Search
2022 Volume 2
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

A wake-up call: signaling in regulating ornamental geophytes dormancy

  • # These authors contributed equally: Yajie Zhao, Chang Liu, Juanjuan Sui

More Information
  • Ornamental geophytes are a group of important flowers worldwide. As perennial plants, geophytes go through several rounds of life cycle under seasonal climates. The dormant trait of underground modified organs in geophytes is critical for the process of storage, planting as well as breeding. Although the dormant physiology in geophytes is complex and largely unknown, several advancements have been achieved in this field. Here, we review the knowledge on the role of environmental factors, endogenous hormones, carbohydrates, and epigenetics in the regulation of geophytes dormancy release (GDR). We also discuss dormancy release (DR) methods and their roles in geophytes, including small molecular chemicals and wounding treatments.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    Rohde A, Bhalerao RP. 2007. Plant dormancy in the perennial context. Trends in Plant Science 12:217−23

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2007.03.012

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Wu J, Wu W, Liang J, Jin Y, Gazzarrini S, et al. 2019. GhTCP19 transcription factor regulates corm dormancy release by repressing GhNCED expression in Gladiolus. Plant and Cell Physiology 60:52−62

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcy186

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Shim D, Ko JH, Kim WC, Wang QJ, Keathley DE, Han KH. 2014. A molecular framework for seasonal growth-dormancy regulation in perennial plants. Horticulture Research 1:14059

    doi: 10.1038/hortres.2014.59

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Gubler F, Millar AA, Jacobsen JV. 2005. Dormancy release, ABA and pre-harvest sprouting. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 8:183−87

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.01.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Wu J, Seng S, Sui J, Vonapartis E, Luo X, et al. 2015. Gladiolus hybridus ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE 5 (GhABI5) is an important transcription factor in ABA signaling that can enhance Gladiolus corm dormancy and Arabidopsis seed dormancy. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:960

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00960

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Beauvieux R, Wenden B, Dirlewanger E. 2018. Bud dormancy in perennial fruit tree species: A pivotal role for oxidative cues. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:657

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00657

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Liu JY, Sherif SM. 2019. Hormonal orchestration of bud dormancy cycle in deciduous woody perennials. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1136

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01136

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Martín-Fontecha ES, Tarancón C, Cubas P. 2018. To grow or not to grow, a power-saving program induced in dormant buds. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 41:102−9

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2017.10.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Lloret A, Badenes ML, Ríos G. 2018. Modulation of Dormancy and Growth Responses in Reproductive Buds of Temperate Trees. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1368

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01368

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Rohde A, Bastien C, Boerjan W, Thomas S. 2011. Temperature signals contribute to the timing of photoperiodic growth cessation and bud set in poplar. Tree Physiology 31:472−82

    doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpr038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Ma Y, Dai X, Xu Y, Luo W, Zheng X, et al. 2015. COLD1 confers chilling tolerance in rice. Cell 160:1209−21

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.046

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    MacGregor DR, Zhang N, Iwasaki M, Chen M, Dave A, et al. 2019. ICE1 and ZOU determine the depth of primary seed dormancy in Arabidopsis independently of their role in endosperm development. The Plant Journal 98:277−90

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.14211

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Miotto YE, Tessele C, Czermainski ABC, Porto DD, da Silveira Falavigna V, et al. 2019. Spring is coming: genetic analyses of the bud break date locus reveal candidate genes from the cold perception pathway to dormancy release in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.). Frontiers in Plant Science 10:33

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.00033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Takemura Y, Kuroki K, Shida Y, Araki S, Takeuchi Y, et al. 2015. Comparative transcriptome analysis of the less-dormant Taiwanese pear and the dormant Japanese pear during winter season. Plos One 10:e0139595

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139595

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Horvath DP, Chao WS, Suttle JC, Thimmapuram J, Anderson JV. 2008. Transcriptome analysis identifies novel responses and potential regulatory genes involved in seasonal dormancy transitions of leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.). BMC Genomics 9:536

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-536

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Fan X, Yang Y, Li M, Fu L, Zang Y, et al. 2020. Transcriptome and targeted metabolome reveal the regulation network of Lilium davidii var. unicolor during dormancy release. Preprint

    doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-126184/v1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Wu J, Jin Y, Liu C, Vonapartis E, Liang J, et al. 2019. GhNAC83 inhibits corm dormancy release by regulating ABA signaling and cytokinin biosynthesis in Gladiolus hybridus. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:1221−37

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery428

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Tang K, Zhao L, Ren Y, Yang S, Zhu J, et al. 2020. The transcription factor ICE1 functions in cold stress response by binding to the promoters of CBF and COR genes. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 62:258−63

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12918

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Li J, Yan X, Yang Q, Ma Y, Yang B, et al. 2019. PpCBFs selectively regulate PpDAMs and contribute to the pear bud endodormancy process. Plant Molecular Biology 99:575−86

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-019-00837-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Bielenberg DG, Wang Y, Li Z, Zhebentyayeva T, Fan S, et al. 2008. Sequencing and annotation of the evergrowing locus in peach [Prunus persica (L.) Batsch] reveals a cluster of six MADS-box transcription factors as candidate genes for regulation of terminal bud formation. Tree Genetics & Genomes 4:495−507

    doi: 10.1007/s11295-007-0126-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Lee JH, Yoo SJ, Park SH, Hwang I, Lee JS, Ahn JH. 2007. Role of SVP in the control of flowering time by ambient temperature in Arabidopsis. Genes & Development 21:397−402

    doi: 10.1101/gad.1518407

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Takahashi H, Nishihara M, Yoshida C, Itoh K. 2022. Gentian FLOWERING LOCUS T orthologs regulate phase transitions: floral induction and endodormancy release. Plant Physiology 188:1887−99

    doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiac007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Böhlenius H, Huang T, Charbonnel-Campaa L, Brunner AM, Jansson S, et al. 2006. CO/FT regulatory module controls timing of flowering and seasonal growth cessation in trees. Science 312:1040−43

    doi: 10.1126/science.1126038

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Pan W, Liang J, Sui J, Li J, Liu C, et al. 2021. ABA and bud dormancy in perennials: current knowledge and future perspective. Genes 12:1635

    doi: 10.3390/genes12101635

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Jung JH, Domijan M, Klose C, Biswas S, Ezer D, et al. 2016. Phytochromes function as thermosensors in Arabidopsis. Science 354:886−89

    doi: 10.1126/science.aaf6005

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Qiu Y, Li M, Kim RJA, Moore CM, Chen M. 2019. Daytime temperature is sensed by phytochrome B in Arabidopsis through a transcriptional activator HEMERA. Nature Communications 10:140

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08059-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Le Nard M. 1993. The physiology of flower bulbs: A comprehensive treatise on the physiology and utilization of ornamental flowering bulbous and tuberous plants. Amsterdam: Elsevier

    [28]

    Pedmale UV, Huang SSC, Zander M, Cole BJ, Hetzel J, et al. 2016. Cryptochromes interact directly with PIFs to control plant growth in limiting blue light. Cell 164:233−45

    doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.12.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Lu X, Zhou C, Xu P, Luo Q, Lian H, et al. 2015. Red-light-dependent interaction of phyB with SPA1 promotes COP1-SPA1 dissociation and photomorphogenic development in Arabidopsis. Molecular Plant 8:467−78

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2014.11.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Paradiso R, Proietti S. 2022. Light-quality manipulation to control plant growth and photomorphogenesis in greenhouse horticulture: The state of the art and the opportunities of modern LED systems. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 41:742−80

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-021-10337-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Kami C, Lorrain S, Hornitschek P, Fankhauser C. 2010. Light-regulated plant growth and development. In Current Topics in Developmental Biology, Plant Development, ed. Timmermans MCP. 91: 455. USA: Academic Press, Elesvier. pp. 29−66 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0070-2153(10)91002-8html

    [32]

    Legris M, Ince YÇ, Fankhauser C. 2019. Molecular mechanisms underlying phytochrome-controlled morphogenesis in plants. Nature Communications 10:5219

