HTML
-
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) form symbiotic association with nearly 80% of the plants. Improved plant growth due to inoculation of soil with AMF has been demonstrated, especially under phosphorus (P) deficient conditions (Bagyaraj et al. 2015). The growth improvement is mainly because of enhanced uptake of diffusion-limited nutrients like P, Zn, Cu, etc. AMF can also enhance tolerance to root pathogens and abiotic stresses such as drought and metal toxicity (Bagyaraj 2011, Mathimaran et al. 2017). It also has synergistic interactions with other beneficial soil microorganisms thereby enhance plant growth (Anuroopa & Bagyaraj 2017, Sukeerthi et al. 2020).
Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are another group of beneficial soil bacteria that stimulate plant growth either directly or indirectly. Direct mechanism involves improvement of nutrient availability to the plant by fixing atmospheric nitrogen, solubilizing insoluble phosphates and producing phytohormones. Indirect mechanisms involve reducing the susceptibility to soil-borne plant pathogens through siderophore and hydrogen cyanide (HCN) production and activating induced systemic resistance (ISR) (Hemlata et al. 2015). AMF interacting synergistically with PGPR in soil and enhancing plant growth compared to inoculation with either of them has been reported by earlier workers in crop plants (Hemlata & Bagyaraj 2015, Thilagar et al. 2016, Raghu et al. 2020a, b).
Thysanolaena maxima popularly known as 'broom grass' or 'tiger grass' is an ever green non-timber forest produce species. It grows in tussocks with an average of 4 to 5 resembling foxtail and used as broom to clean the floor in every Indian household. The broom grass can be grown even on marginal lands, wastelands and jhum (slash and burn cultivation) fallow, which not only generates local employment but also its fibrous root system promotes the sustainable use of fragile and degraded lands (Nikhil et al. 2019a, b). This non-timber forest produce due to over exploitation from natural resource is becoming an endangered species and hence attempts are being made for domestication of the species. When domesticated/ cultivated the growth of broom grass is not as good as compared to its growth under natural forest conditions. The possibility of improving its growth through inoculation with beneficial microorganisms like AMF and PGPR was contemplated in the present study based on several earlier reports on other crops (Thilagar et al. 2014, Nikhil et al. 2019c).
In earlier studies we have screened separately and selected the best AMF Claroideoglomus etunicatum (Nikhil et al. 2019a) and the best PGPR Pantoea dispersa which improved the growth and nutrition of broom grass under glasshouse conditions (Nikhil et al. 2019b). The objective of the present glasshouse study was to evaluate the effect of combined inoculation of the selected AMF and PGPR as microbial consortia compared to single inoculation on the promotion of growth and nutrition of broom grass under glasshouse conditions.
-
The glasshouse experiment was conducted at Centre for Natural Biological Resources and Community Development (CNBRCD), Bangalore, India (13°02°85.7°N, 77°58°97.7°E). The rhizome of broom grass used for planting in the present study was obtained from Laya Resource Centre, Vishakapatanam, Andhra Pradesh, India. The substrate used was soil: sand: compost in the ration 1:1:0.25 (v/v/v) respectively. Poly bags of the size 14×26 cm were filled with 3.5kg of the substrate. The substrate mix had a pH of 5.6 and 2.9 ppm available P and an indigenous mycorrhizal population of 18 spores/ 10g of soil substrate (Nikhil et al. 2019c). AMF C. etunicatum maintained in the germplasm bank of CNBRCD, Bangalore using vermiculite mix (vermiculite: perlite: soilrite 3:1:1 v/v/v ratio) as the substrate and Rhodes grass (Chloris gayana) as the host was used in the experiment. The air-dried mix consisting of finely chopped root system plus substrate served as mycorrhizal inoculum. Pantoea dispersa grown on modified nutrient medium for 24hrs at 30℃ which had population of 108 cfu/ ml was used as the inoculum.
A planting hole was made at the center of each polybag filled with the substrate. The different treatments used in the study were.
