-
Seeds were collected from the natural forest of Jinggangshan (Jiangxi province, China, named JX), and the collected seeds were treated using the method of Fang et al.[17]. After stratification treatment for five months, the germinated seedlings were first transplanted into cultivation bags (10.8 cm in diameter and 14.5 cm in height) filled with a medium (a mixture of nutritional soil: perlite (10:1, g/g)) and then cultured in an incubation room at 15 ± 2 °C (day) and 10 ± 2 °C (night), with natural light environment (about 15 ± 1 h photoperiod). Each bag contained one plant.
Seedlings with even growth (height, marked H1) were selected and exposed to different shading levels in a plastic greenhouse under natural condition. Shade nets were set at 1.8 m height from the ground with different layers of shade net: no layer of shade net (marked SH0, as control, 60%–70% of full sunlight), one layer of shade net (marked SH1, 30%–40% of full sunlight) and two layers of shade net (marked SH2, 10%–20% of full sunlight); and plastic sheeting were not fitted around the plastic greenhouse. Soil water capacity was maintained at 50%–60%, and the lost water was supplemented at approximately 6:00 AM every day, and the position of the seedling was adjusted every 5 d. The experiment was established in a randomized complete block design, and each shading treatment contained three replicates and 15 seedlings per replicate.
After 100 d of shading treatment (from June to September), the surviving seedlings were observed and investigated for growth analysis. Three seedlings were randomly selected and separated into leaves, shoots, and roots to determine and analyze their water content (WC) and mineral content, and the fourth compound leaf from the top to bottom with the same orientation were obtained from other seedlings and then immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen to determine and analyze their total soluble sugar (TSS) content, antioxidant enzyme activity, chlorophyll content and malondialdehyde (MDA) content.
Assessment of growth performances
-
Seedling height (the final height, marked H2), ground diameter (DH), and leaf area (LA) of the seedlings under each shading treatment were measured. After washing, three parts of seedling were weighed (marked FW), and then heated at 105 °C for 15 min and dried to a constant weight (marked DW) at 85 °C. Finally, the growth and biomass of seedlings were assessed and the growth index was calculated according to the method described by Feng et al.[25].
Measurement of physiological characteristics
Determination of water content
-
Based on the measurement of FW and DW, WC was calculated with the formula 1[26]:
$ \mathrm{W}\mathrm{C}\;\left({\text{%}}\right)\;=\frac{\mathrm{F}\mathrm{W}-\mathrm{D}\mathrm{W}}{\mathrm{F}\mathrm{W}}\times 100$ (1) Extraction and determination of mineral content
-
According to the method described by Feng et al.[25], dried samples were digested and extraction was obtained using the electric-heating digestion method by the Block Digestion System (AIM600, Clontarf Qld 4019 Australia), then the mineral content was measured using Inductively Coupled Plasma - Optical Emission Spectrometer (ICP-OES, optima 7000DV, PerkinElmer Co., USA), and finally the mineral content (potassium (K), calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na)) and translocation factor (TF) were calculated according to Eqns 2 & 3:
$ \mathrm{C}\;\left(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{g}/\mathrm{g}\right)\;=\frac{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{m}\times \mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{D}\mathrm{W}} $ (2) $ \mathrm{T}\mathrm{F}=\frac{\mathrm{C}_{\mathrm{s}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}}+\mathrm{C}_{\mathrm{l}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{f}}}{\mathrm{C}_{\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{t}}}$ (3) Cm is the mineral content measured by ICP-OES, mg/L; V is the total volume of extraction, L; DW is the dried weight of the sample, g; Cshoot, Cleaf, and Croot are the mineral content in the shoots, leaves and roots, respectively.
Extraction and determination of total soluble sugar content
-
Total soluble sugar (TSS) was extracted and measured according to the method described by Li[27]. First, fresh leaves were ground and added to 10 mL distilled water, and then heated at 100 °C for 30 min, finally filtered to a volume of 25 mL. Next, 0.5 mL extraction was added to a mixture of 1.5 mL of distilled water, 0.5 mL of Anthrone and ethyl acetate mixture (Anthrone:ethyl acetate = 1:50 g/mL) and 5 mL of H2SO4, and then kept at 100 °C for 1 min. Finally, the absorbance was measured at 630 nm using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd, China). TSS content was calculated using Eqn 4:
$ \mathrm{C}\;\left({\text{%}}\right)\;=\frac{\mathrm{C}\mathrm{s}\times \mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{W}\times 0.5\times 1000000}\times 100 $ (4) Cs was obtained from the standard curve in which sugar was used as the standard curve, mg/L; V is the total volume of extraction, mL; W indicates the fresh weight of the sample, g.
Extraction and determination of chlorophyll content
-
Chlorophyll content was determined using the method explained by Li[27]. Briefly, fresh leaves were ground and added to 10 mL 80% acetone, and then filtered to a volume of 25 mL. Then, the absorbance was measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd, China) at 470 nm (A470), 663 nm (A663) and 645 nm (A645). Finally, chlorophyll content and carotenoid content were calculated using Eqns 5, 6, 7 & 8 respectively.
$ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{a}=13.95\mathrm{A}_{665}-6.88\mathrm{A}_{649} $ (5) $ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{b}=24.96\mathrm{A}_{649}-7.32\mathrm{A}_{665} $ (6) $ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{x}.\mathrm{c}=\frac{1000\mathrm{A}_{470}-2.05\mathrm{C}\mathrm{a}-114.8\mathrm{C}\mathrm{b}}{245} $ (7) $ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{h}\mathrm{y}\mathrm{l}\mathrm{l}\;\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t} (mg/g)=\frac{\left(\mathrm{C}\mathrm{a}+\mathrm{C}\mathrm{b}\right)\times \mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{W}} $ (8) V is the total volume of extraction, mL; W indicates the fresh weight of the sample, g.
