Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Advances in the beneficial endophytic fungi for the growth and health of woody plants

More Information
  • In recent years, the importance of microorganisms for plant survival has been increasingly recognized. Endophytic fungi, as part of holobiont, can confer growth advantages to plants. Most studies have shown that the endophytic fungi of forest trees can promote host plant growth, increase adversity resistance, and thus improve the survival competitiveness of forest trees. However, the beneficial examples of endophytic fungi on the growth and development of woody plants have not been systematically summarized. This review is focused on various aspects of beneficial endophytic fungi in forest trees (definition, classification, colonization mechanisms, etc.), with an emphasis on their beneficial roles in woody plant growth, protection against biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as the response of forest trees to endophytic fungi. In addition, this review lists a series of experiments on screening beneficial endophytic fungi from Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) and verifying their beneficial functions, to explore the mutualistic relationships between them. This review not only provides a theoretical basis for the study of beneficial endophytic fungi in forest trees in the future but also sheds light on the molecular perspectives for a mechanistic understanding of their potential future significance for the sustainable utilization of forest resources and ecological environment protection.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Trivedi P, Leach JE, Tringe SG, Sa T, Singh BK. 2020. Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health. Nature Reviews Microbiology 18:607−21

    doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Asiegbu FO, Kovalchuk A. 2021. An introduction to forest biome and associated microorganisms. In Forest Microbiology, volume 1, eds Asiegbu FO, Kovalchuk A. US: Academic press. pp. 3−16. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-822542-4.00009-7

    [3]

    Vandenkoornhuyse P, Quaiser A, Duhamel M, Le Van A, Dufresne A. 2015. The importance of the microbiome of the plant holobiont. New Phytologist 206:1196−206

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13312

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Khan RAA, Najeeb S, Chen J, Wang R, Zhang J, et al. 2023. Insights into the molecular mechanism of Trichoderma stimulating plant growth and immunity against phytopathogens. Physiologia Plantarum 175:e14133

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.14133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Ali S, Tyagi A, Bae H. 2023. Plant microbiome: an ocean of possibilities for improving disease resistance in plants. Microorganisms 11:392

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020392

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Wang L, Wang S, Zhang Q, He C, Fu C, et al. 2022. The role of the gut microbiota in health and cardiovascular diseases. Molecular Biomedicine 3:30

    doi: 10.1186/s43556-022-00091-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Simon JC, Marchesi JR, Mougel C, Selosse MA. 2019. Host-microbiota interactions: from holobiont theory to analysis. Microbiome 7:5

    doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0619-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Berg G, Rybakova D, Fischer D, Cernava T, Vergès MCC, et al. 2020. Microbiome definition re-visited: old concepts and new challenges. Microbiome 8:103

    doi: 10.1186/s40168-020-00875-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Hacquard S, Wang E, Slater H, Martin F. 2022. Impact of global change on the plant microbiome. New Phytologist 234:1907−09

    doi: 10.1111/nph.18187

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Sellappan R, Krishnan A, Thangavel K. 2022. Role of plant microbiome in carbon sequestration for sustainable agriculture. In Core Microbiome, eds Parray JA, Shameem N, Abd-Allah EF, Mir MY. US: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. pp. 190−205. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119830795.ch11

    [11]

    de Bary A. 1879. Die Erscheinung der Symbiose. Vortrag, Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111471839

    [12]

    Wilson D. 1995. Endophyte: the evolution of a term, and clarification of its use and definition. Oikos 73:274−76

    doi: 10.2307/3545919

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Petrini O. Fungal endophytes of tree leaves. In Microbial Ecology of Leaves, eds Andrews JH, Hirano SS. NY: Springer New York. pp. 179–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-3168-4_9

    [14]

    Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW. 1997. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 43:895−914

    doi: 10.1139/m97-131

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Hardoim PR, van Overbeek LS, Berg G, Pirttila AM, Compant S, et al. 2015. The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 79:293−320

    doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Zhang W, Xia K, Feng Z, Qin Y, Zhou Y, et al. 2024. Tomato plant growth promotion and drought tolerance conferred by three arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is mediated by lipid metabolism. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 208:108478

    doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.108478

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Chen Y, Fu Y, Xia Y, Miao Y, Shao J, et al. 2024. Trichoderma-secreted anthranilic acid promotes lateral root development via auxin signaling and RBOHF-induced endodermal cell wall remodeling. Cell Reports 43:114030

    doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Zhan X, Wang R, Zhang M, Li Y, Sun T, et al. 2024. Trichoderma-derived emodin competes with ExpR and ExpI of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum to biocontrol bacterial soft rot. Pest Management Science 80:1039−52

    doi: 10.1002/ps.7835

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Berthelot C, Leyval C, Foulon J, Chalot M, Blaudez D. 2016. Plant growth promotion, metabolite production and metal tolerance of dark septate endophytes isolated from metal-polluted poplar phytomanagement sites. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 92:fiw144

    doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw144

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Terhonen E, Blumenstein K, Kovalchuk A, Asiegbu FO. 2019. Forest tree microbiomes and associated fungal endophytes: functional roles and impact on forest health. Forests 10:42

    doi: 10.3390/f10010042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Wani ZA, Ashraf N, Mohiuddin T, Riyaz-Ul-Hassan S. 2015. Plant-endophyte symbiosis, an ecological perspective. Journal of Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 99:2955−65

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6487-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Stergiopoulos I, Gordon TR. 2014. Cryptic fungal infections: the hidden agenda of plant pathogens. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:506

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00506

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Hyde KD, Xu J, Rapior S, Jeewon R, Lumyong S, et al. 2019. The amazing potential of fungi: 50 ways we can exploit fungi industrially. Fungal Diversity 97:1−136

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00430-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Rashmi M, Kushveer JS, Sarma VV. 2019. A worldwide list of endophytic fungi with notes on ecology and diversity. Mycosphere 10:798−1079

    doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/10/1/19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Jia Q, Qu J, Mu H, Sun H, Wu C. 2020. Foliar endophytic fungi: Diversity in species and functions in forest ecosystems. Symbiosis 80:103−32

    doi: 10.1007/s13199-019-00663-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Rodriguez PA, Rothballer M, Chowdhury SP, Nussbaumer T, Gutjahr C, et al. 2019. Systems biology of plant-microbiome interactions. Molecular Plant 12:804−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2019.05.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Carroll G. 1988. Fungal endophytes in stems and leaves: from latent pathogen to mutualistic symbiont. Ecology 69:2−9

    doi: 10.2307/1943154

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Brader G, Compant S, Vescio K, Mitter B, Trognitz F, et al. 2017. Ecology and genomic insights into plant-pathogenic and plant-nonpathogenic endophytes. Annual Review of Phytopathology 55:61−83

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-080516-035641

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lamichhane JR, Venturi V. 2015. Synergisms between microbial pathogens in plant disease complexes: a growing trend. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:385

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Hiruma K, Gerlach N, Sacristan S, Nakano RT, Hacquard S, et al. 2016. Root endophyte Colletotrichum tofieldiae confers plant fitness benefits that are phosphate status dependent. Cell 165:464−74

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.02.028

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Sasse J, Martinoia E, Northen T. 2018. Feed your friends: do plant exudates shape the root microbiome? Trends in Plant Science 23:25−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Gagic M, Faville MJ, Zhang W, Forester NT, Rolston MP, et al. 2018. Seed transmission of Epichloë endophytes in Lolium perenne is heavily influenced by host genetics. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1580

