Search
2025 Volume 5
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

A novel and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in citrus epicotyls and mature stem tissues

More Information
  • Received: 09 July 2024
    Revised: 23 August 2024
    Accepted: 28 August 2024
    Published online: 06 January 2025
    Fruit Research  5 Article number: e002 (2025)  |  Cite this article
  • Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression is a powerful technique for rapidly evaluating gene expression in higher plants. This study aimed to improve transient expression levels of T-DNA genes in citrus by investigating the effects of various factors, including seedling age, tissue treatments, Agrobacterium incubation medium and duration, hormone combinations, methylation inhibitors, antioxidants, and more. These parameters were optimized and tested, and significant increases in transient gene expression in juvenile epicotyls of Carrizo citrange and mature stem tissues of Pineapple sweet orange, Valencia orange, and Washington navel orange were observed. The present results demonstrated up to a six-fold increase in transient GUS gene expression, highlighting the effectiveness of these simple and inexpensive treatments. The juvenile and mature citrus explants used in this study displayed high levels of transient expression, which may provide a valuable tool for studying phloem-associated diseases such as Huanglongbing (HLB), facilitating rapid analysis of gene expression involved in Candidatus Liberibacter asiacticus (CLas) pathogenicity. This optimized method may also offer a promising tool for advancing genetic studies and improving the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transgene-free editing in citrus and other economically significant perennial crops.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Krenek P, Samajova O, Luptovciak I, Doskocilova A, Komis G, et al. 2015. Transient plant transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens: principles, methods and applications. Biotechnology Advances 33(6):1024−42

    doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.03.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Burnett MJB, Burnett AC. 2020. Therapeutic recombinant protein production in plants: challenges and opportunities. Plants, People, Planet 2(2):121−32

    doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10073

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Tanz SK, Castleden I, Small ID, Millar AH. 2013. Fluorescent protein tagging as a tool to define the subcellular distribution of proteins in plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 4:214

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2013.00214

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Tyurin AA, Suhorukova AV, Kabardaeva KV, Goldenkova-Pavlova IV. 2020. Transient gene expression is an effective experimental tool for the research into the fine mechanisms of plant gene function: advantages, limitations, and solutions. Plants 9(9):1187

    doi: 10.3390/plants9091187

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Zamani K. 2018. Transient gene expression in plants and its application in molecular farming and functional genomics. Crop Biotechnology 7:65−79

    Google Scholar

    [6]

    Philips JG, Dudley KJ, Waterhouse PM, Hellens RP. 2019. The rapid methylation of T-DNAs upon Agrobacterium inoculation in plant leaves. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:312

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Acanda Y, Welker S, Orbović V, Levy A. 2021. A simple and efficient agroinfiltration method for transient gene expression in Citrus. Plant Cell Reports 40(7):1171−79

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-021-02700-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Gong J, Tian Z, Qu X, Meng Q, Guan Y, et al. 2021. Illuminating the cells: transient transformation of citrus to study gene functions and organelle activities related to fruit quality. Horticulture Research 8(1):175

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-021-00611-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Gill K, Kumar P, Kumar A, Kapoor B, Sharma R, et al. 2022. Comprehensive mechanistic insights into the citrus genetics, breeding challenges, biotechnological implications, and omics-based interventions. Tree Genetics & Genomes 18(2):9

    doi: 10.1007/s11295-022-01544-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Karuppaiya P, Huang J, Zhang M. 2023. Devious phloem intruder Candidatus liberibacter species causing Huanglongbing: history, symptoms, mechanism, and current strategies. In Current and Emerging Challenges in the Diseases of Trees, ed. Bellé C. UK: IntechOpen. doi: 10.5772/intechopen.105089

    [11]

    Ma W, Pang Z, Huang X, Xu J, Pandey SS, et al. 2022. Citrus Huanglongbing is a pathogen-triggered immune disease that can be mitigated with antioxidants and gibberellin. Nature Communications 13(1):529

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28189-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Lee K, Wang K. 2023. Strategies for genotype-flexible plant transformation. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 79:102848

    doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2022.102848

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Altpeter F, Springer NM, Bartley LE, Blechl AE, Brutnell TP, et al. 2016. Advancing crop transformation in the era of genome editing. The Plant Cell 28(7):1510−20

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.16.00196

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Kausch AP, Nelson-Vasilchik K, Hague J, Mookkan M, Quemada H, et al. 2019. Edit at will: genotype independent plant transformation in the era of advanced genomics and genome editing. Plant Science 281:186−205

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.01.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Maren NA, Duan H, Da K, Yencho GC, Ranney TG, et al. 2022. Genotype-independent plant transformation. Horticulture Research 9:uhac047

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhac047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Ghorbel R, La-Malfa S, López MM, Petit A, Navarro L, et al. 2001. Additional copies of virG from pTiBo542 provide a super-transformation ability to Agrobacterium tumefaciens in citrus. Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology 58(3):103−10

    doi: 10.1006/pmpp.2000.0318

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wroblewski T, Tomczak A, Michelmore R. 2005. Optimization of Agrobacterium-mediated transient assays of gene expression in lettuce, tomato and Arabidopsis. Plant Biotechnology Journal 3(2):259−73

    doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2005.00123.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Wu HY, Liu KH, Wang YC, Wu JF, Chiu WL, et al. 2014. AGROBEST: an efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression method for versatile gene function analyses in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Methods 10(1):19

    doi: 10.1186/1746-4811-10-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Fujiuchi N, Matoba N, Matsuda R. 2016. Environment control to improve recombinant protein yields in plants based on Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology 4:23

    doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2016.00023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Goulin EH, Galdeano DM, Granato LM, Matsumura EE, Dalio RJD, et al. 2019. RNA interference and CRISPR: promising approaches to better understand and control citrus pathogens. Microbiological Research 226:1−9

    doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2019.03.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Ishii T, Araki M. 2016. Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing. Plant Cell Report 35(7):1507−18

