Search
2022 Volume 7
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal a new wood-rotting fungal species, Cyathus wenshanensis sp. nov. from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau

More Information
  • A new species of bird's nest fungus, Cyathus wenshanensis is proposed based on a combination of the morphological and molecular evidence. It is characterised by the obconical to cupulate basidiomata covered with hirsute hairs, striations on the outer and inner surface of the peridium, funicular peridioles, a trimitic hyphal system of peridium with generative hyphae having clamp connections, a dimitic hyphal system of peridiole middle, and subglobose, elliptical to ellipsoid-elongate, thick-walled basidiospores. Sequence of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) gene region was generated, and the phylogenetic analysis was performed with maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference methods. The phylogenetic analyses inferred from ITS dataset indicated that C. wenshanensis nested within the genus Cyathus, in which it formed a monophyletic lineage and grouped with C. albinus, C. amazonicus, C. badius, C. parvocinereus, C. pyristriatus and C. uniperidiolus.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Haller AV. 1768. Historia stirpium indigenarum Helvetiae inchoate. Sumptibus Societatis Typographicae 3:236

    Google Scholar

    [2]

    Persoon CH. 1801. Synopsis methodica fungorum. 706 pp.

    [3]

    Brodie HJ. 1975. The bird's nest fungi. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442632516

    [4]

    Gómez CL, Pérez-Silva E. 1988. Species of nidulariales (Gasteromycetes) common in México. Revista Mexicana de Micología 4:161−83

    doi: 10.33885/SF.1988.3.721

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Zhao RL, Desjardin DE, Soytong K, Hyde KD. 2008. A new species of bird’s nest fungi: characterisation of Cyathus subglobisporus sp. nov. based on morphological and molecular data. Persoonia 21:71−76

    doi: 10.3767/003158508X370578

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Lloyd CG. 1906. The Nidulariaceae or "Bird's Nest Fungi". Cincinnati, Mycological Writings 2:1−32

    Google Scholar

    [7]

    Brodie HJ. 1974. A new plicate Cyathus from India. Canadian Journal of Botany 52:247−49

    doi: 10.1139/b74-029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Brodie HJ, Sharma BM. 1980. Cyathus griseocarpus, a new bird's nest fungus from India. Botaniska Notiser 133:343−45

    Google Scholar

    [9]

    Miller OKJ, Miller HH. 1988. Gasteromycetes: morphological and development features with keys to the orders, families, and genera. Eureka, Canada: Mad River Press, Inc.

    [10]

    Das K, Zhao R. 2012. Bird's Nest fungi in India: a new record from Sikkim. In Biodiversity and Taxonomy, eds: Nayar NP, Verma RV. Delhi, India: Narendra Publishing House. pp. 61‒68

    [11]

    Das K, Zhao R. 2013. Nidula shingbaensis sp. nov., a new Bird's nest fungus from India. Mycotaxon 125:53−58

    doi: 10.5248/125.53

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Shinners-Carnelley TC, Szpacenko A, Tewari JP, Palcic MM. 2002. Enzymatic activity of Cyathus olla during solid state fermentation of canola roots. Phytoprotection 83:31−40

    doi: 10.7202/706227ar

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Blenis PV, Chow PS. 2005. Evaluating fungi from wood and canola for their ability to decompose canola stubble. Canadian Journal of Plant Pathology 27:259−67

    doi: 10.1080/07060660509507223

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kraisitudomsook N, Choeyklin R, Boonpratuang T, Pobkwamsuk M, Anaphon S, et al. 2022. Hidden in the tropics: Retiperidiolia gen. nov., a new genus of bird's nest fungi (Nidulariaceae), and a systematic study of the genus Mycocalia. Mycological Progress 21:56

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-022-01807-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Niranjan M, Singh RK. 2021. Cyathus striatus: a new record from Arunachal Pradesh and a checklist of Bird’s nest fungi in India. Studies in Fungi 6:168−74

    doi: 10.5943/sif/6/1/10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhou T. 2007. Chinese mycology: Geastraceae and Nidulariaceae. Vol. 36. Beijing: Science Press

    [17]

    Matheny PB, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo JM, et al. 2006. Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98:982−95

    doi: 10.3852/mycologia.98.6.982

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhao R, Jeewon R, Desjardin DE, Soytong K, Hyde KD. 2007. Ribosomal DNA phylogenies of Cyathus: is the current infrageneric classification appropriate? Mycologia 99:385−95

    doi: 10.3852/mycologia.99.3.385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Martin MP, da Cruz RHSF, Dueñas M, Baseia IG, Telleria MT. 2015. Cyathus lignilantanae sp. nov., a new species of bird’s nest fungi (Basidiomycota) from Cape Verde Archipelago. Phytotaxa 236:161−72

    doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.236.2.5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    da Silva MA, Barbosa MMB, Baseia IG, Malosso E. 2016. Novelties in Cyathus Basidiomycota: new species and a phylogenetic analysis. Nova Hedwigia 103:57−69

    doi: 10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2016/0332

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Kraisitudomsook N, Healy RA, Smith ME. 2021. Molecular systematics and taxonomic overview of the bird’s nest fungi (Nidulariaceae). Fungal Biology 125:693−703

    doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2021.04.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Zhao C, Wu Z. 2017. Ceriporiopsis kunmingensis sp. nov. (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) evidenced by morphological characters and phylogenetic analysis. Mycological Progress 16:93−100

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1259-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Kornerup A, Wanscher JH. 1978. Methuen Handbook of Colour. 3rd Edition. London, UK: Eyre Methuen

