-
The agroecology types also influenced herd production characteristics. Significant differences were observed in land and livestock ownership, land use for food and fodder crops production, cattle dry matter intakes by sources, metabolizable energy intake by sources, protein intake by sources, and the nutrition analysis of the cattle (Table 1).
Table 1. Test of significant difference (Moses Test of Extreme Reaction) for the effect of agroecology type herd production characteristics of the respondent households.
Parameters p-values Land ownership 0.001 Local livestock holding 0.001 Improved livestock holding 0.001 Land use for food crops and fodder production 0.001 Dry matter intake by sources 0.001 Metabolizable energy intake by sources 0.001 Protein intake by sources 0.001 CP:ME ratio 0.001 Milk yield per ME intake 0.001 CP: crude protein; ME: metabolizable energy. The p-values represent the statistical significance levels corresponding to of each reported parameter; p = 0.001 indicates strong evidence against the null hypothesis, suggesting that there is a significant association between agroecology and the reported parameters. In other words, the p-value suggests that the observed effects are associated with agroecological factors. Land ownership characteristics based on agroecology
-
The land ownership categorization included small, medium, and large land ownerships. The average land size per household for large land ownership was 12.17 ± 1.82 hectares, medium land ownership was 8.05 ± 1.06 hectares, and small land ownership was 4.37 ± 0.35 hectares. The percentages of household land ownership by categories were 40.00% ± 12.40%, 18.75% ± 3.24%, and 41.25% ± 12.52% for large, medium, and small landowners, respectively. The average land size for each category of ownership (large, medium, and small) was higher for households in the derived savanna agroecology compared to the households in the southern Guinea savanna. Additionally, while most households in the southern Guinea savanna fell under the category of small landowners, most households in the derived savanna fell under the category of large landowners, indicating that households in the derived savanna agroecology have access to more land compared to households in the southern Guinea savanna (Table 2).
Table 2. Land ownership and access characteristics of the respondents in the Southern Guinea savanna and derived savanna agroecology by land ownership size and ownership categories.
Land ownership parameters Southern Guinea savannah Derived savannah Mean Large land ownership (ha) 9.29 ± 0.43 15.00 ± 2.85 12.17 ± 1.82 Medium land ownership (ha) 6.10 ± 0.27 10.00 ± 1.48 8.05 ± 1.06 Small land ownership (ha) 3.75 ± 0.38 5.00 ± 0.00 4.37 ± 0.35 Large landowners (%) 15.00 ± 8.66 65 ± 8.65 40.00 ± 12.40 Medium landowners (%) 20.00 ± 5.70 17.50 ± 4.33 18.75 ± 3.24 Small landowners (%) 65.00 ± 14.46 17.50 ± 4.33 41.25 ± 12.52 ha: hectare. Tropical Livestock Units (TLUs) of local and improved livestock
-
The Tropical Livestock Units (TLUs) of the local dairy cattle per household were higher in the southern Guinea savanna compared to the derived savanna. Conversely, the TLUs of improved dairy cattle per household were higher in the derived savanna compared to the southern Guinea savanna agroecological zone. Moreover, the TLUs of non-milk-producing animals, including dry cows, heifers, and young male or female calves, were lower for the derived savanna agroecology compared to the southern Guinea savanna agroecology (Table 3 & 4).
Table 3. Per household Tropical Livestock Units (TLUs) of local livestock ownership of the respondents in the Southern and derived savanna agroecology.
Parameters Southern Guinea savanna Derived savanna Mean Local dairy cattle (TLUs/HH) 53.68 ± 2.85 51.82 ± 17.88 52.75 ± 8.07 Fattening and draught cattle (TLUs/ HH) 1.80 ± 0.55 12.30 ± 7.14 7.05 ± 3.92 Local dairy cows - lactating (TLUs/HH) 27.24 ± 1.55 26.97 ± 0.47 27.10 ± 0.79 Local dairy cows - non lactating (TLUs/HH) 11.00 ± 0.57 13.23 ± 0.30 12.11 ± 0.56 Local dairy heifers (6 months old - 1st calving) (TLUs/HH) 5.72 ± 0.09 27.51 ± 6.96 16.61 ± 5.71 Local dairy female calves (less than 6 months old) (TLUs/HH) 2.12 ± 0.26 11.62 ± 2.97 6.87 ± 2.50 Local dairy calf's male (less than 6 months old) (TLUs/HH) 0.33 ± 0.06 0.79 ± 0.13 0.56 ± 0.18 Local bulls less than 2 years (TLUs/HH) 1.75 ± 0.41 6.50 ± 3.78 4.12 ± 1.97 Local bulls older than 2 years (TLUs/HH) 0.61 ± 0.10 15.20 ± 8.72 7.90 ± 4.41 TLUs: tropical livestock units; HH: household. Table 4. Per household Tropical Livestock Units (TLUs) of improved livestock ownership of the respondents in the southern and derived savanna agroecology.