    doi: 10.1007/s00299-016-1974-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Sandhya D, Jogam P, Allini VR, Abbagani S, Alok A. 2020. The present and potential future methods for delivering CRISPR/Cas9 components in plants. Journal of Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology 18(1):25

    doi: 10.1186/s43141-020-00036-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Nguyen TH, Ben Taieb S, Moritaka M, Ran L, Fukuda S. 2023. Public Acceptance of foods derived from genome editing technology: a review of the technical, social and regulatory aspects. Journal of International Food & Agribusiness Marketing 35(4):397−427

    doi: 10.1080/08974438.2021.2011526

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Woo JW, Kim J, Kwon SI, Corvalán C, Cho SW, et al. 2015. DNA-free genome editing in plants with preassembled CRISPR-Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Nature Biotechnology 33(11):1162−64

    doi: 10.1038/nbt.3389

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Chen L, Li W, Katin-Grazzini L, Ding J, Gu X, et al. 2018. A method for the production and expedient screening of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated non-transgenic mutant plants. Horticulture Research 5:13

    doi: 10.1038/s41438-018-0023-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Salonia F, Ciacciulli A, Poles L, Pappalardo HD, La Malfa S, et al. 2020. New plant breeding techniques in Citrus for the improvement of important agronomic traits. A Review. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:1234

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.01234

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Weeks DP. 2017. Gene editing in polyploid crops: wheat, camelina, canola, potato, cotton, peanut, sugar cane, and citrus. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science 149:65−80

    doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2017.05.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Min T, Hwarari D, Li D, Movahedi A, Yang L. 2022. CRISPR-based genome editing and its applications in woody plants. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 23(17):10175

    doi: 10.3390/ijms231710175

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Alquézar B, Bennici S, Carmona L, Gentile A, Peña L. 2022. Generation of transfer-DNA-free base-edited citrus plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:835282

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.835282

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Cervera M, Juárez J, Navarro L, Peña L. 2005. Genetic transformation of mature citrus plants. In Transgenic Plants: Methods and Protocols, ed. Peña L. US: Humana Press. Vol 286. pp. 177−87. doi: 10.1385/1-59259-827-7:177

    [31]

    Orbović V, Shankar A, Peeples ME, Hubbard C, Zale J. 2015. Citrus transformation using mature tissue explants. In Agrobacterium Protocols, ed. Wang K. New York, NY: Springer. Vol 1224. pp. 259–73. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-1658-0_21

    [32]

    Canton M, Wu H, Dutt M, Zale J. 2022. A new liquid selection system for mature citrus transformation. Scientia Horticulturae 293:110672

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2021.110672

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Pereira ALA, Carazzolle MF, Abe VY, de Oliveira MLP, Domingues MN, et al. 2014. Identification of putative TAL effector targets of the citrus canker pathogens shows functional convergence underlying disease development and defense response. BMC Genomics 15(1):157

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-157

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Lewis JD, Knoblauch M, Turgeon R. 2022. The phloem as an arena for plant pathogens. Annual Review of Phytopathology 60:77−96

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-020620-100946

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Wu H, Acanda Y, Shankar A, Peeples M, Hubbard C, et al. 2015. Genetic transformation of commercially important mature citrus scions. Crop Science 55(6):2786−97

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2015.01.0013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Béziat C, Kleine-Vehn J, Feraru E. 2017. Histochemical staining of β-glucuronidase and its spatial quantification. In Plant Hormones, eds Kleine-Vehn J, Sauer M. New York, NY: Humana Press. Vol 1497. pp. 73−80. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6469-7_8

    [37]

    Li Y, Tang D, Liu Z, Chen J, Cheng B, et al. 2022. An improved procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of 'Carrizo' citrange. Plants 11(11):1457

    doi: 10.3390/plants11111457

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Dutt M, Grosser JW. 2009. Evaluation of parameters affecting Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of citrus. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 98(3):331−40

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-009-9567-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Zhao H, Jia Y, Cao Y, Wang Y. 2020. Improving T-DNA transfer to Tamarix hispida by adding chemical compounds during Agrobacterium tumefaciens culture. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:501358

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.501358

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Xi J, Patel M, Dong S, Que Q, Qu R. 2018. Acetosyringone treatment duration affects large T-DNA molecule transfer to rice callus. BMC Biotechnology 18(1):48

    doi: 10.1186/s12896-018-0459-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Zhao Q, Du Y, Wang H, Rogers HJ, Yu C, et al. 2019. 5-Azacytidine promotes shoot regeneration during Agrobacterium-mediated soybean transformation. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 141:40−50

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2019.05.014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Dan Y, Armstrong CL, Dong J, Feng X, Fry JE, et al. 2009. Lipoic acid—an unique plant transformation enhancer. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 45(6):630−38

    doi: 10.1007/s11627-009-9227-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Dutt M, Vasconcellos M, Grosser JW. 2011. Effects of antioxidants on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation and accelerated production of transgenic plants of Mexican lime (Citrus aurantifolia Swingle). Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) 107(1):79−89

    doi: 10.1007/s11240-011-9959-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Hasan Nudin NF, van Kronenburg B, Tinnenbroek I, Krens F. 2015. The importance of salicylic acid and an improved plant condition in determining success in Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Acta Horticulturae 1087:65−69

    doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1087.7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Zhang Y, Ru Y, Shi Z, Wang H, Zhang J, et al. 2023. Effects of different light conditions on transient expression and biomass in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves. Open Life Science 18(1):20220732

    doi: 10.1515/biol-2022-0732

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Sassi M, Ruberti I, Vernoux T, Xu J. 2013. Shedding light on auxin movement: light-regulation of polar auxin transport in the photocontrol of plant development. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8(3):e23355

    doi: 10.4161/psb.23355

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Yokawa K, Koshiba T, Baluška F. 2014. Light-dependent control of redox balance and auxin biosynthesis in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior 9(6):e29522

    doi: 10.4161/psb.29522

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Lv B, Zhu J, Kong X, Ding Z. 2021. Light participates in the auxin-dependent regulation of plant growth. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 63(5):819−22