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01580

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Toti L, Chapela IH, Petrini O. 1992. Morphometric evidence for host-specific strain formation in Discula umbrinella. Mycological Research 96:420−24

    doi: 10.1016/S0953-7562(09)81085-X

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Kandel SL, Joubert PM, Doty SL. 2017. Bacterial endophyte colonization and distribution within plants. Microorganisms 5:77

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms5040077

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Suárez-Moreno ZR, Devescovi G, Myers M, Hallack L, Mendonça-Previato L, et al. 2010. Commonalities and differences in regulation of N-acyl homoserine lactone quorum sensing in the beneficial plant-associated Burkholderia species cluster. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 76:4302−17

    doi: 10.1128/AEM.03086-09

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Ayob FW, Simarani K. 2016. Endophytic filamentous fungi from a Catharanthus roseus: identification and its hydrolytic enzymes. Saudi Pharmaceutical Journal 24:273−78

    doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Mendoza-Mendoza A, Zaid R, Lawry R, Hermosa R, Monte E, et al. 2018. Molecular dialogues between Trichoderma and roots: role of the fungal secretome. Fungal Biology Reviews 32:62−85

    doi: 10.1016/j.fbr.2017.12.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Wawra S, Fesel P, Widmer H, Timm M, Seibel J, et al. 2016. The fungal-specific β-glucan-binding lectin FGB1 alters cell-wall composition and suppresses glucan-triggered immunity in plants. Nature Communications 7:13188

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms13188

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Yan L, Zhu J, Zhao X, Shi J, Jiang C, et al. 2019. Beneficial effects of endophytic fungi colonization on plants. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 103:3327−40

    doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09713-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Vurukonda SSKP, Giovanardi D, Stefani E. 2018. Plant growth promoting and biocontrol activity of Streptomyces spp. as endophytes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19:952

    doi: 10.3390/ijms19040952

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Aly AH, Debbab A, Kjer J, Proksch P. 2010. Fungal endophytes from higher plants: a prolific source of phytochemicals and other bioactive natural products. Fungal Diversity 41:1−16

    doi: 10.1007/s13225-010-0034-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Torres-Mendoza D, Ortega HE, Cubilla-Rios L. 2020. Patents on endophytic fungi related to secondary metabolites and biotransformation applications. Journal of Fungi 6:58

    doi: 10.3390/jof6020058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Omomowo IO, Amao JA, Abubakar A, Ogundola AF, Ezediuno LO, et al. 2023. A review on the trends of endophytic fungi bioactivities. Scientific African 20:e01594

    doi: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01594

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Chutulo EC, Chalannavar RK. 2018. Endophytic mycoflora and their bioactive compounds from Azadirachta indica: a comprehensive review. Journal of Fungi 4:42

    doi: 10.3390/jof4020042

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Gong A, Zhou T, Xiao C, Jiang W, Zhou Y, et al. 2019. Association between dipsacus saponin VI level and diversity of endophytic fungi in roots of Dipsacus asperoides. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 35:42

    doi: 10.1007/s11274-019-2616-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Lubna, Asaf S, Hamayun M, Gul H, Lee IJ, et al. 2018. Aspergillus niger CSR3 regulates plant endogenous hormones and secondary metabolites by producing gibberellins and indoleacetic acid. Journal of Plant Interactions 13:100−11

    doi: 10.1080/17429145.2018.1436199

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Manganyi MC, Ateba CN. 2020. Untapped potentials of endophytic fungi: a review of novel bioactive compounds with biological applications. Microorganisms 8:1934

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8121934

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Hoffman MT, Gunatilaka MK, Wijeratne K, Gunatilaka L, Arnold AE. 2013. Endohyphal bacterium enhances production of indole-3-acetic acid by a foliar fungal endophyte. PLoS One 8:e73132

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Khan AL, Al-Harrasi A, Al-Rawahi A, Al-Farsi Z, Al-Mamari A, et al. 2016. Endophytic fungi from frankincense tree improves host growth and produces extracellular enzymes and indole acetic acid. PLoS One 11:e0158207

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158207

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Attia MS, Hashem AH, Badawy AA, Abdelaziz AM. 2022. Biocontrol of early blight disease of eggplant using endophytic Aspergillus terreus: improving plant immunological, physiological and antifungal activities. Botanical Studies 63:26

    doi: 10.1186/s40529-022-00357-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Singh A, Singh DK, Kharwar RN, White JF, Gond SK. 2021. Fungal endophytes as efficient sources of plant-derived bioactive compounds and their prospective applications in natural product drug discovery: insights, avenues, and challenges. Microorganisms 9:197

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9010197

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Guo N, Zhu YW, Jiang YW, Li HK, Liu ZM, et al. 2020. Improvement of flavonoid aglycone and biological activity of mulberry leaves by solid-state fermentation. Industrial Crops and Products 148:112287

    doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112287

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ayer WA, Cruz ER. 1993. The tremulanes, a new group of sesquiterpenes from the aspen rotting fungus Phellinus tremulae. The Journal of Organic Chemistry 58:7529−34

    doi: 10.1021/jo00078a035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Klaiklay S, Rukachaisirikul V, Phongpaichit S, Buatong J, Preedanon S, et al. 2013. Flavodonfuran: a new difuranylmethane derivative from the mangrove endophytic fungus Flavodon flavus PSU-MA201. Natural Product Research 27:1722−26

    doi: 10.1080/14786419.2012.750315

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Rukachaisirikul V, Rodglin A, Phongpaichit S, Buatong J, Sakayaroj J. 2012. α-Pyrone and seiricuprolide derivatives from the mangrove-derived fungi Pestalotiopsis spp. PSU-MA92 and PSU-MA119. Phytochemistry Letters 5:13−17

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytol.2011.08.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Kouipou Toghueo RM, Boyom FF. 2019. Endophytic fungi from Terminalia species: a comprehensive review. Journal of Fungi 5:43

    doi: 10.3390/jof5020043

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Nicoletti R, Di Vaio C, Cirillo C. 2020. Endophytic fungi of olive tree. Microorganisms 8:1321

    doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8091321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Singh B, Satyanarayana T. 2011. Microbial phytases in phosphorus acquisition and plant growth promotion. Physiology and Molecular Biology of Plants 17:93−103

    doi: 10.1007/s12298-011-0062-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Govinda Rajulu MB, Suryanarayanan TS, Murali TS, Thirunavukkarasu N, Venkatesan G. 2021. Minor species of foliar fungal endophyte communities: do they matter? Mycological Progress 20:1353−63

    doi: 10.1007/s11557-021-01740-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Paolinelli-Alfonso M, Villalobos-Escobedo JM, Rolshausen P, Herrera-Estrella A, Galindo-Sánchez C, et al. 2016. Global transcriptional analysis suggests Lasiodiplodia theobromae pathogenicity factors involved in modulation of grapevine defensive response. BMC Genomics 17:615

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2952-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Babu AG, Shea PJ, Oh BT. 2014. Trichoderma sp. PDR1-7 promotes Pinus sylvestris reforestation of lead-contaminated mine tailing sites. Science of the Total Environment 476–477:561−67

    doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Christian N, Herre EA, Clay K. 2019. Foliar endophytic fungi alter patterns of nitrogen uptake and distribution in Theobroma cacao. New Phytologist 222:1573−83

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15693

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Lacercat-Didier L, Berthelot C, Foulon J, Errard A, Martino E, et al. 2016. New mutualistic fungal endophytes isolated from poplar roots display high metal tolerance. Mycorrhiza 26:657−71

    doi: 10.1007/s00572-016-0699-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Cheng X, Xie M, Li Y, Liu B, Liu C, et al. 2022. Effects of field inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and endophytic fungi on fruit quality and soil properties of Newhall navel orange. Applied Soil Ecology 170:104308

