Search
2023 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Genetic transformation and gene delivery strategies in Carica papaya L.

  • # These authors contributed equally: Decai Tuo, Chunhua Ma

More Information
  • Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is a popular tropical fruit of high commercial value due to its nutritional, medicinal and industrial properties. However, conventional breeding methods for papaya have several limitations, including a scarcity of natural genetic resources in the Carica genus and sexual incompatibility among closely-related species. To overcome these challenges, particle bombardment, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and pollen tube-mediated transformation have been developed for generating genetically modified papaya with the desired traits over the past three decades. These transformation methods have been successfully employed to improve papaya's resistance to biotic and abiotic stress, fruit quality, and even to produce edible vaccines. Notably, papaya ringspot virus-resistant transgenic papaya is the first successful commercial application of genetic engineering technology in a fruit crop. Recently, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technology and viral vector-based gene delivery system have emerged as promising tools for papaya genetic improvement and functional genomic studies in papaya. Genome editing will open a new era of precision breeding for papaya. This review aims to highlight past and recent gene transformation methods and their applications in papaya breeding, as well as future perspectives and challenges in improving papaya via genetic engineering.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    da Silva JT, Rashid Z, Nhut DT, Sivakumar D, Gera A, et al. 2007. Papaya (Carica papaya L.) biology and biotechnology. Tree and Forestry Science and Biotechnology 1:47−73

    Google Scholar

    [2]

    Carvalho FA, Renner SS. 2012. A dated phylogeny of the papaya family (Caricaceae) reveals the crop's closest relatives and the family's biogeographic history. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 65:46−53

    doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.05.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Kong YR, Jong YX, Balakrishnan M, Bok ZK, Weng JKK, et al. 2021. Beneficial role of Carica papaya extracts and phytochemicals on oxidative stress and related diseases: a mini review. Biology 10:287

    doi: 10.3390/biology10040287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Koul B, Pudhuvai B, Sharma C, Kumar A, Sharma V, et al. 2022. Carica papaya L.: a tropical fruit with benefits beyond the tropics. Diversity 14:683

    doi: 10.3390/d14080683

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Azarkan M, El Moussaoui A, van Wuytswinkel D, Dehon G, Looze Y. 2003. Fractionation and purification of the enzymes stored in the latex of Carica papaya. Journal of Chromatography B 790:229−38

    doi: 10.1016/S1570-0232(03)00084-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Yu Q, Tong E, Skelton RL, Bowers JE, Jones MR, et al. 2009. A physical map of the papaya genome with integrated genetic map and genome sequence. BMC Genomics 10:371

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-371

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Gonsalves D. 1998. Control of Papaya ringspot virus in papaya: a case study. Annual Review of Phytopathology 36:415−37

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.36.1.415

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Gonsalves D. 2006. Transgenic papaya: development, release, impact and challenges. In Advances in Virus Research, ed. Maramorosch K, Shatkin AJ, Thresh JM. Vol. 67. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press. pp. 317−54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3527(06)67009-7

    [9]

    Tecson Mendoza EM, Laurena AC, Botella JR. 2008. Recent advances in the development of transgenic papaya technology. Biotechnology Annual Review 14:423−62

    doi: 10.1016/S1387-2656(08)00019-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Ming R, Hou S, Feng Y, Yu Q, Dionne-Laporte A, et al. 2008. The draft genome of the transgenic tropical fruit tree papaya (Carica papaya Linnaeus). Nature 452:991−96

    doi: 10.1038/nature06856

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Hoang THT, Nguyen NH, Nguyen LT, Bui TP, Le NT, et al. 2023. Developing a robust in vivo hairy root system for assessing transgene expression and genome editing efficiency in papaya. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 152:661−67

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-022-02421-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Brewer SE, Chambers AH. 2022. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing of phytoene desaturase in Carica papaya L. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 97:580−92

    doi: 10.1080/14620316.2022.2038699

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Lacroix B, Citovsky V. 2020. Biolistic approach for transient gene expression studies in plants. In Biolistic DNA Delivery in Plants. Methods in Molecular Biology, eds. Rustgi S, Luo H. New York: Humana. vol 2124. pp. 125-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-0716-0356-7_6

    [14]

    Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC. 1990. Stable transformation of papaya via microprojectile bombardment. Plant Cell Reports 9:189−94

    doi: 10.1007/BF00232177

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL, Sanford JC. 1992. Virus resistant papaya plants derived from tissues bombarded with the coat protein gene of Papaya ringspot virus. Nature Biotechnology 10:1466−72

    doi: 10.1038/nbt1192-1466

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Gonsalves C, Cai W, Tennant P, Gonsalves D. 1998. Effective development of Papaya ringspot virus resistant papaya with untranslatable coat protein gene using a modified microprojectile transformation method. Acta Horticulturae 461:311−14

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.1998.461.34

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Cabrera-Ponce JL, Vegas-Garcia A, Herrera-Estrella L. 1995. Herbicide resistant transgenic papaya plants produced by an efficient particle bombardment transformation method. Plant Cell Reports 15:1−7

    doi: 10.1007/BF01690242

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhu YJ, Agbayani R, McCafferty H, Albert HH, Moore PH. 2005. Effective selection of transgenic papaya plants with the PMI/Man selection system. Plant Cell Reports 24:426−32

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-005-0956-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Azad MA, Amin L, Sidik NM. 2014. Gene technology for papaya ringspot virus disease management. The Scientific World Journal 2014:768038

    Google Scholar

    [20]

    Chawla R, Ariza-Nieto M, Wilson AJ, Moore SK, Srivastava V. 2006. Transgene expression produced by biolistic-mediated, site-specific gene integration is consistently inherited by the subsequent generations. Plant Biotechnology Journal 4:209−18

    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00173.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Fitch MMM, Manshardt RM, Gonsalves D, Slightom JL. 1993. Transgenic papaya plants from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of somatic embryos. Plant Cell Reports 12:245−49

    doi: 10.1007/BF00237128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Hwang HH, Yu M, Lai EM. 2017. Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation: biology and applications. Arabidopsis Book 15:e0186

    doi: 10.1199/tab.0186

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Pang SZ, Sanford JC. 1988. Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer in papaya. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 113:287−91

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS.113.2.287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Yang JS, Yu TA, Cheng YH, Yeh SD. 1996. Transgenic papaya plants from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of petioles of in vitro propagated multishoots. Plant Cell Reports 15:459−64

    doi: 10.1007/BF00232974

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Cheng YH, Yang JS, Yeh SD. 1996. Efficient transformation of papaya by coat protein gene of papaya ringspot virus mediated by Agrobacterium following liquid-phase wounding of embryogenic tissues with caborundum. Plant Cell Reports 16:127−32

    doi: 10.1007/BF01890852

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Kung YJ, Yu TA, Huang CH, Wang HC, Wang SL, et al. 2010. Generation of hermaphrodite transgenic papaya lines with virus resistance via transformation of somatic embryos derived from adventitious roots of in vitro shoots. Transgenic Research 19:621−35

    doi: 10.1007/s11248-009-9344-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Jiang L, Maoka T, Komori S, Fukamachi H, Kato H, et al. 2004. An efficient method for sonication assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of coat protein (CP) coding genes into papaya (Carica papaya L.). Journal of Molecular Cell Biology 37:189−98

