Search
2026 Volume 11
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Additions to saprobic Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China

  • Authors contributed equally: Saowaluck Tibpromma, Subashini C. Jayasiri

More Information
  • Received: 23 October 2024
    Revised: 23 April 2026
    Accepted: 12 May 2026
    Published online: 09 September 2026
    Studies in Fungi  11,  Article number: e024 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Our efforts to investigate microfungi in the Kunming Institute of Botany (KIB) garden have led to the discovery of several fungi on dead plant parts. Through comprehensive morphological studies, illustrations, and combined multi-locus phylogenies, we identified nine taxa from our collections, all belonging to the classes Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes. In particular, we introduce seven new host records and two new species, each with unique characteristics. The discovery of these new species, Melanographium trachycarpi and Neohendersonia camelliae, greatly enhances our understanding of fungal diversity and paves the way for further research. Meanwhile, Botryosphaeria dolichospermatii and Pseudolachnella tengii are reported here for the first time in their sexual form, which has the potential to further expand our knowledge. Additionally, a checklist of fungi collected from KIB between 2010 and 2025 is included for maintenance and institutional record-keeping, for those interested in fungi at KIB.
  • 加载中
  • [1] Cheek M, Nic Lughadha E, Kirk P, Lindon H, Carretero J, et al. 2020. New scientific discoveries: plants and fungi. Plants, People, Planet 2(5):371−388 doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10148

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Hyde K, Noorabadi MT, Thiyagaraja V, He MQ, Johnston P, et al. 2024. The 2024 outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 15(1):5146−6239 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/25

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3] Asfa F, Thambugala KM, Daranagama DA, de Silva NI, Liyanage KK, et al. 2025. New records of Neopestalotiopsis species associated with leaves of Annona muricata (Soursop) and Garcinia mangostana (Mangosteen) in the Western Province, Sri Lanka, and in vitro evaluation of selected biocontrol agents for their growth suppression. Studies in Fungi 10:e010 doi: 10.48130/sif-0025-0010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Kumar V, Cheewangkoon R, Gentekaki E, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Brahmanage RS, et al. 2019. Neopestalotiopsis alpapicalis sp. nov. a new endophyte from tropical mangrove trees in Krabi Province (Thailand). Phytotaxa 393(3):251−262 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.393.3.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Suwannarach N, Khuna S, Thitla T, Senwanna C, Nuangmek W, et al. 2024. Morpho-phylogenetic identification and characterization of new causal agents of Fusarium species for postharvest fruit rot disease of muskmelon in northern Thailand and their sensitivity to fungicides. Frontiers in Plant Science 15:1459759 doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1459759

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Kaewchai S, Soytong, Hyde KD. 2009. Mycofungicides and fungal biofertilizers. Fungal Diversity 38:25−50

    Google Scholar

    [7] Hyde KD, Tennakoon DS, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Maharachchikumbura SSN, et al. 2019. Fungal diversity notes 1036–1150: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 96:1−242 doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00429-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8] Hyde KD, Jones EBG, Liu JK, Ariyawansa H, Boehm E, et al. 2013. Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 63(1):1−313 doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0263-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9] Hongsanan S, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, McKenzie EHC, et al. 2020. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: orders and families incertae sedis in Dothideomycetes. Fungal Diversity 105(1):17−318 doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00462-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10] Pem D, Jeewon R, Chethana KWT, Hongsanan S, Doilom M, et al. 2021. Species concepts of Dothideomycetes: classification, phylogenetic inconsistencies and taxonomic standardization. Fungal Diversity 109(6):283−319 doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00485-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11] Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Gareth Jones EB, McKenzie EHC, Bhat JD, et al. 2016. Families of Sordariomycetes. Fungal Diversity 79(1):369 doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0369-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12] Gautam AK, Verma RK, Avasthi S, Bohra Y, Devadatha B, et al. 2022. Current insight into traditional and modern methods in fungal diversity estimates. Journal of Fungi 8(3):226 doi: 10.3390/jof8030226

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13] Thiyagaraja V, Hyde KD, Piepenbring M, Davydov EA, Dai DQ, et al. 2025. Orders of Ascomycota. Mycosphere 16(1):536−1411 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Crowther TW, Todd-Brown KE, Rowe CW, Wieder WR, Carey JC, et al. 2016. Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature 540(7631):104−108 doi: 10.1038/nature20150

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15] Peay KG, Kennedy PG, Talbot JM. 2016. Dimensions of biodiversity in the Earth mycobiome. Nature Reviews Microbiology 14:434−447 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.59

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Högberg P, Plamboeck AH, Taylor AF, Fransson PM. 1999. Natural 13C abundance reveals trophic status of fungi and host-origin of carbon in mycorrhizal fungi in mixed forests. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(15):8534−8539 doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.15.8534

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Větrovský T, Morais D, Kohout P, Lepinay C, Algora C, et al. 2020. GlobalFungi, a global database of fungal occurrences from high-throughput-sequencing metabarcoding studies. Scientific Data 7:228 doi: 10.1038/s41597-020-0567-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Lofgren LA, Stajich JE. 2021. Fungal biodiversity and conservation mycology in light of new technology, big data, and changing attitudes. Current Biology 31(19):R1312−R1325 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.06.083

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19] Hyde KD, Baldrian P, Chen Y, Thilini Chethana KW, De Hoog S, et al. 2024. Current trends, limitations and future research in the fungi? Fungal Diversity 125(1):1−71 doi: 10.1007/s13225-023-00532-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20] Wang K, Zhao MJ, Cai L. 2026. The rise of China in fungal taxonomic studies and biodiversity cataloging in the past decade. Journal of Fungi 12(2):101 doi: 10.3390/jof12020101

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Yu X, Xiang C, Peng H. 2018. Taxonomy in the Kunming Institute of Botany (KIB): progress during the past decade (2008–2018) and perspectives on future development. Plant Diversity 40(4):147−157 doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2018.07.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22] Wang K, Lei C. 2023. Overview of the historical and current status of fungal taxonomy and diversity in China. Mycotaxon 42(1):50−62 doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.220497

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Li JF, Jiang HB, Jeewon R, Hongsanan S, Bhat DJ, et al. 2024. Author correction: Alternaria: update on species limits, evolution, multi-locus phylogeny, and classification. Studies in Fungi 9:e001 doi: 10.48130/sif-0024-0001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Gao Y, Zhong T, Wanasinghe DN, Eungwanichayapant PD, Jayawardena RS, et al. 2024. Phlyctema yunnanensis (Dermateaceae, Helotiales), a novel species from herbaceous plants in grassland ecosystems of Yunnan, China. Studies in Fungi 9:e019 doi: 10.48130/sif-0024-0020

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Luo C, Chen F, Phookamsak R, Sun F, Xu J, et al. 2024. Polyphasic taxonomic study of Absidia menglianensis sp. nov. (Cunninghamellaceae, Mucorales) isolated from an avocado plantation in Yunnan, China. Studies in Fungi 9:e018 doi: 10.48130/sif-0024-0018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Dissanayake LS, Phookamsak R, Xu J, Wanasinghe DN. 2024. Oxydothis ailaoshanensis sp. nov. (Oxydothidaceae, Xylariales) from dead bamboo culms in Yunnan Province, China. Studies in Fungi 9:e016 doi: 10.48130/sif-0024-0016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Chia P, Han MY, Karunarathna SC, Zheng DG, Lu WH, et al. 2025. Morphology and multi-locus phylogeny reveal Cordana puerensis sp. nov., a coffee-associated saprobic fungus from Pu'er, Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 725(2):144−158 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.725.2.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] Du TY, Tibpromma S, Hyde K, Wang Y, Jeewon R, et al. 2025. Fungal community composition associated with the agarwood-producing tree, Aquilaria sinensis. Mycosphere 16(1):2776−2847 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/18

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Han MY, Karunarathna SC, Lu L, Zheng D, Dai D, et al. 2025. Pseudodictyosporium yunnanensis sp. nov. (Dictyosporiaceae, Pleosporales) from dead twigs of Coffea arabica in China. Phytotaxa 711(1):28−42 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.711.1.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Han MY, Yang JY, Karunarathna SC, Kumla J, Lu L, et al. 2026. Two new Neohelicomyces species (Tubeufiaceae, Tubeufiales) associated with Coffea arabica L. in Yunnan Province, China. MycoKeys 127:343−362 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.127.173937

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Lu L, Karunarathna SC, Xiong YR, Han LS, Chen XM, et al. 2025. Taxonomy and systematics of micro-fungi associated with Coffea in southern China and northern Thailand. Fungal Diversity 135(1):469−743 doi: 10.1007/s13225-025-00566-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Lu WH, Alfagham AT, Tibpromma S, Suwannarach N, Kumla J, et al. 2025. Hidden in the daylight: a polyphasic approach reveals two bioluminescent Mycenaceae species from Yunnan Province, China (Basidiomycota, Agaricales). Biodiversity Data Journal 13:e168858 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.13.e168858

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Wanasinghe DN, Phookamsak R, Dissanayake LS, Xu J. 2025. Unexplored microfungal diversity from dead woody litter in the dry-hot valleys of Honghe (Yunnan, China). Studies in Fungi 10:e017 doi: 10.48130/sif-0025-0016

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Zheng DG, Tibpromma S, Lu WH, Han MY, Suwannarach N, et al. 2026. Two novel species belonging to Psathyrella sections Atomatae and Hydrophilae (Psathyrellaceae, Agaricales) from Yunnan Province, China, based on morphological and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses. MycoKeys 129:1−22 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.129.179449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Tian XG, Bao DF, Han J, Dai DQ, Lu Y, et al. 2026. Morphology and multi-locus phylogeny reveal 23 fungal taxa from terrestrial habitats. Mycology Latest article doi: 10.1080/21501203.2025.2594942

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36] Liu RM, Lu WH, Zhang GQ, Kumla J, Suwannarach N, et al. 2026. Inosperma lijiangense sp. nov. (Inocybaceae, Agaricales) from Yunnan Province, China. Phytotaxa 750(3):171−185 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.750.3.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Rathnayaka AR, Tennakoon DS, Gareth Jones EB, Wanasinghe DN, Bhat DJ, et al. 2025. Significance of precise documentation of hosts and geospatial data of fungal collections, with an emphasis on plant-associated fungi. New Zealand Journal of Botany 63(2–3):462−489 doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2024.2381734

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Senanayake I, Rathnayaka A, Marasinghe DS, Calabon M, Gentekaki E, et al. 2020. Morphological approaches in studying fungi: collection, examination, isolation, sporulation and preservation. Mycosphere 11(1):2678−2754 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/20

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Figueras M, Guarro J. 1997. X-ray microanalysis of black piedra. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 72(4):275−281 doi: 10.1023/A:1000409311166

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Ariyawansa HA, Bhat J, Buyck B, et al. 2015. The faces of fungi database: fungal names linked with morphology, phylogeny and human impacts. Fungal Diversity 74(1):3−18 doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0351-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41] Index Fungorum. 2025. www.indexfungorum.org/Names/Names.asp (accessed on 23 October 2025)
    [42] Su YY, Qi YL, Cai L. 2012. Induction of sporulation in plant pathogenic fungi. Mycology 3(3):195−200 doi: 10.1080/21501203.2012.719042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of Bacteriology 172(8):4238−4246 doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44] White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee SB, Taylor JW. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods Applications, eds. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ. New York, NY: Academic Press. pp. 315−322 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
    [45] Rehner S. 2001. Primers for Elongation Factor 1-α (EF1-α). http://ocid.NACSE.ORG/research/deephyphae (accessed on 23 September 2025)
    [46] Carbone I, Kohn LM. 1999. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia 91(3):553−556 doi: 10.1080/00275514.1999.12061051

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16(12):1799−1808 doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48] Woudenberg JHC, Aveskamp MM, De Gruyter J, Spiers A, Crous PW. 2009. Multiple Didymella teleomorphs are linked to the Phoma clematidina morphotype. Persoonia - Molecular Phylogeny Evolution of Fungi 22:56−62 doi: 10.3767/003158509X427808

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95−98

    Google Scholar

    [50] Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG. 1997. The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25(24):4876−4882 doi: 10.1093/nar/25.24.4876

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Katoh K, Standley DM. 2013. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30(4):772−780 doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP. 2003. MrBayes 3: bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19(12):1572−1574 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. Proceedings 2010 gateway computing environments workshop (GCE), New Orleans, LA, USA. New York, NY: IEEE. pp. 1–8 doi: 10.1109/GCE.2010.5676129
    [54] Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22(21):2688−2690 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Silvestro D, Michalak I. 2012. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 12(4):335−337 doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56] Jeewon R, Liew EC, Hyde KD. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of Pestalotiopsis and allied genera inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences and morphological characters. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 25(3):378−392 doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00422-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Jeewon R, Cai L, Liew ECY, Zhang KQ, Hyde KD. 2003. Dyrithiopsis lakefuxianensis gen. et sp. nov. from Fuxian Lake, Yunnan, China, and notes on the taxonomic confusion surrounding Dyrithium. Mycologia 95(5):911−920 doi: 10.1080/15572536.2004.11833050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58] Rambaut A. 2014. FigTreev1.4.2. A graphical viewer of phylogenetic trees. http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree (accessed on 15 December 2025)
    [59] Chu RT, Dou ZP, He W, Zhang Y. 2021. Two novel species of Botryosphaeria causing stem canker of blueberries from China. Mycosystema 40(3):473 doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.200333

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] Hyde KD, Suwannarach N, Jayawardena RS, Manawasinghe IS, Liao CF, et al. 2021. Mycosphere notes 325-344-novel species and records of fungal taxa from around the world. Mycosphere 12(1):1101−1156 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/14

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61] Sun YR, Hyde KD, Liu NG, Jayawardena RS, Wijayawardene N, et al. 2025. Micro-fungi in southern China and northern Thailand: emphasis on medicinal plants. Fungal Diversity 131:99−299 doi: 10.1007/s13225-024-00549-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62] Ren GC, Jayasiri SC, Tibpromma S, Farias ARG, Chethana KWT, et al. 2024. Saprobic ascomycetes associated with woody litter from the Greater Mekong Subregion (Southwestern China and Northern Thailand). Mycosphere 15(1):954−1082 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63] Pintos Á, Alvarado P. 2021. Phylogenetic delimitation of Apiospora and Arthrinium. Fungal Systematics Evolution 7:197−221 doi: 10.3114/fuse.2021.07.10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64] Wu W, Diao Y. 2022. Anamorphic chaetosphaeriaceous fungi from China. Fungal Diversity 116(1):1−546 doi: 10.1007/s13225-022-00509-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Liao MG, Luo XX, Xia JW, Hu YF, Zhang XG, et al. 2025. Six novel species of Distoseptispora (Distoseptisporaceae, Distoseptisporales) and Helminthosporium (Massarinaceae, Pleosporales) isolated from terrestrial habitats in southern China. Journal of Fungi 11(7):494 doi: 10.3390/jof11070494

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Mao X, Habib K, Zulfiqar R, Yang H, Kang Y. 2025. Three new species of Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) and a first record of Eutypa camelliae in China with updated description. MycoKeys 114:213–238 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.114.145312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Samarakoon MC, Hyde KD, Maharachchikumbura SS, Stadler M, Gareth Jones EB, et al. 2022. Taxonomy, phylogeny, molecular dating and ancestral state reconstruction of Xylariomycetidae (Sordariomycetes). Fungal Diversity 112(1):1−88 doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00495-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68] Hattori Y, Ando Y, Sasaki A, Uechi N, Nakashima C. 2021. Taxonomical study of noteworthy species of Botryosphaeria in Japan. Mycobiology 49(2):122−132 doi: 10.1080/12298093.2021.1895486