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13045-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Ding J, Zhang B, Li Y, André D, Nilsson O. 2021. Phytochrome B and PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR8 modulate seasonal growth in trees. The New Phytologist 232:2339−52

    doi: 10.1111/nph.17350

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    de Lucas M, Davière JM, Rodríguez-Falcón M, Pontin M, Iglesias-Pedraz JM, et al. 2008. A molecular framework for light and gibberellin control of cell elongation. Nature 451:480−84

    doi: 10.1038/nature06520

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Yang L, Liu S, Lin R. 2020. The role of light in regulating seed dormancy and germination. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 62:1310−26

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.13001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Gubler F, Hughes T, Waterhouse P, Jacobsen J. 2008. Regulation of dormancy in barley by blue light and after-ripening: effects on abscisic acid and gibberellin metabolism. Plant Physiology 147:886−96

    doi: 10.1104/pp.107.115469

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Goggin DE, Steadman KJ, Powles SB. 2008. Green and blue light photoreceptors are involved in maintenance of dormancy in imbibed annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum) seeds. The New Phytologist 180:81−89

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02570.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Gachango E, Shibairo S, Kabira J, Chemining'wa G, Demo P. 2008. Effects of light intensity on quality of potato seed tubers. African Journal of Agricultural Research 3:732−39

    Google Scholar

    [39]

    Langens-Gerrits ML, Nashimoto S, Croes A, De Klerk G. 2001. Development of dormancy in different lily genotypes regenerated in vitro. Plant Growth Regulation 34:215−22

    doi: 10.1023/A:1013318810119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Ben-Hod G, Kigel J, Steinitz B. 1988. Dormancy and flowering in Anemone coronaria L. as affected by photoperiod and temperature. Annals of Botany 61:623−33

    doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087596

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Masuda J, Urakawa T, Ozaki Y, Okubo H. 2006. Short photoperiod induces dormancy in Lotus (Nelumbo nucifera). Annals of Botany 97:39−45

    doi: 10.1093/aob/mcj008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Wilkins HF. 2005. Lilium longiflorum Thunb., a classic model to study temperature and photoperiod interactions on dormancy, flower induction, leaf unfolding and flower development. Proc. IX International Symposium on Flower Bulbs, ISHS Acta Horticulturae 673, 2005. Niigata, Japan: ISHS Acta Horticulturae. pp. 293−96 https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.673.36html

    [43]

    Rudnicki RM, Nowak J, Saniewski M. 1976. The effect of gibberellic acid on sprouting and flowering of some tulip cultivars. Scientia Horticulturae 4:387−97

    doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(76)90107-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Situma MN, Mwangi M, Mulwa RMS. 2015. Effects of benzyl adenine and gibberellic acid pre-treatments on dormancy release, flowering time and multiplication of oriental lily (Lilium longiflorum) bulbs. Journal of Applied Horticulture 17:26−30

    doi: 10.37855/jah.2015.v17i01.06

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Marković M, Trifunović Momčilov M, Uzelac B, Jevremović S, Subotić A. 2021. Bulb dormancy in vitro—Fritillaria meleagris: initiation, release and physiological parameters. Plants 10:902

    doi: 10.3390/plants10050902

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Edrisi B, Mirzaei S. 2017. An investigation into the effect of gibberellic acid and storage temperature on vegetative and reproductive characteristics of tuberose (Polianthes tuberosa). Journal of Ornamental Plants 7:137−46

    Google Scholar

    [47]

    Busov VB. 2019. Plant development: dual roles of poplar SVL in vegetative bud dormancy. Current Biology 29:R68−R70

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.11.061

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Marković M, Trifunović Momčilov M, Uzelac B, Cingel A, Milošević S, et al. 2020. Breaking the dormancy of snake's head fritillary (Fritillaria meleagris L.) in vitro bulbs−Part 1: effect of GA3, GA inhibitors and temperature on fresh weight, sprouting and sugar content. Plants 9:1449

    doi: 10.3390/plants9111449

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Rinne PLH, Welling A, Vahala J, Ripel L, Ruonala R, et al. 2011. Chilling of dormant buds hyperinduces FLOWERING LOCUS T and recruits GA-inducible 1, 3-β-glucanases to reopen signal conduits and release dormancy in Populus. The Plant Cell 23:130−46

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.081307

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Zhang Y, Yuan Y, Liu Z, Zhang T, Li F, et al. 2021. GA3 is superior to GA4 in promoting bud endodormancy release in tree peony (Paeonia suffruticosa) and their potential working mechanism. BMC Plant Biology 21:323

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03106-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Lv L, Huo X, Wen L, Gao Z, Khalil-Ur-Rehman M. 2018. Isolation and role of PmRGL2 in GA-mediated floral bud dormancy release in Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Siebold et Zucc.). Frontiers in Plant Science 9:27

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Subbaraj AK, Funnell KA, Woolley DJ. 2010. Dormancy and flowering are regulated by the reciprocal interaction between cytokinin and gibberellin in Zantedeschia. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 29:487−99

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-010-9160-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Letham DS, Smith NG, Willcocks DA. 2003. Cytokinin metabolism in Narcissus bulbs: chilling promotes acetylation of zeatin riboside. Functional Plant Biology 30:525−32

    doi: 10.1071/FP02097

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Bromley JR, Warnes BJ, Newell CA, Thomson JCP, James CM, et al. 2014. A purine nucleoside phosphorylase in Solanum tuberosum L. (potato) with specificity for cytokinins contributes to the duration of tuber endodormancy. The Biochemical Journal 458:225−37

    doi: 10.1042/BJ20130792

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Hartmann A, Senning M, Hedden P, Sonnewald U, Sonnewald S. 2011. Reactivation of meristem activity and sprout growth in potato tubers require both cytokinin and gibberellin. Plant Physiology 155:776−96

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.168252

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Ormenese S, Bernier G, Périlleux C. 2006. Cytokinin application to the shoot apical meristem of Sinapis alba enhances secondary plasmodesmata formation. Planta 224:1481−4

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-006-0317-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Horner W, Brunkard JO. 2021. Cytokinins stimulate plasmodesmatal transport in leaves. Frontiers in Plant Science 12:674128

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.674128

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Alamar MC, Anastasiadi M, Lopez-Cobollo R, Bennett MH, Thompson AJ, et al. 2020. Transcriptome and phytohormone changes associated with ethylene-induced onion bulb dormancy. Postharvest Biology and Technology 168:111267

    doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2020.111267

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Keren-Paz V, Borochov A. 1984. Involvement of ethylene in liatris corm dormancy. In Ethylene: Biochemical, Physiological and Applied Aspects, ed. Fuchs Y, Chalutz E. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 163−64 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-6178-4_24

    [60]

    Ruonala R, Rinne PLH, Baghour M, Moritz T, Tuominen H, et al. 2006. Transitions in the functioning of the shoot apical meristem in birch (Betula pendula) involve ethylene. The Plant Journal 46:628−40

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2006.02722.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Sumitomo K, Narumi T, Satoh S, Hisamatsu T. 2008. Involvement of the ethylene response pathway in dormancy induction in chrysanthemum. Journal of Experimental Botany 59:4075−82

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern247

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Ginzburg C. 1974. Studies on the role of ethylene in gladiolus cormel germination. Plant Science Letters 2:133−38

    doi: 10.1016/0304-4211(74)90011-X

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Uyemura S, Imanishi H. 1984. Effects of duration of exposure to ethylene on dormancy release in freesia corms. Scientia Horticulturae 22:383−90

    doi: 10.1016/S0304-4238(84)80010-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Imanishi H, Fortanier EJ. 1983. Effects of exposing freesia corms to ethylene or to smoke on dormancy-breaking and flowering. Scientia Horticulturae 18:381−89

    doi: 10.1016/0304-4238(83)90019-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Nelson DC, Riseborough JA, Flematti GR, Stevens J, Ghisalberti EL, et al. 2009. Karrikins discovered in smoke trigger Arabidopsis seed germination by a mechanism requiring gibberellic acid synthesis and light. Plant Physiology 149:863−73

    doi: 10.1104/pp.108.131516

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Trengove RD. 2004. A compound from smoke that promotes seed germination. Science 305:977

    doi: 10.1126/science.1099944

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Nelson DC, Flematti GR, Ghisalberti EL, Dixon KW, Smith SM. 2012. Regulation of seed germination and seedling growth by chemical signals from burning vegetation. Annual Review of Plant Biology 63:107−30

