 ± 0.56ab 23 22.62 ± 0.72a 20 25.99 ± 0.92b 32.50% 1,414 3.08 ± 0.02 638 12.56 ± 0.25b 644 17.26 ± 0.27a 540 21.74 ± 0.37ab 494 25.65 ± 0.45b 44.24% 21 3.08 ± 0.11 9 12.96 ± 0.75ab 9 17.78 ± 0.93ab 5 19.13 ± 1.40bc -- --- 48.75% 17 3.39 ± 0.12 10 14.46 ± 0.72a 9 17.23 ± 0.89ab 8 22.99 ± 1.28a 9 29.68 ± 1.55a CV 15.86 14.68 13.97 13.92 14.32 a, b,c Means bearing different superscript in a column differ significantly (P < 0.05). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, LSM = least square mean, BW = birth weight, BWT90 = body weight at 90 d, BWT180 = body weight at 180 d, BWT270 = body weight at 270 d, BWT360 = body weight at 360 d and SE = standard error. Furthermore, there were significant interactions between year and season for birth weight, 180-d weight, 270-d weight, and yearling weight (P < 0.05), as shown in Table 5. As a result of varying rainfall patterns across years, the seasons effect was not constant during the study period.
Table 5. Two-way table for the interaction between year of birth and season of birth of Awassi-Tikur crossbred sheep.
Variable n BW ± SE n BWT90 ± SE n BWT180 ± SE n BWT270 ± SE n BWT360 ± SE Year of birth Birth season ** ns *** * ns 2007 Dry 116 3.18 ± 0.06b 3 13.51 ± 1.15 3 15.96 ± 1.41ab 3 19.32 ± 1.75bcd 16 22.07 ± 1.03 2007 Wet 87 3.01 ± 0.06c 1 12.16 ± 1.95 4 19.27 ± 1.23a 3 19.94 ± 1.74bcd 15 20.27 ± 1.03 2008 Dry 383 3.16 ± 0.05b 99 12.64 ± 0.30 111 16.37 ± 0.37b 108 19.67 ± 0.51d 110 24.05 ± 0.58 2008 Wet 227 3.18 ± 0.05b 49 12.99 ± 0.36 73 17.47 ± 0.40ab 68 20.50 ± 0.55cd 52 25.35 ± 0.70 2009 Dry 447 3.29 ± 0.04a 296 12.83 ± 0.25 326 16.68 ± 0.32b 318 19.83 ± 0.45d 293 25.08 ± 0.52 2009 Wet 367 3.14 ± 0.04b 171 12.33 ± 0.28 172 16.39 ± 0.35b 113 20.50 ± 0.52c 99 26.41 ± 0.60 2010 Dry 218 3.15 ± 0.05b 56 12.81 ± 0.34 61 17.77 ± 0.41ab 32 24.24 ± 0.66a 32 31.91 ± 0.77 2010 Wet 149 3.15 ± 0.05b 42 12.28 ± 0.38 23 17.08 ± 0.58b 16 22.32 ± 0.85b 8 31.73 ± 1.35 2011 Dry 45 3.17 ± 0.08abc 43 13.20 ± 0.36 32 17.73 ± 0.50ab 28 24.67 ± 0.68a 15 30.44 ± 1.06 2011 Wet 30 2.98 ± 0.10c 25 11.75 ± 0.45 4 16.03 ± 1.24b 3 21.30 ± 1.77abcd 2 27.39 ± 2.60 CV 16.45 14.94 13.72 13.83 14.32 a, b,c,d Means bearing different superscript in a column differ significantly (P < 0.05). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, LSM = least square mean, BW = birth weight, BWT90 = body weight at 90 d of age, BWT180 = body weight at 180 d of age, BWT270 = body weight at 270 d of age, BWT360 = body weight at 360 d of age and SE = standard error. Lamb sex
-
All traits were non-significant (P > 0.05) for Lamb's sex (Table 4). However, most studies showed significant differences between sex and males having higher weight and gain than females[21−23].
Exotic blood level
-
Body weight was significantly affected by Awassi blood levels on days 90, 270, and 360 (P < 0.001), as well as on day 180 (P < 0.05) (Table 4). Despite this, blood levels did not affect birth weight (P > 0.05). Further, Hassen et al.[16] reported that birth and weaning weights were significantly increased by Awassi blood levels up to 75%.
The average daily gain of crossbred Awassi-Tikur among exotic blood levels did not show significant effects until weaning (90 days). However, the differences were significant (P < 0.001) after weaning (Table 6). We found that all the Awassi exotic blood levels in our study met Ethiopian marketable standards for export marketing between 15−30 kg. However, a higher standard of weight above 25 kg was achieved at yearling when Awassi sires with 56%−65% exotic blood levels were used to produce lambs with blood levels greater than 28% Awassi-Tikur lamb.