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Marsberg A, Kemler M, Jami F, Nagel JH, Postma-Smidt A, et al. 2017. Botryosphaeria dothidea: A latent pathogen of global importance to woody plant health. Molecular Plant Pathology 18:477−488 doi: 10.1111/mpp.12495

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Liu JK, Wu SP, Liu ZY. 2016. Additions to karst fungi 1: Botryosphaeria minutispermatia sp. nov., from Guizhou Province, China. Phytotaxa 275(1):35−44 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.275.1.4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71] Slippers B, Crous PW, Denman S, Coutinho TA, Wingfield BD, et al. 2004. Combined multiple gene genealogies and phenotypic characters differentiate several species previously identified as Botryosphaeria dothidea. Mycologia 96(1):83−101 doi: 10.1080/15572536.2005.11833000

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Phillips AJL, Alves A, Abdollahzadeh J, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, et al. 2013. The Botryosphaeriaceae: genera and species known from culture. Studies in Mycology 76(1):51−167 doi: 10.3114/sim0021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Phillips AJ, Hyde KD, Alves A, Liu JK. 2019. Families in Botryosphaeriales: a phylogenetic, morphological and evolutionary perspective. Fungal Diversity 94(5):1−22 doi: 10.1007/s13225-018-0416-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74] Luttrell ES. 1957. Helminthosporium nodulosum and related species. Phytopathology 47:540−548

    Google Scholar

    [75] Luttrell EJM. 1963. Taxonomic criteria in Helminthosporium. Mycologia 55:643

    Google Scholar

    [76] Luttrell EJM. 1964. Systematics of Helminthosporium and related genera. Mycologia 56(1):119−132 doi: 10.1080/00275514.1964.12018090

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Hughes SJ. 1980. Helminthosporium velutinum. Fungi Canadensis 163
    [78] Zhu D, Luo ZL, Baht DJ, McKenzie E, Bahkali AH, et al. 2016. Helminthosporium velutinum and H. aquaticum sp. nov. from aquatic habitats in Yunnan Province, China. Phytotaxa 253(3):179−190 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.253.3.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Voglmayr H, Jaklitsch WM. 2017. Corynespora, Exosporium and Helminthosporium revisited – new species and generic reclassification. Studies in Mycology 87:43−76 doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2017.05.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] Hu YF, Liu JW, Xu ZH, Castañeda-Ruíz RF, Zhang K, et al. 2023. Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed three new species of Helminthosporium (Massarinaceae, Pleosporales) from China. Journal of Fungi 9(2):280 doi: 10.3390/jof9020280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Zou M, Al-Otibi F, Hyde KD, Wang Y, Pan XJ. 2024. New Helminthosporium (Massarinaceae, Dothideomycetes) and Nigrospora (incertae sedis, Sordariomycetes) species associated with walnut (Juglans regia L.) in China. MycoKeys 109:265−284 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.109.133431

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Matsushima, T. 1980. Saprophytic microfungi from Taiwan, part 1. Hyphomycetes. Matsushima Mycological Memoirs 1:1−82

    Google Scholar

    [83] Simmonds JH. 1966. Host index of plant diseases in Queensland. Agricultural and Food Sciences. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:90658645 (accessed on 7 December 2025)
    [84] Kirk PM, Spooner B. 1984. An account of the fungi of Arran, Gigha and Kintyre. Kew Bulletin 38(4):503−597 doi: 10.2307/4108573

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Photita W, Lumyong P, McKenzie EHC, Hyde KD, Lumyong S. 2003. Saprobic fungi on dead wild banana. Mycotaxon 85:345−356 doi: 10.5962/p.414670

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86] Chen Y, Tian W, Guo Y, Madrid H, Maharachchikumbura SSN. 2022. Synhelminthosporium gen. et sp. nov. and two new species of Helminthosporium (Massarinaceae, Pleosporales) from Sichuan Province, China. Journal of Fungi (Basel) 8(7):712 doi: 10.3390/jof8070712

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Petrak F. 1923. Mykologische notizen. V. Annales Mycologici 21(1–2):1−69

    Google Scholar

    [88] Giraldo A, Crous PW, Schumacher RK, Cheewangkoon R, Ghobad-Nejhad M, et al. 2017. The genera of fungi—G3: Aleurocystis, Blastacervulus, Clypeophysalospora, Licrostroma, Neohendersonia and Spumatoria. Mycological Progress 16(4):325−348 doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1270-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Wanasinghe DN, Papizadeh M, Goonasekara ID, et al. 2016. Taxonomy and phylogeny of dematiaceous coelomycetes. Fungal Diversity 77(1):1−316 doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0360-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Hongsanan S, Hyde K, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe D, McKenzie E, et al. 2020. Refined families of Dothideomycetes: Dothideomycetidae and pleosporomycetidae. Mycosphere 11(1):1553−2107 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/13

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Jeewon R, Hyde KD. 2016. Establishing species boundaries and new taxa among fungi: recommendations to resolve taxonomic ambiguities. Mycosphere 7(11):1669−1677 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/7/11/4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Sutton BC. 1975. Coelomycetes V. Coryneum. Mycological Papers 138:1−224

    Google Scholar

    [93] Li GJ, Kevin HD, Zhao RL, Hongsanan S, Abdel-Aziz F, et al. 2016. Fungal diversity notes 253–366: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 78(1):1−237 doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0366-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Tanaka K, Hashimoto A, Matsumura M, Sato T. 2017. Brevicollum, a new genus in Neohendersoniaceae, Pleosporales. Mycologia 109(4):608−619 doi: 10.1080/00275514.2017.1387432

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Thambugala KM, Hyde KD, Tanaka K, Tian Q, Wanasinghe DN, et al. 2015. Towards a natural classification and backbone tree for Lophiostomataceae, Floricolaceae, and Amorosiaceae fam. nov. Fungal Diversity 74:199−266 doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0348-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Jaklitsch WM, Olariaga I, Voglmayr H. 2016. Teichospora and the Teichosporaceae. Mycological Progress 15:31 doi: 10.1007/s11557-016-1171-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Phukhamsakda C, McKenzie EHC, Phillips AJL, Gareth Jones EB, Jayarama Bhat D, et al. 2020. Microfungi associated with Clematis (Ranunculaceae) with an integrated approach to delimiting species boundaries. Fungal Diversity 102:1−203 doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00448-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Mortimer PE, Jeewon R, Xu JC, Lumyong S, Wanasinghe DN. 2021. Morpho-phylo taxonomy of novel Dothideomycetous fungi associated with dead woody twigs in Yunnan Province, China. Frontiers in Microbiology 12:654683 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.654683

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Hongsanan S, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Hyde KD, Samarakoon MC, Jeewon R, et al. 2017. An updated phylogeny of Sordariomycetes based on phylogenetic and molecular clock evidence. Fungal Diversity 84(3):25−41 doi: 10.1007/s13225-017-0384-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Schumacher RK, Akulov A, Bulgakov TS, et al. 2020. New and interesting fungi. 3. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 6(1):157−231 doi: 10.3114/fuse.2020.06.09

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Thilini Chethana KW, Rathnayaka AR, Samarakoon BC, Wu N, Wijesinghe SN, et al. 2023. AJOM new records and collections of fungi: 151–200. Asian Journal of Mycology 6(2):89−243 doi: 10.5943/ajom/6/2/7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Saccardo PA. 1875. Conspectus generum pyrenomycetum italicorum additis speciebus fungorum Venetorum novis vel criticis, systemate carpologico dispositorum. Atti della Società Veneto-Trentina di Scienze Naturali 4:77−100

    Google Scholar

    [103] Liao C, Senanayake IC, Dong W, Thilini Chethana KW, Tangtrakulwanich K, et al. 2023. Taxonomic and phylogenetic updates on Apiospora: introducing four new species from Wurfbainia villosa and grasses in China. Journal of Fungi 9(11):1087 doi: 10.3390/jof9111087

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104] Monkai J, Phookamsak R, Tennakoon DS, Bhat DJ, Xu S, et al. 2022. Insight into the taxonomic resolution of Apiospora: introducing novel species and records from bamboo in China and Thailand. Diversity 14(11):918 doi: 10.3390/d14110918

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105] Thambugala KM, Tennakoon DS, Samarakoon MC, Milanka I, Daranagama DA, et al. 2025. Discovery of Torula srijayewardenepurensis sp. nov. and distribution updates of Apiospora and Paradictyoarthrinium in Sri Lanka. Studies in Fungi 10:e032 doi: 10.48130/sif-0025-0035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Dai DQ, Phookamsak R, Wijayawardene NN, Li WJ, Bhat DJ, et al. 2017. Bambusicolous fungi. Fungal Diversity 82:1−105 doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0367-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Zhao HJ, Dong W, Shu YX, Mapook A, Manawasinghe IS, et al. 2023. Bambusicolous fungi in Guangdong, China: establishing Apiospora magnispora sp. nov. (Apiosporaceae, Amphisphaeriales) based on morphological and molecular evidence. Current Research in Environmental & Applied Mycology (Journal of Fungal Biology) 13(1):1−15 doi: 10.5943/cream/13/1/1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Yang CL, Xu XL, Dong W, Wanasinghe DN, Liu YG, et al. 2019. Introducing Arthrinium phyllostachium sp. nov. (Apiosporaceae, Xylariales) on Phyllostachys heteroclada from Sichuan province, China. Phytotaxa 406(2):91−110 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.406.2.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109] Teng SC. 1936. Additional fungi from China. II. Sinensia 7:490−527

    Google Scholar

    [110] Hashimoto A, Sato G, Matsuda T, Matsumura M, Hatakeyama S, et al. 2015. Taxonomic revision of Pseudolachnea and Pseudolachnella and establishment of Neopseudolachnella and Pseudodinemasporium gen. nov. Mycologia 107(2):383−408 doi: 10.3852/14-171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Li WJ, McKenZie EHC, Liu JK, Bhat DJ, et al. 2020. Taxonomy and phylogeny of hyaline-spored coelomycetes. Fungal Diversity 100(1):279−801 doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00440-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Huanraluek N, Padaruth OD, Jayawardena RS, Li WJ, Hongsanan S, et al. 2021. https://coelomycetes.org: data bank that contributes for the classification, identification, and nomenclature of coelomycetes. Asian Journal of Mycology 4(2):114−122 doi: 10.5943/ajom/4/2/8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113] Su H, Hyde KD, Maharachchikumbura SSN, Ariyawansa HA, Luo Z, et al. 2016. The families Distoseptisporaceae fam. nov., Kirschsteiniotheliaceae, Sporormiaceae and Torulaceae, with new species from freshwater in Yunnan Province, China. Fungal Diversity 80(1):375−409 doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0362-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Yang J, Liu LL, Garth Jones EB, Li WL, Hyde KD, et al. 2021. Morphological variety in Distoseptispora and introduction of six novel species. Journal of Fungi 7(11):945 doi: 10.3390/jof7110945

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115] Konta S, Tibpromma S, Karunarathna SC, Samarakoon MC, Steven LS, et al. 2023. Morphology and multigene phylogeny reveal ten novel taxa in ascomycota from terrestrial palm substrates (Arecaceae) in Thailand. Mycosphere 14(1):107−152 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Hu YF, Liu JW, Luo XX, Xu ZH, Xia JW, et al. 2023. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses reveal eight novel species of Distoseptispora from Southern China. Microbiology Spectrum 11(6):e02468-23 doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02468-23

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Ma Q, Wang Y, Shen HW, Luo ZL, Su XJ. 2025. Distoseptispora pulchra sp. nov. and D. liupanshuiensis from freshwater habitats in Yunnan Province, China. Phytotaxa 725(1):24−40 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.725.1.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Liu W, Yin C, Jiang Y, Yan X, Wang X, et al. 2025. Discovery and identification of four novel species of Distoseptispora (Distoseptisporaceae, Distoseptisporales) on decaying wood from Hainan and Fujian Provinces, China. Journal of Fungi 11(9):667 doi: 10.3390/jof11090667

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Monkai J, Boonmee S, Ren GC, Wei DP, Phookamsak R, et al. 2020. Distoseptispora hydei sp. nov. (Distoseptisporaceae), a novel lignicolous fungus on decaying bamboo in Thailand. Phytotaxa 459(2):93−107 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.459.2.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120] Carmarán CC, Romero AI, Giussani LM. 2006. An approach towards a new phylogenetic classification in Diatrypaceae. Fungal Diversity 23:67−87

    Google Scholar

    [121] Vasilyeva LN, Rogers JD. 2010. Some new pyrenomycetous and loculoascomycetous fungi on the endemic Hawaiian plant Hibiscadelphus giffardianus. Mycotaxon 113(1):273−281 doi: 10.5248/113.273

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122] Mihai-Iulian R. 2013. Ascomycota macrofungi new to Romania. Acta Horti Botanici Bucurestiensis 40(1):57−64 doi: 10.2478/ahbb-2013-0007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Li QR, Long SH, Lin Y, Wu YP, Wu QZ, et al. 2023. Diversity, morphology, and molecular phylogeny of Diatrypaceae from southern China. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1140190 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1140190

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124] Shang QJ, Hyde KD, Phookamsak R, Doilom M, Bhat DJ, et al. 2017. Diatrypella tectonae and Peroneutypa mackenziei spp. nov. (Diatrypaceae) from northern Thailand. Mycological Progress 16(4):463−476 doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1294-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125] Senwanna C, Phookamsak R, Doilom M, Hyde KD, Cheewangkoon R. 2017. Novel taxa of Diatrypaceae from Para rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) in northern Thailand; introducing a novel genus Allocryptovalsa. Mycosphere 8(10):1835−1855 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/8/10/9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Du TY, Karunarathna SC, Zhang X, Dai DQ, Gao Y, et al. 2022. Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed Peroneutypa aquilariae sp. nov. (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) from Aquilaria sinensis in Yunnan Province, China. Studies in Fungi 7:18 doi: 10.48130/sif-2022-0018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Lu L, Karunarathna SC, Rajeshkumar KC, Elgorban AM, Jayawardena RS, et al. 2025. Unveiling fungal diversity associated with coffee trees in China using a polyphasic approach and a global review of coffee saprobic fungi. IMA Fungus 16:e144874 doi: 10.3897/imafungus.16.144874

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Dissanayake AJ, Shang QJ, Chi MF, Hyde KD, Liu JK. 2025. Insights into the taxonomy and phylogeny of Diatrypaceae. Fungal Diversity 134(1):461−634 doi: 10.1007/s13225-025-00563-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Shang QJ, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Khan S, Promputtha I, et al. 2018. Morpho-molecular characterization of Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales) with two novel species from Thailand. Phytotaxa 356(1):1−18 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.356.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Pongcharoen W, Rukachaisirikul V, Phongpaichit S, Rungjindamai N, Sakayaroj J. 2006. Pimarane diterpene and cytochalasin derivatives from the endophytic fungus Eutypella scoparia PSU-D44. Journal of Natural Products 69(5):856−858 doi: 10.1021/np0600649

