Search
2026 Volume 19
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Maternal epigenetic signatures are associated with small for gestational age births among black women

  • # Authors contributed equally: Paolo Reho, Tingting Zhao

More Information
  • Approximately 10% US infants are born small for gestational age (SGA), a condition linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Infants born to Black women are twice as likely to be SGA compared with those born to White women. Although maternal factors, including epigenetic modifications, likely contribute to SGA, the underlying biological mechanisms remain poorly understood. We evaluated whether epigenetic modifications in early pregnancy were associated with SGA among pregnant Black women. We analyzed data from 931 pregnant non-Hispanic Black women (6–13 weeks of gestation) enrolled in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) cohort across eight academic medical centers. We conducted an epigenome-wide association study using the Infinium MethylationEPIC assay on blood samples from women who delivered SGA infants (n = 133) and appropriate for gestational age infants (n = 798). We adjusted for maternal age, prenatal smoking, education, body mass index, and infant sex, and corrected with multiple testing. We identified 14 differentially methylated 5'-C-phosphate-G-3' (CpG) sites mapping to genes involved in placental development, vascular remodeling, and fetal growth regulation. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted the pathways involved in early embryonic development and placental function, implicating early-pregnancy maternal epigenetic alterations in SGA delivery among Black women and supporting DNA methylation profiling as a potential SGA biomarker.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 Differentially methylated CpGs associated with SGA (Illumina annotation).
    Supplementary Table S2 CpG associated with SGA (FDR < 0.1) annotation using the annotatr package.
    Supplementary Table S3 Biological pathways enriched by the DMPs-associated genes.
  • [1] ACOG. 2021. Fetal growth restriction: ACOG practice bulletin, Number 227. Obstetrics and Gynecology 137:e16−e28 doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004251

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. 2023. Births: Final Data for 2021. National Vital Statistics Reports. USA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System. pp. 1–53 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36723449
    [3] Wallace ME, Mendola P, Liu D, Grantz KL. 2015. Joint effects of structural racism and income inequality on small-for-gestational-age birth. American Journal of Public Health 105:1681−1688 doi: 10.2105/ajph.2015.302613

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Díez López I, Cernada M, Galán L, Boix H, Ibañez L, et al. 2024. Small for gestational age: concept, diagnosis and neonatal characterization, follow-up and recommendations. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition) 101:124−131 doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2024.07.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Minor KC, Bianco K, Sie L, Druzin ML, Lee HC, et al. 2023. Severity of small-for-gestational-age and morbidity and mortality among very preterm neonates. Journal of Perinatology 43:437−444 doi: 10.1038/s41372-022-01544-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] O'Brien M, Gilchrist C, Sadler L, Hegarty JE, Alsweiler JM. 2023. Infants eligible for neonatal hypoglycemia screening: a systematic review. JAMA Pediatrics 177:1187−1196 doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2023.3957

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7] Surkan PJ, Hong X, Zhang B, Nawa N, Ji H, et al. 2020. Can social support during pregnancy affect maternal DNA methylation? Findings from a cohort of African-Americans. Pediatric Research 88:131−138 doi: 10.1038/s41390-019-0512-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Quinn EB, Hsiao CJ, Maisha FM, Mulligan CJ. 2023. Prenatal maternal stress is associated with site-specific and age acceleration changes in maternal and newborn DNA methylation. Epigenetics 18:2222473 doi: 10.1080/15592294.2023.2222473

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Leeuwerke M, Eilander MS, Pruis MGM, Lendvai Á, Erwich JJHM, et al. 2016. DNA methylation and expression patterns of selected genes in first-trimester placental tissue from pregnancies with small-for-gestational-age infants at birth. Biology of Reproduction 94:e37 doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.131698

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Kim SY, Kim HJ, Park SY, Lee DE, Kim KS, et al. 2015. Quantification of the placental epigenetic signature of the SERPINB5 gene in maternal plasma of pregnancies complicated by small for gestational age. Placenta 36:131−137 doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2014.09.020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Aghagoli G, Sheinkopf SJ, Everson TM, Marsit CJ, Lee H, et al. 2021. Epigenome-wide analysis identifies genes and pathways linked to acoustic cry variation in preterm infants. Pediatric Research 89:1848−1854 doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-01172-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Haas DM, Parker CB, Wing DA, Parry S, Grobman WA, et al. 2015. A description of the methods of the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: monitoring mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b). American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 212:539.e1−539.e24 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.01.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Oken E, Kleinman KP, Rich-Edwards J, Gillman MW. 2003. A nearly continuous measure of birth weight for gestational age using a United States national reference. BMC Pediatrics 3:6 doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-3-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Yang HH, Han MR. 2024. MethylCallR: a comprehensive analysis framework for Illumina Methylation Beadchip. Scientific Reports 14:27026 doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77914-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Aryee MJ, Jaffe AE, Corrada-Bravo H, Ladd-Acosta C, Feinberg AP, et al. 2014. Minfi: a flexible and comprehensive Bioconductor package for the analysis of Infinium DNA methylation microarrays. Bioinformatics 30:1363−1369 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu049