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2021.104308

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Wang M, Xiang L, Tang W, Chen X, Li C, et al. 2024. Improving apple orchard health: the role of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviating replant disease and strengthening soil microbial communities. Applied Soil Ecology 196:105278

    doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2024.105278

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Que Y, Xie W, Fang X, Xu H, Ye S, et al. 2024. Transcriptome analysis reveals the response of Cryptomeria japonica to feeding stress of Dendrolimus houi Lajonquière larvae. Forests 15:85

    doi: 10.3390/f15010085

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Martínez-Arias C, Sobrino-Plata J, Ormeño-Moncalvillo S, Gil L, Rodríguez-Calcerrada J, et al. 2021. Endophyte inoculation enhances Ulmus minor resistance to Dutch elm disease. Fungal Ecology 50:101024

    doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2020.101024

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Quiring D, Adams G, McCartney A, Edwards S, Miller JD. 2020. A foliar endophyte of white spruce reduces survival of the eastern spruce budworm and tree defoliation. Forests 11:659

    doi: 10.3390/f11060659

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Quiring D, Adams G, Flaherty L, McCartney A, Miller JD, et al. 2019. Influence of a foliar endophyte and budburst phenology on survival of wild and laboratory-reared eastern spruce budworm, Choristoneura fumiferana on white spruce (Picea glauca). Forests 10:503

    doi: 10.3390/f10060503

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Tanney JB, McMullin DR, Miller JD. 2018. Toxigenic foliar endophytes from the Acadian forest. In Endophytes of Forest Trees, vol 86, eds Pirttilä A, Frank A. Cham: Springer. pp. 343–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89833-9_15

    [71]

    McMullin DR, Nguyen HDT, Daly GJ, Menard BS, Miller JD. 2018. Detection of foliar endophytes and their metabolites in Picea and Pinus seedling needles. Fungal Ecology 31:1−8

    doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2017.09.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Liu J, Ridgway HJ, Jones EE. 2020. Apple endophyte community is shaped by tissue type, cultivar and site and has members with biocontrol potential against Neonectria ditissima. Journal of Applied Microbiology 128:1735−53

    doi: 10.1111/jam.14587

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Sumarah MW, Walker AK, Seifert KA, Todorov A, Miller JD. 2015. Screening of fungal endophytes isolated from eastern white pine needles. In The Formation, Structure and Activity of Phytochemicals, vol 45, ed. Jetter R. Cham: Springer. pp. 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20397-3_8

    [74]

    Blumenstein K, Albrectsen BR, Martín JA, Hultberg M, Sieber TN, et al. 2015. Nutritional niche overlap potentiates the use of endophytes in biocontrol of a tree disease. BioControl 60:655−67

    doi: 10.1007/s10526-015-9668-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Morrison EW, Kasson MT, Heath JJ, Garnas JR. 2021. Pathogen and endophyte assemblages co-vary with beech bark disease progression, tree decline, and regional climate. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change 4:673099

    doi: 10.3389/ffgc.2021.673099

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Vaz ABM, Fonseca PLC, Badotti F, Skaltsas D, Tomé LMR, et al. 2018. A multiscale study of fungal endophyte communities of the foliar endosphere of native rubber trees in Eastern Amazon. Scientific Reports 8:16151

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34619-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Christian N, Herre EA, Mejia LC, Clay K. 2017. Exposure to the leaf litter microbiome of healthy adults protects seedlings from pathogen damage. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 284:20170641

    doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.0641

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Mejía LC, Herre EA, Sparks JP, Winter K, García MN, et al. 2014. Pervasive effects of a dominant foliar endophytic fungus on host genetic and phenotypic expression in a tropical tree. Frontiers in Microbiology 5:479

    doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00479

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Martínez-Arias C, Macaya-Sanz D, Witzell J, Martín JA. 2019. Enhancement of Populus alba tolerance to Venturia tremulae upon inoculation with endophytes showing in vitro biocontrol potential. European Journal of Plant Pathology 153:1031−42

    doi: 10.1007/s10658-018-01618-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Russ D, Fitzpatrick CR, Teixeira PJPL, Dangl JL. 2023. Deep discovery informs difficult deployment in plant microbiome science. Cell 186:4496−513

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.08.035

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Zheng J, Xie X, Li C, Wang H, Yu Y, et al. 2023. Regulation mechanism of plant response to heavy metal stress mediated by endophytic fungi. International Journal of Phytoremediation 25:1596−613

    doi: 10.1080/15226514.2023.2176466

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Pan X, Qin Y, Yuan Z. 2018. Potential of a halophyte-associated endophytic fungus for sustaining Chinese white poplar growth under salinity. Symbiosis 76:109−16

    doi: 10.1007/s13199-018-0541-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Thiem D, Piernik A, Hrynkiewicz K. 2018. Ectomycorrhizal and endophytic fungi associated with Alnus glutinosa growing in a saline area of central Poland. Symbiosis 75:17−28

    doi: 10.1007/s13199-017-0512-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Zhang F, Liu Z, Gulijimila M, Wang Y, Fan H, et al. 2016. Functional analysis of the 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase gene of the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma asperellum ACCC30536. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 96:265−75

    doi: 10.1139/cjps-2014-0265

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Yamaji K, Watanabe Y, Masuya H, Shigeto A, Yui H, et al. 2016. Root fungal endophytes enhance heavy-metal stress tolerance of Clethra barbinervis growing naturally at mining sites via growth enhancement, promotion of nutrient uptake and decrease of heavy-metal concentration. PLoS One 11:e0169089

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169089

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Ruotsalainen AL, Kauppinen M, Wäli PR, Saikkonen K, Helander M, et al. 2022. Dark septate endophytes: mutualism from by-products? Trends in Plant Science 27:247−54

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Akhtar N, Wani AK, Dhanjal DS, Mukherjee S. 2022. Insights into the beneficial roles of dark septate endophytes in plants under challenging environment: resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses. World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 38:79

    doi: 10.1007/s11274-022-03264-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Zuo Y, Su F, He X, Li M. 2020. Colonization by dark septate endophytes improves the growth of Hedysarum scoparium under multiple inoculum levels. Symbiosis 82:201−14

    doi: 10.1007/s13199-020-00713-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Terhonen E, Sipari N, Asiegbu FO. 2016. Inhibition of phytopathogens by fungal root endophytes of Norway spruce. Biological Control 99:53−63

    doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.04.006

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Wen Z, Terhonen E, Asiegbu FO. 2022. The dark septate endophyte Phialocephala sphaeroides confers growth fitness benefits and mitigates pathogenic effects of Heterobasidion on Norway spruce. Tree Physiology 42:891−906

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpab147

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Marfuah DS, Hamim H, Sulistyaningsih YC, Surono S, Setyaningsih L, et al. 2024. Dark septate endophyte inoculation improved Pb phytoremediation of Jatropha curcas and Reutealis trisperma on gold mine tailings. Bioremediation Journal 28:325−42

    doi: 10.1080/10889868.2023.2279194

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Li X, He X, Hou L, Ren Y, Wang S, et al. 2018. Dark septate endophytes isolated from a xerophyte plant promote the growth of Ammopiptanthus mongolicus under drought condition. Scientific Reports 8:7896