1. Uninoculated control
2. Inoculated only with C. etunicatum (C.et)
3. Inoculated only with P. dispersa (P.di)
4. Inoculated with C. etunicatum + P. dispersa (C.et+ P.di)
Three grams of mycorrhizal inoculum having 6, 240 infective propagules (IP) per gram substrate were added to the planting holes depending on the treatment. Five ml of PGPR suspension was added to the planting holes based on the treatment. The polybags which did not receive microbial treatment acted as uninoculated control and received 3g of vermiculite mix substrate and 5 ml of modified NA media. Each treatment was replicated 12 times. Broom grass rhizome of uniform size were planted in poly bags. The plants were maintained in a glasshouse and watered whenever necessary.
Plants were harvested 7 months after planting. Plant height was measured from soil surface to the growing tip of the plant and stem girth was measured one cm above the soil surface using digital Vernier Calipers. Biovolume index (BI) (a measure of total volume of the plant) was determined using the formula given by Hatchell et al. (1985). The shoots and roots were separated and dried at 60℃ in an oven to a constant weight to record the shoot and root dry weights. The dried samples were powdered and the nitrogen (N) concentration of the shoot and root was estimated following the Microkjeldahl method (Jackson 1973). The shoot and root P concentration was estimated by vanadomolybdate phosphoric yellow colour method (Jackson 1973). The potassium (K) concentration was estimated by flame photometer method (Jackson 1973). The calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg) concentrations were estimated by EDTA titration method (Jackson 1973). The micronutrients Zn, Fe, Cu, Mn and Bo in the plant was estimated by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) using a hallow cathode lamp set to standard wavelengths (Aggarwal 2018).
Per cent mycorrhizal root colonization was determined after staining the root samples with trypan blue (Philips & Hayman 1970). AM spore numbers in the root zone soil was estimated by wet sieving and decantation method (Gerdemann & Nicolson 1963). P. dispersa population in the substrate was enumerated by the spread plate technique (Sanders 2012). Dehydrogenase activity of the root zone soil was determined following the procedure given by Casida et al. 1964). Statistical analysis of the data was done by analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan's multiple-range test (DMRT) using statistical software AGRES version 3.01.
-
Plant height in uninoculated plants was 26.3 cm/ plant while in plants inoculated with C.et, P.di and C.et+P.di it was significantly more with values 31.0, 29.0 and 32.3 cm/ plant respectively (Table 1). Stem diameter followed a similar trend. BI in uninoculated plants was 114.8. In plants inoculated with C.et and C.et+P.di it was 136.7 and 144.1 respectively differing significantly from uninoculated plants. Shoot dry weight in uninoculated plants was 16.6g/ plant, while in C.et, P.di and C.et+P.di inoculated plants it was 22.1, 20.8 and 25.7g/ plant respectively, all the three being significantly more compared to uninoculated plants. The root dry weight followed more or less a similar trend. Total plant dry weight of C.et, P.di and C.et+P.di inoculated plants were 32, 25 and 47% more compared to uninoculated plants with 25.8g/ plant. All the three values of inoculated plants were significantly higher compared to uninoculated plants (Table 1). N, P, K concentrations in shoot & root of uninoculated plants was 0.89 & 0.70, 0.24 & 0.09, 2.02 & 0.86% respectively. All the three inoculated treatments significantly increased the three major nutrient concentrations, the highest increase being recorded in dual inoculated plants. The increase due to dual inoculation in shoot & root concentration of N was 12 & 10%; P was 29 & 111% and K was 6 & 86% (Table 2). Nutrient concentration of secondary nutrient Ca in shoot & root and Mg in shoot followed a similar trend (Table 3).
