Search
2024 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Recent progress and prospects in production and identification of umami peptides from marine proteins

  • Authors contributed equally: Di Hu, Zhenxiao Zheng

More Information
  • Umami peptides, the flavor compounds mainly derived from natural proteins, provide a pleasant taste for humans and exhibit a variety of biological activities, such as antioxidant and lipid-lowering properties. Marine proteins, which serve as excellent sources of umami peptides, have become a focal point of research. This review introduces the research progress on reported marine umami peptides. Firstly, it discusses the structural characteristics of umami peptides and the mechanism behind their formation to create an umami taste. It then presents several commonly used techniques for preparing and regulating umami peptides while summarizing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Finally, this review describes the potential application prospects for core technologies within Industry 4.0—such as molecular simulation, artificial intelligence, big data analysis, cloud computing, and blockchain technology—which could bring new opportunities for the development of marine umami peptides.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Table S1 The amino acid sequence and source information of the reported marine umami peptides.
    Supplemental Fig. S1 The amino acid fingerprints of the reported marine umami peptides (a) dipeptide ~ hexapeptide; (b) hexapeptide ~ octapeptide; (c) octapeptide ~ dodecapeptide; (d) tridecanoicpeptide ~ octadecapeptide.
  • [1]

    Zhao Y, Zhang M, Devahastin S, Liu Y. 2019. Progresses on processing methods of umami substances: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 93:125−35

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2019.09.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Ikeda K. 2002. New Seasonings. Chemical Senses 27:847−49

    doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.9.847

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Montmayeur J-P, Liberles SD, Matsunami H, Buck LB. 2001. A candidate taste receptor gene near a sweet taste locus. Nature Neuroscience 4:492−98

    doi: 10.1038/87440

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Damak S, Rong M, Yasumatsu K, Kokrashvili Z, Varadarajan V, et al. 2003. Detection of sweet and umami taste in the absence of taste receptor T1r3. Science 301:850−53

    doi: 10.1126/science.1087155

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Yamaguchi S, Ninomiya K. 1998. What is umami? Food Reviews International 14:123−38

    doi: 10.1080/87559129809541155

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Lindemann B, Ogiwara Y, Ninomiya Y. 2002. The Discovery of Umami. Chemical Senses 27:843−44

    doi: 10.1093/chemse/27.9.843

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Hajeb P, Jinap S. 2015. Umami taste components and their sources in Asian foods. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 55:778−91

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.678422

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Chen M, Gao X, Pan D, Xu S, Zhang H, et al. 2021. Taste characteristics and umami mechanism of novel umami peptides and umami-enhancing peptides isolated from the hydrolysates of Sanhuang Chicken. European Food Research and Technology 247:1633−44

    doi: 10.1007/s00217-021-03734-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Charoenkwan P, Nantasenamat C, Hasan MM, Moni MA, Manavalan B, et al. 2021. UMPred-FRL: a new approach for accurate prediction of umami peptides using feature representation learning. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:13124

    doi: 10.3390/ijms222313124

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Masic U, Yeomans MR. 2014. Umami flavor enhances appetite but also increases satiety. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 100:532−38

    doi: 10.3945/ajcn.113.080929

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zhang Y, Venkitasamy C, Pan Z, Liu W, Zhao L. 2017. Novel umami ingredients: umami peptides and their taste. Journal of Food Science 82:16−23

    doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13576

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Cao L, Halpern BS, Troell M, Short R, Zeng C, et al. 2023. Vulnerability of blue foods to human-induced environmental change. Nature Sustainability 6:1186−98

    doi: 10.1038/s41893-023-01156-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Liu T, Liang Y, Fan S, et al. 2018. Analysis of characteristic taste components of soldier crab (Mictyris brevidactylus). Food Science 14:236−241

    doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201814035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Wang Y, Wang H, Xiang H, Chen S, Zhao Y, et al. 2024. Unlocking the opportunities for creating sustainable, flavorful and healthy high-protein "blue foods": Focusing on the impacts of protein-flavor interactions. Trends in Food Science & Technology 148:104523

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2024.104523

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Li X, Xie X, Wang J, Xu Y, Yi S, et al. 2020. Identification, taste characteristics and molecular docking study of novel umami peptides derived from the aqueous extract of the clam meretrix meretrix Linnaeus. Food Chemistry 312:126053

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.126053

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Alexander LM. 1993. Large marine ecosystems: A new focus for marine resources management. Marine Policy 17:186−98

    doi: 10.1016/0308-597X(93)90076-F

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Aswani S, Basurto X, Ferse S, Glaser M, Campbell L, et al. 2018. Marine resource management and conservation in the Anthropocene. Environmental Conservation 45:192−202

    doi: 10.1017/S0376892917000431

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Cheung RCF, Ng TB, Wong JH. 2015. Marine Peptides: Bioactivities and Applications. Marine Drugs 13:4006−4043

    doi: 10.3390/md13074006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li N, Mahalik NP. 2019. A big data and cloud computing specification, standards and architecture: agricultural and food informatics. International Journal of Information and Communication Technology 14:159−74

    doi: 10.1504/IJICT.2019.097687

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Chen JN, Zhang YY, Huang XH, Dong M, Dong XP, et al. 2023. Integrated volatolomics and metabolomics analysis reveals the characteristic flavor formation in Chouguiyu, a traditional fermented mandarin fish of China. Food Chemistry 418:135874

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135874

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Deng X, Lin H, Ahmed I, Sui J. 2021. Isolation and identification of the umami peptides from Trachinotus ovatus hydrolysate by consecutive chromatography and Nano-HPLC-MS/MS. LWT–Food Science and Technology 141:110887

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110887

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Qi L, Gao X, Pan D, Sun Y, Cai Z, et al. 2022. Research progress in the screening and evaluation of umami peptides. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 21:1462−90

    doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12916

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Zhang J, Zhao M, Su G, Lin L. 2019. Identification and taste characteristics of novel umami and umami-enhancing peptides separated from peanut protein isolate hydrolysate by consecutive chromatography and UPLC–ESI–QTOF–MS/MS. Food Chemistry 278:674−682

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.11.114

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Zhang J, Sun-Waterhouse D, Su G, Zhao M. 2019. New insight into umami receptor, umami/umami-enhancing peptides and their derivatives: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 88:429−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2019.04.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Chisholm B, Nelson D, Schwarcz H. 1983. Marine and terrestrial protein in prehistoric diets on the British Columbia Coast. Current Anthropology 24:396−98

    Google Scholar

    [26]

    Arai S, Yamashita M, Noguchi M, Fujimaki M. 1973. Tastes of L-glutamyl oligopeptides in relation to their chromatographic properties. Agricultural and Biological Chemistry 37:151−56

    doi: 10.1080/00021369.1973.10860638

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Ovchinnikova TV. 2021. Marine peptides: structure, bioactivities, and a new hope for therapeutic application. Marine Drugs 19:407

    doi: 10.3390/md19080407

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Peck LS, Webb KE, Bailey DM. 2004. Extreme sensitivity of biological function to temperature in Antarctic marine species. Functional Ecology 18:625−30

    doi: 10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00903.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Spaggiari G, Di Pizio A, Cozzini P. 2020. Sweet, umami and bitter taste receptors: State of the art of in silico molecular modeling approaches. Trends in Food Science & Technology 96:21−29

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2019.12.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Wang W, Cui Z, Ning M, Zhou T, Liu Y. 2022. In-silico investigation of umami peptides with receptor T1R1/T1R3 for the discovering potential targets: A combined modeling approach. Biomaterials 281:121338

    doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121338

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Diepeveen J, Moerdijk-Poortvliet TCW, van der Leij FR. 2022. Molecular insights into human taste perception and umami tastants: A review. Journal of Food Science 87:1449−65

    doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.16101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Wu B, Eldeghaidy S, Ayed C, Fisk ID, Hewson L, et al. 2022. Mechanisms of umami taste perception: From molecular level to brain imaging. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 62:7015−24