Parameters Southern Guinea savannah Derived savannah Mean Improved dairy cattle (TLUs/HH) 0.00 ± 0.00 22.73 ± 8.74 22.73 ± 8.74 Improved dairy cows - lactating (TLUs/HH) 0.00 ± 0.00 15.90 ± 9.17 15.90 ± 9.17 Improved dairy cows - non-lactating (TLUs/HH) 0.00 ± 0.00 3.08 ± 1.74 3.08 ± 1.74 Improved dairy heifers (6 months old - 1st calving) (TLUs/HH) 0.00 ± 0.00 3.60 ± 2.06 3.60 ± 2.06 Improved dairy female calves (less than 6 months old) (TLUs/HH) 0.00 ± 0.00 1.20 ± 0.69 1.20 ± 0.69 Improved dairy calf's male (less than 6 months old) (TLUs/HH) 0.00 ± 0.00 1.00 ± 0.55 1.00 ± 0.55 Improved bulls older than 2 years (TLUs/HH) 0.00 ± 0.00 3.00 ± 1.75 3.00 ± 1.75 TLUs: tropical livestock units; HH: household. Land use for fodder crops production
-
The land use for fodder crop production varied between the two agroecological zones. In the southern Guinea savanna, the mean total crop area per household was 4.93 ± 0.78 hectares, while in the derived savanna, it was slightly higher at 5.78 ± 1.02 hectares. Similarly, the total forage area per household was higher in the derived savanna (1.49 ± 0.75 hectares) compared to the southern Guinea savanna (1.02 ± 0.55 hectares). When considering specific yield measurements, it was found that the crop residue yield (kg DM/ha) in the derived savanna was higher (1,886.76 ± 415.63) than in the southern Guinea savanna (1,425.50 ± 317.43). Additionally, the forage yield (kg DM/ha) was significantly higher in the derived savanna (23,650.37 ± 9,516.69) compared to the southern Guinea savanna (16,874.43 ± 7,303.12). This indicates that the derived savanna agroecology has a higher capacity for fodder production. Moreover, the forage crop area as a percentage of the cropped area was higher in the derived savanna (21.20% ± 8.87%) compared to the southern Guinea savanna (17.29% ± 7.22%). This suggests that farmers in the derived savanna allocate a larger proportion of their cropped area specifically for fodder crop cultivation, highlighting the importance of fodder production in agroecology (Table 5).
Table 5. Per household total crop area, crop residue yield and percentage of fodder crop area in the southern and derived savanna agroecology.
Parameters Southern Guinea savanna Derived savanna Mean Total crop area per household (ha/HH) 4.04 ± 0.02 5.83 ± 1.48 4.93 ± 0.78 Total forage area per household (ha/HH) 0.50 ± 0.14 2.47 ± 1.49 1.49 ± 0.75 Crop residue yield (kg DM/ha) 986.89 ± 5.63 2,786.62 ± 232.63 1,886.76 ± 415.63 Forage yield (kg DM/ha) 40,960.00 ± 11,824.13 6,340.74 ± 3,660.83 23,650.37 ± 9,516.69 Forage crop area as percentage of cropped area (%) 12.41 ± 3.63 30.00 ± 17.31 21.20 ± 8.87 ha: hectare; HH: household; Kg: kilogramme; DM: dry matter. Feeds, feeding management, and animal nutrition efficiency
-
Grazing was found to be the major source of dry matter intake in both agroecological zones, contributing to an average of 62.00% ± 13.90% of the total feed supply. However, there were notable differences between the two zones. In the southern Guinea savanna, grazing contributed a higher percentage (75.00% ± 0.00%) to the total feed supply compared to the derived savanna (49.00% ± 28.26%). This could be attributed to the availability of more grazing land and favorable climatic conditions for natural pasture growth in the southern Guinea savanna. Regarding metabolizable energy intake, grazing remained the primary source of feed in both zones. However, there was a significant difference in the contribution of cultivated fodder. In the derived savanna, the percentage supply of metabolizable energy from cultivated fodder was higher (31.00% ± 28.26%) compared to the southern Guinea savanna (15.00% ± 0.00%), indicating a greater emphasis on cultivated fodder production in the derived savanna agroecology (Table 6).