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Chen Y, Lemire M, Choufani S, Butcher DT, Grafodatskaya D, et al. 2013. Discovery of cross-reactive probes and polymorphic CpGs in the Illumina Infinium HumanMethylation450 microarray. Epigenetics 8:203−209 doi: 10.4161/epi.23470

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Cavalcante RG, Sartor MA. 2017. Annotatr: genomic regions in context. Bioinformatics 33:2381−2383 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, et al. 2015. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Research 43:e47 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Kolberg L, Raudvere U, Kuzmin I, Adler P, Vilo J, et al. 2023. G: profiler—interoperable web service for functional enrichment analysis and gene identifier mapping (2023 update). Nucleic Acids Research 51:W207−W212 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad347

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, et al. 2000. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 25:25−29 doi: 10.1038/75556

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Kanehisa M, Goto S. 2000. KEGG Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Research 28:27−30 doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Milacic M, Beavers D, Conley P, Gong C, Gillespie M, et al. 2024. The reactome pathway knowledgebase 2024. Nucleic Acids Research 52:D672−D678 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad1025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Lawless L, Qin Y, Xie L, Zhang K. 2023. Trophoblast differentiation: mechanisms and implications for pregnancy complications. Nutrients 15:3564 doi: 10.3390/nu15163564

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Masserdotti A, Gasik M, Grillari-Voglauer R, Grillari J, Cargnoni A, et al. 2024. Unveiling the human fetal-maternal interface during the first trimester: biophysical knowledge and gaps. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology 12:1411582 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1411582

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Sun C, Groom KM, Oyston C, Chamley LW, Clark AR, et al. 2020. The placenta in fetal growth restriction: what is going wrong? Placenta 96:10−18 doi: 10.1016/j.placenta.2020.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Apicella C, Ruano CSM, Méhats C, Miralles F, Vaiman D. 2019. The role of epigenetics in placental development and the etiology of preeclampsia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:2837 doi: 10.3390/ijms20112837

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Rosenfeld CS. 2024. Placenta extracellular vesicles: messengers connecting maternal and fetal systems. Biomolecules 14:995 doi: 10.3390/biom14080995

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Wang W, Wang S, Xu AM, Yuan X, Huang L, et al. 2021. Overexpression of GSE1 related to trastuzumab resistance in gastric cancer cells. BioMed Research International 2021:8834923 doi: 10.1155/2021/8834923

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Hiver S, Shimizu-Mizuno N, Ikawa Y, Kajikawa E, Sai X, et al. 2023. Gse1, a component of the CoREST complex, is required for placenta development in the mouse. Developmental Biology 498:97−105 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2023.03.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Lamber EP, Guicheney P, Pinotsis N. 2022. The role of the M-band myomesin proteins in muscle integrity and cardiac disease. Journal of Biomedical Science 29:18 doi: 10.1186/s12929-022-00801-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Auxerre-Plantié E, Nielsen T, Grunert M, Olejniczak O, Perrot A, et al. 2020. Identification of MYOM2 as a candidate gene in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and Tetralogy of Fallot, and its functional evaluation in the Drosophila heart. Disease Models & Mechanisms 13:dmm045377 doi: 10.1242/dmm.045377

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Winerdal M, Westenius E, Granfors M, Pettersson M, Iwarsson E. 2020. Confined placental mosaicism of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a case report. Molecular Cytogenetics 13:51 doi: 10.1186/s13039-020-00520-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Dai C, Tong Y, Bai N, Xu N, Zhao X, et al. 2025. Decoding the role of nucleic acid binding protein 2 in lipid dysregulation and hepatocellular carcinoma progression through LKB1-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction. Cellular Signalling 132:111820 doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2025.111820

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Dang Q, Zhu Y, Zhang Y, Hu Z, Wei Y, et al. 2024. Nuclear binding protein 2/nesfatin-1 affects trophoblast cell fusion during placental development via the EGFR-PLCG1-CAMK4 pathway. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25:1925 doi: 10.3390/ijms25031925

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Court MH, Hazarika S, Krishnaswamy S, Finel M, Williams JA. 2008. Novel polymorphic human UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 2A3: cloning, functional characterization of enzyme variants, comparative tissue expression, and gene induction. Molecular Pharmacology 74:744−754 doi: 10.1124/mol.108.045500

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Collier AC, Yamauchi Y, Sato BLM, Rougée LRA, Ward MA. 2014. UDP-glucuronosyltransferase 1a enzymes are present and active in the mouse blastocyst. Drug Metabolism and Disposition 42:1921−1925 doi: 10.1124/dmd.114.059766

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Yao C, Yang C, Zhao L, Li P, Tian R, et al. 2021. Bi-allelic SHOC1 loss-of-function mutations cause meiotic arrest and non-obstructive azoospermia. Journal of Medical Genetics 58:679−686 doi: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2020-107042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Zadeh N, Graham JM. 1993. KCNK9 Imprinting Syndrome. In GeneReviews®, ed. Adam MP, Bick S, Mirzaa GM, Pagon RA, Wallace SE, et al. Seattle, WA: University of Washington. pp. 1−16 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK425128/pdf/Bookshelf_NBK425128.pdf
    [39] Janssen BG, Godderis L, Pieters N, Poels K, Kiciński M, et al. 2013. Placental DNA hypomethylation in association with particulate air pollution in early life. Particle and Fibre Toxicology 10:22 doi: 10.1186/1743-8977-10-22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Bekkering I, Leeuwerke M, Tanis JC, Schoots MH, Verkaik-Schakel RN, et al. 2019. Differential placental DNA methylation of VEGFA and LEP in small-for-gestational age fetuses with an abnormal cerebroplacental ratio. PLoS One 14:e0221972 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0221972