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1909532

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Lee BK, Mayhew EJ, Sanchez-Lengeling B, Wei JN, Qian WW, et al. 2023. A principal odor map unifies diverse tasks in olfactory perception. Science 381:999−1006

    doi: 10.1126/science.ade4401

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Toda Y, Nakagita T, Hayakawa T, Okada S, Narukawa M, et al. 2013. Two Distinct Determinants of Ligand Specificity in T1R1/T1R3 (the Umami Taste Receptor)*. Journal of Biological Chemistry 288:36863−77

    doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.494443

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Zhang F, Klebansky B, Fine RM, Xu H, Pronin A, et al. 2008. Molecular mechanism for the umami taste synergism. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105:20930−34

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810174106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    San Gabriel A, Uneyama H, Yoshie S, Torii K. 2005. Cloning and Characterization of a Novel mGluR1 Variant from Vallate Papillae that Functions as a Receptor for l-glutamate Stimuli. Chemical Senses 30:i25−i26

    doi: 10.1093/chemse/bjh095

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Toyono T, Seta Y, Kataoka S, Harada H, Morotomi T, et al. 2002. Expression of the Metabotropic Glutamate Receptor, mGluR4a, in the Taste Hairs of Taste Buds in Rat Gustatory Papillae. Archives of Histology and Cytology 65:91−96

    doi: 10.1679/aohc.65.91

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Roper SD, Chaudhari N. 2017. Taste buds: cells, signals and synapses. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 18:485−497

    doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.68

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Nango E, Akiyama S, Maki-Yonekura S, Ashikawa Y, Kusakabe Y, et al. 2016. Taste substance binding elicits conformational change of taste receptor T1r heterodimer extracellular domains. Science Report 6:25745

    doi: 10.1038/srep25745

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Nuemket N, Yasui N, Kusakabe Y, Nomura Y, Atsumi N, et al. 2017. Structural basis for perception of diverse chemical substances by T1r taste receptors. Nature Communications 8:15530

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms15530

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Autzen HE, Myasnikov AG, Campbell MG, Asarnow D, Julius D, et al. 2018. Structure of the human TRPM4 ion channel in a lipid nanodisc. Science 359:228−32

    doi: 10.1126/science.aar4510

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Liu H, Da LT, Liu Y. 2019. Understanding the molecular mechanism of umami recognition by T1R1-T1R3 using molecular dynamics simulations. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 514:967−73

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.05.066

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Yin Y, Wu M, Zubcevic L, Borschel WF, Lander GC, et al. 2018. Structure of the cold- and menthol-sensing ion channel TRPM8. Science 359:237−41

    doi: 10.1126/science.aan4325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Zhang N, Yang Y, Wang W, Fan Y, Liu Y. 2021. A potential flavor seasoning from aquaculture by-products: An example of Takifugu obscurus. LWT 151:112160

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112160

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Diez-Ozaeta I, Astiazaran OJ. 2022. Fermented foods: An update on evidence-based health benefits and future perspectives. Food Research International 156:111133

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Raveschot C, Cudennec B, Coutte F, Flahaut C, Fremont M, et al. 2018. Production of bioactive peptides by Lactobacillus species: from gene to application. Frontiers Microbiology 9:2354

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02354

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Yang D, Li C, Li L, Wang Y, Wu Y, et al. 2022. Novel insight into the formation mechanism of umami peptides based on microbial metabolism in Chouguiyu, a traditional Chinese fermented fish. Food Research International 157:111211

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Nasri R, Abdelhedi O, Nasri M, Jridi M. 2022. Fermented protein hydrolysates: biological activities and applications. Current Opinion in Food Science 43:120−27

    doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2021.11.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Wang W, Zhou X, Liu Y. 2020. Characterization and evaluation of umami taste: A review. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 127:115876

    doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2020.115876

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhang Y, Gao X, Pan D, Zhang Z, Zhou T, et al. 2021. Isolation, characterization and molecular docking of novel umami and umami-enhancing peptides from Ruditapes philippinarum. Food Chemistry 343:128522

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128522

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Zhu W, He W, Wang F, Bu Y, Li X, et al. 2021. Prediction, molecular docking and identification of novel umami hexapeptides derived from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). International Journal of Food Science & Technology 56:402−12

    doi: 10.1111/ijfs.14655

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Wang Y, Luan J, Tang X, Zhu W, Xu Y, et al. 2023. Identification of umami peptides based on virtual screening and molecular docking from Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua). Food Function 14:1510−19

    doi: 10.1039/D2FO03776A

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Zhao W, Su L, Huo S, Yu Z, Li J, et al. 2023. Virtual screening, molecular docking and identification of umami peptides derived from Oncorhynchus mykiss. Food Science and Human Wellness 12:89−93

    doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2022.07.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Zhao S, Ma S, Zhang Y, Gao M, Luo Z, et al. 2024. Combining molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation to discover four novel umami peptides from tuna skeletal myosin with sensory evaluation validation. Food Chemistry 433:137331

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.137331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Xu YX, Qu SY, Li T, Zhao HL, Feng Y, et al. 2021. Effects of different proteases on the flavor characteristics of aloididae aloidi muscle hydrolysates. Food Science 42(4):190−96

    doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20190823-248

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Sable R, Parajuli P, Jois S. 2017. Peptides, Peptidomimetics, and Polypeptides from Marine Sources: A Wealth of Natural Sources for Pharmaceutical Applications. Marine Drugs 15:124

    doi: 10.3390/md15040124

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Fu Y, Liu J, Hansen ET, Bredie WLP, Lametsch R. 2018. Structural characteristics of low bitter and high umami protein hydrolysates prepared from bovine muscle and porcine plasma. Food Chemistry 257:163−71

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.02.159

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Tong X, Lian Z, Miao L, Qi B, Zhang S, et al. 2020. An innovative two-step enzyme-assisted aqueous extraction for the production of reduced bitterness soybean protein hydrolysates with high nutritional value. LWT 134:110151

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Hunsakul K, Laokuldilok T, Sakdatorn V, Klangpetch W, Brennan CS, et al. 2022. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis by alcalase and flavourzyme to enhance the antioxidant properties of jasmine rice bran protein hydrolysate. Scientific Report 12:12582

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16821-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Zhang XZ, Liang ZL, Pei JW, et al. 2023. Preparation of umami enzymatic hydrolysate from squid processing by-products by stepwise dual-enzymatic hydrolysis. Food and Fermentation Industries 49(15):201−7

    doi: 10.13995/j.cnki.11-1802/ts.033502

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Wang YM, Zhang Z, Sheng Y, Chi CF, Wang B. 2024. A systematic review on marine umami peptides: Biological sources, preparation methods, structure-umami relationship, mechanism of action and biological activities. Food Bioscience 57:103637

    doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2024.103637

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Aaslyng MD, Elmore JS, Mottram DS. 1998. Comparison of the aroma characteristics of acid-hydrolyzed and enzyme-hydrolyzed vegetable proteins produced from soy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 46:5225−31

    doi: 10.1021/jf9806816

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Aaslyng MD, Martens M, Poll L, Nielsen PM, Flyge H, et al. 1998. Chemical and sensory characterization of hydrolyzed vegetable protein, a savory flavoring. Journal of Agricutral and Food Chemistry 46:481−89

    doi: 10.1021/jf970556e

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Liu Q, Gao X, Pan D, Liu Z, Xiao C, et al. 2023. Rapid screening based on machine learning and molecular docking of umami peptides from porcine bone. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 103:3915−25

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.12319

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Li W, Gu Z, Yang Y, Zhou S, Liu Y, et al. 2014. Non-volatile taste components of several cultivated mushrooms. Food Chemistry 143:427−31

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.08.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Dai L, Reichert CL, Hinrichs J, Weiss J. 2019. Acid hydrolysis behavior of insoluble protein-rich fraction extracted from Chlorella protothecoides. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 569:129−36

    doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.02.064

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Li B, Xie Y, Guo Q. 2024. Thermal acid hydrolysis modulates the solubility of quinoa protein: The formation of different types of protein aggregates. Food Hydrocolloids 151:109825

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2024.109825

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Ruan S, Sun L, Sun X, He J, Zhuang Y. 2021. Novel umami peptides from tilapia lower jaw and molecular docking to the taste receptor T1R1/T1R3. Food Chemistry 362:130249