    Google Scholar

    [28]

    Ali A, Bang SW, Chung SM, Staub JE. 2014. Plant transformation via pollen tube-mediated gene transfer. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter 33:742−47

    doi: 10.1007/s11105-014-0839-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Ming R, Yu Q, Moore PH. 2007. Sex determination in papaya. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology 18:401−8

    doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.11.013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Wei J, Liu D, Chen Y, Cai Q, Zhou P. 2008. Transformation of PRSV-CP dsRNA gene into papaya by pollen-tube pathway technique. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica 28:2159−63

    Google Scholar

    [31]

    Tripathi S, Suzuki JY, Ferreira SA, Gonsalves D. 2008. Papaya ringspot virus-P: characteristics, pathogenicity, sequence variability and control. Molecular Plant Pathology 9:269−80

    doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2008.00467.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Ferreira SA, Pitz KY, Manshardt R, Zee F, Fitch M, Gonsalves D. 2002. Virus coat protein transgenic papaya provides practical control of Papaya ringspot virus in Hawaii. Plant Disease 86:101−5

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.2.101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Gonsalves D, Ferreira S. 2003. Transgenic papaya: a case for managing risks of Papaya ringspot virus in Hawaii. Plant Health Progress 4:18

    doi: 10.1094/php-2003-1113-03-rv

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Ye C, Li H. 2010. 20 years of transgenic research in China for resistance to Papaya ringspot virus. Transgenic Plant Journal 4:58−63

    Google Scholar

    [35]

    Kung YJ, You BJ, Raja JAJ, Chen KC, Huang CH, et al. 2015. Nucleotide sequence-homology-independent breakdown of transgenic resistance by more virulent virus strains and a potential solution. Scientific Reports 5:9804

    doi: 10.1038/srep09804

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Chen LFC, Bau hJ, Yeh SD. 2002. Identification of viruses capable of breaking transgenic resistance of papaya conferred by the coat protein gene of Papaya ringspot virus. Acta Horticulturae 575:465−74

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2002.575.54

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Tennant P, Fermin G, Fitch M, Manshardt R, Slightom J, et al. 2001. Papaya ringspot virus resistance of transgenic Rainbow and SunUp is affected by gene dosage, plant development, and coat protein homology. European Journal of Plant Pathology 107:645−53

    doi: 10.1023/A:1017936226557

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Souza MT, Tennant PF, Gonsalves D. 2005. Influence of coat protein transgene copy number on resistance in transgenic line 63-1 against Papaya ringspot virus Isolates. HortScience 40:2083−87

    doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.40.7.2083

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Fermin GA, Castro LT, Tennant PF. 2010. CP-Transgenic and non-transgenic approaches for the control of papaya ringspot current situation and challenges. Transgenic Plant Journal 4:1−15

    Google Scholar

    [40]

    Jia R, Zhao H, Huang J, Kong H, Zhang Y, et al. 2017. Use of RNAi technology to develop a PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya. Scientific Reports 7:12636

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13049-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Gonsalves D. 2014. Hawaii’s transgenic papaya story 1978–2012: a personal account. In Genetics and Genomics of Papaya, ed. Ming R, Moore PH. Vol. 10, New York: Springer. pp. 115−42. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8087-7_7

    [42]

    Hamim I, Borth WB, Marquez J, Green JC, Melzer MJ, et al. 2018. Transgene-mediated resistance to Papaya ringspot virus: challenges and solutions. Phytoparasitica 46:1−18

    doi: 10.1007/s12600-017-0636-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Davis MJ, Ying Z. 2004. Development of papaya breeding lines with transgenic resistance to papaya ringspot virus. Plant Disease 88:352−8

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.4.352

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Lines RE, Persley D, Dale JL, Drew R, Bateson MF. 2002. Genetically engineered immunity to papaya ringspot virus in Australian papaya cultivars. Molecular Breeding 10:119−29

    doi: 10.1023/A:1020381110181

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Tennant P, Ahmad MH, Gonsalves D. 2005. Field resistance of coat protein transgenic papaya to papaya ringspot virus in Jamaica. Plant Disease 89:841−47

    doi: 10.1094/PD-89-0841

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Bau HJ, Cheng YH, Yu TA, Yang JS, Yeh SD. 2003. Broad-spectrum resistance to different geographic strains of papaya ringspot virus in coat protein gene transgenic papaya. Phytopathology 93:112−20

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2003.93.1.112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Fermin G, Inglessis V, Garboza C, Rangel S, Dagert M. 2004. Engineered resistance against PRSV in Venezuelan transgenic papayas. Plant Disease 88:516−22

    doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.5.516

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Retuta AMO, Magdalita PM, Aspuria ET, Espino RRC. 2012. Evaluation of selected transgenic papaya (Carica papaya L.) lines for inheritance of resistance to papaya ringspot virus and horticultural traits. Plant Biotechnology 29:339−49

    doi: 10.5511/plantbiotechnology.12.0215b

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Bau HJ, Kung YJ, Raja JAJ, Chan SJ, Chen KC, et al. 2008. Potential threat of a new pathotype of Papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus infecting transgenic papaya resistant to Papaya ringspot virus. Phytopathology 98:848−56

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-98-7-0848

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Tuo D, Shen W, Yan P, Li C, Gao L, et al. 2013. Complete genome sequence of an isolate of papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus from commercialized PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya in China. Acta Virologica 57:452−55

    doi: 10.4149/av_2013_04_452

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Shen W, Tuo D, Yang Y, Yan P, Li X, et al. 2014. First report of mixed infection of Papaya ringspot virus and Papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus on Carica papaya L. Journal of Plant Pathology 96(4):S121

    Google Scholar

    [52]

    Kung YJ, Bau HJ, Wu YL, Huang CH, Chen TM, et al. 2009. Generation of transgenic papaya with double resistance to Papaya ringspot virus and Papaya leaf-distortion mosaic virus. Phytopathology 99:1312−20

    doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-99-11-1312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Zhu YJ, Agbayani R, Jackson MC, Tang CS, Moore PH. 2004. Expression of the grapevine stilbene synthase gene VST1 in papaya provides increased resistance against diseases caused by Phytophthora palmivora. Planta 220:241−50

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-004-1343-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Zhu YJ, Agbayani R, Moore PH. 2007. Ectopic expression of Dahlia merckii defensin DmAMP1 improves papaya resistance to Phytophthora palmivora by reducing pathogen vigor. Planta 226:87−97