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Filiberto AC, Maccani MA, Koestler DC, Wilhelm-Benartzi C, Avissar-Whiting M, et al. 2011. Birthweight is associated with DNA promoter methylation of the glucocorticoid receptor in human placenta. Epigenetics 6:566−572 doi: 10.4161/epi.6.5.15236

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42] Tobi EW, Heijmans BT, Kremer D, Putter H, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, et al. 2011. DNA methylation of IGF2, GNASAS, INSIGF and LEP and being born small for gestational age. Epigenetics 6:171−176 doi: 10.4161/epi.6.2.13516

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Collier AY, Ledyard R, Montoya-Williams D, Qiu M, Dereix AE, et al. 2021. Racial and ethnic representation in epigenomic studies of preterm birth: a systematic review. Epigenomics 13:1735−1746 doi: 10.2217/epi-2020-0007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] Reforma L, Greenberg S, Ledyard R, Burris H. 2024. Equitable representation of race, ethnicity, and ancestry among genomic studies of preterm birth: a systematic review. Cureus 16:e53757 doi: 10.7759/cureus.53757

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45] Loyfer N, Magenheim J, Peretz A, Cann G, Bredno J, et al. 2023. A DNA methylation atlas of normal human cell types. Nature 613:355−364 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05580-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Stone A, Zotenko E, Locke WJ, Korbie D, Millar EKA, et al. 2015. DNA methylation of oestrogen-regulated enhancers defines endocrine sensitivity in breast cancer. Nature Communications 6:7758 doi: 10.1038/ncomms8758

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Li L, Lee KM, Han W, Choi JY, Lee JY, et al. 2010. Estrogen and progesterone receptor status affect genome-wide DNA methylation profile in breast cancer. Human Molecular Genetics 19:4273−4277 doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddq351

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Houtepen LC, Vinkers CH, Carrillo-Roa T, Hiemstra M, van Lier PA, et al. 2016. Genome-wide DNA methylation levels and altered Cortisol stress reactivity following childhood trauma in humans. Nature Communications 7:10967 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10967

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Reho P, Zhao T, Zhao Y, Samari G, Wapner R, et al. 2026. Maternal epigenetic signatures are associated with small for gestational age births among black women. Epigenetics Insights 19: e009 doi: 10.48130/epi-0026-0006
    Reho P, Zhao T, Zhao Y, Samari G, Wapner R, et al. 2026. Maternal epigenetic signatures are associated with small for gestational age births among black women. Epigenetics Insights 19: e009 doi: 10.48130/epi-0026-0006

Figures(2)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(110) PDF downloads(18)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Maternal epigenetic signatures are associated with small for gestational age births among black women

Epigenetics Insights  19 Article number: e009  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Approximately 10% US infants are born small for gestational age (SGA), a condition linked to increased morbidity and mortality. Infants born to Black women are twice as likely to be SGA compared with those born to White women. Although maternal factors, including epigenetic modifications, likely contribute to SGA, the underlying biological mechanisms remain poorly understood. We evaluated whether epigenetic modifications in early pregnancy were associated with SGA among pregnant Black women. We analyzed data from 931 pregnant non-Hispanic Black women (6–13 weeks of gestation) enrolled in the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) cohort across eight academic medical centers. We conducted an epigenome-wide association study using the Infinium MethylationEPIC assay on blood samples from women who delivered SGA infants (n = 133) and appropriate for gestational age infants (n = 798). We adjusted for maternal age, prenatal smoking, education, body mass index, and infant sex, and corrected with multiple testing. We identified 14 differentially methylated 5'-C-phosphate-G-3' (CpG) sites mapping to genes involved in placental development, vascular remodeling, and fetal growth regulation. Functional enrichment analysis highlighted the pathways involved in early embryonic development and placental function, implicating early-pregnancy maternal epigenetic alterations in SGA delivery among Black women and supporting DNA methylation profiling as a potential SGA biomarker.

    • Small-for-gestational-age (SGA) refers to infants whose birth weight falls below the 10th percentile for their gestational age, representing approximately 8%–10% of all live births in the United States[1,2]. Infants born to Black women are more than twice as likely to be born SGA compared with infants born to White women[3]. SGA is associated with increased risks of morbidity and mortality beginning in the neonatal period and extending into adulthood[46]. Understanding the biological mechanisms underlying SGA is therefore critical to identifying its etiologic risk factors and informing prevention and intervention strategies.