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Zhang T, Hua Y, Zhou C, Xiong Y, Pan D, et al. 2022. Umami peptides screened based on peptidomics and virtual screening from Ruditapes philippinarum and Mactra veneriformis clams. Food Chemistry 394:133504

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133504

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Zhang MX, Wang XC, Liu Y, Xu XL, Zhou GH. 2012. Isolation and identification of flavour peptides from Puffer fish (Takifugu obscurus) muscle using an electronic tongue and MALDI-TOF/TOF MS/MS. Food Chemistry 135:1463−70

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.06.026

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Liu Z, Zhu Y, Wang W, Zhou X, Chen G, et al. 2020. Seven novel umami peptides from Takifugu rubripes and their taste characteristics. Food Chemistry 330:127204

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127204

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Zhang N, Liu H, Zhou X, Wang W, Fan Y, et al. 2022. Taste and stability characteristics of two key umami peptides from pufferfish (Takifugu obscurus). Food Chemistry 371:131124

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131124

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Zhang Q, Liu R, Geirsdóttir M, Li S, Tomasson T, et al. 2022. Thermal-induced autolysis enzymes inactivation, protein degradation and physical properties of sea cucumber, Cucumaria frondosa. Processes 10:847

    doi: 10.3390/pr10050847

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Xue J, Liu P, Feng L, Zheng L, Gui A, et al. 2023. Insights into the effects of fixation methods on the sensory quality of straight-shaped green tea and dynamic changes of key taste metabolites by widely targeted metabolomic analysis. Food Chemistry: X 20:100943

    doi: 10.1016/j.fochx.2023.100943

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Wang W, Huang Y, Zhao W, Dong H, Yang J, et al. 2022. Identification and comparison of umami-peptides in commercially available dry-cured Spanish mackerels (Scomberomorus niphonius). Food Chemistry 380:132175

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.132175

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Liang J, Chen L, Li YN, Hu X. 2021. Isolation and identification of umami-flavored peptides from Leccinum extremiorientale and their taste characteristic. Journal of Food Processing and Preservation 45:e15255

    doi: 10.1111/jfpp.15255

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Alim A, Yang C, Song H, Liu Y, Zou T, et al. 2019. The behavior of umami components in thermally treated yeast extract. Food Research International 120:534−43

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.11.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Shen Q, Sun L, He Z, Xie J, Zhuang Y. 2023. Isolation, taste characterization and molecular docking study of novel umami peptides from Lactarius volemus (Fr.). Food Chemistry 401:134137

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134137

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Wang W, Yang L, Ning M, Liu Z, Liu Y. 2022. A rational tool for the umami evaluation of peptides based on multi-techniques. Food Chemistry 371:131105

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131105

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Jin Y, Hu D, Chen Q, Shi C, Ye J, et al. 2023. Water-based green and sustainable extraction protocols for value-added compounds from natural resources. Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry 40:100757

    doi: 10.1016/j.cogsc.2023.100757

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Iqbal M, Tao Y, Xie S, Zhu Y, Chen D, et al. 2016. Aqueous two-phase system (ATPS): an overview and advances in its applications. Biological Procedures Online 18:18

    doi: 10.1186/s12575-016-0048-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Wang H, Liu T, Zhao T, Su G, Zhao M, et al. 2023. The Umami-enhancing Ability Improvement of Pea Protein Hydrolysate by Maillard Reaction Utilizing Sugar-derived NADES. Food and Bioprocess Technology 17:2446−58

    doi: 10.1007/s11947-023-03274-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Silva I, Vaz BMC, Sousa S, Pintado MM, Coscueta ER, et al. 2024. Gastrointestinal delivery of codfish skin-derived collagen hydrolysates: deep eutectic solvent extraction and bioactivity analysis. Food Research International 175:113729

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113729

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Ali MS, Roy VC, Park JS, Haque AR, Mok JH, et al. 2024. Protein and polysaccharide recovery from shrimp wastes by natural deep eutectic solvent mediated subcritical water hydrolysis for biodegradable film. Marine Biotechnology

    doi: 10.1007/s10126-024-10321-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Xu Y, Wang Q, Hou Y. 2020. Efficient purification of R-phycoerythrin from marine algae (Porphyra yezoensis) based on a deep eutectic solvents aqueous two-phase system. Marine Drugs 18:618

    doi: 10.3390/md18120618

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Mittal R, Sharma R, Raghavarao K. 2019. Aqueous two-phase extraction of R-phycoerythrin from marine macro-algae, Gelidium pusillum. Bioresource Technology 280:277−86

    doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.044

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Bu Y, Liu Y, Luan H, Zhu W, Li X, et al. 2021. Characterization and structure–activity relationship of novel umami peptides isolated from Thai fish sauce. Food Function 12:5027−37

    doi: 10.1039/D0FO03326J

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Jia R, He Y, Wang GY, et al. 2022. Recent progress in research on umami peptides in food. Meat Researach 36:65−71

    Google Scholar

    [89]

    Heinzelmann K, Franke K. 1999. Using freezing and drying techniques of emulsions for the microencapsulation of fish oil to improve oxidation stability. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 12:223−29

    doi: 10.1016/S0927-7765(98)00077-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Zhang Z. 2012. Study on preparation of powder seasoning from Tilapia by-products. Thesis. Ocean University of China, China. pp. 3-8. www.dissertationtopic.net/doc/1719533

    [91]

    Fu H, Feng Q, Qiu D, Shen X, Li C, et al. 2023. Improving the flavor of tilapia fish head soup by adding lipid oxidation products and cysteine. Food Chemistry 429:136976

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136976

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Ruan L, Ju Y, Zhan C, Hou L. 2022. Improved umami flavor of soy sauce by adding enzymatic hydrolysate of low-value fish in the natural brewing process. LWT 155:112911

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.112911

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Abdo H, Sandeep J, Guillermo GG, Hana T, Mirian P, et al. 2023. Food quality 4.0: from traditional approaches to digitalized automated analysis. Journal of Food Engineering 337:111216

    doi: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2022.111216

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Hassoun A, Alhaj Abdullah N, Aït-Kaddour A, Ghellam M, Beşir A, et al. 2024. Food traceability 4.0 as part of the fourth industrial revolution: key enabling technologies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 64:873−89

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2110033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Bai C, Dallasega P, Orzes G, Sarkis J. 2020. Industry 4.0 technologies assessment: A sustainability perspective. International Journal of Production Economics 229:107776

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107776

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Dadhaneeya H, Nema PK, Arora VK. 2023. Internet of Things in food processing and its potential in Industry 4.0 era: A review. Trends in Food Science & Technology 139:104109

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2023.07.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Hassoun A, Aït-Kaddour A, Abu-Mahfouz AM, Rathod NB, Bader F, et al. 2023. The fourth industrial revolution in the food industry—Part I: Industry 4.0 technologies. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 63:6547−63

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2022.2034735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    de Oliveira-Dias D, Maqueira-Marin JM, Moyano-Fuentes J, Carvalho H. 2023. Implications of using Industry 4.0 base technologies for lean and agile supply chains and performance. International Journal of Production Economics 262:108916

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108916

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Jiang L, Jiang J, Wang X, Zhang Y, Zheng B, et al. 2022. IUP-BERT: identification of umami peptides based on BERT features. Foods 11:3742

    doi: 10.3390/foods11223742

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Pallante L, Korfiati A, Androutsos L, Stojceski F, Bompotas A, et al. 2022. Toward a general and interpretable umami taste predictor using a multi-objective machine learning approach. Scientific Reports 12:21735

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25935-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Xiong Y, Gao X, Pan D, Zhang T, Qi L, et al. 2022. A strategy for screening novel umami dipeptides based on common feature pharmacophore and molecular docking. Biomaterials 288:121697

    doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121697

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Xiu H, Liu Y, Yang H, Ren H, Luo B, et al. 2022. Identification of novel umami molecules via QSAR models and molecular docking. Food Functions 13:7529−39

    doi: 10.1039/D2FO00544A

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Yu Z, Kang L, Zhao W, Wu S, Ding L, et al. 2021. Identification of novel umami peptides from myosin via homology modeling and molecular docking. Food Chemistry 344:128728