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13036

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Chen Z, Debernardi JM, Dubcovsky J, Gallavotti A. 2022. Recent advances in crop transformation technologies. Nature Plants 8(12):1343−51

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-022-01295-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Huang X, Jia H, Xu J, Wang Y, Wen J, et al. 2023. Transgene-free genome editing of vegetatively propagated and perennial plant species in the T0 generation via a co-editing strategy. Nature Plants 9(10):1591−97

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01520-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Jia H, Omar AA, Xu J, Dalmendray J, Wang Y, et al. 2024. Generation of transgene-free canker-resistant Citrus sinensis cv. Hamlin in the T0 generation through Cas12a/CBE co-editing. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1385768

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1385768

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Su H, Wang Y, Xu J, Omar AA, Grosser JW, et al. 2023. Generation of the transgene-free canker-resistant Citrus sinensis using Cas12a/crRNA ribonucleoprotein in the T0 generation. Nature Communications 14(1):3957

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39714-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Su H, Wang Y, Xu J, Omar AA, Grosser JW, et al. 2024. Cas12a RNP-mediated co-transformation enables transgene-free multiplex genome editing, long deletions, and inversions in citrus chromosome. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1448807

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1448807

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Villemont E, Dubois F, Sangwan RS, Vasseur G, Bourgeois Y, et al. 1997. Role of the host cell cycle in the Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation of Petunia: evidence of an S-phase control mechanism for T-DNA transfer. Planta 201(2):160−72

    doi: 10.1007/BF01007700

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Li Y, Sun M, Wang X, Zhang YJ, Da XW, et al. 2021. Effects of plant growth regulators on transient expression of foreign gene in Nicotiana benthamiana L. leaves. Bioresources and Bioprocessing 8(1):124

    doi: 10.1186/s40643-021-00480-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Gelvin SB. 2006. Agrobacterium virulence gene induction. In Agrobacterium Protocols, ed. Wang K. US: Humana Press. Vol 343. pp. 77–85. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-130-4:77

    [57]

    Bhattacharya A, Sood P, Citovsky V. 2010. The roles of plant phenolics in defence and communication during Agrobacterium and Rhizobium infection. Molecular Plant Pathology 11(5):705−19

    doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00625.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    El-Sappah AH, Yan K, Huang Q, Islam MM, Li Q, et al. 2021. Comprehensive mechanism of gene silencing and its role in plant growth and development. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:705249

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.705249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Sivanandhan G, Kapil Dev G, Theboral J, Selvaraj N, Ganapathi A, et al. 2015. Sonication, vacuum infiltration and thiol compounds enhance the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation frequency of Withania somnifera (L.) Dunal. PLoS One 10(4):e0124693

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124693

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Desta B, Amare G. 2021. Paclobutrazol as a plant growth regulator. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture 8:1

    doi: 10.1186/s40538-020-00199-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Soumya PR, Kumar P, Pal M. 2017. Paclobutrazol: a novel plant growth regulator and multi-stress ameliorant. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 22(3):267−78

    doi: 10.1007/s40502-017-0316-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Shalaby TA, Taha NA, Taher DI, Metwaly MM, El-Beltagi HS, et al. 2022. Paclobutrazol improves the quality of tomato seedlings to be resistant to Alternaria solani blight disease: biochemical and histological perspectives. Plants 11(3):425

    doi: 10.3390/plants11030425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Wang X, Traband R, Hiraoka Y, Ferrante SP, Yu L, et al. 2024. Revealing genetic determinants of photosynthesis-related traits in citrus via genome-wide association studies. Fruit Research 4:e020

    doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0013

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Sun H, Kalluri A, Tang D, Ding J, Zhai L, et al. 2024. Engineered dsRNA–protein nanoparticles for effective systemic gene silencing in plants. Horticulture Research 11:uhae045

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhae045

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Cui X, Zhang J, Liu Y, Luo X, Deng X, et al. 2022. Comparison of different grafting methods on the effect of 'Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus' transmission. Fruit Research 2:15

    doi: 10.48130/FruRes-2022-0015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Neves C, Ribeiro B, Amaro R, Expósito J, Grimplet J, et al. 2023. Network of GRAS transcription factors in plant development, fruit ripening and stress responses. Horticulture Research 10:uhad220

    doi: 10.1093/hr/uhad220

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Li Y, Hu W, Ganie SA, Liu Z, Cheng B, et al. 2025. A novel and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in citrus epicotyls and mature stem tissues. Fruit Research 5: e002 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0035
    Li Y, Hu W, Ganie SA, Liu Z, Cheng B, et al. 2025. A novel and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in citrus epicotyls and mature stem tissues. Fruit Research 5: e002 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0035

Figures(7)

Article Metrics

Article views(42) PDF downloads(6)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

A novel and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in citrus epicotyls and mature stem tissues

Fruit Research  5 Article number: e002  (2025)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression is a powerful technique for rapidly evaluating gene expression in higher plants. This study aimed to improve transient expression levels of T-DNA genes in citrus by investigating the effects of various factors, including seedling age, tissue treatments, Agrobacterium incubation medium and duration, hormone combinations, methylation inhibitors, antioxidants, and more. These parameters were optimized and tested, and significant increases in transient gene expression in juvenile epicotyls of Carrizo citrange and mature stem tissues of Pineapple sweet orange, Valencia orange, and Washington navel orange were observed. The present results demonstrated up to a six-fold increase in transient GUS gene expression, highlighting the effectiveness of these simple and inexpensive treatments. The juvenile and mature citrus explants used in this study displayed high levels of transient expression, which may provide a valuable tool for studying phloem-associated diseases such as Huanglongbing (HLB), facilitating rapid analysis of gene expression involved in Candidatus Liberibacter asiacticus (CLas) pathogenicity. This optimized method may also offer a promising tool for advancing genetic studies and improving the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transgene-free editing in citrus and other economically significant perennial crops.

