Search
2026 Volume 17
Article Contents
ARTICLE   Open Access    

Thirty new species in Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales from the Eastern Himalayas and Southern China

  • #Authors contributed equally: Yaquan Zhu, Linjiang zhou

More Information
  • Received: 31 July 2025
    Revised: 17 December 2025
    Accepted: 25 December 2025
    Published online: 28 February 2026
    Mycosphere  17 Article number: e001 (2026)  |  Cite this article
  • Corticioid and hydnoid fungi play crucial roles in forest ecosystems, particularly in wood degradation and the formation of symbiotic relationships with plants, and exhibit extremely high species diversity in China. However, the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships among taxa of corticioid and hydnoid fungi remain insufficiently understood. In this study, an extensive survey and sampling was conducted for Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales in subtropical and southern temperate forests of China. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, along with the large and small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA genes (nLSU and nSSU), were used to identify the species and analyze the phylogenetic relationships within different genera, and complemented by a small subunit of mitochondrial rRNA gene sequences (mtSSU) for the genus Thelephora. Morphological and molecular analyses revealed 30 new species across ten genera of Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales. The novel species described in this paper include Hydnellum carnosum, Hyd. hydrangeoides, Hyd. infundibuliforme, Hyd. liantaishanense, Hyd. porphyreum, Hyd. testaceum, Hyd. tomentosum, Hymenochaete baishanzuensis, Lyomyces membranaceus, Neosarcodon atroviolaceus, N. bambusicola, Odontia kunmingensis, Peniophorella alba, Phellodon albospinus, Ph. zonatus, Sarcodon squamulosus, Thelephora angusta, T. bomiensis, T. cacao, T. chayuensis, T. fasciculata, T. latihypha, T. linzhiensis, T. longicystidiata, T. microcarpa, T. nanyigouensis, T. nigromarginata, T. scopiformis, Xylodon albus, and X. bicystidiatus. Descriptions and illustrations of these newly proposed species are provided, along with notes discussing their distinguishing characters and those of their allied taxa in this paper. Additionally, the delimitation and diversity of these taxa in terms of morphology, ecology, and phylogeny are explored. Three keys to the species of Hydnellum, resupinate and upright Thelephora from China are provided.
  • 加载中
  • Supplementary Table S1 A list of species, specimens and GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used in this study.
  • [1] Dai YC. 2011. A revised checklist of corticioid and hydnoid fungi in China for 2010. Mycoscience 52:69−79 doi: 10.1007/S10267-010-0068-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2] Hjortstam K, Larsson KH, Ryvarden L, Eriksson J. 1988. The Corticiaceae of North Europe. Vol. 8. Oslo: Fungiflora. pp. 1450–1631
    [3] Ginns J, Lefebvre MNL. 1993. Lignicolous corticoid fungi (Basidiomycota) of North America: systematics, distribution, and ecology. Mycologia Memoirs 19:1−247 doi: 10.2307/2807250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4] Ginns J. 1998. Genera of the North American Corticiaceae sensu lato. Mycologia 90:1−35 doi: 10.1080/00275514.1998.12026875

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5] Larsson KH. 2007. Re-thinking the classification of corticioid fungi. Mycological research 111:1040−1063 doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2007.08.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6] Hjortstam K, Ryvarden L. 2007. Checklist of corticioid fungi (Basidiomycotina) from the tropics, subtropics and the southern hemisphere. Synopsis fungorum 22:27−146

    Google Scholar

    [7] Kirk P, Cannon P, Minter D, Stalpers J. 2008. Ainsworth & Bisby's Dictionary of the Fungi. 10th Edition. Wallingford, UK: CABI. 771 pp.
    [8] Stalpers JA. 1993. The Aphyllophoraceous fungi. I: Keys to the species of the Thelephorales. Studies in Mycology No. 35. Baarn and Delft, The Netherlands: Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures. 168 pp.
    [9] Hibbett D, Bauer R, Binder M, Giachini AJ, Hosaka K, et al. 2014. Agaricomycetes. In Systematics and Evolution. The mycota VII part A, eds. McLaughlin DJ, Spatafora JW. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 373–412 doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55318-9_14
    [10] Donk MA. 1961. Four new families of Hymenomycetes. Persoonia 1:405−407

    Google Scholar

    [11] Oberwinkler F. 1976. Eine agaricoide Gattung der Thelephorales. Sydowia 28:359−361

    Google Scholar

    [12] Jülich W. 1981. Higher taxa of basidiomycetes. Bibliotheca Mycologica 85:1−485

    Google Scholar

    [13] Song CG, Xu TM, Xu YH, Wang D, Zeng L, et al. 2025. Systematic revision, molecular phylogeny and divergence times of Thelephorales (Basidiomycota). Mycosphere 16:296−422 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14] Chevallier FF. 1826. Flore Générale des Environs de Paris. 1. Paris: Ferra Jeune. pp. XXIV, 1–648
    [15] Watling R, Milne J. 2008. The identity of European and North American Boletopsis spp. (Basidiomycota; Thelephorales, Boletopsidaceae). North American Fungi 3:5−15 doi: 10.2509/naf2008.003.0072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16] Baird R, Wallace LE, Baker G, Scruggs M. 2013. Stipitate hydnoid fungi of the temperate southeastern United States. Fungal Diversity 62:41−114 doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0261-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17] Hattori T. 2001. Type studies of the polypores described by E. J. H. Corner from Asia and West Pacific Areas III. Species described in Trichaptum, Albatrellus, Boletopsis, Diacanthodes, Elmerina, Fomitopsis and Gloeoporus. Mycosience 42:423−431 doi: 10.1007/bf02464338

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18] Singer R, Araujo I, Ivory MH. 1983. The ectotrophically mycorrhizal fungi of the neotropical lowlands, especially Central Amazonia: Litter decomposition and ectomycorrhiza in Amazonian forests II. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 77. Vaduz: J. Cramer Verlag. 352 pp.
    [19] Frey W, Hurka K, Oberwinkler F. (Eds.) 1977. Beiträge zur Biologie der niederen Pflanzen: Systematik, Stammesgeschichte, Ökologie. Stuttgart, New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag. 233 pp.
    [20] Hibbett DS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. Progress toward a phylogenetic classification of the Polyporaceae through parsimony analysis of mitochondrial ribosomal DNA sequences. Canadian Journal of Botany 73:853−861 doi: 10.1139/b95-331

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21] Hibbett DS, Thorn RG. 2001. Basidiomycota: Homobasidiomycetes. In The Mycota VII Part B, Systematics and Evolution, eds. McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. pp. 121–168 doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-10189-6_5
    [22] Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Redhead SA, Johnson JE, James TY, et al. 2002. – One hundred and seventeen clades of euagarics. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 23:357−400. doi: 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00027-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23] Redhead SA, Moncalvo JM, Vilgalys R, Lutzoni F. 2002. Phylogeny of agarics: partial systematics solutions for Bryophilous omphalinoid agarics outside of the Agaricales (Euagarics). Mycotaxon 82:151−168 doi: 10.5962/p.440326

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24] Larsson KH, Larsson E, Kõljalg U. 2004. High phylogenetic diversity among corticioid homobasidiomycetes. Mycological Research 108:983−1002 doi: 10.1017/S0953756204000851

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25] Binder M, Hibbett DS, Larsson KH, Larsson E, Langer E, et al. 2005. The phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom-forming fungi (Homobasidiomycetes). Systematics and Biodiversity 3:113−157 doi: 10.1017/S1477200005001623

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26] Ariyawansa HA, Hyde KD, Jayasiri SC, Buyck B, Thilini Chethana KW, et al. 2015. Fungal diversity notes 111–252 — taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 75:27−274 doi: 10.1007/s13225-015-0346-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27] Zhou LW, Wang XW, Vlasák J, Ren GJ. 2018. Resolution of phylogenetic position of Nigrofomitaceae within Hymenochaetales (Basidiomycota) and Nigrofomes sinomelanoporus sp. nov. (Nigrofomitaceae) from China. MycoKeys 29:1−13 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.29.21250

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28] He MQ, Zhao RL, Hyde KD, Begerow D, Kemler M, et al. 2019. Notes, outline and divergence times of Basidiomycota. Fungal Diversity 99:105−367 doi: 10.1007/s13225-019-00435-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29] Wang XW, May TW, Liu SL, Zhou LW. 2021. Towards a natural classification of Hyphodontia sensu lato and the trait evolution of basidiocarps within Hymenochaetales (Basidiomycota). Journal of Fungi 7:478 doi: 10.3390/jof7060478

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30] Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Dai DQ, Sánchez-García M, Goto BT, et al. 2022. Outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa – 2021. Mycosphere 13:53−453 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/13/1/2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31] Wu F, Zhou LW, Vlasák J, Dai YC. 2022. Global diversity and systematics of Hymenochaetaceae with poroid hymenophore. Fungal Diversity 113:1−192 doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00496-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32] Wang XW, Liu SL, Zhou LW. 2023. An updated taxonomic framework of Hymenochaetales (Agaricomycetes, Basidiomycota). Mycosphere 14:452−496 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/14/1/6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33] Wang XW, Zhou LW. 2023. Umbellaceae fam. nov. (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) for Umbellus sinensis gen. et sp. nov. and three new combinations. Journal of Fungi 10:22 doi: 10.3390/jof10010022

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34] Cho Y, Kim D, Lim YW. 2024. Phylogenetic assessment of understudied families in Hymenochaetales (Basidiomycota, Fungi)—Reporting uncovered species and reflecting the recent taxonomic updates in the Republic of Korea. Journal of Microbiology 62:429−447 doi: 10.1007/s12275-024-00120-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35] Mu YH, Hu YP, Wei YL, Yuan HS. 2020. Hydnaceous fungi of China 8. Morphological and molecular identification of three new species of Sarcodon and a new record from southwest China. MycoKeys 66:83−103

    Google Scholar

    [36] Mu YH, Yu JR, Cao T, Wang XH, Yuan HS. 2021. Multi-gene phylogeny and taxonomy of Hydnellum (Bankeraceae, Basidiomycota) from China. Journal of Fungi 7:818 doi: 10.3390/jof7100818

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37] Lu X, Cao T, Nguyễn TTT, Yuan HS. 2022. Six new species of Tomentella (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) from tropical pine forests in central Vietnam. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:864198 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.864198

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38] Yang SR, Wei YL, Yuan HS. 2023. Molecular phylogeny and morphology reveal four new species of Thelephora (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) from subtropical China, closely related to T. ganbajun. Frontiers in Microbiology 14:1109924 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1109924

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39] Agerer R. 1991. Ectomycorrhizae of Sarcodon imbricatus on Norway spruce and their chlamydospores. Mycorrhiza 1:21−30 doi: 10.1007/BF00205898

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40] Agerer R. 1992. Studies on ectomycorrhizae. 44. The ectomycorrhizae of Boletopisis leucomelaena (Thelephoraceae, Basidiomycetes) and their relationship to those of an unidentified ectomycorrhiza. Nova Hedwigia 55:501−518

    Google Scholar

    [41] Raidl S, Agerer R. 1992. Studien an Ektomykorrhizen XLII. Ontogenie der Rhizomorphen von Laccaria amethystina, Hydnum rufescens und Sarcodon imbricatus [Studies on ectomycorrhizae. 42. The ontogeny of the rhizomorphs of Laccaria amethystina, Hydnum rufescens and Sarcodon imbricatus]. Nova Hedwigia 55:279−307

    Google Scholar

    [42] Visser S. 1995. Ectomycorrhizal fungal succession in jack pine stands following wildfire. New Phytologist 129:389−401 doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.1995.tb04309.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43] Kõljalg U. 1996. Tomentella (Basidiomycota) and related genera in temperate Eurasia. Synopsis Fungorum 9:1−213

    Google Scholar

    [44] Smith SE, Read DJ. 1997. Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. 2nd ed. London and San Diego: Academic Press. 605 pp.
    [45] Horton TR, Bruns TD. 2001. The molecular revolution in ectomycorrhizal ecology: peeking into the black-box. Molecular Ecology 10:1855−1871 doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01333.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46] Harrington TJ, Mitchell DT. 2002. Characterization of Dryas octopetala ectomycorrhizas from limestone karst vegetation, western Ireland. Canadian Journal of Botany 80:970−982 doi: 10.1139/b02-082

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47] Read DJ, Perez-Moreno J. 2003. Mycorrhizas and nutrient cycling in ecosystems – a journey towards relevance? New Phytologist 157:475−492

    Google Scholar

    [48] Mleczko P, Zubek S, Kozak M. 2011. Description of ectomycorrhiza and a new central European locality of the rare hydnoid species Sarcodon leucopus (Pers.) Maas Geest. et Nannf. (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota). Nova Hedwigia 92:257−272 doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2011/0092-0257

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49] Gorjón SP, Greslebin AG. 2012. Type studies of the species of Odontia described by GH Cunningham. New Zealand Journal of Botany 50:289−301 doi: 10.1080/0028825X.2012.681385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50] Boroujeni DS, Hemmatinezhad B. 2015. Review of application and importance of ectomycorrhiza fungi and their role in the stability of ecosystems. Biosciences Biotechnology Research Asia 12:153−158 doi: 10.13005/bbra/1646

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51] Kuhar F, Barroetaveña C, Rajchenberg M. 2016. New species of Tomentella (Thelephorales) from the Patagonian Andes forests. Mycologia 108:780−790 doi: 10.3852/15-244

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52] Bucher VVC, Hyde KD, Pointing SB, Reddy CA. 2004. Production of wood decay enzymes, mass loss and lignin solubilization in wood by marine ascomycetes and their anamorphs. Fungal Diversity 15:1−14 doi: 10.1017/s0953756203007329

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53] James TY, Stajich JE, Hittinger CT, Rokas A. 2020. Toward a fully resolved fungal tree of life. Annual Review of Microbiology 74:291−313 doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-022020-051835

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54] Liu S, Chen YY, Sun YF, He XL, Song CG, et al. 2023. Systematic classification and phylogenetic relationships of the brown-rot fungi within the Polyporales. Fungal Diversity 118:1−94 doi: 10.1007/s13225-022-00511-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55] Otto P. 1990. Die terrestrischen Stachelpilze der DDR — Taxonomie, Ökologie, Verbreitung und Rückgang. Thesis. Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Germany.
    [56] Arnolds E. 1991. Decline of ectomycorrhizal fungi in Europe. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 35:209−244 doi: 10.1016/0167-8809(91)90052-Y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57] Arnolds E. 2003. De Stekelzwammen en Pruikzwammen van Nederland en België. Coolia 46:1−96

    Google Scholar

    [58] Arnolds E. 2010. The fate of hydnoid fungi in the Netherlands and Northwestern Europe. Fungal Ecology 3:81−88 doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2009.05.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59] Hrouda P. 1999. Hydnaceous fungi of the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Czech Mycology 51:99−155 doi: 10.33585/cmy.51202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60] European Council for the Conservation of Fungi (ECCF). 2011. Red Lists. www.eccf.eu/redlists-en.ehtml
    [61] Benkert D, Dörfelt H, Hardtke HJ, Hirsch G, Kreisel H, et al. 1992. Rote Liste der gefährdeten Großpilze in Deutschland. Eching: Deutsche Gesellschaft für Mykologie e. V. & Naturschutzbund Deutschland e. V. (NABU). 144 pp.
    [62] Wojewoda W, Lawrynowicz M. 2006. Red list of the macrofungi in Poland [Czerwona lista grzybów wielkoowocnikowych w Polsce]. In Czerwona lista roślin i grzybów Polski. Kraków: W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences. pp. 53–70
    [63] Smith JH, Suz LM, Ainsworth MA. 2016. Red List of Fungi for Great Britain: Bankeraceae, Cantharellaceae, Geastraceae, Hericiaceae and selected genera of Agaricaceae (Battarrea, Bovista, Lycoperdon & Tulostoma) and Fomitopsidaceae. Independent Report. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew.
    [64] Wang D, Feng H, Zhou J, Liu TH, Zhang ZY, et al. 2024. New insights into the stipitate hydnoid fungi Sarcodon, Hydnellum, and the formerly informally defined Neosarcodon, with emphasis on the edible species marketed in Southwest China. IMA Fungus 15:8 doi: 10.1186/s43008-023-00138-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65] Ling ZL, Ma XB, Zhao RL, Cao B, Huang CY, et al. 2025. Overview of the Chinese edible fungi industry of and developing trends analysis. Mycosphere 16:2712−2775 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/16/1/17

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66] Han XQ, Wu XM, Chai XY, Chen D, Dai H, et al. 2011. Isolation, characterization and immunological activity of a polysaccharide from the fruit bodies of an edible mushroom, Sarcodon aspratus (Berk.) S. Ito. Food Research International 44:489−493 doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2010.06.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67] Marcotullio MC. 2011. Sarcodon mushrooms: biologically active metabolites. In Phytochemicals–bioactivities and impact on health. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech Europe. pp. 77–94 doi: 10.5772/27477
    [68] Chen Y, Hu M, Wang C, Yang Y, Chen J, et al. 2013. Characterization and in vitro antitumor activity of polysaccharides from the mycelium of Sarcodon aspratus. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 52:52−58 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2012.09.005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69] Ma K, Han J, Bao L, Wei T, Liu HW. 2014. Two sarcoviolins with antioxidative and α-glucosidase inhibitory activity from the edible mushroom Sarcodon leucopus collected in Tibet. Journal of Natural Products 77:942−947 doi: 10.1021/np401026b

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70] Wang SL, Wang KY, Chen DF, Zhao L. 2014. Influence of Sarcodon imbricatus polysaccharide on immune function in immunosuppressive mouse. Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research 6:1723−1726

    Google Scholar

    [71] Wang SM, Han JJ, Ma K, Jin T, Bao L, et al. 2014. New α-glucosidase inhibitors with p-terphenyl skeleton from the mushroom Hydnellum concrescens. Fitoterapia 98:149−155 doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2014.07.019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72] Chung MY, Hwang JT, Kim JH, Shon DH, Kim HK. 2016. Sarcodon aspratus extract ameliorates dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis in mouse colon and mesenteric lymph nodes. Journal of Food Science 81:H1301−H1308 doi: 10.1111/1750-3841.13297

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73] Xu PJ, Meng FX, Tang M, Ma HY, Li YH, et al. 2017. Preparation of polysaccharides from Sarcodon imbricatus and their in vitro antioxidant activity. China Brewing 36:150−155 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [74] Wang X, Chu Q, Jiang X, Yu Y, Wang L, et al. 2018. Sarcodon imbricatus polysaccharides improve mouse hematopoietic function after cyclophosphamide-induced damage via G-CSF mediated JAK2/STAT3 pathway. Cell Death and Disease 9:578 doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0634-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75] Wang DD, Pan WJ, Mehmood S, Cheng XD, Chen Y. 2018. Polysaccharide isolated from Sarcodon aspratus induces RAW264.7 activity via TLR4-mediated NF-κB and MAPK signaling pathways. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 120:1039−1047 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.08.147

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76] Xu DP, Zheng J, Zhou Y, Li Y, Li S, et al. 2016. Extraction of natural antioxidants from the Thelephora ganbajun mushroom by an ultrasound-assisted extraction technique and evaluation of antiproliferative activity of the extract against human cancer cells. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 17:2−15 doi: 10.3390/ijms17101664

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77] Zheng L, Ma Y, Zhang Y, Meng Q, Yang J, et al. 2020. Distribution of Zinc in mycelial cells and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of mycelia Zinc polysaccharides from Thelephora ganbajun TG-01. Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2020:2308017 doi: 10.1155/2020/2308017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78] Liu F, Wang Y, Zhang K, Wang Y, Zhou R, et al. 2017. A novel polysaccharide with antioxidant, HIV protease inhibiting and HIV integrase inhibiting activities from Fomitiporia punctata (P.karst. ) murrill (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 97:339−347 doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79] Chen W, Tan H, Liu Q, Zheng X, Zhang H, et al. 2019. A review: The bioactivities and pharmacological applications of Phellinus linteus. Molecules 24:1888 doi: 10.3390/molecules24101888

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80] He P, Zhang Y, Li N. 2021. The phytochemistry and pharmacology of medicinal fungi of the genus Phellinus: a review. Food & Function 12:1856−1881 doi: 10.1039/D0FO02342F

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81] Zhao Y, Zheng W. 2021. Deciphering the antitumoral potential of the bioactive metabolites from medicinal mushroom Inonotus obliquus. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 265:113321 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2020.113321

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82] Zhou LW, Ghobad-Nejhad M, Tian XM, Wang YF, Wu F. 2020. Current status of 'Sanghuang' as a group of medicinal mushrooms and their perspective in industry development. Food Reviews International 38:589−607 doi: 10.1080/87559129.2020.1740245

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83] Tang SJ, Shao CX, Yang Y, Ren R, Jin L, et al. 2023. The antitumor effect of mycelia extract of the medicinal macrofungus Inonotus hispidus on HeLa cells via the mitochondrial-mediated pathway. Journal of Ethnopharmacology 311:116407 doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2023.116407

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84] Abdala-Díaz RT, Casas-Arrojo V, Castro-Varela P, Riquelme C, Carrillo P, et al. 2024. Immunomodulatory, antioxidant, and potential anticancer activity of the polysaccharides of the fungus Fomitiporia chilensis. Molecules 29:3628 doi: 10.3390/molecules29153628

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85] Sun HL, Liu DS, Cheng GD, Li JJ, Shi YF. 1997. Comment on the research of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in China. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences 4:283−285 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar

    [86] Piao SL, Liu Q, Chen AP, Janssens IA, Fu YS, et al. 2019. Plant phenology and global climate change: current progresses and challenges. Global Change Biology 25:1922−1940 doi: 10.1111/gcb.14619

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87] Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. 2000. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853−858. doi: 10.1038/35002501

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88] Wang K, Zhang C, Chen H, Yue Y, Zhang W, et al. 2019. Karst landscapes of China: patterns, ecosystem processes and services. Landscape Ecology 34:2743−2763 doi: 10.1007/s10980-019-00912-w

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89] He SH, Li HJ. 2011. Two new species of Hymenochaete (Hymenochaetales) from China. Mycotaxon 115:375−382 doi: 10.5248/115.375

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90] Zhou LW, Kõljalg U. 2013. A new species of Lenzitopsis (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) and its phylogenetic placement. Mycoscience 54:87−92 doi: 10.1016/j.myc.2012.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91] Song CG, Ji X, Liu S, He XL, Cui BK. 2021. Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of Phellodon (Thelephorales) with descriptions of four new species from Southwest China. Forests 12:932 doi: 10.3390/f12070932

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92] Song CG, Chen YY, Liu S, Xu TM, He XL, et al. 2022. A phylogenetic and taxonomic study on Phellodon (Bankeraceae, Thelephorales) from China. Journal of Fungi 8:429 doi: 10.3390/jof8050429

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93] Song CG, Sun YF, Liu S, Chen YY, Cui BK. 2022. Phylogenetic analyses and morphological studies reveal four new species of Phellodon (Bankeraceae, Thelephorales) from China. Journal of Fungi 9:30 doi: 10.3390/jof9010030

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94] Song CG, Sun YF, Wu DM, Gao N, Liu S, et al. 2022. Morphology and molecular phylogeny reveal five new species of Hydnellum (Bankeraceae, Thelephorales) from China. Frontiers in Microbiology 13:1−22 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1049007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95] Zhou HM, Zhao Q, Wang Q, Wu F, Dai YC. 2022. Two new species of Boletopsis (Bankeraceae, Thelephorales) from Southwest China. MycoKeys 89:155−169 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.89.83197

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96] Lei L, Luangharn T, Yu FM, Li WJ, Zhao Q. 2023. A novel hydnoid species of Hydnellum (Bankeraceae, Thelephorales) from southwest China. Phytotaxa 600:291−300 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.600.5.4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97] Tian MZ, Xia HB, Gao ZL, Zhao CY, Ma D, et al. 2024. Four new species and one new record of Thelephora from China. Journal of Fungi 10:300 doi: 10.3390/jof10040300

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98] Zhang X, Li Y, Wang Y, Xu Z, Zhao C, et al. 2024. Xylodon asiaticus (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota), a new species of corticioid fungus from southern China. Phytotaxa 634:1−15 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.634.1.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99] Zhang X, Shi F, Zhang S, Hosen MI, Zhao C. 2024. The diversity and taxonomy of Thelephoraceae (Basidiomycota) with descriptions of four species from southwestern China. Journal of Fungi 10:775 doi: 10.3390/jof10110775

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100] Zhou LJ, Li XL, Yuan HS. 2024. Three new wood-inhabiting fungi of Botryobasidium (Cantharellales, Basidiomycota) from subtropical forests of Southwestern China. MycoKeys 109:337−354 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.109.133325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101] Zhu YQ, Li XL, Zhao DX, Wei YL, Yuan HS. 2024. Four new species of Tomentella (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) from subtropical forests in Southwestern China. Journal of Fungi 10:440 doi: 10.3390/jof10070440

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102] Yuan HS, Lu X, Dai YC, Hyde KD, Kan YH, et al. 2020. Fungal diversity notes 1277–1386: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 104:1−266 doi: 10.1007/s13225-020-00461-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103] Kornerup A, Wanscher J. 1981. Methuen handbook of colour. Norwich: Fletcher & Son Ltd. pp. 1–252
    [104] White TJ, Bruns TD, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications, eds. Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky J, White TJ. USA: Academic Press. pp. 315−322 doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-372180-8.50042-1
    [105] Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. Journal of bacteriology 172:4238−4246 doi: 10.1128/jb.172.8.4238-4246.1990

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106] Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Molecular Biology and Evolution 33:1870−1874 doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107] Katoh K, Rozewicki J, Yamada KD. 2019. MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization. Briefings in Bioinformatics 20:1160−1166 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbx108

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108] Hall TA. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41:95−98

    Google Scholar

    [109] Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, et al. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61:539−542 doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110] Stamatakis A. 2014. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30:1312−1313 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111] Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. 2008. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web servers. Systematic Biology 57:758−771 doi: 10.1080/10635150802429642

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112] Fries EM. 1815. Observationes mycologicae. Havniae: sumptibus G. Bonnieri. pp. 1–230 doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.112534
    [113] Banker HJ. 1902. A historical review of the proposed genera of the Hydnaceae. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 29:436−448 doi: 10.2307/2478543

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114] Maas Geesteranus RA. 1975. Die terrestrischen Stachelpilze Europas (The terrestrial hydnums of Europe). Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Natuurkunde, Tweede Reeks 65:1−127