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26183-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Liu Y, Wei X. 2019. Dark septate endophyte improves drought tolerance of Ormosia hosiei Hemsley & E. H. Wilson by modulating root morphology, ultrastructure, and the ratio of root hormones. Forests 10:830

    doi: 10.3390/f10100830

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Liu Y, Wei X. 2021. Dark septate endophyte improves the drought-stress resistance of Ormosia hosiei seedlings by altering leaf morphology and photosynthetic characteristics. Plant Ecology 222:761−71

    doi: 10.1007/s11258-021-01135-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Al Husnain L, Alajlan L, AlKahtani MDF, orfali R, Ameen F. 2023. Avicennia marina endophytic fungi shows antagonism against tomato pathogenic fungi. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences 22:214−22

    doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2022.12.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Terhonen E, Kovalchuk A, Zarsav A, Asiegbu FO. 2018. Biocontrol potential of forest tree endophytes. In Endophytes of Forest Trees: Biology and Applications, vol 86, eds Pirttilä AM, Frank AC. Cham: Springer International Publishing. pp. 283–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89833-9_13

  • Cite this article

    Hong L, Wang Q, Zhang J, Chen X, Liu Y, et al. 2024. Advances in the beneficial endophytic fungi for the growth and health of woody plants. Forestry Research 4: e028 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0025
    Hong L, Wang Q, Zhang J, Chen X, Liu Y, et al. 2024. Advances in the beneficial endophytic fungi for the growth and health of woody plants. Forestry Research 4: e028 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0025

Figures(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(643) PDF downloads(110)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Advances in the beneficial endophytic fungi for the growth and health of woody plants

Forestry Research  4 Article number: e028  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: In recent years, the importance of microorganisms for plant survival has been increasingly recognized. Endophytic fungi, as part of holobiont, can confer growth advantages to plants. Most studies have shown that the endophytic fungi of forest trees can promote host plant growth, increase adversity resistance, and thus improve the survival competitiveness of forest trees. However, the beneficial examples of endophytic fungi on the growth and development of woody plants have not been systematically summarized. This review is focused on various aspects of beneficial endophytic fungi in forest trees (definition, classification, colonization mechanisms, etc.), with an emphasis on their beneficial roles in woody plant growth, protection against biotic and abiotic stresses, as well as the response of forest trees to endophytic fungi. In addition, this review lists a series of experiments on screening beneficial endophytic fungi from Chinese fir (Cunninghamia lanceolata) and verifying their beneficial functions, to explore the mutualistic relationships between them. This review not only provides a theoretical basis for the study of beneficial endophytic fungi in forest trees in the future but also sheds light on the molecular perspectives for a mechanistic understanding of their potential future significance for the sustainable utilization of forest resources and ecological environment protection.

    • The forest is a complex community dominated by woody plants, which plays an important role in maintaining ecological balance, climate stability as well as biodiversity. Forests provide a large number of ecological niches for the growth and reproduction of various microorganisms (e.g. bacteria, fungi, protozoa) and nematodes. Accordingly, they can form complex symbiotic relationships with plants and contribute to their productivity and adaptability in the natural environment[1]. Plants have diverse and well-structured microbial communities that colonize almost every available plant tissue, including the rhizosphere (the root-soil interface of plants), the phyllosphere (the air-plant interface), and the endosphere (the internal tissues of plants)[2]. These microbial communities that colonize both inside and outside of plant tissues are collectively referred to as the plant microbiota (microbiome)[3]. Many studies have been conducted to unravel the importance of microorganisms in plant growth, and health[4,5]. The plant microbiome confers many adaptive advantages to the host such as growth promotion, nutrient uptake, stress tolerance, and resistance to pathogens. Similar to human and gut microbiota[6], plants can be regarded as a holobiont or meta-organisms containing the host plants and their microbiota[7,8]. In addition, at the macro level, the plant microbiome has great potential for sustainable agriculture and for mitigating the negative effects of climate change on plant productivity[9,10].

      The plant microbiome comprises epiphytes as well as endophytes. The term 'endophyte' is a combination word derived from the Greek word 'endon' and 'phyton', the former meaning 'internal' and the latter meaning 'plant'. Initially, the German botanist Heinrich Friedrich Link was the first to use the term 'Entophytae' to describe endophytes in 1809 to denote a distinct group of parasitic fungi that live partially in plants. Later in 1886, the German botanist Anton de Bary, regarded as the father of plant pathology coined the term 'Endophyte' to describe microorganisms that colonize the internal tissues of stems and leaves[11]. These early definitions have undergone a long process of modification, for example, it has been clearly stated that not only stems and leaves of plants are colonized, but also roots and shoots of the host plants[12,13]. Meanwhile, the definition of endophyte was continuously revised by different researchers based on their understanding, and Hallmann et al.[14] considered endophyte to be microbes that can be isolated from surface-sterilized plant tissues or extracted from the interior of plants and that do not visibly them. After this an endophyte was described as a microorganism that invades living plant tissues without causing any noticeable effect. It has also been argued that the term 'endophyte' should be considered in terms of habitat rather than function, and that the term should therefore be defined more broadly[15]. In other words, this means that endophytes may not remain endophytic throughout their life cycle. As representative members of the plant microbiome colonizing plant tissues, plant endophytes are more closely interdependent with their hosts due to their ability to interact directly with plant cells, and therefore they play a unique role in holobiont. Some endophytes are equally capable of improving soil fertility, promoting plant growth and development, and protecting plants from pathogens. In addition, some beneficial endophytes can induce tolerance mechanisms in hosts under biotic and abiotic environmental stresses through interactions with the host[16,17].

      As a member of the endophyte family, the mechanism by which endophytic fungi promote plant growth and development is related to the active substances they produce. These active substances may be able to inhibit the activity of pathogens that cause disease in the host, in a way that is analogous to the role of phytohormones in promoting the growth of the host to some extent, which will be elaborated on in more detail later. For example, an endophytic fungal strain Trichoderma asperellum LN004 can produce emodin interfering with the quorum sensing of Pectobacterium carotovorum subsp. carotovorum and reduces its pathogenicity, mitigating crop damage[18]. Similarly, dark septate endophytes promote the growth of host plants by producing growth hormones and volatile organic compounds that increase the biomass of plant rhizomes[19]. Researchers have continued to explore the molecular mechanisms involved in the growth, development, and induction of systemic resistance in woody plants by endophytic fungi based on previous studies[20]. However, not much is known about the biochemical, molecular, and genetic basis of endophytic interactions. One of the key ways to improve the utilization of woody plants is to deeply explore the mechanisms by which endophytic fungi regulate the growth, development, and resistance of woody plants.

      This review therefore summarizes the recent advances on studies of endophytic fungi with respect to woody plants. We focus on the following three aspects: 1) basic understanding of endophytic fungi; 2) natural substances produced by plant endophytic fungi; 3) positive responses and practical applications of beneficial endophytic fungi on forest trees. It also describes the beneficial effects of endophytic fungi on woody plants from several perspectives, to provide a scientific basis for the use and conservation of woody plant resources.

