Search
1995 Volume 10
Article Contents
RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Evaluation of workbenches which support the CommonKADS methodology

More Information
  • Abstract: The KADS methodology and its successor, CommonKADS, have gained a reputation for being useful approaches to building knowledge-based systems in a manner which is both systematic and well documented. However, these methods require considerable effort to use them completely. It has been suggested that automated support for KADS or CommonKADS users, in the form of “knowledge engineering workbenches”, could be very useful. These tools would provide computerised assistance to knowledge engineers in organising and representing knowledge, in a similar fashion to the support which CASE tools provide for software engineers. To provide support for KADS or CommonKADS, the workbenches should provide specific support for the modelling techniques recommended by these methods, which are very detailed in the representation and analysis stages of knowledge engineering. A good knowledge engineering workbench should also be easy to use, should be robust and reliable, and should generate output in a presentable format.This paper reports on an evaluation of two commercially available workbenches for supporting the KADS approach: KADS Tool from ILOG and Open KADS Tool from Bull. This evaluation was carried out by AIAI as part of the CATALYST project, funded by the European Community's ESSI programme, which aimed to introduce CommonKADS to two technology-oriented companies. Information is also presented on two other workbenches: the CommonKADS workbench (which will soon become commercially available) and the VITAL workbench. The results show various strengths and weaknesses in each tool.
  • 加载中
  • Anjewierden A, Wielemaker J and Toussaint C, 1990. “Shelley—Computer Aided Knowledge Engineering” Current Trends in Knowledge Acquisition, IOS Press.

    Google Scholar

    Breuker J and van de Velde W, 1994. The CommonKADS Library: reusable components for artificial problem solving, IOS Press, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar

    CCTA, 1990. ISE Appraisal and Evaluation Library, HMSO, London.

    Google Scholar

    de Greef HP and Breuker J, 1992. “Analysing system-user cooperation in KADS” Knowledge Acquisition4 (1) 89–108.

    Google Scholar

    de Hoog R, Benus B, Metselaar C, 1993. “Applying the CommonKADS organisational model” Restricted circulation KADS-II/T1.1/UvA/RR/004/4.1, ESPRIT project P5248 KADS-II.

    Google Scholar

    de Hoog R, Martil R, Wielinga B, Taylor R, Bright C and van de Velde W, 1993. “The CommonKADS model set” ESPRIT Project P5248 KADS-II/M1/DM1.lb/UvA/018/5.0, University of Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar

    Domingue J and Watt S, 1991. “Graphical User Interface and Windowing in the VITAL Project” VITAL Series 84, Human Cognition Research Laboratory, The Open University, Walton Hall, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA.

    Google Scholar

    Domingue J, Price B and Eisenstadt M, 1992. “Viz: a framework for describing and implementing software visualization systems” In: Gilmore D and Winder R (eds.), User-Centred Requirements for Software Engineering Environments, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Domingue J, Motta E and Watt S, 1993. “The Emerging VITAL Workbench” In: Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge-based Systems: 7th European Workshop EKAW '93, pp 320–339, Toulouse and Caylus, France. Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar

    Domingue J, Eisenstadt M and Price B, 1994. “The VITAL visualization tool report” VITAL Project Report DD342, HCRL, Open University.

    Google Scholar

    DTI/NCC, 1987. STARTS guide, volume 1. NCC publications.

    Google Scholar

    Gaspari M and Motta E, 1994. “Symbol-level requirements for agent-level programming” In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI '94.

    Google Scholar

    Kingston JKC, 1993a. “Pragmatic KADS 1.0” Technical Report AIAI-IR-13, AIAI, University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar

    Kingston JKC, 1993b. “Re-engineering IMPRESS and X-MATE using CommonKADS” In: Expert Systems 93. British Computer Society, Cambridge University Press. (Also available as AIAI-TR-130)

    Google Scholar

    Motta E, O'Hara K, Shadbolt N, Stutt A and Zdrahal Z, 1995. “Solving VT in VITAL: A Study in Model Construction and Knowledge Reuse” International Journal of Human Computer Studies.