    [24]

    White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. pp. 315–22. http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1

    [25]

    Accioly T, Cruz RHSF, Assis NM, Ishikawa NK, Hosaka K, et al. 2018. Amazonian bird’s nest fungi (Basidiomycota): Current knowledge and novelties on Cyathus species. Mycoscience 59:331−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2017.11.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    da Cruz RHSF, Góis JS, Martin MP, Hosaka K, Baseia IG. 2017. Cyathus aurantogriseocarpus sp. nov. Persoonia 38:322−23

    Google Scholar

    [27]

    da Cruz RHSF, Baseia IG, Hosaka K. 2018. Rediscovery of Cyathus badius, an 'extinct' species from the Bonin Islands, Japan. Mycoscience 59:193−99

    doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2017.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Vats A, Mishra S. 2021. An insight into transcriptome of Cyathus bulleri for lignocellulase expression on wheat bran. Archives of Microbiology 203:3727−36

    doi: 10.1007/s00203-021-02326-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Vu D, Groenewald M, de Vries M, Gehrmann T, Stielow B, et al. 2019. Large-scale generation and analysis of filamentous fungal DNA barcodes boosts coverage for kingdom fungi and reveals thresholds for fungal species and higher taxon delimitation. Studies in Mycology 92:135−54

    doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2018.05.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    da Cruz RHSF. 2017. Revisão morfológica e molecular do gênero Cyathus Haller (Nidulariaceae, Agaricales, Basidiomycota).

    [31]

    Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Burgess TI, Hardy GESJ, Crane C, et al. 2016. Fungal Planet description sheets: 469–557. Persoonia 37:218−403

    doi: 10.3767/003158516x694499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Sutthisa W, Sanoamuang N. 2020. Morphological and DNA-based classification of Cyathus sp. isolates from Thailand (Basidiomycota, Nidulariaceae). Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 14:1769−77

    doi: 10.22207/JPAM.14.3.15

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Richter C, Helaly SE, Thongbai B, Hyde KD, Stadler M. 2016. Pyristriatins A and B: Pyridino-Cyathane Antibiotics from the Basidiomycete Cyathus cf. striatus. Journal of Natural Products 79:1684−88

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jnatprod.6b00194

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Hay CRJ, Thorn RG, Jacobs CR. 2019. Taxonomic survey of Agaricomycetes (Fungi: Basidiomycota) in Ontario tallgrass prairies determined by fruiting body and soil rDNA sampling. The Canadian Field-Naturalist 132:407

    doi: 10.22621/cfn.v132i4.2027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Boonmee S, Wanasinghe DN, Calabon MS, Huanraluek N, Chandrasiri SKU, et al. 2021. Fungal diversity notes 1387–1511: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 111:1−335

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00489-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Hall TA. 1999. Bioedit: A user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95−98

    Google Scholar

    [37]

    Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.

    [38]

    Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenetics: an approach using bootstrap. Evolution 39:783−791

    doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Miller MA, Holder MT, Vos R, Midford PE, Liebowitz T, et al. 2009. The CIPRES Portals. CIPRES. www.phylo.org/sub_sections/portal. Accessed on 04 Aug 2009

    [40]

    Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Sweden

    [41]

    Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19:1572−74

    doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Trierveiler-Pereira L, Gomes-Silva AC, Baseia IG. 2009. Notes on gasteroid fungi of the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. Mycotaxon 110:73−80

    doi: 10.5248/110.73

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    da Cruz RHSF, Barbosa MMB, Baseia IG. 2013. Cyathus badius and C. earlei reported from the Brazilian Atlantic rainforest. Mycotaxon 121:365−69

    doi: 10.5248/121.365

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    da Cruz RHSF, Baseia IG. 2014. Four new Cyathus species (Nidulariaceae, Basidiomycota, Fungi) from the semi-arid region of Brazil1. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 141:173−80

    doi: 10.3159/TORREY-D-13-00067.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Hyde KD, Hongsanan S, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, McKenzie EHC, et al. 2016. Fungal diversity notes 367‒490: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 80:1−270

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0373-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Góis JS, da Cruz RHSF, Nascimento PH, Baseia IG. 2021. A new species and new records of Cyathus (Agaricales, Basidiomycota) from a National Park in Bahia, Brazil. New Zealand Journal of Botany 59:90−101

    doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2020.1757469

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Zhao R, Desjardin DE, Soytong K, Hyde KD. 2006. Proposed synonyms in Cyathus. Mycotaxon 97:327−36

    Google Scholar

    [48]

    Brodie HJ. 1973. A new species of Cyathus from the Philippines. Canadian Journal of Botany 51:1393−94

    doi: 10.1139/b73-174

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Sharma B. 2016. Genus Cyathus Haller ex Pers. (Agaricomycetes) from Eastern Himalaya. Kavaka 47:20−26

    Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhou T, Zhao L, Zhao R, Chen Y. 2004. Bird's nest fungi from China. Fungal Diversity 17:243−51

    Google Scholar

    [51]

    Brodie HJ. 1967. Cyathus africanus, a previously undescribed bird’s nest fungus. Canadian Journal of Botany 45:1653−55

    doi: 10.1139/b67-171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Yang B, Yu J, Zhou T. 2002. Two new species of the genus Cyathus from western China. Mycosystema 21:313−15

    Google Scholar

    [53]

    Tulasne LR, Tulasne C. 1844. Recherches sur l’organisation et le mode de fructification des champignons de la tribu des Nidulariaceae, suivies d’un essai monographique. Annales des Sciences Naturelles, Botanique, Series III 1: 41‒107.