    • According to phylogenetic affiliation, metabolic potential, physiological characteristics, and mode of transmission, endophytes can be classified into systemic and non-systemic endophytes[21]. The term 'endophytic fungi' refers to fungi that live inside plant tissues by establishing a mutually beneficial symbiotic relationship with the host plants throughout all or part of their life cycle, without causing any adverse effects or diseases to the host[22,23]. Currently, endophytic fungi are present in all studied plants, 87% of endophytic fungi belong to Ascomycota and are distributed in 10 phyla, while the other 13% belong to phyla such as Basidiomycota, Chytridiomycota, Mucoromycota and Zygomycota[24]. Therefore, endophytic fungi form highly diverse and multifunctional microbial communities, which seem to be ubiquitous in nature. They have been isolated and cultured from underground and aboveground parts of a wide variety of plants. It is therefore not surprising that the biodiversity of endophytic fungi in both lower and higher plants exhibit variation across geographic regions and hosts[25]. Since the beginning of the 20th century, with the deepening of research on endophytic fungi of different plant species, more and more endophytic fungi have been found in many broad leaf and conifer trees, which fully demonstrates the universality and diversity of endophytic fungi in forest trees further underlying its importance to the health of woody plants.

    • In general, microorganisms associate with plants through three basic nutritional lifestyle strategies: Symbiosis, mutualism, and parasitism. Plant-endophytic fungi are often known to be symbiotic or mutualistic, although the presence of pathogenic has also been reported[26]. Mutualistic symbiosis is a positive and collaborative relationship in which both parties benefit. The endophytic fungi provide various benefits to host plants (such as promoting the acquisition of nutrients, promoting individual growth, and improving resistance to stress environment), and plants in turn provide carbohydrates to fungi. Carroll proposed two types of plant-endophyte mutualistic symbioses[27]: 'constitutive mutualism' and 'inducible mutualism'. As the name suggests, constitutive mutualism is a type of association exclusively between plants and microorganisms. This type of microorganism is usually found in herbs and can be passed on to the next generation through seeds, which is the case of the previously mentioned systemic endophytes. In contrast, if the endophytes exhibit inducible mutualistic symbiosis, then this usually refers to infecting the nutrient organs of the host (not involving transmission via host seeds). These non-systemic endophytes usually live in aging or metabolically inactive tissues, and only when the host is injured or affected by stress will they colonize important tissues.

      Most plant-endophytic fungi interactions are considered to be symbiotic[15,28]. This type of combination has no known effect on the host plants, and the research progress at this stage is still uncertain whether it has an effect, although the endophytic fungi benefit from an uninterrupted nutrient supply. Many of the mutually beneficial symbionts and potential pathogens that can be induced during metabolically inactive phases may represent symbiotic states in plants. Some pathogenic microorganisms are known to spend part of their life cycle asymptomatically in a latent state within plant tissues[29]. Based on the definition of habitat endophytes[14] (found within plant tissues without any visually visible symptoms of disease), we consider the potential pathogenic state of such endophytic fungi to be endophytic as well. However, microorganisms present as endophytes in a given plant may exhibit pathogenic symptoms in the same or similar plants. Endophytic fungi present in a specific host are usually similar at the phylogenetic level to harmful pathogens in related host species[27]. It has been reported that Colletotrichum tofieldiae inhibits the growth of Capsella rubella as a pathogen, whereas the former can act as a beneficial fungus to promote the growth of Arabidopsis thaliana under low phosphorus conditions[30]. This suggests that endophytic fungi can remain beneficial or turn into pathogens, depending on different environmental conditions or host plant types. In other words, microorganisms pathogenic to this plant species may exist as endophytic fungi in other species. However, plant-endophytic fungal symbioses may transform into mutually beneficial or pathogenic interactions depending on different external conditions. That is, although many studies have found some endophytic fungal isolates to be beneficial to host plants, it is important to note that endophytic fungi may also be pathogenic or potentially pathogenic, depending on environmental factors and host susceptibility.

    • Most endophytic fungi originate from the host plant's growing environment, including soil and rhizosphere microorganisms, fungal spores floating in the air, and the feeding behavior of insects and animals[31]. Endophytic fungi usually enter plants via two modes of transmission (Fig. 1). The first is a vertical transmission, which is the main way of infecting offspring[32]. When seeds germinate under appropriate conditions, endophytic fungi from the parent enter the offspring plant during germination, thus enabling the spread of endophytic fungi between the host plants and the offspring. The second is a horizontal transmission, in which some endophytic fungi in the host plant horizontal transmission among different individuals through other propagators such as spores and/or hyphae, to realize the diffusion of endophytic fungi among plants.

      Figure 1. 

      Colonization process and strategy of endophytic fungus transmission. EPS: Extracellular polysaccharides, LPS: Lipopolysaccharides, PRRs: Pattern recognition receptors, MAMPs: Microbe-associated molecular patterns; MTI: MAMP-triggered immunity; ETI: Effector-triggered immunity.

      Attachment or adhesion of fungal propagules is a prerequisite for the successful colonization of plants by endophytic fungi, and endophytic fungi follow a similar pattern of adhesion and penetration of host tissues as pathogenic microorganisms. Each endophytic fungus has a different colonization method and 'access'. Endophytic fungi actively exude adhesion components that help to recognize and bind to specific host plants in specific environments. Electron microscope study on the spores of endophytic fungus Discula umbrinella colonized in leaves showed that there was a sticky sheath composed of polysaccharide on the surface of its conidia, which could make endophytic fungi attach to host plants[33]. Shortly after the microbial strain has landed, plants then show different responses, which will lead to a diverse gene expression. In the initial stage, after the endophytic fungi are attached to the root surface, penetration structures are developed to facilitate colonization of the internal tissues. Penetration of plant surface could be through active or passive processes. Passive pathways include root fissures, stomata, lenticels, drains, or shoot incisions[34], whereas active pathways are mediated by extracellular polysaccharides (EPS), lipopolysaccharides (LPS), structural components (e.g. chitin), and quorum sensing[35]. It has been reported that microorganisms select thin surface areas (including root hairs or the elongation zone of the root apical meristem (RAM)) to enter the root and produce a variety of extracellular hydrolytic enzymes (cellulases, hemicelluloses, pectinases, etc.) to directly penetrate the cell wall[36].

      Although in most cases plant-endophytic fungi interactions are beneficial to the host itself, plants still detect signals from microbes and respond appropriately by activating the plant immune system. Plants rely on innate immunity to recognize microbial signaling molecules, which leads to two distinct defense systems: 1) Plants recognize microbe-associated molecular patterns (MAMPs) via pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) localized on the cell surface, which leads to MAMP-triggered immunity (MTI); and 2) intracellular receptors in plants recognize molecules produced by microorganisms (known as effectors), which activate effector-triggered immunity (ETI) response[37]. It is easy to understand that beneficial microorganisms may temporarily circumvent the plant's self-protection mechanisms by evading ETI, or evade recognition by removing or mutating the recognized effectors to facilitate successful colonization of the host root.

      As mentioned above, for the MTI defense system, the response of plants to the very first infections by endophytic fungi is similar to the response of plants to the invasion of pathogenic fungi. In this system, endophytic fungal communities can adapt the behavior of their interactions with the host plants in a self-serving way, thereby maximizing their fitness[3]. Structural modification and mutating the target of the reaction are the most effective methods. A MAMP originating from the fungal cell wall, β-glucan, is capable of triggering the plant immune system. For example, the FGB1 gene of root endophyte Piriformospora indica encodes a secreted fungal specific β-glucan binding lectin, which may change the composition and characteristics of fungal cell walls, thus effectively inhibiting the immunity triggered by β-glucan from different host plants[38]. These findings suggest that endophytic fungi are inherently resistant to defenses generated by their host plants, providing us with a deeper understanding of host-microbe coevolution.