    Google Scholar

    Rumbaugh J, Blaha M, Premerlani W, Eddy F and Lorensen W, 1991. Object-Oriented Modelling and Design, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar

    Schreiber ATh, Wielinga BJ, and Breuker JA, (eds), 1993. KADS: A Principled Approach to Knowledge- Based System Development, Academic Press, London.

    Google Scholar

    Shadbolt N, Motta E and Rouge A, 1993. “Constructing Knowledge Based Systems” IEEE Software.

    Google Scholar

    Stutt A and Motta E, 1995. “Recording the design decisions of a knowledge engineering community to facilitate re-use of design models” In: Proceedings of the 1995 Knowledge Acquisition Workshop, Banff, Canada.

    Google Scholar

    Tansley DSW and Hayball CC, 1993. Knowledge-Based Systems Analysis and Design: A KADS Developers Handbook, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar

    Valente A and Löckenhoff C, 1994. “Assessment” In: Breuker J and de Velde W van (eds), The CommonKADS Library, pp 169–190. KADS-II Consortium, KADS-II/TM.2/VUB/TR/054/3.0. (Also available as a book from IOS Press)

    Google Scholar

    van Harmelen F and Balder JR, 1992. “(ML)2: a formal language for KADS models of expertise” Knowledge Acquisition4 (1).

    Google Scholar

    Waern A, Höök K, Gustavsson R and Holm P, 1994. “The CommonKADS Communication Model” ESPRIT Project P5248 KADS-II KADS-II/M3/TR/SICS, Swedish Institute of Computer Science.

    Google Scholar

    Wielinga B, van de Velde W., Schreiber G and Akkermans H, 1992. “The KADS Knowledge Modelling Approach” In: Proceedings of the Japanese Knowledge Acquisition Workshop (JKAW '92).

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    John K. C. Kingston, Jim G. Doheny, Ian M. Filby. 1995. Evaluation of workbenches which support the CommonKADS methodology. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10:7487 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900007487
    John K. C. Kingston, Jim G. Doheny, Ian M. Filby. 1995. Evaluation of workbenches which support the CommonKADS methodology. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10:7487 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900007487

Article Metrics

Article views(14) PDF downloads(133)

Other Articles By Authors

RESEARCH ARTICLE   Open Access    

Evaluation of workbenches which support the CommonKADS methodology

The Knowledge Engineering Review  10 Article number: 10.1017/S0269888900007487  (1995)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Abstract: The KADS methodology and its successor, CommonKADS, have gained a reputation for being useful approaches to building knowledge-based systems in a manner which is both systematic and well documented. However, these methods require considerable effort to use them completely. It has been suggested that automated support for KADS or CommonKADS users, in the form of “knowledge engineering workbenches”, could be very useful. These tools would provide computerised assistance to knowledge engineers in organising and representing knowledge, in a similar fashion to the support which CASE tools provide for software engineers. To provide support for KADS or CommonKADS, the workbenches should provide specific support for the modelling techniques recommended by these methods, which are very detailed in the representation and analysis stages of knowledge engineering. A good knowledge engineering workbench should also be easy to use, should be robust and reliable, and should generate output in a presentable format.This paper reports on an evaluation of two commercially available workbenches for supporting the KADS approach: KADS Tool from ILOG and Open KADS Tool from Bull. This evaluation was carried out by AIAI as part of the CATALYST project, funded by the European Community's ESSI programme, which aimed to introduce CommonKADS to two technology-oriented companies. Information is also presented on two other workbenches: the CommonKADS workbench (which will soon become commercially available) and the VITAL workbench. The results show various strengths and weaknesses in each tool.

    • Copyright © Cambridge University Press 19951995Cambridge University Press
References (24)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    John K. C. Kingston, Jim G. Doheny, Ian M. Filby. 1995. Evaluation of workbenches which support the CommonKADS methodology. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10:7487 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900007487
    John K. C. Kingston, Jim G. Doheny, Ian M. Filby. 1995. Evaluation of workbenches which support the CommonKADS methodology. The Knowledge Engineering Review. 10:7487 doi: 10.1017/S0269888900007487
  • Catalog

      /

      DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
      Return
      Return