    [54]

    Dorjey K, Kumar S, Sharma YP. 2013. Cyathus olla from the cold desert of Ladakh. Mycosphere 4:256−59

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/4/2/8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Brodie HJ. 1970. A previously unnamed species of Cyathus from the Cypress Hills, Alberta. Canadian Journal of Botany 48:749−50

    doi: 10.1139/b70-103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Wu F, Yuan H, Zhou L, Yuan Y, Cui B, et al. 2020. Polypore diversity in South China. Mycosystema 39:653−82

    Google Scholar

    [57]

    Dai Y, Yang Z, Cui B, Wu G, Yuan H, et al. 2021. Diversity and systematics of the important macrofungi in Chinese forests. Mycosystema 40:770−805

    Google Scholar

    [58]

    Vishwakarma P, Singh P, Tripathi NN. 2017. Diversity of macrofungi and its distribution pattern of Gorakhpur District, Uttar Pradesh, India. Studies in Fungi 2:92−105

    doi: 10.5943/sif/2/1/11

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Jagadish BR, Sridhar KR, Dattaraj HR. 2019. Macrofungal assemblage with two tree species in scrub jungles of south-west India. Studies in Fungi 4:79−89

    doi: 10.5943/sif/4/1/10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Lubrano Lavadera A, Mazzella V, D’Antonio C. 2019. An updated checklist of macrofungi of Vivara island (gulf of Naples ‒ Italy). Studies in Fungi 4:205−15

    doi: 10.5943/sif/4/1/22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Roy N, Jha DK, Dutta AK. 2022. A checklist of the macrofungi of North East India. Studies in Fungi 7:1

    doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Duan ZY, Yu J, Zhao CL. 2022. Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal a new wood-rotting fungal species, Cyathus wenshanensis sp. nov. from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Studies in Fungi 7:8 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0008
    Duan ZY, Yu J, Zhao CL. 2022. Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal a new wood-rotting fungal species, Cyathus wenshanensis sp. nov. from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Studies in Fungi 7:8 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0008

Figures(5)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(4679) PDF downloads(559)

Other Articles By Authors

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal a new wood-rotting fungal species, Cyathus wenshanensis sp. nov. from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau

Studies in Fungi  7 Article number: 8  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: A new species of bird's nest fungus, Cyathus wenshanensis is proposed based on a combination of the morphological and molecular evidence. It is characterised by the obconical to cupulate basidiomata covered with hirsute hairs, striations on the outer and inner surface of the peridium, funicular peridioles, a trimitic hyphal system of peridium with generative hyphae having clamp connections, a dimitic hyphal system of peridiole middle, and subglobose, elliptical to ellipsoid-elongate, thick-walled basidiospores. Sequence of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) gene region was generated, and the phylogenetic analysis was performed with maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony and Bayesian inference methods. The phylogenetic analyses inferred from ITS dataset indicated that C. wenshanensis nested within the genus Cyathus, in which it formed a monophyletic lineage and grouped with C. albinus, C. amazonicus, C. badius, C. parvocinereus, C. pyristriatus and C. uniperidiolus.

    • The genus Cyathus (Nidulariaceae, Nidulariales) was first introduced by Haller[1] and later was adopted by Persoon[2], typified by C. striatus (Huds.) Willd. Cyathus together with Crucibulum Tul. & C. Tul., Mycocalia J.T. Palmer, Nidula V.S. White, and Nidularia Fr., are commonly known as bird's nest fungi due to their cup-like basidiomata resembling bird nest and lenticular periodioles resembling eggs[35]. It is characterized by having deeper or cuped, inverted bell-like basidiomata covered with shaggy or tomentose hairs on the outside; peridium composed of three layers of tissues, inside peridium filled with a number of dark-colored, small, hard lentil-shaped peridioles attached with funicular cords; colorless, thin-walled or thick-walled, smooth basidiospores[3,611]. The species of Cyathus are saprobic, usually growing in decaying wood, on manure or directly on soil are a cosmopolitan group and have a rich diversity related to the high diversity of plants growing in boreal, temperate, subtropical, and tropical regions[3,5,1214]. Both MycoBank database (www.MycoBank.org; 23 June 2022) and Index Fungorum (www.indexfungorum.org; 23 June 2022) register 204 specific and infraspecific names in the genus Cyathus, but the actual number of species are about 60[15], including 35 species from China[5,16].

      Molecular systematic studies of the genus Cyathus have been carried out previously[14,17,18]. An overview of the phylogeny of the Agaricales presented based on a multilocus analysis of a six-gene region supermatrix revealed that the family Nidulariaceae was sister to Cystodermateae, in which Cyathus striatus and Crucibulum laeve grouped together within Nidulariaceae[17]. Phylogenetic relationships within the genus Cyathus (bird's nest fungi) were investigated with neighbor joining, maximum likelihood, weighted maximum parsimony and MrBayes analyses of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and large subunit (LSU) of ribosomal DNA sequences datasets, in which the morphological characters of the peridium plications and variations in peridium hair anatomy, peridiole structure and fruit-body color were not supported by the molecular data, while the ITS and LSU datasets supported the recognition of three infrageneric groups herein named the ollum, pallidum and striatum groups[18]. Phylogenetic analyses based on ITS and LSU ribosomal DNA sequences revealed that three taxa C. cheliensis, C. gansuensis, and C. megasporus were respectively accepted as synonyms of C. limbatus, C. pygmaeus, and C. poeppigii[5]. On the basis of the morphological and molecular data, Martin et al.[19] discussed affinities among Cyathus species, which showed that this group formed a monophyletic group with high support. Phylogenetic reconstruction of Cyathus species based on alignment of 641 nucleotides of the ITS region indicated that three new species as C. batistae and C. apiculatus, C. pedunculatus were proposed, and discussed relationships with other species of Cyathus[20]. Phylogenetic relationships of bird's nest fungi investigated with four commonly used loci (ITS, LSU, translation elongation factor (TEF), and RNA polymerase II second largest subunit (RPB2)) revealed that the family Nidulariaceae was resolved as a monophyletic group with Squamanitaceae as a potential sister taxon, and suggested that species concepts needed to be revisited and refined throughout Nidulariaceae and several bird's nest fungi species had global geographical distributions, whereas others may have more limited ranges, and the basic morphological characters of bird's nest fungi had likely been lost or gained multiple times[21]. The phylogenetic study using five loci (ITS, LSU, SSU, translation elongation factor 1-alpha (TEF1) and RPB2) revealed that a new genus Retiperidiolia to accommodate this phylogenetically and morphologically unique bird's nest fungus lineage, in which Cyathus formed a monophyletic lineage and then was sister to the genus Retiperidiolia[14].