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0471-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Zhu YJ, Agbayani R, Nishijima W, Moore P. 2007. Characterization of disease resistance of Carica papaya to Phytophthora. Acta Horticulturae 740:265−69

    doi: 10.17660/actahortic.2007.740.32

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Parage C, Tavares R, Réty S, Baltenweck-Guyot R, Poutaraud A, et al. 2012. Structural, functional, and evolutionary analysis of the unusually large stilbene synthase gene family in grapevine. Plant Physiology 160:1407−19

    doi: 10.1104/pp.112.202705

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Thevissen K, Francois IEJA, Takemoto JY, Ferket KKA, Meert EMK, et al. 2003. DmAMP1, an antifungal plant defensin from dahlia (Dahlia merckii), interacts with sphingolipids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiology Letters 226:169−73

    doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00590-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Kinkema M, Fan W, Dong X. 2000. Nuclear localization of NPR1 is required for activation of PR gene expression. The Plant Cell 12:2339−50

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.12.12.2339

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Bunawan H, Baharum SN. 2015. Papaya dieback in Malaysia: a step towards a new insight of disease resistance. Iranian Journal of Biotechnology 13:e1139

    doi: 10.15171/ijb.1139

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Sekeli R, Hamid MH, Razak RA, Wee CY, Ong-Abdullah J. 2018. Malaysian Carica papaya L. var. Eksotika: current research strategies fronting challenges. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1380

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01380

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Sekeli R, Nazaruddin NH, Abdullah Ni, Tamizi AA, Amin NM. 2016. Genetic engineering of Eksotika papaya for resistance to papaya dieback. Proceeding 25th Malaysian Society of Plant Physiology Conference, Perak, 2015. Selangor: Malaysian Society of Plant Physiology. pp. 39-41.

    [62]

    McCafferty HRK, Moore PH, Zhu YJ. 2006. Improved Carica papaya tolerance to carmine spider mite by the expression of Manduca sexta chitinase transgene. Transgenic Research 15:337−47

    doi: 10.1007/s11248-006-0005-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Arakane Y, Muthukrishnan S. 2010. Insect chitinase and chitinase-like proteins. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 67:201−16

    doi: 10.1007/s00018-009-0161-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Ding X, Gopalakrishnan B, Johnson LB, White FF, Wang X, et al. 1998. Insect resistance of transgenic tobacco expressing an insect chitinase gene. Transgenic Research 7:77−84

    doi: 10.1023/A:1008820507262

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Osman GH, Assem SK, Alreedy RM, El-Ghareeb DK, Basry MA, et al. 2015. Development of insect resistant maize plants expressing a chitinase gene from the cotton leaf worm, Spodoptera littoralis. Scientific Reports 5:18067

    doi: 10.1038/srep18067

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    McCafferty HRK, Moore PH, Zhu YJ. 2008. Papaya transformed with the Galanthus nivalis GNA gene produces a biologically active lectin with spider mite control activity. Plant Science 175:385−93

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.05.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Green JM, Owen MDK. 2011. Herbicide-resistant crops: utilities and limitations for herbicide-resistant weed management. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59:5819−29

    doi: 10.1021/jf101286h

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    de la Fuente JM, Ramírez-Rodríguez V, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Herrera-Estrella L. 1997. Aluminum tolerance in transgenic plants by alteration of citrate synthesis. Science 276:1566−68

    doi: 10.1126/science.276.5318.1566

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Tahjib-Ul-Arif M, Zahan MI, Karim MM, Imran S, Hunter CT, et al. 2021. Citric acid-mediated abiotic stress tolerance in plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:7235

    doi: 10.3390/ijms22137235

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Soares CG, do Prado SBR, Andrade SCS, Fabi JP. 2021. Systems biology applied to the study of papaya fruit ripening: the influence of ethylene on pulp softening. Cells 10:2339

    doi: 10.3390/cells10092339

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Fabi JP, do Prado SBR. 2019. Fast and furious: ethylene-triggered changes in the metabolism of papaya fruit during ripening. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:535

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00535

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    López-Gómez R, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Saucedo-Arias LJ, Carreto-Montoya L, Villanueva-Arce R, et al. 2009. Ripening in papaya fruit is altered by ACC oxidase cosuppression. Transgenic Research 18:89−97

    doi: 10.1007/s11248-008-9197-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Sekeli R, Abdullah JO, Namasivayam P, Muda P, Abu Bakar UK, et al. 2014. RNA interference of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid oxidase (ACO1 and ACO2) genes expression prolongs the shelf life of Eksotika (Carica papaya L. ) papaya fruit. Molecules 19:8350−62

    doi: 10.3390/molecules19068350

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Cabanos CS, Sajise AG, Garcia RN, Siar SV, Tecson-Mendoza EM. 2013. Compositional analysis of transgenic papaya with delayed ripening. The Philippine Agricultural Scientist 96:331−39

    Google Scholar

    [75]

    Barta A, Sommergruber K, Thompson D, Hartmuth K, Matzke MA, et al. 1986. The expression of a nopaline synthase — human growth hormone chimaeric gene in transformed tobacco and sunflower callus tissue. Plant Molecular Biology 6:347−57

    doi: 10.1007/BF00034942

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Tschofen M, Knopp D, Hood E, Stöger E. 2016. Plant molecular farming: much more than medicines. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry 9:271−94

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-anchem-071015-041706

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Sahoo A, Mandal AK, Dwivedi K, Kumar V. 2020. A cross talk between the immunization and edible vaccine: current challenges and future prospects. Life Sciences 261:118343

    doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.118343

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Monreal-Escalante E, Ramos-Vega A, Angulo C, Bañuelos-Hernández B. 2022. Plant-based vaccines: antigen design, diversity, and strategies for high level production. Vaccines 10:100

    doi: 10.3390/vaccines10010100

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Sohrab SS, Suhail M, Kamal MA, Husen A, Azhar EI. 2017. Recent development and future prospects of plant-based vaccines. Current Drug Metabolism 18:831−41

    doi: 10.2174/1389200218666170711121810

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Takeyama N, Kiyono H, Yuki Y. 2015. Plant-based vaccines for animals and humans: recent advances in technology and clinical trials. Therapeutic Advances in Vaccines 3:139−54

    doi: 10.1177/2051013615613272

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Zhang G, Zhou P, Guo A, Shen W, Li X. 2003. An initial study of transgenic Carica papaya used as a kind of vaccine for anti tuberculosis. Acta Botanica Yunnanica 25:223−29

    doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0845.2003.02.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Hernández M, Cabrera-Ponce JL, Fragoso G, López-Casillas F, Guevara-García A, et a. 2007. A new highly effective anticysticercosis vaccine expressed in transgenic papaya. Vaccine 25:4252−60

    doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.02.080

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Fragoso G, Hernández M, Cervantes-Torres J, Ramírez-Aquino R, Chapula H, et al. 2017. Transgenic papaya: a useful platform for oral vaccines. Planta 245:1037−48