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128728

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Wang Y, Liu T, Xie J, Cheng M, Sun L, et al. 2022. A review on application of molecular simulation technology in food molecules interaction. Current Research in Food Science 5:1873−81

    doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2022.10.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Li C, Hua Y, Pan D, Qi L, Xiao C, et al. 2023. A rapid selection strategy for umami peptide screening based on machine learning and molecular docking. Food Chemistry 404:134562

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134562

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Mengucci C, Ferranti P, Romano A, Masi P, Picone G, et al. 2022. Food structure, function and artificial intelligence. Trends in Food Science & Technology 123:251−63

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2022.03.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Zhang J, Yan W, Zhang Q, Li Z, Liang L, et al. 2023. Umami-BERT: An interpretable BERT-based model for umami peptides prediction. Food Research International 172:113142

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2023.113142

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Qi L, Du J, Sun Y, Xiong Y, Zhao X, et al. 2023. Umami-MRNN: Deep learning-based prediction of umami peptide using RNN and MLP. Food Chemistry 405:134935

    doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134935

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Cui Z, Zhang N, Zhou T, Zhou X, Meng H, et al. 2023. Conserved sites and recognition mechanisms of T1R1 and T2R14 receptors revealed by ensemble docking and molecular descriptors and fingerprints combined with machine learning. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 71:5630−45

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00591

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Li M, Zhang X, Zhu Y, Zhang X, Cui Z, et al. 2023. Identifying umami peptides specific to the T1R1/T1R3 receptor via phage display. Journal of Agricutural and Food Chemistry 71:12004−14

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c02471

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Chen Z, Wang R, Guo J, Wang X. 2024. The role and future prospects of artificial intelligence algorithms in peptide drug development. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy 175:116709

    doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2024.116709

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Kou X, Shi P, Gao C, Ma P, Xing H, et al. 2023. Data-Driven Elucidation of Flavor Chemistry. Journal of Agricutural and Food Chemistry 71:6789−802

    doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.3c00909

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Oussous A, Benjelloun FZ, Ait Lahcen A, Belfkih S. 2018. Big Data technologies: A survey. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences 30:431−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.jksuci.2017.06.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Yaqoob I, Hashem IAT, Gani A, Mokhtar S, Ahmed E, et al. 2016. Big data: From beginning to future. International Journal of Information Management 36:1231−47

    doi: 10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Gradinaru TC, Petran M, Dragos D, Gilca M. 2022. PlantMolecularTasteDB: a database of taste active phytochemicals. Frontiers in Pharmacology 12:751712

    doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.751712

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Rojas C, Ballabio D, Pacheco Sarmiento K, Pacheco Jaramillo E, Mendoza M, et al. 2022. ChemTastesDB: A curated database of molecular tastants. Food Chemistry: Molecular Sciences 4:100090

    doi: 10.1016/j.fochms.2022.100090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Zhang W, Ding W, Li YX, Tam C, Bougouffa S, et al. 2019. Marine biofilms constitute a bank of hidden microbial diversity and functional potential. Nature Communication 10:517

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08463-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Wan X, Teng Z, Zhang K, Qiu L, Zhang Z, et al. 2023. Is quality cost or value-added service cost subsidy: Should the ocean big data supply chain adopt which cost subsidy approach of the government? Ocean & Coastal Management 242:106713

    doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106713

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Zhou Q, Zhang H, Wang S. 2022. Artificial intelligence, big data, and blockchain in food safety. International Journal of Food Engineering 18:1−14

    doi: 10.1515/ijfe-2021-0299

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Dagar I, Singh G, Singh PK, Maheshwari S. 2023. A review on evolution, application and future of cloud computing. AIP Con ference Proceedings 2916:050004

    doi: 10.1063/5.0177518

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Pallathadka H, Sajja GS, Phasinam K, Ritonga M, Naved M, et al. 2022. An investigation of various applications and related challenges in cloud computing. Materials Today: Proceedings 51:2245−48

    doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.383

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122]

    Kamilaris A, Fonts A, Prenafeta-Boldύ FX. 2019. The rise of blockchain technology in agriculture and food supply chains. Trends in Food Science & Technology 91:640−52

    doi: 10.1016/j.jpgs.2019.07.034

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Guo C, Liu Y, Na M, Song J. 2023. Dual-layer index for efficient traceability query of food supply chain based on blockchain. Foods 12:2267

    doi: 10.3390/foods12112267

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124]

    Chen H, Zhang P, Li W, Wu M, Li F. 2023. An irreversible ultralong-time dependent anti-counterfeiting strategy based on mixed perovskite halogen separation for marine transportation security. Journal of Solid State Chemistry 326:124183

    doi: 10.1016/j.jssc.2023.124183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125]

    She S, Zhu J, Yi K, Wang X. 2023. Active response from managers: green marine supply chain empathic response mechanism. Ocean & Coastal Management 245:106878

    doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2023.106878

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126]

    Antonucci F, Figorilli S, Costa C, Pallottino F, Raso L, et al. 2019. A review on blockchain applications in the agri-food sector. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 99:6129−38

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.9912

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127]

    Zhao G, Liu S, Lopez C, Lu H, Elgueta S, et al. 2019. Blockchain technology in agri-food value chain management: a synthesis of applications, challenges and future research directions. Com puters in Industry 109:83−99

    doi: 10.1016/j.compind.2019.04.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128]

    Bai W, Liang J, Zhao W, Qian M, Zeng X, et al. 2022. Umami and umami-enhancing peptides from myofibrillar protein hydrolysates in low-sodium dry-cured Spanish mackerel (Scomberomorus niphonius) under the action of Lactobacillus plantarum. International Journal of Food Science & Technology 57: 5494–503

    doi: 10.1111/ijfs.15883

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Hu D, Zheng Z, Liang B, Jin Y, Shi C, et al. 2024. Recent progress and prospects in production and identification of umami peptides from marine proteins. Food Innovation and Advances 3(3): 256−267 doi: 10.48130/fia-0024-0024
    Hu D, Zheng Z, Liang B, Jin Y, Shi C, et al. 2024. Recent progress and prospects in production and identification of umami peptides from marine proteins. Food Innovation and Advances 3(3): 256−267 doi: 10.48130/fia-0024-0024

Figures(4)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(1241) PDF downloads(226)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Recent progress and prospects in production and identification of umami peptides from marine proteins

Food Innovation and Advances  3 2024, 3(3): 256−267  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Umami peptides, the flavor compounds mainly derived from natural proteins, provide a pleasant taste for humans and exhibit a variety of biological activities, such as antioxidant and lipid-lowering properties. Marine proteins, which serve as excellent sources of umami peptides, have become a focal point of research. This review introduces the research progress on reported marine umami peptides. Firstly, it discusses the structural characteristics of umami peptides and the mechanism behind their formation to create an umami taste. It then presents several commonly used techniques for preparing and regulating umami peptides while summarizing the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. Finally, this review describes the potential application prospects for core technologies within Industry 4.0—such as molecular simulation, artificial intelligence, big data analysis, cloud computing, and blockchain technology—which could bring new opportunities for the development of marine umami peptides.

    • Umami has played an essential role in the Chinese diet since ancient times. References to umami can be found in many classical Chinese texts dating back to early history. For instance, during the Song Dynasty (960 AD to 1279 AD), Hong Lin mentioned in 'Shanjia Qing Offering' that bamboo shoots 'taste very fresh', and Yizun Zhu of the Ming Dynasty (1368 AD to 1644 AD) also noted in 'The Secret of Food Constitution' that 'pickled pork had a special umami taste'. These references reflect the historical appreciation and pursuit of umami by the Chinese people, although they were based on subjective perceptions at that time. It was not until Professor Ikeda's groundbreaking work that umami was studied as a scientific issue for the first time. He isolated glutamate from kelp (Laminaria japonica) and discovered its ability to enhance soup flavor. This unique taste, distinct from sour, sweet, bitter, and salty flavors, led Professor Ikeda to coin the term 'umami'[1,2]. However, due to limited systematic scientific research on umami at that time, it was not recognized as a basic taste by the scientific community; instead, it was considered a comprehensive taste associated with pleasure and increased appetite. It wasn't until 2002 when umami receptors (mGlu1/4, T1R1/T1R3) were discovered that umami began to be acknowledged as a fundamental taste[3,4].

