-
Firstly, the relationship between the weight of plant samples and the purity and concentration of DNA extracted from them was assessed. There was no significant difference in A260/A280 and A260/A230 values when the weight of leaf midrib and branch bark used for DNA extraction ranged from 0.0063 g to 0.1 g. Specifically, A260/A280 values were from 2.04 to 2.11 for the leaf midrib samples and from 2.08 to 2.11 for bark samples, while A260/A230 values were 2.24−2.48 and 2.19−2.73 accordingly for the two types of samples. DNA concentration also showed an increasing trend with the multiple increases of sample weight from 0.0063 g to 0.1 g (Fig. 1). Intriguingly, CLas titers did not increase with the weight of sample.
Figure 1.
Associations of the DNA quantity or 'Candidatus Liberiabcter asiaticus' titers with the weight of (a) leaf midrib or (b) bark tissue from sour tangerine (Citrus sunki Hort. ex Tanaka) seedlings.
Analysis of the relationship between sample weight and the concentration of CLas in them showed that the CLas could be detected by RT-qPCR in the leaf midrib or branch bark samples weighted from 0.0063 g to 0.1 g (Table 1). Although the qualitative diagnosis of HLB could be guaranteed, the accuracy of quantitative detection remains to be evaluated. Comparatively, the detection results of CLas titers were significantly affected by the lowest weight (0.0063 g) of samples. When the weight of leaf midrib or branch bark samples was 0.0125 g, CLas titers were the highest in every gram of fresh samples. Thus, enough DNA can be extracted from only 0.0125 g leaf midrib or bark samples for accurate and efficient detection of CLas. Leaf midrib samples weighted from 0.0125 g to 0.1 g and bark samples ranging from 0.0063 g to 0.0125 g were more suitable for CLas detection than the other sample types.
Table 1. DNA quantity and 'Candidatus Liberibcter asiaticus titer' titers of the samples from leaf midrib or bark tissues of sour tangerine (Citrus sunki Hort. Ex Tanaka) seedlings.
Sample weight (g) DNA concentration
(ng/µL)Ct No of CLas per ng DNA No of CLas per g sample and per ng DNA 0.1000 346.80 ± 8.55a 20.59 ± 0.27 437.99 ± 0.18a 4379.88 ± 1.78c 0.0500 302.32 ± 32.65a 20.81 ± 0.18 327.38 ± 14.86b 6547.54 ± 297.13c 0.0250 209.01 ± 9.05b 20.99 ± 0.09 455.11 ± 11.93a 18204.47 ± 477.17b 0.0125 93.24 ± 13.42c 21.98 ± 0.23 443.26 ± 28.64a 35460.98 ± 2291.10a 0.0063 67.27 ± 4.58c 24.88 ± 1.25 41.52 ± 11.59c 6591.01 ± 1839.16c 0.1000 569.70 ± 4.63a 25.52 ± 0.71 4.79 ± 1.55d 47.89 ± 15.48c 0.0500 410.17 ± 24.84b 21.51 ± 0.04 161.35 ± 6.90c 3227.05 ± 138.04b 0.0250 255.51 ± 17.53c 21.76 ± 0.15 218.51 ± 13.48b 8740.35 ± 539.30b 0.0125 133.12 ± 6.73d 22.66 ± 0.69 360.91 ± 9.14a 28873.06 ± 731.36a 0.0063 66.78 ± 2.89e 24.21 ± 0.16 154.34 ± 21.75c 24498.65 ± 3452.89a Data in the table are showed as mean ± standard error (SE). Data of the first five lines are for leaf midrib samples, while the later five lines are for the shoot bark samples. The statistic analysis was carried out separately between sample weight and each of the six groups of relative index separately. Relationship between growth status of grafting buds and incidence of HLB
-
The growth status of buds used as donors for graft-inoculation was classified into three categories. Seedlings marked as 'a-bud', 'b-bud' and 'c-bud' indicate the buds grew vigorously, moderately and poorly respectively after 6 month-after-graft-inoculation (MAG) (Fig. 2a), with 30, 36, and 26 plants in each group respectively.