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-017-2658-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Caltempa AO, Herna\u0301ndez M, Pérez A, Aguilar L, Guzmán C, et al. 2022. Improvement of cell suspension cultures of transformed and untransformed Carica papaya cell lines, towards the development of an antiparasitic product against the gastrointestinal nematode Haemonchus contortus. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 12:958741

    doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.958741

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Abrahamian P, Hammond RW, Hammond J. 2020. Plant virus-derived vectors: applications in agricultural and medical biotechnology. Annual Review of Virology 7:513−35

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-virology-010720-054958

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Varanda CM, Felix MDR, Campos MD, Patanita M, Materatski P. 2021. Plant viruses: from targets to tools for CRISPR. Viruses 13:141

    doi: 10.3390/v13010141

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Oh Y, Kim H, Kim SG. 2021. Virus-induced plant genome editing. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 60:101992

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2020.101992

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Tuo D, Shen W, Yan P, Li X, Zhou P. 2015. Rapid construction of stable infectious full-length cDNA clone of Papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus using In-Fusion cloning. Viruses 7:6241−50

    doi: 10.3390/v7122935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Tuo DC, Yan P, Zhao GY, Li XY, Zhou P, et al. 2018. Two agroinfection-compatible fluorescent protein-tagged infectious cDNA clones of papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus facilitate the tracking of virus infection. Acta Virologica 62:202−7

    doi: 10.4149/av_2018_213

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Dommes AB, Gross T, Herbert DB, Kivivirta KI, Becker A. 2019. Virus-induced gene silencing: empowering genetics in non-model organisms. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:757−70

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery411

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Tuo D, Yan P, Zhao G, Cui H, Zhu G, et al. 2021. An efficient papaya leaf distortion mosaic potyvirus vector for virus-induced gene silencing in papaya. Horticulture Research 8:144

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00579-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Osakabe K, Osakabe Y, Toki S. 2010. Site-directed mutagenesis in Arabidopsis using custom-designed zinc finger nucleases. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107:12034−39

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000234107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Miller JC, Tan S, Qiao G, Barlow KA, Wang J, et al. 2011. A TALE nuclease architecture for efficient genome editing. Nature Biotechnology 29:143−48

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.1755

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Chen K, Wang Y, Zhang R, Zhang H, Gao C. 2019. CRISPR/Cas genome editing and precision plant breeding in agriculture. Annual Review of Plant Biology 70:667−97

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-100049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Wada N, Osakabe K, Osakabe Y. 2022. Expanding the plant genome editing toolbox with recently developed CRISPR−Cas systems. Plant Physiology 188:1825−37

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Puchta H, Dujon B, Hohn B. 1996. Two different but related mechanisms are used in plants for the repair of genomic double-strand breaks by homologous recombination. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93:5055−60

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.5055

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Puchta H. 2005. The repair of double-strand breaks in plants: mechanisms and consequences for genome evolution. Journal of Experimental Botany 56:1−14

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri123

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Bleuyard JY, Gallego ME, White CI. 2006. Recent advances in understanding of the DNA double-strand break repair machinery of plants. DNA Repair 5:1−12

    doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.08.017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Lowe K, Wu E, Wang N, Hoerster G, Hastings C, et al. 2016. Morphogenic regulators Baby boom and Wuschel improve monocot transformation. The Plant Cell 28:1998−2015

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00124

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Nelson-Vasilchik K, Hague J, Mookkan M, Zhang ZJ, Kausch A. 2018. Transformation of recalcitrant sorghum varieties facilitated by Baby boom and Wuschel2. Current Protocols in Plant Biology 3:e20076

    doi: 10.1002/cppb.20076

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Kong J, Martin-Ortigosa S, Finer J, Orchard N, Gunadi A, et al. 2020. Overexpression of the transcription factor GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR5 improves transformation of dicot and monocot species. Frontiers of Plant Science 11:572319

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.572319

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Debernardi JM, Tricoli DM, Ercoli MF, Hayta S, Ronald P, et al. 2020. A GRF-GIF chimeric protein improves the regeneration efficiency of transgenic plants. Nature Biotechnology 38:1274−9

    doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0703-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Cody JP, Maher MF, Nasti RA, Starker CG, Chamness JC, Voytas DF. 2023. Direct delivery and fast-treated Agrobacterium co-culture (Fast-TrACC) plant transformation methods for Nicotiana benthamiana. Nature Protocols 18:81−107

    doi: 10.1038/s41596-022-00749-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Maher MF, Nasti RA, Vollbrecht M, Starker CG, Clark MD, Voytas DF. 2020. Plant gene editing through de novo induction of meristems. Nature Biotechnology 38:84−89

    doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0337-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Cao X, Xie H, Song M, Lu J, Ma P, et al. 2023. Cut-dip-budding delivery system enables genetic modifications in plants without tissue culture. The Innovation 4:100345

    doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100345

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Demirer GS, Silva TN, Jackson CT, Thomas JB, Ehrhardt DW, et al. 2021. Nanotechnology to advance CRISPR-Cas genetic engineering of plants. Nature Nanotechnology 16:243−50

    doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00854-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Bao A, Burritt DJ, Chen H, Zhou X, Cao D, et al. 2019. The CRISPR/Cas9 system and its applications in crop genome editing. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 39:321−36

    doi: 10.1080/07388551.2018.1554621

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Manghwar H, Lindsey K, Zhang X, Jin S. 2019. CRISPR/Cas system: recent advances and future prospects for genome editing. Trends in Plant Science 24:1102−25

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.09.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Hua K, Han P, Zhu JK. 2022. Improvement of base editors and prime editors advances precision genome engineering in plants. Plant Physiology 188:1795−810

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiab591

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Gürel F, Zhang Y, Sretenovic S, Qi Y. 2020. CRISPR-Cas nucleases and base editors for plant genome editing. aBIOTECH 1:74−87

    doi: 10.1007/s42994-019-00010-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Sprink T, Wilhelm R, Hartung F. 2022. Genome editing around the globe: an update on policies and perceptions. Plant Physiology 190:1579−87

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac359

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Ahmad A, Munawar N, Khan Z, Qusmani AT, Khan SH, et al. 2021. An outlook on global regulatory landscape for genome-edited crops. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:11753

    doi: 10.3390/ijms222111753

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Gu X, Liu L, Zhang H. 2021. Transgene-free genome editing in plants. Frontiers in Genome Editing 3:805317

    doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.805317

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    He Y, Zhao Y. 2020. Technological breakthroughs in generating transgene-free and genetically stable CRISPR-edited plants. aBIOTECH 1:88−96

    doi: 10.1007/s42994-019-00013-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Gong Z, Cheng M, Botella JR. 2021. Non-GM genome editing approaches in crops. Frontiers in Genome Editing 3:817279

    doi: 10.3389/fgeed.2021.817279

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Tuo D, Ma C, Yan P, Kong H, Zhou P, et al. 2023. Genetic transformation and gene delivery strategies in Carica papaya L.. Tropical Plants 2:5 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0005
    Tuo D, Ma C, Yan P, Kong H, Zhou P, et al. 2023. Genetic transformation and gene delivery strategies in Carica papaya L.. Tropical Plants 2:5 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0005

Figures(1)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(4202) PDF downloads(672)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Genetic transformation and gene delivery strategies in Carica papaya L.