Table 6. Per household sources of dry matter intake of cattle from different sources of the feed supply in the Southern Guinea savanna and derived savanna agroecology.
Parameters Southern Guinea savanna Derived savanna Mean Purchase feed (%) 5.33 ± 0.82 16.50 ± 9.58 10.97 ± 4.91 Grazing (%) 75.00 ± 0.00 49.00 ± 28.26 62.00 ± 13.90 Collected fodder (%) 2.66 ± 0.67 0.00 ± 0.00 2.66 ± 0.67 Crop residue (%) 7.66 ± 0.67 6.00 ± 2.30 6.83 ± 1.14 Cultivated fodder (%) 9.00 ± 0.00 28.50 ± 16.48 18.75 ± 8.51 A similar pattern was observed for crude protein supply percentage. Grazing contributed the largest proportion of crude protein in both zones, but the percentage supply from cultivated fodder was higher in the derived savanna (26.00% ± 15.81%) compared to the southern Guinea savanna (9.00% ± 0.00%). This indicates that farmers in the derived savanna agroecology focus more on providing protein-rich fodder to their cattle. Furthermore, the metabolizable energy quantity supply in millijoules (MJ) per household was higher in the derived savanna agroecology compared to the southern Guinea savanna, reflecting the overall higher availability and quality of feed resources in the derived savanna. These findings suggest that while grazing remains a significant source of feed in both agroecological zones, the derived savanna shows a greater emphasis on cultivated fodder production, leading to higher nutritional efficiency and potential for improved animal productivity presented in Tables 7, 8 & 9.
Table 7. Per household sources of metabolizable energy intake of cattle from different sources of the feed supply in the Southern Guinea savanna and derived savanna agroecology.
Parameters Southern Guinea savanna Derived savanna Mean Purchase feed (%) 8.00 ± 1.10 11.50 ± 6.08 9.75 ± 2.85 Grazing (%) 74.33 ± 0.67 48.50 ± 28.09 61.47 ± 13.77 Collected fodder (%) 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 Crop residue (%) 9.00 ± 1.00 4.00 ± 1.10 6.50 ± 1.32 Cultivated fodder (%) 6.67 ± 2.09 36.00 ± 20.71 21.33 ± 11.47 Table 8. Per household sources of crude protein intake of cattle from different sources of the feed supply in the Southern Guinea savanna and derived savanna agroecology.
Parameters Southern Guinea savanna Derived savanna Mean Purchase feed (%) 9.67 ± 1.47 12.50 ± 6.63 11.03 ± 3.18 Grazing (%) 73.33 ± 1.67 48.50 ± 28.19 60.97 ± 13.75 Collected fodder (%) 2.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 2.00 ± 0.00 Crop residue (%) 7.33 ± 1.33 5.50 ± 2.03 6.47 ± 1.10 Cultivated fodder (%) 7.66 ± 2.33 33.50 ± 19.33 20.53 ± 10.40 Table 9. Analysis of nutrients intakes of the cattle kept by each household with respect to milk production per cattle in each household.
Parameters Southern Guinea savanna Derived savanna Mean Dry matter quantity (kg/HH) 64,511.25 ± 5,664.02 504,597.04 ± 227,307.56 284,554.15 ± 141,505.96 ME quantity (MJ/HH) 583,470.06 ± 51,226.91 4,836,953.98 ± 1,882,599.73 2,710,212.02 ± 1,270,420.18 CP quantity (kg/HH) 5,191.85 ± 455.84 40,726.10 ± 17,989.44 22,958.98 ± 11,309.27 CP:ME ratio (g CP/MJ) 8.9 ± 0.00 7.79 ± 0.87 8.34 ± 0.48 Milk yield per ME (Ltr/MJ) 0.01 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.00 0.017 ± 0.07 Kg: kilogramme; HH: household; ME: metabolizable energy; CP: crude protein; MJ: milojoules; Ltr: Litre. Animal body measurements and expression of phenotypic traits
-
The agroecology types had a significant effect on the animals' measurements and phenotypic traits of the cattle. Significant differences were observed in body condition scores, testis circumference, live weight, age at puberty, and age at first calving between the two agroecological zones. There was a significant difference in the age of the cows under production in the agroecological zones (p = 0.008), but no significant difference in the age of the bulls (Table 10).