    Google Scholar

    [115] Niemelä T, Kinnunen J, Renvall P, Schigel DS. 2003. Phellodon secretus (Basidiomycota), a new hydnaceous fungus from northern pine woodlands. Karstenia 43:37−44 doi: 10.29203/ka.2003.391

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116] Baird RE, Wallace LE, Baker G. 2013. Stipitate hydnums of the southern United States 1: Phellodon mississippiensis sp. nov. Mycotaxon 123:183−191 doi: 10.5248/123.183

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117] Svantesson S, Larsson E, Larsson KH, Parfitt D, Suz LM, et al. 2025. The genus Phellodon (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) in Europe: four new species, one new combination, four new typifications and a first European record. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 15:1−45 doi: 10.3114/fuse.2025.15.01

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118] Mu YH, Wu F, Yuan HS. 2019. Hydnaceous fungi of China 7. Morphological and molecular characterization of Phellodon subconfluens sp. nov. from temperate, deciduous forests. Phytotaxa 414:280−288 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.414.6.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119] Fries EM. 1821. Systema mycologicum: sistens fungorum ordines, genera et species, huc usque cognitas, quas ad normam methodi naturalis determinavit . Lundae: Ex Officina Berlingiana. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.5378
    [120] Karsten PA. 1879. Symbolae ad mycologiam Fennicam. Meddelanden af Societas pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 5:15−46

    Google Scholar

    [121] Harrison KA. 1961. The stipitate Hydnums of Nova Scotia. Ottawa, Canada: Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture. pp. 1−60 doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.58911
    [122] Harrison KA. 1964. New or little known North American stipitate hydnums. Canadian Journal of Botany 42:1205−1233 doi: 10.1139/b64-116

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123] Maas Geesteranus RA. 1962. Hyphal structures in Hydnums. Persoonia 2:377−405

    Google Scholar

    [124] Maas Geesteranus RA. 1971. Hydnaceous fungi of the Eastern Old World. Monograph in Verhandelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Natuurkunde, Tweede Reeks 60. Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences, Netherlands. pp. 1−176
    [125] Matheny PB, Curtis JM, Hofstetter V, Aime MC, Moncalvo JM, et al. 2006. Major clades of Agaricales: a multilocus phylogenetic overview. Mycologia 98:982−995 doi: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832627

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126] Tedersoo L, May TW, Smith ME. 2010. Ectomycorrhizal lifestyle in fungi: global diversity, distribution, and evolution of phylogenetic lineages. Mycorrhiza 20:217−263 doi: 10.1007/s00572-009-0274-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [127] Larsson KH, Svantesson S, Miscevic D, Kõljalg U, Larsson E. 2019. Reassessment of the generic limits for Hydnellum and Sarcodon (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota). MycoKeys 54:31−47 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.54.35386

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [128] Nitare J, Ainsworth AM, Larsson E, Parfitt D, Suz LM, et al. 2021. Four new species of Hydnellum (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) with a note on Sarcodon illudens. Fungal Systematics and Evolution 7:233−254 doi: 10.3114/fuse.2021.07.12

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [129] Grupe AC, Vasco-Palacios AM, Smith ME, Boekhout T, Henkel TW. 2016. Sarcodon in the Neotropics II: four new species from Colombia and a key to the regional species. Mycologia 108:791−805 doi: 10.3852/15-254

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [130] Grupe AC, Baker AD, Uehling JK, Smith ME, Baroni TJ, et al. 2015. Sarcodon in the Neotropics I: new species from Guyana, Puerto Rico, and Belize. Mycologia 107:591−606 doi: 10.3852/14-185

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [131] Morgan AP. 1895. New North American fungi. Journal of the Cincinnati Society of Natural History 18:36−45

    Google Scholar

    [132] Karsten PA. 1881. Enumeratio Boletinearum et Polyporearum Fennicarum, systemate novo dispositarum. Revue Mycologique Toulouse 3:16−19

    Google Scholar

    [133] Karsten PA. 1881. Enumeratio Thelephorearum Fr.et Clavariearum Fr. Fennicarum, systemate novo dispositarum. Revue Mycologique Toulouse 3:21−23

    Google Scholar

    [134] Banker HJ. 1906. A contribution to a revision of the North American Hydnaceae. Memoirs of the Torrey Botanical Club 12:99−194 doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.97394

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [135] Douch JK, Vaughan LJ, Cooper JA, Holmes GD, Robinson R, et al. 2024. Taxonomic revision of fleshy species of Hydnellum, Neosarcodon, and Sarcodon (Thelephorales) from Australasia. Mycologia 116:965−992 doi: 10.1080/00275514.2024.2363211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [136] Pérez-De-Gregorio MÀ, Macau N, Carbó J. 2011. Sarcodon quercinofibulatum, una nueva especie del género con hifas fibulíferas. Revista Catalana de Micologia 33:25−30

    Google Scholar

    [137] Maas Geesteranus RA, Nannfeldt JA. 1969. The genus Sarcodon in Sweden in the light of recent investigations. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift 63:401−440

    Google Scholar

    [138] Tedersoo L, Bahram M, Ryberg M, Otsing E, Kõljalg U, et al. 2014. Global biogeography of the ectomycorrhizal/sebacina lineage (Fungi, Sebacinales) as revealed from comparative phylogenetic analyses. Molecular Ecology 23:4168−4183

    Google Scholar

    [139] Yuan Y, Wu F, Dai YC, Qin WM, Yuan HS. 2018. Odontia aculeata and O. sparsa, two new species of tomentelloid fungi (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) from the secondary forests of Northeast China. Phytotaxa 372:183−192 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.372.3.1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [140] Boonmee S, Wanasinghe DN, Calabon MS, Huanraluek N, Chandrasiri SKU, et al. 2021. Fungal diversity notes 1387–1511: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 111:1−335 doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00489-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [141] Rodway L. 1897. Tasmanian fungi. Papers & Proceedings of the Royal Society of Tasmania 1897:129−144 doi: 10.26749/ixqf8781

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [142] Larsen MJ. 1974. A contribution to the taxonomy of the genus Tomentella. Mycologia Memoirs 4:1−145 doi: 10.2307/4109015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [143] Kõljalg U, Larsson E. 1998. Pseudotomentella ochracea sp. nov. , based on morphological and molecular data. Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 33:53−56

    Google Scholar

    [144] Willdenow CL. 1787. Florae Berolinensis Prodromus. Braunschweig: Vieweg. pp. 1–439
    [145] Corner EJH. 1968. A monograph of Thelephora (Basidiomycetes). Nova Hedwigia 27:1−110

    Google Scholar

    [146] Corner EJH. 1976. Further notes on cantharelloid fungi and Thelephora. Nova Hedwigia 27:325−342 doi: 10.1127/nova.hedwigia/27/1976/325

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [147] Vizzini A, Angelini C, Losi C, Ercole E. 2016. Thelephora dominicana (Basidiomycota, Thelephorales), a new species from the Dominican Republic, and preliminary notes on thelephoroid genera. Phytotaxa 265:27−38 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.265.1.2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [148] Ramírez-López I, Villegas-Ríos M, Salas-Lizana R, Garibay-Orijel R, Alvarez-Manjarrez J. 2015. Thelephora versatilis and Thelephora pseudoversatilis: two new cryptic species with polymorphic basidiomes inhabiting tropical deciduous and sub-perennial forests of the Mexican Pacific coast. Mycologia 107:346−358 doi: 10.3852/14-151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [149] Li T, Li T, Song B, Hosen MI. 2020. Thelephora austrosinensis (Thelephoraceae), a new species close to T. ganbajun from southern China. Phytotaxa 471:208−220 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.471.3.3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [150] Zecchin G. 2008. Genere Thelephora in Friuli-Ottavo contributo. Rivista di Micologia 51:117−125

    Google Scholar

    [151] Kõljalg U, Saar I, Svantesson S. 2024. Merging the genus Tomentella with Thelephora (Fungi, Thelephorales). Folia Cryptogamica Estonica 61:67−86 doi: 10.12697/fce.2024.61.09

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [152] Corner EJH. 1986. The genus Clavulina (Basidiomycetes) in Southeastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 34:103−106 doi: 10.1071/bt9860103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [153] Stalpers JA. 1984. A revision of the genus Sporotrichum. Studies in Mycology 24:1−105 doi: 10.1016/s0007-1536(85)80103-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [154] Lu X, Yuan HS. 2021. New species of Tomentella (Thelephorales, Basidiomycota) from temperate continental mountain climate of China (Xinjiang region). Forests 12:1531 doi: 10.3390/f12111531

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [155] Donk MA. 1933. Revision der niederländischen Homobasidiomycetae-Aphyllophoraceae. Mededelingen van het Botanisch Museum en Herbarium van de Rijksuniversiteit te Utrecht 9:1−278

    Google Scholar

    [156] Sha T, Xu JP, Palanichamy MG, Zhang HB, Li T, et al. 2008. Genetic diversity of the endemic gourmet mushroom Thelephora ganbajun from south-western China. Microbiology 15:3460−3468 doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/020495-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [157] Wang R, Herrera M, Xu WJ, Zhang P, Moreno JP, et al. 2022. Ethnomycological study on wild mushrooms in Pu'er prefecture, Southwest Yunnan, China. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine 18:55 doi: 10.1186/s13002-022-00551-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [158] Patouillard N. 1900. Essai taxonomique sur les familles et les genres des Hyménomycètes. France: Lons-le-Saunier. doi: 10.5962/bhl.title.40287
    [159] Burt EA. 1918. The Thelephoraceae of North America. X. Hymenochaete. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 5:301−372 doi: 10.2307/2989968

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [160] Cunningham GH. 1957. Thelephoraceae of New Zealand (parts XII, XIII). Part XII: the genera Thelephora and Tomentella. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 84:479−496

    Google Scholar

    [161] Escobar GA. 1978. Contribution towards a monograph of the neotropical species of Hymenochaete. Dissertation. University of Washington, U.S.
    [162] Léger JC. 1998. Le genre Hymenochaete Léveille. Bibliotheca Mycologica. Berlin: J. Cramer.
    [163] Parmasto E. 1995. Corticioid fungi: a cladistic study of a paraphyletic group. Canadian Journal of Botany 73:843−852 doi: 10.1139/b95-330

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [164] Larsson KH, Parmasto E, Fischer M, Langer E, Nakasone KK, et al. 2006. Hymenochaetales: a molecular phylogeny for the hymenochaetoid clade. Mycologia 98:926−936 doi: 10.1080/15572536.2006.11832622

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [165] Liu ZB, Yuan Y, Dai YC, Liu HG, Vlasák J, et al. 2025. Global diversity and systematics of Hymenochaetaceae with non-poroid hymenophore. Fungal Diversity 131:1−97 doi: 10.1007/s13225-025-00552-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [166] Nie T, Tian Y, Liu SL, Yang J, He SH. 2017. Species of Hymenochaete (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) on bamboos from East Asia, with descriptions of two new species. MycoKeys 20:51−65 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.20.11754

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [167] Karsten PA. 1889. Kritisk öfversigt af Finlands Basidsvampar (Basidiomycetes; Gastero- & Hymenomycetes). Bidrag till Kä nnedom av Finlands Natur och Folk 48:1−470

    Google Scholar

    [168] Larsson KH. 2007. Molecular phylogeny of Hyphoderma and the reinstatement of Peniophorella. Mycological Research 111:186−195 doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2006.10.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [169] Justo A, Miettinen O, Floudas D, Ortiz-Santana B, Sjökvist E, et al. 2017. A revised family-level classification of the Polyporales (Basidiomycota). Fungal Biology 121:798−824 doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2017.05.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [170] Yurchenko E, Wu SH, Maekawa N. 2020. Three new species of Peniophorella (Basidiomycota) from East Asia. Nova Hedwigia 111:473−495 doi: 10.1127/nova_hedwigia/2020/0598

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [171] Olariaga I, Huhtinen S, Læssøe T, Petersen JH, Hansen K. 2020. Phylogenetic origins and family classification of typhuloid fungi, with emphasis on Ceratellopsis, Macrotyphula and Typhula (Basidiomycota). Studies in Mycology 96:155−184 doi: 10.1016/j.simyco.2020.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [172] Wu SH. 1997. New species and new records of Hyphoderma (Basidiomycotina) from Taiwan. Botanical Bulletin of the Academia Sinica 38:63−72

    Google Scholar

    [173] Yurchenko E, Wu SH. 2016. A key to the species of Hyphodontia sensu lato. MycoKeys 12:1−27 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.12.7568

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [174] Wang M, Chen YY. 2017. Phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Hyphodontia (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) in China. Phytotaxa 309:45−54 doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.309.1.4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [175] Yurchenko E, Wu SH. 2014. Three new species of Hyphodontia with peg-like hyphal aggregations. Mycological Progress 13:533−545 doi: 10.1007/s11557-013-0935-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [176] Riebesehl J, Langer E. 2017. Hyphodontia s. l. (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota): 35 new combinations and new keys to all 120-current species. Mycological Progress 16:637−666 doi: 10.1007/s11557-017-1299-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [177] Guan QX, Huang J, Huang J, Zhao CL. 2023. Five new species of Schizoporaceae (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) from East Asia. MycoKeys 96:25−56 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.96.99327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [178] Dong JH, Li Q, Yuan Q, Luo YX, Zhang XC, et al. 2024. Species diversity, taxonomy, molecular systematics and divergence time of wood-inhabiting fungi in Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, Asia. Mycosphere 15:1110−1293 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/15/1/10

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [179] Yurchenko E, Langer E, Riebesehl J. 2024. A high species diversity of Lyomyces (Basidiomycota, Hymenochaetales) in Central and South America, revealed after morphological and molecular analysis. MycoKeys 109:131−169 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.109.127606

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [180] Hjortstam K, Ryvarden L. 2002. Studies in tropical corticioid fungi (Basidiomycotina, Aphyllophorales) Alutaceodontia, Botryodontia, Hyphodontia s. s. and Kneiffiella. Synopsis Fungorum 15:7−17

    Google Scholar

    [181] Hjortstam K, Ryvarden L. 2009. A preliminary checklist of Aphyllophorales from the Seychelles. Synopsis Fungorum 26:10−23

    Google Scholar

    [182] Riebesehl J, Yurchenko E, Nakasone KK, Langer E. 2019. Phylogenetic and morphological studies in Xylodon (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota) with the addition of four new species. MycoKeys 47:97−137 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.47.31130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [183] Yurchenko E, Xiong HX, Wu SH. 2013. Four new species of Hyphodontia (Xylodon ss. Hjortstam & Ryvarden, Basidiomycota) from Taiwan. Nova Hedwigia 96:545−558 doi: 10.1127/0029-5035/2013/0092

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [184] Bernicchia A, Gorjón SP. 2010. Fungi Europaei 12: Corticiaceae s. l. Alassio, Italy: Edizioni Candusso. pp. 1–1008
    [185] Viner I, Spirin V, Zíbarová L, Larsson KH. 2018. Additions to the taxonomy of Lagarobasidium and Xylodon (Hymenochaetales, Basidiomycota). MycoKeys 23:65−90 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.41.28987

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [186] Yuan Q, Zhao C. 2024. Morphology and multigene phylogeny revealed four new species of Xylodon (Schizoporaceae, Basidiomycota) from Southern China. MycoKeys 107:161−187 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.107.128223

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [187] Lizon P. 1993. Decline of macrofungi in Europe: an overview. Transactions of the Mycological Society of Republic of China 8:21−48

    Google Scholar

    [188] Newton AC, Holden E, Davy LM, Ward SD, Fleming LV, et al. 2002. Status and distribution of stipitate hydnoid fungi in Scottish coniferous forests. Biological Conservation 107:181−192 doi: 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00060-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [189] van der Linde S, Alexander I, Anderson IC. 2008. A PCR-based method for detecting the mycelia of stipitate hydnoid fungi in soil. Journal of Microbiological Methods 75:40−46 doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2008.04.010

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [190] Hrouda P. 2005. Bankeraceae in Central Europe. 1. Czech Mycology 57:57−78 doi: 10.33585/cmy.57103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [191] Hrouda P. 2005. Bankeraceae in Central Europe. 2. Czech Mycology 57:279−297 doi: 10.33585/cmy.57308

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [192] Walleyn R, Verbeken A. 2000. Een gedocumenteerde Rode Lijst van enkele groepen paddestoelen (macrofungi) van Vlaanderen [A documented Red List of some groups of fungi (macrofungi) in Flanders]. Mededelingen van het Instituut voor Natuurbehoud. vol. 7. Brussels: Instituut voor Natuurbehoud. pp. 1–84. http://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-125568
    [193] Nitare J. 2006. Åtgärdsprogram för bevarande av rödlistade fjälltaggsvampar (Sarcodon) [Action program for conservation of red-listed mountain hydnum fungi (Sarcodon)]. Rapport 5609. Stockholm: Naturvårdsverket. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:naturvardsverket:diva-9826
    [194] Senn-Irlet B, Bieri G, Egli S. 2007. Rote Liste Grosspilze. Rote Liste der gefährdeten Arten der Schweiz [Red List of Macrofungi. Red List of Threatened Species of Switzerland]. Umwelt-Vollzug Nr. 0718. Bern & Birmensdorf, Switzerland: Bundesamt für Umwelt (BAFU) & WSL. 92 pp. https://www.dora.lib4ri.ch/wsl/islandora/object/wsl%3A10349
    [195] Kõljalg U, Renvall P. 2000. Hydnellum gracilipes: a link between stipitate and resupinate Hymenomycetes. Karstenia 40:71−77 doi: 10.29203/ka.2000.355

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [196] Cooper J, Leonard P. 2012. Boletopsis nothofagi sp. nov. associated with Nothofagus in the Southern Hemisphere. MycoKeys 3:13−22 doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.3.2762

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [197] Hahn CJ, Friebes G, Krisai-Greilhuber I. 2018. Sarcodon fennicus, a boreo-montane stipitate hydnoid fungus with a remarkable smell. Austrian Mycological Society 27:43−52

    Google Scholar

    [198] Wijayawardene NN, Hyde KD, Al-Ani LKT, Tedersoo L, Haelewaters D, et al. 2020. Outline of fungi and fungus-like taxa. Mycosphere 11:1060−1456 doi: 10.5943/mycosphere/11/1/8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [199] He MQ, Zhao RL, Liu DM, Denchev TT, Begerow D, et al. 2022. Species diversity of Basidiomycota. Fungal Diversity 114:281−325 doi: 10.1007/s13225-021-00497-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [200] Jayawardena RS, Hyde KD, Wang S, Sun Y, Suwannarach N, et al. 2023. Fungal diversity notes 1512–1610: taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions on genera and species of fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 117:1−272 doi: 10.1007/s13225-022-00513-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [201] Zhao C, Qu M, Huang R, Karunarathna SC. 2023. Multi-gene phylogeny and taxonomy of the wood-rotting fungal genus Phlebia sensu lato (Polyporales, Basidiomycota). Journal of Fungi 9:320 doi: 10.3390/jof9030320

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhu Y, Zhou L, Liu J, Yuan Y, Wei Y, et al. 2026. Thirty new species in Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales from the Eastern Himalayas and Southern China. Mycosphere 17: e001 doi: 10.48130/mycosphere-0026-0001
    Zhu Y, Zhou L, Liu J, Yuan Y, Wei Y, et al. 2026. Thirty new species in Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales from the Eastern Himalayas and Southern China. Mycosphere 17: e001 doi: 10.48130/mycosphere-0026-0001

Figures(69)  /  Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(834) PDF downloads(313)

ARTICLE   Open Access    

Thirty new species in Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales from the Eastern Himalayas and Southern China

Mycosphere  17 Article number: e001  (2026)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Corticioid and hydnoid fungi play crucial roles in forest ecosystems, particularly in wood degradation and the formation of symbiotic relationships with plants, and exhibit extremely high species diversity in China. However, the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships among taxa of corticioid and hydnoid fungi remain insufficiently understood. In this study, an extensive survey and sampling was conducted for Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales in subtropical and southern temperate forests of China. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, along with the large and small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA genes (nLSU and nSSU), were used to identify the species and analyze the phylogenetic relationships within different genera, and complemented by a small subunit of mitochondrial rRNA gene sequences (mtSSU) for the genus Thelephora. Morphological and molecular analyses revealed 30 new species across ten genera of Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales. The novel species described in this paper include Hydnellum carnosum, Hyd. hydrangeoides, Hyd. infundibuliforme, Hyd. liantaishanense, Hyd. porphyreum, Hyd. testaceum, Hyd. tomentosum, Hymenochaete baishanzuensis, Lyomyces membranaceus, Neosarcodon atroviolaceus, N. bambusicola, Odontia kunmingensis, Peniophorella alba, Phellodon albospinus, Ph. zonatus, Sarcodon squamulosus, Thelephora angusta, T. bomiensis, T. cacao, T. chayuensis, T. fasciculata, T. latihypha, T. linzhiensis, T. longicystidiata, T. microcarpa, T. nanyigouensis, T. nigromarginata, T. scopiformis, Xylodon albus, and X. bicystidiatus. Descriptions and illustrations of these newly proposed species are provided, along with notes discussing their distinguishing characters and those of their allied taxa in this paper. Additionally, the delimitation and diversity of these taxa in terms of morphology, ecology, and phylogeny are explored. Three keys to the species of Hydnellum, resupinate and upright Thelephora from China are provided.

    • Corticioid and hydnoid fungi represent important groups of wood-inhabiting fungi belonging to Basidiomycota[1]. The basidiomata of corticioid fungi are thin, crust-like, or membranaceous in appearance, soft, leathery, or hard in texture, and variable in color. This group of fungi typically grows on wood or soil, and is widely distributed in forest ecosystems from tropical to temperate regions worldwide. Most corticioid species are classified into the orders Agaricales, Atheliales, Auriculariales, Cantharellales, Corticiales, Gloeophyllales, Hymenochaetales, Polyporales, Russulales, Thelephorales, and Trechisporales[27]. The morphological characteristics of hydnoid fungi are highly diverse, ranging from resupinate, pileate to stipitate. However, they share a common morphological feature: their basidiomata possess odontioid to tooth-like spines[1], which facilitates spore release. Most hydnoid fungi are found in the orders Auriculariales, Cantharellales, Hymenochaetales, Polyporales, Russulales, and Thelephorales[1,79].

      Thelephorales was established by Oberwinkler in 1976 and, for a long time, consisted of two families: Thelephoraceae and Bankeraceae[1013]. Thelephoraceae was introduced by Chevallier in 1826 in the context of the regional flora of Paris, with the type genus Thelephora[14]. It was defined as encompassing fungi that possess resupinate, effuse-reflexed, or coralloid basidiomata, hyaline to coloured basidiospores with warts or echinuli[8]. Donk[10] originally separated Bankeraceae from Thelephoraceae based on spore ornamentation and distinctive odour. Species of Bankeraceae are characterized by stipitate, hydnoid or poroid basidiomata, as well as hyaline to brown basidiospores with warts[15,16]. Furthermore, certain species within Thelephorales exhibit considerable macroscopic polymorphism, which is strongly influenced by environmental factors, or results from typically growing around obstacles, resulting in highly variable and irregular shapes[16]. Therefore, relying solely on morphological characteristics is far from sufficient for distinguishing and identifying species of Thelephorales. Based on multi-gene phylogenetic analyses, Song et al. proposed that Thelephorales is divided into six clades at the family level: Bankeraceae, Lenzitopsidaceae, Polyozellaceae, Sarcodonaceae, Thelephoraceae, and Tomentellopsidaceae[13]. These families include 11 genera: Amaurodon, Boletopsis, Hydnellum, Lenzitopsis, Neosarcodon, Odontia, Phellodon, Polyozellus, Sarcodon, Thelephora, and Tomentellopsis[13]. Additionally, Corneroporus was excluded from the phylogenetic analyses due to the lack of available sequence data[13]. However, based on its segregation from Boletopsis[17], it was retained as a distinct genus within Sarcodonaceae[13]. Notably, Jülich[12] was the first to establish two families: Lenzitopsidaceae (type genus: Lenzitopsis), and Boletopsidaceae (type genus: Boletopsis). Subsequently, Singer et al.[18] proposed the family Sarcodontaceae, with Sarcodon designated as its type genus. Although Bankeraceae[10] predates Boletopsidaceae[12], the name Bankeraceae is currently applied to a clade comprising Phellodon and Amaurodon[13]. In accordance with the priority principle stipulated in the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (ICN), Boletopsidaceae is the only valid and correct name for the family that includes Boletopsis—a conclusion derived directly from the ICN's emphasis on taxonomic priority. The Sarcodontaceae can only be legitimately adopted if Boletopsis is explicitly excluded from the family. Correspondingly, Lenzitopsidaceae Jülich represents the correct name for this family.

      The order Hymenochaetales was established with the type family Hymenochaetaceae[19]. Species within Hymenochaetales exhibit high morphological diversity. The first comprehensive molecular study on homobasidiomycetes indicated that the Hymenochaetales proposed by Oberwinkler required a broader interpretation[20]. Since then, the taxonomic status of Hymenochaetales has been thoroughly investigated through molecular phylogenetic and morphological studies[2131]. The familial classification of Hymenochaetales has been continually emended, with a total of 14 family names successively proposed within this order[32,33]. At the generic level, Hymenochaetales comprises 84 genera, among which approximately 20 genera have no confirmed position in any family[3133]. Many families within Hymenochaetales are small in terms of species numbers, with several being monogeneric[34].

      Corticioid and hydnoid fungi belonging to Hymenochaetales and Thelephorales exhibit diverse trophic modes, including saprotrophy, parasitism, and symbiosis, and play vital ecological roles in forest ecosystems[33,3538]. The Thelephorales are globally distributed, with a particular prevalence in temperate to tropical forests. Within these habitats, they primarily function as ectomycorrhizal fungi or saprobes associated with both gymnosperms and angiosperms, typically occurring on the ground, underneath fallen trunks, and branches of woody plants[3951]. Wood-decaying fungi can decompose cellulose, hemicellulose and lignin in the plant cell walls, releasing nutrients and facilitating the recycling of elements such as carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus[5254]. Ectomycorrhizal fungal species form symbiotic associations with plants by developing ectomycorrhiza, which enables nutrient exchange[44,45,47,50]. As a result, these fungi play a crucial role in energy flow and nutrient cycling in forest ecosystems. Certain corticioid and hydnoid fungi, particularly ectomycorrhizal species, are sensitive to environmental pollution and soil nutrient status. Declines in their abundance have been observed in some European localities[5560]. Consequently, hydnoid fungi have been designated as priority conservation targets in numerous countries, with several species now listed on national Red Lists[6163].