      Umami, as a fundamental taste, is generated through complex physiological processes. Initially, umami substances bind to umami receptors, triggering an allosteric effect and producing gustatins. Subsequently, gustatins are further converted into electrical taste signals. Finally, taste signals are transmitted to the cerebral cortex by nerve fibers and sensed by the gustatory center[5,6]. Umami substances come in various forms, mainly including free amino acids and their salts, nucleotides and their salts, organic acids, organic bases, and umami peptides[7,8]. In recent years, umami peptides have emerged as a new form of umami substance that not only enhances the umami taste but also enriches the nutritional value of food, thus becoming a new research focus. Additionally, umami peptides can synergize with salt to enhance the salty taste and reduce the use of salt for better human health[911]. Therefore, it is highly significant to study umami peptides.

      Marine organisms have long been recognized as a crucial source of nutrients for humans, particularly high-quality dietary protein[12,13]. Oceans cover 71% of the Earth's surface area and contain vast amounts of resources. In comparison to land-sourced protein, marine protein production causes less environmental stress[14]. Various marine proteins possess a delicious and unique taste and are important raw materials for the preparation of umami peptides[15]. Furthermore, the extraction of umami peptides from marine proteins is an important method to promote the development and utilization of marine resources, which holds significant strategic importance[1618].

      Compared with the land-sourced umami peptides, marine umami peptides have their advantages: Firstly, they are more widely sourced as the area of the ocean is nearly two and a half times larger than that of the land on earth, and the diversity of species in the ocean is far greater than that on land. Secondly, marine umami peptides have higher nutritional value as they usually contain ω-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), minerals, and trace elements such as iodine, zinc, and selenium, which are important for human health. Lastly, marine organisms are rich in umami substances, resulting in an intense umami taste with a more obvious umami-enhancing effect[1921]. However, it should be noted that current research on marine umami peptides is still in its infancy. The preparation and extraction of these peptides are traditional and lack systematic summary. Therefore, based on existing research findings, summarizing the current progress of marine umami peptides and prospecting new technologies for their application would be beneficial for subsequent research and development efforts in this field.

      In this review, the sequence and structural characteristics of reported marine umami peptides are summarized and analyzed systematically. Then, the recognition mechanism of marine umami peptides and their receptors are introduced, followed by the analysis of the signal transduction mechanism. Next, the preparation and regulation techniques of marine umami peptides are summarized. Finally, the application of Industry 4.0 technologies (molecular simulation, artificial intelligence, blockchain, big data, cloud computing) in the study of marine umami peptides are introduced and their future development is prospected. This review aims to introduce the current research of marine umami peptides and prospect the future trends of the methods applied in the subsequent study of marine umami peptides.

    • The amino acid sequence and source information of the reported marine umami peptides that have been reported were shown in Supplemental Table S1 and the distribution of the identified marine umami peptides are shown in Fig. 1. To date, 141 marine umami peptides have been identified, of which 104 are short-chain peptides (dipeptides to nonapeptides), accounting for 73.76%. The number of medium and long-chain polypeptides (decapeptides to eighteen peptides) is 37, accounting for 26.24%. It can be seen that most of the marine umami peptides are short chain peptides. This is consistent with previous studies of umami peptides from other sources[8,22,23]. Specifically, the top three types of marine umami peptides are heptapeptides (23, 16.31%), nonapeptides (17, 12.06%) and hexapeptides (14, 9.93%). The last four types of marine umami peptides are tridecanoic peptides (3, 2.13%), tetradeca peptides (3, 2.13%), hexadecapeptides (2, 1.42%) and octadecapeptides (1, 0.71%). It can be observed from this that the longer the peptide chain, the lower the likelihood of it being umami peptides. In addition, from the view of the amino acid composition of umami peptides, it is found that 85.11% of 120 marine umami peptides contain umami amino acids (glutamic acid or aspartic acid). Zhang et al.[24] summarized the amino acid composition of umami peptides and found that among all umami peptides, those containing umami amino acids accounted for 79.00%, which was lower than the 85.11% found in marine umami peptides. This suggests that marine umami peptides contain a higher proportion of umami amino acids.

      Figure 1. 

      The information of the identified marine umami peptides. (a) The distribution of the identified marine umami peptides. (b) The percentage of marine umami peptides with umami amino acid (D: aspartic acid, E: glutamic acid).

      Furthermore, the types and sequences of amino acids that compose umami peptides also have a great influence on the taste characteristics of peptides[25]. The study of Arai et al.[26] found that the umami taste can only be presented when hydrophilic amino acid is located at the C-terminus. Zhang et al.[24] proposed that the proportion of alkaline amino acids in umami peptides should not be excessively high, as alkaline amino acids are typically found at the end of the polypeptide chain. The amino acid fingerprints of the reported marine umami peptides are shown in Supplemental Fig. S1. In all identified marine peptides, the top four amino acids are glutamic acid (E), accounting for 11.41%, alanine (A) (9.41%), leucine (L) (9.32%) and aspartic acid (D) (9.22%), which are mainly umami/acidic amino acids and hydrophobic amino acids. The last four amino acids are tyrosine (Y) (1.62%), cysteine (C) (1.24%), tryptophan (W) (1.24%). According to the classification of amino acid properties, the proportion of acidic/umami amino acids is 20.63%. The data for alkaline, hydrophilic and hydrophobic amino acids is 13.30%, 29.85%, and 36.23%, respectively (Fig. 2). It can be seen that among all the amino acids composing marine umami peptides, the proportion of acidic/umami amino acid is significantly higher than that of alkaline amino acids, and the proportion of hydrophobic amino acids is higher than that of hydrophilic amino acids. Regarding the order of peptide sequences, it can be observed that hydrophilic and basic amino acids are primarily distributed at the ends of the peptide chain, while hydrophobic and acidic amino acids are mainly distributed in the middle of the peptide chain.

      Figure 2. 

      The amino acid composition of the reported marine umami peptides according to the amino acid features.

      The advanced structure of marine umami peptides mainly refers to its secondary structure, including α-helix, β-folding and random curling, etc. The unique marine environment (high salt, low temperature, and high pressure) contributes to the strong stability and adaptability of the structure of marine umami peptides. For instance, the α-helix structure in marine umami peptides enhance their stability, allowing them to maintain biological activity even in extreme environments. In addition, marine umami peptides may also contain special modification groups, such as phosphate groups, sugar groups, etc., which can increase their water solubility and biological activity[27,28].

    • The taste formation mechanism of marine umami peptides is similar to that of umami peptides from other sources. Initially, umami peptides and receptors (T1R1/T1R3, mGlu1/4) recognize each other in the mouth, leading to the allosteric effects[29,30]. Once the receptor is activated, it produces the corresponding umami gustducin, which further transforms into an umami signal further. Subsequently, the signal molecules bind to their respective receptors and activate taste bud ion channels located on the cell membrane. This activation leads to the release of signal molecules from the cell and their transmission to the nerve center through the taste nerve fibers, resulting in the perception of umami (Fig. 3)[31,32].

      Figure 3. 

      Schematic diagram of the flavor mechanism of umami peptides (adapted from[32]).

    • The receptors for umami peptides are a class of membrane proteins called G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRS). Specifically, the umami peptide receptors mainly include T1R1 and T1R3. T1R1 is co-expressed with T1R3. T1R1/T1R3 heteromer in humans is primarily responsible for detecting and responding to umami substances[29,33,34]. When the umami substance interacts with the T1R1/T1R3 receptor, T1R1/T1R3 initiates signaling pathways that transmit taste information to the brain, resulting in the perception of umami taste[35]. Besides T1R1/T1R3, the umami receptors also include some metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs). MGluRs are also members of the GPCRs family, responsible for the neurotransmitter glutamate. There are eight subtypes of mGluRs, which are classified into three groups based on sequence homology, signal transduction mechanisms, and pharmacological properties. The identified mGluRs umami receptors include mGluR1[36] and mGluR4[37].