    • The fresh fruiting bodies of the bird's nest fungi were collected from Wenshan (Yunnan Province, P. R. China). The fresh specimens were dried in an electric food dehydrator at 40 °C, then sealed and stored in an envelope bag and deposited in the herbarium of the Southwest Forestry University (SWFC, Kunming, Yunnan Province, P.R. China).

      The macromorphological descriptions were based on field notes and photos captured in the field and lab. The macromorphological descriptions are based on Brodie[3]. The micromorphological data were obtained from the dried specimens and observed under Nikon Eclipse E100 light microscope following the methods of Zhao & Wu[22]. Color terms follow Kornerup & Wanscher[23]. Drawings were made with the aid of a fungus plotter. The measurements and drawings were made from slide preparations stained with Cotton Blue (0.1 mg aniline blue dissolved in 60 g pure lactic acid), Melzer's reagent (3 g potassium iodide, 1 g crystalline iodine, 44 g chloral hydrate, aq. dest. 40 ml) and 5% potassium hydroxide. In presenting spore size data, 5% of the measurements excluded from each end of the range are shown in parentheses. The following abbreviations are used: KOH = 5% potassium hydroxide; CB = cotton blue; CB– = acyanophilous; IKI = Melzer's reagent; IKI– = non-amyloid and non-dextrinoid; L = mean spore length (arithmetic average of all spores); W = mean spore width (arithmetic average of all spores); Q = L/W ratio; n = number of spores/measured from a given number of specimens.

    • The CTAB rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd, Beijing, China) was used to obtain genomic DNA from dried fungal specimens, according to the manufacturer's instructions. The ITS region was amplified with the primer pair ITS5 and ITS4[24]. The PCR cycling procedure for ITS was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company (Yunnan Province, P.R. China). All newly generated sequences were deposited in GenBank (Table 1).

      Table 1.  List of species, specimens, and GenBank accession numbers of ITS sequences used in this study.

      Species nameSample no.GenBank
      accession no.
      References
      Crucibulum laeveSWFC 21261DQ463357Zhao et al.[18]
      Cyathus africanusDAOM 200370[T]DQ463347Zhao et al.[18]
      C. albinusUFRN-Fungos 2239KY176371Accioly et al.[25]
      C. amazonicusURM 80036[T]KY495280Accioly et al.[25]
      C. amazonicusUFRN-Fungos 2798KY176375Accioly et al.[25]
      C. annulatusMichaelKuo-8200901MT444076Kraisitudomsook et al.[21]
      C. apiculatusUFRN:Fungos 1448KT365516da Silva et al.[20]
      C. aurantogriseocarpusUFRN:Fungos:2798KX966026da Cruz et al.[26]
      C. badiusKH:JPN15-1321KX906250da Cruz et al.[27]
      C. batistaeUFRN:Fungos 1449KT365515daSilva et al.[20]
      C. berkeleyanusSWFC 20789DQ463355Zhao et al.[18]
      C. bulleriDAOMC 195062MK020156Vats & Mishra[28]
      C. cannaCBS 370.80MH861275Vu et al.[29]
      C. colensoiDAOM 200423DQ463344Zhao et al.[18]
      C. crassimurusDAOM 200372[T]DQ463350Zhao et al.[18]
      C. discoideusAB 7831KY652080da Cruz[30]
      C. gansuensisSWFC 20880[T]DQ463348Zhao et al.[18]
      C. gansuensisStrain 69KC869661da Cruz et al.[27]
      C. gracilisAB7873KY652081da Cruz[30]
      C. hookeriSWFC 20799DQ463346Zhao et al.[18]
      C. hortensisUFRN:Fungos:1819KX906252da Cruz et al.[27]
      C. ibericusAH:48138KX858598Crous et al.[31]
      C. ibericusAH:48137[T]KX858597Crous et al.[31]
      C. intermediusUFRN:Fungos 1033KT365519da Silva et al.[20]
      C. jiayuguanensisSWFC 20846[T]DQ463341Zhao et al.[18]
      C. lignilantanaeMA Fungi 87327NR_154827da Cruz et al.[27]
      C. limbatusUFRN-Fungos 2238KY176373Accioly et al.[25]
      C. magnomuralisUFRN:Fungos:1817KX906251da Cruz et al.[27]
      C. minimusAB7868KY652082da Cruz[30]
      C. novae-zeelandiaePDD-76442MT444096Kraisitudomsook et al.[21]
      C. ollaPDD-86833MT444086Kraisitudomsook et al.[21]
      C. ollaBPI 727227DQ463345Zhao et al.[18]
      C. pallidusKKUITN2KU202745Sutthisa & Sanoamuang[32]
      C. pallidusKKUITN3KU202751Sutthisa & Sanoamuang[32]
      C. parvocinereusUFRN:Fungos:1814KX906253da Cruz et al.[27]
      C. pedunculatusUFRN:Fungos 403KT365518da Silva et al.[20]
      C. poeppigiicp-457KT962176da Silva et al.[20]
      C. pyristriatusMFLUCC:14-0770KU865513Richter et al.[33]
      C. renweiiSWFC 201406[T]DQ463352Zhao et al.[18]
      C. setosusDAOM 200815[T]DQ463349Zhao et al.[18]
      C. stercoreusNK-08MT444037Kraisitudomsook et al.[21]
      C. stercoreusDM4KY706156Hay et al.[34]
      C. striatusNK-61MT444056Kraisitudomsook et al.[21]
      C. subglobisporusBBH-14815MT444063Kraisitudomsook et al.[21]
      C. subglobisporuBBH18348EF613553Zhao et al.[5]
      C. triplexSWFC 21077DQ463353Zhao et al.[18]
      C. uniperidiolusAMH:10196MN398297Boonmee et al.[35]
      C. wenshanensisCLZhao 20202[T]ON795104This study
      Nidula niveotomentosaSWFC 3000DQ463358Zhao et al.[18]