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042811-105545

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Wang L, Xu Q, Yu H, Ma H, Li X, et al. 2020. Strigolactone and karrikin signaling pathways elicit ubiquitination and proteolysis of SMXL2 to regulate hypocotyl elongation in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 32:2251−70

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.20.00140

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Wang L, Waters MT, Smith SM. 2018. Karrikin-KAI2 signalling provides Arabidopsis seeds with tolerance to abiotic stress and inhibits germination under conditions unfavourable to seedling establishment. The New Phytologist 219:605−18

    doi: 10.1111/nph.15192

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Sami A, Rehman S, Tanvir MA, Zhou X, Zhu Z, et al. 2020. Assessment of the germination potential of Brassica oleracea seeds treated with karrikin 1 and cyanide, which modify the ethylene biosynthetic pathway. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 40:1257−69

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-020-10186-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Chandel NS. 2021. Glycolysis. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 13:a040535

    doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a040535

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Amir J, Kahn V, Unterman M. 1977. Respiration, ATP level, and sugar accumulation in potato tubers during storage at 4°. Phytochemistry 16:1495−98

    doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(77)84008-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Chrungoo NK. 1992. Concepts of dormancy regulation in vegetative plant propagules: A review. Environmental and Experimental Botany 32:309−18

    doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(92)90043-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Argüello JA, de Bottini GA, Luna R, Bottini R. 1986. Dormancy in Garlic (Allium sativum L.) cv. Rosado Paraguayo II. The onset of the process during plant ontogeny. Plant Cell Physiol 27:553−57

    doi: 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.PCP.A077132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Lazare S, Bechar D, Fernie AR, Brotman Y, Zaccai M. 2019. The proof is in the bulb: glycerol influences key stages of lily development. The Plant Journal 97:321−40

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.14122

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Kamenetsky R, Zemah H, Ranwala AP, Vergeldt F, Ranwala NK, et al. 2003. Water status and carbohydrate pools in tulip bulbs during dormancy release. New Phytologist 158:109−18

    doi: 10.1046/j.1469-8137.2003.00719.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Han H, Yi M. 2012. MRI can reveal metabolic changes in lily bulbs in vivo during dormancy release. Science China Life Sciences 55:1002−6

    doi: 10.1007/s11427-012-4394-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Yang C, Li Q, Jiang X, Fan Y, Gao J, et al. 2016. Dynamic changes in α- and β-amylase activities and gene expression in bulbs of the Oriental hybrid lily 'Siberia' during dormancy release. The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 90:753−59

    doi: 10.1080/14620316.2015.11668742

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Sonnewald S, Sonnewald U. 2014. Regulation of potato tuber sprouting. Planta 239:27−38

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-013-1968-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Chen Q, Zhang J, Li G. 2022. Dynamic epigenetic modifications in plant sugar signal transduction. Trends in Plant Science 27:379−90

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2021.10.009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Debast S, Nunes-Nesi A, Hajirezaei MR, Hofmann J, Sonnewald U, et al. 2011. Altering trehalose-6-phosphate content in transgenic potato tubers affects tuber growth and alters responsiveness to hormones during sprouting. Plant Physiology 156:1754−71

    doi: 10.1104/pp.111.179903

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Ríos G, Leida C, Conejero A, Badenes ML. 2014. Epigenetic regulation of bud dormancy events in perennial plants. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:247

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00247

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Li W, Yong Y, Zhang Y, Lyu Y. 2019. Transcriptional Regulatory Network of GA Floral Induction Pathway in LA Hybrid Lily. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 20:2694

    doi: 10.3390/ijms20112694

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Luján-Soto E, Dinkova TD. 2021. Time to Wake Up: Epigenetic and Small-RNA-Mediated Regulation during Seed Germination. Plants 10:236

    doi: 10.3390/plants10020236

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Saito T, Bai S, Imai T, Ito A, Nakajima I, et al. 2015. Histone modification and signalling cascade of thedormancy-associated MADS-box gene, PpMADS13-1, in Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia) during endodormancy. Plant, Cell & Environment 38:1157−66

    doi: 10.1111/pce.12469

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Leida C, Conesa A, Llácer G, Badenes ML, Ríos G. 2012. Histone modifications and expression of DAM6 gene in peach are modulated during bud dormancy release in a cultivar-dependent manner. The New Phytologist 193:67−80

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03863.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Azeez A, Zhao YC, Singh RK, Yordanov YS, Dash M, et al. 2021. EARLY BUD-BREAK 1 and EARLY BUD-BREAK 3 control resumption of poplar growth after winter dormancy. Nature Communications 12:1123

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21449-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    David Law R, Suttle JC. 2004. Changes in histone H3 and H4 multi-acetylation during natural and forced dormancy break in potato tubers. Physiologia Plantarum 120:642−49

    doi: 10.1111/j.0031-9317.2004.0273.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Iwasaki M, Penfield S, Lopez-Molina L. 2022. Parental and environmental control of seed dormancy in Arabidopsis thaliana. Annual Review of Plant Biology 73:355−78

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-090750

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Zhou Y, Wang W, Yang L, Su X, He M. 2021. Identification and expression analysis of microRNAs in response to dormancy release during cold storage of Lilium pumilum bulbs. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation 40:388−404

    doi: 10.1007/s00344-020-10108-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Guyomarc'h S, Bertrand C, Delarue M, Zhou D. 2005. Regulation of meristem activity by chromatin remodelling. Trends in Plant Science 10:332−38

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2005.05.003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Genger RK, Peacock JW, Dennis ES, Finnegan JE. 2003. Opposing effects of reduced DNA methylation on flowering time in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 216:461−66

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-002-0855-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Yang Z, Qian S, Scheid RN, Lu L, Chen X, et al. 2018. EBS is a bivalent histone reader that regulates floral phase transition in Arabidopsis. Nature Genetics 50:1247−53

    doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0187-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Cao Y, Dai Y, Cui S, Ma L. 2008. Histone H2B monoubiquitination in the chromatin of FLOWERING LOCUS C regulates flowering time in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 20:2586−602

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.108.062760

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Bu Z, Yu Y, Li Z, Liu Y, Jiang W, et al. 2014. Regulation of Arabidopsis flowering by the histone mark readers MRG1/2 via interaction with CONSTANS to modulate FT expression. PLoS Genetics 10:e1004617

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004617

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Oliver SN, Finnegan EJ, Dennis ES, Peacock WJ, Trevaskis B. 2009. Vernalization-induced flowering in cereals is associated with changes in histone methylation at the VERNALIZATION1 gene. PNAS 106:8386−91

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903566106

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Wu J, Ichihashi Y, Suzuki T, Shibata A, Shirasu K, et al. 2019. Abscisic acid-dependent histone demethylation during postgermination growth arrest in Arabidopsis. Plant, Cell & Environment 42:2198−214

    doi: 10.1111/pce.13547

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Willmann MR, Poethig RS. 2007. Conservation and evolution of miRNA regulatory programs in plant development. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 10:503−11

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2007.07.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Rubio-Somoza I, Weigel D. 2011. MicroRNA networks and developmental plasticity in plants. Trends in Plant Science 16:258−64

    doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2011.03.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Megha S, Basu U, Kav NNV. 2018. Regulation of low temperature stress in plants by microRNAs. Plant, Cell & Environment 41:1−15

    doi: 10.1111/pce.12956

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Gao J, Ni X, Li H, Hayat F, Shi T, et al. 2021. miR169 and PmRGL2 synergistically regulate the NF-Y complex to activate dormancy release in Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.). Plant Mol Biol 105:83−97