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Afshari N, De Farias AR, de Silva NI, Bhunjun CS, Lumyong S. 2023. Additions to Peroneutypa (Diatrypaceae, Xylariales): introducing P. nayariophyti sp. nov. and new host associations of P. scoparia from northern Thailand. Phytotaxa 620(3):201−215 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.620.3.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [132] de Errasti A, Victoria Novas M, Carmarán CC. 2014. Plant-fungal association in trees: insights into changes in ecological strategies of Peroneutypa scoparia (Diatrypaceae). Flora 209(12):704−710 doi: 10.1016/j.flora.2014.07.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [133] Ellis MB. 1963. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. V. Mycological Papers 93:1−33

    Google Scholar

    [134] Ellis MB. 1971. Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. Kew, Surrey, England: Commonwealth Mycological Institute, CAB International. www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.5555/19721392736
    [135] Goh TK, Hyde KD. 1997. Melanographium palmicolum sp. nov. from Hong Kong, and a key to the genus. Mycological Research 101(9):1097−1100 doi: 10.1017/S0953756297003675

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] Somrithipol S, Gareth Jones EB. 2005. An addition to the hyphomycete genus Melanographium from Thailand. Fungal Diversity 19:137−144

    Google Scholar

    [137] Zhang SN, Hyde KD, Gareth Jones EB, Yu XD, Cheewangkoon R, et al. 2024. Current insights into palm fungi with emphasis on taxonomy and phylogeny. Fungal Diversity 127(3):55−301 doi: 10.1007/s13225-024-00536-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [138] Kunming Institute of Botany. 2021. Yunnan initiative helps preserve rare flora. (http://english.kib.cas.cn/rh/es/202110/t20211021_286448.html)
    [139] Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Xu J, Cheewangkoon R, Mortimer PE. 2020. Taxonomic novelties in Magnolia-associated pleosporalean fungi in the Kunming Botanical Gardens (Yunnan, China). PLoS One 15(7):e0235855 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235855

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140] Bradshaw MJ, Quijada L, Tobin PC, Braun E, Newlander C, et al. 2022. More than just plants: botanical gardens are an untapped source of fungal diversity. HortSciences 57(10):1289−1293 doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI16755-22

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141] Hawksworth DL. 2004. Fungal diversity and its implications for genetic resource collections. Studies in Mycology 50(1):9−18

    Google Scholar

    [142] Kembel SW, Mueller RC. 2014. Plant traits and taxonomy drive host associations in tropical phyllosphere fungal communities. Botany 92(4):303−311 doi: 10.1139/cjb-2013-0194

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143] Saccardo PA. 1913. Notae mycologicae. Series XVI. Annales Mycologici 11(4):312−325

    Google Scholar

    [144] Hyde KD, Dong Y, Phookamsak R, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, et al. 2020. Fungal diversity notes 1151–1276: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 100:5−277 doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00439-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [145] Srivastava N, Morgan-Jones G. 1996. Notes on hyphomycetes. LXX. A new species of Melanographium from India, with comments on the genus. Mycotaxon 57:195−200 doi: 10.5962/p.415954

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [146] Pegler DN, Roberts PJ, Spooner BM. 2000. New British records 166–173. Mycologist 14(1):29−31

    Google Scholar

    [147] Wijesinghe SN, Deng YL, Yuan Q, Zhou HM, Wang L, et al. 2025. Mycosphere notes 572–624: exploring the hidden diversity of fungi and fungi-like taxa in different terrestrial microhabitats. Mycosphere 16(1):2975−3129 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/21

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148] de Silva NI, Hyde KD, Lumyong S, Phillips AJL, Bhat DJ, et al. 2022. Morphology, phylogeny, host association and geography of fungi associated with plants of Annonaceae, Apocynaceae and Magnoliaceae. Mycosphere 13(1):955−1076 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/12

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149] Jayasiri SC, Hyde KD, Jones EBG, McKenzie EHC, Jeewon R, et al. 2019. Diversity, morphology and molecular phylogeny of Dothideomycetes on decaying wild seed pods and fruits. Mycosphere 10(1):1−186 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150] Phookamsak R, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Bhat DJ, Gareth Jones EB, et al. 2019. Fungal diversity notes 929–1035: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungi. Fungal Diversity 95:1−273 doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00421-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [151] Manawasinghe IS, Calabon MS, Jones EBG, Zhang YX, Liao CF, et al. 2022. Mycosphere notes 345–386. Mycosphere 13(1):454−557 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152] Wanasinghe DN, Nimalrathna TS, Xian LQ, Faraj TK, Xu J, et al. 2024. Taxonomic novelties and global biogeography of Montagnula (Ascomycota, Didymosphaeriaceae). MycoKeys 101:191−232 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.101.113259

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153] Hyde KD, Norphanphoun C, Abreu VP, Bazzicalupo A, Thilini Chethana KW, et al. 2017. Fungal diversity notes 603–708: taxonomic and phylogenetic notes on genera and species. Fungal Diversity 87(1): 1−235 doi: 10.1007/s13225-017-0391-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [154] Yang EF, Phookamsak R, Jiang HB, Tibpromma S, Bhat DJ, et al. 2022. Taxonomic reappraisal of Periconiaceae with the description of three new Periconia species from China. Journal of Fungi 8(3):243 doi: 10.3390/jof8030243

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [155] Phookamsak R, Hongsanan S, Bhat DJ, Wanasinghe DN, Promputtha I, et al. 2024. Exploring ascomycete diversity in Yunnan II: introducing three novel species in the suborder Massarineae (Dothideomycetes, Pleosporales) from fern and grasses. MycoKeys 104:9−50 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.104.112149

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [156] Phukhamsakda C, Jeewon R, McKenzie EHC, Xu JC. 2019. Morphology and phylogeny of Phaeoseptum mali sp. nov. (Phaeoseptaceae, Pleosporales) on bark of Malus halliana. Asian Journal of Mycology 2(1):118−128 doi: 10.5943/ajom/2/1/6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157] Boonmee S, Wanasinghe DN, Calabon MS, Huanraluek N, Chandrasiri SK, et al. 2021. Fungal diversity notes 1387–1511: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 111:1−335 doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00489-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158] Wanasinghe DN, Phukhamsakda C, Hyde KD, Jeewon R, Lee HB, et al. 2018. Fungal diversity notes 709–839: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa with an emphasis on fungi on Rosaceae. Fungal Diversity 89:1−236 doi: 10.1007/s13225-018-0395-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [159] Wanasinghe DN, Maharachchikumbura SSN. 2023. Exploring the diversity and systematics of Phaeosphaeriaceae: taxonomic novelties from ecologically diverse habitats and their phylogenetic resolution. Journal of Fungi 9(8):853 doi: 10.3390/jof9080853

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160] Karunarathna A, Phookamsak R, Wanasinghe DN, Wijayawardene NN, Weerahewa HLD, et al. 2017. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Sparticola muriformis sp. nov. on decaying grass. Mycosphere 8(4):603−614 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/8/4/9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [161] Phookamsak R, Jiang H, Suwannarach N, Lumyong S, Xu J, et al. 2022. Bambusicolous fungi in Pleosporales: introducing four novel taxa and a new habitat record for Anastomitrabeculia didymospora. Journal of Fungi 8(6):630 doi: 10.3390/jof8060630

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [162] Tun ZL, Thiyagaraja V, Bhunjun CS, Maharachchikumbura SN, Al-Otibi F, et al. 2025. Sexual and asexual morphs of Thyronectria kunmingensis sp. nov. (Nectriaceae) from Yunnan, China. Chiang Mai Journal of Science 52(5):e2025065 doi: 10.12982/CMJS.2025.065

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [163] Liu JW, Cai Q, Cui YY, Yang ZL. 2017. Amanita cingulata, a new annulate species of Amanita sect. Vaginatae from subtropical China. Phytotaxa 326(1):41−53 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.326.1.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [164] Cai Q, Cui YY, Yang ZL. 2016. Lethal Amanita species in China. Mycologia 108(5):993−1009 doi: 10.3852/16-008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [165] Cai Q, Tulloss RE, Tang LP, Tolgor B, Zhang P, et al. 2014. Multi-locus phylogeny of lethal amanitas: implications for species diversity and historical biogeography. BMC Evolutionary Biology 14:143 doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-14-143

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [166] Wijayawardene NN, Phillips AJL, Tibpromma S, Dai DQ, Selbmann L, et al. 2021. Looking for the undiscovered asexual taxa: case studies from lesser studied life modes and habitats. Mycosphere 12(1):1290−1333 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/12/1/17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [167] Shao SC, Buyck B, Tian XF, Liu PG, Geng YH. 2016. Cantharellus phloginus, a new pink-colored species from southwestern China. Mycoscience 57(2):144−149 doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2015.12.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [168] Shao SC, Tian XF, Liu PG. 2011. Cantharellus in southwestern China: a new species and a new record. Mycotaxon 116(1):437−466 doi: 10.5248/116.437

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [169] Tian XF, Buyck B, Shao SC, Liu PG, Fang Y. 2012. Cantharellus zangii, a new subalpine basidiomycete from southwestern China. Mycotaxon 120(1):99−103 doi: 10.5248/120.99

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [170] Wu G, Li YC, Zhu XT, Zhao K, Han LH, et al. 2016. One hundred noteworthy boletes from China. Fungal Diversity 81(1):25−188 doi: 10.1007/s13225-016-0375-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [171] Hao YJ, Qin J, Yang ZL. 2014. Cibaomyces, a new genus of Physalacriaceae from East Asia. Phytotaxa 162(4):198−210 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.162.4.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [172] Qin J, Yang ZL. 2016. Cyptotrama (Physalacriaceae, Agaricales) from Asia. Fungal Biology 120(4):513−529 doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2016.01.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [173] Ge ZW, Liu XB, Zhao K, Yang ZL. 2015. Species diversity of Flammulina in China: new varieties and a new record. Mycosystema Fungal Biology 34:589−603 doi: 10.13346/j.mycosystema.150080

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [174] Ge ZW, Yang ZL, Zhang PB, Matheny PB, Hibbett DS. 2008. Flammulina species from China inferred by morphological and molecular data. Fungal Diversity 32:59−68

    Google Scholar

    [175] Li YC, Yang ZL. 2021. The boletes of China: Tylopilus sl. Singapore: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-2986-0
    [176] Qin J, Hao YJ, Yang ZL, Li YC. 2014. Paraxerula ellipsospora, a new Asian species of Physalacriaceae. Mycological Progress 13(3):639−647 doi: 10.1007/s11557-013-0946-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [177] Ge ZW, Yang ZL. 2017. Pseudolepiota zangmui gen. et sp. nov. (Agaricaceae, Basidiomycota), a new white-spored mushroom from China. Phytotaxa 312(2):247–255 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.312.2.7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [178] Tang LP, Hao YJ, Cai Q, Tolgor B, Yang ZL. 2014. Morphological and molecular evidence for a new species of Rhodotus from tropical and subtropical Yunnan, China. Mycological Progress 13(1):45−53 doi: 10.1007/s11557-013-0890-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [179] Shi XF, Yu FQ, Zhang R, Liu PG. 2016. Two new species of Suillus associated with larches in China. Mycotaxon 131(2):305−315 doi: 10.5248/131.305

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [180] Wan SP, Tang L, Zheng Y, Yu FQ. 2017. Two novel Tuber species (Tuberaceae, Pezizales) in the Latisporum Group from China. Mycoscience 58(5):312−319 doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2017.02.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [181] Wan SP, Wang XH, Zheng Y, Yu FQ. 2016. Tuber shidianense and T. calosporum, two new truffle species from southwest China. Mycoscience 57(6):393−399 doi: 10.1016/J.MYC.2016.06.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [182] Xu W, Wan S, Huang L, Zheng Y, Gong H, et al. 2017. Tuber sinoniveum, a new white Chinese truffle species from Yunnan, China. Phytotaxa 298(3):253–260 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.298.3.4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Xu RF, Liu R, Jiang HB, et al. 2026. Additions to saprobic Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China. Studies in Fungi 11: e024 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0024
    Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Xu RF, Liu R, Jiang HB, et al. 2026. Additions to saprobic Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China. Studies in Fungi 11: e024 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0024

Figures(18)  /  Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(264) PDF downloads(74)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Additions to saprobic Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China

Studies in Fungi  11,  Article number: e024  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Our efforts to investigate microfungi in the Kunming Institute of Botany (KIB) garden have led to the discovery of several fungi on dead plant parts. Through comprehensive morphological studies, illustrations, and combined multi-locus phylogenies, we identified nine taxa from our collections, all belonging to the classes Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes. In particular, we introduce seven new host records and two new species, each with unique characteristics. The discovery of these new species, Melanographium trachycarpi and Neohendersonia camelliae, greatly enhances our understanding of fungal diversity and paves the way for further research. Meanwhile, Botryosphaeria dolichospermatii and Pseudolachnella tengii are reported here for the first time in their sexual form, which has the potential to further expand our knowledge. Additionally, a checklist of fungi collected from KIB between 2010 and 2025 is included for maintenance and institutional record-keeping, for those interested in fungi at KIB.

    • The capabilities of fungi are remarkable in addressing future global demands, encompassing health, sustainable agriculture, and renewable energy[1]. Therefore, it is our responsibility to recognize the presence of concealed mycota worldwide. These newly discovered species will play a significant role in advancing agriculture, industrial biotechnology, medicine, and disease control[1]. To achieve these advancements, we must be diligent in our scientific practices, ensuring robust taxon sampling and accurate referencing when introducing new fungal taxa. This is crucial for achieving better outcomes in fungal research and driving progress in our fields[2]. In fungi, there are two of the two largest classes within the Ascomycota phylum: Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes. Members of them occur as pathogens, saprobes, endophytes, or epiphytes, and are widely utilized in economically significant industries[3−5]. Their diverse functions as metabolites and biocontrol agents make them a fascinating area of study[6,7]. Dothideomycetes are primarily distinguished by the presence of bitunicate asci, which possess two wall layers and are often fissitunicate[8−10]. In contrast, Sordariomycetes are characterized by inoperculate, unitunicate asci lacking a hinged cap and with a single wall layer[11]. Traditional identification of fungi, especially within the diverse Ascomycota classes Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes, primarily relies on morphological characteristics observed under microscopy, such as the structure of fruiting bodies (ascomata), ascus type, and spore (ascospore or conidia) morphology[9,10]. Although contemporary research incorporates DNA-based molecular techniques, traditional morphological methods continue to serve as the foundation for preliminary classification and the description of new species[2,12,13]. Both classes exhibit a wide range of lifestyles; notably, saprobic fungi, as major decomposers of organic matter, play a crucial ecological role in terrestrial and aquatic environments[9,11,14,15]. Their substantial influence on plant primary production, carbon mineralization, and segregation is a testament to their significant contribution to the environment[14,16]. Moreover, fungi's adaptability to various conditions, such as moisture levels, temperature, substrate availability, and nutrient content, significantly influences their ability to decompose organic matter[17]. Studying fungal distribution worldwide is crucial to a better understanding of the fungal cycle and its changes[18].

      The study of fungal diversity has several crucial aspects, including biotechnology research, understanding ecosystem functioning, and protecting human health and agricultural security[2,19,20]. Fungal biodiversity hotspots around the world significantly impact the increasing number and diversity of both micro- and macro-fungi. The magnitude of our discoveries is truly impressive. As of the present, 15,266 new fungal species have been reported in China, underscoring the country's considerable biodiversity[21]. The majority of these species are found in Southern China and account for 8.69% of all globally described fungal species, placing China second only to the United States[2,22,23]. These discoveries have been documented across all 34 provincial-level regions, with Yunnan Province reporting the highest number at 3,869 species, nearly one-fifth of the national total. The distinctive geographical features of Yunnan support both a highland cold-resistant biome in the west and a tropical biome in the south and southwest, making the province a key area for fungal discoveries and a leading hotspot for biotechnology research[23−37].