      The non-pathogenicity of endophytic fungi in their hosts is related to the homeostasis of the microecological environment between the endophyte and the host. The mechanisms underlying the interactions between endophytic fungi and the plant immune system are cumbersome, and research in this area is currently limited. The current more complete evolutionary strategies of endophytic fungi from entry to successful colonization in the host can be summarized as either: 1) avoidance and/or suppression of host defense mechanisms and protection from other toxic metabolites produced by the host, or 2) regulation of the growth and virulence of the resident endophytes through quorum sensing and quorum quenching[39] (Fig. 1). We still need to dig deeper into the colonization mechanisms of endophytic fungi within host plants, which will help to facilitate the understanding of the symbiotic relationship between endophytic fungi and host forest trees, with potential for practical application.

    • As an important microbial resource, endophytes not only live in plant tissues without causing disease but also produce a large number of natural active compounds. It has been often misinterpreted that these compounds originate from plants[40,41]. Endophytic fungi are an important class of microorganisms and also one of the least studied. They enhance host resistance to abiotic stresses, diseases, insects, pathogens, and herbivores by producing secondary metabolites with a wide range of biological activities[42]. It is no exaggeration to say that endophytic fungi mark the academic discovery of new reservoirs of chemicals that play unique roles that cannot be replaced by other microorganisms.

      In recent years, the isolation of endophytic fungi and the study of their natural products have received much attention. Endophytic fungi represent a great potential for biodiversity, and they are considered to be a powerful source of new bioactive compounds[43]. Due to the interconnections between endophytic fungi and their hosts, many of the bioactive compounds produced by the former have been classified into different categories[44], including, but not limited to, compounds such as vitamins, polysaccharides, and steroids[45], phytohormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA), gibberellins (GA)[46], and secondary metabolites[47] (Fig. 2). As an example, IAA, a phytohormone with the chemical formula C10H9NO2, plays a pivotal role in coordinating a wide range of growth and developmental processes and physiological responses (e.g. cell elongation, division, and differentiation) in plants. Interestingly, with the intensive study of plant endophytic fungal products, it has been found that certain fungi also possess the ability to produce IAA. Corradi et al. found that the leaf-endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis aff. Neglecta, isolated from Cupressaceae, produces IAA under in vitro conditions, and the production of IAA is significantly increased when co-cultured with specific bacterial strains[48]. It has been shown that Aureobasidium sp. BSS6 and Preussia sp. BSL10 isolated from foliage and stems of frankincense trees showed high potential for IAA production[49]. To verify this discovery, Preussia sp. BSL10 was applied to the host seedlings, and the stem length, leaf number, internodes, and photosynthetic pigment content of the young trees were found to be significantly increased.

      Figure 2. 

      Natural substances produced by endophytic fungi. IAA: Indole acetic acid, GA: Gibberellins.

      These fungi can produce a large number of chemically diverse secondary metabolites that are known to have antimicrobial, antiparasitic, anticancer or antiviral activities[50] (Fig. 2). Some endophytic fungi produce more than 12 metabolites similar to those produced by the host plants, including alkaloids, flavonoids, saponins, peptides, phenolic acids, terpenes, steroids, and other active compounds, and are considered to be potent sources of new compounds[51]. In addition, there are several reports suggesting that endophytic fungi produce substances originating from different biosynthetic pathways and belonging to different structural groups (e.g., terpenoids, steroids, xanthones, quinones, phenols, isocoumarins, tetralones, and cytochalasins)[52]. Among terpenoids, sesquiterpenes are a very diverse and widely distributed subclass of biologically important natural organic compounds in the plant kingdom. Tremulenolide A is a sesquiterpene first isolated from the liquid culture of aspen rotting fungus Phellinus tremulae in quaking aspen[53], and it can also be isolated from the fermentation product of endophytic fungus Flavodon flavus PSU-MA201 from mangroves[54]. The isolation of tremulenolide A from mangrove endophytic fungal cultures was carried out in the same way as for Pestalotiopsis spp. PSU-MA92 and PSU-MA119[55]. Some researchers analyzed the antibacterial activity of tremulenolide A against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC25923 and Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC90113 using a colorimetric broth microdilution assay and found that this sesquiterpene exhibited antibacterial and antifungal activity with a minimum inhibitory concentration value of 128 μg/mL[54]. Most of the new natural compounds, except for the antibacterial activity of tremulenolide A, were found to be of great medicinal value.

      The fact that the unique medicinal composition of plants allows endophytic fungi to produce higher-value natural products, has led to the recognition that they may have a better potential for application. In the past 20 years, many novel bioactive compounds with antimicrobial, antioxidant, and anticancer properties have been successfully isolated and characterized worldwide. This series of breakthroughs not only meets the growing needs of people but also has great significance for the conservation and regeneration of rare woody plant resources.

    • Phytohormones play an important regulatory role in almost all processes of plant growth and development. As mentioned in the previous section, plant endophytic fungi have the ability to produce specific phytohormones. Several reports have shown that the interaction of endophytic fungi with their host plants can produce a wide range of phytohormones that are used as exogenous substances to promote plant growth[56]. In addition to IAA, endophytic fungi of olive trees are known for their potential to promote plant growth[57], which depends on improved nutrient supply and/or production of phytohormones, such as auxin in Discosia sp[58].

      Endophytic fungi also produce other substances that contribute to the growth of host plants, and although they are not classified as phytohormones, they still have a positive impact on plants that cannot be ignored. For example, common endophytic fungi Lasiodiplodia spp., isolated from the leaves of 32 different tree species, not only showed antifungal activity but also produced various types of enzymes such as cellulase and β-glucosidase enzyme[59]. This suggests that Lasiodiplodia spp. from different hosts both have potentially beneficial effects on different trees. Previous studies have shown that as a saprophytic fungus that degrades fallen leaves in dry deciduous forests, Lasiodiplodia can utilize phenylpropanoid precursors and salicylic acid to control host defense, suggesting that they may influence physiological processes in the host plant[60]. Inoculation with endophytic fungi Trichoderma sp. PDR1-7 significantly increased the availability of soil nutrients and growth of Scots pine seedlings, chlorophyll and protein content, and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, probably because Trichoderma sp. releases organic acids and siderophores[61].

      It is undeniable that the endophytic fungi themselves have properties that affect the growth of the host plants. It was shown that 15N content in cacao leaves inoculated with both the pathogenic Mycosphaerella spp. and the protective endophytic fungi Colletotrichum tropicale was significantly higher, and that mixed endophyte-pathogen infections also increased the total biomass. This finding is consistent with previous findings in the same cacao-C. tropicale system, which documented a variety of localized effects of C. tropicale on plant leaves, including altered expression of 115 nitrogen metabolism genes in cacao[62]. Isolates P06 belonging to Helotiales and P04 of Serendipita vermifera both increased the number of root tips and shoot biomass in poplar seedlings[63]. These endophytic fungi confer plants' resistance to heavy metals in the external environment, so they can be considered for use in phytoremediation technologies for heavy metal-contaminated soil.

      Different endophytic fungi can also reach the expectation of promoting plant growth and development through synergistic or inhibitory effects with each other. Field inoculation with the arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) and the endophytic fungi Piriformospora indica was able to partially improve the external (number of fruits per tree and fruit size) and internal (glucose, sucrose, and fructose) qualities of Newhall navel orange[64]. Moreover, branch elongation of young apple trees inoculated with AMF Paraglomus sp. SW1 was accompanied by an increase in the number of AMFs, a significant decrease in the number of Fusarium spp. in the soil, which resulted in an effective mitigation of the negative effects of apple replant disease[65].