    • Transient gene expression is a powerful and versatile method for quickly assessing gene expression in higher plants. This technique, particularly when mediated by Agrobacterium, involves the transcription of non-integrated T-DNA genes within plant cells[1], and it has been widely applied in various fields including the production of recombinant protein, subcellular protein localization, protein-gene interaction studies, functional genomics, and epigenetic regulation assays[26]. In citrus, leaf tissues have been the preferred choice for Agrobacterium infiltration due to their ease of handling and high transformation efficiency[7]. However, other tissues, including citrus fruits[8], and phloem-enriched organs such as immature and mature shoots are increasingly being used for specialized applications[9].

      One critical application of Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in citrus is the study of Huanglongbing (HLB), a devastating bacterial disease that targets the phloem of citrus plants. HLB, as a result of Candidatus Liberibacter asiacticus (CLas) infection causes the accumulation of callose in phloem sieve plates, impairing the transport of photosynthetic products and leading to widespread cellular damage[10]. Research has shown that CLas infection triggers the upregulation of genes associated with ROS production and the downregulation of antioxidant enzymes in the phloem, resulting in the systemic death of phloem cells[11]. Therefore, developing an efficient transient gene expression system using phloem-enriched tissues, such as epicotyls and shoots, is crucial for studying the genetic responses to CLas and other phloem-related phenomena.

      The efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression is influenced by several factors, including the strain of Agrobacterium used and the physiological condition of the plant tissues[12]. Additionally, the composition of the culture media for both Agrobacterium and the plant tissues plays a significant role in determining the success of transient gene expression, as evidenced in various plant species[1315]. Numerous strategies have been developed to enhance Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression, such as optimizing culture conditions and refining the vectors for gene delivery[7,1619].

      The recent advancements in CRISPR/Cas9 and other gene editing technologies have revolutionized the genetic improvement of citrus[20]. Unlike traditional transgenics, gene-edited citrus plants are anticipated to be more acceptable to the public and may face fewer regulatory obstacles, provided they do not contain foreign DNA[2123]. One method to achieve non-transgenic gene editing is through the delivery of pre-assembled Cas9-gRNA complexes into protoplasts, a technique that has shown promise in various plant species including Arabidopsis, tobacco, lettuce, and rice[24]. However, producing non-transgenic, gene-edited citrus plants remains challenging. Our previous study using Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression demonstrated the potential for creating non-transgenic, gene-edited tobacco plants with high efficiency[25]. Yet, applying this technique to citrus has proven less effective (unpublished data). Therefore, optimizing the transient expression of Cas9 and gRNAs is essential for improving the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated gene editing in citrus.

      Epicotyls are particularly advantageous for gene editing in citrus due to their high susceptibility to Agrobacterium infection and their capacity for effective shoot regeneration[9,26]. Several research initiatives have successfully employed Agrobacterium-mediated stable expression of Cas9 and gRNA in epicotyl explants to generate gene-edited citrus plants[9,27,28]. Recent work by Alquézar et al. has demonstrated a novel approach for editing the citrus acetolactate synthase (ALS) gene using Agrobacterium-infected epicotyl tissues without the need for antibiotic selection[29]. Additionally, mature citrus stem tissues provide an alternative explant for gene editing, allowing for the evaluation of fruit without the extended juvenile period typical of citrus[3032]. However, the efficiency of Agrobacterium infection and subsequent shoot regeneration remains a limiting factor when using mature stem tissues.

      In this manuscript, an optimized method for utilizing epicotyl tissues of juvenile seedlings and stem tissues of mature citrus as explants for Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression is described. By refining various factors, particularly the compositions of the culture media used for Agrobacterium and explant culture, as well as for Agrobacterium-explant co-cultivation, up to a 6-fold increase in transient gene expression activities was achieved in the epicotyls of juvenile Carrizo citrange seedlings and stem segments of mature Pineapple sweet orange, Valencia orange, and Washington navel orange trees. This enhanced epicotyl- and mature stem-based transient gene expression system offers significant potential for producing transgene-free, gene-edited citrus plants and for advancing our understanding of genes involved in CLas-plant interactions[33,34].

    • Epicotyl tissues used in this study were sourced from Carrizo citrange seedlings [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck × Poncirus trifoliata (L.) Raf.]. Seeds were purchased from Tree Source Citrus Nursery (504 N Kaweah Ave, Exeter, CA 93221, USA). Seeds were manually de-coated and then surface-sterilized by treating with 75% ethanol for 60 s, followed by a 20-min soak in 1% sodium hypochlorite, and finally rinsing 4 times with sterile distilled water. Subsequently, internal seed coats were removed, and the seeds were germinated on Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 30 g/L sucrose and 7 g/L agar at pH 5.8. The seeds were kept at 28 °C under various light/dark conditions depending on the specific experimental treatments. Etiolated seedlings were grown in the dark for varying periods, ranging from 3 to 4 weeks. In contrast, light-grown seedlings were initially germinated in the dark for 3 weeks and then transferred to a 16/8-h light-dark cycle with a photon flux density (PPFD) of 60 μmol/m²/s for 1 week or until the etiolated seedlings turned green. To investigate the effect of hormone treatments on transient gene expression, 1-cm-long epicotyl segments were incubated in a liquid MS medium containing 3 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.1 mg/L NAA at pH 5.8 for periods of 0, 3, 6, or 9 h before Agrobacterium infection.

      Somatic stem tissues were obtained from young growing shoots of newly grafted Pineapple sweet orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck], Valencia orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck], and Washington Navel orange [Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck] trees. These trees were propagated in a greenhouse (maintained at 18−27 °C) by grafting buds from adult mother trees onto 1-year-old sour orange rootstocks, which were grown for approximately 5 months before transformation. The newly growing shoots, approximately 20 cm in length, were harvested, and leaves and thorns were removed. The bud sticks were disinfected by immersion in 1 M HCl for 30 s, followed by treatment with a 20% (v/v) commercial bleach solution containing 0.2% (v/v) Tween 20 for 30 min[30,35]. The bud sticks were then rinsed 5 times with sterile distilled water, and the internodal stems were cut into thin segments for Agrobacterium infection.

    • Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain EHA105, carrying the binary vector pCambia1305.1 with the 35S::GUS fusion gene, was used to evaluate transient gene expression. The Agrobacterium stock was streaked on a solid LB medium plate containing 100 mg/L kanamycin and 50 mg/L rifampicin and cultured at 28 °C for 2 d. Single colonies were transferred to 5 mL of liquid LB medium supplemented with 100 mg/L kanamycin and 50 mg/L rifampicin and cultured at 28 °C with shaking at 200 rpm for 24 h. The 5 mL of cultured bacterial solution was then transferred into 50 mL of liquid LB medium containing the same antibiotics and cultured under the same conditions until the OD600 reached 0.6. Agrobacterium cells were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 15 min and resuspended in a liquid co-cultivation medium comprising MS medium, 30 g/L sucrose, and 20 mg/L acetosyringone (AS), unless otherwise stated.

      The effects of AS, different media compositions, and Agrobacterium cells pretreatment incubation times on transient expression were evaluated. Specifically, 20 mg/L AS was added to the LB medium, and Agrobacterium cells were pre-incubated in media containing MS,1/10 MS, ½ MS & ½ AB, and AB for 3, 6, and 9 h before infection, respectively.

    • On the day of Agrobacterium infection, juvenile Carrizo citrange epicotyl seedlings were cut into 1 cm segments under sterile conditions and incubated in the Agrobacterium suspension as described by Orbović et al.[31]. The explants were then blotted dry on sterilized filter paper and arranged end-to-end in Petri dishes containing co-cultivation medium (MS medium, 3 mg/L 6-BA, 30 g/L sucrose, and 20 mg/L AS) and incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 3 d unless otherwise specified. For the mature citrus cultivars, stem segments from the first flushes of grafted citrus plants were used. The mature tissue explants were prepared similarly, with thin segments incubated in the Agrobacterium suspension, blotted dry on sterilized filter paper, and placed in Petri dishes with co-cultivation medium (MS basal medium, 2 mg/L 2,4-D, 2 mg/L IAA, 1 mg/L 2-iP, 30 g/L sucrose, and 20 mg/L AS) and incubated in the dark at 25 °C for 3 d unless otherwise specified.

      To identify the optimal co-cultivation duration for maximum transient expression, explants were kept on co-cultivation medium for 2 to 6 d before being transferred to shoot regeneration medium supplemented with 150 mg/L timentin and 20 mg/L hygromycin. They were then cultured under light conditions (60 μmol/m2/s) with a 16-h photoperiod at 26 ± 2 °C for 5 d.

      For citrus shoot regeneration, juvenile citrus explants were transferred to a shoot regeneration medium containing MS, 3 mg/L 6-BA, 30 g/L sucrose, and 8 g/L agar and cultured under light conditions (60 μmol/m²/s) with a 16-h photoperiod at 26 ± 2 °C, and they were subcultured onto fresh media every 3 weeks.

    • The effect of chemical treatments on transient expression was assessed using media containing various concentrations of sulfamethazine (SMZ) (10 μM, 30 μM, and 50 μM), lipoic acid (LA) (5 μM, 10 μM, and 20 μM), and paclobutrazol (PBZ) (10 μM, 30 μM, and 50 μM), either alone or in combinations, in the co-cultivation media. The incubation treatment lasted for 3 d.

    • The Agrobacterium-infected tissues were stained with a solution containing 100 mM potassium phosphate buffer, 10 mM Na2EDTA, 0.5 mM K3Fe(CN)6, 0.5 mM K4Fe(CN)6, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1 g/L X-gluc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid) at 37 °C for 12 h. The stained tissues were then sequentially destained in 95% and 70% ethanol until chlorophylls were removed or the tissues became clear. Light microscopy images of the stained tissues were analyzed using ImageJ software to quantify the blue staining intensity (stained area multiplied by color intensity) of each explant[36]. A total of 200 explants were analyzed per treatment.

    • SPSS software was employed for statistical analysis. The results are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of at least three replicate measurements. To assess significant differences, one-way ANOVA was used. For multiple comparisons, LSD was applied to compare significant differences (p < 0.05) among the different treatments.

    • Agrobacterium cells harboring a Ti-plasmid with a 35S::GUS gene were used to infect the epicotyls of Carrizo citrange, and the infected tissues were histochemically stained for GUS activity. Figure 1a shows that GUS expression appeared as early as the second day post-infection (dpi) in the inoculated epicotyl explants and peaked between 3 dpi and 4 dpi, and gradually declining thereafter. When the infected tissues were transferred to a selection medium for an additional 5 d, GUS expression drastically decreased (Fig. 1b). This expression pattern supports transient GUS expression in the infected tissues at an early stage. However, GUS activity was still observed in tissues on day 11 (6 + 5) (Fig. 1b), although much reduced than on day 3 (Fig. 1a), suggesting that these GUS spots are a result of stably integrated T-DNAs. Therefore, transient GUS expression peaks on the 3rd day after co-cultivation, and the subsequent experiments will be conducted over a 3-d incubation period.

      Figure 1. 

      Agrobacterium-mediated transient GUS expression in the citrus epicotyl explants. (a) Histochemical staining of GUS activity in dark-grown citrus epicotyl explants at 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 d post Agrobacterium infection (dpi). The blue color indicates the transient and stable expression of the GUS reporter gene. (b) The explants infected with Agrobacterium in the same way as in (a) were transferred to a selection medium containing timentin and hygromycin for an additional 5 d. The differences in GUS activity (blue color) between (a) and (b) are indicative of Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of the GUS gene.