      Sequencher 4.6 (GeneCodes, Ann Arbor, MI, USA) was used to assemble and edit the generated sequence reads. Sequences were aligned in MAFFT 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/) using the 'G-INS-I' strategy and manually adjusted in BioEdit[36]. Crucibulum laeve (Huds.) Kambly and Nidula niveotomentosa (Henn.) Lloyd were selected as an outgroup for the phylogenetic analysis of the ITS phylogenetic tree[25].

      Maximum parsimony (MP), Maximum Likelihood (ML) and Bayesian Inference (BI) analyses were applied to the ITS dataset sequences. Approaches to phylogenetic analyses followed[22]. MP analysis was performed in PAUP* version 4.0b10[37]. All of the characters were equally weighted and gaps were treated as missing data. Trees were inferred using the heuristic search option with TBR branch swapping and 1000 random sequence additions. Maxtrees were set to 5000, branches of zero length were collapsed and all most-parsimonious trees were saved. Clade robustness was assessed using bootstrap (BT) analysis with 1,000 replicates[38]. Descriptive tree statistics tree length (TL), the consistency index (CI), the retention index (RI), the rescaled consistency index (RC) and the homoplasy index (HI) were calculated for each most-parsimonious tree generated. ML was inferred using RAxML-HPC2 through the Cipres Science Gateway (www.phylo.org)[39]. Branch support (BS) for ML analysis was determined by 1000 bootstrap replicates and evaluated under the gamma model.

      MrModeltest 2.3[40] was used to determine the best-fit evolution model for the dataset for Bayesian Inference (BI). Bayesian Inference was performed with MrBayes 3.1.2 with a general time reversible (GTR+I+G) model of DNA substitution and a gamma distribution rate variation across sites[41]. Four Markov chains were used in each of two runs from random starting trees for 1.5 million generations (Fig. 1), with trees and parameters sampled every 100 generations. The first quarter of the generations were discarded as burn-in. A majority rule consensus tree of all remaining trees and posterior probabilities were calculated. Branches were considered significantly supported if they received maximum likelihood bootstrap value (BS) of > 70%, a maximum parsimony bootstrap value (BT) of > 70%, or Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) of > 0.95.

      Figure 1. 

      Maximum parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of the new species and related species in genus Cyathus based on ITS sequences. Branches are labelled with maximum likelihood bootstrap value > 70%, parsimony bootstrap value > 50% and Bayesian posterior probabilities > 0.95, respectively. The present species are in bold.

    • The ITS dataset (Fig. 1) included sequences from 49 fungal specimens representing 42 species. The dataset had an aligned length of 805 characters, of which 270 characters were constant, 232 were variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 303 parsimony-informative. The MP analysis yielded one equally parsimonious trees (TL = 1211, CI = 0.6474, HI = 0.3526, RI = 0.7855, RC = 0.5086). Best model for the ITS dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis: GTR+I+G, lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1). The bayesian and ML analyses resulted in a similar topology as MP analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.009975 (BI), and the effective sample size (ESS) across the two runs was double the average ESS (avg ESS) = 248. The phylogenetic tree (Fig. 1) inferred from ITS sequences revealed that C. wenshanensis nested within the genus Cyathus, in which it formed a monophyletic lineage and grouped with C. albinus, C. amazonicus, C. badius, C. parvocinereus, C. pyristriatus and C. uniperidiolus.

    • Cyathus wenshanensis Z.Y. Duan & C.L. Zhao, sp. nov. Figs 25.

      Figure 2. 

      Basidiomata of Cyathus wenshanensis. (a) Basidiomata, (b) outer corving of peridium. Scale bars: (a) = 1 cm, (b) = 1 mm.

      Figure 3. 

      Peridiole of Cyathus wenshanensis. (a) Peridioles with funicular cord, (b) transversal section of peridiole showing single-layered cortex. Scale bars: (a) = 1 mm, (b) = 1 mm.

      Figure 4. 

      Microscopic structures of Cyathus wenshanensis. (a) Outer wall of peridium, (b) inner wall of peridium, (c) three-layered peridium, (d) the structure of the hair. Scale bars: (a)–(d) = 10 μm.