Figure 2.
Different growth status of buds carrying 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' used for graft inoculation (a) and percentage stacking of the number of months that plants with different buds were positive for CLas (b). (a1) The 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' (CLas)-infected donor buds were in vigorous growth after grafting. A total of 30 stock plants were with 'a-bud' . (a2) The buds were in moderate growth condition after grafting. A total of 36 acceptor plants were with 'b-bud'. (a3) The buds with poor growth status on stock seedlings after grafting. A total of 26 stock seedlings were with 'c-bud'.
The relationship between the status of grafting buds and the CLas transmission results in the stock plants was analyzed. The success possibility of HLB transmission is directly related to the vitality of buds. Only one 'a-bud' seedling was HLB-negative even after 13 MAG, while CLas was not detected throughout in as many as seven seedlings (accounting for 26.92%) for the 'c-bud' group (Fig. 2b). In the first three assays (from 6 MAG to 8 MAG), 16.67% and 11.11% of plants with a-type buds and b-type buds were found successfully infected. However, CLas in all plants with c-type buds was failed to be detected until 9 MAG. Most 'a-bud' (70%) and 'b-bud' (66.67%) stock seedlings were CLas-positive for three to six times' detection. However, the detectable CLas titers for most c-type-bud seedlings (88.46%) were only observed in less than three times' assays.
Effect of different graft-inoculation methods
-
After graft-inoculation with CLas-infected buds, the CLas-positive rates increased until about 6 MAG and then stabilizes over time (Table 2). Statistical analysis showed that different grafting methods had a significant influence on the infection densities (P < 0.01). In all five time tests, the success rates of top grafting ('T' grafting and 'V' grafting, as shown inFig. 3b, c) were higher than those of side grafting (Fig. 3a), wherein 'T' grafting has the highest disease transmission efficiency which was significantly higher than those of side grafting and 'V' grafting (P < 0.001) in the four tests from 5 MAG to 8 MAG. However, there was no significant difference in the success rates of disease transmission between side grafting and 'V' grafting (P = 0.097). For the CLas titers in the samples of successfully infected plants, no significant difference was detected among three different grafting methods (P = 0.232), indicating that different grafting methods had little effect on CLas titers in the leaf midrib of successfully infected plants. The plants used as control were not detected to carry CLas at all detection time points.
Table 2. The successful transmission rate and effect of different grafting methods.
Time Grafting method Side grafting 'T' grafting 'V' grafting 4 MAG Success rate 16.7%ab 41.7%a 16.7%ab CLas concentration* 35.71 ± 25.83 269.40 ± 97.35 295.61 ± 168.07 Average Ct 25.65 ± 0.96 23.21 ± 0.39 22.78 ± 0.88 5 MAG Success rate 25.0%bc 83.3%a 41.7%b CLas concentration* 171.51 ± 138.89 139.30 ± 28.85 135.07 ± 29.65 Average Ct 25.03 ± 0.95 23.00 ± 0.23 22.76 ± 0.43 6 MAG Success rate 33.3%c 83.3%a 33.3%c CLas concentration* 78.29 ± 18.67 213.69 ± 74.35 232.99 ± 78.33 Average Ct 23.67 ± 0.39 24.66 ± 0.64 23.31 ± 0.22 7 MAG Success rate 33.3%bc 83.3%a 41.7%b CLas concentration* 107.38 ± 28.00 164.86 ± 29.64 266.92 ± 76.64 Average Ct 23.72 ± 0.53 23.78 ± 0.55 24.21 ± 0.53 8 MAG Success rate 33.3%bc 83.3%a 41.7%b CLas concentration* 204.82 ± 63.54 111.26 ± 18.72 83.67 ± 28.61 Average Ct 25.53 ± 1.48 25.25 ± 0.38 26.18 ± 0.54 MAG, Month-after-grafting. Statistic analysis was done horizontally in the table, indicating the differences among different grafting methods.