      In Southwest China, species within Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales, such as Hydnellum, Inonotus, Phellinus, Sarcodon, and Thelephora, hold significant economic value due to their edibility and medicinal properties[64,65]. Market statistics indicate that thousands of tons of Sarcodon spp. and Hydnellum spp. are sold in the free markets in Sichuan Province (China) each year[64]. With the deepening understanding of hydnoid fungi, the research on the medicinal value and active substances of certain species has gradually attracted more attention[6675]. Some species of Thelephorales not only have edible value but also possess important medicinal functions, including cholesterol-lowering, antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, antitumor and immune enhancement, etc.[76,77]. Certain species within Hymenochaetales also exhibit medicinal properties[7884].

      Southern China presents a geographically intriguing area for research, as it encompasses several regions with distinct geologic histories, and biogeographically belongs to tropical and subtropical zones. This region features a pronounced topographical gradient, descending from elevated western terrains to lower eastern landscapes. The western part is dominated by plateaus and basins, while the eastern part consists predominantly of plains, low mountains, and hills, resulting in an overall topography with a distinct stepped distribution. Notably, the southern region of the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau is geographically located in southern China, and its significant altitudinal variations contribute to an exceptionally diverse range of climatic types[85,86]. China's tropical and subtropical forests harbor unique and rich biodiversity while providing vital ecosystem services[87]. The Qinghai-Xizang Plateau exerts a dual influence on East Asian climate systems: it obstructs westerly atmospheric circulation and amplifies monsoon intensity, which has facilitated the development of characteristic subtropical rainforest ecosystems across extensive areas south of the Qinling Mountains-Huaihe River line in China's subtropical zone. Additionally, this region encompasses a biodiversity hotspot (i.e., the mountains of southwest China), and one of the three major karst regions globally[87,88]. The abundant vegetation and diverse geographical environment create favorable conditions for the growth of corticioid and hydnoid fungi. In recent years, several studies have been conducted on corticioid and hydnoid fungi in subtropical and southern temperate forests in China, leading to the publication of numerous species[35,36,38,64,89101]. However, the taxonomic and phylogenetic relationships among taxa of corticioid and hydnoid fungi remain insufficiently understood.

      During the investigation of corticioid and hydnoid fungal specimens from the subtropical to temperate plateau region of China, a significant number of valuable specimens were collected. In this study, these specimens were analyzed using macro-morphology, microscopic examinations, ultrastructural analyses, and multi-gene molecular phylogenetic analysis (including ITS, nLSU, nSSU, and mtSSU). Based on these analyses, 30 new species are proposed, belonging to the genera Hydnellum, Hymenochaete, Lyomyces, Neosarcodon, Odontia, Peniphorella, Phellodon, Sarcodon, Thelephora, and Xylodon. Three keys to the species of Hydnellum, resupinate and upright Thelephora from China were provided.

    • Fresh basidiomata of the corticioid and hydnoid fungi were collected from Chongqing Municipality, Fujian Province, Guangdong Province, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guizhou Province, Hunan Province, Sichuan Province, Xizang Autonomous Region, Yunnan Province, and Zhejiang Province in China (Fig. 1). The specimens were photographed in situ, and detailed macroscopic characteristics of the fresh samples were recorded. They were then dried using an electric food dehydrator at 40 °C, sealed in envelope bags and deposited in the Herbarium of the Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (IFP).

      Figure 1. 

      The collection localities of all specimens in this study. Map source: Standard map approved by the Ministry of Natural Resources of China, Approval No. GS(2024)0650.

    • Macroscopic descriptions of collected specimens were based on fresh basidiomata. Microscopic procedures followed the method described by Yuan et al.[102]. Dried material was mounted in 5% aqueous KOH, and Melzers reagent to test for any amyloid and/or dextrinoid reactions (Melzer's reagent: 1.5 g KI [potassium iodide], 0.5 g I [crystalline iodine], 22 g chloral hydrate, distilled water 20 mL). The following abbreviations are used in the text: KOH = 5% potassium hydroxide; L = mean spore length (arithmetic average of all spores); W = mean spore width (arithmetic average of all spores); Q = variation in the ratios of L/W between specimens studied, and n = total number of spores measured from a given number of specimens. Sections were examined at magnifications up to × 1,000 using a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope (Tokyo, Japan) with phase-contrast illumination, and dimensions were estimated with an accuracy of 0.1 μm. Microscopic drawings were prepared with the aid of a drawing tube. Spore measurements excluded the apiculus, and 5% of the measurements at each end of the range are given in parentheses. The spore measurements were made with a Nikon SMZ 645 compound microscope. Colour codes refer to Kornerup & Wanscher[103].

    • Phire Plant Direct PCR Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) procedures were used to extract total genomic DNA from the basidiomata. Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed on a Bio-Rad T100TM Thermal Cycler (Bio–RAD Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The internal transcribed spacer region (ITS) was amplified with primer pairs ITS1 and ITS4[104]; for the large subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (nLSU), LROR and LR7 were used[105]. The small subunit of nuclear ribosomal RNA gene (nSSU) was amplified with primer pairs NS1 and NS4[104]. The mitochondrial SSU (mtSSU) region was amplified with primer pairs MS1 and MS2[104].

      The final PCR volume was 25 μl; each tube contained 1 μl each primer, 1 μl extracted DNA, 10 μl ddH2O, and 12.5 μl T5 Super PCR Mix (containing Taq polymerase, dNTP and Mg2+, Beijing Tisingke Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). The PCR procedure for ITS was: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 s, annealing at 54 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR procedure for nLSU was: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 30 s, annealing at 50 °C for 1 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR procedure for nSSU was: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 34 cycles of denaturation at 94 °C for 40 s, annealing at 55 °C for 45 s, and extension at 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR procedure for and mtSSU was an initial denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min, followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, annealing at 55 °C for 2 min, and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension at 72 °C for 10 min. All amplified PCR products were estimated visually with 1.4% agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide and sequenced at the Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) with the same primers. All new sequences generated in this study were submitted to GenBank. Duplicate PCR and sequencing were performed for all new species described from a single specimen, which effectively negated the possibility of sequencing errors.

    • Sequences for phylogenetic analysis were obtained from GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank) using the BLAST option and downloaded (Supplementary Table S1). The sequences were aligned with MAFFT v.7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/index.html), after which the alignments were manually corrected using MEGA v. 7.0[106,107]. The dataset was initially aligned and later, ITS, nLSU, nSSU, and mtSSU sequences were combined using using BioEdit v. 7.0.9[108].

      Phylogenetic analyses for each dataset were conducted using Bayesian Inference (BI) analysis and Maximum Likelihood (ML) methods. All characters were weighted, and gaps were treated as missing data. BI analysis with MrBayes v. 3.2.7[109] implemented the Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) technique. Four simultaneous Markov chains were run with 15, 10, 5, 5 million generations for the four datasets respectively, starting from random trees and keeping one tree every 100th generation until the average standard deviation of split frequencies was below 0.01. The value of burn-in was set to discard 25% of trees when calculating the posterior probabilities. Bayesian Posterior Probabilities (BPP) were obtained from the 50% majority rule consensus of the trees kept. An ML analysis used the same datasets as the BI analysis, and was performed in RAxML v. 8.2.4[110]. The best tree was obtained by performing 1,000 rapid bootstrap inferences, followed by a thorough search for the most likely tree[111]. Phylogenetic trees were visualised with FigTree v. 1.4.2 (http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree, accessed on 20 April, 2025), and additional layout was carried out using Adobe Illustrator CS v. 5.

    • Thelephorales Corner ex Oberw.

      Bankeraceae Donk

      Phellodon phylogeny based on combined ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequence data (Fig. 2)

      The aligned dataset comprised 79 specimens, representing 42 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for the combined ITS + nLSU + nSSU (Fig. 2) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 3,545 characters, of which 2,872 characters are constant, 105 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 568 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the four genes; the models for ITS, nLSU, and nSSU were GTR + I + G, with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.004752. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 2. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Phellodon and related genera in Thelephorales based on ITS + nLSU + nSSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Boletopsidaceae Bondartsev & Singer ex Jülich

      Hydnellum phylogeny based on combined ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequence data (Fig. 3)

      The aligned dataset comprised 187 specimens, representing 86 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for combined ITS + nLSU + nSSU (Fig. 3) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 3,715 characters, of which 2,520 characters are constant, 167 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 1,028 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the four genes; the models for ITS, nLSU, and nSSU were GTR + I + G, with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.038592. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 3. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Hydnellum, and related genera in Thelephorales based on ITS + nLSU + nSSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Neosarcodon and Sarcodon phylogeny based on combined ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequence data (Fig. 4)

      The aligned dataset comprised 86 specimens, representing 55 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for combined ITS + nLSU + nSSU (Fig. 4) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 3,379 characters, of which 2,349 characters are constant, 220 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 810 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the four genes; the models for ITS, nLSU and nSSU were GTR + I + G, with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.006577. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 4. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Neosarcodon, Sarcodon, and related genera in Thelephorales based on ITS + nLSU + nSSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Thelephoraceae Chevall.

      Odontia phylogeny based on combined ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequence data (Fig. 5)

      The aligned dataset comprised 38 specimens, representing 28 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for combined ITS + nLSU + nSSU (Fig. 5) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 3,306 characters, of which 2,515 characters are constant, 223 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 568 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the three genes; the models for ITS, nLSU, and nSSU were GTR + I + G with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.003309. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 5. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Odontia, and related genera in Thelephorales based on ITS + nLSU + nSSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Thelephora phylogeny based on combined ITS, nLSU, nSSU, and mtSSU sequence data (Fig. 6)

      The aligned dataset comprised 248 specimens, representing 193 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for combined ITS + nLSU + nSSU + mtSSU (Fig. 6) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 4,595 characters, of which 2,698 characters are constant, 659 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 1,238 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the four genes; the models for ITS, nLSU, nSSU, and mtSSU were GTR + I + G, with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.031686. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 6. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Thelephora, and related genera in Thelephorales based on ITS + nLSU + nSSU + mtSSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Hymenochaetales Oberw.

      Hymenochaetaceae Donk

      Hymenochaete phylogeny based on combined ITS and nLSU sequence data (Fig. 7)

      The aligned dataset comprised 123 specimens representing 105 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for combined ITS + nLSU (Fig. 7) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 2,713 characters, of which 1,602 characters are constant, 276 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 835 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the four genes; the models for ITS and nLSU were GTR + I + G, with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.044018. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 7. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Hymenochaete, and related genera in Hymenochaetales based on ITS + nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Peniophorellaceae L.W. Zhou, X.Wei Wang & S.L. Liu

      Schizoporaceae Jülich

      Peniophorella - Xylodon phylogeny based on combined ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequence data (Fig. 8)

      The aligned dataset comprised 150 specimens representing 150 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for combined ITS + nLSU + nSSU (Fig. 8) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 3,743 characters, of which 2,172 characters are constant, 436 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 1,135 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the four genes; the models for ITS, nLSU, and nSSU were GTR + I + G, with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.023398. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 8. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Peniophorella, Xylodon, and related genera in Hymenochaetales based on ITS + nLSU + nSSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Schizoporaceae Jülich

      Lyomyces phylogeny based on combined ITS and nLSU sequence data (Fig. 9)

      The aligned dataset comprised 70 specimens, representing 48 species. Four Markov chains were run for two runs from random starting trees, each for one million generations for combined ITS + nLSU (Fig. 9) data set with trees and parameters sampled every 1,000 generations. The dataset had an aligned length of 2,159 characters, of which 1,371 characters are constant, 220 are variable and parsimony uninformative, and 568 are parsimony informative. The best-fit evolutionary models applied in Bayesian analyses were selected by MrModeltest v. 2.3 for each region of the four genes; the models for ITS and nLSU were GTR + I + G, with equal frequency of nucleotides. Bayesian analysis resulted in a topology similar to that from ML analysis, with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.007485. The ML topology was presented and annotated with ML bootstraps ≥ 50%, and BI bootstraps ≥ 0.95.

      Figure 9. 

      Maximum likelihood tree illustrating the phylogeny of Lyomyces, and related genera in Hymenochaetales based on ITS + nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values higher than 50%, and Bayesian posterior probabilities more than 0.95 respectively. Specimens examined are in bold, and new species are marked with red stars.

      Taxonomy:

      Thelephorales Corner ex Oberw.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 90575

      Bankeraceae Donk

      Index Fungorum number: IF 80513

      Type genus – Phellodon P. Karst.

      Phellodon P. Karst.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 18247

      Type species – Phellodon niger (Fr.) P. Karst.

      Notes – Phellodon was established by Petter Adolf Karsten in 1881 to distinguish it from other hydnoid genera with fleshy basidiomata, such as Hydnum and Sarcodon. The generic name is derived from the 'phellos' (cork), and 'odous' (tooth), referring to the cork-like texture of the pileus and hydnoid hymenophoral surface. The genus originally comprised three species, namely Ph. niger, Ph. cyathiformis and Ph. melaleucus. Phellodon niger, originally described by Fries as Hydnum nigrum[112], was later designated as the type species by Banker[113]. Subsequently, Maas Geesteranus[114] recognized only four Phellodon species in Europe, namely Ph. confluens, Ph. melaleucus, Ph. niger, and Ph. tomentosus. Later, Niemelä et al.[115] described a new species from pine forests in Finland. Recent molecular taxonomic studies on Phellodon have focused primarily on China, Europe, and the USA. In these investigations, 11 distinct taxa were identified in the southeastern USA[13,116], 13 in Europe[117], and 17 new species were documented from China[13,9193,118]. In the present study, two new species of Phellodon from China are described, based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses inferred from ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequences (Fig. 2).

      Phellodon albospinus Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 10 and 11

      Fungal Names number: FN 573093

      Figure 10. 

      Basidiomata of Phellodon albospinus (holotype IFP 020036).

      Figure 11. 

      Microscopic structures of Phellodon albospinus (drawn from the holotype IFP 020036). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Phellodon albospinus is characterized by the white spines when fresh, white to dark brown pileal surface, generative hyphae with long-cell and colorless to pale yellow basidiospores.

      Etymology – Albospinus (Lat.): referring to the white spines.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Lufeng City, Gaofeng Township, Beidala Village, GPS coordinates 25°20′4″ N, 101°52′57″ E, altitude 1,950 m, ground in mixed forest, 9 September, 2024, Yuan 21186 (IFP 020036, GenBank ITS: PQ803282; LSU: PV257916).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, solitary, soft and leathery when fresh, becoming woody and light in weight upon drying; taste mild, mild odor when dry. Pileus applanate to flabelliform, smooth, to 30 mm diam and 2–6 mm thick at center. Pileal surface white (–A1), light orange (5A4) to dark brown (8F8), zonate, glabrous when fresh, becoming glabrous, rugose when dry; margin white (–A1) when fresh, brownish orange (6C4) when dry, even to wavy, sometimes lobed. Spine surface white (–A1) when fresh, light brown (6D6) to black when dry; spines up to 2 mm long, base up to 0.2 mm diam, conical, 3–5 per mm, strongly decurrent on stipe, without spines at pileus margin, brittle when dry. Stipe lateral, 25–29 mm long, and 4–7 mm diam., leathery when fresh, woody upon drying, light brown (6D6) to dark brown (8F8), solid inner, cylindrical to flat, or attenuate downwards with a bulbous base.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, thin to thick-walled, CB+ in thick-walled hyphae, IKI–, tissues turned light yellow-green to olive green in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae with simple-septa, slightly thick-walled, colorless, rarely branched, uninflated, long-cell, parallel, 3–4.5 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae with simple-septa, thin-walled, colorless, unbranched, uninflated, interwoven in subsurface layer to parallel below, long-cell, straight, 2–3 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae with simple-septa, slightly thick to thick walled, colorless, unbranched, occasionally inflated, long-cell, straight, 2–5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, with four sterigmata, and a basal simple-septa, 15‒43 × 3‒5 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subglobose or apple-like, colorless to pale yellow, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, less than 1.0 μm long, (3.8‒)4‒5.1(–5.9) × (3.3–)3.5‒4.5(–4.9) μm, L = 4.36 μm, W = 4.08 μm, Q = 1–1.22 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – The new species Phellodon albospinus is classified within Phellodon (Fig. 2), and forms a clade with Ph. crassipileatus and Ph. zonatus. Ph. albospinus resembles Ph. crassipileatus in sharing the dark brown pileal surface and white spines when fresh. However, Ph. crassipileatus differs from Ph. albospinus due to its the special odors when dry and absent of clamp connections[92]. Ph. albospinus resembles Ph. subgriseofuscus in having white spines. However, Ph. subgriseofuscus differs from Ph. albospinus due to its fenugreek odor when dry, and wider basidia (5–7 µm)[93].

      The phylogenetic analyses based on sequence data revealed a new distribution record for this species from Laos in the UNITE database, thereby expanding its known geographic range.

      Phellodon zonatus L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 12,13

      Fungal Names number: FN 572441

      Figure 12. 

      Basidiomata of Phellodon zonatus (holotype IFP 020035).

      Figure 13. 

      Microscopic structures of Phellodon zonatus (drawn from the holotype IFP 020035). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Phellodon zonatus is characterized by the structural complexity basidiomata with a light fenugreek odor, flabellate to semicircle pileus, clavate or sinuous basidia and basidiospores measuring (3.7–)3.8‒4(–4.2) × (3‒)3.1‒3.8(–4) μm.

      Etymology – Zonatus (Lat.): referring to the zonate pileus surface.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Lincang City, Wulaoshan National Forest Park, GPS coordinates 23°54′46″ N, 100°10′51″ E, altitude 2,480 m, ground in mixed forest, 24 August, 2024, Yuan 20770 (holotype: IFP 020035, GenBank ITS: PQ803281; LSU: PV257915; SSU: PV257941).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, solitary, structural complexity may be increased further by developing secondary pilei from upper pilei surfaces, usually incorporates individual litter, releasing a light fenugreek odor when dry. Pileus flabellate to semicircle, smooth, to 80 mm broad, and 8 mm thick when dry, corky, and crisp with irregularly rounded, and undulating to distinctly lobate margins which, remain white when in active growth, around the center the texture is bumpy, moving away from the center there may be concentric corrugations and color zonation may be weak to strong, usually some shade of dark yellow (4C8) or tan (6D5–6E6) when fresh, dark gray (–F1) to dark brown (6F4–9F8) in the center, and pale brown (5D4–7D8) at the edge when dry. Spines less than 2 mm long, white (–A1) when fresh, later to yellowish white (1A2–4A2) to orange white (5A2–6A2), dark color at the basal. Stipe cylindrical or basally tapered with a smooth texture, 26–30 mm long, and 5–10 mm across, lacking a distinct woolly tomentum but can be grooved, flattened or slightly velvety in places, with decurrent rudimentary or entire spines towards the apex, reddish brown (8D4–9F8) when fresh, later to pale brown (5D4–7D8).

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, thin-walled, CB–, IKI–, tissues having a weakly greenish-grey color in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae mostly with simple-septa, rarely with clamp connections, thin-walled, colorless, unbranched, uninflated, parallel, 2–6 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae with simple-septa, thin-walled, colorless, unbranched, uninflated, interwoven in subsurface layer to parallel below, long-cell, straight, 2–4 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae with simple-septa, thin-walled, colorless, rarely branched, uninflated, long-cell, straight, 2–5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate or sinuous, with 4 sterigmata and a basal simple-septa, the apex is swollen and constricted in the middle with oil droplets, 30‒47 × 3‒6.5 μm, CB–, IKI–.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subglobose or apple-like, colorless, thin-walled, with oil-droplet inside, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, less than 1.0 μm long, (3.7–)3.8‒4(–4.2) × (3‒)3.1‒3.8(–4) μm, L = 3.91 μm, W = 3.42 μm, Q = 1–1.15 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – The new species Phellodon zonatus is classified within Phellodon (Fig. 2), and forms a clade with Ph. crassipileatus. Ph. zonatus resembles Ph. crassipileatus in sharing the special odors when dry, the color of spines. However, Ph. crassipileatus differs from Ph. zonatus due to its shorter stipe (up to 1.5 cm), the apex shape of basidia and larger basidiospores ([3.5–]4–5 × 4–5 µm)[92]. Ph. zonatus resembles Ph. perchocolatus and Ph. subgriseofuscus in having white spines. However, Ph. perchocolatus differs from Ph. zonatus due to its larger basidiospores (4–5[–5.5] × [3.5–]4–4.5[–5] μm), and its longer size of spines (up to 3 mm)[92]. Ph. subgriseofuscus distinguish from Ph. zonatus in its longer basidiospores (4–5 × [3–]3.2–4.8 μm), and black pileal surface[93].

      Two closely related sequences from Laos were retrieved from the UNITE database. Phylogenetic analyses demonstrated that these sequences cluster within the same clade as the specimens described in this study, thereby extending the distribution range of Phellodon zonatus to Laos.

      Boletopsidaceae Bondartsev & Singer ex Jülich

      Index Fungorum number: IF 81724

      Type genus – Boletopsis Fayod

      Hydnellum P. Karst.

      Index Fungorum number: IF17781

      Type species – Hydnellum suaveolens (Scop.) P. Karst.

      Notes – The early stipitate hydnoid fungi were initially placed in the genus Hydnum by Fries[119]. Karsten[120] established the genus Hydnellum, typified by Hydnellum suaveolens, and distinguished it from the Hydnum based on the texture of the basidiomata, the morphological characteristics of stipes and spines. Subsequently, the stipitate hydnoid species have continued to attract considerable systematic research[114,121124]. Donk[10] proposed the family Bankeraceae, including Bankera and Phellodon, while placing Boletopsis, Hydnellum and Sarcodon in the Thelephoraceae. Jülich[12] broadened the concept of Bankeraceae to encompass stipitate and hydnoid basidiomata, and redefined the family based on spore color and morphology, placing Hydnellum and Sarcodon together in the Bankeraceae. With the advent of molecular systematics, studies have shown that Hydnellum and Sarcodon are closely related phylogenetically, and neither genus forms a strictly monophyletic group[25,125,126]. Larsson et al.[127] redefined the generic boundaries between Hydnellum and Sarcodon based on molecular evidence. Subsequently, numerous multi-gene phylogenetic studies and new species descriptions have been published, further enhancing the species diversity of Hydnellum[36,64,94]. Currently, approximately 80 species have been described and assigned to the genus Hydnellum according to records in Index Fungorum. In the present study, seven new species—Hyd. carnosum, Hyd. hydrangeoides, Hyd. infundibuliforme, Hyd. liantaishanense, Hyd. porphyreum, Hyd. testaceum and Hyd. tomentosum—are described based on the ITS, nLSU, and nSSU data (Fig. 3).

      Hydnellum carnosum L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 14,15

      Fungal Names number: FN 572433

      Figure 14. 

      Basidiomata of Hydnellum carnosum (holotype IFP 020026). Photo by Xue-Lian Gao.

      Figure 15. 

      Microscopic structures of Hydnellum carnosum (drawn from the holotype IFP 020026). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Hydnellum carnosum is characterized by the deep orange to brown basidiomata, basidiomata with a bitter taste, stipe completely covered with spines and ellipsoid to subglobose basidiospores.

      Etymology – Carnosum (Lat.): referring to the carnose basidiomata.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Chuxiong Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Lufeng City, Guangtong Town, Shanjianshan, GPS coordinates 25°14′24″ N, 101°45′52″ E, altitude 2,300 m, ground in mixed forest, 31 August, 2023, GXL 0391 (holotype: IFP 020026, GenBank ITS: PQ349955; LSU: PV257895; SSU: PV257935).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, gregarious, soft and fleshy when fresh, becoming firm, brittle, and light in weight upon dry, taste bitter, odour farinaceous when dry. Pileus subcircular, bumpy and uneven, pubescent, upwarp scales, incurved margins, moving away from the center radiating projecting fibrils, involuted, and rarely lobed, deep orange (5A8–6A8) to brown (6D4–7F8) when fresh, light-brown (5D4–7D8) to brown (6D4–7F8) when dry. Spines conical, tenuous, less than 2 mm long, decurrent on stipe, and nearly to the ground, spines at pileus margin, white (–A1) when fresh, beige (4C3) at the apex and brown (6D4–7F8) at the basal when dry, brittle. Stipe central, clavate to cylindrical, completely covered with spines, reddish brown (16A4–19A5) when fresh, dark yellow (4C8) to light-brown (5D4–7D8) when dry, sunken, rugous.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with simple-septa, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues olivaceous in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, sparsely branched, uninflated, partly shrinking at the septate, unequal septate, interwoven, 3–15 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin-walled, infrequent branched, more or less parallel along spines, long-cell, straight, 2–3 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, frequent branched, inflated, long-cell, more or less flexural, 2–5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, 4 sterigmata and up to 5 μm, with simple-septa or branch at base, 27–58 × 5–7 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid to subglobose, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, up to 1.0 μm long, (3.5–)3.7–4 × 3–3(–3.5) μm, L = 3.97 μm, W = 3.81 μm, Q = 1–1.14 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – The new species Hydnellum carnosum is classified within Hydnellum (Fig. 3), and forms a clade within subg. Scabrosum[36]. This subgenus is characterized planar to depressed and brown pileus, azonate pileal surface with scabrosity, variously brown spines, not duplex and yellow to orange context, inflated and unclamped generative hyphae, and irregularly ellipsoid to globose basidiospores[36]. Similarly, Hyd. carnosum has bumpy and uneven pileus with tomentum, unclamped generative hyphae, and ellipsoid basidiospres. However, Hyd. carnosum has deeper color of context (brown). Hyd. carnosum resembles Hyd. fagiscabrosum in having fleshy basidiomata, stipe covered with spines, and pileus with scales. However, Hyd. fagiscabrosum differs from Hyd. carnosum due to its brown basidiospores, white pileus margins, and longer stipe[128].

      Hydnellum hydrangeoides L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 16,17

      Fungal Names number: FN 572435

      Figure 16. 

      Basidiomata of Hydnellum hydrangeoides (holotype IFP 020029).

      Figure 17. 

      Microscopic structures of Hydnellum hydrangeoides (drawn from the holotype IFP 020029). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Hydnellum hydrangeoides is characterized by the broccoli-like basidiomata with a typical smell of dry mushrooms, tomentose pileal surfaces, isolated or multiplex spines, and basidiospores with oily-like contents.