      Figure 5. 

      Microscopic structures of Cyathus wenshanensis. (a) Basidiospores. (b) Funicular cord. (c) The internal structure of peridiole. Scale bars: (a)–(c) = 10 μm.

      Index Fungorum number: IF844702; Facesoffungi number: FoF12564

      Etymology – wenshanensis (Lat.): referring to the provenance (Wenshan) of the type specimens.

      Basidiomata obconical to cupulate, 5–15 mm high, 5–10 mm wide at the mouth, without expanding at the top or tapering abruptly at the base; the base usually attached to the substrate by a slightly conspicuous emplacement, brown (5E6) to beige (4C3); exoperidium brown (5E6), hirsute, external wall striate near the mouth, 0.4–0.7 mm between folds, covered with brown (5E6) to dark brown (7F6), irregular and flexible tufts of hair; hair hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thick-walled (wall up to 0.5–2 μm thick), 3.5–13.5 µm in diameter; endoperidium greyish brown (8F3) to black brown (7F4), conspicuously striate with 0.4–0.8 mm between the groves; mouth finely fimbriate; peridium walls consist of three different layers: (1) outer wall layer, hyphal system trimitic, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH; generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless to pale brown, slight thick-walled, frequently branched, 1.5–4 µm in diameter; skeletal hyphae colorless to pale brown, thick-walled, unbranched, 2–4 µm in diameter; binding hyphae colorless to pale brown, thick-walled, unbranched, 1.5–2.5 µm in diameter; (2) inner wall layer, hyphal system trimitic, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH; generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless to pale brown, slight thick-walled, rarely branched, 2–4 µm in diameter; skeletal hyphae colorless to pale brown, thick-walled, unbranched, 2.5–4.5 µm in diameter; binding hyphae colorless to pale brown, thick-walled, rarely branched, 1.5–3 µm in diameter; (3) pseudopare-chymatous layer.

      Peridioles depressed, shiny, angular to irregular, suborbicular, broadly ellipsoid to ovoid, dark grey (8F1) to black (6F3), surface smooth to wrinkled, tunica present, often inconspicuous, cortex single-layered, 2.5–3.5 × 2–3 mm; funicular cord present, funiculus hyphae with clamp connections, thick-walled, unbranched, pale yellowish, 1–3.5 µm in diameter; hyphal system of peridiole middle dimitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thin-walled, frequently branched, with oil drops inside, 1–3 µm in diameter, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH; skeletal hyphae colorless, slight thick-walled, unbranched, with oil drops inside, 1.5–4 µm in diameter, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Basidiospores subglobose, elliptical to ellipsoid-elongate, colorless, smooth, thick-walled (wall up to 1–5 μm thick), CB–, IKI–, with inclusions or oil-like globule, without apiculus, (10–)11–21(–22) × 9–14(–15) µm, L = 16.34 µm, W = 11.51 µm, Q = 1.4 (n = 60/1). Basidia not observed.

      Known distribution – Thus far known only from China.

      Material examined – China. Yunnan Province, Wenshan, Pingba Town, Huguangqing Village, 23.26°N, 104.06°E, on the fallen branch of angiosperm, 12 August 2020, collected by C.L. Zhao. Specimen voucher number: CLZhao 20202 (SWFC 020202).

    • In the present study, C. wenshanensis sp. nov. is described based on the phylogenetic analyses and morphological characteristics.

      Phylogenetically, the molecular systematics and taxonomic overview of the bird's nest fungi revealed that the family Nidulariaceae was resolved as a monophyletic group with Squamanitaceae as a potential sister taxon, in which Cyathus and Crucibulum each formed its own independent and well-supported clade, and Nidula and Nidularia formed a clade together, but each genus is polyphyletic[21]. In the present study, C. wenshanensis nests within the genus Cyathus located in the family Nidulariaceae, in which it forms a monophyletic lineage and then groups with taxa C. albinus, C. amazonicus, C. badius, C. parvocinereus, C. pyristriatus and C. uniperidiolus. However, morphologically C. albinus differs from C. wenshanensis by having the golden blond to dark blond exoperidium, brownish gray peridioles with double-layered cortex, and basidiospores with conspicuous apiculous[25]. C. amazonicus differs in having very dark brown to grayish dark brown exoperidium and and gray, shiny endoperidium[42]. C. badius differs in having the smooth exoperidium, light brown to orange endoperidium, ovoid basidiospores[43]. C. parvocinereus differs in having the campanulate, smaller basidiomata (4–7 × 3.5–5 mm), pearl grey to brightness silvery endoperidium and greyish brown to grey peridioles with double-layered cortex[44]. C. pyristriatus differs in its clavate basidiomata with yellowish-brown or buff exoperidium, grey to dark grey endoperidium, greyish-brown peridioles, and ovoid basidiospores[45]. C. uniperidiolus distinct from C. wenshanensis in having the globose to sub-globose basidiomata with serrate margin at mouth, smooth peridium walls, and globose, smooth peridioles[35] (see Table 2).

      Table 2.  The comparison among Cyathus wenshanensis and phylogenetically related species.