* The unit of CLas concentration is copy number per ng DNA. The significance analysis was performed with letter markers such as a, b, and c. The difference is not significant if the marked letters are the same, and vice versa.Effect of grafting bud numbers on infection densities and pathogen titers
-
With different numbers of diseased buds, the success rate of disease transmission increased with time and tended to be stable at the later stages (Table 3). The efficiency of CLas transmission to citrus plants was significantly influenced by the number of grafted diseased buds (P = 0.001). By contrast, the CLas transmission rates of two and three bud-grafting inoculations were significantly higher than that of one bud-grafting (P = 0.004 and P = 0.002, respectively). Wherein, the disease transmission rate of two-bud-grafting was significantly higher than that of three-bud-inoculation (P = 0.025). The two-bud and three-bud graft-inoculation have relatively higher efficiency in HLB transmission than one-bud-inoculation, although no significant difference was detected at 4 MAG. At 5 and 6 MAG, the success ratio of two-bud-grafting was higher than that of one-bud-grafting and three-bud-grafting. At 7 and 8 MAG, the success ratio of two-bud-grafting was significantly higher than that of three-bud-grafting, which in turn was significantly higher than that of one-bud-grafting. Similarly, there was no significant difference (P = 1.000) between the number of grafting buds and the CLas titers in the successfully graft-inoculated plants except for the one-bud-grafting at 8 MAG. In conclusion, the number of grafted buds had little effect on the titers of CLas in the affected plants, but had a very significant effect on the success rate of disease transmission, with two-bud-grafting had the highest efficiency. No CLas was detected in the control plants at all detection time points.
Table 3. The successful transmission rate and effect of the numbers of grafting buds on HLB transmission by grafting.
Time Numbers of buds One bud Two buds Three buds 4 MAG Success rate 13.3%ab 33.3%a 33.3%a CLas concentration* 35.71 ± 25.83 45.81 ± 14.51 231.58 ± 147.16 Average Ct 25.65 ± 0.96 25.19 ± 0.59 25.29 ± 1.74 5 MAG Success rate 20.0%b 80.0%a 66.7%a CLas concentration* 171.51 ± 138.89 153.61 ± 39.57 93.99 ± 16.63 Average Ct 25.03 ± 0.95 24.30 ± 0.48 24.39 ± 0.53 6 MAG Success rate 26.7%bc 73.3%a 53.3%ab CLas concentration* 78.29 ± 18.67 206.20 ± 37.25 158.53 ± 38.07 Average Ct 23.67 ± 0.39 24.62 ± 0.26 25.91 ± 0.69 7 MAG Success rate 26.7%c 93.3%a 66.7%b CLas concentration* 107.38 ± 28.00 180.34 ± 36.64 61.94 ± 12.32 Average Ct 23.72 ± 0.53 23.25 ± 0.51 24.19 ± 0.36 8 MAG Success rate 26.7%c 93.3%a 66.7%b CLas concentration* 204.82 ± 63.54 68.42 ± 14.07 55.99 ± 18.69 Average Ct 25.53 ± 1.48 26.52 ± 0.38 26.46 ± 0.51 MAG, Month-after-grafting. Statistic analysis was carried out horizontally in the table, indicating the differences among different number of buds.
* The unit of CLas concentration is copy number per ng DNA. -
Three grafting methods, including side grafting, 'T' grafting and 'V' grafting were used to insert CLas-infected scions onto the healthy stock seedlings. Side grafting (Fig. 3a) is performed on the lateral side of the stem of the stock plants. For side grafting, one, two or three scions were grafted on each seedling. 'T' grafting (Fig. 3b) is T-shaped grafting on the top of the seedling with only one scion on each (Fig. 3c).
Plant material and sample collection
-
The CLas-infected buds used as scions for grafting were collected from sweet orange (Citrus sinensis) plants in Huizhou, Guangdong, China (latitude 23°48'10" N, longitude 114°45'73" W). The grafted recipient seedlings were one-year-old upright sour tangerine (Citrus sunki Hort. ex Tanaka) seedlings with consistent good growth conditions. The seedlings were confirmed to be CLas-negative by qPCR. By contrast, the scions carried high concentration of CLas, with detected average Ct values of 21 ± 0.24.