      This study aims to advance understanding of the diversity and distribution of saprobic fungal communities in the KIB using both morphological and molecular approaches. Dead plant material bearing fungal fruiting bodies was collected from the KIB premises in Kunming, Yunnan, China, to facilitate the identification of both novel and previously known saprobic fungal species. Through detailed morphological examination and multi-locus phylogenetic analyses, two new species and seven new records within Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes were identified from the KIB garden. Furthermore, this research presents the first comprehensive checklist of fungi collected at KIB, establishing a valuable resource for future studies.

    • Dead and decaying branches, petioles, and culms with fungal fruiting bodies were collected from the garden of the Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan Province, China, and taken to the KIB mycology laboratory after important collection details were recorded[38]. The specimens were examined under an Olympus SZ61 (Japan) series stereo- and light microscope, photographed with an OLYMPUS SZ2-ILST and an Industrial Digital Camera 16NP USB3.0 (Panasonic, Japan) microscope imaging system. The morphological characteristics of the fungi were recorded. We followed the method of Senanayake et al.[38] to isolate a single spore and obtain a pure culture of the fungus on potato dextrose agar (PDA). Microstructural observation was performed using scanning electron microscopy (ZEISS GeminiSEM and ZEISS Sigma 300 apparatus). Spores or other relevant structures were carefully isolated with a needle under a stereomicroscope and transferred onto an aluminum specimen stub, pre-coated with conductive adhesive to ensure well-dispersed, non-overlapping placement. The mounted sample was rapidly frozen. In a low-temperature preparation chamber, the sample was coated with a thin layer of gold under vacuum for approximately 30 min to enhance conductivity and minimize charging during observation. After coating, the frozen sample was maintained at a low temperature and directly transferred to the SEM chamber for imaging. Images were acquired at appropriate accelerating voltages and magnifications to examine the surface structure of the samples[39]. The Tarosoft Image Framework program v0.9.0.7. was used to measure all microscopic structures of the fungi, and Adobe Photoshop CS3 Extended v10.0 (Adobe Systems, USA) was used to process and edit the images used in the figures. Herbarium specimens are deposited in the Kunming Institute of Botany, Academia Sinica (KUN-HKAS), while the living cultures are deposited in the Kunming Institute of Botany Culture Collection (KUNCC/KUMCC). Facesoffungi (FoF) number and Index Fungorum (IF) number were obtained as explained in Jayasiri et al.[40] and Index Fungorum[41], respectively. In addition, sexual/asexual morphs sporulation in the culture medium was induced following a slightly modified method of Su et al.[42]. Sterilized toothpicks and pine needles were placed on either side of a PDA plate, and a small piece of mycelium grown on PDA was placed on the baits. The cultures were incubated at 28 °C. For in vitro sporulation, the plates were examined using a stereo microscope. Fungal microstructures were prepared on slides, observed, photographed, measured, and compiled into a photographic plate.

    • Actively growing mycelium was carefully scraped from a 7–10-day-old PDA culture using a sterile scalpel and transferred into a 1.5 mL centrifuge tube for DNA extraction. The Biospin Fungus Genomic DNA Extraction Kit–BSC14S1 (BioFlux, China) was used to extract DNA, following the manufacturer's instructions, and extracted DNA was preserved at −20 °C. DNA amplifications were performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). A portion of the large-subunit nuclear rRNA gene (LSU) was amplified using primer pairs LR0R and LR5[43]. The small 18S subunit nuclear rRNA gene (SSU) was amplified with primer pairs NS1 and NS4[44]. Primer pairs ITS4 and ITS5 were used to amplify the 5.8S rDNA gene and flanking internal transcribed spacers (ITS)[44]. The translation elongation factor 1-alpha gene (tef1) was amplified by using primers EF1-983F and EF1-2218R[45], or the primers EF1-728F and EF1-986R[46]. The RNA polymerase II second-largest subunit (rpb2) gene was amplified with primers fRPB2 and fRPB2-7cR[47]. The beta-tubulin (tub2) gene was amplified using primers Btub2Fd and Btub4Rd[48]. The PCR thermal cycle programs for ITS, LSU, and SSU were as follows: an initialization step of 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, an annealing step at 55 °C for 50 s, an elongation step at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR thermal cycle programs for rpb2, tef1, and tub2 was as follows: an initialization step of 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 50 s, an annealing step (52 °C, 30 s for tub2; 55 °C, 50 s for rpb2, and tef1), an elongation step at 72 °C for 90 s, and a final extension step of 72 °C for 10 min.

    • The ITS, LSU, SSU, and protein-coding genes (rpb2, tef1, and tub2) were used for different fungal groups as needed. All reference sequences were retrieved from GenBank using the latest references for each fungal group. Sequences were aligned with BioEdit v5.0.6[49] and ClustalX v1.83[50], or with MAFFT v6.864b (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.html)[51]. The alignments were visually checked and manually improved where necessary. Phylogenetic analyses were carried out with MrBayes v3.2.7a[52] for Bayesian inference analysis (BI). A Maximum Likelihood analysis (ML) was performed via the CIPRES web portal[53] using RAxML v7.2.8 as part of the 'RAxML-HPC2 on TG' tool[54] or implemented in RAxMLGUI v0.9b2[55]. Other phylogenetic details are outlined in Jeewon et al.[56,57]. Phylogenetic trees were drawn with FigTree v1.4[58]. Maximum likelihood bootstrap support (MLBS) equal or greater than 50%–70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities (BYPP) values equal or greater than 0.95 are indicated on the resulting tree topology in each figure. Newly generated sequences were deposited at the NCBI GenBank. GenBank accession numbers for sequenced genes are given in the descriptions under the materials examined. The same isolate was duplicated and remade as sequences A and B.

    • In this paper, we describe two new species and seven new records of saprobic fungal strains collected from the KIB (Yunnan, China). The novelties are morphologically illustrated, and phylogenies based on multi-locus sequence data are provided to accommodate species in their orders, families, and genera where appropriate.

    • Analysis 1: Botryosphaeria phylogeny was based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1, and tub2 sequence data.

      Forty strains are included in the combined analyses, which comprise 2,223 characters across the ITS, LSU, tef1, and tub2 alignments. Macrophomina phaseolina (CBS 227.33 and CBS 162.25) was used as the outgroup taxon, and related sequences were obtained as described by Tian et al.[59]. Single-loci analyses were performed to compare the topology and clade stability with those of combined-locus analyses. The tree topology of the ML analysis is similar to that of the BI analysis. The best RAxML tree had a final likelihood value of −4756.457710. The matrix contained 267 distinct alignment patterns, with 18.94% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.226896, C = 0.273860, G = 0.274223, T = 0.225021; substitution rates AC = 0.835737, AG = 2.668379, AT = 1.055693, CG = 0.817208, CT = 6.080596, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.084375. The collection (KUMCC 21-0103A, KUMCC 21-0103B) in the present study phylogenetically clustered with B. dolichospermatii strains (CGMCC 3.19098, CGMCC 3.19097, CGMCC 3.19096).

      Analysis 2: Helminthosporium phylogeny was based on combined LSU, SSU, ITS, and tef1 sequence data.

      Fifty-six strains were included in the analyses, comprising 3,776 characters including gaps. The tree is rooted with Periconia pseudodigitata (KT1395), and related sequences were obtained from Hyde et al.[60]. The matrix contained 1,263 distinct alignment patterns, with 36.99% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows; A = 0.240622, C = 0.242963, G = 0.270350, T = 0.246065; substitution rates AC = 1.991544, AG = 3.170223, AT = 2.023982, CG = 0.880620, CT = 7.722965, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.171719. The trees from the two analyses (ML and BI) were identical. Our collection (KKMCC 21-0076) in the present study phylogenetically clustered between H. velutinum strains (MFLUCC 16-1360, MFLUCC 16-1096, CPC 26297, L131, CGMCC 3.23572) with statistical support (96% MLBS/1.00BYPP).

      Analysis 3: Neohendersonia phylogeny was based on combined SSU, LSU, and ITS sequence data.

      Nineteen strains were included in the combined analyses, which comprise 2,681 characters for SSU, LSU, and ITS alignment. Boeremia exigua (CBS 431.74) was used as the outgroup taxon, and related sequences were obtained following Sun et al.[61]. Single-locus analyses were performed to compare the topology and clade stability with those of combined-locus analyses. The tree topology of the ML analysis is similar to the BI analysis. The best RAxML tree had a final likelihood value of −7346.622368. The matrix contained 461 distinct alignment patterns, with 24.34% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.250407, C = 0.221818, G = 0.276438, T = 0.251338; substitution rates AC = 1.578736, AG = 3.664305, AT = 1.349205, CG = 0.450256, CT = 6.079060, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.079251. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses showed that our strains (KUMCC 21-0056, KUMCC 21-0107) belong to Neohendersonia and form a well-separated lineage from N. kickxii and N. tongrenensis.

      Analysis 4: Magnibotryascoma phylogeny was based on combined LSU, SSU, ITS, tef1, and rpb2 sequence data.

      Fifty-three strains were included in the analyses, comprising 4,359 characters, including gaps. The tree was rooted with Lophiostoma arundinis (CBS 621.86), and related sequences were obtained from Ren et al.[62]. The matrix contained 1,143 distinct alignment patterns, with 46.56% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows; A = 0.242454, C = 0.254882, G = 0.276848, T = 0.225816; substitution rates AC = 1.235534, AG = 2.891989, AT = 1.669777, CG = 1.089129, CT = 8.990044, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.178080. The trees from the two analyses (ML and BI) were identical. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses show that our new isolate (KUMCC 21-0112) clusters with M. mali (KUMCC 21-0516) but receives low statistical support.

      Analysis 5: Apiospora phylogeny was based on ITS sequence data.

      Seventy-nine strains were included in the analyses, comprising 913 characters for the ITS alignment. Seiridium phylicae (CBS 133587) in Sporocadaceae (Amphisphaeriales) is used as the outgroup taxon, and related sequences are taken from Pintos & Alvarado[63]. The tree topology of the ML analysis is similar to the Bayesian analysis. The best RaxML tree with a final likelihood value of −5256.291374 is presented. The matrix contained 439 distinct alignment patterns, with 25.11% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.239919, C = 0.248556, G = 0.233761, T = 0.277764; substitution rates AC = 0.826486, AG = 1.770838, AT = 0.788607, CG = 0.944632, CT = 2.720760, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.301517. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses show that our new isolate (KUMCC 21-0047) clusters with A. yunnana strains, with high statistical support (100% MLBS/1.00 BYPP).

      Analysis 6: Pseudolachnella phylogeny was based on combined LSU, ITS, and tef1 sequence data.

      Thirty strains were included in the analyses, comprising 2,869 characters in the LSU, ITS, and tef1 alignments. Dinemasporium strigosum (MAFF 244355) and D. cruciferum (MAFF 244327) are used as outgroup taxa, and related sequences are taken from Wu & Diao[64]. Single-locus analyses were performed to compare the topology and clade stability with those of combined-locus analyses. The tree topology of the ML analysis is similar to the Bayesian analysis. The best RaxML tree with a final likelihood value of −3089.572070 is presented. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.259453, C = 0.230435, G = 0.223495, T = 0.286617; substitution rates AC = 0.775950, AG = 1.961909, AT = 0.980782, CG = 0.452485, CT = 3.571483, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.150142. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses show our new isolate (KUMCC 21-0048) clustered with P. tengii (NN047882) with high statistical support (100% MLBS/1.00 BYPP).

      Analysis 7: Distoseptispora phylogeny was based on combined ITS, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 sequence data.

      Eighty-six strains were included in the combined analyses, which comprise 3,466 characters for ITS LSU, tef1, and rpb2 after alignment. Pseudostanjehughesia aquitropica (MFLUCC 16-0569) and P. lignicola (MFLUCC 15-0352) were used as the outgroup taxa, and related sequences were obtained following Liao et al.[65]. Single-locus analyses were performed to compare the topology and clade stability with those of combined-gene analyses. The tree topology of the ML analysis is similar to the Bayesian analysis. The best RaxML tree with a final likelihood value of −35748.256699 is presented. The matrix contained 1,775 distinct alignment patterns, with 28.49% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.240683, C = 0.265261, G = 0.282208, T = 0.211848; substitution rates AC = 1.367285, AG = 3.313867, AT = 1.258963, CG = 0.898119, CT = 6.927241, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.254970. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses showed that Distoseptispora and our strain (KUMCC 21-0039) clustered with D. guizhouensis (GZCC 21-0666) with high statistical support (100% MLBS/1.00 BYPP).

      Analysis 8: Peroneutypa phylogeny was based on combined ITS and tub2 sequence data.

      Forty-three strains were included in the combined analyses, which comprised 1,182 characters in the ITS and tub2 alignments. Allocryptovalsa polyspora (MFLU 17-1218) and A. elaeidis (MFLUCC 15-0707) were used as the outgroup taxa, and related sequences were obtained following Mao et al.[66]. Single-locus analyses were performed to compare the topology and clade stability with those of combined-locus analyses. The tree topology of the ML analysis is similar to the Bayesian analysis. The best RAxML tree had a final likelihood value of −9820.994449. The matrix contained 748 distinct alignment patterns, with 35.42% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.214321, C = 0.280618, G = 0.243945, T = 0.261117; substitution rates AC = 0.864463, AG = 2.289966, AT = 1.381503, CG = 1.060632, CT = 3.181007, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.513331. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses show that our new isolates (KUMCC 21-0049, KUMCC 21-0100) are sister lineages to P. scoparia (MFLUCC 11-0478), with 70% MLBS statistical support.

      Analysis 9: Melanographium phylogeny was based on combined LSU, ITS, SSU, tef1, and rpb2 sequence data.

      Fourteen strains were included in the analyses, which comprised 4,428 characters for LSU, ITS, SSU, tef1, and rpb2 alignment. Related sequences are taken from Samarakoon et al.[67]. Two strains from Zygosporium oscheoides (MFLUCC 14-0402 and CBS 195.79) were used as the outgroup. The tree topology of the ML analysis is similar to the Bayesian analysis. The best RaxML tree with a final likelihood value of −12077.017651 is presented. The matrix contained 622 distinct alignment patterns, with 26.22% of characters undetermined or missing. Estimated base frequencies were as follows: A = 0.243063, C = 0.249875, G = 0.264718, T = 0.242345; substitution rates AC = 1.293241, AG = 2.428649, AT = 1.255505, CG = 0.928677, CT = 6.755147, GT = 1.000000; gamma distribution shape parameter α = 0.133168. Multi-locus phylogenetic analyses show that our new isolates (KUMCC 21-0101A, KUMCC 21-0101B) are sister lineages to M. citri (GZCC21-0208, GZCC21-0212), with 99% MLBS/ 1.00 BYPP statistical support.

    • Dothideomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka

      Botryosphaeriales C.L. Schoch, Crous & Shoemaker

      Botryosphaeriaceae Theiss. & Syd.

      Botryosphaeria Ces. & De Not.