    • The analysis of the recognition and transduction mechanism of marine umami peptides is an effective way to study the taste mechanism of umami peptides and mine new umami peptides. Among all umami receptors, heterodimer T1R1/T1R3 receptors are mainly distributed in the front of the tongue. They come into contact with umami substances once the umami substances get into the mouth. Other receptors (mGluR1 and mGluR4) located in the back of the tongue, which results in the lag in its contact with umami substances. Therefore, heterodimer T1R1/T1R3 receptors were identified as the best candidates for umami receptors[38]. All members of the T1R class have a similar structure, that is, the seven-spanning transmembrane region (7TM) and the N-terminal extracellular terminal region[39]. The extracellular terminal region consists of a large 'venus fly trap' (VFT) and a small cysteine-rich domain (CRD). The VFT is the main binding domain for umami ligand recognition, while the CRD mainly connects the VFT domain and the 7TM domain, which is responsible for the transmembrane transmission of the structural changes that occur after VFT ligand recognition[40].

      At present, the mechanism of the interaction between umami peptides and umami receptors has not been clarified clearly[32]. Evidence from immunocytochemical and molecular studies suggest that stimulation of umami receptor heterodimers T1R1/T1R3 by umami substances activate the G protein subunit Gα, leading to the release of the Gβγ subunit and stimulating the phospholipase PLCβ2 pathway, which produces inositol-1,4,5-triphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG)[41,42]. The increase of Ca2+ activates the TRPM5 transient receptor potential, leading to the depolarization of taste cells. Taste cells then evoke action potentials through sodium channels and release ATP, which is converted into electrical signals to activate taste nerve fibers, thereby generating umami perception[43]. Although it has been widely recognized that umami receptor heterodimers T1R1/T1R3 stimulate the G protein subunits leading to umami signal transduction, the interaction between umami receptors and ligands and the conformational changes of the receptors after binding umami substances, remain to be examined systematically.

    • Marine umami peptides refer to peptides prepared from marine proteins with an umami taste. The processing methods for these peptides can vary due to the diverse sources of marine proteins. Common processing methods include microbial fermentation, enzymatic hydrolysis, acid hydrolysis, high-temperature processing, and solvent extraction (see Table 1).

      Table 1.  Overview of the preparation methods for marine umami peptides.

      Methods Mechanism Advantages Disadvantages Ref.
      Microbial fermentation Microbial metabolism degrades marine proteins into peptides Simple operation, safety and low cost High environmental requirements [50,87]
      Enzymatic hydrolysis Proteases specifically cleave hydrolytic peptide bonds Mild reaction conditions, green environmental protection, and high yield Poor control of the reaction leads to the production of undesirable by-products [21,50,51,54]
      Acid hydrolysis Proteins are hydrolyzed under acidic conditions Low cost and high yield Toxic substances are easily produced in the reaction process [66,100]
      High-temperature
      processing
      Protein degrades into small parts under thermal treatment Simple operation and high efficiency High energy consumption and high requirements for equipment [30,6872]
      Solvent extraction The majority of umami peptides are soluble in water Simple operation and low cost Low efficiency [44,75]
    • Microbial fermentation is a method that utilizes microbial metabolism to degrade marine proteins and obtain marine umami peptides. The vigorous metabolic reaction of microorganisms coverts macromolecular organic matter into amino acids, peptides, organic acids, and other substances[4446]. Yang et al.[47] found that the production of umami peptides based on microbial metabolism in Chouguiyu was strongly correlated with 22 protease-producing microbial genera, among which Vagococcus, Peptostreptococcus, Acinetobacter, Psychrobacter, and Enterococcus played a major role in the formation of umami peptides. Microbial fermentation has the advantages of fast speed and low cost. At the same time, microbial fermentation does not require the separation and purification of proteins and enzymes, which reduces the production cost and simplifies the operation[48]. Therefore, the use of proteolytic microorganisms to extract umami peptides from animal and plant proteins is more cost-effective and practical than traditional enzymatic hydrolysis. However, microbial fermentation requires high environmental hygiene and is easily contaminated by other bacteria during the fermentation process. As a green and environmentally friendly method for the preparation of marine umami peptides, microbial fermentation has great potential for umami peptide preparation. Future research should focus on the screening of highly resistant strains to achieve more application prospects.

    • Enzymatic hydrolysis is one of the commonly used methods for the preparation of marine umami peptides. Enzymes can break down proteins into peptides with different molecular weights and free amino acids, which are key umami compounds[49]. Various enzymes such as complex protease[50], pepsin, trypsin[5154], flavourzyme, papain[21], chymotrypsin[52,53] are commonly employed in enzymatic hydrolysis. The reaction conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis are mild, safe and efficient, easily controlled, and do not produce toxic and harmful substances. This makes it a key technology for developing seafood seasoning[55,56]. Studies have shown that sequential hydrolysis of endonuclease and exonuclease can improve efficiency, reduce bitterness, and enhance the umami taste[57,58]. Flavor protease contains both endo-cut enzyme and exo-cut enzyme activities. These enzymes effectively degrade exposed hydrophobic groups and hydrolyze certain flavor precursor substances to facilitate the formation of high-quality flavor products[59]. To enhance proteolysis and prepare good flavor umami peptides, many researchers have utilized double enzyme hydrolysis methods. For example, Deng et al.[21] prepared and identified umami peptides from Trachinotus ovatus using enzymatic hydrolysis with papain and flavourzyme. Additionally, a stepwise dual-enzymatic hydrolysis process using alkaline and flavor protease was employed to prepare umami enzymatic hydroxylate from squid processing by-products[60].

    • Under acidic conditions, proteins can undergo hydrolysis reactions to produce peptides or amino acids[61]. Acid hydrolysis is characterized by its simple process, low cost and high-efficiency, making it a widely used method for protein hydrolysis[6264]. Hydrochloric acid is often used to hydrolyze food proteins to produce umami substances for food flavoring[61,65]. However, during the acid hydrolysis process of preparing marine umami peptides, toxic and carcinogenic substances such as chloropropanol could be generated as by-products[66]. Compared with enzymatic hydrolysis, acid hydrolysis requires more severe reaction conditions[67], which has led to its gradual replacement by other methods.

    • Many researchers have utilized high-temperature methods for the preparation of water extracts containing umami peptides[6872]. During the heating process, proteins degrade into smaller components[73,74]. Wang et al. obtained 29 peptide fragments through high-temperature water boiling combined with gel ultrafiltration and gel filtration chromatography and identified four of them as umami peptides[75]. Additionally, three umami peptides were isolated and purified from Leccinum extremiorientale using high-temperature cooking[76]. Alim et al. separated and purified 15 types of umami peptides from thermally treated yeast extract, with an optimum reaction temperature of 110 °C for umami peptide generation[77]. High-temperature processing is a common method for extracting nutrients from foods; therefore, the process of preparing umami peptides by this method is simple and suitable for industrial production. However, it is important to strictly control the temperature and heating time to avoid excessive hydrolysis and denaturation of the protein.

    • Because most umami peptides are water-soluble, water-based solvent extraction is commonly used for their extraction. Hot water extraction is a traditional method for obtaining umami peptides. Four umami peptides were identified from Lactarius volemus aqueous extracts, with one peptide (EVAEALDAPKTT) having a very low umami threshold of only 0.0625 mg/mL[78]. To enhance extraction efficiency, solvent extraction is often combined with high-temperature treatment, homogenization, ultrasonic treatment, and other methods[61]. Wang et al. extracted proteins and peptides from Takifugu flavidus using homogenization and a water-based solvent extraction method, resulting in the identification of four peptides with umami taste[79]. The process of solvent extraction is straightforward and does not require expensive equipment. However, it has the disadvantage of high energy consumption and long extraction time[61]. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in natural green extraction solvents, such as aqueous two-phase and deep eutectic solvent (DES), for extracting bioactive substances, making it a research hotspot[80,81]. These solvents have also been applied to the extraction of marine umami peptides. For example, DES composed of glucose, sucrose, and water was used to enhance the umami-enhancing capacity of pea protein hydrolysate[82]. Although there are currently few reports on the application of natural green extraction solvents, their potential in the extraction of marine umami peptides can be seen based on their extensive use in extracting bioactive substances[8386].