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-020-01070-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Garighan J, Dvorak E, Estevan J, Loridon K, Huettel B, et al. 2021. The identification of small RNAs differentially expressed in apple buds reveals a potential role of the Mir159-MYB regulatory module during dormancy. Plants 10:2665

    doi: 10.3390/plants10122665

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Niu Q, Li J, Cai D, Qian M, Jia H, et al. 2016. Dormancy-associated MADS-box genes and microRNAs jointly control dormancy transition in pear (Pyrus pyrifolia white pear group) flower bud. Journal of Experimental Botany 67:239−57

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv454

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Santin F, Bhogale S, Fantino E, Grandellis C, Banerjee AK, et al. 2017. Solanum tuberosum StCDPK1 is regulated by miR390 at the posttranscriptional level and phosphorylates the auxin efflux carrier StPIN4 in vitro, a potential downstream target in potato development. Physiologia Plantarum 159:244−61

    doi: 10.1111/ppl.12517

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Zhang Y, Wang Y, Gao X, Liu C, Gai S. 2018. Identification and characterization of microRNAs in tree peony during chilling induced dormancy release by high-throughput sequencing. Scientific Reports 8:4537

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22415-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Potkar R, Recla J, Busov V. 2013. ptr-MIR169 is a posttranscriptional repressor of PtrHAP2 during vegetative bud dormancy period of aspen (Populus tremuloides) trees. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 431:512−18

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.01.027

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Liu S, Mi X, Zhang R, An Y, Zhou Q, et al. 2019. Integrated analysis of miRNAs and their targets reveals that miR319c/TCP2 regulates apical bud burst in tea plant (Camellia sinensis). Planta 250:1111−29

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-019-03207-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Bai S, Saito T, Ito A, Tuan PA, Xu Y, et al. 2016. Small RNA and PARE sequencing in flower bud reveal the involvement of sRNAs in endodormancy release of Japanese pear (Pyrus pyrifolia 'Kosui'). BMC Genomics 17:230

    doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2514-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Begara-Morales JC, Chaki M, Valderrama R, Mata-Pérez C, Padilla MN, et al. 2019. The function of S-nitrosothiols during abiotic stress in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:4429−39

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz197

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Begara-Morales JC, Chaki M, Valderrama R, Sánchez-Calvo B, Mata-Pérez C, et al. 2018. Nitric oxide buffering and conditional nitric oxide release in stress response. Journal of Experimental Botany 69:3425−38

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ery072

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Wang Z, Ma R, Zhao M, Wang F, Zhang N, Si H. 2020. NO and ABA Interaction Regulates Tuber Dormancy and Sprouting in Potato. Frontiers in Plant Science 11:311

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00311

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Tang L, Chhajed S, Vashisth T, Olmstead MA, Olmstead JW, et al. 2019. Transcriptomic study of early responses to the bud dormancy-breaking agent hydrogen cyanamide in 'TropicBeauty' peach. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 144:244−56

    doi: 10.21273/JASHS04686-19

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Sudawan B, Chang CS, Chao HF, Ku MSB, Yen YF. 2016. Hydrogen cyanamide breaks grapevine bud dormancy in the summer through transient activation of gene expression and accumulation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. BMC Plant Biology 16:202

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-016-0889-y

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Coleman WK. 1983. An evaluation of bromoethane for breaking tuber dormancy in Solanum tuberosum L. American Potato Journal 60:161−67

    doi: 10.1007/BF02853997

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Destefano-Beltrán L, Knauber D, Huckle L, Suttle J. 2006. Chemically forced dormancy termination mimics natural dormancy progression in potato tuber meristems by reducing ABA content and modifying expression of genes involved in regulating ABA synthesis and metabolism. Journal of Experimental Botany 57:2879−86

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl050

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Reis RC, Côrrea PC, Devilla IA, Santos ES, Ascheri DPR, et al. 2013. Drying of yam starch (Discorea ssp.) and glycerol filmogenic solutions at different temperatures. LWT - Food Science and Technology 50:651−56

    doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2012.07.033

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Koo AJK, Howe GA. 2009. The wound hormone jasmonate. Phytochemistry 70:1571−80

    doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2009.07.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Sadawarti MJ, Pandey KK, Singh BP, Samadiya RK. 2016. A review on potato microtuber storability and dormancy. Journal of Applied and Natural Science 8:2319−24

    doi: 10.31018/jans.v8i4.1132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Khokhar KM. 2020. A short review on onion bulb dormancy metabolism. Advances in Biotechology & Microbiology 15:555915

    Google Scholar

    [120]

    Debeaujon I, Léon-Kloosterziel KM, Koornneef M. 2000. Influence of the testa on seed dormancy, germination, and longevity in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology 122:403−14

    doi: 10.1104/pp.122.2.403

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [121]

    Fugate KK, Ribeiro WS, Lulai EC, Deckard EL, Finger FL. 2016. Cold temperature delays wound healing in postharvest sugarbeet roots. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:499

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [122]

    Mustefa G, Mohammed W, Dechassa N, Gelmesa D. 2017. Effects of different dormancy-breaking and storage methods on seed tuber sprouting and subsequent yield of two potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties. Open Agriculture 2:220−29

    doi: 10.1515/opag-2017-0023

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [123]

    Struik PC, van der Putten PEL, Caldiz DO, Scholte K. 2006. Response of stored potato seed tubers from contrasting cultivars to accumulated day-degrees. Crop Science 46:1156−68

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.08-0267

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [124]

    Konze JR, Kwiatkowski GM. 1981. Rapidly induced ethylene formation after wounding is controlled by the regulation of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid synthesis. Planta 151:327−30

    doi: 10.1007/BF00393286

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [125]

    Lulai EC, Suttle JC, Pederson SM. 2008. Regulatory involvement of abscisic acid in potato tuber wound-healing. Journal of Experimental Botany 59:1175−86

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ern019

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [126]

    Footitt S, Clewes R, Feeney M, Finch-Savage WE, Frigerio L. 2019. Aquaporins influence seed dormancy and germination in response to stress. Plant, Cell & Environment 42:2325−39

    doi: 10.1111/pce.13561

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Zhao Y, Liu C, Sui J, Liang J, Ge J, et al. 2022. A wake-up call: signaling in regulating ornamental geophytes dormancy. Ornamental Plant Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2022-0008
    Zhao Y, Liu C, Sui J, Liang J, Ge J, et al. 2022. A wake-up call: signaling in regulating ornamental geophytes dormancy. Ornamental Plant Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2022-0008

Figures(3)  /  Tables(2)

Article Metrics

Article views(5694) PDF downloads(1265)

REVIEW   Open Access    

A wake-up call: signaling in regulating ornamental geophytes dormancy

Ornamental Plant Research  2 Article number: 8  (2022)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Ornamental geophytes are a group of important flowers worldwide. As perennial plants, geophytes go through several rounds of life cycle under seasonal climates. The dormant trait of underground modified organs in geophytes is critical for the process of storage, planting as well as breeding. Although the dormant physiology in geophytes is complex and largely unknown, several advancements have been achieved in this field. Here, we review the knowledge on the role of environmental factors, endogenous hormones, carbohydrates, and epigenetics in the regulation of geophytes dormancy release (GDR). We also discuss dormancy release (DR) methods and their roles in geophytes, including small molecular chemicals and wounding treatments.

    • Ornamental geophytes contain more than 800 different botanical genera which have different development biology and physiology. Morphologically, ornamental geophytes are characterized by modified organs (stem, root, leaf, or hypocotyl) grown underground and used as storage organs for plant growth and propagation, including tulip, lily, gladiolus, narcissus, hyacinth, freesia, dahlia, hippeastrum, and others. High land plants are evolutionally originated from marine organisms. During the Late Tertiary, the climatic zones were formed and the flora was dominated by woody angiosperms. Land plants have to evolve new survival strategies to cope with climate change. Some species obtained the ability to survive adverse periods by developing underground modified organs. Based on morphology, geophytes are classed into five groups: bulbs (the majority), tuber, corm, rhizome, and tuberous roots (Fig. 1). Geophytes are major players in the international flower industry and are widely used as cut flowers, potted plants, landscaping, and gardening plants. Most of the geophytes have a growth cassation period (called dormancy) except species that are originally from tropical areas, like Crinum asiaticum, Hippeastrum rutilum, and Curcuma alismatifolia Gagnep.