      Generally, Botryosphaeria is regarded as a species complex, owing to the high level of intraspecific variation among its isolates, which overlap with those of other related species, while morphological characteristics are no longer routinely employed for the identification[59,68,69]. Botryosphaeria species are known as plant saprobes, pathogens, and endophytes, with a global distribution across a wide variety of mainly woody hosts[68,70]. Diseases caused by pathogens belonging to the genus Botryosphaeria have resulted in significant losses in various economically important crops. To identify Botryosphaeria sp., it is recommended to provide ITS sequence data, combined with tef1 and tub2, which can effectively distinguish closely related species[71]. In our study, we introduced a new host record of B. dolichospermatii as a saprobe from Acer sp.

      Botryosphaeria dolichospermatii Z.P. Dou, W. He & Y. Zhang, in Dou, Zhao, He & Zhang, Mycosystema 40(3): 479 (2021)

      Index Fungorum number: IF 826937, Figs 1, 2

      Figure 1. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on ITS, LSU, tef1, and tub2 sequence data representing Botryosphaeria species. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 60% and BYPP values greater than 0.95 (the rounding of values to two decimal proportions) from BI analysis are labelled on the nodes. A newly generated sequence is in blue, and type species are bold.

      Figure 2. 

      Botryosphaeria dolichospermatii (KUN-HKAS 115560). (a), (b) Ascomata on host surface. (c) Vertical section of ascoma. (d) Peridium. (e) Pseudoparaphyses. (f)–(i) Asci. (j)–(m) Ascospores. (n) Germinated ascospore. Scale bars: (c) = 50 μm; (d), (f)–(i) = 20 μm; (e), (j)–(n) = 10 μm.

      Saprobic on dead branches of Acer sp. Sexual morph: Ascomata 125–165 μm high × 189 190–225 μm diam. ($\overline x $ = 147 × 197 μm, n = 10), eustromatic, gregarious, black, semi-immersed, becoming erumpent at maturity, uniloculate, glabrous, ostiolate, with minutely papillate. Peridium 20–30 μm wide, thick-walled, composed of several layers of thickened, dark-brown to black pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis or textura globosa, with hyaline cells towards the inner layers. Hamathecium 2–2.5 μm ($\overline x $ = 2.2 μm, n =20) wide, thin-walled, hyaline, septate, broadly cellular pseudoparaphyses, embedded in a hyaline gelatinous matrix. Asci 69–86 × 10–17 μm ($\overline x $ = 76 × 13 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, clavate to cylindric-clavate, short stipitate, thin at ectotunica rather thick at endotunica, 3-layered, with a prominent apical chamber, developing on a broad basal hymenial layer. Ascospores 17–22 × 5–7 μm ($\overline x $ = 20 × 6 μm, n = 20), irregularly 2-seriate in the ascus, hyaline, thin-walled, varied in shape, usually ovoid to fusoid or fusoid-ellipsoid, widest in the middle, straight or inequilateral, septate, with smooth or granular contents, sometimes guttulate, surrounded by a thin mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: See Chu et al.[59].

      Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinate on PDA within 24 h, and germ tubes are produced from both sides. Colonies grow fast on PDA, effuse, velvety to hairy, circular, white in the first week, and brown to dark brown after 1 week from above and below.

      Known host and distribution: On the cankered branch of Vaccinium uliginosum in Fujian, China[59]; on dead branches of Acer sp. in Yunnan, China (this study).

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on dead branches of Acer sp. (Sapindaceae), 15 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 48 (KUN-HKAS 115560, new host record), living culture KUMCC 21-0103.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0103: SSU: PV942129; ITS: PV873194; LSU: PV942116; tub2: PX055888.

      Notes: Our new collection morphologically resembles the type collection of Botryosphaeria described in Phillips et al.[72]. The new strain makes a weak independent clade and is closely related to B. dolichospermatii (CGMCC 3.19096T) in multigene phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 1). Botryosphaeria dolichospermatii was initially introduced as an asexual morph[59], while our new isolate is a sexual morph, and it fits well with the generic description of the sexual morph of Botryosphaeria[73]. The sexual morph of our sample is characterized by black, uniloculate, erumpent ascomata, resembling those of other Botryosphaeria species such as B. dothidea and B. rosaceae[71]. A comparison of LSU, ITS, tef1, and tub2 gene sequences between the new isolate and B. dolichospermatii (CGMCC 3.19096T) revealed no differences, except for two gaps in the ITS region within the areas analyzed in this study. Consequently, the new isolate is presented as the first recorded sexual morph and a new host record of B. dolichospermatii, supported by both morphological and phylogenetic similarities.

      Pleosporales Luttr. ex M.E. Barr

      Massarinaceae Munk

      Helminthosporium Link

      The type species of Helminthosporium, H. velutinum, is characterized by hyphomycetous with solitary, cylindrical, unbranched, brown conidiophores that produce obclavate, distoseptate conidia in integrated, terminal or intercalary, polytretic conidiogenous cells[74−77]. Most taxa in the Helminthosporium complex have later been placed in other genera, initially based on morphological characters and later based on molecular data, although the status of some species remained unresolved[78]. While a comprehensive study of the genus has been revised by Voglmayr & Jaklitsch[79], more than 225 species were listed in Helminthosporium[34,80,81]. In the present study, we collected H. velutinum from a branch of an unknown plant at the KIB, Yunnan, China, and this is the second strain that was reported from Yunnan Province, China.

      Helminthosporium velutinum Link [as 'Helmisporium'], Mag. Gesell. naturf. Freunde, Berlin 3(1–2): 10, tab. 1:9 (1809)

      Index Fungorum number: IF 250075, Figs 3, 4

      Figure 3. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on LSU, SSU, ITS, and tef1 sequence data. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP values greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis are labeled on the nodes. A newly generated sequence is in blue, and type species are bold.

      Figure 4. 

      Helminthosporium velutinum (KUN-HKAS 115606). (a), (b) Colonies on the substrate. (c) Conidiophores and conidia. (d), (e) Conidiogenesis. (f) Reverse view of culture on PDA. (g) Forward a few of the cultures in PDA. (h)–(l) Conidia. (m) Germinating conidium. Scale bars: (c)= 100 μm; (d), (e) = 50 μm; (h)–(m) = 20 μm.

      Saprobic on dead branches of an unknown plant species. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetes. Conidiophores mononematous, macronematous, mostly unbranched, percurrently proliferating from cut ends, dark brown, smooth, 321–340 μm long ($\overline x $ = 335 μm, n = 10), 8–10 μm wide ($\overline x $ = 9 μm, n = 10), 10–13-septate, bulbous at base, erect or flexuous tapering towards the apex, with cells towards the apex of the conidiophore guttulate, fertile. Conidiogenous cells polytretic, integrated, intercalary, terminal. Conidia 30–84 μm long ($\overline x $ = 64 μm, n = 20), 10–15 μm wide ($\overline x $ = 13 μm, n = 20), single, obclavate, pale brown to brown, 7–9-distoseptate, smooth, straight or curved, truncate at cicatrized base, dark brown, with apical cell paler than other cells, rostrate, guttulate. Conidial secession schizolytic.

      Culture characteristics: Colonies on PDA, after 7 d at 25 ˚C in dark grey to brown with watery substrate, effuse, velvety, margin grey to white, reverse dark brown with pale-brown margin.

      Known hosts and distribution: On the cankered branch of Acer campestre in Italy[79], on the leaves of Canna generalis in Taiwan, China[82], on the stem of Passiflora edulis in Australia[83], on the twigs of Ulex europaeus in Scotland (UK)[84], on dead fruit of Musa acuminata in Thailand[85], on decaying branches of an unidentified host in Sichuan, China[78], on submerged wood in streams in Yunnan, China[86], and on a branch of an unknown plant in Yunnan, China (this study).

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on dead branches of an unknown plant species, 17 July 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 146 (KUN-HKAS 115606), living culture KUMCC 21-0076.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0076: SSU: PV942134; ITS: PV873202; LSU: PV942124; tef1: PX055884.

      Notes: New strain (KUMCC 21-0076) clusters with the strains of Helminthosporium velutinum (MFLUCC 16-1096, CPC 26297, CGMCC 3.23572, and L131[epitype]) and makes sister lineage to MFLUCC 16-1096 with 96% MLBS/1.00 BYPP statistic support (Fig. 3). In a BLASTn search of the NCBI GenBank, the closest match of the ITS sequence of the new isolate (KUMCC 21-0076) with 100% similarity was H. velutinum strains (voucher 202107001, MFLUCC 16-1096, and MFLUCC 16-1300).

      Helminthosporium velutinum is found on a wide range of dead plant material, and it is cosmopolitan in distribution[78]. Our new isolate shares a similar morphology with the type strain of H. velutinum (L131) in having solitary, cylindrical, unbranched, brown conidiophores that produce obclavate, distoseptate conidia[74−77]. Based on morphology and the similarity of ITS sequences from various collections worldwide, we identified our isolates as H. velutinum. The species is primarily associated with dead plant material in terrestrial ecosystems worldwide[77,82−85]. Our new isolate is also from a branch of an unidentified plant species in Yunnan, China.

      Neohendersoniaceae A. Giraldo & Crous

      Neohendersonia Petr.

      Neohendersonia was introduced by Petrak[87] with N. pyriformis as the type species. However, Giraldo et al.[88] suggested that N. pyriformis should be considered synonymous with N. kickxii, a proposition later supported by subsequent literature; N. kickxii was proposed as the type species, being the older name[88−90]. Currently, there are five species accepted in the genus; only N. kickxii and N. tongrenensis have sequence data, and all species were reported only as coelomycetes[61,88]. In this study, we introduced a new species of this genus and its sexual morph.

      Neohendersonia camelliae Jayasiri, Tibpromma & Karun., sp. nov.

      Index Fungorum number: IF905408; Facesoffungi number: FoF 18867, Figs 5, 6

      Figure 5. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on SSU, LSU, and ITS sequence data representing Neohendersonia species. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis are labeled on the nodes. Strains of the newly described species are in blue, while type strains are in bold.

      Figure 6. 

      Neohendersonia camelliae (KUN-HKAS 115578, holotype). (a), (b) Ascomata on host surface. (c), (d) Vertical section of ascomata. (e) Peridium. (f) Ascus. (g) Asci embedded in narrowly cellular pseudoparaphyses. (h) Ascus with mature ascospores. (i) Germinated ascospores. (j)–(m) Ascospores (m): SEM. (n) Upper view on PDA. (o) Reverse view on PDA. Scale bars: (c), (d) = 100 μm; (e), (j)–(m) = 20 μm; (f)–(i) = 50 μm.

      Etymology: The specific epithet reflects the host genus, Camellia.

      Holotype: KUN-HKAS 115578

      Saprobic on dead branches of Camellia sp. and unknown plant species. Sexual morph: Ascomata 233–308 high × 210–307 μm diam. ($\overline x $ = 305 × 264 μm, n = 10) scattered, solitary, semi-immersed to immersed, globose to subglobose, uni-loculate, with a central ostiole. Ostiole 20–40 μm long, minutely papillate, with pore-like opening. Peridium 15–35 μm thick, thick-walled, of uniform thickness, 5–7 layered, outer layers brown to dark brown, inner layers hyaline, composed of pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium composed of numerous, septate, branched, long, hyaline 1.2–2.0 μm wide pseudoparaphyses anastomosing at the apex, embedded in a gelatinous matrix. Asci 150–210 × 20–37 μm ($\overline x $ = 184 × 30 μm, n = 20), 6–8-spored, sometimes 4-spored, bitunicate, fissitunicate, broadly cylindrical to cylindric-clavate, short pedicellate, sometimes with long pedicels, apically rounded, with an indistinct ocular chamber. Ascospores 35–47 × 10–16 μm ($\overline x $ = 42 × 14 μm, n = 30), 1–2-seriate, hyaline, becoming pale brown at maturity, broadly fusiform, smooth-walled, conical at both ends, 1-septate, with asymmetric cells, upper cell slightly larger than lower cell, with septum prominent when immature, with each cell containing a large and a small guttule, sheath when present 1.5–4 μm wide. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

      Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated within 12 h on PDA, colonies grown on PDA at room temperature (20–25 °C). Colonies are circular to irregular, dull, with wrinkled, yellow-green to brown aerial hyphae at the edge, dark green on the reverse, and produce a yellow-orange pigment on PDA.

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on dead branches of Camellia sp. (Theaceae), 08 June 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 80 (KUN-HKAS 115578, holotype), ex-type KUMCC 21-0056; ibid., on dead branches of an unidentified plant, 25 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 58 (KUN-HKAS 115566, paratype), ex-paratype KUMCC 21-0107.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0056: SSU: PV942132; ITS: PV873199; LSU: PV942121; tef1: PX055881; rpb2: PX055870. KUMCC 21-0107: SSU: PV948970; ITS: PV873197; LSU: PV942119; tef1: PX055879; rpb2: PX055868.

      Notes: Neohendersonia camelliae is introduced as a new species, mainly based on phylogenetic analyses of a combined SSU, ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1 dataset and nucleotide comparison. Neohendersonia camelliae clusters sister lineage with the strains of N. kickxii with low statistical support (Fig. 5). In a BLASTn search of NCBI GenBank, the closest match of the ITS sequence of the new isolates (KUMCC 21-0056 and KUMCC 21-0107) with 92.91% similarity was the type strain of N. kickxii (CBS 112403). The comparison of ITS sequence between N. camelliae (KUMCC 21-0056) and N. kickxii (CBS 112403) shows a 47 bp (including gaps) difference (9.1%). Thus, we introduced our isolate as a new species in accordance with the guidelines of Jeewon & Hyde[91]. In addition, we did not obtain the asexual morph in the culture. Therefore, a morphological comparison between our new species and Neohendersonia kickxii was not possible, as the latter has so far only been reported in its asexual morph[88]. Currently, five other species are known within the genus Neohendersonia[41,63,89,92]. Among other genera in the family Neohendersoniaceae, Neohendersonia camelliae shares a more similar morphology with the genus Crassiparies[93,94] than with Brevicollum and Medicopsis. The sexual morph of Crassiparies (C. quadrisporus) is characterized by scattered, immersed, subglobose ascomata with an ostiolar neck, thin ascomata wall with polygonal to rectangular cells, septate, branched, and anastomosed pseudoparaphyses; 4-spored, cylindrical to clavate, pedicellate asci, and hyaline, broadly fusiform, l-septate ascospores[93,94]. However, they are difficult to distinguish morphologically but can be well separated in phylogeny.

      Notably, all strains of Neohendersonia kickxii identified in Austria (CBS 122938, CBS 122941), Italy (CBS 112403), and Sweden (CBS 114276) were from Fagus spp. whereas our two new strains were isolated from Camellia sp. and dead branches of an unknown species in Yunnan, China.

      Teichosporaceae M.E. Barr

      Magnibotryascoma Thambug. & K.D. Hyde

      Thambugala et al.[95] introduced Magnibotryascoma to accommodate M. uniseriata (≡Misturatosphaeria uniseriata). Magnibotryascoma species have been reported as woody-based saprobes on Acer cappadocicum, Clematis vitalba, Machilus yunnanensis, Malus halliana, Ribes sanguineum, Robinia pseudoacacia, Salix sp., Shorea assamica, and Vaccinium myrtillus from Belgium, China, Germany, Norway, and the United Kingdom[62,96,97]. The sexual morph of this genus is characterized by solitary or aggregated ascomata, fissitunicate, cylindrical to cylindrical-clavate asci, and partially overlapping, brown to dark brown, fusiform to elliptical, 1–3-septate ascospores[95], while the asexual morph is characterized by pycnidial, uniloculate, semi-erumpent to superficial, subglobose to globose, dark brown to black conidiomata, multi-layered conidiomatal walls, enteroblastic, phialidic, integrated, truncate to cylindrical, hyaline conidiogenous cells, and hyaline to reddish-brown, aseptate conidia[34,97,98]. In a previous study, Jaklitsch et al.[96] synonymized this genus with Teichospora, but the morphological differences between the two genera are notable. Later, phylogenetic analyses by Hongsanan et al.[9] positioned Magnibotryascoma as a distinct lineage within Teichosporaceae, separate from Teichospora, thereby supporting its recognition as a distinct genus. Currently, eight species are accepted in this genus[41]. Morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses of combined ITS, LSU, SSU, and tef1-α sequence data revealed their taxonomic positions within Magnibotryascoma[34,98]. In this study, we found other M. mali from unidentified tree species in Yunnan, China.