The leaves of HLB-affected seedlings at 6 MAG were collected, and groups of the leaf midrib and branch bark samples with the weights of 0.1 g, 0.05 g, 0.025 g, 0.0125 g and 0.0063 g were weighed respectively. Each group had three replicates. DNA of each sample was extracted for pathogen content detection to explore the influence of sample quantity on DNA extraction efficiency and PCR detection of CLas.
All grafted plants with well grown buds were selected to compare the difference caused by grafting methods (side grafting, 'T' grafting and 'V' grafting) or bud numbers (one bud, two buds and three buds). In the first assay, the relationship between the growth status of donor buds after grafting and HLB transmission results of the receptor plants was evaluated at 6 MAG and thereafter monthly using 92 one-bud-side-grafted plants. For the second assay, the effects of different grafting methods on the success ratio of disease transmission and the concentration of CLas were investigated using 12 plants for each method. Leaves from each tree were sampled at 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 MAG. Additionally, four groups of tangerine seedlings, with 15 plants in each group, were selected to explore the influence of the number of diseased scions on the disease transmission effect. One, two or three diseased scions or healthy scions (as control) were side-grafted onto the seedlings of each group. The sampling time for this experiment was the same as previous. In the control groups, scion without CLas was grafted on seedlings by the corresponding methods.
DNA extraction and qPCR detection
-
A proper amount of leaf midrib or bark tissues were cut and further used for DNA extraction. DNA extraction was performed using the EZNATM High Performance Plant DNA Kit (Omega Bio-Tek, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All extracted DNA samples were quantified with the Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, CA, USA) and stored at −20 °C for further use. For each sample, 100 ng DNA was used for quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) using primers as described by Chen et al.[31]. The primers used for qPCR detection of CLas were HLB-4G (5'-AGTCGAGCGCGTATGCGA-3') /HLBr (5'-GCGTTATCCCGTAGAAAAAGCTAG-3')[42].
Statistical analysis
-
The standard curve equation (Y(Ct) = 3.31 lgx + 37.463) was used to calculate the relative titer of CLas (x) for each sample. Data are expressed as mean ± standard error (SE). When required, the data were subjected to statistical analysis by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan's new multiple range test using SPSS 13.0 software. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Cui X, Zhang J, Liu Y, Luo X, Deng X, et al. 2022. Comparison of different grafting methods on the effect of 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' transmission. Fruit Research 2:15 doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2022-0015
Comparison of different grafting methods on the effect of 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' transmission
- Received: 20 May 2022
- Accepted: 18 August 2022
- Published online: 29 September 2022
Abstract: Grafting is a commonly used method for citrus propagation and transmitting 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' (CLas), the putative causing agent of citrus Huanglongbing (HLB). Optimization of the grafting inoculation methods facilitates the material preparation in HLB research. Citrus buds with CLas were grafted onto healthy sour tangerine (Citrus sunki Hort. ex Tanaka) seedlings by different methods such as top grafting ('T' grafting and 'V' grafting) and side grafting (abdominal grafting). Along with the symptom observation, titers of CLas in the leaves were detected by RT-qPCR monthly. The correlation between the growth status of buds or different grafting methods and the success rate of HLB transmission were analyzed. Our results suggest that sufficient DNA could be extracted to accurately detect the CLas from even only 0.0125 g leaf midrib or branch bark. The probability of CLas transmission was higher in plants inoculated with buds in better growth conditions. The success rate of 'T' grafting was significantly higher than that of side grafting and 'V' grafting. Additionally, in terms of HLB transmission efficiency, the two-bud grafting scheme was superior to the single-bud and three-bud grafting schemes. In conclusion, the grafting combinations with the highest HLB transmission efficiency were screened to provide a methodological reference for the practice or research of grafting to obtain plant material.
-
Key words:
- citrus /
- grafting /
- Huanglongbing /
- inoculation /
- transmission