    • The effect of growth conditions and seedling age on transient gene expression were next investigated. As shown in Fig. 2a, the dark-grown seedling tissues (two epicotyl explants on the right) exhibited significantly higher transient expression activity compared to the light-grown seedling tissues (2 epicotyl explants on the left). This observation was further confirmed by the quantitative analysis of GUS activities (Fig. 2b). The efficiency of stable transgenic plant production was also assessed using light-grown and etiolated seedlings as explants (Fig. 2c & d) and observed no significant differences between these explants. Additionally, the effect of seedling age on transient GUS expression was examined. Among the 5 stages analyzed (Fig. 2e), 4-week-old and 5-week-old seedlings showed significantly higher levels of GUS expression, whereas 7-week-old seedlings exhibited the lowest levels. In subsequent experiments, 4-week-old etiolated seedlings were used to investigate additional factors influencing transient expression of T-DNA genes.

      Figure 2. 

      Effects of growth conditions and seedling age on transient GUS expression. (a) Differential GUS expression in the infected 4-week-old etiolated (two epicotyl explants on the right) and light-grown (two epicotyl explants on the left) tissues. (b) Quantitative analysis of GUS activity in the infected 4-week-old etiolated and light-grown tissues. (c) Transgenic shoot regeneration from the infected etiolated (right panel) and light-grown (left panel) epicotyl explants. (d) Transgenic shoot regeneration efficiency of the infected etiolated and light-grown tissues. (e) Effects of seedling age on GUS gene expression. (f) Effects of duration of hormone treatments of explants on transient GUS expression. The explants were treated in a medium containing 3 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.1 mg/L NAA for 0, 1, 3, 6, and 9 h prior to Agrobacterium infection, respectively. Data were averaged from three independent transformation replicates, with ± SD. Significance among treatments is indicated by different lowercase letters (p < 0.05, ANOVA/LSD).

    • Our earlier study demonstrated that pre-treatment of epicotyl explants with 6-BA, 2,4-D, and NAA enhanced stable transformation efficiency[37]. To determine if the same treatment could also promote transient gene expression, 4-week-old etiolated explants were pre-incubated with a medium containing MS, 3 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.1 mg/L NAA[37,38] for 0, 1, 3, 6, and 9 h before infection with Agrobacterium. Figure 2f shows that GUS expression increased with incubation time and peaked between 3 and 6 h before declining. This suggests that hormone treatments of etiolated explants with 3 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.1 mg/L NAA for no more than 6 h can enhance Agrobacterium-mediated transient expression of T-DNA genes in citrus epicotyl tissues.

    • Acetosyringone (AS) has been widely documented to enhance transient expression and stable transformation in various plants[39,40]. To test whether AS could also enhance GUS transient expression in citrus epicotyl tissues, 20 mg/L AS was added to Agrobacterium-growing LB medium and incubated for 8 h before infection of the epicotyl tissues. Figure 3a shows that GUS expression remains invariant between treatments with or without AS, suggesting that AS in LB medium barely affects GUS expression. Given that the maximal induction of expression of vir genes occurs at acid pH 5.2−6.0, pH 7.0 in LB medium could explain why AS fails to stimulate GUS expression in the infected epicotyl tissues. To address this, Agrobacterium cells were resuspended and incubated in various AS-containing basal media with pH 5.8 for 3 h before infection, including MS medium, 1/10 MS, ½ MS & ½ AB (Agrobacterium minimal medium) medium, and AB medium. Parallel to this, the Agrobacterium cells are resuspended in the liquid medium containing MS, 30 g/L sucrose, and 20 mg/L AS. This treatment was used as a control in both experiments presented in Fig. 3b. The highest transient GUS expression was observed in 1/10 MS medium containing AS (Fig. 3b), indicating that this treatment significantly increases GUS expression. It was subsequently tested whether the incubation time of Agrobacterium cells in AS-containing 1/10 MS medium affected transient GUS expression. Figure 3c shows that GUS expression increased gradually with increasing incubation time and reached its highest level at 6 h before declining rapidly, suggesting that incubation for 6 h is optimal for transient GUS expression.

      Figure 3. 

      Effects of components of Agrobacterium cells with acetosyringone (AS) and MS media on Agrobacterium-mediated transient GUS expression. (a) Addition of 20 mg/L AS to the Agrobacterium culture medium, LB medium (pH 7.0). (b) Effects of MS media and Agrobacterium basal (AB) medium on transient GUS gene expression. The duration of the pretreatments of Agrobacterium cells was 3 h. The control was with no pretreatments. (c) Effect of incubation time of Agrobacterium cells in 1/10 MS medium on transient GUS expression. In all experiments, the transient GUS expression activities in the controls were normalized to 1. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05, ANOVA/LSD).

    • Since 3 chemicals, including sulfamethazine (SMZ)[41], lipoic acid (LA)[42,43], and paclobutrazol (PBZ)[37,44] display a promoting effect on stable transformation in various plants, the effects of 3 compounds added to incubation media on transient GUS expression in citrus seedlings were examined. Experiments were conducted using 4-week-old etiolated seedling explants treated with 3 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.1 mg/L NAA for 3 h before infection. Agrobacterium cells were resuspended in 1/10 MS medium (pH 5.8) containing 20 mg/L AS and incubated for 6 h before use for infection. The same medium was used for all treatments. Treatment with no added chemicals in the co-cultivation medium was used as a control. It was found that 30 μM SMZ (Fig. 4a), 10 μM LA (Fig. 4b), and 30 μM PBZ (Fig. 4c) were the most effective, resulting in a significant increase in GUS expression, respectively. The combination of any two of these chemicals further increased transient GUS expression, but the combination of all three did not yield a greater increase than any two of the three combined (Fig. 4d). As each chemical functions differently and is inexpensive, a combined use may have synergistic effects on other plant species. We therefore chose to apply all three chemicals to maximize transient expression.

      Figure 4. 