      Although maternal genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors likely play a role in the risk of SGA, the underlying biological mechanisms, particularly the role of maternal DNA methylation (DNAm) alterations, remain poorly understood. Emerging evidence suggests that the interaction between maternal DNAm and environmental exposures, especially significant maternal stress and adverse social determinants of health, can lead to epigenetic modifications[7,8]. Altered DNAm patterns in the genes involved in placental function, immune regulation, and growth signaling pathways (e.g., IGF2, H19, LEP) may disrupt fetal development and increase the risk of SGA at delivery[9]. Postnatally, both unmethylated and methylated placental SERPINB5 levels have been shown to be positively associated with gestational age at birth[10]. However, this association is no longer evident in later infancy (beyond 11 weeks of corrected age). Given that SGA infants are at an increased risk for preterm birth, the epigenetic profiles observed in preterm populations may offer insight into shared biological pathways, although our current study only focused on the epigenetic characteristics of SGA. For example, 5'-C-phosphate-G-3' (CpG) sites mapped to genes such as PLA2G4EM, TRIM9, GRIK3, and MACROD2 have been implicated in neurodevelopment and may represent common targets of interest[11]. Nevertheless, DNAm variations associated with maternal stress among pregnant Black women remain largely unexplored.

      To address these knowledge gaps, we conducted a secondary analysis of a longitudinal cohort study of nulliparous pregnant Black women in the United States between 2010 and 2015. We analyzed DNA extracted from early-pregnancy maternal blood samples and performed an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) to identify epigenetic changes associated with the delivery of SGA infants. The findings from this study may advance our understanding of the early biological pathways underlying fetal growth restrictions and informing future public health strategies and maternal–child health policies.

    • The parent Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to-be (nuMoM2b) was a prospective, longitudinal study that enrolled nulliparous pregnant women between 6 weeks (6 + 0/7) and 13 weeks (13 + 6/7) of gestation. Recruitment occurred between 2010 and 2014 across eight academic medical centers: the University of California, Irvine; the University of Utah, Northwestern University, Indiana University, The Ohio State University, the University of Pittsburgh, the University of Pennsylvania, and Columbia University. Informed consent, either verbal or written, was obtained from all participants as part of the original nuMoM2b study protocol[12]. Our study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Columbia University (#AAAU0215). Inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) Nulliparous pregnant women with singleton pregnancies, and (2) gestational age between 6 weeks 0 days (6 + 0/7) and 13 weeks 6 days (13 + 6/7) at the time of first-trimester enrollment. Participants' exclusion criteria included: (1) Maternal age younger than 13 years, (2) the presence of fetal malformations, (3) fetal aneuploidy, (4) gestational age less than 20 weeks, and (5) planned pregnancy termination. The study included 10,037 women, with a mean age of 26.9 years (standard deviation, SD = 5.7). Participants were predominantly non-Hispanic white (n = 5,988; 59.7%), followed by non-Hispanic Black (14.2%; n = 1,420), Hispanic (16.9%; n = 1,699), Asian (4.0%; n = 406), and other races/ethnicities (5.1%; n = 514). Participants were followed through three standardized study visits during pregnancy, and a fourth visit at delivery. Survey data were collected for participants, including demographic, behavioral and clinical measures, and birth outcomes were abstracted from the electronic health records after delivery.

      For the present study, we conducted analyses of all eligible Black participants (n = 1,073) who provided DNA in the parent study and gave consent for future genetic analyses. Maternal demographic information, including age, body mass index (BMI), educational attainment, and smoking status, as well as the infants' sex, weight, and gestational age were obtained via electronic health record abstraction. We calculated SGA status (< 10th percentile) using Oken criteria[13].

    • Peripheral whole blood samples were obtained from participants during their initial study visit. Genomic DNA was isolated and stored at −80 °C until future processing. Each DNA sample was bisulfite-converted using the EZ-96 DNA Methylation Kit (Zymo Research) and processed on the Infinium MethylationEPIC v2.0 BeadChips (Illumina) at the University of Minnesota Genomics Center.

    • Raw intensity data processing and downstream statistical analysis were performed in R (v.4.0.5). Methylation data were preprocessed using the MethylCallR package, which provides a standardized and EPICv2-aware pipeline for quality control and CpG filtering[14]. Raw IDAT files were imported and quality-filtered on the basis of multiple criteria. Samples were flagged as low-quality and excluded from further analysis if (1) the median log2 signal intensity was below 10.5, following the default threshold implemented in the minfi package[15], or (2) more than 1% of the CpGs exhibited a detection p-value greater than 0.01.

      CpGs were excluded from the analysis if they met any of the following criteria: (1) detection p-value > 0.01 in > 1% of samples, (2) bead count < 3 in > 5% of samples, (3) mapped to a non-CG site, (4) located on sex chromosomes, (5) associated with single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the reference population (African ancestry), (6) flagged as cross-reactive or low-reproducibility CpGs[16], (7) failed to map to the GRCh38 human genome reference, or (8) were EPICv2-specific replicated CpGs.

      After filtering, 121,890 CpGs with poor quality and three samples with suboptimal overall quality were removed. Outlier detection based on the Mahalanobis distance was applied to identify samples with aberrant methylation profiles; 11 samples were flagged as potential outliers and excluded from further analyses. An additional 128 participants were excluded because of missing covariate and/or outcome data. The final analytic dataset included 931 samples and 815,166 high-confidence CpGs for downstream analyses. Data normalization was performed using the Noob (normal–exponential out-of-band) method with an offset of 100, without XY CpG interpolation. To minimize technical confounding, known batch variables, including Sentrix barcodes and sample sections, were adjusted using the MeCall.RemoveBatch function while preserving the phenotype of interest (SGA) during correction. Subsequently, the cell type composition was estimated using MeCall.CellComp, yielding proportions of CD8+ T, CD4+ T, natural killer (NK), and B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils. CpG gene annotation was retrieved using the annotatr R package using annotate_regions function (Supplementary Table S1)[17].