Table 6. Average daily gain (g/d) of Awassi-Tikur crossbred sheep based on sex, and Awassi blood level.
Variable n ADG1 ± SE n ADG2 ± SE n ADG 3 ± SE n ADG 4 ± SE Sex ns ns ns ns Female 284 97.79 ± 3.89 358 49.41 ± 3.11 329 41.43 ± 3.49 279 39.18 ± 3.59 Male 258 100.07 ± 4.18 317 45.82 ± 3.56 284 42.57 ± 4.84 244 46.18 ± 4.18 Awassi blood ns *** *** * 23.44% 97 95.80 ± 3.20 103 38.26 ± 2.95c 112 39.84 ± 2.98c 97 37.79 ± 3.41b 28.00% 21 91.31 ± 4.64 22 61.01 ± 4.21a 19 57.94 ± 4.55a 15 34.34 ± 5.11b 32.50% 411 98.99 ± 2.55 534 48.02 ± 2.33b 471 46.86 ± 2.42b 405 42.22 ± 2.98ab 44.24% 9 109.59 ± 7.03 9 57.06 ± 6.36ab 5 25.06 ± 8.14c 48.75% 4 98.94 ± 9.27 7 33.71 ± 6.53c 6 40.29 ± 9.84abc 6 56.35 ± 7.73a CV 17.18 41.78 47.48 41.91 a, b,c,d Means bearing different superscript in a row differ significantly (P < 0.05). * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001, ADG 1 = ADG between (birth weight) and (body weight at 90 d), ADG 2 = ADG between (body weight at 90 d) and (body weight at 180 d, ADG 3 = ADG between (body weight at 180 d) and (body weight at 270 d), ADG 4 = ADG between (body weight at 270 d) and (body weight at 360 d) and SE = standard error. -
In the highlands of North Wollo zone, where sheep production is the mainstay of the economy, Awassi crossbred rams crossed with Tikur ewes proved to be able to adapt well to cold weather, leading to an increase in birth weights, 90, 180, and 360-d weights by 71.27%, 76.78%, 63.45%, and 76.06%, respectively. The results of this research showed that crossbreeding Awassi crossbred rams with blood levels of 56% and above can produce superior progeny that can produce yearling weight that meet the export live weight standard of 25 kg. Therefore, this study showed crossbred lambs can perform well under traditional conditions and can be used as a reliable approach/technology in the highlands of North Wollo and other similar agro-ecological regions to improve the livelihood of farmers. It would be helpful to scale up this approach and introduce it in various highland regions. To improve farmers' livelihoods and secure sustainable production, future research should examine different feed supplementation strategies to achieve export marketable weight at an earlier age.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Tilahun M, Deribe B, Lakew M, Abreha S, Belayneh N, et al. 2022. The Awassi sire can be used to crossbred with low-productive Tikur local ewes to produce export-marketable weight at yearling under farmer's management in the Ethiopian highlands. Circular Agricultural Systems 2:6 doi: 10.48130/CAS-2022-0006
The Awassi sire can be used to crossbred with low-productive Tikur local ewes to produce export-marketable weight at yearling under farmer's management in the Ethiopian highlands
- Received: 03 September 2022
- Accepted: 19 October 2022
- Published online: 15 November 2022
Abstract: A community-based sheep cross breeding project was conducted in Ethiopia with exotic Awassi crossbred rams and less productive indigenous Tikur ewes. Fifty-five Awassi crossbred rams having 46, 48, 56 and 65% Awassi blood levels were purchased and distributed to the participating 84 farmers which had 2,884 breeding ewes. The overall least square mean weights for F1 and F2 generation lambs at birth, day 90, 180, 270 and yearling weight were 3.10 ± 0.01, 13.04 ± 0.07, 16.95 ± 0.08, 20.84 ± 0.11 and 24.42 ± 0.14 kg, respectively. Body weight traits were significantly affected by lambing year for birth weight (P < 0.05), 180-day(d) weight (P < 0.05), 270-d weight (P < 0.001) and 360 d (yearling) weight (P < 0.001) but no effect (P > 0.05) was noted for 90-d weight (weaning weight). Season of lambing had significant effect (P < 0.01) only for birth weight. There was a significant difference (P < 0.001) among the different villages for birth weight, and for day 90, 180, 270 and 360 body weights. The study showed that crossing Awassi crossbred rams with Tikur ewes can improve birth weight by 71.27%, 90-d weight by 76.78%, 180-d weight by 63.45% and yearling weight by 76.06% under farmer management practices. Results revealed that crossing Awassi crossbred rams with blood level of 56% and above with local Tikur ewes resulted in superior progenies that can fulfill export live weight standard of 25 kg at yearling weight. The future of Awassi-Tikur sheep farming must focus on feed supplementation strategies and on establishing cooperatives for farmers to improve their livelihoods.
-
Key words:
- Awassi /
- Crossbreeding /
- Export marketable weight /
- Growth /
- Sheep