      Figure 1. 

      Photos to document the classification and morphological diversity of geophytes. (a) Dormant lily bulbs, (b) gladiolus corms, (c) Zantedeschia aethiopica tuber, (d) Canna indica rhizome, (e) Dahlia tuberous root. ab: apical bud; ax: axillary bud; bd: bud; bp: basal plate; br: branch root; cr: root crown; nd: node; rt: root; rz: rhizome; sc: scale; st: stem root; tr: tuberous root. The scale bar represents 1 cm.

      Dormancy is defined as the inability to initiate growth from meristems (and other organs and cells with the capacity to resume growth) under favorable conditions[1]. In bulbs, dormancy could be further divided into three types: i) endodormancy, which is regulated by internal factors. Geophytes in endodormancy are not able to grow even when placed under favorable conditions, e.g., gladiolus and lily; ii) ecodormancy, which is reduced growth response to external signals, like high/low temperature, short photoperiods, drought, and low oxygen. Once the external signals are removed, geophytes resume growth. Non-deciduous bulbs (hippeastrum) have ecodormant phenomena when planted in the temperate zone; iii) paradormancy, which is known as apical dominance. Axil bud growth is inhibited by internal signals[2,3].

      Dormancy is an essential trait in the horticultural industry. Pre-sprouting and deep dormancy are problems for crops and geophytes[4,5]. The occurrence of geophyte dormancy restricts the growth period and increases storage costs. On the other hand, the dormancy period allows the commercial handling, storage, and transportation of dormant organs world wide. Therefore, precise regulation of geophyte dormancy and GDR is required for effectively managing their production, shipping, and utilization.

      Recently, the topic of perennial woody bud dormancy has been reviewed[3,69]. However, few reviews regarding GDR are available. Although both geophytes dormancy and woody bud dormancy belong to bud dormancy or vegetative organ dormancy, several morphological and physiological differences may cause some special responses in geophytes: i) unlike dormant branch buds (e.g., poplar, pear, or apple tree), buds of geophytes are grown on modified storage organs (except tuberous roots where buds grow on the attached root crown) which contain much more starch, glycerol, or sugars than regular branch bud; ii) embedded in soil, dormant geophytes have a few different environmental conditions from regular branch bud, e.g., geophytes may have different strategies to sense the change of light.

      In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of GDR and review progress made in the area of environmental and hormone regulation, epigenetics, and miRNA. We also discuss strategies for GDR in the bulb flower industry and prospects for future studies.

    • For bulb plants, the temperature is the most important factor that affects geophytes dormancy (GD). Many geophytes in equatorial and subtropical zones, where there are relatively uniform environmental conditions, rarely have marked rest periods and continuously develop foliage leaves, such as Hippeastrum, Crinum asiaticum, and Haemanthus multiflorus Martyn.. However, when planted in marked climatic changes conditions, non-deciduous bulbs exhibit ecodormant phenomena, such as Hippeastrum and Clivia. Geophytes located in the Mediterranean go into dormancy in hot summers suggesting temperature is an essential factor controlling GD. When the temperature drops in the temperate zone, most bulb plants go into dormancy from autumn and are not suitable for plant growth, such as Begonia tuberhybrida, Tigridia pavonia, and Gladiolus hybridus. In the flower production chain, bulbs were stored at a relatively low temperature to extend ecodormant duration when undergoing long-distance shipping and forcing flowers throughout the year, such as tulip (storing at −2 to 9 °C), lily (at −2 to −1 °C), and gladiolus (at 4 °C).

      Temperature signaling serves as a critical environmental cue for GDR (Fig. 2). Besides, temperature signal interplays photoperiod signals in perennial dormant vegetative organs[10]. In recent years, a cold sensor (COLD1; CHILLING-TOLERANCE DIVERGENCE1) is identified in rice, which interacts with G protein to activate the Ca2+ channel for temperature sensing[11]. In temperature signaling, ICE1 (INDUCER OF CBF EXPRESSION), an MYC-like bHLH transcriptional activator, is induced by low temperature and promotes both seed dormancy in Arabidopsis and bud dormancy in poplar, pear, and apple[1214]. Besides, by using transcriptome analysis, ICE1 is suggested to be involved in bud dormancy of geophytes, like leafy spurge, gladiolus, and lily, suggesting its conserved role in regulating GD[1517]. ICE1 could bind to CBFs (C-REPEAT/DRE BINDING FACTORs) and active DAM (Dormancy-Associated MADS-Box) expression, promoting endodormancy[18,19]. DAM was firstly characterized in a peach mutant (evergrowing) which exhibits constant growth without dormancy[20]. DAM is a MADS-box protein and homologous to SVP (SHORT VEGETATIVE PHASE) in Arabidopsis, which binds the CArG motif of the FT (FLOWER LOCUS T) promoter and directly inhibits FT expression[21]. FT has been well characterized in perennial bud dormancy that it plays a positive role in bud dormancy release, like Gentian and poplar[22,23]. DAM is involved in regulating bud dormancy of trees by repressing GA biosynthesis and cell division, and promoting callose accumulation near plasmodesmata (PD)[24].

      Figure 2. 

      Biochemical and physiological processes occur during the whole process of dormancy in geophytes. In autumn, low temperature and short days induce endogenous ABA and inhibit CKs and GA. Besides, soluble sugars are decreased in shoots along with blocked PD and slow cell division. During the winter, long-term cold treatment contributes to decreasing ABA content in dormant organs and promoting GA, CKs, and soluble sugars. Meanwhile, callose around the PD is degraded which helps to active cell communication and cell division in buds. When the temperature and light are suitable for corm sprouting, ABA is continuously decreased and soluble sugars are used for plant growth. CDR: corm dormancy release; DR: Dormancy release; LD: Long day; LT: low temperature; SD: short day.

      Besides ICE1, ambient temperature is also sensed by phytochrome B (phyB) in Arabidopsis[25]. The active phyB is involved in plant growth and development including dormancy[24,26]. The photoconversion between Pr and Pfr enables the connection of the environmental cues with morphological reactions or plant behaviors[24]. It is possible that phyB can also regulate GDR when soil temperature changes, even if there is no light.

      In the actual planting of geophytes, to accelerate GDR, methods like warm baths and cold storage are widely used[27]. However, the mechanism of warm baths for geophytes is less known, compared to cold storage.

    • Light is another important environmental factor affecting GD and GDR mainly by its light quality, quantity, and duration. In autumn, before the temperature decreases dramatically, light duration is much shorter than in the summer (Fig. 2). Plants can sense light changes with sensors, e.g., phyA, phyB, CRY1, and CRY2[28,29]. Light participates in dormancy induction of geophytes, however, it might have a weaker effect on GDR compared to temperature. Because dormant geophytes were imbibed in the soil naturally.

      It has been shown that different light wavelength has different effects on plant development including vegetative growth, flowering, and dormancy[30]. Light with a specific wavelength is recognized by a certain light sensor[30]. ULTRAVIOLET B RESISTANCE 8 (UVR8) senses UVB light (280−315nm); Cryptochrome (cry), phototropin (phot), ZEITLUPE (ZTL), and phytochrome (phy) can sense light with 315−500 nm wavelength; in addition, phytochrome can sense red and far-red light[31]. phyA is active in darkness (the very low fluence response; VLFR) and the R/FR high irradiance response (R/FR‐HIR) while it maintains low levels in the white light. phyB is abundant and stable under white and red light. There are two forms of phyB in plants: one is Pr (inactive form) and the other is Pfr (active form). Pr is converted into Pfr by absorbing R light while Pfr is converted into Pr by absorbing FR light[32]. In the light response, phyA and phyB inhibit PIFs (PHYTOCHROME‐INTERACTING FACTORS) and further regulate cell division and cell elongation[33,34]. Although there is limited research about light-regulated GDR, several studies have shed light on light-regulated bud and seed dormancy[33,35]. In Populus, the phyB-PIF8 module responds to the light changes and controls seasonal growth cessation and bud break by cell division[33]. In Arabidopsis seeds, the phyB-PIF1 module mediates seed dormancy and germination by regulating the antagonism between GA and ABA metabolism[35]. In barely, white light and blue light had dramatically stimulation of HvNCED1 expression dry dormant seed to increase the ABA content to maintain the dormancy[36]. Moreover, compared with the monochromatic photoreceptors, multiple photoreceptors, i.e., the combination of blue and green light photoreceptors, play a more efficient role in the maintenance of dormancy in imbibed seeds of Lolium rigidum[37].