Table 1. Influence of microbial inoculants on plant growth parameters of broom grass
Treatments Height (cm/ plant) Stem diameter (mm/ plant) BI Shoot dry weight (g/ plant) Root dry weight (g/ plant) Total plant dry weight (g/ plant) Uninoculated control 26.3c 4.3b 114.8b 16.6c 9.2b 25.8c Claroideoglomus 31.0ab 4.4a 136.7a 22.1b 12.0a 34.1b Pantoea dispersa(P.di) 29.0b 4.4a 128.9ab 20.8b 11.4ab 32.2b C.et+ P.di 32.3a 4.4a 144.1a 25.7a 12.2a 37.9a SED 1.28 0.22 9.93 1.23 0.94 1.53 CD (0.05) 2.57 0.45 20.00 2.54 1.93 3.15 Values superscripted with identical letters within each column do not differ significantly at p≤0.05; CD: Critical difference; UC: Uninoculated control; C.et: Claroideoglomus etunicatum; P.di: Pantoea dispersa Table 2. Influence of microbial inoculants on major and secondary nutrient concentration (%) of broom grass
Treatments N P K Ca Mg Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root UC 0.89c 0.70c 0.24b 0.09d 2.02d 0.86c 0.67c 0.34c 0.22c 0.12c C.et 0.95b 0.75b 0.29a 0.15b 2.09b 1.51b 0.76a 0.58a 0.26a 0.14b P.di 1.00a 0.75b 0.26b 0.11c 2.06c 1.50b 0.73b 0.52b 0.24b 0.12c C.et+P.di 1.00a 0.77a 0.31a 0.19a 2.13a 1.60a 0.77a 0.58a 0.27a 0.24a SED 0.002 0.01 0.009 0.01 0.007 2.35 0.008 0.01 0.008 0.01 CD (0.05) 0.001 0.02 0.002 0.01 0.017 5.76 0.020 0.01 0.020 0.01 Values superscripted with identical letters within each column do not differ significantly at p≤0.05; CD: Critical difference; UC: Uninoculated control; C.et: Claroideoglomus etunicatum; P.di: Pantoea dispersa Table 3. Influence of microbial inoculants on minor nutrient concentration (ppm) of broom grass
Treatments Zn Fe Cu Mn B Mo Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root Shoot Root UC 42.4c 30.2d 371.1c 174.4d 26.9d 37.7c 22.8b 9.3c 18.2d 7.5c 7.6d 43.1c C.et 63.7a 62.6b 495.3b 276.3c 34.7b 58.4b 31.3a 17.1b 22.9c 11.9b 14.5b 72.0a P.di 53.3b 49.6c 501.9b 304.1b 31.4c 56.3b 31.4a 14.2b 29.0b 15.7a 11.5c 62.7b C.et+P.di 65.6a 73.5a 646.6a 327.6a 52.6a 142.0a 31.4a 52.0a 35.1a 16.4a 22.8a 79.3a SED 0.82 3.78 6.42 3.46 0.41 3.10 0.71 1.31 0.01 0.61 0.01 3.01 CD (0.05) 2.01 9.25 15.71 8.47 0.99 7.59 1.73 3.21 0.01 1.50 0.01 7.36 Values superscripted with identical letters within each column do not differ significantly at p≤0.05; CD: Critical difference; UC: Uninoculated control; C.et: Claroideoglomus etunicatum; P.di: Pantoea dispersa The mycorrhizal root colonization in uninoculated plants was 51.3% while it was 90.7, 69.3 and 96.7% in C.et, P.di and C.et+P.di inoculated plants respectively, all the inoculated treatments differing significantly from the uninoculated treatment. Mycorrhizal spore numbers was significantly higher in C.et+P.di treatment with 431 spores/50g of substrate compared to all other inoculated and uninoculated treatments. The population of Pd was 85 x 105/g substrate in C.et+P.di inoculated treatment but was not differing significantly from Pd alone treatment. Other treatments had significantly lower Pd population in the substrate, the least being in uninoculated plants with 8.5 x 105/ g substrate. Dehydrogenase activity which indicates the abundance and activity of microorganisms in soil was 2578, 2150 and 2513μg of TPF released/ g of substrate/ hr in C.et+P.di, P.di and C.et respectively differing significantly from uninoculated treatment with 1975 μg of TPF released/ g of substrate/ hr (Table 4).
Table 4. Influence of microbial inoculants on microbial parameters of broom grass
Treatments Mycorrhizal root colonization (%) Mycorrhizal spore number/ 50 g of substrate CFU of P. dispersa (105/ g substrate) Dehydrogenase (μg of TPF released/ g root zone soil/ hr) Uninoculated control 51.3c 20.5d 8.5b 1975d Claroideoglomus etunicatum (Ce) 90.7a 298.9b 10b 2512.5b Pantoea dispersa (Pd) 69.3b 110c 79a 2150c Ce+Pd 96.7a 430.6a 85a 2577.5a SED 0.52 10.33 2.93 8.16 CD (0.05) 1.06 21.16 6.75 18.82 Values superscripted with identical letters within each column do not differ significantly at p≤0.05; CD: Critical difference; UC: Uninoculated control; C.et: Claroideoglomus etunicatum; P.di: Pantoea dispersa
-
The results of the present study show that inoculation with microbial consortia C.et+P.di significantly enhanced growth and nutrition of broom grass under glasshouse conditions. It has been reported earlier that inoculation with microbial consortia (AMF + PGPR) significantly enhance growth of crop plants like chilly, ashwagandha, and tomato (Thilagar et al. 2016, Anuroopa & Bagyaraj 2017, Desai et al. 2019).