Table 10. The descriptive statistics of the animal body measurements and expression of the phenotypic traits of the cows and bulls under low external input operations in the selected agroecology.
Southern Guinea savanna Derived savanna Mean p-values Live weight of the bulls (kg) 205.24 ± 16.30 309.62 ± 27.88 257.43 ± 22.09 0.010 BCS of the bulls 5.79 ± 0.90 6.90 ± 0.59 6.35 ± 0.75 0.010 Testis circumference of the bulls 28.42 ± 0.58 35.20 ± 2.17 31.81 ± 1.38 0.040 Age of the bulls (years) 3.00 ± 0.25 2.70 ± 0.24 2.87 ± 0.25 0.430 Live weight of the cows (kg) 157.33 ± 6.15 313.84 ± 22.73 235.58 ± 14.44 0.006 BCS of the cows 3.50 ± 0.22 6.71 ± 0.33 5.10 ± 0.28 0.001 Age of the cows (years) 3.90 ± 0.37 6.14 ± 0.38 5.02 ± 0.37 0.008 Age of the cows at puberty (years) 2.00 ± 0.00 2.40 ± 0.15 2.20 ± 0.05 0.018 Age of the cows at first calving (years) 2.75 ± 0.00 3.15 ± 0.15 2.95 ± 0.08 0.016 BCS: body condition scores; kg: kilogram. -
The authors are thankful to the Fulani Cattle Breeders in Tafa Local Government Area and Bosso Local Government Areas of Niger State, Jere in Kagarko Local Government Area of Kaduna State, Iseyin Local Government Area, and Shaki West Local Government Area, of Oyo State, Nigeria for their cooperation for execution of the study. Special thanks to management and staff of Genius Farms, Iseyin, Oyo State, Nigeria. Our profound gratitude to Mr. Yusuf Adeyemo and Mr. Abdulrazak for providing us with free accommodation while carrying out the fieldwork.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Sikiru AB, Otu BO, Makinde OJ, Saheed S, Egena SSA, et al. 2024. Comparative analysis of cattle production systems in Nigeria grassland agroecology. Circular Agricultural Systems 4: e001 doi: 10.48130/cas-0023-0012
Comparative analysis of cattle production systems in Nigeria grassland agroecology
- Received: 02 October 2023
- Revised: 25 November 2023
- Accepted: 28 November 2023
- Published online: 09 January 2024
Abstract: This study explores herd production characteristics and phenotypic traits of indigenous dairy cattle in the grassland agroecology of Nigeria. The study highlighted the crucial role of agroecology as a modifier of cattle production operations and emphasized the need for further research to understand the genetic basis of variations in the production. Herd production data were collected through focus group meetings using FEAST software, while body measurements and phenotypic traits of lactating and breeding cattle were recorded in the agroecological zone within the grassland. The data obtained were subjected to descriptive statistics, and Moses Test of Extreme Reaction using SPSS v.20.0.0. The results indicate that the agroecology type significantly influenced various herd production characteristics (p < 0.05). Additionally, agroecology had a significant effect on body measurements and phenotypic trait expressions in the cattle, including live weight, body condition score, testis circumference, age at puberty, and age at first calving (p < 0.05). Furthermore, age differences were observed among cows based on the agroecological zones (p = 0.008), while no significant variation was found in the age of breeding bulls across both agroecology. This study concludes that within the Nigeria's grassland, agroecology plays a crucial role as a modifier of herd production characteristics and phenotypic trait expressions in smallholder dairy cattle operations. These cannot be unconnected with genetics, hence, there is a need for understanding the genetic basis of the variations.
-
Key words:
- Agroecology /
- Dairy Production /
- Cattle Production /
- Herd production characteristics /
- Climate Change