Tropical Plants  2 Article number: 5  (2023)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is a popular tropical fruit of high commercial value due to its nutritional, medicinal and industrial properties. However, conventional breeding methods for papaya have several limitations, including a scarcity of natural genetic resources in the Carica genus and sexual incompatibility among closely-related species. To overcome these challenges, particle bombardment, Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, and pollen tube-mediated transformation have been developed for generating genetically modified papaya with the desired traits over the past three decades. These transformation methods have been successfully employed to improve papaya's resistance to biotic and abiotic stress, fruit quality, and even to produce edible vaccines. Notably, papaya ringspot virus-resistant transgenic papaya is the first successful commercial application of genetic engineering technology in a fruit crop. Recently, CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing technology and viral vector-based gene delivery system have emerged as promising tools for papaya genetic improvement and functional genomic studies in papaya. Genome editing will open a new era of precision breeding for papaya. This review aims to highlight past and recent gene transformation methods and their applications in papaya breeding, as well as future perspectives and challenges in improving papaya via genetic engineering.

    • Papaya (Carica papaya L.) is a tall herbaceous fruit plant from the Caricacae family[1]. It is believed to be native to tropical regions of the Americas and widely cultivated in all tropical regions of the world due to its high nutritional and economic value[2]. Papaya fruits are a rich source of vitamins A and C, folate, thiamine, niacin, riboflavin, iron, potassium, calcium, and fiber. The entire papaya plant, including seeds, leaves, roots, and flowers, has long been used for medicinal purposes owing to its anti-inflammation, anti-skin aging, wound healing, gastrointestinal health improving, and cancer risk-reducing properties[3,4]. In addition, the protease papain, the primary ingredient of which is papaya latex from raw fruits, is widely used in food processing, medicine, and cosmetics[3,5].

      In the past decade, the market demand for papaya has increased steadily due to rapid population growth and the improved public perception of the health benefits of functional fruits. According to the latest statistics from the Food and Agriculture Organization, the world production of papaya fruits has increased from 10.8 million metric tons (Mt) in 2010 to 13.6 Mt in 2020. The global harvested area has grown from 400,200 hectares in 2010 to 468,700 hectares in 2020. India is the world's largest producer of papaya in 2020, with 6.01 Mt of fruit, accounting for 43.2% of the total global production. Other major papaya-producing countries include Dominican Republic, Brazil, Mexico, Indonesia, Nigeria, Democratic Republic of Congo, Colombia and Thailand. Mexico and the United States are the leading papaya-exporting and -importing countries, respectively. However, some biotic stresses (pathogens, pests, and weeds), abiotic stresses (extreme temperatures and drought), and post-harvest losses caused by pathological, physiological, and mechanical conditions have been severely impacting global production of papaya[1]. Traditional papaya breeding methods are limited due to the lack of natural genetic resources and a small gene pool since papaya is the only species of the genus Carica[6]. Transgene technologies provide a powerful alternative to conventional methods for generation of modified plants with the desired traits. Transgenic papaya with resistance to papaya ringspot virus (PRSV, genus Potyvirus, family Potyviridae) was the first genetically modified fruit crop for eventual commercial production in 1998 in Hawaii[7]. Since then, papaya has become the main tropical crop for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and fruit quality improvement via genetic engineering[8,9]. After the completion of the papaya genome sequence in 2008[10], the recently established genome editing based on the CRISPR-Cas systems will open a new era of precision breeding of papaya[11,12]. This review provides an overview of past and recent gene transformation methods and their applications in papaya breeding (Fig. 1, Table 1). Additionally, the paper discusses the future perspectives and challenges of papaya molecular breeding (Fig. 1).

      Figure 1. 

      Important historical milestones and future perspectives in gene transformation strategies and their application of Carica papaya L.

      Table 1.  Summary of transgenic studies in papaya genetic improvement.

      Trait improvementGene introducedTransformation methodReference
      Virus resistance
      PRSV resistanceTranslatable/ Untranslatable coat protein (CP)Biolistics[15,16,3942,44,45]
      Translatable/ Untranslatable CPAgrobacterium[21,24,25,34,39,
      4143, 4648]
      ReplicaseAgrobacterium[34]
      Untranslatable CPPollen tube[30]
      PRSV and PLDMV resistanceUntranslatable CPAgrobacterium[26,52]
      Fungal resistance
      Phytophthora palmivora resistanceStilbene synthase Vst1Biolistics[53]
      Antimicrobial peptide DmAMP1Biolistics[54]
      NPR1Biolistics[55]
      Bacterial resistance
      Dieback disease resistanceAcyl-homoserine lactonaseAgrobacterium[61]
      Insect resistance
      Carmine spider mite resistanceChitinaseBiolistics[62]
      Lectin GNABiolistics[66]
      Abiotic stresses tolerance
      Herbicide resistanceBarBiolistics[17]
      Aluminum toleranceCitrate synthaseBiolistics[68]
      Improvement of shelf life
      Untranslatable ACC oxidase (ACO)Biolistics[72]
      Untranslatable ACO1 and ACO2Agrobacterium[60,73]
      Untranslatable ACC synthase (ACS)Biolistics[9,74]
      Plant-based vaccine
      Antituberculosis vaccineESAT6 of tuberculosisAgrobacterium[81]
      Anticysticercosis vaccineSynthetic peptide genes (KETc1, KETc12, KETc7)Biolistics[82,84]
    • The particle bombardment method, also known as biolistics, is a technique that uses high-velocity microprojectiles made of gold or tungsten to deliver foreign DNA to regenerable plant cells and tissues via a gene gun[13]. In 1990, Fitch et al. reported the first successful stable transformation of papaya using microprojectile bombardment[14]. They used tungsten particles to bombard immature zygotic embryos, hypocotyl sections, and somatic embryos from Hawaiian cultivars 'Sunset' and 'Kapoho' with a plasmid carrying a selectable marker (neomycin phosphotransferase II, nptII) and a reporter gene (β-Glucuronidase, gus). The resulting transgenic embryos and papaya shoots stably expressed the chimeric genes coding for NPTII and GUS. Fitch et al. also obtained PRSV-resistant R0 transgenic plant lines by using particle bombardment-mediated transformation of 2,4-D-treated 'Sunset' immature zygotic embryos with a vector carrying the translatable coat protein gene (CP) from PRSV Hawaiian mild strain HA 5-1[15]. To improve transformation and plant regeneration efficiencies after bombarding papaya somatic embryos, Gonsalves et al. developed three modified major procedures including the culture of suitable somatic embryos at the time of bombardment, efficient proliferation of transformed embryos without antibiotics at the later stages, and selection of plantlets 0.5–1.0 cm long at the transplant stage[16]. On average, each somatic embryo cluster generated 1.3 transgenic lines expressing the untranslatable CP gene of PRSV HA 5-1 in 'Sunrise'. In 1995, Cabrera-Ponce et al. developed herbicide-resistant transgenic papaya plants using zygotic embryos and embryogenic callus of Mexican variety 'Maradol' via particle bombardment[17]. Bombarded embryogenic callus about 50 mg regenerated at least two transgenic clones, and the transformation efficiency was 50-fold higher than that reported by Fitch et al. The age and growth characteristics of the embryogenic callus was considered the most important factor affecting the biolistic transformation frequency. Furthermore, Zhu et al. found that papaya transformation efficiency by particle bombardment was significantly increased using visual green fluorescent protein (GFP) or phosphomannose isomerase (PMI)/mannose as the selection marker and system, instead of antibiotics[18]. Particle bombardment-mediated genetic transformation has been established in papaya cultivars from different countries, including Australia, Jamaica and Brazil, and applied for development of transgenic papaya with new traits such as disease resistance, fruit quality improvement and plant-based vaccine production (Table 1)[9,19]. However, this method has some disadvantages, such as expensive biolistic equipment and consumables, frequent multiple copies of integrated transgenes, transgene rearrangement, and the co-suppression phenomenon[20,21].