      In addition, light quantity and duration control GDR in species such as lily, potato, Anemone coronaria, and Lotus[3841]. In Easter lily, dormancy and vernalization could be achieved by combining long-day photoperiods and cold treatment, which can be technically replaced by each other equally on a week-for-week basis[42]. For most winter dormant geophytes, short day (SD) conditions result in growth cessation and endodormancy, e.g., Gladiolus, Asiatic lily, Hosta plantaginea[27]. SD is sensed by phytochromes in plants and mediates endodormancy by regulating CONSTANS (CO)/FT expression[24]. In addition, SD also induced endogenous ABA levels by stimulating DAM expression[24].

    • Hormones are the most effective regulators in regulating plant growth and development as well as dormancy[24]. It is well known that ABA is the master hormone in the whole process of GD (Fig. 3), including dormant induction, maintenance, and release[24]. We have discussed the mechanism in our previous review, containing the interplay between ABA and environmental factors, hormones, sugars, or epigenetics[24]. In Brief, ABA is involved in dormancy by repressing cell division, decreasing energy transition, blocking cell communication via PD, and slowing down the transcription and translation of genes.

      Figure 3. 

      The interplay among hormones and carbohydrates in regulating GDR. During GDR, ABA is the master hormone that could delay dormancy release by repressing cell division, blocking cell communication via callose, and inhibiting the biosynthesis of DNA, RNA, and protein by releasing SnRK1. Other hormones like GA, CKs, KARs, and ETH could interplay with ABA via transcription factors. A solid line represents the direct effect, and a dashed line represents the indirect effect. The interplay is summarized from different species. ABA: abscisic acid; ABI5: ABA INSENSITIVE 5; ACC: 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid; AIL1: AINTEGUMENTA-like 1; ARR: RESPONSE REGULATOR 1; CALS1: CALLOSE SYNTHASE 1; CKs: cytokinins; CYP707A: CYTOCHROME P450, FAMILY 707, SUBFAMILY A; CYCD: D type CYCLINS; DAM: Dormancy-Associated MADS-Box; DELLA: aspartic acid–glutamic acid–leucine–leucine–alanine; EBB3: EARLY BUD-BREAK 3; ETH: ethylene; ETR1: Ethylene Receptor 1; FT: FLOWER LOCUS T; GA: Gibberellic acid; GA2ox1: Gibberellin 2-Oxidase 1; GA20ox1: Gibberellin 20-Oxidase 1; GA3ox1: Gibberellin 3-Oxidase 1; IPT: ISOPENTENYL TRANSFERASE; KARs: Karrikins; KAI2: KARRIKIN-INSENSITIVE 2; LAP1: Like- APETALA 1; NAC: NAM, ATAF, CUC; NCED: 9-CIS-EPOXYCAROTENOID DIOXYGENASE; PP2C: Protein phosphatase 2C; SnRK1/2: SNF1-related protein kinase 1; TCP: Teosinte Branched Cyldoeia/PCF; TOR1: Target of Rapamycin; SMXL2: SMAX1-LIKE.

    • For several geophytes, GA is also considered an essential hormone in promoting GDR (Fig. 3), e.g., tulip, Oriental lily, and Fritillaria meleagris[4345]. However, it is not always the case in Gladiolus, Polianthes tuberosa, and others[5,46].

      During natural GDR, endogenous GA is induced by long-term cold exposure and geophytes are ready to sprout when spring arrives[27]. During bud dormancy release, chilling repressed SVL expression, and thus up-regulates the transcript of SVL'S target genes, like GA20ox[47]. Increased GA could be an antagonist to ABA and bud dormancy release by promoting cell division, soluble sugar content, energy metabolism, and reopening plasmodesmata communication[24,48,49]. Negative regulators in GA signaling, DELLA proteins, are degraded along with increased GA content during bud dormancy release in tree peony and Japanese apricot[50,51].

    • In geophytes, cytokinins (CKs) turn out to be an efficient hormone to break endodormancy and paradormancy (axillary bud dormancy), e.g., Gladiolus, Zantedeschia, Narcissus, and Fritillaria meleagris[17,45,52,53]. Endogenous CKs are stimulated by chilling and play a positive role in GDR (Fig. 3).

      During GDR, CKs biosynthesis genes including isopentenyl transferase (IPT) and CYP735As (CYTOCHROME P450, FAMILY 735, SUBFAMILY As) are active while CKs inactive pathway is inhibited, such as CKP1 (CYTOKININ RIBOSIDE PHOSPHORYLASE1)[17,54]. Silencing either of these genes results in a short dormant period in Gladiolus corm and potato tuber[17,55]. The functions of CKs are as follows: 1) promoting cell proliferation and division via cell cyclin genes. In Gladiolus, accumulated CKs promote the transcripts of CYCLIN genes[2]. In potato tubers, dormant cells are arrested at the G1 cell stage, and CYCLIN D members are involved in active this process[55]; 2) enhancing secondary PD formation and PD transport in shoot meristem[56,57]. Silencing CK receptor genes (AHK3 and AHK4) reduces PD transport[57]; 3) antagonizing ABA during GDR. CKs inhibit ABA biosynthesis and signaling transductions via transcription factors during GDR, including NAC83, SVL, and TCP19 (Teosinte Branched Cyldoeia/PCF) in geophytes[2,17,24].

    • Ethylene is a small molecular gaseous hormone and several research articles have shown that it is involved in GDR in onion and Liatris, among others (Fig. 3)[58,59]. Similar to geophytes, in birch, ethylene is induced under SD conditions and inhibits cell division in shoot meristem which further contributes to bud dormancy[60]. Mutating ethylene response (ETHYLENE RESPONSE1) results in decreasing response to SD and delayed endodormancy in birch as ABA accumulation and signal transduction are abolished in etr1 mutant[60]. In chrysanthemum, ethylene is induced by cold temperatures and triggers growth cessation and dormancy. The etr1 mutant in Chrysanthemum is insensitive to ethylene and has a delayed dormancy phenotype[61]. In onion, exogenous ethylene upregulates ABA biosynthesis and delays bulb dormancy[58].

      However, the role of ethylene on GDR is various when the situation or species changes. In Gladiolus, the ethylene-releasing compound (chloroethane-phosphonic acid; CEPA) promotes the sprouting of dormant cormels but inhibits the sprouting of non-dormant cormels[62]. In freesia, ethylene exposure time and repeat times affect the accelerated speed of corm dormancy release[63]. The underlying mechanism still needs to be investigated.

    • Smoke has been used to break dormancy in geophytes since the 1990s, such as freesia and Gladiolus[27,64]. Moreover, smoke is a broadly effective stimulant that enhances the germination of approximately 1200 species in more than 80 genera[65]. Karrikins (KARs) are a group of chemicals that are defined as a kind of plant hormone found in the smoke of burning plant materials[65]. Karrikinolide (butene lactone, 3-methyl-2H-furan[2,3-c]pyrone, KAR1) was first identified in 2003 and characterized as the most effective and abundant germination stimulant among all KARs[66,67]. Although there is no direct evidence that shows KARs promote GDR whereas it seems that KARs possibly have a conserved role in the seed germination of crops and weeds[68].