      Effects of chemical treatments added to the co-cultivation media on transient GUS expression. (a) Transient GUS expression in response to sulfamethazine (SMZ). (b) Transient GUS expression in response to lipoic acid (LA). (c) Transient GUS expression in response to paclobutrazol (PBZ). (d) Combined effects of the three chemicals in the co-cultivation medium on transient GUS expression. Experiments were conducted using 4-week-old etiolated seedling explants treated with 3 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.1 mg/L NAA for 3 h before infection. Agrobacterium cells were resuspended in 1/10 MS medium (pH 5.8) containing 20 mg/L AS and incubated for 6 h prior to use for infection. Transient GUS expression activity, with no added chemicals in the co-cultivation medium, was normalized to 1. + indicates inclusion of the chemical, while − indicates exclusion. The combination of two of the chemicals (SMZ, LA, and PBZ) can enhance transient GUS expression activity similarly to the effects of all three combined. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05, ANOVA/LSD).

    • The optimized factors were then combined sequentially and evaluated their synergistic effects on the enhancement of transient GUS expression evaluated. Figure 5 shows that when 4-week-old etiolated explants were combined with the Agrobacterium cell treatment, GUS expression was significantly enhanced. This was further increased by adding the chemical compounds SMZ, LA, and PBZ to the incubation medium, resulting in a five-fold increase in GUS activity in juvenile Carrizo citranges compared to the control, where experiments were conducted using light-grown seedling explants to infect Agrobacterium without any pre-treatments, nor any chemicals in the co-cultivation medium.

      Figure 5. 

      Combined effects of treatments for Agrobacterium and explants on Agrobacterium-mediated transient GUS expression in citrus epicotyl segments. Expression levels for all other treatments are presented as fold changes compared to the control group. Transient GUS expression activity in the control group (no treatments) was normalized to 1. + or − indicate the inclusion or exclusion of these treatments, respectively. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05, ANOVA/LSD).

    • To determine whether these treatments, which enhanced transient expression of the GUS expression in juvenile epicotyl tissues could also enhance transient expression in mature shoot tissues, four combinations of previous treatments were tested using mature stem explants of Pineapple sweet orange, Valencia orange, and Washington navel orange. The control refers to the Agrobacterium-mediated mature citrus transformation method described by Orbović et al.[31]. This method utilizes 6-month-old newly developed stem explants from grafted mature buds that are immediately infected with Agrobacterium cells resuspended in an infection medium (pH 5.8) containing MS, 100 mg/L myo-inositol, 10 mg/L thiamine-HCl, 10 mg/L pyridoxine-HCl, 1 mg/L nicotinic acid, 2 mg/L glycine, and 30 g/L sucrose. Transient GUS expression activity in the control was normalized to 1. Figure 6 shows that treatments of Agrobacterium and explants plus any one of the three chemicals increased GUS expression, with a four-fold increase in Pineapple sweet orange (Fig. 6a), a five-fold increase in Valencia orange (Fig. 6b), and a six-fold increase in Washington navel orange (Fig. 6c). However, unlike juvenile epicotyl explants, the combined use of these three chemicals did not result in further increases in GUS expression compared to individual chemical treatments, although each chemical individually enhanced transient GUS gene expression (Fig. 6ac). Otherwise, similar enhancements were observed in the mature citrus stem tissues.

      Figure 6. 

      Combined effects of pretreatments of Agrobacterium and explants on Agrobacterium-mediated transient GUS expression in mature citrus stem tissues. Histochemical staining and quantitative analysis of GUS activities were performed on various treatments in (a) Pineapple sweat orange, (b) Valencia orange, and (c) Washington navel orange. Explant treatment, 6-month-old newly grafted mature stem explants were soaked in a hormone-rich medium containing 3 mg/L 6-BA, 1 mg/L 2,4-D, and 0.1 mg/L NAA for 3 h before infection. Agrobacterium cell treatment, Agrobacterium cells were resuspended in a medium (pH 5.8) containing 1/10 MS and 20 mg/L AS and cultured for additional 6 h before infection. The control refers to the Agrobacterium-mediated mature citrus transformation method described by Orbović et al.[31]. This method utilizes 6-month-old newly developed stem explants from grafted mature buds that are immediately infected with Agrobacterium cells resuspended in an infection medium (pH 5.8) containing MS, 100 mg/L myo-inositol, 10 mg/L thiamine-HCl, 10 mg/L pyridoxine-HCl, 1 mg/L nicotinic acid, 2 mg/L glycine, and 30 g/L sucrose. Transient GUS expression activity in the control was normalized to 1. Different lowecase letters indicate significant differences among different treatments (p < 0.05, ANOVA/LSD).

    • In this study, treatments of Agrobacterium cells and citrus explants before the Agrobacterium and explant co-cultivation, and incorporation of SMZ, LA, and PBZ in the co-cultivation on the Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression have been investigated. It has been shown that the combination of these optimized treatments can drastically improve the transient GUS expression in both juvenile epicotyl tissues of Carrizo citrange and mature stem tissues of Pineapple sweet orange, Valencia orange, and Washington navel orange, which will be of significant implication for the improvement of gene editing efficiency in citrus plants. A schematic diagram of these treatments and infection procedure is presented in Fig. 7.

      Figure 7. 

      A summary of the procedure for enhancing Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression for both juvenile epicotyl and mature stem tissues of citrus described in this manuscript. The treatments described within the red boxes were incorporated into a conventional procedure for Agrobacterium-mediated infection of both juvenile and mature tissues. The procedure includes treatment of citrus explants and Agrobacterium cells prior to the Agrobacterium-explant co-cultivation, and inclusion of SMZ, LA, and PBZ in co-cultivation medium.

      Krenek et al. have demonstrated that developmental stage and the physiological state of plant tissues plays a significant role in T-DNA transfer, integration, and transformation efficiency[1]. The present observations support that these factors also influence the Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression activities in citrus tissues. The data show that explants from 4 to 5 week-old seedlings exhibit the highest levels of transient GUS activity compared to other stages of seedlings. Also, the results support that explants from the juvenile seedlings grown in the dark exhibits higher levels of transient gene expression activity when compared to those grown under light conditions, consistent with the results reported by Zhang et al.[45]. Light plays a crucial role in regulating auxin biosynthesis and transport[46,47]. When compared with seedlings grown under light, increased auxin levels in the etiolated seedlings[48] that have been grown in darkness may contribute to higher levels of transient GUS expression observed in the present study.