Plants inoculated with C.et+P.di significantly improved plant growth parameters like plant height and BI. Higher BI value indicates higher quality of plants which will also establish better when planted in the field (Hatchell et al. 1985). Increase in plant growth parameters due to inoculation with AMF + PGPR has been observed in other crops like acacia and teak (Raghu et al. 2020a, b). Increased shoot, root and total plant dry weight observed in the present study because of dual inoculation with selected AMF + PGPR is in conformity with such reports published earlier in other plants with selected AMF + PGPR (Ashwin et al. 2019, Jyothi & Bagyaraj 2017).
The plants inoculated with C.et+P.di resulted in the uptake of most of the primary and secondary nutrients compared to singly inoculated and uninoculated plants. Significant increase in primary major nutrients (N, P and K) and the secondary major nutrients (Ca and Mg) was observed in inoculated plants with microbial consortia. Increased N, P and K uptake because of dual inoculation with AMF + PGPR has been reported in other crops by earlier workers (Adesemoye et al. 2008, Jyothi & Bagyaraj 2017). Similarly increase in the secondary major nutrients Ca and Mg due to inoculation with microbial consortia with selected AMF + PGPR is in conformity with the earlier reports in corn (Adesemoye et al. 2008). Inoculation with C.et+P.di significantly enhanced minor nutrient concentration in both shoot and root compared to uninoculated control. Minor nutrients play a vital role for proper functioning of plant metabolism and regulating general plant growth. Earlier workers have reported that inoculation with AMF + PGPR enhances uptake of minor nutrients in flowering plants (Sukeerthi et al. 2020).
In the present study inoculating with microbial consortia significantly enhanced percent mycorrhizal root colonization and spore numbers in root zone soil compared to uninoculated plants which was evident from several works reported (Hemlata et al. 2015, Thilagar et al. 2016). Higher root colonization helps in better absorption of nutrients and hence better plant growth. PGPR population in substrate was found to be significantly higher in inoculated plants compared to uninoculated plants. This is in conformity with the results obtained earlier in tomato by Abhaya et al. (2019) and Desai et al. (2019). Dehydrogenase activity in soil is used as an indicator of microbial activity. In the present study dehydrogenase activity in the root zone soil was significantly higher in AMF+PGPR treatment compared to other inoculated and uninoculated treatments, supporting results obtained earlier by other workers in other crops. Similar results were observed in tulasi and tomato by earlier workers (Jyothi & Bagyaraj 2017, Abhaya et al. 2019).
AMF is known to improve plant nutrition and protect the plants from biotic and abiotic stresses and there by promote plant growth (Jung et al. 2012, Begum et al. 2019). PGPR promote plant growth by production of phyto-hormones and protect plants against root pathogens (Hemlata et al. 2015). Synergistic interaction between AMF+PGPR is also well documented (Thilagar et al. 2016, Jyothi & Bagyaraj 2017). Taking into consideration all the parameters studied and giving weightage to shoot and total plant dry weight, nutrient uptake and soil microbial activity it can be concluded that inoculation with the microbial consortia C.et+P.di significantly enhances the growth and nutrition of broom grass under glasshouse conditions. Validation of this glasshouse study under field conditions is in progress with initial positive indication. Thus, inoculation of broom grass with the eco-friendly and cost effective selected microbial consortia will be a profitable enterprise for the farming community in future.
-
This work was financed by SEED Division, Department of Science and Technology, GOI with File no. SP/TSP/007/2016.
- Copyright: © 2021 by the author(s). This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
N NikhilSai, R Ashwin, DJ Bagyaraj, R VenugopalaRao. 2021. Claroideoglomus etunicatum and Pantoea dispersa significantly enhance growth and nutrition of broom grass. Studies in Fungi 6(1):327−333 doi: 10.5943/sif/6/1/23 |