    • We performed a hypothesis-free EWAS without preselecting candidate genes or pathways. Normalized and batch-adjusted data were converted into beta values for downstream analysis. An EWAS was then performed using the MeCall.DMP function (MethylCallR), which implements a linear modeling framework based on the limma package[18]. The primary exposure of interest was infants' SGA status. To control for technical variation and potential confounding, regression models were adjusted for relevant maternal and infant covariates, including maternal age, prenatal smoking status, educational attainment, BMI at the first prenatal visit, infants' sex, estimated leukocyte cell type proportions (CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, NK cells, B cells, monocytes, and neutrophils), and the first 10 principal components (derived from the methylation data). Study participants with missing covariate information were excluded from the study. We performed the EWAS using beta values, which represent the proportion of methylated CpGs, and computed the delta beta (Δβ) for each site. We identified differentially methylated probes (DMPs) using empirical Bayes moderated t-statistics, and multiple testing correction was applied using the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure to control the false discovery rate (FDR).

    • Functional enrichment analysis was conducted using the g:Profiler toolkit (version 0.2.3)[19] to identify overrepresented biological pathways across multiple databases, including Gene Ontology (GO)[20], Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)[21], and Reactome[22]. The analysis included genes linked to DMPs that met a FDR threshold of < 0.1 in the EWAS. No candidate genes or gene sets were preselected; the analysis was performed in a hypothesis-free manner across all CpGs passing quality control, and used a custom reference background derived from the CpGs (n = 815,166) available in the study. To account for multiple testing, Bonferroni correction was applied, and only pathways with an adjusted p-value < 0.05 were retained for interpretation.

    • The study included 931 participants who self-identified as Non-Hispanic Black, of whom 133 (14.3%) delivered SGA infants and 798 (85.7%) delivered appropriate-for-gestational-age (AGA) infants. The mean maternal age at delivery was 23.5 years (SD = 5.3). The majority of the study participants had a college level education (50.4%), followed by high school or less (42.6%), whereas only a small fraction had an education level beyond college (7.0%). The mean BMI was 28.9 (SD = 7.9). There were no statistically significant differences in maternal age, education level, or BMI between the SGA and AGA groups. However, women who delivered SGA infants had a higher rates of smoking during pregnancy (16.5% vs. 9.6%; p = 0.017). SGA infants were also more likely to be female (61.7% vs. 47.4%). The demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population are summarized in Table 1.

      Table 1.  Demographic characteristics of pregnant Black participants.

      Total (n = 931) SGA (n = 133) AGA (n = 798) p-value
      Maternal Age 0.201[1]
      Mean (SD) 23.46 (5.33) 22.85 (4.87) 23.56 (5.40)
      Smoked during pregnancy 0.017[2]
      No 832 (100.0%) 111 (13.3%) 721 (86.7%)
      Yes 99 (100.0%) 22 (22.2%) 77 (77.8%)
      Education 0.069[2]
      High school or less 397 (100.0%) 59 (14.9%) 338 (85.1%)
      Some college or college degree 469 (100.0%) 71 (15.1%) 398 (84.9%)
      Education beyond college 65 (100.0%) 3 (4.6%) 62 (95.4%)
      BMI 0.129[1]
      Mean (SD) 28.86 (7.90) 28.09 (8.18) 28.98 (7.85)
      Infants' sex 0.002[2]
      Female 460 (100.0%) 82 (17.8%) 378 (82.2%)
      Male 471 (100.0%) 51 (10.8%) 420 (89.2%)

      Maternal age refers to the age at enrollment. College includes either college degree or some college experience. p-value refers to Wilcoxon's rank sum test (1) or Pearson's χ2 test (2). SGA, small for gestational age; AGA, average for gestational age; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.
    • We assessed the association between DNA methylation levels at individual CpG sites and SGA status. This analysis revealed 14 DMPs significantly associated with SGA after FDR correction (Table 2, Fig. 1, Supplementary Table S1).

      Table 2.  Differentially methylated CpGs associated with SGA.

      CpG ID Position Gene Symbol Δβ p-value FDR p-value
      cg20911180 chr11: 76,700,751 GUCY2EP 0.010 4.94E-08 0.021
      cg00840694 chr8: 2,046,459 MYOM2 −0.016 6.59E-08 0.021
      cg10928034 chr12: 56,224,331 NABP2, RNF41 0.002 7.85E-08 0.021
      cg10406879 chr6: 165,091,497 0.010 1.54E-07 0.031
      cg15878685 chr4: 68,953,138 UGT2A3 0.008 1.97E-07 0.032
      cg13665149 chr9: 111,794,787 SHOC1 −0.005 2.69E-07 0.036
      cg12669161 chr6: 3,170,598 −0.004 3.09E-07 0.036
      cg01698714 chr6: 6,678,738 −0.005 3.89E-07 0.038
      cg12076876 chr8: 2 046,264 MYOM2 −0.024 4.20E-07 0.038
      cg24020826 chr8: 139,617,937 KCNK9 −0.007 4.64E-07 0.038
      cg14273229 chr13: 80,362,139 LOC105370276 −0.010 5.71E-07 0.039
      cg09396032 chr16: 85,635,856 GSE1 0.008 6.16E-07 0.039
      cg14221454 chr9: 123,584,783 DENND1A −0.004 6.27E-07 0.039
      cg01168757 chr6: 135,173,257 −0.006 7.71E-07 0.045
      Genomic positions are based on the GRCh38/hg38 human reference genome assembly. Δβ, delta beta; FDR, false discovery rate.