      The efficiency of transgene-free genome editing using Agrobacterium to deliver Cas9 and gRNA largely depends on the transient expression levels of these genes within the T-DNA[25]. Various efforts have been made to improve the stable transformation efficiencies in higher plants[12,49], but relatively little has been done to enhance the transient expression of T-DNA genes. Although several reports have documented the successful production of transgene-free gene-edited citrus plants[5053], further improvements in the efficiency of transgene-free gene editing in citrus are highly desirable. The present method, which improves the transient expression of T-DNA genes, may therefore be useful for enhancing the efficiency of transgene-free gene editing in citrus and likely in other perennial crops when Agrobacterium cells are used as a delivery vehicle for DNA encoding the Cas9 gene and gRNAs.

      The mechanisms by which treating explant tissues with the cytokinin 6-BA and the auxins 2,4-D and NAA before Agrobacterium infection enhances transient gene expression are not clear. It is also interesting to observe that treatment for 6 h or less can increase transient GUS expression, but treatment longer than 6 h does not have the same effect. Similar effects of enhancing transient gene expression by plant hormones have been demonstrated in other plant species previously[54,55].

      AS induces expression of vir genes, which are critical for T-DNA transfer into the plant cell nucleus[56,57]. Treating Agrobacterium cells with AS at an appropriate pH and low MS salt concentrations before the plant infection has been shown to increase transient GUS expression[40,56]. T-DNA transfer from the Ti plasmid in Agrobacterium into plant cells is a coordinated action of various vir genes. These vir genes are up-regulated by AS during infection, and AS has therefore been routinely used in plant transformation. In the present study, it was observed that Agrobacterium treated with AS for 6 h before being used for plant infection enhances transient expression of GUS gene in the T-DNA.

      One of the significant findings of this study is that all three compounds, SMZ, LA, and PBZ, can enhance transient gene expression in citrus tissues. It has been reported that gene promoters within T-DNA undergo de novo methylation upon Agroinfiltration in leaf tissues[6], which is associated with transcriptional repression or silencing[58] and decreases transgene transient expression[42]. But adding azacitidine (5-AzaC), a methylation inhibitor, to the incubation medium enhanced transient expression[39]. Consistent with earlier findings, adding SMZ, another methylation inhibitor, to the incubation medium also led to an increase in transient GUS expression in both epicotyl and stem tissues (Fig. 5; Fig. 6ac). This finding again may underscore the importance of demethylation in T-DNAs in promoting transient expression.

      Agrobacterium infection often elicits a host defense response, which brings about the generation of excessive harmful reactive oxygen species (ROS)[59], and the addition of antioxidants to incubation mediums often alleviate such response, resulting in the improvement of transient expression efficiency[39]. LA is also an antioxidant and widely used for the enhancement of stable transformation in soybean, tomatoes, wheat, and cotton plants[42,43]. Thus, applying LA to incubation medium likely helps to scavenge excessive ROS accumulated in Agrobacterium-infected plant cells. This mechanism may account for why LA increases transient GUS expression in citrus tissues.

      The observation that PBZ increases transient GUS expression in the present case is consistent with that where PBZ promotes stable transformation in Petunia hybrid[44], and citrus[37]. PBZ is an inhibitor of GA biosynthesis[60] but also implicated as a multi-stress ameliorant[61,62]. PBZ may be involved in the mitigation of adverse stress in infected citrus explants and that leads to the improvement of transient gene expression. It was demonstrated that a combination of any two of the three compounds significantly increases transient GUS expression, indicating a positive synergistic interaction.

      It is noteworthy that transient GUS expression is highly specific to cambium cells, even under constitutive CaMV35S promoter control. A cambium layer consists of differentiated meristematic cells that produce undifferentiated wood cells inward and phloem/bark cells outward. Due to their active cellular, physiological, and transcriptional activity, it is not difficult to understand why cambium cells express high levels of GUS in epicotyl and stem tissues. The cells derived from the cambium cells, however, become highly differentiated and lose their meristematic characteristics. It may explain why they lose GUS expression activity regardless of how strong or weak the promoter driving the GUS gene is.

      The vascular tissue-specific transient expression in citrus tissues might be significant for studies related to CLas, a phloem-colonizing bacteria that has devastated the citrus industry worldwide in recent decades[10,63]. The Agrobacterium mediated-transient expression system reported here along with a nanoparticle-mediated transient silencing of endogenous genes[64] (Li lab unpublished data) could be valuable for the rapid analysis of genes involved in CLas pathogenicity, as well as developmental and growth functions under various conditions, including within graft union regions[65,66].

    • In conclusion, a highly efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression method has been developed for both juvenile and mature citrus tissues. This method provides an alternative transient gene expression system for citrus and may also significantly improve the efficiency of Agrobacterium-mediated transgene-free genome editing in citrus and other perennial plant species.

      • The Citrus Research and Development Foundation (CRDF), USDA Crop Research Initiative Citrus Disease Research and Education (CDRE) and the University of Connecticut. We are grateful to Storrs Agricultural Experiment Station.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Li Y, Li YJ; data collection: Li YJ, Hu W, Ganie SA, Cheng B; analysis and interpretation of results: Li YJ, Li Y, Liu Z, Duan H; draft manuscript preparation: Li YJ, Li Y, Liu Z. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2025 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (7)  References (66)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Li Y, Hu W, Ganie SA, Liu Z, Cheng B, et al. 2025. A novel and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in citrus epicotyls and mature stem tissues. Fruit Research 5: e002 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0035
    Li Y, Hu W, Ganie SA, Liu Z, Cheng B, et al. 2025. A novel and efficient Agrobacterium-mediated transient gene expression in citrus epicotyls and mature stem tissues. Fruit Research 5: e002 doi: 10.48130/frures-0024-0035

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return