    • Plants are inevitably subjected to stress and interference from various biological factors in the environment during their growth, which will result in poor plant growth or even death. Among these factors, biological stress includes biological interference such as pathogenic microorganisms or harmful insects[66]. Most studies have shown that endophytic fungi can not only promote plant growth but also improve plant resistance.

      Certain endophytic fungi may increase the resistance of forest trees to biotic stresses caused by herbivores. The Siberian elm inoculated with endophyte isolate YCB36, an Ascomycete showed decreased proline content, increased stomatal conductance of leaves, and higher concentrations of flavonoids and total phenols in xylem tissues, which indicated that YCB36 induced defensive metabolism of host plants[67]. At present, it is known that some fungal infections are helpful in improving the tolerance of trees to herbivores such as pests. Compared with those without endophytic fungi, the survival rate of juvenile eastern spruce budworm and the amount of fallen needles of trees inoculated with Phialocephala scopiformis were decreased, which indicated that P. scopififormis could effectively control the budding insects of eastern spruce[68,69]. In addition, in the Acadian forests of Canada's coastal provinces, forest plants provide nutrients and shelter for coniferous foliar endophytic fungi with 'foraging ascomycetes', which increase host survival by promoting tolerance of host plants to herbivorous insects or needle pathogens[70].

      When it comes to diseases, endophytic fungi also have excellent biocontrol potential. First, they may compete with pathogens for ecological niches by producing toxic substances that inhibit the pathogenic effects of pathogens. For example, needles of white spruce and white pine infected by toxic endophytic fungi contain varying concentrations of secondary metabolites that are toxic to needle pathogens[71]. The endophytic fungal community of New Zealand apples has the potential to reduce infection by the pathogen Neonectria ditissima, which could potentially be developed as a biological control strategy for European canker[72]. The endophytic fungi Lophodermium nitens, which produces the antifungal compound pyrenophorol, may increase the tolerance of eastern white pine to white pine blister rust[73]. The endophytic fungi studied showed extensive ecological niche overlap with the pathogen, suggesting that some endophytic strains may protect elm trees from Dutch Elm Disease (DED)-pathogens by competing for substrates, which provides a new tool for biological control of DED[74]. Endophytic fungi may improve the growth of American beech by altering the direction of disease progression through feedback on the major causal agents or by changing the symptomatic expression of beech bark disease and rates of tree decline[75]. Secondly, endophytic fungi may directly promote host plant resistance to pathogens. In natural habitats, endophytic fungi are beneficial in helping Brazilian rubber trees to resist pathogenic fungi, and they may exhibit the same ecological functions as antagonists of fungal pathogens in the interleaf[76]. Exposing cocoa seedlings to the leaves of healthy adults enriched the microbiome of the seedlings with Colletotrichum tropicale[77]. This endophytic fungus enhanced the resistance of the seedlings to pathogens by up-regulating the host's defense pathway, and the results showed that the seedlings experienced less pathogen damage after exposure[77]. The experimental objects are also woody plant cacao tree and endophytic fungus Colletotrichum tropicale. Inoculation of endophyte-free cacao leaves with C. tropicale, the predominant leaf endophyte fungi in healthy cocoa, increasing lignin and cellulose content of the inoculated cocoa and a cocoa gene (Tc00g04254) highly up-regulated by C. tropicale conferred resistance of host tissues to pathogen damage[78]. Furthermore, the incidence and severity of damage in silver poplar pretreated with mixed cell suspensions of endophytic fungi (mainly Pleosporales, Dothideales, and Eurotiales) were lower than in the control group, proving that the former had a high level of tolerance to Blackstar[79]. It was suggested that the inoculated endophytic fungal community in silver poplar enhances the host's tolerance to the pathogen, which could be because certain endophytic fungi contribute to defenses downstream of plant genetic resistance mechanisms[79].

    • Abiotic stresses are usually inanimate natural environmental factors, such as sunlight, temperature, or wind, which may cause harm to plants and animals in affected areas. Abiotic stress will affect animals, while plants are especially or even completely dependent on environmental factors, so abiotic stress has a particularly obvious restriction on plants. Plant microbiome can improve plant access to and supply of nutrients and alleviate abiotic stress[80]. It has been shown that endophytic fungi enhance plant adaptation to heavy metal stress by mechanisms including co-evolutionary strategies, immune modulation and detoxification translocation[81].

      Several studies have shown that the presence of endophytic fungi is more favorable for better adaptation of host plants in salt-stressed environments. Inoculation with the endophytic ascomycete Curvularia sp. isolated from the saline plant Suaeda salsa resulted in a simultaneous increase in the activities of SOD and ascorbate peroxidase in Chinese white poplar, indicating that this endophytic fungus could alleviate the effects of salinity stress on white poplar[82]. It was also observed that the colonization of endophytic fungi belonging to the phylum Leotiomycetes and Basidiomycota was increased at sites with higher total phosphorus content. This observation confirms the ability of endophytic fungi, which are usually known to form ectomycorrhizal structures on the roots of European alder under salt stress conditions, to help the host to adapt to salt-stressed environments by accumulating proline and antioxidants and maintaining the plant's water potential[83]. It has been demonstrated for the first time that expression of the TaACCD gene from the bioprophylactic endophytic fungus Trichoderma asperellum ACCC30536 resulted in elevated levels of SOD and peroxidase (POD) and reduced reactive oxygen species accumulation and ethylene synthesis in transgenic poplars compared to non-transgenic plants, which may be responsible for the enhanced salt tolerance of the host[84] (Fig. 3). In addition, endophytic fungi can assist the host to survive in other stressful environments. Experiments shown that root endophytic fungi (including Phialocephala fortinii, Rhizodermea veluwensis, and Rhizoscyphus sp.), in addition to supporting Clethra barbinervis to enhance growth and promote K+ uptake, also increases plant tolerance to heavy metals by secreting glomalin, which binds heavy metals to exclude them from the roots[85] (Fig. 3). Without the root endophytic fungi, C. barbinervis has difficulty growing in heavy metal-contaminated environments and exhibits shrinkage, a symptom of heavy metal poisoning[85].

      Figure 3. 

      Ways to promote the growth and development of woody plants by endophytic fungi. Gs: Stomatal conductance, Tr: Transpiration rate, IAA: Indole acetic acid, SOD: Superoxide dismutase; POD: Peroxidase; DSE: Dark septate endophytes.

    • There is a kind of endophytic fungi that should be mentioned separately, the dark septate endophytes, which are characterized by having black, septate hyphae, and all belong to the group of ascomycetes. The DSE colonize intra- or inter-cellularly in the root, and they are globally distributed, being present in much greater numbers in stressed environments[86].

      Although little is known about the number, classification, and physiological characteristics of this fungal group, it is important that DSE play multiple roles in regulating plant growth, signaling, and stress tolerance[87]. Like other endophytic fungi, DSE promotes the growth and development of woody plants. It has been shown that inoculation of Hedysarum scoparium with different DSE was able to either promote the height and shoot biomass or enhance the stem meristem and total biomass[88]. Secondly, DSE can act as biocontrol fungi to assist tree hosts against harmful pathogens. Infection of Norway spruce seedlings with the DSE Phialocephala sphaeroides and/or the root pathogen Heterobasidion parviporum revealed that DSE promoted root growth and counteracted the effects of H. parviporum on the growth of spruce seedlings[89,90]. The negative effect of H. parviporum on spruce seedling growth was attributed to the strong inhibitory effect of the presence of DSE on H. parviporum transcripts encoding genes related to nutrient acquisition[89,90].