      Figure 1. 

      Maternal differentially methylated CpGs associated with SGA. Volcano plot (a) showing hypomethylated (left) and hypermethylated (right) DMPs. CpG sites surpassing the FDR threshold are depicted in red or green, whereas nonsignificant CpGs appear in gray. QQ plot (b) illustrating the distribution of p-values and the calculated genomic inflation factor (λ). Manhattan plot (c) displaying the genomic position of each DMP, with statistically significant sites highlighted in red. Gene and CpG annotations are shown.

      Differences in methylation ranged from Δβ = −0.024 to Δβ = 0.010, with nine CpGs (64%) showing hypomethylation and five (36%) showing hypermethylation in SGA individuals compared with the controls. Ten of these CpGs were annotated to genes including GUCY2EP, MYOM2, NABP2, RNF41, UGT2A3, SHOC1, KCNK9, LOC105370276, GSE1, and DENND1A. Notably, two CpGs, cg00840694 (Δβ = −0.016; adjusted p = 0.021) and cg12076876 (Δβ = −0.024; adjusted p = 0.038), mapped to Intron 1 of MYOM2 and were separated by less than 200 bp, lying within or directly upstream (5 bp) of a candidate cis-regulatory element (cCRE; encyclopedia of DNA elements [ENCODE] accession EH38E2606814).

    • We performed a functional enrichment analysis of 396 genes associated with 346 DMPs identified in our EWAS at an FDR-corrected p-value < 0.10 (Supplementary Table S2). We retained pathways that reached an Bonferroni-corrected threshold of 0.05. This approached identified 18 GO biological processes, 8 cellular components, 2 molecular functions, and 2 REACTOME pathways with an SGA-related epigenetic signature (Fig. 2).

      Figure 2. 

      Pathway enrinchemnt enrichment analysis of DMP-associated genes. Bubble plots display the top enriched GO biological process (GO:BP), cellular components (GO:CC), molecular functions (GO:MF), and REACTOME (REACT) terms derived from DMP-annotated genes. The x-axis represents the enrichment significance (−log10[p-value]). Bubble size indicates the number of genes contributing to each term.

      Of note, our analysis highlighted pathways related to early embryonic development, including "spongiotrophoblast layer development" (GO:0060712, adjusted p = 0.016), "positive regulation of vasculogenesis" (GO:2001214, adjusted p = 0.026), and "anatomical structure development" (GO:0048856, adjusted p = 0.002). Among the genes related to these processes, ADM emerged as key regulator participating in both the "spongiotrophoblast layer development" and "positive regulation of vasculogenesis" pathways (Supplementary Table S3).

    • Our study revealed a maternal epigenetic signature associated with SGA delivery, underscoring the potential role of DNA methylation in placental function and fetal development. We identified 14 CpG sites differentially methylated in association with the maternal risk of SGA delivery, including loci annotated to GUCY2EP, MYOM2, NABP2, RNF41, UGT2A3, SHOC1, KCNK9, LOC105370276, GSE1, and DENND1A. Functional enrichment analysis revealed the involvement of key pathways in early embryonic development and placental function, including "spongiotrophoblast layer development", "positive regulation of vasculogenesis", "anatomical structure development", "cellular developmental process", "multicellular organismal process", and "regulation of metabolic process". Among these, the spongiotrophoblast-like (intermediate) layer plays a particularly critical role in normal placental and fetal development, functioning as a structural, endocrine, and regulatory interface between maternal and fetal tissues[23]. A recent study reported that the development of the human intermediate layer begins around Weeks 4–5 post-conception, expands and functions throughout the second trimester, and persists at the implantation site until delivery[24]. Alterations of this layer or impaired placenta vascular development may lead to fetal growth restriction, thereby increasing the risk of SGA[25]. Normal placental function also requires proper formation, growth, and differentiation, processes that involve the biological functions of anatomical structure development and cellular/multicellular developmental processes[26]. To sustain fetal development, the placenta depends heavily on metabolic processes such as nutrient transport, hormore synthesis, and gas exchange[27]. Disruption of any of these pathways can result in placenta dysfunction and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Additionally, our data reveal that a higher proportion of SGA deliveries were observed in our study among mothers with a greater history of smoking during pregnancy and among those delivering female infants.

      We identified DMP-associated genes that have not been previously associated with SGA, nor studied specifically in Black or nulliparous women. These genes are associated with placental development, vascular remodeling, and fetal growth regulation, indicating their potential contribution to the biological mechanisms leading to SGA. For example, the overexpression of GSE1, encoding for Genetic Suppressor Element 1, has been associated with increased tumor lymph node metastasis, as it promotes trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive gastric cancer cells, indicating its role in cellular proliferation and survival pathways[28]. Animal models have also demonstrated that Gse1 plays a pivotal role in placental development in mice[29]. Deletion of Gse1 in the placental tissue impairs nutrient exchange, leading to placental dysfunction and fetal growth restriction. Together, these findings imply that dysregulation of GSE1's expression through altered DNA methylation may impact placental growth and function, contributing to the risk of SGA.