      Magnibotryascoma mali Phukhams., Wanas. & K.D. Hyde 2017

      Index Fungorum number: IF553255; Facesoffungi number: FoF03387, Figs 7, 8

      Figure 7. 

      Phylogram generated from maximum likelihood analysis based on LSU, SSU, ITS, tef1, and rpb2 sequence data. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP equal to or greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis are labeled on the nodes. A newly generated sequence is in blue, and type strains are bold.

      Figure 8. 

      Magnibotryascoma mali (KUN-HKAS 115583). (a), (b) Conidiomata observed on the host surface. (c) Horizontal section of a conidioma. (d) Pycnidial wall. (e), (f) Conidiogenous cells. (g)–(i), (k), (l) Conidia; (k), (l) SEM photos. (j) Germinated conidium. Scale bars: (c) = 50 µm; (d) = 20 µm; (e)–(h) = 10 µm; (i), (k), (l) = 1 µm; (j) = 2 µm.

      Saprobic on dead branches of an unidentified tree species. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Coelomycetous. Conidiomata 147–182 μm high, 203–280 μm diam. ($\overline x $ = 165 × 247 μm, n = 5) pycnidial, solitary, aggregated, uniloculate, immersed, globose to subglobose, coriaceous, dark brown to brown, papillate, with a central ostiole. Pycnidial wall 10–23 μm wide, thick, 2-layered, with an outer layer composed of light brown to brown cells of textura angularis, lined with a hyaline innermost layer bearing conidiogenous cells. Conidiophores are reduced to conidiogenous cells. Conidiogenous cells 5.2–7.9 × 1.7–3 μm ($\overline x $ = 6.4 × 2 μm, n = 20), enteroblastic, annelledic, discrete, cylindrical to oblong, hyaline, arising from the inner layer of pycnidial wall. Conidia 3.2–4.3 × 1.9–2.6 μm ($\overline x $ = 4 × 2.2 μm, n = 30), subglobose, oval, guttulate, hyaline when immature, pale brown at maturity, aseptate, smooth-walled.

      Culture characteristics: Colonies grow on PDA at 20 °C. Colonies after 14 d dense, circular, slightly raised, rough surface, with curled or scalloped entire margin, radiated, with four layers in surface view (Fig. 8m), pale yellowish to brown at the margin, paler towards the center, separated by pale-grey to dark-grey concentric ring near the margin, with yellow pigment diffusing in the agars, and pale to dark brown in reverse.

      Known host and distribution: On decayed twigs of Malus halliana in Yunnan, China[99], on a dead branch of Metrosideros sp. in New Zealand[100], on dead branches of Osmanthus fragrans in Sichuan, China[101], on dead branches of unknown species in Yunnan, China (this study).

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on dead branches of unknown species, 09 June 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 93 (KUN-HKAS 115583), living culture KUMCC 21-0112.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0112: SSU: PV942133; ITS: PV873201; LSU: PV942123; tef1: PX055883; rpb2: PX055872.

      Notes: In multigene phylogenetic analyses, our new strain clustered with the strain of Magnibotryascoma mali (KUMCC 21-0516) with 100% MLBS/1.00 BYPP statistical support (Fig. 7). In the NCBI BLASTn search based on ITS sequence, the closest match of our new strain is M. mali (KUMCC 21-0516) with 100% similarity; tef1 sequence closest match with M. mali (GZAAS 23-0648) with 99.70% similarity; rpb2 sequence closest match with M. mali (MFLUCC 17-0933) with 98.58% similarity. Based on the phylogenetic tree, our strain clustered with M. mali (KUMCC 21-0516) while sister to the extype of M. mali (MFLUCC 17-0933) (Fig. 7). The morphology of our new strain matched the description by Ren et al.[62], and also matches with the holotype of M. mali (MFLU 17-0559), which was introduced from decayed twigs of Malus halliana (Rosaceae) in Yunnan, China[99].

      According to the phylogenetic tree of Ren et al.[62] and Chethana et al.[101], their isolates of M. mali are related to M. mali (MFLUCC 17-0933, ex-type) but do not group together with the results of our phylogenetic analyses. Our M. mali does not group with the ex-type of M. mali (MFLUCC 17-0933) (Fig. 7). Therefore, with this conspecific status, further taxonomic work is needed to resolve identification, phylogenetic position, and relationships between M. mali members.

      Sordariomycetes O.E. Erikss. & Winka

      Sordariomycetidae O.E. Erikss. & Winka

      Amphisphaeriales D. Hawksw. & O.E. Erikss.

      Apiosporaceae K.D. Hyde, J. Fröhl., Joanne E. Taylor & M.E. Barr

      Apiospora Sacc.

      The genus Apiospora was introduced by Saccardo[102], with A. montagnei as the type species. Members of this genus can survive as endophytes, saprobes, or pathogens, which have a wide range of distribution in different habitats such as animal tissues, seaweeds, and even oligotrophic environments (lichens, air, and soil)[103−105]. The genus was reported with both its sexual and asexual morphs. Sexual morphs are characterized by multi-locular stromata and 1-septate (near the lower cell) ascospores[106]. Asexual morphs were characterized by dark-brown conidia, with a longitudinal, transparent slit or hyaline conidiophores, basauxic conidiogenous cells, and pale-brown to brown conidia[104−107]. In this study, we collected known species A. yunnana as saprobic on dead bamboo culms in the KIB garden, and this is the third time that this species has been found on bamboo in China.

      Apiospora yunnana (D.Q. Dai & K.D. Hyde) Pintos & P. Alvarado, Fungal Systematics and Evolution 7: 207 (2021)

      Index Fungorum number: IF837739, Figs 9, 10

      Figure 9. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on ITS sequence data representing Apiospora. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP values greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis labelled on the nodes. A newly generated sequence is in blue, and ex-type strains are in bold.

      Figure 10. 

      Apiospora yunnana (HKAS 115564). (a), (b) Ascomata on host surface. (c) Vertical section of ascomata. (d) Peridium. (e) Paraphyses. (f), (g) Asci. (h)–(n) Ascospores; (l) ascospore with mucilaginous sheath in India ink; (m), (n) SEM photos. (o) Upper view on PDA. (p) Reverse view on PDA. (q) Germinated ascospore. Scale bars: (c) = 100 µm; (d), (l) = 20 cm; (e), (h)–(k), (m), (n), (q) = 10 µm; (f), (g) = 30 µm; (o), (p) = 2 cm.

      ≡ Arthrinium yunnanum D.Q. Dai & K.D. Hyde, in Dai, Phookamsak, Wijayawardene, Li, Bhat, Xu, Taylor, Hyde & Chukeatirote, Fungal Diversity 82: 69 (2016)

      Saprobic on dead bamboo culms. Sexual morph: Ascostromata 0.6–1.2 mm long, 0.4–0.6 mm wide, 0.2–0.3 mm high, solitary, or occasionally with two, gregarious, immersed, subepidermal, fusiform to ellipsoid, black, with a long-slit opening at the top. Ascomata 126–150 μm diam. × 123–183 μm high in section, peritheciod, subglobose, light brown to dark brown, with a distinct ostiole at the centre, crowned by a black clypeus. Peridium laterally 30–46 μm thick, composed of brown and small light brown to reddish brown to hyaline elongated cells of textura angularis, surrounded by 100–300 μm stromatic tissues, composed of small cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium composed of dense, 3–5 μm broad, septate, unbranched, paraphyses. Asci 85–92 × 17–25 μm ($\overline x $ = 88 × 21 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, broadly cylindrical to subglobose, with a narrow apex. Ascospores 26–32 × 9–11 μm ($\overline x $ = 29 × 10 μm, n = 20), 2–3-seriate, asymmetrically 1-septate, apiospored, elliptical, with a large, curved, upper cell and small lower cell, narrowly rounded at ends, hyaline, smooth-walled, with many guttules, surrounded by a 5–10 μm wide gelatinous sheath. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

      Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinate on PDA within 24 h, and germ tubes develop from the upper part. Colonies fast growing on PDA at 25 °C, sparse, circular, with irregular edges, flattened, hairy to feathery, white from above, brown to dark brown in the centre from below. Mycelium is superficial to immersed in medium, with branched, septate, smooth hyphae.

      Known host and distribution: On dead culms of Phyllostachys nigra in Yunnan, China[106], on decaying culms of Phyllostachys heteroclada in Sichuan, China[108], on dead culms of bamboo (Poaceae) in Yunnan, China (this study).

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on dead culms of bamboo (Poaceae), 15 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 55 (KUN-HKAS 115564), living culture KUMCC 21-0047.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0047: SSU: PV942130; ITS: PV873195; LSU: PV942117; tub2: PX055889.

      Notes: Apiospora yunnana was described by Dai et al.[106] based on a specimen collected in Yunnan Province, China. This species occurred on dead culms of Phyllostachys nigra (black bamboo, Poaceae)[106]. Our new strain (KUMCC 21-0047) groups within the type strain of A. yunnana, with statistical support 97% MLBS/1.00 BYPP (Fig. 9). The new collection has similar ascospore, ascus, and ascocarp morphology to the type strain. Therefore, the strain collected from the same place and host group (bamboo) is assigned to A. yunnana.

      Chaetosphaeriales Huhndorf, A.N. Mill. & F.A. Fernández

      Chaetosphaeriaceae Réblová, M.E. Barr & Samuels

      Pseudolachnella Teng

      Pseudolachnella, a genus segregated from Pseudolachnea, was established to accommodate species with multiseptate conidia, with P. scolecospora as the type species[109]. Under the genus Pseudolachnella, 23 species are accepted, and for many of them, ITS, LSU, and tef1 sequences are available[42,65]. Members of this genus have been reported only as asexual morphs and characterized by stromatic, acervular, setose conidiomata with marginal setae, phialidic conidiogenous cells, and conidia with single to multiple appendages at each end[110,111]. Dead bamboo substrates from China, India, and Japan are common hosts for this genus[111,112]. In this study, we introduce the sexual morph of P. tengii, the first for this genus.

      Pseudolachnella tengii W.P. Wu & Y.Z. Diao, Fungal Diversity 116: 501 (2022)

      Index Fungorum Number: IF841674, Figs 11, 12

      Figure 11. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on LSU, ITS, and tef1 sequence data representing Pseudolachnella and its relatives. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP values equal to or greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis are labelled on the nodes. A newly generated sequence is in blue, and ex-type strains are in bold.

      Figure 12. 

      Pseudolachnella tengii (KUN-HKAS 115565). (a)–(c) Ascomata on host surface. (d) Paraphyses. (e) Vertical section of ascoma. (f)–(i) Asci. (j) Peridium. (k)–(p) Ascospores; (n)–(p) SEM photos. (q) Germinated ascospore. (r) Upper view on PDA. (s) Reverse view on PDA. Scale bars: (d) = 10 µm; (e) = 100 cm; (f)–(j) = 20 µm; (k)–(q) = 10 µm; (r), (s) = 2 cm.

      Saprobic on a dead branch of a liana. Sexual morph: Ascomata 432–441 × 420–445 μm, scattered, solitary, immersed, irregular in shape, globose to subglobose, uniloculate, with a short central ostiole. Peridium 15–35 μm thick, thin-walled, of equal thickness, composed of 5–7 layers of flattened, dark brown, pseudoparenchymatous cells of textura angularis, with paler brown to hyaline towards the inner layer. Hamathecium 1.2–2.0 μm wide, filamentous, septate, branched, long, hyaline paraphyses. Asci 150–210 × 20–37 μm ($\overline x $ = 184 × 30 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, cylindrical to clavate, short pedicellate, sometimes with long pedicels, apical rounded, with a J- ring. Ascospores 35–47 × 10–16 μm ($\overline x $ = 42 × 14 μm, n = 30), 1–2-seriate, hyaline when young, becoming dark brown when mature, broadly fusiform, with rounded to acute ends, smooth-walled, muriform, with asymmetric cells, with septa becoming prominent when mature, 5–10-transverse and 2–4–8-longitudinal septum, surrounded by a thin, inconspicuous, mucilaginous sheath. Asexual morph: See Wu & Diao[64].

      Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinated within 12 h on PDA, colonies grown on PDA at room temperature (20–25 °C). Colonies circular to irregular, dull surface and wrinkled, yellow to dark brown, dark brown on the reverse, producing a yellow-orange pigment on PDA.

      Known host and distribution: On the dead culm of Phyllostachys sp. in Yunnan, China[64], on a dead branch of a liana in Yunnan, China (this study).

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on a dead branch of a liana, 26 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 56 (KUN-HKAS 115565), living culture KUMCC 21-0048.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0048: ITS: PV873196; LSU: PV942118; tef1: PX055878; rpb2: PX055867.

      Notes: In the phylogenetic analysis, the new isolate formed a sister group with Pseudolachnella tengii (NN047882T), with 100% MLBS and 1.00 BYPP statistical support (Fig. 11). Pseudolachnella tengii was introduced as an asexual morph, and the genus Pseudolachnella comprised only asexual morph species[64,110]. Therefore, morphological comparison is impossible as our new isolate is a sexual morph. As well, we are unsuccessful in getting the asexual morph from the culture. Based on nucleotide comparisons between our isolates and P. tengii (NN047882T), the ITS and LSU sequences are identical, while tef1 and rpb2 are available for P. tengii (NN047882T). In this study, we introduced the new isolate as the sexual morph of P. tengii, and both the holotype (HMAS 352045)[64] and our new isolate (HKAS 115565) were collected from the KIB in Kunming, Yunnan, China.

      Distoseptisporales Z.L. Luo, H.Y. Su & K.D. Hyde

      Distoseptisporaceae K.D. Hyde & McKenzie

      Distoseptispora K.D. Hyde, McKenzie & Maharachch

      The genus Distoseptispora is one of the Sporidesmium-like genera introduced by Su et al.[113], with the type species, D. fluminicola, isolated from decaying wood in Yunnan, China. Distoseptispora, as a single genus within Distoseptisporaceae, occurs mainly as asexual morphs, while only two species have been reported as sexual morphs, viz. D. hyalina and D. licualae[114,115]. Species of this genus were found forming effuse, hairy colonies on decaying wood, plant stems, bamboo culms, and fallen leaves and shafts in terrestrial and freshwater habitats, mostly reported from Asia (mainly in China and Thailand)[31,116−119]. Furthermore, members of this genus show macronematous, mononematous, septate, unbranched, cylindrical, olivaceous to brown conidiophores; mono- or polyblastic, integrated, terminal, cylindrical, determinate, or percurrently extending conidiogenous cells; and acrogenous, solitary, smooth or verruculose, euseptate or distoseptate conidia[31]. In this study, we found known species of Distoseptispora (D. guizhouensis) from an unidentified plant in the KIB garden.