      Etymology – Hydrangeoides (Lat.): referring to basidiomata similar to the hydrangea.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Luquan Yi, and Miao Autonomous County, Tuanjie Town, GPS coordinates 25°45′43″ N, 102°31′54″ E, altitude 1,800 m, ground in mixed forest, 11 October, 2023, Yuan 19215 (holotype: IFP 020029, GenBank ITS: PQ805351; LSU: PV257890; SSU: PV257929).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, solitary, fleshy, broccoli-like, becoming hard and brittle upon dry, taste mild, releasing a typical smell of dry mushrooms (odor fragrant). Pileus hemispherical, from many repeated small pilei, up to 6 cm tall, individuals more than 5 mm thick, often incurved margins, irregularly flabelliform, hard, brittle, and tenacious, usually uneven and bumpy, surface with tomentose, greyish orange (5B3–6B6) to brownish orange (6C3–7C8) when fresh, olive brown (4D3–4F8) to purplish grey (13B2–14F2) when dry. Spines conical, more than 2 mm long, isolated or multiplex, usually differentiated into 2–3, without decurrent on stipe, violet grey (15B2–18F2) when fresh, surface light violet (16A4–19A5) and inner deep violet (15D8–18E8) when dry, brittle. Stipe clavate, 70 × 30 mm, middle, smooth, uneven and bumpy, unincorporates litter, white (–A1) when fresh, pale violet (15A3–19A3) when dry, hard.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues olivaceous in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae mostly with simple-septa, rarely with clamp connections, slightly thick-walled, smooth, frequent branched, irregularly arranged, flexuous, rarely inflated, and up to 9 μm wide, 2–6 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, frequent branched, parallel along spines, uninflated, long cell, unequal septate, 2–5 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae mostly with simple-septa, rarely with clamp connections, thick-walled, smooth to adhesion crystals, frequent branched, flexuous, irregularly arranged, inflated, and up to 10 μm wide, long-cell, unequal septate, flexuous, 2–6 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, with 4 sterigmata and a basal clamp connection, 26‒59 × 3‒5 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subglobose to globose, with oily-like contents, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, less than 1.0 μm long, (2.8–)2.9–4.0 × 2.5‒3.0 μm, L = 3.1 μm, W = 3.0 μm, Q = 1–1.33 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – In the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3), the new species Hydnellum hydrangeoides is revealed as a sister to Hyd. scleropodium and Hyd. cyanopodium. They exhibit some similar characteristics: spines length (2–2.5 mm long), and tuberculate basidiospores[122]. However, Hyd. hydrangeoides can be distinguished from Hyd. scleropodium by its narrower basidia and shorter spines[122]. Hyd. hydrangeoides differs from Hyd. cyanopodium due to its tomentose pileus surface, and smaller stipe[122]. Hyd. hydrangeoides resembles Hyd. bomiense and Hyd. yunnanense in having a tomentose pileal surface. However, Hyd. bomiense differs from Hyd. hydrangeoides due to its grayish yellow to dark brown pileus, shorter spines (< 1.1 mm), and basidia (15–42 × 4–7 µm)[36]. Hyd. yunnanense distinguish from Hyd. hydrangeoides by its shorter stipe (< 4 cm), and basidia (13–28 × 4–7 µm)[36].

      Hydnellum infundibuliforme L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 18,19

      Fungal Names number: FN 572431

      Figure 18. 

      Basidiomata of Hydnellum infundibuliforme (holotype IFP 020021).

      Figure 19. 

      Microscopic structures of Hydnellum infundibuliforme (drawn from the holotype IFP 020021). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Hydnellum infundibuliforme is characterized by the odorless basidiomata with a woody taste, uneven and bumpy pileal surfaces, tomentose stipe surfaces and ellipsoid to subglobose basidiospores.

      Etymology – Infundibuliforme (Lat.): referring to the infundibuliform pileus.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Lufeng City, Gaofeng Township, Beidala Village, GPS coordinates 25°20′4″ N, 101°52′57″ E, altitude 1,950 m, ground in mixed forest, 9 September, 2024, Yuan 21180 (holotype: IFP 020021, GenBank ITS: PQ805356).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, gregarious, fleshy when fresh, becoming hard and brittle upon drying, taste mild like woody, not releasing a smell. Pileus irregularly flabelliform to subcircular or splintered, 20–35 mm long, and 15–30 mm across, occasionally adheres to forming complexes, often incurved margins, corky, stiff, and brittle, usually uneven and bumpy, concentrically zonate, invagination at the center, moving away from the center radiating tufts and projecting fibrils and the color becoming lighter, beige at the growth active areas, reddish brown (8D4–9F8) to dark brown (6F4–9F8) when fresh, light brown (5D4–7D8) when dry, and light yellow (1A4–4A5) crystals precipitated. Spines conical, tenuous, solitary, up to 3 mm long, decurrent on stipe, light brown (5D4–7D8) when fresh, brown (6D4–7F8) when dry, brittle. Stipe clavate, 22–57 mm long, and 3–7 mm across, middle, surface with tomentose, rarely producing branched, occasionally incorporates litter, inner corky, reddish brown (8D4–9F8) to dark brown (6F4–9F8) when fresh, resilient, reddish brown (8D4–9F8) when dry, brittle.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with simple-septa, smooth, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues indigoticus in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, sparsely branched, parallel, regularly arranged, uninflated, occasionally flexuous, 2–5 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick-walled, infrequent branched, parallel along spines, uninflated, long-cell, straight, 1.5–4 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, sparsely branched, uninflated, long-cell, straight, unequal septate, occasionally flexuous,1.5–3.5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, four sterigmata, constricted at the base, with oily-like contents, occasionally, 23‒41 × 3‒5 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid to subglobose, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, less than 1.0 μm long, 3.0–4.0(‒4.2) × (2.5‒)2.9‒3.3(‒3.5) μm, L = 3.4 μm, W = 3.0 μm, Q = 1–1.33 (n = 60/2), CB–, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratypes) – China, Yunnan Province, Lufeng City, Gaofeng Township, Beidala Village, GPS coordinates 25°20′4″ N, 101°52′57″ E, altitude 1,950 m, ground in mixed forest, 9 September, 2024, Yuan 21185 (IFP 020022, GenBank ITS: PQ805357; SSU: PV257933); ground in mixed forest, 9 September, 2024, Yuan 21220 (IFP 020023, GenBank ITS: PQ805358; SSU: PV257934).

      Notes – The new species Hydnellum infundibuliforme is grouped within Hydnellum, forming a monophyletic lineage, and is closely associated with Hyd. cumulatum (Fig. 3). Hyd. infundibuliforme resembles Hyd. cumulatum in sharing the similar size of spine (3 mm). However, Hyd. cumulatum differs from Hyd. infundibuliforme due to larger pileus (7 cm broad), wider basidia (24.0–32.5 × 5.0–5.8[–6.4] µm), and larger basidiospores ([3.7–]4.0–5.0× 3.5–4.5 µm)[122]. Hyd. infundibuliforme resembles Hyd. auratile, Hyd. brunneorubrum and Hyd. rubidofuscum in having reddish brown pileus. However, Hyd. auratile differs from Hyd. infundibuliforme due to deeply split margin, and tawny to purplish brown spines[124]. Hyd. brunneorubrum differs from Hyd. infundibuliforme by its longer spines (up to 4 mm), wider stipes (up to 10 mm), and larger basidiospores ([4–]4.1–5.1[–5.2] × [3.1–]3.2–4.6[–4.8] µm)[36]. Hyd. rubidofuscum differs from Hyd. infundibuliforme by its larger pileus (up to 70 mm), scrupose, fibrillose to virgate pileal surface. and grayish brown spines[36].

      Hydnellum liantaishanense L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 20,21

      Fungal Names number: FN 572432

      Figure 20. 

      Basidiomata of Hydnellum liantaishanense (holotype IFP 020024).

      Figure 21. 

      Microscopic structures of Hydnellum liantaishanense (drawn from the holotype IFP 020024). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Hydnellum liantaishanense is characterized by the unclosed round to circular pileus with upwarp scales, uneven and bumpy pileal surfaces, spines growing near the soil, and clavate or sinuous basidia.

      Etymology – Liantaishanense (Lat.): referring to the type from Liantaishan Mountain.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Dali City, Shuanglang Town, Liantai Mountain, GPS coordinates 25°56′50″ N, 100°17′38″ E, altitude 2,988 m, ground in mixed forest, 7 September, 2024, Yuan 21089 (holotype: IFP 020024, GenBank ITS: PQ805355; LSU: PV257894).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, solitary, fleshy when fresh, becoming hard and brittle upon drying, taste mild, not releasing a smell. Pileus unclosed round to circular, irregularly, up to 60 mm, often incurved margins, moving away from the center there are radiating tufts and projecting fibrils, hard and brittle, usually uneven and bumpy, concentrically zonate, reddish brown (8D4–9F8) to dark brown (6F4–9F8) when fresh, light brown (5D4–7D8) when dry, rugose, with upwarp scales, and not easily dislodged. Spines conical, solitary, less than 3 mm long, decurrent on stipe, surface dark violet (14F3–14F8) when fresh, brown (6D4–7F8) when dry, brittle. Stipe cylindrical to clavate, 25–70 mm long, and 6–10 mm across, middle, smooth, fleshy when fresh, brittle when dry, some of the spines grow near the soil, reddish white (7A2–13A2) to orange red (8A6–8B8).

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with simple-septa, thin- to slightly thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues olivaceous in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae colorless, sparsely branched, regularly arranged, inflated, sometimes flexuous, 3–10 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin-walled, colorless, sparsely branched, parallel along spines, uninflated, straight, 2–4 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae colorless, sparsely branched, uninflated, long-cell, straight, 2–8.5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate or sinuous, thin-walled, smooth, 4 sterigmata, constricted at the base, with oily-like contents, occasionally, 22‒35 × 3‒5 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subglobose to globose, apple-like, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, less than 1.0 μm long, (3.7‒)3.8–4.1(‒4.5) × (2.9‒)3‒3.4(‒3.7) μm, L = 4.0 μm, W = 3.0 μm, Q = 1.21–1.33 (n = 60/2), CB–, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Yunnan Province, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Dali City, Shuanglang Town, Liantai Mountain, GPS coordinates 25°56′50″ N, 100°17′38″ E, altitude 2,988 m, ground in mixed forest, 7 September, 2024, Yuan 21027 (IFP 020025, GenBank ITS: PQ805354; LSU: PV257893; SSU: PV257932).

      Notes – In this study, the new species Hydnellum liantaishanense is placed within Hydnellum (Fig. 3), and it forms a clade with Hyd. fuscoindicum and Hyd. porphyreum. Hyd. liantaishanense resembles Hyd. porphyreum in having clavate stipe and simple-septate hyphal system. However, Hyd. liantaishanense can be delimited from Hyd. porphyreum by its narrower basidia and shorter basidiospores. Hyd. liantaishanense resembles Hyd. atrospinosum and Hyd. squamulosum in having circular pileus. Hyd. atrospinosum differs from Hyd. liantaishanense in its larger pileus (up to 75 mm), shorter spines (< 2.5 mm), and basidia (17–45 µm)[36]. Hyd. squamulosum distinguish from Hyd. liantaishanense by its smaller pileus (< 35 mm), shorter spines (< 2 mm), and stipes (< 4 cm)[36].

      Hydnellum porphyreum L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 22,23

      Fungal Names number: FN 572434

      Figure 22. 

      Basidiomata of Hydnellum porphyreum (holotype IFP 020027). Photo by Yan-Yan He.

      Figure 23. 

      Microscopic structures of Hydnellum porphyreum (drawn from the holotype IFP 020027). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Hydnellum porphyreum is characterized by the purplish-pink to light-violet pileus, stipe with decurrent spines, curved and fleshy stipes and ellipsoid to ovoid basidiospores.

      Etymology – Porphyreum (Lat.): referring to the purple basidiomata.

      Type – China, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin City, Xing'an County, Gaoshang Town, GPS coordinates 25°24′58″ N, 110°35′30″ E, altitude 1,100 m, ground in mixed forest, 3 April, 2024, Yuan 19292 (holotype: IFP 020027, GenBank ITS: PQ805352; LSU: PV257891; SSU: PV257930).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, solitary to gregarious, soft and fleshy when fresh, becoming firm and light in weight upon dry, taste none, odour farinaceous when dry. Pileus planar, round, up to 21 mm across and 4–7 mm thick at the centre, incurved, rarely lobed, surface azonate, pubescent, floccose to felted, purplish-pink (14A5) to light-violet (15A5–19A5) when fresh, later to light-brown (5D4–7D8) when dry, margin light-yellow (1A4–4A5) to greyish violet (17D5) when fresh, dark violet (15F3–18F8) with age. Spines conical, up to 2.6 mm long, base up to 0.4 mm diam., 3–4 per mm, decurrent on stipe, without spines at pileus margin, brittle when dry, surface white (–A1) to pale violet (15A3–19A3) when fresh, brown (6E5–7F8) when dry. Stipe central, clavate, curved, fleshy, 1.5 cm long, and 0.8 cm diam., light violet (16A4–19A5) to violet brown (10F7) when fresh, light brown (6D8) to dark brown (7F7) when dry, sunken, rugous.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with simple-septa, CB–, IKI–, tissues having a dark greenish-blue color in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae thin-walled, colorless, rarely branched, inflated, interwoven, mostly 4–7.5 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin-walled, colorless, partially crystalline, unbranched, more or less parallel along spines, long-cell, straight, 2–4 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae thin-walled, colorless, rarely branched, inflated, long-cell, straight, 3.5–8 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, with four sterigmata, and a basal simple-septa, 21–31 × 6–7 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid to ovoid, brown, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, less than 1.0 μm long, (3.5–)4–4.5 × 3–3.5(–4) μm, L = 4.09 μm, W = 3.07 μm, Q = 1.14–1.50 (n = 60/2), CB–, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, Guilin City, Xing'an County, Gaoshang Town, GPS coordinates 25°24′58″ N, 110°35′30″ E, altitude 1,100 m, ground in mixed forest, 3 April, 2024, Yuan 19293 (IFP 020028, GenBank ITS: PQ805353; LSU: PV257892; SSU: PV257931).

      Notes – In the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3), the new species Hydnellum porphyreum is grouped into Hydnellum, and is clustered with Hyd. fuscoindicum and Hyd. liantaishanense. Hyd. porphyreum resembles Hyd. fuscoindicum in having ellipsoid, tuberculate basidiospores[122]. However, Hyd. fuscoindicum differs from Hyd. porphyreum due to its broader pileus (3–13 cm), longer stipe (2–5 μm), and wider basidia (7–8 μm)[122]. Hyd. porphyreum resembles Hyd. bomiense and Hyd. yunnanense in having similar-sized pileus. However, Hyd. bomiense differs from Hyd. porphyreum due to grayish yellow to dark brown pileal surface, longer stipes (up to 2 cm), and spines (up to 1.1 mm)[36]. Hyd. yunnanense differs from Hyd. porphyreum by its grayish red to dark brown pileal surface, longer stipes (up to 4 cm) and larger basidiospores ([4.1–]4.2–5.1[–5.3] × [3.4–]3.5–4.5[–5] µm)[36].

      Hydnellum testaceum L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 24,25

      Fungal Names number: FN 572436

      Figure 24. 

      Basidiomata of Hydnellum testaceum (holotype IFP 020030).

      Figure 25. 

      Microscopic structures of Hydnellum testaceum (drawn from the holotype IFP 020030). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Hydnellum testaceum is characterized by the choanoid, ellipsoid to subcircular pileus, vivid red to brick red pileal surfaces, spines sometimes in groups of three, and ellipsoid to subglobose basidiospores.

      Etymology – Testaceum (Lat.): referring to the basidiomata being brick-red when fresh.

      Type – China, Zhejiang Province, Shaoxing City, Xinchang county, GPS coordinates 29°30′11″ N, 120°53′59″ E, altitude 300 m, ground in Pinus spp. forest, 21 April, 2024, Yuan 19305 (holotype: IFP 020030, GenBank ITS: PQ805346; LSU: PV257887; SSU: PV257927).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, gregarious, fleshy when fresh, becoming hard and brittle when dry, corky, taste mild, not releasing a smell. Pileus choanoid, ellipsoid to subcircular, 40–50 mm long, and 30–45 mm across, occasionally duplex, often incurved margins, hard and brittle, usually uneven and bumpy, concentrically zonate, surface covered with velvety to tomentose, and becoming crateriform with age, away from the center, and becoming lighter in color, vivid red (9A8–11A8) to brick red (7D7) when fresh, brown (6D4–7F8) when dry. Spines conical, solitary, more than 2 mm long, sometimes in groups of three, decurrent on stipe, brick red (7D7) when fresh, brown (6D4–7F8) when dry, brittle. Stipe clavate, middle, surface with tomentose, inside corky, usually incorporates individual litter, brick red (7D7) when fresh, brown (6D4–7F8) when dry, hard and brittle.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with simple-septa, colorless, smooth, thin- to slightly thick-walled, CB–, IKI–, tissues black in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick-walled, infrequent branched, regularly arranged, parallel, uninflated, sometimes flexuous, long-cell, unequal septate, 2–5 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick‐walled, frequent branched, parallel along spines, uninflated, long-cell, unequal septate, sometimes flexuous, 2–3 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, long-cell, unequal septate, irregularly interwove, infrequent branched, uninflated, sometimes flexuous, 2–4 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, colorless, smooth, four sterigmata, constricted at the basal, 21‒34 × 4‒6 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid to subglobose, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, sometimes in groups of two, up to 1 μm long, (2.5‒)3.0–4 × 2.5‒3.5 μm, L = 3.6 μm, W = 3.0 μm, Q = 1–1.38 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – In the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3), the new species Hydnellum testaceum is grouped into Hydnellum, forming a monophyletic lineage closely associated with Hyd. atrorubrum. Hyd. testaceum shares similarities with Hyd. atrorubrum characterized by the monomitic hyphal system with simple-septate generative hyphae and tomentose stipe surface. However, Hyd. atrorubrum can be delimited from Hyd. testaceum by its darker color of pileus surface (surface light brown to dark ruby), and larger basidiospores ([4.1–]4.5–6[–6.1] × [3.2–]3.9–5.1[–6] μm)[36]. Hyd. testaceum shares similarities with Hyd. squamulosum and Hyd. yunnanense showing red pileal surface with white margin. However, Hyd. squamulosum can be distinguished from Hyd. testaceum in its smaller pileus (< 35 mm), shorter spines (< 2 mm), and larger basidiospores ([4–]4.1–5[–5.1] × [3.2–]3.3–4.1[–4.2] µm)[36]. Hyd. yunnanense differs from Hyd. testaceum by its shorter spines (< 1.5 mm), and basidia (13–28 μm)[36].

      Hydnellum tomentosum L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 26,27

      Fungal Names number: FN 572430

      Figure 26. 

      Basidiomata of Hydnellum tomentosum (holotype IFP 020019).

      Figure 27. 

      Microscopic structures of Hydnellum tomentosum (drawn from the holotype IFP 020019). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Hydnellum tomentosum is characterized by the flabelliform to subcircular pileus, pinkish white to brown pileal surfaces, tomentose stipes, and clavate or sinuous basidia.

      Etymology – Tomentosum (Lat.): referring to the pileus covered with tomentum.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Dali City, Shuanglang Town, Liantai Mountain, GPS coordinates 25°56′37″ N, 100°17′18″ E, altitude 2,988 m, ground in mixed forest, 7 September, 2024, Yuan 21017 (holotype: IFP 020019, GenBank ITS: PQ805350; LSU: PV257889).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, gregarious, fleshy when fresh, becoming hard and brittle when drying, taste mild, not releasing a smell. Pileus flabelliform to subcircular, 15–50 mm long, and 11–37 mm across, occasionally duplex, often incurved margins, stiff and brittle, usually uneven and bumpy, concentrically zonate, surface covered with velvety to tomentose, and becoming crateriform with age, away from the center, and becoming lighter in color, pinkish white (10A2) to violet brown (10E4–11F8) when fresh, pale red (7A3–12A3) to brown (6D4–7F8) when dry. Spines conical, solitary, more than 3 mm long, decurrent on stipe, brittle when dry, flesh light brown (5D4–7D8), surface pastel red (7A4–10A4) at basal and white at apex when fresh, greyish ruby (12C3–12E7) to dark brown (6F4–9F8) when dry. Stipe clavate, 16–50 mm long, and 5–13 mm across, middle, surface with tomentose, inside corky, usually incorporates individual litter, hard and brittle when dry, brown (6D4–7F8) when fresh and dry.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with simple-septa, thin- to thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues yellowish in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick-walled, colorless, sparsely branched, irregularly arranged, uninflated, sometimes flexuous, long-cell, 2–6 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, colorless, infrequent branched, parallel along spines, uninflated, long-cell, straight, 2–4 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae thick-walled, colorless, long-cell, irregularly arranged, unbranched, uninflated, sometimes flexuous, the septate unequal, 3–6 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate or sinuous, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, four sterigmata, constricted at the basal, 19‒29 × 3‒4 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subglobose to globose, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, sometimes in groups of two, up to 1 μm long, 3.0–4 × (2.6‒)2.8‒3.0(‒3.2) μm, L = 3.3 μm, W = 3.0 μm, Q = 1–1.33 (n = 60/2), CB–, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Yunnan Province, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Nanjian Yi Autonomous County, Lingbao Mountain National Forest Park, GPS coordinates 24°46′37″ N, 100°30′23″ E, altitude 2,500 m, ground in mixed forest, 19 September, 2019, Yuan 14387 (IFP 020020, GenBank ITS: MW579970; LSU: MW579908; SSU: MW579934).

      Notes – The new species Hydnellum tomentosum is identified as a sister to Hyd. melanocarpum (Fig. 3). Hyd. tomentosum resembles Hyd. melanocarpum in sharing the odorless basidiomata. However, Hyd. melanocarpum differs from Hyd. tomentosum due to its glabrous stipe, wider basidia (18–38 × 5–7 µm) and smaller basidiospores (4.5–5.5[–6] × [3.5–]3.8–5.1 µm)[94]. Hyd. tomentosum shares similarities with Hyd. atrorubrum and Hyd. brunneorubrum showing brownish red pileus with white margin. However, Hyd. atrorubrum can be distinguished from Hyd. tomentosum in its larger basidia (20–48 × 5–8 µm), and basidiospores ([4.1–]4.5–6[–6.1] × [3.2–]3.9–5.1[–6] µm)[36]. Hyd. brunneorubrum differs from Hyd. tomentosum by its longer spines (up to 4 mm), shorter stipe (< 3 cm), and larger basidia (12–50 × 3–7 µm)[36].

      Neosarcodon Xiao L. He, Di Wang & W.H. Peng

      Index Fungorum number: IF 849989

      Type species – Neosarcodon pakaraimensis (A.C. Grupe & T.W. Henkel) Xiao L. He, Di Wang & W.H. Peng

      Notes – Larsson et al.[127] identified a clade of stipitate Thelephorales consisting of neotropical Sarcodon species, proposing that it might represent an undescribed genus, temporarily referred to as 'Neosarcodon'. Neosarcodon was later formally described by Wang et al.[64]. Neosarcodon has terrestrial, stipitate-pileate basidiomata. Pileus conic, surface smooth to fibrillose. Stipe hollow to solid, concolorous with pileus or slightly paler. Spines adnate, white or pallid at first, later with some shade of brownish gray. Context fleshy, soft, brittle, whitish to pale grayish. Odor indistinct. Hyphae inflated and thin-walled, frequent clamp connections. Basidiospores generally subglobose, tuberculate, brown in mass. Cystidia absent. In this study, species diversity of Neosarcodon in South China was analyzed based on morphological and molecular evidence (ITS, nLSU, and nSSU) (Fig. 4), two new species N. atroviolaceus and N. bambusicola are introduced.

      Neosarcodon atroviolaceus L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 28,29

      Fungal Names number: FN 572437

      Figure 28. 

      Basidiomata of Neosarcodon atroviolaceus (holotype IFP 020031). Photo by Jian-Feng Tan.

      Figure 29. 

      Microscopic structures of Neosarcodon atroviolaceus (drawn from the holotype IFP 020031). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from context. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Neosarcodon atroviolaceus is characterized by the dark violet pileus when fresh, spines growing to the pileus margin, stipe covered with reticulated fiber and epllisoid to globose basidiospores.

      Etymology – Atroviolaceus (Lat.): referring to the basidiomata is dark violet when fresh.

      Type – China, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou City, Huangpu District, Tianlu Lake, GPS coordinates 23°13′49″ N, 113°24′20″ E, altitude 116 m, ground in bamboo groves, 13 May, 2024, Yuan 19330 (holotype IFP 020031, GenBank ITS: PV221948; SSU: PV440981).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, gregarious, soft and fleshy when fresh, becoming brittle and light in weight upon dry, taste mild, slight smell. Pileus subcircle to circle, 30–50 mm long, and 30–45 mm across, smooth, glossy, thin, hard, brittle, often incurved margins, dark violet (15F3–18F8) when fresh, yellowish brown (5D4–5F8) when dry. Spines conical, stocky, less than 3 mm long, isolated, growing to the edge of pileus, without decurrent on stipe, schizogenous, deep violet (15D8–18E8) when fresh, reddish brown (8D4–9F8) to dark brown (6F4–9F8) when dry, brittle. Stipe clavate to cylindrical, 40–55 mm long, and 5–10 mm across, middle, smooth, covered with reticulated fiber, unincorporates litter, deep violet (15D8–18E8) when fresh, olive brown (4D3–4F8) when dry, hard.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, thin- to slightly thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues black in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, colorless, moderately branched, uninflated, long cell, unequal septate, parallel interwoven, 4–13 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, colorless, sparsely branched, parallel interwoven along spines, straight, long cell, unequal septate, 3–14 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, smooth, colorless, frequently branched, parallel interwoven, more or less flexous, 2–8.5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, 4 sterigmata, sterigmata up to 6 μm, inflated at the apex, with a clamp connection at the base, 24–37 × 7–10 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores epllisoid to globose, colorless, slightly thick-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated or grouped in 2, less than 2.0 μm long, 5–6 × (4.5–)5–5.5(–6) μm, L = 5.2 μm, W = 5.0 μm, Q = 1–1.1 (n = 30/1), CB+, IKI–.

      Notes – In the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 4), the new species Neosarcodon atroviolaceus is closely associated with N. pallidogriseus. However, N. pallidogriseus can be delimited from N. atroviolaceus by its larger basidia ([30−]34−41[−44] × 10−13[−15] μm), narrower pileus (8−16 mm broad), and stipe (2−5 mm broad)[129]. N. atroviolaceus is similar to N. quercophilus in having deep violet pileus, spine, and stipe[130]. However, N. quercophilus differs from N. atroviolaceus by its wider basidiospores (7–9 μm), and longer basidia (10–16 μm)[130].