      Notably, two of the DMPs (cg12076885 and cg12076876) are located in the first exon of MYOM2, within or in close proximity to a cCRE with a proximal enhancer-like signature. MYOM2 encodes for a structural protein localized in cardiac and fast skeletal muscle, anchoring myosin and titin filaments to maintain sarcomeres' integrity and normal muscle contraction[30]. Variants in the gene have been linked to pathological hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and the tetralogy of Fallot in animal models[31]. Although no prior studies have examined MYOM2 variations in pregnancy outcomes, reduced plasma MYOM2 levels have been identified as a biomarker for Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), a condition that may be associated with impaired placental perfusion[31,32]. The identification of multiple CpG sites within a cCRE suggests a potential regulatory mechanism of MYOM2 expression that is relevant to placental or fetal muscle development in SGA pregnancies.

      Additionally, several DMP-related genes point toward biological processes that could plausibly influence fetal growth. For example, differential methylation in NABP2, a gene involved in DNA repair and cellular stress responses, may reflect reduced placental capacity to withstand oxidative or hypoxic insult, potentially compromising trophoblast function and fetal growth[33,34]. Epigenetic changes targeting UGT2A3, part of the placental detoxification and hormone metabolism machinery, may similarly affect the intrauterine environment during critical windows of development, thereby influencing fetal development[35,36]. SHOC1 encodes a key protein for meiotic recombination in both males and females. Biallelic loss-of-function mutations of the gene lead to meiotic defects, maturation arrest, and infertility[37]. Its role in meiosis and chromosomal segregation suggests that dysregulation of SHOC1 in the oocytes could affect embryonic chromosomal stability, placental implantation, and ultimately fetal growth. Finally, epigenetic modulations in KCNK9, an imprinted gene implicated in energy regulation and growth-related syndromes, may contribute to impaired placental or fetal development pathways that underlie growth restriction[38].

      Together, these patterns suggest that the epigenetic alterations we observed interrupt processes that are essential for healthy placental formation, metabolic regulation, and early embryonic development, which are core pathways central to the pathophysiology of SGA.

      Although a few studies have specifically examined DNA methylation in relation to SGA risk among pregnant Black women, prior epigenetic studies in SGA have primarily focused on the candidate genes involved in hypoxia signaling, angiogenesis, and metabolic or imprinted growth regulation, including EPO, H1F1A, VEGFA, LEP, PHLDA2, DHCR24, IGF2, GNASAS, and INSIGF[39,40]. In contrast, none of the loci identified in our study directly overlap with these previously reported candidate genes, suggesting limited gene-level replication. However, functional annotation indicates potential convergence at the pathway level. Our identified genes are involved in developmental processes, cellular developmental processes, and regulation of metabolic processes, which may intersect with the biological processes implicated in hypoxia adaptation, placental function, and fetal growth. Taken together, although our findings do not replicate previously reported candidate loci, they support the notion that SGA-related epigenetic variation may act through broader regulatory networks beyond the canonical hypoxia and growth factor pathways identified in earlier targeted studies. Methodologically, prior studies have primarily used targeted approaches (e.g., polymerase chain reaction-based methods) to assess preselected DNA methylation markers, often across diverse tissue types such as placenta, cord blood, or cell-based models[3942]. In contrast, our study did not focus on preselected candidates but instead provides a more comprehensive assessment of epigenomic variation using maternal blood samples. Though this approach enables broader discovery, it may not fully capture tissue-specific epigenetic changes. Our cohort also includes a wider maternal age range (≥ 13 years) and a relatively larger sample size, particularly for SGA cases, compared with some previous studies. Importantly, our study is among the few to specifically examine the epigenetic changes of SGA within a Black population. These strengths allow our findings to offer a more comprehensive characterization of epigenetic variation within this population. However, several limitations should be acknowledged, including the sample type constraints, the fact that assessments were limited to the first trimester, and the lack of any longitudinal follow-up of child-related outcomes.

      We conducted an EWAS of whole blood from pregnant Black women during the first trimester, a critical window for placental and fetal development. Therefore, the maternal epigenetic alterations that we identified may serve as early biomarkers for SGA risk among Black women. Early identification of such epigenetic signatures could support the development of predictive tools to identify high-risk pregnant women and guide targeted monitoring or intervention strategies aimed at optimizing fetal growth and improving maternal health. These findings highlight the importance of integrating epigenetic biomarkers into precision maternal–fetal medicine to improve pregnancy outcomes. Black women were studied exclusively in our study because they face a disproportionately high risk of SGA delivery compared with other groups. The higher rates of SGA observed among Black women are likely associated with differences in exposure to chronic maternal stress, lower socioeconomic status, disparities in access to prenatal care, and a lack of insurance coverage, all of which may shape epigenetic characteristics. This disparity is driven by the cumulative effects of structural and interpersonal racism, which may be reflected in epigenetic variations.