    • Compared with particle bombardment, Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation is widely-used method to deliver genes of interest into plants due to its lower transgene copy number, lower cost and higher efficiencies[22]. In 1988, Pang & Sanford were the first to transform leaf disks, stems and petioles of papaya via Agrobacterium, but failed to regenerate transformed plantlets[23]. Fitch et al. reported the successful production of transgenics papaya from Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of somatic embryos from hypocotyl sections[21]. However, the transformation frequency was low (0.15%) and only two transgenic lines were regenerated from 13 g of embryogenic callus. When papaya petioles of in vitro-propagated multishoots were used for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation, the transformation frequency was increased by about 3%[24]. In both cases, the total period of regeneration was long (10–13 months), limiting their application in producing transgenic papaya. To overcome this hurdle, Cheng et al. reported that wounding cultured embryogenic tissues with carborundum prior to Agrobacterium-mediated transformation achieved up to 15.9% transformation frequency and the transformation period is shortened to about 9 months[25]. Commercial markets prefer the pear-shaped fruit obtained from hermaphroditic plants. Accordingly, somatic embryos derived from adventitious roots of hermaphroditic plants were used as explants to generate hermaphrodite transgenic papaya lines with double resistance to PRSV and papaya leaf distortion mosaic virus (PLDMV genus Potyvirus, family Potyviridae) via Agrobacterium-mediated transformation[26]. This protocol contributes to develop new papaya varieties with desired hermaphroditic characteristic in a shorter period of time. In a further modification, Jiang et al. established a sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in papaya[27]; the transformation frequency was enhanced about 10 times using 15 s sonication of embryo callus.

    • Pollen tube-mediated genetic transformation is a non-tissue culture method that provides an alternative to overcome genotype specificity limitations[28]. Papaya is an ideal model for transformation via the pollen tube pathway because of its trioecious characteristic with male, female, and hermaphrodite flowers, short generation time (9–15 months), and continuous flowering and fruit production throughout the year with numerous seeds[29]. Wei et al. pipetted various binary plasmids or Agrobacterium suspensions carrying PRSV CP fragments in sense, antisense, and double-sense orientations onto stigmas of female flowers before pollination[30]. PCR analysis revealed that approximately 9% of the papaya seeds from treated flowers were transformed. The resulting transgenic plants expressed PRSV CP gene and exhibited the resistance to PRSV. This method provided a promising genetic transformation for directly generating transgenic papaya without the need for tissue culture.

    • PRSV is a devastating pathogen that causes significant yield losses in papaya plantations worldwide[31]. There are two types of PRSV, P and W; P infects papaya and cucurbits, while W infects cucurbits but not papaya[31]. Because of a lack of sources of natural genetic resistance to PRSV, the main control strategies are quarantine, physical control, cross-protection, and transgene-based resistance[7]. Currently, transgenic resistance conferred by homology-dependent post-transcriptional gene silencing (PTGS) of the viral gene is the most effective method to protect plants against PRSV infection. As early as 1991, an R0 transgenic line 55-1 resistant to PRSV HA was first obtained in the USA by particle bombardment transformation of the red-fleshed cultivar 'Sunset' with the CP gene of PRSV, based on the concept of pathogen-derived resistance[15]. Subsequently, homozygous 'SunUp' was produced by crossing line 55-1 carrying a single copy of PRSV CP and a non-transgenic 'Sunset', followed by selfing of the transgenic R1 progeny. Given that the yellow-flesh dominant cultivar 'Kapoho' was popular in Hawaii, line 55-1 was further used to cross with nontransgenic 'Kapoho' and the resulting F1 hybrid was named as 'Rainbow'[32]. In 1998, 'SunUp' and 'Rainbow' were released for commercial cultivation in Hawaii, and they helped revive the Hawaiian papaya industry[33]. This case represents the first commercialized transgenic fruit crop. In 2006, transgenic papaya 'Huanong No. 1' from the South China Agricultural University was approved for release in Guangdong province (China). This genetically modified papaya was generated using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of the cultivar 'Yuanyou No.1' with the replicase (nuclear inclusion protein b) gene (NIb) of PRSV Ys, a prevalent strain in China[34]. In 2018, The Chinese Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs issued biosafety certificates for commercial production of the transgenic papaya line YK1601 expressing the CP gene of the severe PRSV strain YK in South China. However, transgenic papaya is susceptible to reduction or loss of viral gene-mediated resistance to PRSV due to various factors such as transgene copy number, plant developmental stage, the sequence homology with the transgene, and the geographic diversity of PRSV[3538]. Therefore, geographic-specific varieties of PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya have been developed using transgenes that expressed translatable or untranslatable sequences (sense, antisense RNA or hairpin RNA) of CP or NIb from different PRSV strains of various countries (Table 1)[9,19,34,3948]. In addition, another potyvirus, PLDMV, was detected in a PRSV-resistant transgenic papaya in China, causing disease symptoms similar to those of PRSV[49,50]. Moreover, co-infection with PRSV and PLDMV was identified in papaya[51], making PLDMV an emerging threat to papaya production in China. Kung et al. transformed an untranslatable chimeric sequence including the truncated CP coding region of the PLDMV P-TW-WF isolate and the truncated CP coding region with the complete 3′ untranslated region of PRSV YK isolate into papaya, resulting in transgenic plants with double resistance to PLDMV and PRSV[52]. Moreover, to decrease the cycle time and costs in hybrid breeding, hermaphrodite transgenic papaya lines with resistance to both PRSV and PLDMV were generated via transforming somatic embryos derived from adventitious roots of in vitro shoots[26].