    • During the process of preparing marine umami protein and peptides products, it is inevitable that some unique substances from marine organisms will be incorporated into them, such as ω-3PUFA and astaxanthin. However, these substances will produce many unpleasant flavors after oxidation. Moreover, umami peptides may be decomposed by temperature, pH, and other conditions during processing or storage, leading to a significant reduction in their umami taste. Therefore, it is necessary to use embedding and adding amino acids in the actual production process to regulate the umami taste and maintain the stability of these products.

    • Embedding is a technique used to immobilize active substances (such as drugs, enzymes, proteins, etc.) in a carrier material. This technique serves various purposes including protecting the active substance, prolonging its duration of action, improving stability, and controlling the release rate[87]. In the food industry, embedding can also be utilized to immobilize food additives or condiments in carriers to achieve specific release characteristics. Currently, spray drying and freeze drying are commonly employed methods for embedding umami peptides[88]. The process of microencapsulation through spray drying and freeze drying involves preparing a mixed emulsion of heartwood and wall material first, followed by spraying or freeze-drying the emulsion in a desiccator[89]. While these methods effectively prevent the oxidation of umami peptides and their reaction with other substances which could weaken their flavor profile, they do have drawbacks such as high energy consumption and low automation control level[90].

    • The amino acid addition method is a technique to regulate the umami taste by adding pure amino acids or amino acids mixture into the umami protein or peptide products. These amino acids or amino acids mixtures can cooperate with other flavorful peptides, nucleotides, and other substances contained in food to further enhance umami taste. Fu et al.[91] improved the umami taste of the umami peptides in fish head soup by adding cysteine. Similarly, Ruan et al.[92] maintained the umami taste of soy sauce by adding hydrolysate from low-value fish. The addition of amino acids is a direct method for increasing the umami flavor of products. While this process is simple, it requires exploration and optimization of the amount of added amino acids in the early laboratory stages, which may also result in additional economic costs being incurred at that time.

    • Recently, various global challenges, including global warming, increasing global population, overfishing, and other ecosystem damage, make it necessary for human beings to further innovate, study, and carry out sustainable development and utilization of marine resources. Therefore, Industry 4.0 technology has received great attention in recent years to improve efficiency and productivity and enhance sustainability[93,94]. Industry 4.0, categorized according to different stages of industrial development represents an era in which information technology is utilized to drive transformation within the industry. The artificial intelligence, big data analysis, Internet of Things, blockchain, smart sensors, robotic and cyber-physical systems are some of the technologies featured in Industry 4.0[95,96], and emerges as a way to improve the competitiveness of marine food[97,98]. Industry 4.0 technology has been used widely in the simulation of the interaction between the marine umami peptides and their receptors, the rapid screening and structure prediction of marine umami peptides, and the establishment and sharing of marine umami peptides database[99101]. Furthermore, Industry 4.0 technology holds significant potential for the collection and processing of characteristic data and traceability analysis of marine umami peptides. This section introduces and prospects the application of Industry 4.0 technologies (molecular simulation, artificial intelligence, big data, cloud computing, and blockchain) in the study of marine umami peptides (Fig. 4), aiming to promote their application in the subsequent scientific research of marine umami proteins and peptides.

      Figure 4. 

      The application prospect of Industry 4.0 in marine umami peptides.

    • Molecular simulation (MS) technology is a method that uses computers to simulate the behavior and properties of molecular systems at the atomic or molecular level[102]. MS technology has been applied to the study of marine umami peptides, mainly including the following aspects: (1) Interaction simulation: the interaction between marine umami peptides and other molecules (such as receptors and enzymes) can be simulated, and the mechanism of action and binding mode in vivo can be predicted, which is helpful for studying the biological activity and pharmacological effects of marine umami peptides. The interaction between shrimp umami peptide and its receptor was simulated through homology modeling and molecular docking and the results indicated that amino acid residues Arg151, Asp147 and Gln52 might be the key binding sites[103]. Five umami peptides were obtained from Meretrix lusoria, and explored the interaction between these umami peptides with T1R1/T1R3 by molecular simulation technology[19]. The results indicated that the peptides could enter the binding pocket in the Venus flytrap domain of the T1R3 cavity, wherein Asp196 and Glu128 may play key roles in the sensation of umami taste. Moreover, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions are important interaction forces. (2) Structural prediction: molecular simulation technology can help researchers to predict and simulate the molecular structure of marine umami peptides, including three-dimensional structure, conformation and stability analysis of proteins, peptides, and other molecules, so as to help understand their functions and biological activities. Bu et al.[87] studied the characterization and structure-activity relationship of novel umami peptides isolated from Thai fish sauce by molecular simulation technology combined with quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR). The results indicated that the umami peptide chains were rotated and folded obviously, and hydroxyphenyl group of the N-terminal tyrosine residue side chain rotated significantly, which may enhance the umami taste. Although molecular simulation technology can effectively simulate the structural change process of biological macromolecules dynamically, the internal structure of biological systems, with uncertainties that change over time, is much more complex than imagined[104]. Therefore, the simulation process of biomacromolecules also has certain limitations, which require the improvement of computing software and hardware as much as possible to meet the needs of solving practical problems.

    • Artificial intelligence (AI) is the technology of creating and applying intelligent machines or software that can mimic, augment, and extend human intelligence. The research field of artificial intelligence covers robotics, language recognition, image recognition, natural language processing, etc. The goal is to make computers have the ability to think and make decisions like humans[105,106]. The application of AI in marine umami peptides mainly includes the following aspects: (1) Discovering new marine umami peptides involves the use of advanced techniques such as machine learning and deep learning. By analyzing large quantities of known peptides, researchers can model and predict their structure and taste. This approach holds great potential for advancing our understanding of marine umami peptides and their applications in various fields. Meanwhile, virtual screening combined with AI could be used to determine their biological activities and taste characteristics, helping to accelerate the discovery of new marine peptides. Zhang et al.[107] investigated an interpretable BERT-based AI model to realize rapid screening of new umami peptides with a computational accuracy of 93.23%. Qi et al.[108] developed a novel peptide sequence-based umami peptide predictor, namely Umami-MRNN, which was based on multi-layer perceptron and recurrent neural network. The independent tests have shown that Umami-MRNN achieved an accuracy of 90.5%. (2) Prediction of allosteric effects can be achieved by integrating and analyzing a substantial amount of experimental data, in combination with methodologies such as machine learning and network analysis. This approach allows for the elucidation of the mechanism of action and signaling pathways associated with marine umami peptides. This helps to understand the function of marine umami peptides in cells and provides a theoretical basis for further application and development. Cui et al.[109] predicted the conserved sites and recognition mechanisms of T1R1 through ensemble docking combined with machine learning. The results indicated that residues 107S-109S, 148S-154T, and 247F-249A mainly form hydrogen bonding contacts, which might be the key binding sites during the sensation of umami. The binding processing of two umami peptides (MTLERPW and MNLHLSF) with T1R1 was predicated by Li et al.[110] through phage display combined with AI, and the key binding sites (MW-7 and MF-7) in the VFT were identified. (3) Utilizing AI technology, the analysis of large-scale marine umami peptide sequences can be conducted through bioinformatics techniques such as sequence alignment, structure prediction, and functional annotation. This approach is beneficial for predicting the characteristics of marine umami peptides and establishing a reference threshold for their properties. An AI system for taste analysis based on a graph neural network was developed by Lee et al.[33], which could predict the taste threshold of marine umami peptides based on their structure, providing a new method for the perception research of marine umami peptides. AI relies on a large amount of high-quality data for training and verification, with the database serving as the foundation for AI model testing and training[111]. AI relies on a large amount of high-quality data for training and verification, with the database serving as the foundation for AI model testing and training[111]. Therefore, AI requires a substantial volume of accurate data and computational resources to train, optimize, and support research related to umami peptides. The collection of such data has become a limiting factor in the application of AI in the development of umami peptides. However, as the model improves and more data is accumulated, AI will create new opportunities for the advancement of marine umami peptides.