      Distoseptispora guizhouensis X. Tang, Jayaward., J.C. Kang & K.D. Hyde, in Hyde et al., Mycosphere 12(1): 1126 (2021)

      Index Fungorum number: IF558532, Figs 13, 14

      Figure 13. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on ITS, LSU, tef1, and rpb2 sequence data representing Distoseptispora species. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP values equal to or greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis are labelled on the nodes. A newly generated sequence is in blue, and type species are in bold.

      Figure 14. 

      Distoseptispora guizhouensis (KUN-HKAS 115537). (a) Colonies on host surface. (b) Germinated conidium. (c)–(e) Conidiophores, conidiogenous, and developing conidia. (f)–(j) Conidia. (k) Colony on PDA. (l)–(n) SEM photographs of conidiogenous cells and conidia. Scale bars: (b)–(e), (l), (m) = 10 μm; (f)–(j), (n) = 20 μm.

      Saprobic on decaying branch of an unidentified plant. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Hyphomycetous. Colonies on wood effuse, hairy, dark brown, scattered or in small groups, glistening, usually setiform. Mycelium is partly immersed, partly superficial, composed of septate, smooth-walled, pale-brown to hyaline hyphae. Conidiophores 21–44 × 3.8–4.9 μm ($\overline x $ = 32 × 4.2 μm, n = 30), macronematous, mononematous, erect, solitary or caespitose, straight or flexuous, cylindrical, percurrently proliferating, rounded at apex, smooth-walled, septate, unbranched, greyish brown. Conidiogenous cells monoblastic, integrated, terminal, determinate, cylindrical, brown, rounded, and darkened at the apex. Conidia 73–184 × 10–19 μm ($\overline x $ = 104 × 13 μm, n = 20), acrogenous, obclavate, rostrate, 12–31-distoseptate, brown to dark brown, usually paler towards the apex, rounded at apex, with a truncated base, faintly to heavily pigmented at the basal scar.

      Culture characteristics: Conidia germinate on PDA within 24 h, and germ tubes are produced from both ends. Colonies growing on PDA, slow growing after 1 month at 25 °C in natural light; circular, with dense, three-layered (forward grey, white, and grey, respectively), and a dark-brown margin. In reverse, dark brown to black with a smooth margin.

      Known host and distribution: Decaying wood in Guizhou[61] and Yunnan, China (this study).

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, decaying branch of unknown plant, 6 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST03 (KUN-HKAS 115537); living culture KUMCC 21-0039.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0039: SSU: PV948969; ITS: PV873190; LSU: PV951539; tef1: PX055874; rpb2: PX055863.

      Notes: Our new isolate is well supported together with Distoseptispora guizhouensis (GZCC 21-0666T) (100% MLBS/ 1.00 BYPP, Fig. 13). Also, it shares similar morphology with the holotype of D. guizhouensis (GZAAS21-0381) in having macronematous, mononematous, erect, cylindrical conidiophores, monoblastic, integrated, terminal, determinate, cylindrical, brown conidiogenous cells, and acrogenous, obclavate, distoseptate, brown to dark-brown conidia[61]. Conidiophore and conidia sizes of our new isolate (KUN-HKAS 115537) and holotype (GZAAS21-0381[61]) are shown with the conidiophore overlap size (21–44 × 3.8–4.9 μm vs 21–50 × 4–9 μm), but the holotype conidia are bigger than our isolate (73–184 × 10–19 μm vs 90–273 × 15–21). Based on nucleotide comparisons, two base pairs differ in the ITS region between our isolates and D. guizhouensis (GZCC 21-0666, ex-type), whereas the LSU and tef1 sequences are identical. Here, we report the new collection of D. guizhouensis in Yunnan, China, accompanied by SEM photographs of its conidia for the first time. However, the species name was corrected in the original as D. guizhouensis, but in Index Fungorum and MycoBank, it was recorded as D. guizhounesis. Therefore, it will need to be corrected in the future.

      Xylariales Nannf.

      Diatrypaceae Nitschke

      Peroneutypa Berl.

      Peroneutypa is characterized by long, prominent necks, with small, truncate apices, urn-shaped asci, and allantoid ascospores[120−122]. Li et al.[123] accepted Peroneutypa with 27 species, but approximately 76 epithets are listed in Index Fungorum[41]. Members of Peroneutypa are saprobes or pathogens and are widely distributed in terrestrial and marine habitats[124−128]. In our study, we identified the known species Peroneutypa (P. scoparia) using morphological and phylogenetic data. In addition, this is the first time P. scoparia has been found on Trachycarpus sp. in Yunnan Province, China.

      Peroneutypa scoparia (Schwein.) Carmarán & A.I. Romero

      Index Fungorum number: IF500713; Facesoffungi number: FoF 01998, Figs 15, 16

      Figure 15. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on ITS and tub2 sequence data representing Peroneutypa. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP values equal to or greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis are labeled on the nodes. The newly generated sequences are in blue, and the type species and the reference specimens are in bold.

      Figure 16. 

      Peroneutypa scoparia (HKAS 115568). (a), (b) Ascomata on host surface. (c) Vertical section of ascoma. (d) Peridium. (e)–(g) Asci (stained with Congo red). (h) Paraphyses (stained with Congo red). (i), (j) Ascospores; (j) SEM photo. (k) Germinated ascospore. (l) Upper view on PDA. (m) Reverse view on PDA. Scale bars: (a) = 500 µm; (c) = 50 µm; (d) = 10 cm; (e)–(i), (k) = 5 µm, (j) = 2 µm; (l), (m) = 2 cm.

      Synonyms:

      =Sphaeria scoparia Schwein.

      =Valsa scoparia (Schwein.) M.A. Curtis.

      =Eutypella scoparia (Schwein.) Ellis & Everh.

      =Peroneutypella scoparia (Schwein.) Berl.

      =Eutypa scoparia (Schwein.) L.C. Tiffany & J.C. Gilman.

      =Valsa ceratophora sensu Cooke.

      =Valsa heteracantha Sacc.

      =Eutypa heteracantha (Sacc.) Sacc.

      =Engizostoma heteracanthum (Sacc.) Kuntze.

      =Peroneutypa heteracantha (Sacc.) Berl.

      =Peroneutypella heteracantha (Sacc.) Rehm.

      =Peroneutypella heteracantha f. berberidis Rehm.

      =Peroneutypa heteracantha f. arundinis-donacis Speg.

      =Peroneutypa heteracantha f. ricini-communis Speg.

      =Peroneutypa heteracantha f. casuarinae-strictae Speg.

      =Peroneutypa heteracantha f. annonae-cherimoliae Speg.

      Saprobic on dead petioles of Trachycarpus sp. Sexual morph: Ascomata perithecial, 350–450 μm diam., 150–170 μm high ($\overline x $ = 421 × 162 μm, n = 10), solitary to 2- or 3-grouped, gregarious, immersed in the cortex, globose to subglobose, dark brown to black, coriaceous, becoming raised to erumpent by a long ostiolar canal. Ostiolar canal 130–180 μm long, 48–60 μm wide ($\overline x $ = 156 × 52 μm, n = 10), dark brown to black, glabrous, circular to irregular in shape, arranged longitudinally, periphysate. Peridium 15–31 μm thick, composed of two sections of layers, with the outer section comprising 3–5 layers of relatively small, brown to dark-brown thick-walled cells, arranged in textura angularis, and the inner part comprising 3–5 layers of hyaline cells of textura angularis. Hamathecium composed of 2.7–3.8 μm wide, dense, cylindrical, septate, hyaline paraphyses, slightly swollen at the septa. Asci 21–41 × 4–6 μm ($\overline x $ = 33 × 5 μm, n = 20), 8-spored, unitunicate, clavate to cylindro-clavate, apically rounded to truncate, J- apical ring, with a 15–20 μm long pedicel. Ascospores 4–5 × 1–2 μm ($\overline x $ = 4.1 × 1.4 μm, n = 30), 2–3-seriate to irregularly arranged, allantoid, hyaline, rounded at both ends, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: See Shang et al.[129].

      Culture characteristics: Ascospores germinate on PDA within 24 h, and germ tubes are produced from both ends. Colonies after 1 week white, cottony, with ropy hyphal strands near the centre with diffuse margins; reverse coloration pale yellow; after 1 month, grey to dark-brown radial strands of aerial hyphae, reverse yellow to brown.

      Known host and distribution with molecular data: on leaves of Garcinia dulcis from Songkhla, Thailand[105], on dead culms of bamboo and on dead wood of Dalbergia cana, Microcos paniculate, and Afzelia xylocarpa from Chiang Rai, Thailand[130,131], on living branches of Broussonetia papyrifera from Argentina[7], on unknown bark from Chiang Mai, Thailand[129], on diseased dieback marine wood from Phetchaburi, Thailand[132], and on dead petioles of Trachycarpus sp. and unknown plants from Yunnan, China (this study).

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on dead petioles of Trachycarpus sp. (Arecaceae), 28 June 2020, Tibpromma, ST 63 (KUN-HKAS 115568), living culture KUMCC 21-0049; ibid., on dead branches of an unidentified plant, 1 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 40 (KUN-HKAS 115766), living culture KUMCC 21-0100.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0049: SSU: PV942131; ITS: PV873198; LSU: PV942120; tef1: PX055880; tub2: PX055890; rpb2: PX055869. KUMCC 21-0100: SSU: PV942127; ITS: PV873192; LSU: PV942114; tef1: PX055876; tub2: PX055886; rpb2: PX055865.

      Notes: Phylogenetic analyses of a combined ITS and tub2 sequence dataset showed that our strains (KUMCC 21-0049 and KUMCC 21-0100) cluster with Peroneutypa scoparia (MFLUCC 11-0478) with 70% MLBS statistical support (Fig. 15). Our sample differs slightly from P. scoparia (MFLU 15–1183, reference specimen) by having a relatively small ostiolar canal (130–180 × 48–60 μm vs 195–530 × 330–720 μm). Therefore, the combined ITS-tub2 phylogeny and morphological features support our isolates as P. scoparia. In addition, this is the first time P. scoparia has been found in China, and the first time SEM images of its ascospores have been provided.

      Sordariomycetes genera incertae sedis

      Melanographium Sacc.

      This genus, typified by M. selenioides[133], is characterized by dark and unbranched conidiophores generally arising in a group from an immersed stroma with polyblastic conidiogenous cells and sympodial proliferation[134−136]. Conidia are pigmented, single-celled, frequently reniform in shape, and often with a hyaline germ slit[134−136]. Species are distinguished by the length of the conidiophores, the pattern of conidiophore grouping (single, synnemata, loosely or dense fascicles), conidial shape (straight, curved, or strongly curved), and conidial size[136]. In the Index Fungorum[41], 19 species have been recorded, but only a few species have molecular data. In this study, we introduce a new species based on both molecular and morphological data.

      Melanographium trachycarpi Jayasiri, Tibpromma & Karun., sp. nov.

      Index Fungorum number: IF905409; Facesoffungi number: FoF 18869, Figs 17, 18

      Figure 17. 

      Phylogram generated from Maximum Likelihood analysis based on LSU, ITS, and rpb2 sequence data representing Melanographium and closely related genera. Bootstrap values for ML equal to or greater than 70% and BYPP values equal to or greater than 0.95 (rounded to two decimal places) from the BI analysis are labelled on the nodes. The newly generated sequences are in blue, and type species are in bold.

      Figure 18. 

      Melanographium trachycarpi (KUN-HKAS 115558, holotype). (a), (b) Colonies on the host surface. (c)–(e) Conidiophores. (f)–(k) Conidia; (i)–(k) SEM photos. (l) Germinated conidiophore. (m) Upper view on PDA. (n) Reverse view on PDA. Scale bars: (c), (d), (e) = 100 µm; (f)–(h), (l) = 10 cm; (i)–(k) = 5 µm; (m), (n) = 2 cm.

      Etymology: The specific epithet 'trachycarpi' refers to the host plant genus, Trachycarpus.

      Holotype: KUN-HKAS 115558

      Saprobic on dead petioles of Trachycarpus sp. Sexual morph: Undetermined. Asexual morph: Colonies on natural substrate superficial, effuse, velvety, tufted, dark brown. Mycelium immersed, composed of branched, septate, smooth, brown hyphae. Conidiophores 115–268 × 2.7–5.6 μm ($\overline x $ = 220 × 5 μm, n = 20), macronematous, loosely or densely fasciculate, panicle or tufted, unbranched, multiseptate, straight below, slightly flexuous above, geniculate near the apex, brown to dark brown below, brown to pale brown towards the apex, subhyaline at the tip, thick-walled, rarely with percurrent proliferations. Conidiogenous cells are polyblastic, integrated, terminal, sympodial, cylindrical, or slightly clavate, with minutely protruding conidiogenous scars. Conidia 14–19 × 7.6–10.5 μm ($\overline x $ = 17 × 9 μm, n = 50), holoblastic, acropleurogenous, solitary, reniform or broad obovoid to semicircular, slightly curved, olivaceous brown to dark brown, aseptate, without germ-slit, verrucose or smooth-walled. Conidial secession schizolytic.

      Culture characteristics: Conidiophore germinated on PDA, colony circular, flossy, velvety. Colonies after 2 weeks yellow green to green brown, flossy, velvety, entire edge, flat; reverse coloration brown to black.

      Material examined: China, Yunnan, Kunming, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Science, on dead petioles of Trachycarpus sp. (Arecaceae), 15 May 2020, S. Tibpromma, ST 45 (KUN-HKAS 115558, holotype), ex-type living culture KUMCC 21-0101.

      GenBank accession numbers: KUMCC 21-0101: SSU: PV942128; ITS: PV873193; LSU: PV942115; tef1: PX055877; tub2: PX055887; rpb2: PX055866.

      Notes: Melanographium trachycarpi was found on dead branches of Trachycarpus sp. Melanographium trachycarpi shares common characteristics with other Melanographium species, including effused and tufted colonies, loosely or densely fasciculate conidiophores, and reniform, aseptate, darkly pigmented conidia[96−99,101,102]. Phylogenetically, M. trachycarpi is a sister lineage with two strains of M. citri (GZCC21-0208T, GZCC21-0212) with 99% MLBS/1.00 BYPP statistical support (Fig. 17). However, M. trachycarpi (KUN-HKAS 115558) differs from M. citri (HKAS 115665, reference specimen) by having short conidiophores (115–268 μm long, 2.7–5.6 μm) with olivaceous-brown to dark-brown conidia, reniform or broad obovoid to semicircular and lacking a germ-slit, while M. citri has long conidiophores (130–880 μm long, 20–140 μm) with pale to dark-brown conidia, which are curved, reniform or elliptical, sometimes obovoid, with a subhyaline longitudinal germ-slit[137]. We therefore recognize our collection as a new species, namely M. trachycarpi.