      Neosarcodon bambusicola L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 30,31

      Diagnosis – Neosarcodon bambusicola is characterized by the greyish green to brown pileus, stipe covered with reticulated fiber and epllisoid to subglobose basidiospores.

      Fungal Names number: FN 572439

      Figure 30. 

      Basidiomata of Neosarcodon bambusicola (holotype IFP 020033). Photo by Zhong-Ping Feng.

      Figure 31. 

      Microscopic structures of Neosarcodon bambusicola (drawn from the holotype IFP 020033). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Etymology – Bambusicola (Lat.): referring to this species exclusively growing in bamboo groves.

      Type – China, Sichuan Province, Guang'an City, Linshui County, Dingping Town, GPS coordinates 30°20′10″ N, 106°55′42″ E, altitude 351 m, ground in bamboo groves (Phyllostachys edulis), 2 July, 2024, Yuan19491 (holotype: IFP 020033, GenBank ITS: PV221949; SSU: PV440979).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, solitary to gregarious, soft and fleshy when fresh, becoming brittle and light in weight upon dry, taste mild, not releasing a smell. Pileus subcircle to circle, 30–55 mm long, and 25–50 mm across, hard, brittle, smooth, surface without tomentose, often incurved margins, greyish green (1C3–1D7) to brown (6D4–7F8) when fresh, greyish green(1C3–1D7) to olive green (2F6) when dry, involuted. Spines conical, up to 2 mm long, isolated, without decurrent on stipe, violet grey (15B2–18F2) when fresh, olive green (2F6) when dry, brittle. Stipe clavate, 50–55 mm long, and 15–20 mm across, middle, smooth, covered with reticulated fiber, unincorporates litter, dark violet (15F3–18F8) when fresh, olive green (2F6) when dry, hard.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin-walled, CB–, IKI–, tissues black in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae thin-walled, smooth, colorless, sparsely branched, uninflated, unequal septate, parallel interwoven, 4–8 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin-walled, smooth, colorless, sparsely branched, parallel along spines, straight, 1.5–3 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae thin-walled, smooth, colorless, unbranched, parallel interwoven, more or less flexous, 3–8 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, 4 sterigmata and with a simple-septa at the base, inflated at the apex, 18–29 × 6–10 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores epllisoid to subglobose, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated or grouped in twos, less than 2.0 μm long, (4–)4.5–5 × 3–4.5 μm, L = 4.86 μm, W = 3.98 μm, Q = 1.11–1.43 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Note – The new species Neosarcodon bambusicola is grouped within Neosarcodon, and clusters with N. atroviridis, N. portoricensis, and N. quercophilus (Fig. 4). N. atroviridis can be delimited from N. bambusicola by its longer basidia ([25.0–]30.0–50.0 × [6.0–]7.5–11.0 μm) and larger basidiospores (7.0–8.5[–9.0] × 6.0–7.5 μm)[131]. N. portoricensis differs from N. bambusicola by its grayish brown pileus surface, smaller stipe (22–48 × 5–7 mm) and basidia ([30–]33–44[–48] × 8–13 µm)[130]. N. quercophilus differentiates from N. bambusicola in its narrower pileus (18–33 mm broad), slenderer stipe (40–75 × 4–8 mm) and larger basidiospores (5–7 × 7–9 µm)[130]. N. bambusicola resembles N. bairdii in having greyish to olive pileus[129]. However, N. bairdii differs from N. bambusicola by its grayish brown spines, shorter stipes (30–50 mm) and larger basidiospores ([5–]6–7 × 7–8[–9] µm)[129].

      Sarcodon Quél. ex P. Karst.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 18501

      Type species – Sarcodon imbricatus (L.) P. Karst.

      Notes – Sarcodon was established by Finnish mycologist Petter Adolf Karsten[132], with Sarcodon imbricatus designated as the type species. Karsten[133] assigned it in the Hydnaceae within the Polyporales based on the characteristic of hydnoid hymenophore. However, the taxonomic position of Sarcodon has long been a subject of debate. Banker[134] maintained its placement in the Hydnaceae, while other studies suggested a closer affinity with the Thelephoraceae. As mycological taxonomy advanced, the taxonomic position of Sarcodon gradually became clearer. Maas Geesteranus[124] conducted a systematic morphological study of Sarcodon species in Europe, describing several new species and revising the boundaries of the genus. Phylogenetic analyses have shown that the genus Sarcodon belongs to the order Thelephorales, and is closely related to the genera Hydnellum and Neosarcodon[35,64,126,135]. In this study, one new species of Sarcodon is introduced from China based on morphological characteristics and phylogenetic analyses inferred from ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequences (Fig. 4).

      Sarcodon squamulosus L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 32,33

      Fungal Names number: FN 572444

      Figure 32. 

      Basidiomata of Sarcodon squamulosus (holotype IFP 020045). Photo by Yang-Ling Deng.

      Figure 33. 

      Microscopic structures of Sarcodon squamulosus (drawn from the holotype IFP 020045). (a) Section through spines. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphae from pileus. (e) Hyphae from stipe.

      Diagnosis – Sarcodon squamulosus is characterized by the cream basidiomata when fresh, tomentose stipe surface, decurrent spines on the stipe, and basidiospores with oily-like contents.

      Etymology – Squamulosus (Lat.): referring to the pileal surface covered with small scales.

      Type – China, Hunan Province, Shaoyang City, Xinning County, Huilongsi Town, GPS coordinates 26°44′33″ N, 111°6′53″ E, altitude 300 m, ground in mixed forest, 28 September, 2024, Yuan 21453 (holotype: IFP 020045, GenBank ITS: PQ805359; LSU: PV257883; SSU: PV257923).

      Description – Basidiomata terrestrial, stipitate, annual, solitary to gregarious, soft and fleshy when fresh, becoming brittle and light in weight upon dry, taste slightly bitter, not releasing a smell. Pileus planar, ellipsoid to circle, 45–60 mm long, and 35–50 mm across, often incurved margins, involuted after drying, radiating projecting fibrils aggregate into bundles becoming dark brown (6F4–9F8) scales-like, beige when fresh and later to black, cream (4A3) when fresh, greyish yellow (4B3–4B6) to light brown (5D4–7D8) when dry, rarely lobed. Spines conical, up to 2 mm long, isolated, decurrent on stipe, cream (4A3) when fresh, surface beige (4C3) to light brown (5D4–7D8), inner beige (4C3) when dry, brittle. Stipe clavate, middle, surface with tomentose, becoming fibrils when dry covered with surface, usually unincorporates litter, cream (4A3) when fresh, pale yellow (1A3–4A3) when dry, brittle.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, colorless, smooth, thin- to slightly thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, sparsely branched, inflated, and up to 21 μm, long cell, unequal septate, irregularly interwoven, 3–14 μm diam.

      Spines – Generative hyphae thin-walled, infrequently branched, parallel along spines, straight, 2–4 μm diam.

      Stipe – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, infrequently branched, parallel, straight, 3–11 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate, smooth, colorless, thin-walled, four sterigmata, and with a clamp connection at the base, 21–48 × 5–9 μm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subglobose to globose, irregular, more or less with oily-like contents, colorless, thin-walled, tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated or grouped in two or more, bi- to trifurcate-like in shape, up to 2.0 μm long, (3–)4–5 × 3–4.5(–5) μm, L = 4.5 μm, W = 3.8 μm, Q = 1–1.33 (n = 60/2), CB–, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratypes) – China, Chongqing City, Banan District, Fengsheng Town, GPS coordinates 29°31′18″ N, 106°56′5″ E, altitude 550 m, ground in Pinus spp. and Quercus spp. forests, 12 October, 2023, Yuan 19208 (IFP 020046, GenBank ITS: PQ805361), Yuan 19209 (IFP 020047, GenBank ITS: PQ805360).

      Notes – In this study, the new species Sarcodon squamulosus is placed within Sarcodon (Fig. 4), and it forms a clade with S. quercinofibulatus. S. squamulosus resembles S. quercinofibulatus by the monomitic hyphal system with clamped generative hyphae. However, S. quercinofibulatus differs from S. squamulosus by its wider basidia (30–40 µm vs 8–10 µm), larger basidiospores ([6–]6.5–7.4[–8] µm vs [5–]5.4–6.4[–7] µm) and larger pileus (14 cm)[136]. S. squamulosus is similar to S. leucopus in sharing off-white pileus, and fleshy basidiomata[64]. However, S. leucopus can be distinguished from S. squamulosus by its smooth pileal surface, shorter spines (< 1.5 mm), and presence of cystidia[64,137]. S. squamulosus is similar to S. pseudoimbricatus in sharing pileus with scales. However, S. pseudoimbricatus differs from S. squamulosus by its longer spines (up to 0.7 cm), larger basidiospores (6–7.5×4.5–5.5[–6] μm), and the presence of cystidia[64].

      Sequence alignment analysis indicated that the ITS sequence of this species shared high similarity with the corresponding sequence in the UNITE database, with only one nucleotide difference identified between them. This sequence was obtained from a sample collected in Chuxiong (Yunnan Province, China), representing a new distribution site of this species in China.

      Thelephoraceae Chevall.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 81463

      Type genus – Thelephora Ehrh. ex Willd.

      Odontia Pers.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 790576

      Type species – Odontia ferruginea Pers.

      Notes – Odontia was established by Persoon in 1794, with O. ferruginea designated as the type species. Historically, Odontia has been treated as a synonym of Tomentella. However, the phylogenetic analyses have revealed that Odontia constitutes a monophyletic lineage related to Tomentella. Notably, species within Odontia exhibit a saprotrophic lifestyle, distinct from the ectomycorrhizal habit typical of Tomentella[49,138]. Morphologically, Odontia is characterized by resupinate, arachnoid basidiomata that are easily separable from the substrate; a hymenophoral surface ranging from smooth to granulose or hydnoid; a dimitic hyphal system in rhizomorphs; a monomitic or dimitic hyphal system in the subiculum; clavate basidia and irregular ellipsoid to globose basidiospores with verruculose ornamentation[43,139,140]. Species of Odontia have been reported across temperate regions of Eurasia, North America, Africa, France, Australia, New Zealand, China, and Turkey[43,49,138,139,141143]. In the present study, a new species of Odontia from China is described, based on morphological characteristics, and phylogenetic analyses inferred from ITS, nLSU, and nSSU sequences (Fig. 5).

      Odontia kunmingensis Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 34,35

      Fungal Names number: FN 572440

      Figure 34. 

      Basidiomata of Odontia kunmingensis (holotype IFP 020034).

      Figure 35. 

      Microscopic structures of Odontia kunmingensis (drawn from the holotype IFP 020034). (a) Section through rhizomorph. (b) Section through basidiomata. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Odontia kunmingensis is characterized by the type C rhizomorphs, yellowish brown to brown hymenophoral surface, and irregular subglobose to ellipsoid basidiospores.

      Etymology – Kunmingensis (Lat.): referring to the Kunming City, where the type is collected.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Kunming City, the Golden Hall Scenic Area, GPS coordinates 25°5′4″ N, 102°46′19″ E, altitude 2,000 m, on fallen angiosperm branch, 17 August, 2023, Yuan 18400 (holotype: IFP 020034, GenBank ITS: PV259700; LSU: PX024029; SSU: PV505424).

      Description – Basidiomata, annual, resupinate, easily separable from the substrate, arachnoid, continuous, soft coriaceous to leathery, and without odor or taste when fresh, becoming cottony upon drying, up to 0.2 mm thick. Hymenophoral surface yellowish brown to brown (5D8–6F8) when dry, smooth, turning lighter or concolorous with subiculum. Subiculum mostly brown. Sterile margin determinate, byssoid, concolorous, with hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs – Present in subiculum and margins, 20–50 μm diam, rhizomorph surface rather smooth, hyphal structure in rhizomorphs dimitic, differentiated, of type C (according to Agerer 1987–2008), compactly arranged, generative hyphae in the center of the rhizomorph with simple-septate, thick-walled, 2–3 μm diam, colorless in KOH, skeletal hyphae at outer part of rhizomorph thin-walled, 1 μm diam, grayish yellow in KOH, CB+, IKI–.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with simple-septa, thick-walled, 4–6 μm diam, without encrustation, grayish yellow in KOH, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae with simple-septa, thin-walled, 2–4 μm diam, occasionally collapsed, hyphal cells more or less uniform, colorless in KOH, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia – 35–40 μm long and 4–7 μm diam at apex, 2–4 μm at base, clavate, not stalked, not sinuous, grayish yellow in KOH and in distilled water, 4 sterigmata and with a simple-septa at the base, sterigmata 2–4 μm long, 0.5–1 μm diam at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores irregular subglobose to ellipsoid in frontal face and irregular subglobose in lateral face, oildrops absent, light brown in KOH, and in distilled water, thin-walled, verruculose, warts usually grouped in two or more, alike in shape, 0.5 μm long, (5.9–)6.2–8.2(–8.9) × (5.4–)5.8–7.5(–7.8) μm, L = 7.18 μm, W = 6.51 μm, Q = 1–1.3 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – The new species Odontia kunmingensis forms a clade with O. fibrosa and O. parvispina (Fig. 5). They share similar morphological and anatomical characteristics: annual, resupinate, arachnoid basidiomata, brown subiculum, the presence of rhizomorphs with a dimitic hyphal system, simple-septate generative hyphae in the subiculum, and clavate basidia[139,140]. However, O. fibrosa can be differentiated by thicker basidiomata (up to 0.4 mm vs up to 0.2 mm in O. kunmingensis), dark brown and granulose hymenophoral surface when dry, longer spines (up to 1 mm), and larger basidiospores (7.1–9 × 6.1–8 μm vs 6.2–8.2 × 5.8–7.5 μm in O. kunmingensis). O. parvispina differs from O. kunmingensis by its hydnoid hymenophoral surface (spines up to 0.06 mm long), narrower generative hyphae (3–4 μm vs 4–6 μm in O. kunmingensis), and smaller basidiospores (6–7 × 5–6.4 μm vs 6.2–8.2 × 5.8–7.5 μm in O. kunmingensis)[140].

      Thelephora Ehrh. ex Willd.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 18640

      Type species – Thelephora terrestris Ehrh.

      Notes – Thelephora Ehrh. ex Willd. was established by Willdenow, with Thelephora terrestris Ehrh. designated as the type species[144146]. In 1794, Persoon discovered and described the first villaceous fungus, Odontia ferruginea Pers, which was subsequently transferred to Tomentella as Tomentella ferruginea (Pers.) Pat. by Patouillard in 1887. Since then, taxonomic studies on Tomentella have gradually advanced, revealing that the genus exhibits diverse and complex morphological features, including basidiomata with various colors, basidiospores with diverse shapes and ornamentations, and hymenophoral surfaces ranging from smooth to granulose[43,142]. Thelephora and Tomentella are taxonomically closely related, typically forming a paraphyletic group within the same evolutionary clade[37,38,147149]. They share several morphological similarities, such as a monomitic hyphal system with clamped generative hyphae and ornamented (warted to echinulate) basidiospores. However, Tomentella is distinguishable by its resupinate, effused, and tightly adherent basidiomata[8,43,149,150]. In their latest study, Kõljalg et al.[151] revised the classification of Tomentella, merging it with Thelephora. In this study, 193 species were included to construct the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 6), and 12 new species are described and illustrated, based on morphological characteristics, and phylogenetic evidence.

      Thelephora angusta Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 36,37

      Fungal Names number: FN 572908

      Figure 36. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora angusta (holotype IFP 020075).

      Figure 37. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora angusta (drawn from the holotype IFP 020075). (a) Section through rhizomorph. (b) Section through basidiomata. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora angusta is characterized by the type B rhizomorphs, light brown to reddish grey hymenophoral surface, subglobose to ellipsoid (irregular lobed) basidiospores.

      Etymology – Angusta (Lat.): referring to the narrow rhizomorphs of the type.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Shangri-La City, Potatso National Park, GPS coordinates 27°50′12″ N, 99°57′27″ E, altitude 3,655 m, on bark of Abies sp., 15 August, 2023, Yuan 18145 (holotype: IFP 020075, GenBank ITS: PV843164; LSU: PV843171; mtSSU: PV856499).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, separable from the substrate, mucedinoid, without odor or taste when fresh, 0.4–0.7 mm thick, continuous. Hymenophoral surface smooth, light brown to reddish grey (7D6–7B2), and turning darker than subiculum. Sterile margin often determinate, byssoid, whitish, paler than hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs – Present in subiculum and margins, 15–50 μm diam, rhizomorphic surface more or less smooth, hyphae in rhizomorph monomitic, undifferentiated, of type B, compactly arranged and of uniform, single hyphae with clamp connections and simple-septa, slightly thick- to thick-walled, unbranched, 1–3.5 μm diam, pale brown in KOH, CB+, IKI–.

      Subiculum – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections and rarely simple-septa, slightly thick- to thick-walled, branched, 3–6 µm diameter, occasionally collapsed, without encrustation, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae clamped, slightly thick- to thin-walled, occasionally branched, 1.5–4 µm diameter, without encrustation, hyphal cells: more or less uniform, grayish yellow in KOH and in distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Basidia – 25–45 µm long and 4–6.5 µm diameter at apex, 3–4 µm at base, with a clamp connection at the base, clavate, not stalked, sinuous, without transverse septa, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, four sterigmata, sterigmata 2.5–3.5 µm long, and 0.8–1µm diameter at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid (irregular lobed) in frontal and ellipsoid (irregular lobed) in lateral face (in small amounts also ellipsoid to subglobose), pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, thick-walled, echinulate to aculeate, echinuli or aculei usually isolated, sometimes grouped in 2, up to 1.5 µm long, (6.8–)7–8.5(–9.1) × (5.1–)5.6–7.5(–8.2) µm, L = 7.79 µm, W = 6.53 µm, Q = 1–1.48 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Yunnan Province, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Deqin County, Baima Snow Mountain National Nature Reserve, GPS coordinates 28°20′4″ N, 99°5′49″ E, altitude 3,500 m, fallen angiosperm branch, 13 August, 2023, Yuan 17935 (IFP 020076, GenBank ITS: PV843165; LSU: PV843172; mtSSU: PV856500).

      Notes – In this study (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora angusta is grouped with T. viridula, T. pyrolae, T. subtestacea, T. galzinii, and T. tenuifarinacea. They exhibit some similar characteristics: resupinate basidiomata. However, T. pyrolae differs from T. angusta by its longer basidia (50–65 µm), larger basidiospores (7.5–11 µm across), and the absences of rhizomorphs[142]. T. subtestacea can be distiniguished from T. angusta by its narrower subicular hyphae, absences of rhizomorphs and presences of cystidia[43]. T. galzinii differentiates from T. angusta by its wider subhymenophoral hyphae, and utriform basidia[43]. T. tenuifarinacea differs from T. angusta by its wider basidia, subglobose to globose, and nodulose to verrucose basidiospores[99].

      Thelephora bomiensis Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 38,39

      Fungal Names number: FN 572449

      Figure 38. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora bomiensis (holotype IFP 020056).

      Figure 39. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora bomiensis (drawn from the holotype IFP 020056). (a) Section through basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora bomiensis is characterized by the grayish brown hymenophoral surface, long sterigmata (4–7 µm), and irregular ellipsoid to subglobose (irregularly lobed) basidiospores.

      Etymology – Bomiensis (Lat.): referring to the locality (Bomi County) of the type.

      Type – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Bomi County, GPS coordinates 29°52′25″ N, 95°45′5″ E, altitude 2,730 m, on angiosperm wood debris, 17 July, 2019, Yuan 13610 (holotype: IFP 020056, GenBank ITS: PQ656819; SSU: PV440978).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adherent to the substrate, arachnoid, without odor or taste when fresh, 0.1 mm thick, uncontinuous. Hymenophoral surface smooth, grayish brown (5D3) and concolorous with the subiculum. Sterile margin often indeterminate, byssoid, concolorous with hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs – Absent.

      Subiculum – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections and rarely simple-septa, thick-walled, occasionally branched, 3–5 µm diameter, without encrustation, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin-walled, occasionally branched, 2.5–4 µm diameter, without encrustation, hyphal cells more or less uniform, grayish yellow in KOH and in distilled water, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia – 25–45 µm long, and 5–7 µm diameter at apex, 3–6 µm at base, with a clamp connection at the base, clavate, not stalked, sinuous, without transverse septa, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, four sterigmata, sterigmata 4–7 µm long, and 1–2 µm diameter at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in frontal (in small amounts also subglobose), and ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in lateral face (in small amounts also subtriangular), pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, slightly thick-walled, echinulate to aculeate, echinuli or aculei usually isolated, sometimes grouped in two or more, up to 1.5 µm long, (5.2–)6.2–8.2(–8.9) × (4.5–)4.9–7.6(–8) µm, L = 7.27 µm, W = 6.22 µm, Q = 1.01–1.32 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Chayu County, Rangshequ 3rd Middle Bridge, GPS coordinates 28°35′23″ N, 98°20′36″ E, altitude 3,550 m, on fallen branch of Pinus sp., 13 July, 2019, Yuan 13506 (IFP 020057, GenBank ITS: PQ656818; LSU: PV257905; SSU: PV440977).

      Notes – In this study (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora bomiensis is grouped within Thelephora, forming a monophyletic lineage, and is closely associated with T. brevis. T. bomiensis resembles T. brevis by sharing uncontinuous basidiomata, the color of hymenophoral surface, and the shape of basidiospores[102]. However, T. bomiensis differs from T. brevis by its longer basidia, larger basidiospores and the absences of rhizomorphs. T. bomiensis is similar to T. griseocastanea and T. olivaceobrunnea in sharing grayish brown hymenophoral surface[102]. However, T. griseocastanea differs from T. bomiensis by its wider subhymenophoral hyphae (4–6 μm) and smaller basidiospores ([5–]5.5–6.5[–7] × [4–]5–5.5[–6] μm)[102]. T. olivaceobrunnea differentiates from T. bomiensis in its granulose hymenophoral surface and wider subhymenophoral hyphae (4–7 μm)[102].

      Thelephora cacao Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 40,41

      Fungal Names number: FN 572909

      Figure 40. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora cacao (holotype IFP 020077).

      Figure 41. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora cacao (drawn from the holotype IFP 020077). (a) Hyphae from pileal context. (b) Section of hymenium and subhymenium. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora cacao is characterized by the imperceptibly rugose hymenophoral surface, chocolate brown stipe, and lacunary, sulcate, irregularly ridged abhymenial face.

      Etymology – Cacao (Lat.): referring to the dark brown hymenophoral surface.

      Type – China, Hunan Province, Shaoyang City, Xinning County, Huilongsi Town, GPS coordinates 26°34′48″ N, 111°4′48″ E, altitude 500 m, ground in mixed forest, 5 June, 2024, Yuan 19363 (holotype: IFP 020077, GenBank ITS: PV843166; LSU: PQ803816; SSU: PV856501; mtSSU: PV856546).

      Description – Basidiomata upright, up to 13 cm wide, and 3 cm high, solitary to gregarious, humid, and leathery when fresh, corky to hard and brittle when dry, pungent odor when dry. Pileus flat, flabelliform, petaloid to applanate-lobate, usually with multiple pilei arising from a shared stipe or center, and arranged in imbricate, rosette to flabelliform, margin 2–3 mm thick, nearly entire, rarely lacerate, imperceptibly wavy. Abhymenial face lacunary, sulcate, irregularly ridged, zonate, yellowish brown to grayish brown (5E6–5E) at the center then gradually becoming paler towards margin, but reddish blond (5C4) at the margin. Hymenophoral surface imperceptibly rugose, dark brown to brown (7F8–7F5) at the center, and becoming pale brown towards the margin, but brownish orange (5C3) at the margin. Stipe central, 20–30 × 10–25 mm, chocolate brown, subconical to broadened or flatted towards base, surface rugose, glabrous, dark brown (7F8–7F5).

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae commonly with clamp connections and rarely simple-septa, CB+, IKI–, tissues turned brown in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae slightly thick to thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, rarely branched, parallel to subparallel, 2.5–5 μm.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae slightly thick to thin-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, occasionally branched, often covered by dense crystals, subparallel, up to 1–3 μm.

      Basidia – Utriform to clavate, thin-walled, with a clamp connection at the base, multi-guttulate content sometimes very dense, occasionally covered by dense crystals, 20–45 × 4–7 μm, four sterigmata, sterigmata 5–6 μm long, and 1.5–2 μm diam. at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subtriangular to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in frontal view and ellipsoid to pyriform (irregularly lobed) in lateral view, brown in KOH, and in distilled water, thick-walled (< 1 μm), tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, sometimes in groups of two or more, 6.1–8.3(–8.5) × (5–)5.2–7.1 μm, L = 7.27 μm, W = 6.25 μm, Q = 1–1.41 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Hunan Province, Xiangxi Tujia and Miao Autonomous Prefecture, Huayuan County, GPS coordinates 28°34′48″ N, 109°28′48″ E, altitude 700 m, ground in mixed forest, 30 July, 2023, Yuan 17361 (IFP 020078, GenBank ITS: PQ656836; LSU: PQ803815; SSU: PV856502; mtSSU: PV856547).

      Notes – In the present study (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora cacao reveals it is clustered with T. bubalinomarginata and T. petaloides. In morphology, T. cacao resembles T. bubalinomarginata in having single to concrescent basidiomata, and strong fenugreek odor. However, T. bubalinomarginata can be delimited from T. cacao by its circular to irregular pilei, cylindrical stipes, and cylindrical basidiospores[13]. T. cacao shares similarities with T. petaloides in having flabelliform to applanate-lobate branches, sulcate or irregularly ridged abhymenial face, and irregularly cylindrical to flatted stipes[97]. However, T. petaloides can be distinguished from T. cacao by its imbricate to umbrella basidiomata, subglobose to subellipsoid basidiospores, and higher basidiomata[97].

      Thelephora chayuensis Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 42,43

      Fungal Names number: FN 572453

      Figure 42. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora chayuensis (holotype IFP 020064).

      Figure 43. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora chayuensis (drawn from the holotype IFP 020064). (a) Section through basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora chayuensis is characterized by the brown to dark brown hymenophoral surface, stalked basidia, and echinulate basidiospores (4.9–)5.6–7.9(–8.6) × (4.8–)5–6.8(–6.9) µm.

      Etymology – Chayuensis (Lat.): referring to the locality (Chayu County) of the type.