    • Phytophthora palmivora is an oomycete plant pathogen that causes rots in the roots, stems and fruits of papaya, and is highly destructive. Zhu et al. transformed a stilbene synthase (Vst1) from grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.), antimicrobial peptide 1 (DmAMP1) from seeds of dahlia (Dahlia merckii), or NONEXPRESSOR OF PATHOGENESIS-RELATED GENES 1 (NPR1) from Arabidopsis thaliana or papaya into papaya plants to confer resistance to P. palmivora[5355]. Stilbene synthases (ST) are the key enzymes in the biosynthesis of the stilbene backbone, and transgenic plants overexpressing ST genes could improve resistance to pathogens that are sensitive to stilbenes[56] . Indeed, expression of the Vst1 gene in papaya increased resistance to P. palmivora[53]. DmAMP1 is an antifungal plant defensin that induces an array of relatively rapid responses in fungal membranes[57]. Overexpression of DmAMP1 in transgenic papaya lines increased their resistance to P. palmivora by reducing hyphal growth at the infection sites[54]. NPR1 is a well-known key regulator of systemic acquired resistance that can trigger plant defense after local infection by pathogens[58]. Transgenic papaya expressing NPR1 from Arabidopsis thaliana or papaya showed improved resistance to P. palmivora[55]. In Malaysia, dieback disease caused by Erwinia mallotivora is a major threat to papaya plantations[59]. Sekeli et al. transformed two acyl-homoserine lactonase genes with anti-pathogenic function from Bacillus cereus CHB37 and Bacillus thuringiensis SP24 into papaya. The resulting transgenic papaya lines exhibited resistance against the dieback disease[60, 61].

      Carmine spider mite (Teiranychus cinnabarinus Boisduval) is one of the most destructive pests affecting papaya[62]. Chitinases play an important role in degrading chitin in the exoskeleton and gut linings of insects[63]. Several studies have demonstrated that transgenic plants overexpressing insect chitinases are protected from pathogenic fungi and insect pests, as chitinases in high concentrations or with appropriately timed exposure are toxic to plant pathogens such as insects and fungi[64,65]. McCafferty et al. developed insect-resistant transgenic papaya plants expressing a tobacco hornworm (Manduca sexta) chitinase (MSCH)[62]. Insect bioassays revealed that expression of the insect MSCH gene improved papaya tolerance to carmine spider mite. Furthermore, transgenic papaya plants overexpressing a snowdrop (Galanthus nivalis) lectin gene GNA were identified to contain biologically active lectin with spider mite control activity[66].

    • The bialaphos resistance (Bar) gene, which confers resistance to the broad-spectrum herbicide glufosinate via N-acetylation, has been widely used in genetically-engineered herbicide-resistant plants in many crop species[67]. Cabrera-Ponce et al. successfully introduced the Bar gene by particle bombardment into papaya zygotic embryos and embryogenic callus to produce herbicide-resistant transgenic plants[17]. The study provides not only a new selection marker for papaya genetic transformation but also offers the possibility of applying transgenic technology to control weeds in papaya fields. Another example of transgenic papaya for tolerance to abiotic stresses is the tolerance to aluminum (Al) stress. de la Fuente et al. reported that overexpression of a citrate synthase gene from Pseudomonas aeruginosa in papaya led to a 10-fold increase in citrate production and improved tolerance to Al-stress up to 300 mM[68,69].

    • Papaya is a typical climacteric fleshy fruit that undergoes fast pulp softening due to ethylene which results in postharvest losses and shortened shelf life[70]. Ethylene is synthesized from methionine through S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) and 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid (ACC). ACC synthase (ACS) and ACC oxidase (ACO) are the key ethylene biosynthetic enzymes[71]. A transgenic gene-silencing approach to prevent fruit ripening is to down-regulate the expression of key ethylene biosynthetic enzymes for suppression of ethylene production or perception. To engineer papaya fruit with delayed ripening, transgenic papaya was first developed by introducing a fragment of the ACO gene in the sense orientation to inhibit ethylene production and delay ripening[72]. Similarly, Malaysian researchers applied hairpin RNA (hpRNA) constructs to down-regulate the expression of the endogenous ACO1 and ACO2 genes in Eksotika papaya[60,73]. Fruits harvested from transgenic papaya plants showed an extended post-harvest shelf life of 14−20 d compared with the non-transgenic Eksotika papaya. In the Philippines, transgenic papaya delayed fruit ripening was generated by introduction of antisense ACS gene. The safety assessment revealed that downregulation of the expression of ACS gene did not produce any major undesired changes in the proximate composition and other chemical constituents in transgenic papaya[9,74].

    • Since the first production of human growth hormone in transgenic tobacco in 1986, plants have been used as bioreactors to produce a wide range of recombinant human or animal proteins, such as enzymes, antibodies, vaccines, and medicinal proteins by molecular farming[75,76]. Edible vaccines have been shown to induce both mucosal and systemic immunity against disease-causing organism[77]. Given the attractive advantages of plant-based expression systems, such as cost-effectiveness, low cost, and easy cultivation, many edible plant species, including papaya, have been developed to generate plant-based vaccines against various human and animal diseases[7880]. In a study aimed at developing a plant-based vaccine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in papaya, transgenic papaya lines expressing the 6 kDa early secreted antigen target (ESAT6) were generated[81]. The work presents a new method for the development of edible vaccines against tuberculosis. Additionally, papaya callus cells were engineered to express three protective peptides (S3Pvac: KETc1, KETc12, and KETc7) for producing an oral vaccine against cysticercosis caused by the tape worms Taenia solium or T. crassiceps via particle bombardment[82]. Oral vaccination of mice and pigs with the S3Pvac-papaya soluble extract elicited effective immunity against cysticercosis, demonstrating that papaya callus is a useful platform for plant-based oral vaccines[83]. Recently, cell suspension cultures of KETc7-expressing calluses have been developed for biomass production of antiparasitic product against the gastrointestinal nematode Haemonchus contortus in airlift bioreactor[84].

    • Plant virus-based vectors are rapid and effective genetic tools without the need for time-consuming transformations and have been used for heterologous gene expression, endogenous gene silencing, and genome editing in plant functional genomic studies and biotechnology[8587]. We successfully constructed two agroinfection-compatible fluorescence-tagged PLDMV infectious cDNA clones, driven by the Cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter, using a one-step Gibson assembly to express systematically GFP or mCherry protein in papaya plants[88,89]. The availability of these infectious clones will facilitate tracking of the dynamics of virus infection in plants and contribute to studies on PLDMV-host interactions. In the future, PLDMV-mediated overexpression vector will be used to produce high levels of recombinant proteins and peptides for applications in biopharmaceuticals and agrobiotechnology. Although the genome of papaya has been sequenced[10], the genetic approaches available at present for functional genomic studies depend on laborious genetic transformation. Virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) is a powerful forward and reverse genetic technique for functional genomic studies in plants. More than 50 VIGS vectors from plant viruses and their viral satellites have been developed so far[90]. Recently, we developed a VIGS vector in papaya using a PLDMV mild strain, namely PLDMV-E[91]. The PLDMV-based VIGS vector successfully silenced five papaya endogenous genes, which encode phytoene desaturase (PDS), Mg-chelatase H subunit, putative GA receptors GIBBERELLIN (GA)-INSENSITIVE DWARF1A and 1B, and the cytochrome CYP83B1, respectively. The method provides a rapid and convenient tool as an alternative to transgenic techniques for functional genomic studies in papaya.