    • Big data technology is a data processing technique that utilizes computer systems and network technology to process massive amounts of data. It aims to extract useful information from the data through association analysis and prediction. Big data technology is characterized by its volume, velocity, variety, and value. The primary function of big data is to record, describe, and predict various phenomena[112114]. In the context of marine umami peptides, the application of big data encompasses several key aspects. Firstly, it involves the establishment and sharing of databases. By integrating and sharing characteristic data related to marine umami peptides, a specialized database can be developed. This database is a valuable resource for studying marine umami peptides, ultimately expediting research processes and fostering collaboration within the field. Gradinaru et al.[115] and Rojas et al.[116] collected a large number of characteristic information of umami substances through big data technology and established two open access umami databases (PlantMolecularTasteDB and ChemTastesDB), which greatly facilitated the subsequent research on marine umami peptides. Secondly, by utilizing big data analytics, marine biological scientists and researchers can effectively process large-scale marine biological data to gain a better understanding of the genomic, proteomic, and metabolomic features of marine organisms. This will enable them to explore the biosynthetic pathways and properties of umami peptides[117]. Finally, the promotion and marketing of marine umami peptide products can benefit from the application of big data technology for consumer behavior analysis. By analyzing consumer data and market trends, a better understanding of consumer needs and preferences can be obtained, which in turn can guide the promotion and marketing strategies of marine umami peptide products. This approach allows for a more targeted and effective marketing strategy that is based on empirical evidence and insights into consumer behavior[118]. From a functional perspective, the application of big data in marine umami peptides primarily involves the collection of various relevant data. Therefore, the challenges of applying big data in marine umami peptides lie in the capacity, source, and quality of the data[119].

    • Cloud computing technology is an internet-based computing model, which provides a variety of computing services through the network, including storage, database, software, analysis and processing capabilities. The application of cloud computing in the development and utilization of marine umami peptides are still in their early stages. The application might include the following aspects: (1) Data storage and processing: the study of marine umami peptides requires a large amount of data storage and processing, including gene data and protein data of marine biological samples. Cloud computing can provide efficient data storage and processing capabilities to help researchers quickly analyze the components and characteristics of marine umami peptides. (2) Virtual experiments and simulations: through the cloud computing platform, researchers can conduct virtual experiments and simulations to explore the biological activities, pharmacological effects and other characteristics of marine umami peptides, to accelerate research progress. Although the function of cloud computing has greatly facilitated the discovery of new marine umami peptides, the nature of cloud computing also brings challenges for cloud computing applications[120,121]. The main challenges of cloud computing in marine umami peptide is data security[19]. Because the cloud computing provider has complete control over all operations, malicious detection, service manipulation and economic denial-of-service attacks by the provider are the potential threats of data being damaged or breached[121].

    • Blockchain technology is a distributed database-based technology that is capable of recording and storing transaction data. It possesses the characteristics of decentralization, non-tampering, and transparency. At its core, blockchain technology consists of a chain structure composed of a series of blocks, with each block containing a specific amount of transaction data. The security and consistency of the data are ensured through encryption algorithms and consensus mechanisms[122]. Blockchain technology has a wide range of applications in the downstream management of marine umami peptides. Firstly, through the use of blockchain technology, it is possible to achieve full traceability of marine umami peptide products. This means that every stage in the production, processing, and transportation of each batch of products can be recorded on the blockchain. As a result, consumers can access detailed information about the product such as its source, production date, and production process by scanning the two-dimensional code on the product or querying relevant information. This increased transparency and credibility serves to enhance consumer confidence in the product[123]. Secondly, the authenticity of marine umami peptide products can be verified using blockchain technology. Each batch of products is assigned a unique blockchain identity, allowing consumers to verify the product's authenticity by scanning the two-dimensional code or entering relevant information. This ensures that the purchased product is genuine[124]. Thirdly, supply chain management: Blockchain technology has the potential to enhance the supply chain management of marine umami peptide products[125]. By integrating all aspects of the supply chain into a blockchain network, real-time monitoring and transparent management can be achieved. This reduces information asymmetry and risk within the supply chain while improving efficiency and reliability[126]. The high-cost problem is a significant challenge when applying blockchain technology in the marine umami industry. Embedding blockchain technology into the marine umami peptide traceability system requires a substantial investment of both time and money for participants. As the complexity of the blockchain increases, so does the need for additional computing power to confirm more blocks, resulting in higher power consumption[127]. Furthermore, as the number of transactions within the marine umami peptide tracking system grows, so does the volume of data. This increase in data creates challenges related to storage and computation, ultimately reducing the capacity scale of the system and increasing synchronization time for new users[127,128].

    • As a treasure house of natural resources, the ocean contains a huge amount of marine proteins. The preparation of umami peptides from these marine proteins is an important way to utilize ocean resources. This review summarized the amino acid composition, characteristics, and sequence information of the reported 141 marine umami peptides. Additionally, the taste mechanism and preparation methods of marine umami peptides were introduced. According to the current research results, most marine peptides are composed of four to ten amino acids and abundant in umami/hydrophobic amino acids. The preparation methods of marine umami peptides include microbial fermentation, enzymatic hydrolysis, acid hydrolysis, high-temperature processing, and solvent extraction. Each method has its advantages and disadvantages, better results may be obtained by using the combined methods. At the same time, embedding methods and amino acid addition were commonly used to adjust umami taste, which had the advantages of simple operation and was suitable for industrial production. Finally, the existing ongoing projects regarding the application of Industry 4.0 technology in marine umami peptides were introduced and the future trends of its application prospected. Based on the current state of research, several Industry 4.0 technologies (molecular simulation, artificial intelligence, and big data) have been widely utilized in simulating the interaction between the marine umami peptides and their receptors, rapidly screening and predicting the structure of marine umami peptides, as well as establishing and sharing a database of marine umami peptides. The use of cloud computing and blockchain is still in its early stages. Prospective applications may include the collection and processing of characteristic data, traceability analysis of marine umami peptides etc. Essentially, the core technology of Industry 4.0 primarily serves as information storage and data processing tools that greatly enhance researchers' work efficiency. Furthermore, in order to better understand the properties and applied research of marine umami peptides, it is necessary to encourage and stimulate more investment in biotechnology to promote the sustainable development and utilization of these marine resources in the future.

    • The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: data curation: Hu D, Zheng Z, Liang B, Jin Y, Shi C, Chen Q, Wei L; writing-original draft: Hu D, Zheng Z; writing-review & editing: Dong X, Lu Y; conceptualization: Jin Y, Shi C, Lu Y; literature arrangement: Chen Q, Wei L; software, investigation: Li D, Li C; project administration, resources: Ye J, Dai Z; funding acquisition: Lu Y. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

      • The authors are grateful to the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFD2100203), the Natural Science Fund of Zhejiang Province (LQ22C200008) and Basic research funds for provincial colleges and universities (FR2401ZD).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Authors contributed equally: Di Hu, Zhenxiao Zheng

      • Supplemental Table S1 The amino acid sequence and source information of the reported marine umami peptides.
      • Supplemental Fig. S1 The amino acid fingerprints of the reported marine umami peptides (a) dipeptide ~ hexapeptide; (b) hexapeptide ~ octapeptide; (c) octapeptide ~ dodecapeptide; (d) tridecanoicpeptide ~ octadecapeptide.
      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of China Agricultural University, Zhejiang University and Shenyang Agricultural University. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  Table (1) References (128)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Hu D, Zheng Z, Liang B, Jin Y, Shi C, et al. 2024. Recent progress and prospects in production and identification of umami peptides from marine proteins. Food Innovation and Advances 3(3): 256−267 doi: 10.48130/fia-0024-0024
    Hu D, Zheng Z, Liang B, Jin Y, Shi C, et al. 2024. Recent progress and prospects in production and identification of umami peptides from marine proteins. Food Innovation and Advances 3(3): 256−267 doi: 10.48130/fia-0024-0024

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return