      Type – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Chayu County, Rangshequ 3rd Middle Bridge, GPS coordinates 28°35′23″ N, 98°20′36″ E, altitude 3,550 m, on fallen angiosperm branch, 13 July, 2019, Yuan 13502 (holotype: IFP 020064, GenBank ITS: PQ656831; LSU: PV257906).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, separable from the substrate, mucedinoid, without odor or taste when fresh, 0.4–0.8 mm thick, continuous. Hymenophoral surface smooth, brown to dark brown (6E7–6F7), and concolorous with the subiculum. Sterile margin often indeterminate, byssoid, concolorous with hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs – Absent.

      Subiculum – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, and rarely simple-septa, thick-walled, 3–5 µm diameter, without encrustation, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin-walled, 3–4 µm diameter, without encrustation, hyphal cells more or less uniform, pale brown in KOH, and in distilled water, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia – 20–50 µm long and 5–9 µm diameter at the apex, 2–4 µm at base, with a clamp connection at the base, clavate, stalked, without transverse septa, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, four sterigmata, sterigmata 2–3.5 µm long, and 1–2.5 µm diameter at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subtriangular to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in frontal (half also ellipsoid), and ovoid to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in lateral face, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, thick-walled, echinulate, echinulati usually isolated, sometimes grouped in two or more, up to 1 mm long, (4.9–)5.6–7.9(–8.6) × (4.8–)5–6.8(–6.9) µm, L = 6.48 µm, W = 6.1 µm, Q = 1.05–1.15 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratypes) – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Bomi County, GPS coordinates 29°52′25″ N, 95°45′5″ E, altitude 2,730 m, on fallen branch of Pinus sp., 19 July, 2019, Yuan 13716 (IFP 020065, GenBank ITS: PQ656832; LSU: PV257907); Yunnan Province, Kunming City, Xishan District, Xishan Scenic Area, GPS coordinates 24°58′ N, 102°38′ E, altitude 1,900 m, on fallen angiosperm branch, 14 August, 2019, Yuan 13990 (IFP 020066, GenBank ITS: PQ656833); Chuxiong Autonomous Prefecture, Wuding County, Shizi Mountain, GPS coordinates 25°32′11″ N, 102°22′24″ E, altitude 1,800 m, on fallen angiosperm branch, 27 September, 2019, Yuan 14494 (IFP 020067, GenBank ITS: PQ656834).

      Notes – The new species Thelephora chayuensis is grouped with the Thelephora species (Fig. 6), and is revealed as a sister to T. linzhiensis and T. liaoningensis. T. chayuensis resembles T. liaoningensis in having mucedinoid basidiomata, smooth hymenophoral surface, the absences of rhizomorphs, and the size of basidia. However, T. chayuensis differs from T. liaoningensis due to its narrower basidiospres, and dark brown to chestnut hymenophoral surface[102]. T. chayuensis is similar to T. coffeae and T. fuscofarinosa in having dark brown hymenophoral surface[102]. However, T. coffeae differs from T. chayuensis by its adherent basidiomata, and larger basidiospores ([6.5–]7–9[–9.5] × [6.5–]6.8–8.3[–8.5] μm)[102]. T. fuscofarinosa differentiates from T. chayuensis in its adherent basidiomata, and wider subhymenophoral hyphae (5–11 μm)[102].

      Thelephora fasciculata Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 44,45

      Fungal Names number: FN 572447

      Figure 44. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora fasciculata (holotype IFP 020052).

      Figure 45. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora fasciculata (drawn from the holotype IFP 020052). (a) Hyphae from pileal context. (b) Section of hymenium and subhymenium. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora fasciculata is characterized by the infundibuliform to ligulate pileus, dark violet basidiomata, white pileal margin, and clavillose to flatted or broadened stipe.

      Etymology – Fasciculata (Lat.): referring to the fasciculate basidiomata.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Shizong County, Junzishan National Forest Park, GPS coordinates 24°64′ N, 104°16′ E, altitude 2,409 m, ground in broad-leaved forest, 8 August, 2019, Yuan 13893 (holotype: IFP 020052, GenBank ITS: PQ656842; LSU: PQ803811; mtSSU: PV440375).

      Description – Basidiomata upright, solitary, gregarious to caespitose, small-sized, up to 2.5 cm high, and 2 cm wide, coriaceous when fresh, taste mild, almost no odor when dried. Pileus infundibuliform to ligulate, imbricate, usually with multiple pilei arising from a central stipe, margin slightly thin (0.1 mm), irregularly lobed to wavy. Abhymenial surface somewhat wrinkled, zonate, dark violet (18F5) near the center then violet grey (18B2) gradually towards margin, violet white (18A2) at the margin. Hymenophoral surface dark violet (18F5) gradually becoming deep violet to violet white (18E8–18A2) towards the margin. Stipe short and central, up to 0.5 cm long, dark violet (18F5), glabrous, clavillose to flatted or broadened.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae commonly with clamp connections and rarely simple-septa, CB+, IKI–, tissues turned black in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, moderately branched, sometimes flexuous and collapsed, subparallel to loosely interwoven, 3–5 μm diam.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, frequently branched often near the clamp connections, slightly inflated, loosely interwoven, up to 3–7 μm diam.

      Basidia – Clavate to subcylindrical, thin- to slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), with a clamp connection at the base, multi-guttulate content sometimes very dense, 40–80 × 10–12 μm, four sterigmata, sterigmata 7–11 μm long, and 2–3 μm diam. at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores globose to elliptic in frontal and lateral face, yellowish brown to pale green in KOH and in distilled water, slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), echinulate to aculeate, echinuli or aculei usually isolated, sometimes in groups of two or more, up to 1.5 μm long, (7.5–)8–9.5(–10) × (5.5–)6–7(–8) μm, L = 8.66 μm, W = 6.85 μm, Q = 1.23–1.26 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Fujian Province, Sanming City, Yongan City, GPS coordinates 25°56′ N, 117°21′ E, ground in broad-leaved forest, 2 July, 2024, Yuan 19490 (IFP 020053, GenBank ITS: PQ656843; LSU: PQ803812; SSU: PV257942; mtSSU: PV440376).

      Notes – In this study, the new species Thelephora fasciculata is classified within Thelephora (Fig. 6), and is clustered with T. palmata, T. regularis and T. yunnanensis. They have common characteristics features: pileus clustered pseudoclavate or cuneate branch arising from a central common base, absence of cystidia and basidiospores with echinulate ornamentation[99,152]. However, T. palmata can be distinguished from T. fasciculata by its deep purple to grayish-black pileus surface, larger basidia (70–100 × 9–12 µm), and purplish basidiospores[152]. T. fasciculata can be distinguished from T. regularis by black to purplish-red pileus surface, hymenophoral surface with 1–1.5 mm white aculeolus, and larger basidiospores (7.5–10 × 5.5–8 µm in T. fasciculata vs 6–8 × 4.5–6.5 μm in T. regularis)[152].

      Thelephora fasciculata shares similarly morphological characteristics with the tropical species T. versatilis, such as the pileus clustered pseudocoralloid branches, subhymenophoral hyphae frequent branching, and the basidiospores with echinulate ornamentation. However, T. versatilis can be distinguished from T. fasciculata by dark brown to yellowish-brown pileus surface, and smaller basidiospores (6–7 × 5–6 µm in T. versatilis vs 7.5–10 × 5.5–8 μm in T. fasciculata)[148].

      Thelephora latihypha Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 46,47

      Fungal Names number: FN 572910

      Figure 46. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora latihypha (holotype IFP 020079).

      Figure 47. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora latihypha (drawn from the holotype IFP 020079). (a) Section through basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora latihypha is characterized by the grey hymenophoral surface, broad subicular hyphae (5–8.5 µm), and subglobose to ellipsoid basidiospores (6.9–)7.1–9.2(–10) × (6.3–)6.6–8.2(–8.5) µm.

      Etymology – Latihypha (Lat.): referring to the broad hyphae.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Shangri-La City, Potatso National Park, GPS coordinates 27°50′12″ N, 99°57′27″ E, altitude 3,655 m, fallen branch of Abies sp., 15 August, 2023, Yuan 18172 (holotype: IFP 020079, GenBank ITS: PV843167).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adherent to the substrate, mucedinoid, without odor or taste when fresh, 1–2 mm thick, continuous. Hymenophoral surface smooth, grey (B1–D1), and concolorous with hymenophore. Sterile margin often indeterminate, byssoid, paler than hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs – Absent.

      Subiculum – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections and simple-septa, thick-walled, frequently branched, 5–8.5 µm diameter, with encrustation, pale brown in KOH and distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae with clamp connections, and simple-septa, thick-walled, frequently branched, 3–5 µm diameter, without encrustation, hyphal cells more or less uniform, pale brown in KOH, and in distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Basidia – 30–50 µm long, and 8.5–10 µm diameter at apex, 5–7 µm at base, with a clamp connection at the base, utriform, stalked, sinuous, without transverse septa, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, four sterigmata, sterigmata 4–7 µm long, and 1–1.5 µm in diameter at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospore ellipsoid in frontal face, and subglobose to ellipsoid in lateral face, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, thick-walled, echinulate, echinuli usually isolated, usually 1 µm long, sometimes up to 1.5 µm long, (6.9–)7.1–9.2(–10) × (6.3–)6.6–8.2(–8.5) µm, L = 8.1 µm, W = 7.3 µm, Q = 1.02–1.3 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Yunnan Province, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Shangri-La City, Potatso National Park, GPS coordinates 27°50′12″ N, 99°57′27″ E, altitude 3,655 m, fallen trunk of Abies sp., 13 August, 2023, Yuan 18228 (IFP 020080, GenBank ITS: PV843168; LSU: PV843173; SSU: PV856503).

      Notes – In this study (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora latihypha is grouped within Thelephora, and is closely associated with T. lapida. T. latihypha resembles T. lapida by sharing continuous arachnoid basidiomata, smooth hymenophoral surface, and the shape of basidia[43]. However, T. lapida differs from T. latihypha by its tomentose basidiomata, rusty brown to fuscous hymenophoral surface, and globose basidiospores[153]. T. latihypha is similar to T. cinereobrunnea and T. longiechinula in sharing grayish hymenophoral surface[37]. However, T. cinereobrunnea differs from T. latihypha by its separable basidiomata, narrower subicular hyphae (4–7 mm), and shorter basidia[37]. T. longiechinula differentiates from T. latihypha in its separable basidiomata, and wider subhymenophoral hyphae (4–7 mm)[37].

      Thelephora linzhiensis Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 48,49

      Fungal Names number: FN 572450

      Figure 48. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora linzhiensis (holotype IFP 020058).

      Figure 49. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora linzhiensis (drawn from the holotype IFP 020058). (a) Hyphae from a rhizomorph. (b) Section through basidiomata. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora linzhiensis is characterized by the type B rhizomorphs, brownish yellow to golden brown hymenophoral surface, and utriform basidia.

      Etymology – Linzhiensis (Lat.): referring to the locality (Linzhi City) of the type.

      Type – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Milin County, Nanyigou Nature Reserve, GPS coordinates 29°7′41″ N, 94°12′52″ E, altitude 2,500 m, on fallen angiosperm branch, 22 October, 2021, Yuan 16203 (holotype: IFP 020058, GenBank ITS: PQ656815; LSU: PV257904).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adherent to the substrate, arachnoid, without odor or taste when fresh, 0.1 mm thick, uncontinuous. Hymenophoral surface granulose or smooth, brownish yellow to golden brown (5C7–5D7), and concolorous with the subiculum. Sterile margin often indeterminate, byssoid, concolorous with hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs – Present in subiculum and margins, 10–55 µm diameter, rhizomorphic surface more or less smooth, hyphae in rhizomorph monomitic, undifferentiated, of type B (according to Agerer, 1987–2008), compactly arranged and uniform, single hyphae with clamp connections, thick-walled, occasionally branched, 4–7 µm diameter, pale brown to brown in KOH, CB+, IKI–.

      Subiculum – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections and rarely simple-septa, slightly thick to thick-walled, occasionally branched, 4–6 µm diameter, without encrustation, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin-walled, occasionally branched, 2.5–5 µm diameter, without encrustation, hyphal cells short and inflated, pale brown in KOH, and in distilled water, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia – 20–55 µm long, and 5–10 µm diameter at apex, 3–5 µm at base, with a clamp connection at the base, utriform, not stalked, sinuous, without transverse septa, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, four sterigmata, sterigmata 4–5 µm long, and 2–3 µm diameter at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subglobose to globose in frontal and lateral face, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, slightly thick-walled, echinulate to aculeate, echinuli or aculei usually isolated, up to 2 µm long, (6.8–)8.2–10.3(–11) × (6.2–)7.5–10(–10.8) µm, L = 9.44 µm, W = 8.63 µm, Q = 1–1.36 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Milin County, Nanyigou Nature Reserve, GPS coordinates 29°7′41″ N, 94°12′52″ E, altitude 2,500 m, on fallen angiosperm branch, 22 October, 2021, Yuan 16200 (IFP 020059, GenBank ITS: PQ656814; LSU: PV257903; SSU: PV440976).

      Notes – Based on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora linzhiensis is grouped with Thelephora species, and is revealed as a sister to T. chayuensis and T. liaoningensis. T. linzhiensis resembles T. chayuensis in having indeterminate and byssoid sterile margin, and basidiopoers with aculeate. However, T. linzhiensis differs from T. chayuensis due to its arachnoid basidiomata, granulose hymenophoral surface, and presence of the rhizomorphs. T. linzhiensis is similar to T. aurantispora and T. kanasensis in having yellowish brown hymenophoral surface[154]. However, T. aurantispora differs from T. linzhiensis by its wider subhymenophoral hyphae (3–7 µm), and narrower basidiospores ([6.5–]7–9[–9.5] × [5.5–]6–8[–8.5] µm)[154]. T. kanasensis differentiates from T. linzhiensis in its wider subhymenophoral hyphae (4–7 µm), and basidia (8–11 µm)[154].

      Thelephora longicystidiata Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 50,51

      Fungal Names number: FN 572911

      Figure 50. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora longicystidiata (holotype IFP 020081).

      Figure 51. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora longicystidiata (drawn from the holotype IFP 020081). (a) Section through basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora longicystidiata is characterized by the brownish orange to orange grey hymenophoral surface, clavate cystidia, and subtriangular, ellipsoid to globose (irregularly lobed) basidiospores.

      Etymology – Longicystidiata (Lat.): referring to the long cystidia of the type.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Yuxi City, Xinping Autonomous County, Gasa Town, GPS coordinates 21°57′11″ N, 100°45′42″ E, altitude 2,300 m, on angiosperm trunk, 6 August, 2023, Yuan 17428 (holotype: IFP 020081, GenBank ITS: PV843170).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adherent to the substrate, mucedinoid, without odor or taste when fresh, 0.1–1 mm thick, continuous. Hymenophoral surface smooth, brownish orange to orange grey (5C3–5B2), and turning darker than subiculum. Sterile margin often indeterminate, farinaceous, paler than hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs – Absent.

      Subiculum – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, slightly thick-walled, branched, 4–6 µm diameter, occasionally collapsed, without encrustation, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin-walled, occasionally branched, 2.5–4 µm diameter, occasionally collapsed, without encrustation, hyphal cells more or less uniform, pale brown in KOH, and in distilled water, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia – 25–55 µm long, and 7–9 µm diameter at apex, 5–7 µm at base, with a clamp connection at the base, clavate, not stalked, sinuous, without transverse septa, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, four sterigmata, sterigmata 5–7 µm long, and 1–1.5 µm diameter at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Clavate, arising from subhymenophoral hyphae, thin-walled, 55–95 µm long, 3–4 µm at the base, and 3–6 µm at the apex, projecting outside of the hymenium, septate, without encrustation, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water.

      Spores – Basidiospores subtriangular to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) (half also globose to oblong-ellipsoid) in frontal, and ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in lateral face, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, slightly thick-walled, aculeate, aculei usually isolated, up to 2 µm long, (4.4–)5.4–8.5(–9.2) × (3.6–)4.5–7.5(–8.1) µm, L = 6.64 µm, W = 5.81 µm, Q = 1.02–1.31 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Yunnan Province, Yuxi City, Xinping Autonomous County, Gasa Town, GPS coordinates 21°57′11″ N, 100°45′42″ E, altitude 2,300 m, dead branch of living tree, 6 August, 2023, Yuan 17424 (IFP 020082, GenBank ITS: PV843169; SSU: PV856510).

      Notes – In this study (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora longicystidiata is grouped within T. albomarginata, T. castanea, and T. sublilacina. They share common characteristics: the adherent basidiomata and smooth hymenophoral surface[43,142,155]. T. longicystidiata is similar to T. albomarginata sharing irregular basidiospores, and clavate basidia. However, T. albomarginata differs from T. longicystidiata by its longer basidia (40–60 µm), larger basidiospores (7–9.5 µm across), and the absences of cystidia[142]. T. longicystidiata resembles T. sublilacina in having sinuous basidia. However, T. sublilacina differs from T. longicystidiata by its echinulate basidiospores, utriform basidia, and wider subhymenophoral hyphae[43].

      Thelephora microcarpa Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 52,53

      Fungal Names number: FN 572448

      Figure 52. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora microcarpa (paratype IFP 020055). Photo by Yu-Rong Liang.

      Figure 53. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora microcarpa (drawn from the holotype IFP 020054). (a) Hyphae from pileal context. (b) Section of hymenium and subhymenium. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora microcarpa is characterized by the dark violet basidiomata, clavate to coralloid pileus, white pileal margin, and utriform to subcylindrical basidia.

      Etymology – Microcarpa (Lat.): referring to the small basidiomata.

      Type – China, Hunan Province, Huitong County, Huitong Ecological Station, GPS coordinates 26°48′ N, 109°30′ E, altitude 500 m, growing in soil under Acacia auriculiformis trees, 1 October, 2021, Yuan 16658 (holotype: IFP 020054, GenBank ITS: PQ656855; LSU: PQ803813; SSU: PV257943; mtSSU: PV440377).

      Description Basidiomata upright, solitary to concrescent, small-sized, up to 1 cm high, and 1.5 cm wide, coriaceous when fresh, taste mild, almost no odor when dried. Pileus clavate to coralliform, coralloid, usually with multiple pilei arising from a central stipe, margin slightly thin (0.1 mm), irregularly lobed to wavy. Abhymenial surface somewhat wrinkled, zonate, dark violet (18F2) near the center then greyish violet (18C4) gradually towards margin, violet white (18A2) to white (A1) at the margin. Hymenophoral surface concolorous or deeper. Stipe short and central, up to 0.5 cm long, brown, glabrous, clavillose to flatted or broadened.

      Hyphal structure Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae commonly clamp connections and simple-septa, CB+, IKI–, tissues turned black in KOH.

      Pileus Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, moderately branched, sometimes flexuous and collapsed, subparallel to loosely interwoven, 3–6 μm diam.

      Subhymenium Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, frequently branched often near the clamp connections, distinctly inflated, loosely interwoven, up to 3–8 μm diam.

      Basidia Utriform to subcylindrical, thin- to slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), with a clamp connection at the base, 45–60 × 9–15 μm, four sterigmata, sterigmata 3–7 μm long, and 1.5–3 μm diam at base, CB+, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia Absent.

      Spores Basidiospores globose to subglobose (irregularly lobed) in frontal view and subglobose to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in lateral view, yellowish brown to pale green in KOH, and in distilled water, slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, sometimes in groups of two or more, (5.5–)6–7.5(–8) × (4.2–)5–6.5(–7) μm, L = 6.93 μm, W = 5.81 μm, Q = 1.15–1.19 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Guangdong Province, Guangzhou city, Huangpu District, Meihua Ridge, GPS coordinates 23°11′19″ N, 113°28′5″ E, altitude 212 m, ground in sand under mixed forest, 26 May, 2024, Yuan 19344 (IFP 020055, GenBank ITS: PQ656856; LSU: PQ803814).

      Notes – With reference to the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora microcarpa is grouped into Thelephora, and is clustered with T. pinnatifida. T. microcarpa resembles T. pinnatifida in having clavarioid to coralloid pileus. However, T. pinnatifida can be distinguished from T. microcarpa by its longer basidia (47–90 × 10–11.5 µm), and larger basidiospores ([5.5–]6–9.5 × 5–8.5 µm)[97]. T. microcarpa is similar to T. dactyliophora and T. pinnatifida in having clavarioid to coralloid pileus and white margin[97]. However, T. dactyliophora differs from T. macrocarpa by its brownish gray to gray abhymenial surface, narrower basidia (6–9 μm), and basidiospores (4–6.5 μm)[97]. T. pinnatifida can be distinguished from T. macrocarpa in its brownish orange to brown surface, longer stipe (up to 15 mm), and longer basidia (47–90 μm)[97].

      Thelephora nanyigouensis Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 54,55

      Fungal Names number: FN 572451

      Figure 54. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora nanyigouensis (holotype IFP 020060).

      Figure 55. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora nanyigouensis (drawn from the holotype IFP 020060). (a) Section through basidiomata. (b) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora nanyigouensis is characterized by the greyish brown to reddish brown hymenophoral surface, utriform basidia (sometimes with sharp head), and aculeate basidiospores (aculei up to 2.5 µm).

      Etymology – Nanyigouensis (Lat.): referring to the locality (Nanyigou Nature Reserve) of the type.

      Type – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Milin County, Nanyigou Nature Reserve, GPS coordinates 29°7′41″ N, 94°12′52″ E, altitude 2,500 m, on fallen branch of Abies sp., 22 October, 2021, Yuan 16222 (holotype: IFP 020060, GenBank ITS: PQ656813; LSU: PV257902; SSU: PV257946).

      Description Basidiomata annual, resupinate, separable from the substrate, mucedinoid, without odor or taste when fresh, 0.5–1 mm thick, continuous. Hymenophoral surface smooth, greyish brown to reddish brown (9D3–9E4), and concolorous with the subiculum. Sterile margin often determinate, arachnoid, concolorous with hymenophore.

      Rhizomorphs Absent.

      Subicular Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connecitons and rarely simple-septa, thick-walled, occasionally branched, 5–7 µm diameter, without encrustation, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium Generative hyphae with clamp connecitons and rarely simple-septa, thin-walled, frequently branched, 3–6 µm diameter, without encrustation, hyphal cells short, pale in KOH, and in distilled water, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia 20–45 µm long, and 4–9 µm diameter at apex, 4.5–5.5 µm at base, with a clamp connection at the base, utriform sometimes with sharp head, not stalked, sinuous, without transverse septa, pale brown in KOH and distilled water, four sterigmata, sterigmata 3–5 µm long, and 1.5–2 µm diameter at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia Absent.

      Spores Basidiospores subglobose to globose in frontal and lateral face, pale brown in KOH, and distilled water, slightly thick-walled, aculeate, aculei usually isolated, up to 2.5 µm long, (9.4–)10.1–12(–12.7) × (9.1–)9.6–11.1(–12.1) µm, L = 10.98 µm, W = 10.2 µm, Q = 1.02–1.19 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Milin County, Nanyigou Nature Reserve, GPS coordinates 29°7′41″ N, 94°12′52″ E, altitude 2,500 m, on fallen branch of Picea sp., 22 October, 2021, Yuan 16162 (IFP 020061, GenBank ITS: PQ656812; LSU: PV257901; SSU: PV257945; SSU: PV440379).

      Notes – Based on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora nanyigouensis is grouped into Thelephora, and is clustered with T. longiechinula, T. cinereoumbrina, and T. badia. Their common features are the grayish brown to dark brown hymenophoral surface, utriform basidia, and the absence of rhizomorphs and cystidia. However, T. nanyigouensis differs from T. badia, T. cinereoumbrina, and T. longiechinula by the clamped hyphae[37,43]. T. badia is differentiated from T. nanyigouensis by its shorter basidiospores (8–11 µm) with shorter echinuli (1–1.5 µm)[43]. T. cinereoumbrina differs from T. nanyigouensis by the crustose basidiomata[37].

      Thelephora nigromarginata Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 56,57

      Fungal Names number: FN 572912

      Figure 56. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora nigromarginata (holotype IFP 020083).

      Figure 57. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora nigromarginata (drawn from the holotype IFP 020083). (a) Hyphae from pileal context. (b) Section of hymenium and subhymenium. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora nigromarginata is characterized by the brownish to dark brown basidiomata, white to black pileal margin, rugulose or wrinkled abhymenial surface, and subtriangular to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) basidiospores.

      Etymology – Nigromarginata (Lat.): referring to the black pileus margin.

      Type – China, Chongqing City, Jiangjin District, GPS coordinates 29°17′24″ N, 106°15′00″ E, altitude 500 m, ground in bamboo groves, 27 June, 2024, Yuan 19458 (holotype: IFP 020083, GenBank ITS: PQ656847; LSU: PQ803806; SSU: PV856507; mtSSU: PV856549).

      Description – Basidiomata upright, solitary to concrescent, small to medium-sized, up to 6 cm high, and 2–3 cm wide, coriaceous when fresh, hard, and light in weight when dried, taste mild, faint odor when dry. Pileus coralloid, usually with multiple branches arising from a central common stipe or base, branch multiple ranks, flat, finger-like to narrow flabelliform, margin thin (0.1–0.2 mm), deeply lacerate. Abhymenial surface slightly rugulose or wrinkled, non-zonate, brownish to dark brown (6E5–6F1), but chalky white (1A1) to black at the margin. Hymenophoral surface concolorous with abhymenial surface, rugulose, and non-zonate. Stipe central, up to 1 cm long, brown to brownish gray (6E5–6F2), irregularly cylindrical to flatted or broadened at base, surface smooth to slightly rugose.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae commonly with clamp connections, and rarely simple-septa, CB+, IKI–, tissues turned brown in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, occasionally branched, subparallel to loosely interwoven, without covered by dense crystals, 3–5 μm diam.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, hyaline, occasionally branched, loosely interwoven, up to 3–4.5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Utriform to clavate, thin- to slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), with a clamp connection at the base, multi-guttulate content sometimes very dense, 60–80 × 8–12 μm, four sterigmata, sterigmata 4–6 μm long, and 1.5–2.5 μm diam at base, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores subtriangular to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in frontal face, and ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in lateral face, brown in KOH, and in distilled water, thick-walled (< 1 μm), tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, sometimes in groups of two or more, (6.2–)7–8.2(–9) × (4.9–)5.9–7.5(–8.1) μm, L = 7.63 μm, W = 6.63 μm, Q = 1.01–1.5 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratypes) – China, Guizhou Province, Zunyi City, Xinpu New District, GPS coordinates 27°43′31″ N, 107°1′36″ E, altitude 900 m, ground in broad-leaved forest, 22 March, 2024, Yuan 19353 (IFP 020084, GenBank ITS: PQ656844; LSU: PQ803804; SSU: PV856508; mtSSU: PV856550); Hunan Province, Shaoyang City, Longhui County, GPS coordinates 27°7′12″ N, 110°58′12″ E, altitude 500 m, ground in Quercus spp. forest, 5 June, 2024, Yuan 19359 (IFP 020085, GenBank ITS: PQ656845; LSU: PQ803805; SSU: PV856509; mtSSU: PV856551).