    • Over the past decade, genome editing techniques based on sequence-specific engineered endonucleases (SSNs), such as zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs), transcription activator-like effector nucleases (TALENs) and Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/associated (Cas) proteins, have been used as powerful tools for targeted genome modifications in plants[80,9295]. SSNs generate double-stranded DNA breaks that are repaired in eukaryotic cells by two main types of DNA repair machinery, non-homologous end joining and homology-directed repair[93,9698]. Among these tools, the CRISPR/Cas9 system is the most-widely applied genome-editing tool for genetic studies, germplasm innovation and crop breeding because of its ease, convenience, cost-effectiveness and high efficiency in creating targeted modifications. Given the availability of papaya genetic transformation technologies and whole-genome sequences, it is now feasible to develop CRISPR-based genome editing for papaya breeding. Recently, Brewer & Chambers established an effective CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing system in papaya by expressing three guide RNAs (gRNAs) targeting the papaya PDS gene using Agrobacterium-mediated transformation[12]. Edited transgenic plantlets exhibited complete albino phenotypes, and diverse gene editing, including insertion, inversion, and deletion, was detected at all three desired gRNA target loci with an 81% efficiency of insertion or deletion (indel) mutations. Additionally, Hoang et al. developed an in vivo hairy root system for assessing genome editing efficiency in papaya via Rhizobium rhizogenes[11]. These studies have opened a new avenue for functional analysis of papaya genes, trait improvement, and breeding using the CRISPR/Cas9 system.

    • For the past 20 years, transgenic technology has proven successful in improving various agronomic traits in papaya, such as fruit quality, and biotic and abiotic stress tolerance (Fig. 1, Table 1). Notably, genetically engineered papaya expressing the PRSV CP is the first fruit crop to be successfully deregulated and commercialized. However, the development of genetic engineering in papaya lags behind that in many staple food crops and fruits over recent years. The main reasons are that papaya transformation is still dependent on traditional Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation or particle bombardment, both with some disadvantages such as low transformation efficiencies and laborious procedures. To improve papaya transformation systems, previous studies focused on optimizing the crucial transformation factors and plant regeneration conditions, such as explant types, tissue culture media and selection markers. In addition, current transformation protocols are only applicable to a limited number of papaya cultivars. In the future, more efforts are needed to develop simpler and more effective technologies and strategies for the improvement of papaya transformation and regeneration. Several studies have provided evidence that co-delivering transgenes with genes encoding some developmental regulators, such as WUSCHEL (WUS), Baby Boom (Bbm) and GROWTH-REGULATING FACTOR (GRF), can promote somatic embryogenesis and transformation efficiency in monocot genetic transformation[99102]. For dicot species, Dr. Voytas' lab recently developed two transformation methods, named direct delivery (DD) and fast-treated Agrobacterium co-culture (Fast-TrACC), by co-delivering developmental regulators (WUS2, IPT and STM) and gene editing reagents into somatic cells to induce de novo genetically modified meristems in seedlings grown in nonsterile conditions and soil[103,104]. Transgenic shoots with targeted DNA mutations were recovered from the edited meristems of tomato, potato and grape. This innovative work avoids tissue culture-based transformation and provides simple and rapid alternatives to genetic transformation methods. More recently, Cao et al. established a simple Agrobacterium rhizogenes-mediated cut-dip-budding (CDB) delivery system to create transformed roots that produce transformed buds by root suckering[105]. This system has been used successfully to generate heritable transformation in two herbaceous plants (Taraxacum kok-saghyz and Coronilla varia), a tuberous root plant (sweet potato), and three woody plant species (Ailanthus altissima, Aralia elata, and Clerodendrum chinense). In addition, nanotechnology-based gene-delivery methods have been developed for plant genetic transformation and show many advantages over conventional methods[106]. In any case, these breakthrough technologies can be expected to contribute to developing new gene transformation strategies for crops including papaya, with applications in both biological research and genetic improvement.

      The rapid advancement of CRISPR/Cas-based genome editing methods has revolutionized crop improvement and provided a powerful tool for enhancing various traits in papaya, such as resistance to pathogens and pests, abiotic stress tolerance, and fruit quality[95,107,108]. Although the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing system has been established in papaya, its application is still in the early stages compared to model plants and staple food crops. With the continuous innovation in CRISPR/Cas9 -based genome editing technology, novel techniques, more precise and efficient techniques, such as alternative types of Cas effectors-based gene editing, base editing, and prim editing, are emerging[94,109,110]. The novel techniques will further facilitate the development of precision breeding of papaya in the future (Fig. 1). In addition, the use of CRISPR/Cas-mediated gene editing raises important legislative issues related to genetically modified organisms (GMO), such as off-target mutations and transgene integration from T-DNA-mediated CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing. Transgene-free genome editing could address these concerns and enable regulatory approval for commercial production because the resulting mutation events without foreign DNA insertion could occur naturally or by conventional breeding. Some countries, such as the USA, Japan, and Australia, exclude some or all types of genome-edited crops from GMO regulations if they do not contain genetically engineered transgenes or foreign DNA[111,112]. Currently, the main strategies for eliminating CRISPR constructs and other transgenes fall into three categories[113115]: (1) efficient elimination of transgenes from stable integration by genetic segregation, (2) transient expression of CRISPR/Cas DNA vectors and (3) direct delivery of CRISPR/Cas RNA or ribonucleoproteins. We anticipate that these new strategies of transgene-free genome editing will contribute to future development of edited papayas for commercial exploitation.

      • This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072390), the Hainan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (320RC717), the Central Public Interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund for Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences (grant no. 19CXTD-33) and the Innovation Platform for Academicians of Hainan Province.

      • Wentao Shen is the Editorial Board member of Journal Tropical Plants. He was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and his research groups.

      • Received 11 January 2023; Accepted 17 April 2023; Published online 26 April 2023

      • # These authors contributed equally: Decai Tuo, Chunhua Ma

      • Copyright: © 2023 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  Table (1) References (115)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Tuo D, Ma C, Yan P, Kong H, Zhou P, et al. 2023. Genetic transformation and gene delivery strategies in Carica papaya L.. Tropical Plants 2:5 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0005
    Tuo D, Ma C, Yan P, Kong H, Zhou P, et al. 2023. Genetic transformation and gene delivery strategies in Carica papaya L.. Tropical Plants 2:5 doi: 10.48130/TP-2023-0005

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return