      KARs trigger the association of KAI2 (KAR receptor) with SMXL2 (SMAX1-LIKE) and MAX2 (MORE AXILLARY GROWTH2), leading to ubiquitination and degradation of SMXL2, and further promoting seed dormancy release[68]. KAI2 can serve as an environmental sensor or integrator of environmental signals (light, temperature, water, and nutrients), to modulate seed dormancy via the balance of ABA and GA[69]. In seeds, KAR1 promotes seed dormancy release by increasing endogenous GA and repressing endogenous ABA (Fig. 3)[65,70].

    • Carbohydrates serve as energy substances for cell activities in plants and involve almost the whole plant life cycle including dormancy and growth. It includes soluble sugars (e.g., glucose, fructose, and sucrose) and non-soluble sugars like starch. Those carbohydrates can be transformed with each other through various biochemical metabolism. Finally, all carbohydrates can provide energy (ATP and NADH) for plants by glycolysis[71].

      For geophytes, the dormant organs are sink organs and are enriched in carbohydrates. During bulb dormancy release by cold treatment, polysaccharides tend to be broken into oligosaccharides or monosaccharides that could be used to maintain the development and growth of plants[7274]. In lily or tulip, starch is degraded into small molecular sugars and cold contributes to the increase of fructose, glucose, fucose, mannose, altrose, and so on which could be later largely used for bud development at the end of bulb dormancy[7577]. In this process, several starch-degrading enzymes are involved, e.g., α-amylase, isoamylase, β-amylase, and α-glucosidase[78]. Moreover, in geophytes, accumulated sugars have to be transported by sugar transporters and PD, and then downloads to buds where sugars could be used as energy resources for cell division and elongation[79]. Endogenous ABA could repress the mobility and content of soluble sugars while GA plays the opposite role in geophyte dormant buds[24,48,79]. Although multiple research has shown the correlation between GDR and sugars, there is yet no genetic evidence.

      Sucrose not only supports energy to plant development but also integrates plant development by acting as a signal molecular[24]. Sucrose is hydrolyzed into fructose, glucose, and uridine diphosphate glucose by invertases (INV) and sucrose synthase (SUS), respectively, and further phosphorylated by hexokinase (HXK1) to generate glucose-6-phosphate (Glc6P), resulting in trehalose-6-phosphate (T6P) and Glc1P[80]. T6P and Glc1P have conserved functions among plants that are involved in energy supply and signal transduction[80]. Sugar metabolic and signaling pathways integrate endogenous phytohormone signals as well as environmental signals (light, temperature, water, and nutrients) and further regulate or balance plant development[24,80]. HXK1 and REGULATOR OF G-PROTEIN SIGNALING 1 (RGS1) directly sense glucose, and SUS is a potential sucrose sensor[80]. In addition, Sucrose Non-Fermenting Related Protein Kinase 1 (SnRK1) and Target of Rapamycin (TOR) can sense energy status (Fig. 3)[24]. TOR is a growth activator and promotes mRNA translation and cell division by phosphorylating the mTOR Substrate S6 Kinase 1 (S6K1) when in a high energy state (e.g., high T6P, G1P, and G6P)[24]. But when in a low energy state, SnRK1 is active and can inhibit the TOR's activity by direct phosphorylation[24]. Modifying the transcriptional levels of SnRK1 and T6P in potatoes significantly affects the tuber's dormancy trait[81].

    • Epigenetics refers to the reversible and heritable changes in gene function without changing the DNA sequence. In plants, the main epigenetic regulation mechanisms include DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and microRNAs (miRNAs)[82]. Although several reviews suggested that epigenetic regulations are involved in GDR, limited genetic evidence supports these postulates due to lack of efficient genetic transformations for GDR[24,82].

    • Histone modification is one of the most important epigenetic modifications in plants, which fine-tunes gene expression during plant development transitions by changing chromatin structure, and mainly includes acetylation, methylation, and ubiquitylation (Table 1)[24]. During DR in lily bulbs, genes related to histone modifications are changed dramatically, a similar tendency occurs in bud and seed dormancy[24,83,84]. During endodormancy release in Pyrus pyrifolia, H3K4me3 (H3 lysine 4 trimethylation) level at DAM locus is reduced[85]. Meanwhile, H3K27me3 is remarkably enriched at DAM loci[86]. In poplar, a negative regulator of bud dormancy, EEB3 (EARLY BUD BREAK3) is repressed in its transcript level by H3K27me3 when buds are in dormant states, and further extends the cell cycles in the shoot meristem[87]. Histone acetylation is also involved in GDR. In potato tubers, histone acetylation levels of histone H4, H3.1/3.2 are increased when GDR[88]. As it is well known that genes in pathways of flowering, vernalization, and ABA are proven to be involved in GDR, here, we summarize some histone modifications at these loci in Arabidopsis (Table 1). It is clear that GDR is regulated by histone modification but the mechanism remains unknown in geophytes.

      Table 1.  Dormancy associated genes regulated by epigenetics.

      Modification typeRegulation factors*Functional class*Target genes*References
      Chromatin remodeling complexesBRMSWI2/SNF2-likeFT, CO, SOC1[91]
      Chromatin remodeling complexesEBSBAH and PHD domain-containing proteinFT[93]
      HeterochromatinLHP1HP1 homologueFT[91]
      Histone deacetylationFLDHomologous to a subunit of histone deacetylase complexesFLC[91]
      Histone deacetylationFVEPutative subunit of histone deacetylase complexFLC[91]
      Histone monoubiquitinationHUB1/2E3 homologsFLC[94]
      Histone methylationMRG1/2H3K36me3FT[95]
      Histone methylationVRN1/2H3k27me3FLC, FT[91,96]
      Histone demethylationJMJ30Histone demethylaseSnRK2.8[97]
      DNA methylationMET1Maintenance CpNpG methyltransferaseFLC[91]
      * BAH: bromo-adjacent homology; BRM: BRAHMA; CO: CONSTANS; EBS: EARLY BOLTING IN SHORT DAYS; FLC: FLOWER LOCUS C; FLD: FLOWER LOCUS D; FT: FLOWER LOCUS T; FVE: FLOWER LOCUS VE; HUB: HISTONE MONO-UBIQUITINATION; JMJ30: JUMONJI C DOMAIN-CONTAINING PROTEIN 30; LHP1: LIKE HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN; MET1: METHYLTRANSFERASE 1; MRG: MORF RELATED GENE 1; PHD: Plant homeodomain; SnRK: SNF1-related protein kinase 1; SOC1: SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CO 1; SWI2/SNF2: SWITCHING2/ SUCROSE NONFERMENTING; VRN: VERNALIZATION.
    • In plants, DNA methylation occurs at cytosines in all sequence content (CG, CHH, and CHG)[89]. DNA METHYLTRANSFERASE 1 (MET1), CHROMOMETHYLTRANSFERASE2 (CMT2), and CMT3 are responsible for the maintenance of CG, CHH, and CHG methylation, respectively[89]. Low-temperature-induced GDR in lily bulbs and DNA demethylation is increased, which contributes to the cell division in shoot meristems[90]. In Arabidopsis, DNA methylation could regulate the vernalization gene (FLC) which is tightly controlled during the transition stage (Table 1)[91,92]. Currently, research about DNA methylation in GDR is less illustrated.

    • MicroRNA (miRNA) is a special class of small RNAs (sRNAs) with a length of about 19 to 24 nucleotides in length which guide the post-transcriptional silencing of target genes with high complement to the miRNA[98]. In plants, miRNAs are involved in all aspects of plant development and transition stages from growth to dormancy, cell proliferation to differentiation, and vegetative to reproductive growth[99]. Besides, hormone signaling and environmental signals could be mediated by miRNAs, e.g., miRNA390 and miRNA319 mediate auxin signaling and low-temperature signaling by targeting ARF2 (AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR2) and TCP1, respectively[99,100]. It is well known that miRNA-target gene modules are conserved, such as miR156/157-SPL, miR160-ARF, miR172-AP2, miR319-TCP, and miR390-TAS3 (ta-siRNAs act on ARF)[98]. But some conserved miRNAs also have gained unique targets in different species throughout the evaluation process, like miRNA396 in moss and miRNA390 in Physcomitrella patens[98].