      Notes – In the present study (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora nigromarginata, together with T. fasciculata, T. macrospora, T. palmata, T. regularis, and T. yunnanensis clustered in a clade with strong support. Morphologically, a special characteristic of T. nigromarginata is the black abhymenial surface margin when mature, which makes it distinct from other species in the genus. Furthermore, T. nigromarginata resembles T. fasciculata in having solitary to concrescent basidiomata, absence of cystidia, same diameter of context hyphae, and tuberculate basidiospores. However, T. fasciculata differs from T. nigromarginata by infundibuliform to ligulate pilei and larger basidiospores. T. nigromarginata and T. macrospora share some common features, including the upright basidiomata, similar size of basidia, and brown pilei surface. However, T. macrospora can be delimited from T. nigromarginata by its echinulate basidiospores and present of cystidia[13].

      Sequence alignment analysis indicated that the ITS sequence of this species shared high similarity with the corresponding sequence in the NCBI database, almostly no nucleotide difference identified between them[156,157]. These sequences were obtained from a sample collected in Yunnan Province, China, representing a new distribution site of this species in China.

      Thelephora scopiformis Y.Q. Zhu, L.J. Zhou & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 58,59

      Fungal Names number: FN 572913

      Figure 58. 

      Basidiomata of Thelephora scopiformis (holotype IFP 020086).

      Figure 59. 

      Microscopic structures of Thelephora scopiformis (drawn from the holotype IFP 020086). (a) Hyphae from pileal context. (b) Section of hymenium and subhymenium. (c) Basidiospores in frontal and lateral view.

      Diagnosis – Thelephora scopiformis is characterized by the branch with tips needle-like, chalky white or black pileal margin, utriform to subcylindrical basidia, and pyriform to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) basidiospores.

      Etymology – Scopiformis (Lat.): referring to the scopiform basidiomata.

      Type – China, Hunan Province, Shaoyang City, Xinning County, Huilongsi Town, GPS coordinates 26°34′48″ N, 111°4′48″ E, altitude 500 m, ground in mixed forest, 5 June, 2024, Yuan 19364 (holotype: IFP 020086, GenBank ITS: PQ656860; LSU: PQ803801; SSU: PV856504; mtSSU: PV856548).

      Description – Basidiomata 35–65 mm high, 15–50 mm wide, gregarious to caespitose, humid, and leathery when fresh, corky to hard and brittle when dry, faint odor when dry. Pileus coralloid, usually with multiple pilei arising from a shared stipe or center, and arranged in coralloid shape, branch clavate to pinnatifid or ramiform with tips needle-like. Abhymenial face sulcate, non-zonate, visibly ribbed, brownish (7E5) to black, but chalky white (1A1) or black at margin, margin 0.1–0.5 mm thick, deeply lacerate, velvety. Hymenophoral surface concolorous with abhymenial surface, rugulose, and non-zonate. Stipe central, 10–15 × 10–20 mm, irregularly cylindrical to flatted or broadened at base, surface smooth to slightly rugose, brownish gray (6F3).

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae commonly with clamp connections and rarely simple-septa, CB+, IKI–, tissues turned brown-black in KOH.

      Pileus – Generative hyphae thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, rarely branched, 3–5 μm diam.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), hyaline, rarely branched, sometimes inflated, loosely interwoven, up to 2–3.5 μm diam.

      Basidia – Utriform to subcylindrical, thin- to slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), with a clamp connection at the base, occasionally covered by dense crystals, occasionally with septate, 15–40 × 4–7 μm, four sterigmata, sterigmata 4–5.5 μm long, and 1–2 μm at base, CB+, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in frontal face, and pyriform to ellipsoid (irregularly lobed) in lateral face, pale brown in KOH, and in distilled water, slightly thick-walled (< 1 μm), tuberculate, tuberculi usually isolated, sometimes in groups of two or more, (5–)5.4–7.6(–7.9) × (4.8–)5–6.7(–7) μm, L = 6.46 μm, W = 5.67 μm, Q = 1.15–1.25 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratypes) – China, Chongqing City, Yubei District, GPS coordinates 29°36′23″ N, 106°34′19″ E, altitude 290 m, ground in Pinus spp. forest, 15 June, 2024, Yuan 19430 (IFP 020087, GenBank ITS: PQ656863; LSU: PQ803802; SSU: PV856505); Sichuan Province, Guangan City, Linshui County, Chengbei Town, GPS coordinates 30°21′00″ N, 106°55′48″ E, altitude 400 m, ground in mixed forest, 25 June, 2024, Yuan 19460 (IFP 020088, GenBank ITS: PQ656866; LSU: PQ803803; SSU: PV856506).

      Notes – In the present study (Fig. 6), the new species Thelephora scopiformis closely relates to T. anthocephala and T. scissilis. Morphologically, T. scopiformis shares similar features with T. anthocephala by the white abhymenial margin and gregarious basidiomata. Nevertheless, T. anthocephala can be differentiated by its subinfundibuliform branches, ferruginous to fuscous ferruginous or purplish abhymenial face, and smooth hymenophoral surface[145]. T. scopiformis and T. scissilis share common features including the gregarious basidiomata and glabrous stipes. However, the diagnostic feature to distinguish the new species is the smooth hymenophoral surface, castaneous stipes, and larger basidiospores[145].

      Hymenochaetales Oberw.

      Hymenochaetaceae Donk

      Index Fungorum number: IF 536196

      Type genus – Hymenochaete Lév.

      Hymenochaete Lév.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 17816

      Type species – Hymenochaete rubiginosa (Dicks.) Lév.

      Note – Hymenochaete Lév. was erected in 1846, with Hym. rubiginosa (Dicks.) Lév. designated as the type species. Patouillard[158] systematically organized the Hymenochaete and proposed classification criteria based on the setae, spore morphology and hyphal system. Subsequently, Burt[159], Cunningham[160], Escobar[161], and Léger[162] subdivided the Hymenochaete into four groups or sections—Hymenochaete, Fultochaete, Gymnochaete, and Paragymnochaete—based on the presence or absence of different layers in the context of the basidiomata. Parmasto[163] conducted a cladistic analysis of all Hymenochaete species using macro-morphological and micro-morphological characters. In the comprehensive survey of Hymenochaetales, Larsson et al.[164] provided support for a monophyletic Hymenochaetaceae clade. The family Hymenochaetaceae comprises poroid and non-poroid morphological groups. In recent years, scholars have systematically compiled and taxonomically revised the global diversity of these two groups for the first time[31,165]. In the present study, based on the ITS and nLSU data (Fig. 7), the genus Hymenochaete nested in Hymenochaetaceae, in which one new species Hymenochaete baishanzuensis is reported.

      Hymenochaete baishanzuensis L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 60,61

      Fungal Names number: FN 572424

      Figure 60. 

      Basidiomata of Hymenochaete baishanzuensis (holotype IFP 020012).

      Figure 61. 

      Microscopic structures of Hymenochaete baishanzuensis (drawn from the holotype IFP 020012). (a) Section of hymenium. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Hyphidia. (e) Setae.

      Diagnosis – Hymenochaete baishanzuensis is characterized by the smooth to tuberculate hymenophoral surface, hyphidia with an obtuse apex and constricted, reniform to ellipsoid spores.

      Etymology – Baishanzuensis (Lat.): referring to the locality of the type.

      Type – China, Zhejiang Province, Lishui City, Baishanzu National Nature Reserve, GPS coordinates 27°45′11″ N, 119°11′20″ E, altitude 1,515 m, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 18 July, 2023, Wei 11406 (holotype: IFP 020012, GenBank ITS: PV883104).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adnate, uneasily separable, coriaceous and corky when fresh, hard brittle when dry, without odor, up to 1 mm thick, hymenophoral surface smooth to tuberculate, yellowish brown (5D4–5F8) to brown (6D4–7F8) when fresh, no significant change after drying. Sterile margin indistinct.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae simple-septa, thin- to thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Subiculum – Generative hyphae thick-walled, smooth, dark yellow, moderately branched, parallel interwoven, 7–13 µm in diam, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, dark yellow, frequently branched, more or less flexous, interwoven, 2–4 µm in diam, CB+, IKI–.

      Hyphidia – Thick-walled, smooth, colorless, simple-septate, with an obtuse apex and constricted, moderately, 9–20 × 2–3 µm, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Setae – Subulate, thick-walled, smooth, ferruginous, straight, with a sharp apex, frequently, 25–90 × 7–12 µm, arising from the subhymenium, extending through hymenium, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, with four sterigmata, and a simple-septa at the base, sterigmata up to 7 µm, slightly constricted at the base, more or less flexous, 15–20 × 3–4 µm, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Absent.

      Spores – Basidiospores reniform to ellipsoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, 3.5–4 × 2–3 µm, L = 4.0 µm, W = 2.54 µm, Q = 1.33–2 (n = 60/2), CB–, IKI–.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Zhejiang Province, Lishui City, Baishanzu National Nature Reserve, GPS coordinates 27°45′11″ N, 119°11′20″ E, altitude 1,515 m, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 18 July, 2023, Wei 11432 (IFP 020013, GenBank ITS: PV883105).

      Notes – The new species Hymenochaete baishanzuensis is classified within Hymenochaete (Fig. 7), and forms a clade with Hym. megaspora. Hym. baishanzuensis resembles Hym. megaspore by sharing smooth to tuberculate hymenophoral surfaces, similar texture of basidiomata and hyphidia width (2–3 µm). However, Hym. megaspora differs from Hym. baishanzuensis by its larger setae ([80–]90–120[–140] × 8–13[–14] µm), basidia (25–32 × 5–8 µm) and baidiospores ([7–]7.5–10[–11] × 5–7 µm)[89]. Hym. baishanzuensis is similar to Hym. bambusicola, and Hym. colliculosa in having brown hymenophore surface[166]. However, Hym. bambusicola differs from Hym. baishanzuensis by its smooth hymenophore surface, dimitic hyphal system, and longer basidiospores (4.5–6 µm)[166]. Hym. colliculosa can be distinguished from Hym. baishanzuensis in its thicker basidiomata (500 µm), larger basidia (20–24 × 5–6 µm), and basidiospores (5–7 × 3.5–5 µm)[166].

      Peniophorellaceae L.W. Zhou, X.Wei Wang & S.L. Liu

      Index Fungorum number: IF 900252

      Type genus – Peniophorella P. Karst.

      Peniophorella P. Karst.

      Index Fungorum number: IF 18202

      Type species – Peniophorella pubera (Fr.) P. Karst.

      Note – Peniophorella, typified by Peniophorella pubera, was first described as a monotypic genus by Karsten[167]. With the advancement of molecular systematics, Larsson[168] reinstated the generic independence of Peniophorella from Hyphoderma within the Hymenochaetales. Justo et al.[169] revised the family-level classification of Polyporales (Basidiomycota), and suggested that Peniophorella —accommodating 20 species—should be placed in the family Hyphodermataceae (Hymenochaetales). To date, the number of known species in Peniophorella has increased to approximately 30[170]. However, the familial placement of Peniophorella within Hymenochaetales remains controversial: while some studies have assigned it to Rickenellaceae[28,171], its definitive family-level taxonomic position requires further clarification through more extensive phylogenetic analyses, which extends beyond the scope of the current study. In the present study, Pe. alba is described based on phylogenetic analyses of ITS, nLSU, and nSSU data (Fig. 8).

      Peniophorella alba L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 62,63

      Fungal Names number: FN 572425

      Figure 62. 

      Basidiomata of Peniophorella alba (holotype IFP 020014).

      Figure 63. 

      Microscopic structures of Peniophorella alba (drawn from the holotype IFP 020014). (a) Section of hymenium. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Cystidia.

      Diagnosis – Peniophorella alba is characterized by the smooth hymenophoral surface, vertical subicular hyphae at the branches, cystidia with a sharp apex, and reniform to subcylindrical spores.

      Etymology – Alba (Lat.): referring to the white basidiomata.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Lincang City, Wulaoshan National Forest Park, GPS coordinates 23°54′49″ N, 100°10′55″ E, altitude 2,400 m, on dead branch of angiosperm tree, 9 August, 2023, Yuan 17692 (holotype: IFP 020014, GenBank ITS: PV883103).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, ceraceous, adnate, uneasily separable, soft leather when fresh, hard brittle when dry, without odor, 50–100 µm thick. Hymenophoral surface smooth, white (–A1) when fresh, later unchanged. Sterile margin indistinct.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin- to thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Subiculum – Generative subicular hyphae thick-walled, smooth, colorless, vertical at the branches, frequently, more or less flexous, parallel interwoven, 3–5 µm in diam, CB+, IKI–.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae thin-walled, smooth, colorless, frequently branched, more or less flexous, interwoven, 2–3 µm in diam, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia – Clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, 4 sterigmata, sterigmata up to 5 µm, with a clamp connection and constriction at the base, more or less flexous, 17–27 × 5–8 µm, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Cystidia – Thick-walled, smooth, colorless, with a clamp connection and constriction at the base, with a sharp apex, inflated near the bottom, frequently, 27–98 × 7–13 µm, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Spores – Basidiospores reniform to subcylindrical, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, (6–)7–8(–9) × 3–4 µm, L = 7.60 µm, W = 3.20 µm, Q = 2–2.67 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – Peniophorella alba is grouped into Peniophorella based on the phylogenetic tree (Fig. 8), and is revealed as a sister to Pe. subpraetermissa. They exhibit some similar characteristics: white to milk white hymenophoral surface, and similar thick basidiomata (50–120 µm)[172]. However, Pe. alba can be delimited from Pe. subpraetermissa by its wider subicular hyphae (4–7 µm), and subymenial hyphae (2–6 µm). Peniophorella alba differs from Pe. subpraetermissa due to its smaller basidia (20–35 × 6–8µm)[172]. Pe. alba is similar to Pe. aspersa and Pe. crystallifera in having white hymenophore surface[170]. However, Pe. aspersa differs from Pe. alba by its warted hymenophore surface, presence of hyphidia, stephanocysts, and leptocystidia[170]. Pe. crystallifera can be distinguished from Pe. alba in its grandinioid hymenophore surface, and presence of heavily encrusted cystidia[170].

      Schizoporaceae Jülich

      Index Fungorum number: IF 80038

      Type genus – Schizopora Velen.

      Lyomyces P. Karst.

      Index Fungorum number: IF18000

      Type species – Lyomyces sambuci (Pers.) P. Karst.

      Note – The genus Lyomyces is an important group of corticioid fungi within the Schizoporaceae (Hymenochaetales), and it was first established by Karsten[133] with Lyomyces sambuci designated as the type species. Members of the genus are representative white-rot fungi among corticioid fungi. Their basidiomata are typically white to cream, thin, resupinate to effused, and adherent to the substrate. The hymenophoral surface is smooth to slightly farinaceous, and the texture is delicate, and easily overlooked in the field. Due to the lack of molecular data, it has been difficult to delimit closely related genera within Schizoporaceae; therefore, Hyphodontia s. l. has been widely adopted[173,174]. Within Hyphodontia s. l., Lyomyces is nested in the XylodonLyomycesRogersella clade, one of the six major lineages recognized in Hyphodontia s.l.[175]. Subsequent taxonomic revisions by Riebesehl & Langer[176] refined this framework and demonstrated that Hyphodontia s.l. should be segregated into six distinct genera: Hastodontia, Hyphodontia, Kneiffiella, Lagarobasidium, Lyomyces, and Xylodon. In the present study, based on combined analyses of ITS and nLSU sequences data (Fig. 9), a new species is described—Lyomyces membranaceus.

      Lyomyces membranaceus L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 64,65

      Fungal Names number: FN 573099

      Figure 64. 

      Basidiomata of Lyomyces membranaceus (holotype IFP 020089).

      Figure 65. 

      Microscopic structures of Lyomyces membranaceus (drawn from the holotype IFP 020089). (a) Section of hymenium. (b) Basidia and basidioles. (c) Basidiospores.

      Diagnosis – Lyomyces membranaceus is characterized by the smooth hymenophoral surface, subfusiform to subcylindrical cystidia and ellipsoid to subglobose basidiospores.

      Etymology – Membranaceus (Lat.): referring to having membranaceous basidiomata.

      Type – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Bomi County, Yigong Tea Farm, GPS coordinates 30°07'55" N, 95°01'05" E, altitude 2,160 m, on fallen angiosperm branch, 24 October, 2021, Yuan 16290 (Holotype IFP 020089, GenBank ITS: PV919702; LSU: PX518154).

      Description –Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adnate, membranaceous, adherent to the substrate and uneasy separable, up to 50–150 μm thick. Hymenophoral surface smooth, with cracked, white (–A1) to yellowish white (1A2–4A2) when dry. Sterile margin indistinct.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, slightly thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Subiculum – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, smooth, colorless, moderately branched, parallel interwoven, 2–3 μm diameter.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae slightly thick-walled, smooth, colorless, frequently branched, irregularly interwoven, 1–3 μm diameter.

      Cystidia – subfusiform to subcylindrical, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, slightly constricted at the end, sometimes flexuous, 17–30 × 3–5 µm, CB–, IKI–.

      Basidia – clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, four sterigmata, sterigmata up to 5 µm long, with a clamp connection at the base, sometimes flexuous, 20–27 × 3–4 µm, CB–, IKI–. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid to subglobose, thick-walled, smooth, colorless, (2.8–)3–4(–4.2) × (1.5–)1.7–2.8(–3.0) µm, L = 3.49 µm, W = 2.19 µm, Q = 1.28–2.0 (n = 60/2), CB+, IKI–. Chlamydospores and anamorpha absent.

      Material examined (paratype) – China, Xizang Autonomous Region, Linzhi City, Bayi District, Pailong Town, 30°03′ N, 95°00′ E, altitude 3,416 m, on dead bamboo, 23 October, 2021, Yuan 16272 (Holotype IFP 020090, GenBank ITS: PV919703).

      Notes – Based on the ITS + nLSU data (Fig. 9), the new species Lyomyces membranaceus is grouped with Lyomyces species, and is revealed as a sister to L. microfasciculatus. L. microfasciculatus can be distinguished from L. membranaceus by its warted to minutely odontioid hymenophoral surface, capitate cystidia and shorter basidia (14–15.5[–18.5] µm long)[175]. L. membranaceus resembles L. albopulverulentus, L. daweishanensis, and L. pantropicus in having a smooth hymenophoral surface. However, L. albopulverulentus distinguish from L. membranaceus in its longer capitate cystidia (37–54 × 5–9 µm), and wider basidia (7–9 µm wide)[177]. L. daweishanensis differs from L. membranaceus due to its two types cystidia (clavate or capitate), wider basidia (6.5–8.5 µm wide), and present of numerous crystals[178]. L. pantropicus differs from L. membranaceus by its four types cystidia, shorter basidia (16–17[–22] µm long), and oblong basidiospores[179].

      Xylodon (Pers.) Gray

      Index Fungorum number: IF 18771

      Type species – Xylodon quercinus (Pers.) Gray

      Note – The genus Xylodon was established by Gray in 1821, with Xylodon quercinus designated as its type species. Species of Xylodon were generally classified under Hyphodontia J. Erikss. It was not until Hjortstam & Ryvarden[180,181] reorganised Hyphodontia s.l. into different genera based on morphological features. Phylogenetic studies have demonstrated that Hyphodontia s.l. is a polyphyletic group, within which Xylodon and Kneiffiella P. Karst. contain the largest number of species[173,176,182]. Molecular systematic research has identified two major clades: the Xylodon-Lyomyces-Rogersella clade, and the Xylodon-Schizopora-Palifer clade, with species of Lyomyces, Palifer, Rogersella, Schizopora, and Xylodon intermingled within these clades[183]. The study included representative sequences and taxa of Hyphodontia s.l., such as Lyomyces, Palifer, Rogersella, Schizopora, and Xylodon. Notably, Riebesehl & Langer[176] found that distinguishing between Xylodon and Schizopora based on morphological and phylogenetic data was challenging, and thus suggested that Schizopora species should be merged into Xylodon. Additionally, the phylogenetic relationship between Xylodon species was clarified, with molecular data from the ITS and nLSU regions confirming that the genera Lagarobasidium and Xylodon are synonymous. In the present study, based on the ITS, nLSU, and nSSU data (Fig. 8), Xylodon is grouped with Lyomyces, Fasciodontia, Hyphodontia, and Kneiffiella. Furthermore, two new species—X. albus and X. bicystidiatus—are described.

      Xylodon albus L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 66,67

      Fungal Names number: FN 572427

      Figure 66. 

      Basidiomata of Xylodon albus (holotype IFP 020016).

      Figure 67. 

      Microscopic structures of Xylodon albus (drawn from the holotype IFP 020016). (a) Section of hymenium. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Cystidia.

      Diagnosis – Xylodon albus is characterized by the echinulate hymenophoral surface, narrowly clavate to clavate basidia, clavate to cylindrical cystidia, and ovoid to subglobose basidiospores.

      Etymology – Albus (Lat.): referring to the white basidiomata (when fresh).

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Lincang City, Wulaoshan National Forest Park, GPS coordinates 23°54′49″ N, 100°10′55″ E, altitude 2,400 m, on fallen trunk of Pinus sp., 9 August, 2023, Yuan 17677 (holotype: IFP 020016, GenBank ITS: PV883101).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, separable, no releasing a smell, coriaceous when fresh, hard brittle when dry, up to 10 cm long, 5 cm wide, 50–200 µm thick. Hymenophoral surface echinulate, white (–A1) when fresh, pale yellow (1A3–4A3) when drying. Sterile margin indistinct.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin- to thick-walled, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Subiculum – Generative hyphae thick-walled, smooth, colorless, frequently branched, vertical at the branched, parallel interwoven, more or less flexous, 2–8.5 µm in diam, CB+.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae thin-walled, smooth, colorless, frequently branched, more or less flexous, irregularly interwoven, 2–4 µm in diam., CB–.

      Cystidia – Clavate to cylindrical, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, with a blunt apex, with a clamp connection at the base, rarely, 33–53 × 3–5 µm.

      Basidia – Narrowly clavate to clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, four sterigmata, sterigmata up to 5 µm, with a clamp connection at the base and slightly constricted, more or less flexous, with oily content, 14–23 × 3–4 µm, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Spores – Basidiospores ovoid to subglobose, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, occasionally with oily content, 4–4.5(–5) × 3–3.5 µm, L = 4.10 µm, W = 3.02 µm, Q = 1.14–1.5 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – In this study, the new species Xylodon albus is clustered with X. acystidiatus and X. brevisetus without support (Fig. 8). X. albus resembles X. acystidiatus in its shared common color of basidiomata. However, X. acystidiatus can be distinguished from X. albus by its smooth hymenophoral surface, absence of cystidia, and larger basidia (20–25 × 4–4.5 µm)[29]. Xylodon albus shares similarities with X. brevisetus by echinulate hymenophoral surface and the same size of basidospores (4–5 × 3–3.5 µm). X. brevisetus can be delimited from X. albus by its torulose cystidia and larger basidia (20–25 × 4–5 µm)[184].

      Xylodon bicystidiatus L.J. Zhou, Y.Q. Zhu & H.S. Yuan, sp. nov. Figs 68,69

      Fungal Names number: FN 572428

      Figure 68. 

      Basidiomata of Xylodon bicystidiatus (holotype IFP 020017).

      Figure 69. 

      Microscopic structures of Xylodon bicystidiatus (drawn from the holotype IFP 020017). (a) Section of hymenium. (b) Basidiospores. (c) Basidia and basidioles. (d) Cystidia.

      Diagnosis – Xylodon bicystidiatus is characterized by the tuberculate to echinulate hymenophoral surface, ellipsoid to ovoid basidiospores, and two types cystidia.

      Etymology – Bicystidiatus (Lat.): referring to having two types of cystidia.

      Type – China, Yunnan Province, Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Shangri-La City, Potatso National Park, GPS coordinates 27°50′12″ N, 99°57′27″ E, altitude 3,655 m, on fallen trunk of Abies sp., 15 August, 2023, Yuan 18206 (holotype: IFP 020017, GenBank ITS: PV883100; LSU: PV257909; SSU: PV257948).

      Description – Basidiomata annual, resupinate, separable, soft leather when fresh, hard brittle, cracked when dry, without odor, up to 15 cm long, 2 cm wide, 250 µm thick. Hymenophoral surface tuberculate to echinulate, pale yellow (1A3–4A3) to light yellow (1A4–4A5) when fresh, greyish yellow (2B3–3B7) when drying. Sterile margin indistinct.

      Hyphal structure – Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae with clamp connections, thin- to thick-walled, CB+, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Subiculum – Generative hyphae thick-walled, smooth, colorless, sparsely branched, parallel interwoven, 2–2.5 µm in diam.

      Subhymenium – Generative hyphae thin- to slightly thick-walled, smooth, colorless, moderately branched, more or less flexous, interwoven, irregular crystals, 2–3.5 µm in diam.

      Cystidia – Two types: (1) capitate cystidia, with a clamp connection at the base, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, slightly constricted at the neck, with a globose head, moderately of occurrence, 14–24 × 3–4 µm; (2) tapered cystidia, with a clamp connection at the base, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, subulate with a blunt apex, moderately of occurrence, 17.5–29 × 3–4 µm, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH.

      Basidia – Narrowly clavate to clavate, thin-walled, smooth, colorless, four sterigmata, sterigmata up to 6 µm, with a clamp connection at the base and slightly constricted, or with oily content, 19–32 × 3–5 µm, CB–, IKI–, tissues unchanged in KOH. Basidioles similar to basidia.

      Spores – Basidiospores ellipsoid to ovoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, (4–)4.5–5(–5.5) × 3–4 µm, L = 4.92 µm, W = 3.52 µm, Q = 1.25–1.67 (n = 30/1), CB–, IKI–.