      C. wenshanensisC. albinusC. amazonicusC. badiusC. parvocinereusC. pyristriatusC. uniperidiolus
      BasidiomataSize (high
      × wide)
      5–15 × 5–10 mm6–8.5 × 5–6.52 mm9–11 × 5–7 mm8–10 × 5–8 mm4–7 × 3.5–5 mm5.5–7 × 4–6 mm2–12 × 2–3.5 mm
      ShapeObconical to
      cupulate
      InfundibuliformObconicalInfundibuliformCampanulateClavate to broadly obconicGlobose to sub-globose
      ExoperidiumColourBrownGolden blond to dark blondVery dark brown to grayish dark brownBrownReddish brownYellowish-brown or buffDark brown
      SurfaceStrigose Tufts; striate, 0.4–0.7 mmStrigose tufts; striate; 0.3–0.5 mmStrigose tufts; striateShaggy, wooly tufts; smooth to striate;
      0.3 mm
      Strigose tufts; striate; 0.4–0.5 mmshaggy or fluffy hairsSmooth to velvety
      MouthFimbriateFimbriateFimbriateFimbriateFimbriateSerrate
      EndoperidiumColourGreyish brown to black brownGrayish brownGray to brownish grayLight brown to orangePlatinumGrey to dark greyDark brown
      SurfaceStriate, 0.4–0.8 mmStriate, 0.3–0.6 mmStriateSmooth to minutely striate; 0.5 mmStriate; 0.5 mmStriateSmooth
      PeridiolesShapeLentil-shapedLentil-shapedLentil-shapedLentil-shapedLentil-shapedLentil-shapedGlobose
      Size2–3.5 mm1.8–2.6 mm1.7–3 mm2–2.5 mm1–2 mm3–3.5 mm2–2.5 mm
      ColorDark grey to blackBrownish grayDark grayLight grey to blackGreyish brown to greyGreyish-brown to dark greyBlack
      CortexSingle layeredDouble layeredSingle layeredSingle layeredDouble layeredDouble layered
      BasidiosporesShapeSubglobose, elliptical to ellipsoid-elongate; apiculum absentOvoid to ellipsoid; apiculus presentSubglobose to broadly ellipsoidSubglobose, ovoid to ellipticalelliptical, globose; apiculum absentOvoid, subglobose, ellipsoid to broadly ellipsoidOval, sub-globose, broadly ellipsoid to ellipsoid-elongate
      Size11–21 × 9–14 µm14.8–20 × 10.4–14.3 µm14–19 × 12–16 µm13–19 × 9–11 µm11.43–17.78 × 9–15.24 µm14–17 × 8–10 µm14.2–28.7 × 11.7–23.7 µm
      Walls1–5 μm thick0.8–1.3 μm thickthick-walled1.9–3.2 μm thick2–3.5 μm thick1.5–3 μm thickthick-walled
      DistributionChinaBrazilAmazon rainforestJapan, BrazilBrazilThailandIndia
      ReferencePresent studyAccioly et al.[25]Trierveiler-Pereira et al.[42]da Cruz et al.[43]da Cruz & Baseia[44]Hyde et al.[45]Boonmee et al.[35]

      Morphologically, six taxa of Cyathus as C. apiculatus, C. hortensis, C. limbatus, C. lignilantanae, C. pedunculatus, and C. poeppigii are similar to C. wenshanensis on the basis of the character by having the obvious stripes on the inner and outer walls of peridium. However, C. apiculatus differs from C. wenshanensis by the basidiomata being expanded at the mouth and abruptly tapering to the base, silvery endoperidium, smaller peridioles (1–1.5 × 1.5–2 mm), and longer basidiospores (22–37 × 10–22 μm)[20]; C. hortensis is distinguished from C. wenshanensis by its basidiomata constricting abruptly at the base and forming a slender stipe, cinnamon exoperidium, smaller peridioles (1.2–2 × 1–1.5 mm) with double-layered cortex, and ovoid, wider basidiospores (17–34 × 13–20 μm)[44]; C. limbatus differs from C. wenshanensis by its double-layered peridioles, and basidiospores with apiculus[46]; C. lignilantanae is different from C. wenshanensis by having a reddish brown exoperidium, brownish grey to greyish brown, smaller peridioles (2.1–2.3 × 1.8–2 mm) with double-layered cortex[19]; C. pedunculatus is separated from C. wenshanensis by having the basidiomata abruptly tapering in the base forming a conspicuous pedicel, pale yellow to dark blond exoperidium, double-layered cortex, brownish grey, smaller peridioles (1.5–2 × 1–1.5 mm), and larger basidiospores (25–34 × 22–29 μm)[20]; C. poeppigii is distinguished from C. wenshanensis by having the narrowly obconical basidiomata with incurved mouths and a slender stipe at the base, and dark brown, smaller peridioles (1.5–2 mm) with double cortex, and larger basidiospores (30–45 × 18–30 μm)[47].

      Several taxa, Cyathus batistae, C. discoideus, C. gracilis, C. hookeri, C. magnomuralis, C. renweii and C. triplex are similar to C. wenshanensis based on the character having the fimbriate of basidiomata mouth. However, C. batistae differs from C. wenshanensis by its expanded mouth of basidiomata, with the stipe, smooth exoperidium wall, double-layered cortex peridioles, and smaller basidiospores (9–13 × 5–8 μm) with apiculus[20]; C. discoideus differs from C. wenshanensis by having grey brown, smaller peridioles (1.56–2.16 × 1.41–1.74 mm)[30]; C. gracilis is distinguished from C. wenshanensis by the basidiomata with slender base, umber to rusty outer surface of peridium, double-layered cortex peridioles, and basidiospores with apical notch[48]; C. hookeri differs from C. wenshanensis by its smooth peridium walls, and smaller basidiospores (9–13 × 5–8 μm)[49]; C. magnomuralis is distinguished from C. wenshanensis by having the dark blond exoperidium, smaller peridioles (1–1.5 × 1–1.5 mm) with double-layered cortex, and ovoid, larger basidiospores (27–49 × 23–41 μm) with small apiculus[44]; C. renweii differs from C. wenshanensis by its greyish peridioles with the brown tunica, and longer basidiospores (21–31 × 10.5–13.5 μm)[50]; C. triplex is separated from C. wenshanensis by its smaller basidiomata (5–8 × 4.5–5 mm) with the slender base orbicular, flattened peridioles with double-layered cortex, and basidiospores with the apical notch[25].