      There are examples of the potential of DSE as beneficial endophytic fungi particularly in the context of abiotic stresses. It was shown that inoculation with both DSE (Cladosporium sp. and Rhyzopycnis vagum) not only increased the height of the physic nut in Pb-contaminated soil by 24.1% and chlorophyll content by 11% to 33%, but also resulted in a higher translocation factor value in the host[91]. Nine DSE strains isolated from the super arid shrub Gymnocarpos przewalskii and inoculated with sand holly, one Darksidea strain, Knufa sp., and Leptosphaeria sp. increased total sand holly biomass; two Paraconiothyrium strains, Phialophora sp. and Embellisia chlamydospora had a significant positive effect on the number of plant branches, potassium and calcium content[92]. This suggests that some DSE strains possess the ability to promote the growth of desert woody plants, indicating that they can be used for vegetation restoration in arid environments.

      For drought-stressed environments, inoculation with DSE can help plants adapt to stress by altering root morphology, mitigating ultrastructural damage, and influencing the balance of endogenous hormones, which is important for the cultivation and preservation of red bean trees[93]. The pigment content, net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance (Gs) and transpiration rate (Tr) of inoculated seedlings were significantly higher than those of non-inoculated seedlings when inoculated with DSE Acrocalymma vagum under sterile drought stress[94] (Fig. 3). It indicates that DSE plays a positive role in the growth and drought tolerance of the seedlings of red bean trees.

      In summary, endophytic fungi interact closely with woody host plants, which provide nutrients and shelter to endophytic fungi, while endophytic fungi secrete bioactive substances to enhance plant growth promotion, increase seed production and strengthen the resistance of forest trees to biotic and abiotic stresses[95,96]. In general, how endophytic fungus contributes positively to woody plants can be broadly categorized as follows: Promoting the growth and development of the trees themselves, responding to biotic stresses and responding to abiotic stresses (Fig. 3).

    • Our group has isolated and purified a variety of endophytic fungi from different parts of C. lanceolata (sapwood, fine roots, coarse roots, etc.) after multi-step surface disinfection. Among these, 22 species have been identified. By reviewing various literatures, we found Talaromyces. verruculosus and T. yunnanensis, Penicillium glabrum, Trichoderma lixii, Cladosporium sphaerospermum, Chaetomium globosum showed favorable characteristics in different host plants, such as promoting plant growth, solubilizing soil organic/inorganic phosphorus, inhibiting plant pathogens, and tolerating heavy metals or saline environments.

      To search for all endophytic fungi isolated from C. lanceolata that may have beneficial functions, our group conducted a series of screening-related experiments. For example, we conducted antagonism experiments against pathogenic fungi in an in vitro medium environment with all the endophytic fungi (Fig. 4). Six known C. lanceolata pathogenic fungi were selected and inoculated in the center of Potato Dextrose Agar medium, and then other endophytic fungi isolated from different parts of C. lanceolata were inoculated into the four corners of the medium. The antagonistic effect of the endophytic fungus on the pathogen was determined by the distance between the pathogens and the endophytes and/or their growth trends after 4 d. Finally, we found that P. glabrum had a significant antagonistic effect on all six pathogens. In addition, our group conducted experiments on the dissolution of organic and inorganic phosphorus (Fig. 4). We also inoculated the endophytic fungus on Pikovskaya medium and Mongina medium respectively. We determined whether the endophytic fungi secreted some phosphorus-solubilizing substances that diffused to the surroundings by observing whether a transparent circle formed around the colony. Subsequently, the diameters of the colonies and the phosphorus solubilizing circles were measured to understand the phosphorus solubilizing ability of these endophytic fungi. We found that P. glabrum formed hyaline rings on both media, suggesting that it might have the ability to antagonize pathogenic fungi and dissolve phosphorus, which had positive effects on the growth and health of C. lanceolata.

      Figure 4. 

      Experiments on the potential beneficial functions of endophytic fungi of Cunninghamia lanceolata. (a)−(f) Antagonism experiments of endophytic fungi against six fir pathogenic fungi, the pathogenic fungi are Fusarium concentricum, Fusarium fujikuroi, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, Colletotrichum cangyuanense, Alternaria kunyuensis, and Alternaria shangdongensis in order. (g)−(i) Inoculation of C. lanceolata endophytic fungi on Pikovskaya medium to test their ability to solubilize inorganic phosphorus. Bar = 1 cm.

      Meanwhile, we have selected target endophytic fungal strains with potential beneficial functions for C. lanceolata growth promotion and C. lanceolata-pathogen-endophytic fungus interactions. Fir seedlings were used as test plants in sterile Petri dishes, greenhouse pots, and field plots, and were inoculated with the target endophytic fungus alone or co-inoculated with the target endophytic fungus and fir pathogens. Plant growth, root morphology, photosynthetic physiology and other indicators were measured after a specific time of planting. Physical morphology and photosynthetic properties as well as nutrient changes from seed to seedling of C. lanceolata were used to investigate the effects of endophytic fungi with potential beneficial functions (in the presence of pathogens) on fir hosts. Aiming at the problems of large-scale withering and succession cropping obstacles of C. lanceolata in some areas, we hope to find effective endophytic fungal strains with potential utilization advantages and provide a scientific basis for promoting the growth of C. lanceolata under natural conditions.

    • With the continuous progress of techniques, our research on beneficial endophytic fungi in woody plants will move to a new stage: 1) To carry out studies on the colonization and function of single endophytic fungus, we will gain a deeper understanding of the effect of host plant-specific screening on the colonization process of endophytic fungi; 2) To use microbiome engineering to select beneficial endophytic fungi as synthetic communities and use them in forest nurseries; 3) By studying the genetic characteristics of endophytic fungi in detail, we can target the modification of endophytic fungi with better plant growth-promoting properties through gene editing and other techniques; 4) From a host perspective, genetic techniques can also be used to select woody plants that are most likely to harbor beneficial endophytes. These directions can not only further improve the quality of forest trees, but also provide new possibilities for improving the efficiency of forestry production. The potential practical application of endophytic fungi in forestry has been widely envisioned. Endophytic fungi will provide trees survival advantages in terms of promoting the growth and development of forest trees as well as resisting biotic and abiotic stresses, including through the production of a variety of metabolites. This review provided new knowledge for scientific research related to the growth and development of woody plants. Future studies can further explore how different beneficial endophytic fungi can be utilized to promote the growth of forest trees and the health of forest ecosystems. We hope that the findings of this article can provide effective references for researchers and practitioners in related fields, and provide theoretical support and practical guidance for the conservation and utilization of forest resources.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Wang K, Hong L; literature collection: Hong L, Wang Q, Zhang J, Chen X, Liu Y; figure preparation: Hong L; draft manuscript preparation: Wang K, Hong L; manuscript revision: Asiegbu F, Wu P, Ma X, Wang K. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • We acknowledge the funding from the Youth Program of Natural Science of Fujian Province, China (Grant No. 2023J05026 to Wang K), visiting Grant to Haixia Joint Center FAFU (Grant No. 118/KFXH23016 to Wang K) and Forestry Peak Discipline Construction Project of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (Grant No. 72202200205).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (4)  References (96)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Hong L, Wang Q, Zhang J, Chen X, Liu Y, et al. 2024. Advances in the beneficial endophytic fungi for the growth and health of woody plants. Forestry Research 4: e028 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0025
    Hong L, Wang Q, Zhang J, Chen X, Liu Y, et al. 2024. Advances in the beneficial endophytic fungi for the growth and health of woody plants. Forestry Research 4: e028 doi: 10.48130/forres-0024-0025

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return