      Notes – The new species Xylodon bicystidiatus is classified within Xylodon (Fig. 8) and forms a clade with X. attenuates. X. bicystidiatus resembles X. attenuates by sharing cystidia and basidiospores of similar size[185]. However, X. attenuates can be distinguished from X. bicystidiatus by smaller basidia ([12.2–]13.0–18.1[–20] × [3.1–]3.2–4.6[–4.9] μm), wider subymenial hyphae (2.4–4.6 µm), and subicular hyphae (2.7–4.6 µm). X. bicystidiatus is similar to X. luteodontioides and X. wumengshanensis in having yellow hymenophoral surface[186]. However, X. luteodontioides differs from X. bicystidiatus by its presence of schizopapillate cystidia, and larger basidiospores (3.5–4.5 × 2.5–3.5 µm)[186]. X. wumengshanensis can be distinguished from X. bicystidiatus by its presence of fusoid cystidia and larger basidiospores ([4.5–] 5–6.5[–7] × 4–5.5 µm)[186].

      Key to species of Hydnellum from China.
      1 Basidiospores hyaline 2
      1 Basidiospores brown 12
      2 Basidia clavate or sinuous 3
      2 Basidia clavate 4
      3 Pileus round to circular Hydnellum liantaishanense
      3 Pileus flabelliform to subcircular Hydnellum tomentosum
      4 Generative hyphae with mostly simple-septa, occasionally clamped 5
      4 Generative hyphae with simple-septa 7
      5 Stipe central 6
      5 Stipe central to lateral Hydnellum melanocarpum
      6 Pileus infundibuliform Hydnellum concentricum
      6 Pileus irregularly flabelliform Hydnellum hydrangeoides
      7 Stipe central 8
      7 Stipe lateral 10
      8 Pileal margin white Hydnellum testaceum
      8 Pileal margin not white 9
      9 Taste mild Hydnellum infundibuliforme
      9 Taste bitter Hydnellum carnosum
      10 Basidiospores subglobose to ellipsoidal 11
      10 Basidiospores subglobose to globose Hydnellum chocolatum
      11 Pilieal surface smooth Hydnellum crassipileatum
      11 Pilieal surface fibrillose Hydnellum radiatum
      12 Generative hyphae with simple-septa 16
      12 Generative hyphae not with simple-septa 13
      13 Basidiomata fleshy Hydnellum versipelle
      13 Basidiomata woody 14
      14 Stipe central 15
      14 Stipe lateral Hydnellum atrospinosum
      15 Pilieal surface glabrous Hydnellum diabolus
      15 Pilieal surface velutinous to tomentose Hydnellum suaveolens
      16 Generative hyphae only with simple-septa 20
      16 Generative hyphae mostly with simple-septa, occasionally clamped 17
      17 Stipe surface glabrous Hydnellum cinnamomea
      17 Stipe surface not glabrous 18
      18 Stipe surface plushy Hydnellum caeruleum
      18 Stipe surface tomentose 19
      19 Taste mild Hydnellum fibulatum
      19 Taste acrid Hydnellum peckii
      20 Pileal surface scaled 21
      20 Pileal surface not scaled 28
      21 Taste none 22
      21 Taste like something 24
      22 Pileus depressed Hydnellum subscabrosellum
      22 Pileus planar 23
      23 Pileus circular Hydnellum subailaoensis
      23 Pileus ellipsoid to round Hydnellum grosselepidotum
      24 Taste mild Hydnellum edulium
      24 Taste bitter 25
      25 Pileal margin white Hydnellum fagiscabrosum
      25 Pileal margin not white 26
      26 Spines up to 5 mm long 27
      26 Spines up to 1 mm long Hydnellum lidongensis
      27 Pileus planar to plano-convex Hydnellum illudens
      27 Pileus depressed Hydnellum glaucopus
      28 Stipe lateral 29
      28 Stipe central or central to lateral 30
      29 Pileal margin incurved, occasionally incised Hydnellum ailaoense
      29 Pileal margin lobed Hydnellum sulcatum
      30 Stipe central 31
      30 Stipe central to lateral 39
      31 Pilieal surface glabrous 32
      31 Pilieal surface not glabrous 34
      32 Stipe surface tomentose to matted 33
      32 Stipe surface spongy Hydnellum succulentus
      33 Pilieal surface azonate Hydnellum coactum
      33 Pilieal surface zonate Hydnellum ferrugineum
      34 Pilieal surface azonate 35
      34 Pilieal surface zonate 36
      35 Taste bitter Hydnellum atrorubrum
      35 Taste none Hydnellum porphyreum
      36 Taste disagreeable 37
      36 Taste none 38
      37 Spines up to 5 mm Hydnellum aurantiacum
      37 Spines up to 9 mm Hydnellum pineticola
      38 Stipe surface subtomentose to matted Hydnellum chrysinum
      38 Stipe surface glabrous Hydnellum tarda
      39 Pileal margin white 44
      39 Pileal margin not white 40
      40 Taste none 41
      40 Taste bitter 42
      41 Basidiospores irregularly Hydnellum martioflavum
      41 Basidiospores subglobose Hydnellum earlianum
      42 Stipe rugose 43
      42 Stipe velutinous to matted Hydnellum spongiosipes
      43 Spines up to 4 mm Hydnellum inflatum
      43 Spines up to 2 mm Hydnellum granulosum
      44 Basidiospores subglobose to globose 45
      44 Basidiospores irregular 46
      45 Spines up to 2 mm Hydnellum xanthopus
      45 Spines up to 4 mm Hydnellum nitida
      46 Basidiomata fleshy Hydnellum subalpinum
      46 Basidiomata woody 47
      47 Stipe surface tomentose 49
      47 Stipe surface not tomentose 48
      48 Taste acrid Hydnellum bomiense
      48 Taste none Hydnellum qinghaiense
      49 Taste none Hydnellum squamulosum
      49 Taste mild 50
      50 Pileal margin lobed 51
      50 Pileal margin eroded Hydnellum yunnanense
      51 Pileus infundibuliform to flabelliform Hydnellum brunneorubrum
      51 Pileus depressed to flabelliform or irregularly circular Hydnellum rubidofuscum

      Key to resupinate species of Thelephora from China.
      1 Rhizomorphs present 2
      1 Basidiomata absent 29
      2 Rhizomorphs differentiated (with a distinct central core and outer layer) 3
      2 Rhizomorphs undifferentiated (uniform structure) 8
      3 Rhizomorphs dimitic 4
      3 Rhizomorphs monomitic 5
      4 Rhizomorphs type G; central hyphae usually simple septate Thelephora dimidiata
      4 Rhizomorphs type G; central hyphae clamped Thelephora incrustata
      5 Cystidia present 6
      5 Cystidia absent 7
      6 Spores aculeate (up to 2 5 µm long) Thelephora cystidiata
      6 Spores echinulate to aculeate (up to 1 5 µm long) Thelephora citrinocystidiata
      7 Basidiomata arachnoid, continuous Thelephora qingyuanensis
      7 Basidiomata mucedinoid, discontinuous Thelephora brevis
      8 Rhizomorphs of type A 9
      8 Rhizomorphs of type B 11
      9 Rhizomorph hyphae thin-walled Thelephora tenuirhizomorpha
      9 Rhizomorph hyphae thick-walled 10
      10 Subicular hyphae thick-walled, 3.5–6.5 μm Thelephora fuscocrustosa
      10 Subicular hyphae slightly thick- to thick-walled Thelephora pallidomarginata
      11 Hyphal septation in rhizomorphs exclusively by simple-septa 12
      11 Hyphal septation in rhizomorphs with clamp connections (or both clamps and simple-septa) 14
      12 Rhizomorph hyphae ≥ 3 µm 13
      12 Rhizomorph hyphae < 3 µm Thelephora efibulata
      13 Subicular hyphae thick-walled, smooth, 3–5 μm Thelephora efibulis
      13 Subicular hyphae slightly thick walled, with encrustation, 4–8 µm Thelephora olivaceomarginata
      14 Rhizomorph hyphae with both clamp connections and simple-septa 15
      14 Rhizomorph hyphae possessing exclusively clamp connections 20
      15 Spores thick-walled 16
      15 Spores slightly thick-walled 17
      16 Basidiomata mucedinoid Thelephora angusta
      16 Basidiomata arachnoid Thelephora fuscoaraneosa
      17 Spores ≤ 7 µm Thelephora aureomarginata
      17 Spores > 7 µm 18
      18 Sterigmata > 5 µm Thelephora separata
      18 Sterigmata ≤ 5 µm 19
      19 Cystidia present Thelephora capitatocystidiata
      19 Cystidia absent Thelephora brunneoflava
      20 Basidiomata discontinuous 21
      20 Basidiomata continuous 22
      21 Basidia utriform, not stalked Thelephora linzhiensis
      21 Basidia clavate, stalked Thelephora interrupta
      22 Spores wall-thined Thelephora casiae
      22 Spores wall-thicked 23
      23 Subglobose to bi-, tri- or quadra-lobed 24
      23 Irregularly globose or lobed 25
      24 Spores echinulate, up to 1 μm long Thelephora flavidobadia
      24 Spores echinulate to aculeate, up to 2 µm long Thelephora guiyangensis
      25 Cystidia present Thelephora gloeocystidiata
      25 Cystidia absent 26
      26 Basidia not stalked Thelephora inconspicua
      26 Basidia stalked 27
      27 Rhizomorph ≥ 20 µm Thelephora fuscogranulosa
      27 Rhizomorph ≤ 20 µm 28
      28 Basidia not sinuous, Subhymenial frequently branched Thelephora olivacea
      28 Basidia sinuous, Subhymenial occasionally branched Thelephora parvispora
      29 Cystidia present Thelephora longicystidiata
      29 Cystidia absent 2
      30 Spore thin or thin- to slightly thick-walled 3
      30 Spore slightly thick-walled or thick-walled 5
      31 Spore thin-walled Thelephora rotundata
      31 Spore thin- to slightly thick-walled 4
      32 Hyphal septation with both simple-septa and clamp connections Thelephora coffeae
      32 Hyphal septation exclusively with clamp connections Thelephora globospora
      33 Spores slightly thick-walled 6
      33 Spores thick-walled 16
      34 Spore ornamentation ≥ 2 µm long 7
      34 Spore ornamentation < 2 µm long 11
      35 Spores > 10 µm long Thelephora nanyigouensis
      35 Spores ≤ 10 µm 8
      36 Basidia utriform 9
      36 Basidia clavate 10
      37 Spores with aculeate (isolated), basidia not sinuous Thelephora griseofusca
      37 Spores with echinulate (sometimes grouped in 2 or more), basidia sinuous Thelephora segregata
      38 Basidia stalked, sterigmata > 10 µm long, subicular hyphae with crystal Thelephora longiaculeifera
      38 Basidia not stalked, sterigmata < 10 µm long, subicular hyphae smooth Thelephora duplexa
      39 Spores > 7 µm Thelephora bomiensis
      39 Spores ≤ 7 µm 12
      40 Basidia utriform Thelephora schrenkiana
      40 Basidia clavate 13
      41 Basidiomata granulose 14
      41 Basidiomata smooth 15
      42 Sterigmata ≤ 5 µm long Thelephora griseocastanea
      42 Sterigmata > 5 µm long Thelephora olivaceobrunnea
      43 Spores > 6 long and > 5 µm wide Thelephora griseomarginata
      43 Spores ≤ 6 long and ≤ 5 µm wide Thelephora pallidocastanea
      44 Spore ornamentation wart-like (verrucose or nodulose) 17
      44 Spore ornamentation spine-like (echinulate or aculeate) 21
      45 Spore broadly ellipsoid Thelephora velutina
      45 Spore subglobose to globose 18
      46 Hyphal > 5 µm in diam 19
      46 Hyphal ≤ 5 µm in diam 20
      47 Basidiospores membranaceous Thelephora wumenshanensis
      47 Basidiospores farinaceous Thelephora tenuifarinacea
      48 Basidia clavate (< 50 µm long) Thelephora olivaceobasidiosa
      48 Basidia cylindrical to subclavate (> 50 µm long) Thelephora yunnanensis
      49 Basidia clavate 22
      49 Basidia utriform 25
      50 Basidiospores > 7 µm long, > 6 µm wide 23
      50 Basidiospores < 7 µm long, < 6 µm wide 24
      51 Basidiomata arachnoid, continuous; subicular hyphae frequently branched Thelephora asiae-orientalis
      51 Basidiomata mucedinoid, uncontinuous; subicular hyphae occasionally branched Thelephora aurimucida
      52 Subicular hyphae frequently branched
      > 5 μm; hymenophoral surface farinose
      Thelephora farinosa
      52 Subicular hyphae rarely branched
      ≤ 5 μm; hymenophoral surface granulose
      Thelephora storea
      53 Spore spine-like ornamentation > 1.5 µm long 26
      53 Spore spine-like ornamentation ≤ 1.5 µm long 34
      54 Spore echinuli usually isolated 27
      54 Spore echinuli usually isolated, sometimes grouped in two or more 29
      55 Spore echinuli subglobose to bi-lobed Thelephora longiechinuli
      55 Spore echinuli subglobose to globose 28
      56 Sterigmata > 10 μm long Thelephora conclusa
      56 Sterigmata < 10 μm long Thelephora atrocastanea
      57 Sterigmata > 6 μm long 30
      57 Sterigmata ≤ 6 μm long 32
      58 Subicular hyphae occasionally branched
      ≤ 5 μm
      Thelephora fuscopelliculosa
      58 Subicular hyphae frequently branched
      > 5 μm
      31
      59 Basidiomata dark blonde to yellowish brown Thelephora stipitata
      59 Basidiomata brownish grey to dark brown Thelephora brunneogrisea
      60 Hyphal ≤ 5 μm in diam Thelephora exiguelata
      60 Hyphal > 5 μm in diam 33
      61 Spore > 9 μm long > 8 μm wide Thelephora megaspora
      61 Spore < 9 μm long < 8 μm wide Thelephora pallidobrunnea
      62 Basidiomata granulose Thelephora fuscofarinosa
      62 Basidiomata smooth 35
      63 Subhymenial hyphae slightly thick-walled or thick-walled 36
      63 Subhymenial hyphae thin-walled 38
      64 Basidiomata crustose Thelephora atrobadia
      64 Basidiomata mucedinoid 37
      65 Subhymenial hyphae slightly thick-walled, occasionally branched > 5 μm Thelephora pertenuis
      65 Subhymenial hyphae thick-walled, frequently branched ≤ 5 μm Thelephora latihypha
      66 Spore globose or lobed 39
      66 Spore subglobose to globose 40
      67 Spore irregularly globose or lobed, aculeate, up to 1.5 μm long Thelephora liaoningensis
      67 Spore subglobose to bi-, tri-, or quadra-lobed, echinulate, up to 1 μm long Thelephora chayuensis
      68 Sterigmata > 5.5 μm Thelephora kanasensis
      68 Sterigmata ≤ 5.5 μm 41
      69 Spore ornamentation echinulate to aculeate, up to 1 µm long Thelephora aurantispora
      69 Spore ornamentation echinulate, up to 1.5 μm long Thelephora changbaiensis

      Key to upright species of Thelephora from China.
      1 Cystidia present 2
      1 Cystidia absent 4
      2 Cystidia one type 3
      2 Cystidia two types Thelephora grandinioides
      3 Cystidia clavate Thelephora ganbajun
      3 Cystidia tubular Thelephora wuliangshanensis
      4 Sterigmata 2–4 5
      4 Sterigmata 4 9
      5 Hyphae commonly clamped and
      simple-septate
      Thelephora austrosinensis
      5 Hyphae clamped 6
      6 Basidiospores umber purple Thelephora caryophyllea
      6 Basidiospores fuscous purple 7
      7 Basidiomata imbricate 8
      7 Basidiomata clavarioid Thelephora palmata
      8 Pileus spathulate to flabelliform Thelephora japonic
      8 Pileus dimidiate or spuriously
      infundibuliform
      Thelephora terrestris
      9 Hyphae clamped 10
      9 Hyphae clamped and simple-septate 16
      10 Basidiospores lobed 12
      10 Basidiospores not lobed 11
      11 Basidia subclavate Thelephora subtropica
      11 Basidia barreled Thelephora yunnanensis
      12 Hymenial surface concolorous with
      abhymenial surface
      13
      12 Hymenial surface not concolorous with
      abhymenial surface
      14
      13 Pileus spathulate to narrow petaloid Thelephora dactyliophora
      13 Pileus clavate to pinnatifid or ramiform Thelephora pinnatifida
      14 Smell strong Thelephora aurantiotincta
      14 Smell not strong 15
      15 Basidiospores umber brown Thelephora penicillata
      15 Basidiospores olive buff Thelephora vialis
      16 Stipe central 18
      16 Stipe central to lateral 17
      17 Basidiospores bluish green Thelephora pseudoganbajun
      17 Basidiospores yellowish brown Thelephora petaloides
      18 Basidiospores hyaline Thelephora sikkimensis
      18 Basidiospores not hyaline 19
      19 Abhymenial surface azonate 20
      19 Abhymenial surface zonate 22
      20 Pileus imbricate Thelephora lacunosa
      20 Pileus coralloid 21
      21 Pileal margin deeply lacerate Thelephora nigromarginata
      21 Pileal margin tips needle-like Thelephora scopiformis
      22 Smell mild 23
      22 Smell no odor 25
      23 Stipe subconical to broadened or flatted Thelephora cacao
      23 Stipe clavillose to flatted or broadened 24
      24 Pileus infundibuliform to ligulate Thelephora fasciculata
      24 Pileus clavate to coralliform Thelephora microcarpa
      25 Abhymenial surface radially rugulose or
      wrinkled
      26
      25 Abhymenial surface wrinkled Thelephora nebula
      26 Pileal margin imperceptibly wavy Thelephora glaucoflora
      26 Pileal margin irregularly lobed to wavy Thelephora aquila

    • In the present study, taxonomic and phylogenetic analyses were conducted on corticioid and hydnoid fungi belonging to the orders Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales, which were collected from subtropical and southern temperate forests in China. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions, along with the large and small subunit nuclear ribosomal RNA genes (nLSU and nSSU), were used to identify the new species and analyze the phylogenetic relationships within Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales, and complemented by small subunit mitochondrial rRNA gene sequences (mtSSU) for the genus Thelephora.

      The basidiomata of Thelephorales are primarily characterized by two morphological types: resupinate (flat and appressed), and erect (upright). In classical taxonomy, these morphological characteristics (erect or resupinate basidiomata) were widely used as key criteria for genus delineation. However, with the advancement of modern molecular phylogenetics, accumulating evidence has revealed that species with markedly divergent basidiomata (erect vs resupinate) may share close evolutionary relationships. In recent years, progress has been made in investigating the diversity and phylogeny of Thelephora/Tomentella, yet their phylogenetic relationships remain unclear[38,147,151]. Micromorphologically, the two genera share similar characteristics, including a monomitic hyphal system with clamp connections in generative hyphae and warted or echinulate basidiospores. Macromorphologically, members of Tomentella possess resupinate basidiomata—either separable from or adherent to the substrate—with hymenophoral surfaces that are smooth or granulose, and exhibit various colors. In contrast, Thelephora is characterized by the diverse shapes of basidiomata (stereoid, imbricate, rosette, infundibuliform, or coralloid), abhymenial surfaces ranging from glabrous to strigose or wrinkled, and hymenophoral surfaces that are smooth, slightly rugose, or warted. Ecologically, Thelephora basidiomata are typically epigeous (growing on the ground), while those of Tomentella are often found on decaying wood or soil, etc., indicating distinct ecological niches between the two genera. Phylogenetically, the two genera form a paraphyletic group[138,147]. Based on previous studies, Kõljalg et al.[151] proposed merging Tomentella into Thelephora but noted that their phylogenetic relationships require further clarification using additional genetic loci or whole-genome data. In this study, phylogenetic analyses of 193 species revealed a strongly supported monophyletic clade (100% ML, 1.00 BPP, Fig. 6) encompassing all Thelephora samples, consistent with the taxonomic framework established by Kõljalg et al.[151].

      The stipitate hydnoid genera within Thelephorales include Hydnellum, Neosarcodon, Phellodon, and Sarcodon. In the present study, the phylogenetic trees (Figs 24) clarified the phylogenetic relationships among members of Hydnellum, Phellodon, Sarcodon, and Neosarcodon at both the generic and species levels. Three genera, Hydnellum, Neosarcodon, and Sarcodon formed a distinct clade with high support (76% ML, 0.99 BPP, Fig. 6). Collectively, Hydnellum, Neosarcodon, and Sarcodon form a highly supported clade within Thelephorales. These results are consistent with the latest taxonomic framework for genera in Thelephorales[13]. However, Boletopsis (Boletopsidaceae) is closely related to Lenzitopsis (Lenzitopsidaceae) (Fig. 6). This finding conflicts with previous studies on intergeneric phylogenetic relationships[13]. The species diversity of these relatively undersampled genera requires further investigation together with other taxa within Thelephorales. Additionally, incorporating more gene fragments and whole-genome sequencing data into phylogenetic analyses may help clarify the intergeneric phylogenetic relationships. However, no whole-genome sequences are currently available for any species of Amaurodon or Tomentellopsis. Hence, it is necessary to carry out more in-depth phylogenetic analyses for these genera with more samples and sequences worldwide.

      The stipitate hydnoid species within the order Thelephorales are the ectomycorrhizal fungi. Records of basidiomata for many stipitate hydnoid species are declining across numerous countries, with some even disappearing entirely[58,187189]. For instance, in countries such as the Netherlands, Germany, Poland, Belgium, Sweden, and Czechoslovakia, species of Boletopsis, Hydnellum, Phellodon, and Sarcodon have undergone significant population declines or face extinction risks[56,58,60]. Members of the stipitate hydnoid fungal genera are considered endangered and have been included in the Red Data Lists of several European countries, apparently due to soil nitrification[58,59,190194]. Following the publication of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List update 2023.1, five stipitate hydnoid fungi species have been officially assessed as threatened on a global scale. In the present study, 11 new species of stipitate hydnoid fungi (Hydnellum, Neosarcodon, Phellodon, and Sarcodon) are described based solely on their holotypes. Given that some stipitate hydnoid species are known to produce relatively few basidiomata[48,195197], we speculate that the new species not only exhibit an extremely restricted distribution but also produce basidiomata at low abundance in the wild. This phenomenon indicates parallel conservation crises between China and European nations, with stipitate hydnoid fungi undergoing dramatic declines that may approach regional extinction. Meanwhile, the significant decline in stipitate hydnoid fungi abundance serves as a critical bioindicator of diminishing basidiomata among ectomycorrhizal fungi worldwide, underscoring the increasing urgency of forest ecosystem protection. The identification of previously unknown or misclassified taxa in China will facilitate more comprehensive assessments of their distribution patterns, rarity, habitat preferences, and conservation status. This, in turn, can inform potential management strategies where necessary.

      Although high species diversity among Hymenochaetales has been discovered in recent years[29,33,198201], exploring species resources still holds great significance in China. The present study focuses on the corticioid fungi in Hymenochaetales characterized by a smooth to tuberculate hymenophore, viz. Hymenochaete (Hymenochaetaceae), Peniophorella (Peniophorellaceae), Lyomyces (Schizoporaceae), and Xylodon (Schizoporaceae). Five new species from these four genera are described, all of which are wood-inhabiting fungi. Although diverse hymenophoral configurations may exist even within the same genus of Hymenochaetales (e.g., Hymenochaete and Xylodon), such morphological variations do not impede species delimitation. For instance, the basidiomata of Hymenochaete species can exhibit forms ranging from effused-reflexed to pileate, or resupinate, as observed in the newly described species, Hymenochaete baishanzuensis.

      Three genera—Fasciodontia, Lyomyces, and Xylodon—previously classified under Hyphodontia sensu lato, form a strongly supported clade, which is consistent with findings from previous studies[29,32,177]. The genus Xylodon exhibits remarkable diversity in hymenophore surface morphology, including smooth to grandinioid, tuberculate, raduloid, distinctly hydnoid and poroid. Notably, both newly described species of Xylodon described in this study are characterized by tuberculate hymenophoral surfaces. The phylogenetic analysis reveals that the new species, Lyomyces membranaceus, is most closely related to Lyomyces microfasciculatus (Fig. 9). Additionally, the present study indicates that Chinese specimens identified as L. microfasciculatus may represent a species complex, which includes L. membranaceus. The findings not only elucidate the taxonomic complexities surrounding the genus Lyomyces in China but also suggest it harbors considerable undiscovered diversity, meriting in-depth phylogenetic and taxonomic investigations. Peniophorella occupies an independent position relative to other known genera and families in Hymenochaetales, which is consistent with previous research[32]. To date, 39 species are accepted in Peniophorella, although the phylogenetic placement of certain taxa—such as Pe. pallida (Fig. 8)—requires further investigation.

      In this study, 30 new species within the Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales are described, thereby enhancing the corticioid and hydnoid species diversity in southern China, and facilitating their resource utilization. However, within the Thelephorales, the phylogenetic relationships between families remain ambiguous, and their boundaries are still not clearly delineated. Genomic data from more species of Thelephorales will help determine the current taxonomic framework.

      • Not applicable.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: conceptualization, supervision, funding acquisition, and writing–review: Yuan H; investigation: Yuan H, Wei Y, Zhu Y, Zhou L, Liu J, Yuan Y; data collection: Wei Y, Zhu Y, Zhou L, Liu J, Yuan Y; analysis and interpretation of results: Zhu Y, Zhou L; draft manuscript preparation: Zhu Y, Zhou L. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The data that support the findings of this study are available in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) databases, the UNITE database, and the Fungal Names repository.

      • We are grateful to Xue-Lian Gao, Yan-Yan He, Xiang-Hua Wang, Yang-Ling Deng, Jian-Feng Tan, and Zhong-Ping Feng for collecting specimens. This study was financed by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project Nos U2102220 & 32570013), the Fund of CAS Key Laboratory of Forest Ecology and Silviculture, Institute of Applied Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (No. KLFES-2028), and the Fund of Biological Resources Programme, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS-TAX-24-027).

      • The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

      • #Authors contributed equally: Yaquan Zhu, Linjiang zhou

      • Supplementary Table S1 A list of species, specimens and GenBank accession numbers of the sequences used in this study.
      • Copyright: © 2026 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (69)  Table (3) References (201)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhu Y, Zhou L, Liu J, Yuan Y, Wei Y, et al. 2026. Thirty new species in Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales from the Eastern Himalayas and Southern China. Mycosphere 17: e001 doi: 10.48130/mycosphere-0026-0001
    Zhu Y, Zhou L, Liu J, Yuan Y, Wei Y, et al. 2026. Thirty new species in Thelephorales and Hymenochaetales from the Eastern Himalayas and Southern China. Mycosphere 17: e001 doi: 10.48130/mycosphere-0026-0001

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return