      Although much process has been achieved on perennial vegetative bud dormancy by RNA sequencing techniques in recent years, the genetic evidence is still missing (Table 2). In Japanese apricot (Prunus mume Sieb. et Zucc.), miR169 regulates the NF-Y complex to activate the bud dormant release[101]. In Lilium pumilum, several miRNAs were identified to be potentially involved in bulb dormancy, e.g., miR159, miR160, mi166, miR168 and miR396[90]. In apple, miR159 represses the transcriptional level of MdMYB33 and MdMYB65 and mediates bud dormancy release by balancing endogenous ABA homeostasis[102]. Other dormancy-associated genes, like DAM and CDPK1, are also reported to be regulated by miR6390 and miR390, respectively[103,104].

      Table 2.  miRNA related to bud dormancy.

      miRNATargets*SpeciesFunctionReference
      miR156SPLPaeonia suffruticosaBud dormancy release[105]
      miR159MdMYB33 and MdMYB65Malus domesticaABA homeostasis[102]
      miR159MYB/TCPLilium pumilumBulb dormancy release[90]
      miR160ARFLilium pumilumBulb dormancy release[90]
      miR169HAP2Populus tremuloidesVegetative bud dormancy[106]
      miR169NF-YAPrunus mumeBud dormancy release[101]
      miR172AP2Paeonia suffruticosaBud dormancy release[105]
      miR319cTCP2Camellia sinensisApical bud burst[107]
      miR390TAS3Pyrus pyrifoliaEndodormancy release[108]
      miR390CDPK1Solanum tuberosumTuber dormancy[104]
      miR6390DAMPyrus pyrifoliaDormancy
      transition
      [103]
      * AP: APETALA; ARF: AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR; CDPK: CALCIUM-DEPENDENT PROTEIN KINASE; DAM: DORMANCY-ASSOCIATED MADS-BOX; HAP: HAPLESS; MYB: MYELOBLASTOSIS; NF-YA: Nuclear Transcription Factor Y Subunit Alpha; SPL: SQUAMOSA PROMOTER BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE; TAS: TRANS-ACTING SIRNA3; TCP: TEOSINTE BRANCHED1/CYCLOIDEA/PCF.
    • Nitric oxide (NO) is reported to be involved in various abiotic and biotic stress and plant physiology[109,110]. In potatoes, NO mediates tuber dormancy release and sprouting by regulating ABA metabolism that exogenous NO dramatically stimulates the expression of StCYP707A1 and inhibits the expression of StNCED1[111]. Although NO is accumulated in buds during dormancy release in grapevine and peach, the role of NO in GDR requires further investigation[112,113].

    • Similar to NO, bromoethane accelerates tuber dormancy release in potato[114]. After bromoethane treatments, ABA catabolic genes (StCYP707A1, StCYP707A2 and StCYP707A3) were up-regulated while ABA biosynthesis genes (StNCED1, StNCED2 and ZEP family genes) were down-regulated, and resulted in a low ABA content that accelerated dormancy release[115].

    • In some geophytes, glycerol is enriched in dormant storage organs, such as Easter lily and yam[75,116]. During GDR in lily, glycerol content is decreased in scales along with dramatic changes in glycerol-related genes. Moreover, exogenous glycerol treatment significantly enhances NCED expression and delays dormancy release as well as flower transition[75]. However, the effect of glycerol on dormancy release in other geophytes is less documented.

    • Wounding treatments are stress signals which can stimulate a series of complex physiological and biochemical reactions in plants, regulating DNA synthesis, respiration rates and wound-induced hormones (e.g., ethylene and ABA)[117]. Wounding treatments by cutting, pruning, stabbing, etc, have been found to be practical ways to promote the dormancy release in geophytes (onion and potato), vine buds (grapevine), and seeds (Arabidopsis)[113,118120].

      The wounding treatments significantly promote GDR by increasing cell respiration in dormant organs. The wounding respiration is in collaboration with wound healing reactions and promotes callus formation, lignin, and xanthan[121]. Accompanied by carbohydrate catabolism, respiration activates glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathways and provides energy for dormancy release[122]. In potatoes, respiration stimulates starch glycolysis and leads to faster tuberous sprouting and thick sprouts[122,123].

      Due to the wounding treatments, phytohormone levels (like ethylene and ABA) are changed which further affects the speed of dormancy release. Wound-induced ethylene is well documented and that the ethylene precursor ACC is accumulated in injured tissues[124]. Elevated ethylene could regulate GDR as described above. Wounding treatments can decrease endogenous ABA in potato tubers[125]. A similar observation occurs in dormant corms in Gladiolus where cutting treatment also represses the expression of NCED and ABA content. But regulating networks between the wounding signal and ABA/ ethylene are still unclear.

      Wounding treatments also increase the capacity of dormant tissues to meet with oxygen and water and cause early sprouting. These methods are technically useful for seeds with compact seed coats or pericarp-testa like lotus and celery seeds. Heme-binding proteins can function as sensors for oxygen and nitric oxide, which can directly repress the activity of DOG1 (DELAY OF GERMINATION) protein and further release seed dormancy[89]. Once water uptake has occurred, the water potential thresholds for radical were changed, resulting in germination[126]. The detailed mechanism of wounding-induced seed germination is well documented but is not the main focus of the current review.

    • In nature, plants have to make changes to adapt to harsh environmental conditions, and varieties of dormancy have evolved for different organs, like seed dormancy, bud dormancy, and geophyte dormancy. Here, we mainly summarize recent progress on how geophytes sense and respond to environmental factors (temperature and light) during GDR, the effects of endogenous hormones, carbohydrates, and epigenetics on GDR, and the mechanism of some small molecular and wounding treatments on GDR.

      Despite our growing knowledge of seed dormancy in model plants, e.g., Arabidopsis, rice, and wheat, many secrets remain to be decoded in the field of geophytes. Currently, we cannot find an accurate physiological symbol to divide the dormancy and the start point of dormancy release. In lily, it is suggested that the inflection point of soluble sugars refers to the start point of dormancy release[78]. However, we lack the necessary evidence and has not been proven in other geophytes. Due to large genome sizes (~1 Gb to 50 Gb), long juvenile periods, and low genetic transformant efficiencies for geophytes, the regulating network for GDR is largely unclear. Compared with seed dormancy, developing gene markers of the dormant trait in geophytes is lacking. With the rapid advance of high-throughput omics sequencing (genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, ChIP-seq, and others) and achievements of transgenic strategy in geophytes, it will generate a broad and detailed picture of geophyte dormancy which contributes to distinguishing geophyte dormancy with other types of dormancy on the aspect of plant evolution, response to environmental factors, changes in specific cells (metabolism, epigenetics, transcripts) and molecular breeding for new cultivars of geophytes with various degrees of dormancy.

      • We apologize for not citing many references due to space limitations. We thank Dr. Hongzhi Wu (Yunnan Agricultural University) for supporting the picture of Zantedeschia hybrida Spr. This work was funded by Beijing Natural Science Foundation (6212012 to J.W.), National Natural Science Foundation projects (grants 3217180532; 31701952 to J.W. and 31902047 to J.J.S.), Construction of Beijing Science and Technology Innovation and Service Capacity in Top Subjects (CEFF- PXM2019_014207_000032), Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (2008085MC79 to J.J.S.), The 2115 Talent Development Program of China Agricultural University and 111 Project of the Ministry of Education (B17043).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • # These authors contributed equally: Yajie Zhao, Chang Liu, Juanjuan Sui

      • Copyright: © 2022 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (3)  Table (2) References (126)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Zhao Y, Liu C, Sui J, Liang J, Ge J, et al. 2022. A wake-up call: signaling in regulating ornamental geophytes dormancy. Ornamental Plant Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2022-0008
    Zhao Y, Liu C, Sui J, Liang J, Ge J, et al. 2022. A wake-up call: signaling in regulating ornamental geophytes dormancy. Ornamental Plant Research 2:8 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2022-0008

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return