      Further investigations in pregnant Black women, as well as multiethnic cohorts, are needed to replicate and validate these findings. Future studies should incorporate longitudinal sampling across pregnancy and evaluate how the expression of genes highlighted by these epigenetic changes evolves over time. Integrating maternal methylation data with environmental exposures and adverse social determinants of health factors may also improve our understanding of how these factors jointly contribute to SGA risk. Ultimately, the development of predictive models combining epigenetic, clinical, and demographic biomarkers/risk factors could support early identification of pregnancies at risk and inform prenatal interventions.

      Several strengths of this study merit consideration. A major strength of this study lies in the use of the nuMoM2b cohort, a large, well-characterized population specifically designed to investigate pregnancy outcomes among nulliparous women. Our analytic sample included 931 Black participants, representing one of the largest epigenetic cohorts of pregnant Black women studied to date[43,44]. The standardized recruitment protocol across eight academic medical centers and the longitudinal follow-up through all trimesters ensured consistent data collection and minimized selection bias. Moreover, the inclusion of participants enrolled early in pregnancy (6–13 weeks of gestation), a critical window of time for intrauterine development, strengthens the study's ability to capture early epigenetic changes potentially involved in fetal growth outcomes.

      While our study revealed an intriguing epigenetic signature associated with SGA, several limitations should be acknowledged. The CpGs included in the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC assay represent only the 3% of the CpG sites in the human genome[45]. We did not account for other potential modulators of DNA methylation status, including hormonal levels (such as estrogen, progesterone, and cortisol)[4648], alcohol intake, diet, and comorbidities. The functional consequences of hyper- and hypomethylation at the identified CpG sites cannot be directly inferred, as the relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression is highly dependent on the genomic context and regulatory features. EWASes are subject to inflated test statistic distribution, which, if not properly addressed, may lead to false positive and false negative associations. Additionally, study site information was not available and therefore could not be included as a covariate. We acknowledge that residual site-specific variation, particularly given the environmental sensitivity of epigenetic modifications, may influence DNA methylation profiles. Although we adjusted the data for multiple sources of variability, including unaccounted confounding, individual-level covariates, cell type composition, and batch effects, our data showed moderate inflation (lambda = 1.32). Moreover, epigenetic variation may partially reflect underlying demographic and environmental differences, and future studies with larger and more diverse populations are needed to further disentangle these relationships.

    • Our EWAS identified maternal epigenetic alternations at novel loci and implicates biological pathways involved in early embryonic development and placental function, providing new insight into the mechanisms that may contribute to SGA risk among pregnant Black women. Collectively, these findings highlight the potential of first-trimester DNA methylation profiles as an early biomarker for identifying pregnancies at increased risk of SGA delivery and lay the groundwork for developing precision prenatal screening and intervention strategies.

      • The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and all procedures were approved by the Institutional Review Board of Columbia University (protocol number: AAAU0215, approval date: February 12, 2026).

      • The authors confirm their contributions to the paper as follows: writing original draft, software, visualization: Reho P, Zhao T; investigation: Reho P, Zhao T, Zhao Y; conceptualization: Zhao T, Wu H, Barcelona V; data curation, resources: Wapner R, Barcelona V; formal analysis: Zhao Y, Hazi A; funding acquisition, project administration: Barcelona V; methodology: Zhao Y, Barcelona V; supervision: Wapner R, Wu H, Barcelona V; validation: Zhao Y, Wapner R, Wu H, Barcelona V; writing – review and editing: Reho P, Zhao T, Zhao Y, Samari G, Wapner R, Hazi A, Wu H, Barcelona V. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • NuMoM2b phenotype data are publicly available through the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Data and Specimen Hub NICHD (DASH, https://dash.nichd.nih.gov). Epigenomic data are publicly available through the NIH Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP, https://dbgap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/home) repository under accession number phs003992.v1.p1. Both are controlled access repositories.

      • Biospecimens and associated data were provided by the Nulliparous Pregnancy Outcomes Study: Monitoring Mothers-to- be study (nuMoM2b) and supported by grant funding from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD); U10 HD063036, Research Triangle Institute (RTI) International; U10 HD063072, Case Western Reserve University; U10 HD063047, Columbia University; U10 HD063037, Indiana University; U10 HD063041, University of Pittsburgh; U10 HD063020, Northwestern University; U10 HD063046, University of California Irvine; U10 HD063048, University of Pennsylvania; and U10 HD063053, The University of Utah. This study was supported by NIH/NIMHD K99/R00 Pathway to Independence Award (1K99MD020773, PI Zhao). This study was also supported by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (R01HD110429, PI Barcelona).

      • The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

      • # Authors contributed equally: Paolo Reho, Tingting Zhao

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (2) References (48)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Reho P, Zhao T, Zhao Y, Samari G, Wapner R, et al. 2026. Maternal epigenetic signatures are associated with small for gestational age births among black women. Epigenetics Insights 19: e009 doi: 10.48130/epi-0026-0006
    Reho P, Zhao T, Zhao Y, Samari G, Wapner R, et al. 2026. Maternal epigenetic signatures are associated with small for gestational age births among black women. Epigenetics Insights 19: e009 doi: 10.48130/epi-0026-0006

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return