    • At the KIB, there are over 8,000 plant species in the garden, showcasing rich biodiversity[138]. Due to the high diversity of plant species, soil types, and often varied organic inputs, these environments support a wide range of fungi. In a previous study, several fungi were identified and introduced as new or known species, mostly found as saprobic fungi (Table 1[139]). As KIB's garden is a managed garden, containing diverse plant species often harbors beneficial saprobic fungi. Saprobic fungi are well known as decomposers of diverse plant litter, wood, and organic debris. Several hosts and fungi exhibit patterns that are generally non-random, influenced by evolutionary history, ecological specialization, and specific environmental factors. While some fungi are generalists, many form highly specialized relationships with specific host plants, especially within mycorrhizal networks (beneficial) and pathogenic (disease-causing) groups[140−142]. This research study makes a significant contribution to the understanding of fungal diversity by describing two new species previously unreported and seven new host records, highlighting the rich fungal diversity at the KIB, Yunnan, China. These findings are the result of detailed morphological observations combined with multigene phylogenetic analyses (SSU, ITS, LSU, rpb2, tef1, and tub2), confirming the novelty and taxonomic placement of these taxa. Besides introducing them based on morphology and DNA sequences, this study presents SEM photographs of some species for the first time and provides a checklist of fungi from KIB for the years 2010–2025, which may help other researchers interested in fungi at the KIB (Table 1).

      Table 1.  Checklist of fungi collected from KIB (from 2010–2025).

      Species name New taxa/
      known taxa
      Host/substrate Life mode Ref.
      Ascomycota
      Alternaria alternata Known Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Arthrinium yunnanum New Phyllostachys nigra Saprobic Dai et al.[106]
      Austropleospora keteleeriae New Keteleeria fortunei Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Bartalinia kunmingensis New Zea mays Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Brunneofusispora sinensis Known Magnolia denudata Saprobic Wanasinghe et al.[139]
      Brunneomurispora lonicerae New Lonicera maackii Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Camporesiomyces mali New Malus halliana Saprobic Hyde et al.[144]
      Ceratosphaeria yunnanensis New Heteropanox fregans Saprobic Manawasinghe et al.[151]
      Cladosporium cladosporioides Known Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Diatrypella yunnanensis New Unidentified plant Saprobic Hyde et al.[144]
      Diatrypella yunnanensis New Unidentified plant Saprobic Hyde et al.[144]
      Didymella coffeae-arabicae Known Leucaena sp. Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Didymella magnoliae New Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Diplodia magnoliigena New Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Hysterobrevium constrictum Known Unidentified plant Saprobic Hyde et al.[144]
      Keissleriella caraganae New Caragana arborescens Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Liua muriformis New Lonicera maackii Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Lonicericola hyaloseptispora New Lonicera maackii Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Montagnula aquilariae Known Unidentified plant Saprobic Wanasinghe et al.[152]
      Montagnula thevetiae New Thevetia peruviana Saprobic Wanasinghe et al.[152]
      Murilentithecium lonicerae New Lonicera maackii Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Neofusicoccum parvum Known Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Neoleptosporella camporesiana New Heteropanax fragrans Saprobic Manawasinghe et al.[151]
      Neosetophoma lonicerae New Lonicera maackii Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Nigrograna magnoliae New Magnolia denudata Saprobic Wanasinghe et al.[152]
      Nothophoma quercina Known Keteleeria fortunei Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Paratrimmatostroma kunmingensis New Fern Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Paucispora kunmingense New Malus halliana (Rosaceae) Saprobic Hyde et al.[153]
      Periconia byssoides Known Prunus armeniaca Saprobic Yang et al.[154]
      Periconia byssoides Known Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Periconia chimonanthi New Chimonanthi praecox Saprobic Yang et al.[154]
      Periconia cortaderiae Known Caragana arborescens Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Periconia kunmingensis New Fern Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[155]
      Phaeopoacea muriformis New unidentified grass species Saprobic Hyde et al.[153]
      Phaeosphaeria chinensis New Wisteria sp. Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Phaeoseptum mali New Malus halliana Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[156]
      Phaeosphaeria cycadis New Cycas sp. Leaf spots Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Phaeosphaeriopsis aloes Known Yucca elephantipes Saprobic Boonmee et al.[157]
      Phragmocamarosporium hederae Known Cycas Leaf spots Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Plectosphaerella kunmingensis New Water agar as a contaminated fungus Unknown Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Plenodomus artemisiae New Artemisia sp. Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Pseudolachnella tengii New Phyllostachys sp. Saprobic Wu & Diao[64]
      Pleurotheciella dimorphospora New Malus sp. Saprobic Boonmee et al.[157]
      Pseudochaetosphaeronema kunmingense New Cerasus pseudocerasus Saprobic Hyde et al.[144]
      Pseudopithomyces chartarum Known Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Pseudopithomyces kunmingensis New unidentified grass species Saprobic Abreu et al.[153]
      Rhytidhysteron camporesii New Unidentified plant Saprobic Hyde et al.[144]
      Sclerostagonospora rosae New Rosa sp. Saprobic Wanasinghe et al.[158]
      Septoriella neomuriformis New unidentified grass Saprobic Wanasinghe & Mharachchikumbura[159]
      Shearia formosa Known Magnolia denudata Saprobic Wanasinghe et al.[139]
      Sparticola muriformis New unidentified grass Saprobic Karunarathna et al.[160]
      Sphaerellopsis paraphysata Known Liriope spicata Rust on living leaves Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Stagonosporopsis pini New Pinus sp. Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Stomiopeltis chinensis New Harpephyllum sp. Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Tetraploa bambusae New Bamboo Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[161]
      Thyronectria kunmingensis New unidentified plant Saprobic Tun et al.[162]
      Torula ficus Known Magnolia grandiflora Saprobic Jayasiri et al.[149]
      Torula gaodangensis Known Malus sp. Saprobic Hyde et al.[144]
      Torula mackenziei Known Unidentified plant Saprobic Boonmee et al.[157]
      Vaginatispora fuckelii Known Rosa sp. Saprobic Hyde et al.[153]
      Wojnowiciella kunmingensis New Lonicera maackii Saprobic Phookamsak et al.[150]
      Basidiomycota
      Amanita cingulata New - Liu et al.[163]
      Amanita exitialis New Soil in forests dominated by Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita flavipes Known On soil in woodland Cai et al.[165]
      Amanita fuliginea Known On soil in forests dominated by Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita fuligineoides Known On soil in forests dominated by Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita griseorosea New Forests of Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita manginiana Known - Cai et al.[165]
      Amanita molliuscula New On soil under trees of Pinus and Quercus Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita pallidorosea Known On soil in forests of Pinaceae and Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita parviexitialis New Forests dominated by Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita pseudoporphyria Known In woodland of Coniferae Cai et al.[165]
      Amanita rimosa Known Soil in forests dominated by Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita sp. (Phalloideae) - Cai et al.[165]
      Amanita subfuliginea New On soil in forests of Fagaceae and Pinus Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita subpallidorosea Known On soil in forests dominated by Quercus and Cyclobalanopsis Cai et al.[164]
      Amanita virosa Known On soil in forests of Pinaceae and Fagaceae Cai et al.[164]
      Apiculospora spartii Known delete (new host and geographical record) Dead leaves of Yucca gigantea Saprobic Wijayawardene et al.[166]
      Cantharellus phloginus New On soil, associated with Castanopsis and Pinus Shao et al.[167]
      Cantharellus vaginatus New Under mixed forest dominated by Castanopsis and Pinus Shao et al.[168]
      Cantharellus zangii New On ground in subalpine mixed forests dominated by Larix potaninii var. macrocarpa, and Picea likiangensis Tian et al.[169]
      Chiua angusticystidiata New On soil Wu et al.[170]
      Chiua olivaceoreticulata New On soil Wu et al.[170]
      Chiua virens New combinations - Wu et al.[170]
      Chiua viridula New On soil Wu et al.[170]
      Cibaomyces glutinis New On buried rotten wood in broad-leaved forests dominated by Fagaceae Hao et al.[171]
      Cyptotrama glabra New On rotten wood of broad-leaved trees Qin & Yang[172]
      Flammulina velutipes var. filiformis New On base of dead trunk Saprobic Ge et al.[173]
      Flammulina velutipes var. himalayana New On base of dead trunk of Betulaceae Saprobic Ge et al.[173]
      Flammulina yunnanensis New On dead trunk of Lithocarpus or Quercus Ge et al.[174]
      Hymenoboletus filiformis New On soil, associated with Lithocarpus and Castanopsis Li & Yang[175]
      Hymenoboletus griseoviridis New On soil, associated with Fagaceae Li & Yang[175]
      Hymenoboletus jiangxiensis New On soil, associated with Fagaceae Li & Yang[175]
      Hymenoboletus luteopurpureus New On soil Wu et al.[170]
      Paraxerula ellipsospora New In forests dominated by Pinus Qin et al.[176]
      Physalacria corneri New On rotten trunk of broad-leaved trees Qin & Yang[172]
      Physalacria lacrymispora New On dead culm of Chimonobambusa Saprobic Qin & Yang[172]
      Physalacria sinensis New On rotten wood of Quercus variabilis Qin & Yang[172]
      Pseudolepiota zangmui New In mixed broadleaved forest of Fagaceae Ge & Yang[177]
      Rhodotus asperior New On dead trunk in forest dominated by Castanopsis and Lithocarpus Tang et al.[178]
      Suillus alpinus New On ground under Larix potaninii Shi et al.[179]
      Tuber baoshanense New - Wan et al.[180]
      Tuber calosporum New In soil under mixed forest with Pinus yunnanensis Wan et al.[181]
      Tuber polymorphosporum New In soil Wan et al.[180]
      Tuber shidianense New In humus soil under mixed forest with Pinus yunnanensis Wan et al.[181]
      Tuber sinoniveum New In humus soil under Pinus armandii Xu et al.[182]
      Tylocinum griseolum New On soil Wu et al.[170]
      Zangia chlorinosma New combinations - Li &Yang[175]
      Zangia erythrocephala New In mixed forests of Picea, Pinus, and Quercus aquifolioides Li &Yang[175]
      Zangia olivacea New In mixed forests of Picea, Pinus densata, and Quercus semicarpifolia Li &Yang[175]
      Zangia olivaceobrunnea New In mixed forests of Keteleeria, Pinus yunnanensis, and Quercus variabilis Li &Yang[175]
      Zangia roseola New combinations Pinus yunnanensis Li &Yang[175]
      Remark: all taxa were kept the same name when they were introduced.

      In this study, we introduced Melanographium trachycarpi as a new species; our new species shares common features with other Melanographium species, including effused and tufted colonies, loosely or densely fasciculate conidiophores, and reniform, aseptate, darkly pigmented conidia[133−136,143,144]. Since no sequence data are available for several Melanographium species, we used the keys to Melanographium species from previous studies to identify our species, together with species with molecular data[135−137,144,145]. We found that our collection resembles M. palmicola and M. spinulosum (loose conidiophore with length < 1,000 μm)[133,135]. Conidia of M. palmicola are ellipsoidal, obovoid or subcymbiform, dark olivaceous-brown, and smaller (15–18 × 8–10 μm); while M. spinulosum has 17–23 × 11–15 μm, obovate, dark reddish-brown conidia[133,135]. Conidia in our collection measure 14–19 × 7.6–10.5 μm and are reniform or broad obovoid to semicircular, unlike those of M. palmicola and M. spinulosum. Also, phylogeny supported in our sample is well separated from other species in Melanographium, with a close relationship to M. citri (GZCC21-0208T, GZCC21-0212), with 99% MLBS/1.00 BYPP statistical support (Fig. 17)

      Phylogenetically comparable to the genus Neohendersonia, N. camelliae is introduced here as a new species with sexual morph, based on phylogenetic analyses of a combined SSU, ITS, LSU, rpb2, and tef1 dataset and nucleotide comparisons. Splanchnonema-loricatum was considered the sexual morph of N. kickxii, which is characterized by large ascomata with a thick-walled peridium, but there is no unequivocal evidence for this sexual-asexual connection[146]. The sexual morph of N. camelliae fits well with the generic description of the sexual morph of Neohendersoniaceae and has many more similar characteristics to members of Crassiparies[93,94]. However, they are similar in morphology but can be well separated in phylogeny, and this is the first sexual morph in the genus (Fig. 5). In Fig. 7, there are two points discussed. First, two strains of Magnibotryascoma mali are not grouped with the type strain, as discussed in the notes of M. mali section. Second, Teichospora members are also shown not to group together, instead forming two distinct clades. These results are similar to other publications that Teichospora did not group together but still clustered within Teichosporaceae[137,147,148]. With this problem, the natural generic delimitation of this genus needs to be resolved in the future through taxonomic and phylogenetic studies. Additionally, in this study, we identified another sample of Apiospora yunnana collected from bamboo in Yunnan, China. However, two additional collections, including the holotype, were also found on bamboo in China[106,108]. Therefore, future research should examine whether this species exhibits host specificity, referring to a fungus's ability to infect, colonize, or establish relationships with particular host organisms (Poaceae). In this study, we also identified known species (Botryosphaeria dolichospermatii and Pseudolachnella tengii) that have been reported only in asexual morphs in their life cycles. This study reported, for the first time, another advantage of their sexual morphology, with the potential to further enrich our knowledge.

      Our study provides important insights into fungal diversity at the KIB, Yunnan, China, and highlights the need for further research. Expanding the sampling scope in the KIB area may reveal additional species or shed light on the distribution patterns of the taxa identified here. Additionally, future research should focus on the genetic diversity of these species across populations to explore potential intraspecific variation. Advanced molecular techniques such as whole-genome sequencing could provide deeper insights into their evolutionary history and functional capabilities.

      In conclusion, this study significantly expands the known diversity of the classes Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes, enriching our understanding of fungal diversity in Yunnan Province, China (especially the KIB), by describing two new species and seven new records. These findings not only enhance our knowledge of the fungal taxonomy and phylogeny of these groups but also highlight the biogeographical importance of KIB as a biodiversity hotspot. Therefore, the continuous exploration of the fungal diversity of this area is crucial for uncovering undiscovered taxa, and our study underscores the need for ongoing exploration and conservation of this unique area.

      • This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foun-rhhzhyphendation of China (32260004). Samantha C. Karunarathna and Saowaluck Tibpromma thank the Yunnan Revitalization Talents Support Plan (High-End Foreign Experts Program), and the Key Laboratory of Yunnan Provincial Department of Education of the Deep-Time Evolution on Biodiversity from the Origin of the Pearl River. The authors extend their appreciation to King Saud University, the Researchers Supporting Project Number (RSP2024R197), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Hongbo Jiang appreciates the Postdoctoral Directional Training Foundation of Yunnan Province (Grant no. E33O38E261) under Yunnan Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security, Yunnan, China, and the 1st batch of national (Chinese) postdoctoral overseas attraction program in 2023 from the Ministry of Education of China (MOE) and the Department of Science and Technology of Yunnan, China (Grant no. 202504BI090009). Jaturong Kumla thanks Chiang Mai University for its support.

      • The authors confirm their contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design, data collection, draft manuscript preparation: Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Xu RF, Liu R, Lu L, Karunarathna SC; analysis and interpretation of results: Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Xu RF, Liu R, Karunarathna SC; review and editing: Jiang HB, Bhat J, Dawoud TM, Dai DQ, Tarafder E, Kumla J, Xu J; draft manuscript preparation: Wariss HM. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The data generated for this study are available in NCBI, Index Fungorum, and Facesoffungi databases.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Authors contributed equally: Saowaluck Tibpromma, Subashini C. Jayasiri

      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (18)  Table (1) References (182)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Xu RF, Liu R, Jiang HB, et al. 2026. Additions to saprobic Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China. Studies in Fungi 11: e024 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0024
    Tibpromma S, Jayasiri SC, Xu RF, Liu R, Jiang HB, et al. 2026. Additions to saprobic Dothideomycetes and Sordariomycetes from Kunming Institute of Botany, Yunnan, China. Studies in Fungi 11: e024 doi: 10.48130/sif-0026-0024

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return