      Eight species of the genus Cyathus as C. africanus, C. colensoi, C. gansuensis, C. ibericus, C. jiayuguanensis, C. novae-zeelandiae, C. olla, and C. pallidus are similar to C. wenshanensis in light of the characteristics of having single-layered cortex peridioles. However, C. africanus differs from C. wenshanensis by its peridium walls with woolly hairs, silvery peridioles, and broadly ovate, smaller basidiospores (8.5–12 × 6.5–8.5 μm) with apiculus[51]; C. colensoi differs from C. wenshanensis by its smooth peridium walls, and ovoid, smaller basidiospores (8.5–11.5 × 7–8.5 μm)[30,49]; C. gansuensis differs from C. wenshanensis by its narrow base basidiomata with grayish to dark smoke-gray interior, grayish, smaller peridioles (1.5–2 × 0.8–1.5 mm), and ovoid basidiospores[52]; C. ibericus differs in its whitish to pale brownish grey external peridium with woolly hairs, smaller peridioles (0.8–1.2 mm diam), and ovoid, smaller basidiospores (7–9 × 5–6 μm)[30]; C. jiayuguanensis differs from C. wenshanensis by its basidiomata with the short stipe, smoke-gray peridioles, and ovoid, smaller basidiospores (8–11.5 × 7–8.5 μm)[52]; C. novae-zeelandiae differs in C. wenshanensis by its basidiomata abruptly constricted into a stipe, peridioles with white tunica, and smaller basidiospores (11–13 × 5–6 μm)[4,53]; C. olla differs from C. wenshanensis by its peridium with tomentose outside, silver, smooth inside, pure silver peridioles, and the smaller basidiospores (9.8–11.2 × 6.4–8 μm)[54]; C. pallidus differs from C. wenshanensis by its smaller basidiospores (6.8–14.5 × 6–8.1 μm)[32].

      Cyathus annulatus, C. aurantogriseocarpus, C. minimus, and C. stercoreus are similar to C. wenshanensis inferred from the characteristics of having thick-walled basidiospores without apiculus. However, C. annulatus is separated from C. wenshanensis by its expanded peridium at the top, ochraceous-tawny exoperidium, pale buff inner surface, subtriangular peridioles, and the striking dark-brown ring at the mouth[55]; C. aurantogriseocarpus differs from C. wenshanensis by the orange-grey exoperidium with long tomentum, brownish grey, smaller peridioles (1.5–1.75 × 1.2–1.5 mm) with double-layered cortex, and larger basidiospores (32.5–47 × 22.5–28.5 μm)[26]; C. minimus differs from C. wenshanensis by the clay brown exoperidium, yellowish brown endoperidium, and reddish brown, coffee or brown tobacco, smaller peridioles (1.3–1.37 × 1.13–1.23 mm)[30]; C. stercoreus differs in its smooth peridium walls, double-layered cortex peridioles and larger basidiospores (30–41 × 25–31 μm)[4].

      The family Nidulariaceae is a characteristic group of Agaricomycetes (Basidiomycota), which has a number of macrofungi based on a result of the morphological, phylogenetic and cytological studies in China[56,57], but the species diversity of macrofungi are still not well known, especially in subtropical and tropical areas of the country[5861]. The new species, Cyathus wenshanensis is from the subtropics. Therefore, the present paper enriches the fungal diversity in the Chinese ecosystem, and it is likely that more new taxa will be found after further fieldwork and molecular analyses.

      In addition, the results of BLAST queries in NCBI based on ITS separately showed the sequences producing significant alignments descriptions: in ITS blast results, the top ten taxa are C. pyristriatus (Max score 1116; Total score 1116; Query cover 92%; E value 0.0; Ident 95.47%), C. parvocinereus (Maximum record descriptions: Max score 1081; Total score 1081; Query cover 89%; E value 0.0; Ident 95.71%), C. amazonicus (Maximum record descriptions: Max score 1077; Total score 1077; Query cover 87%; E value 0.0; Ident 96.11%), C. uniperidiolus (Maximum record descriptions: Max score 1075; Total score 1075; Query cover 91%; E value 1e-78; Ident 94.84%), C, albinus (Max score 1053; Total score 1053; Query cover 85%; E value 0.0; Ident 96.01%), and C. badius (Maximum record descriptions: Max score 1000; Total score 1000; Query cover 83%; E value 0.0; Ident 95.15%).

      • The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 32170004), Yunnan Fundamental Research Project (Grant No. 202001AS070043) and received support from Yunnan Academy of Biodiversity, Southwest Forestry University.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2022 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (5)  Table (2) References (61)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Duan ZY, Yu J, Zhao CL. 2022. Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal a new wood-rotting fungal species, Cyathus wenshanensis sp. nov. from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Studies in Fungi 7:8 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0008
    Duan ZY, Yu J, Zhao CL. 2022. Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal a new wood-rotting fungal species, Cyathus wenshanensis sp. nov. from the Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau. Studies in Fungi 7:8 doi: 10.48130/SIF-2022-0008

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return