Extraction and determination of MDA content
-
MDA content was extracted from fresh leaves using an improved thiobarbituric acid-malondialdehyde (TBA-MDA) assay method[27], and then measured at 450 nm, 532 nm and 600 nm by a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd, China), respectively. Finally, MDA content was calculated using Eqns 9 & 10, respectively:
$ \mathrm{C}\;\left(\frac{\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{L}}{\mathrm{L}}\right)\;=6.45\left(\mathrm{A}_{532}-\mathrm{A}_{600}\right)-0.56\mathrm{A}_{450}$ (9) $ \mathrm{M}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{A}\;\mathrm{c}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{t}\;(\mathrm{u}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{L}/\mathrm{g})\;=\frac{\mathrm{C}\times \mathrm{V}}{\mathrm{W}} $ (10) V is the total volume of extraction, L; W indicates the weight of the fresh sample, g.
Extraction and determination of antioxidant enzyme activity
-
Fresh leaves were ground and added to 15 mL 0.05 mol/L phosphate buffer (PBS, pH 7.8), then kept at 4 °C for 15 min, finally centrifuged at 4 °C, 11,000 ×g for 10 min (TGL-16M, Hunan Xiangyi Laboratory Instrument Development Co., Ltd, China). Enzyme extraction (labeled E) was obtained and antioxidant enzyme activity was immediately determined.
SOD activity was determined using the method explained by Li[27] with slight modifications. Reaction mixture including 0.1 mL enzyme extraction (labeled E1), 3.0 mL 0.05 mol/L PBS (pH 7.8), 0.6 mL 130 mol/L methionine, 0.6 mL 0.1 mmol/L ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid disodium, 0.4 mL distilled water, 0.6 mL 0.02 mmol/L riboflavin and 0.6 mL 0.75 mmol/L nitro-blue tetrazolium was reacted at 4,000 lx for 20 min, but the control was kept in the dark. After that, the absorbance was measured at 560 nm by a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd, China).
POD activity was measured according to the method described by Li[27] with slight modification. Reaction mixture containing 2.9 mL 0.05 mol/L PBS (pH 7.8), 1 mL 2% H2O2 (v/v), 1 mL 50 mmol/L guaiacol and 0.1 mL enzyme extraction (labeled E2) was heated at 34 °C for 3 min. Then, the absorbance was immediately measured at 470 nm, 6 times with an interval of 1 min by a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd, China).
Polyphenol oxidase (PPO) activity was determined using the method described by Li[27] with slight modification. Reaction mixture containing 3.5 mL 0.05 mol/L PBS (pH 7.8), 1 mL 0.1 mol/L catechol and 0.5 mL enzyme extraction (labeled E3) was heated at 37 °C for 10 min. Then, 2 mL 20% trichloroacetic acid (w/v) was quickly added to the reaction mixture and centrifuged at 4 °C, 11,000 ×g for 10 min (TGL-16M, Hunan Xiangyi Laboratory Instrument Development Co., Ltd, China). Finally, the absorbance was measured immediately at 420 nm, 6 times with an interval of 1 min by a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd, China).
CAT activity was measured using the method described by Li[27] with slight modification. Reaction mixture was prepared using 2 mL 0.05 mol/L PBS (pH 7.8), 0.5 mL 0.18% H2O2 (v/v), 1 mL distilled water and 0.5 mL enzyme extraction (labeled E4). The absorbance was immediately measured at 240 nm, 6 times with an interval of 1 min by a UV-visible spectrophotometer (TU-1900, Beijing Purkinje General Instrument Co., Ltd, China).
Antioxidant enzyme activity was calculated with the following equations:
$ \mathrm{S}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{D}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}\;\left(\mathrm{U}/\mathrm{g}\cdot\mathrm{F}\mathrm{W}\right)\;=\frac{\left(\rm{A}ck-\mathrm{A}e\right)\times \rm{V}e}{0.5\times \rm{A}ck\times \rm{W}\mathrm{ }\times \rm{V}\mathrm{e}1} $ (11) $ \mathrm{P}\mathrm{O}\mathrm{D}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}\;\left(\mathrm{U}/\mathrm{g}\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\right)\;=\frac{{\text△}\rm{D}470\times \rm{V}e}{0.01\times \rm{W}\times \rm{V}e2\times \mathrm{T}} $ (12) $ \mathrm{P}\mathrm{P}\mathrm{O}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}\;\left(\mathrm{U}/\mathrm{g}\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\right)\;=\frac{{\text{△}}\rm{D}420\times \mathrm{V}\mathrm{e}}{\left(0.01\times \rm{W}\times \rm{V}e3\times \mathrm{T}\right)} $ (13) $ \mathrm{C}\mathrm{A}\mathrm{T}\;\mathrm{a}\mathrm{c}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{v}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{t}\mathrm{y}\;\left(\mathrm{U}/\mathrm{g}\cdot\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{n}\right)\;=\frac{{\text{△}}\mathrm{D}240\times \rm{V}e}{0.1\times \mathrm{ }\rm{W}\times \rm{V}e4\times \mathrm{T}} $ (14) Ack and Ae are the absorbance of the control and samples at 560 nm, respectively;
is the change of absorbance measured at 470 nm;${\text{△}}{\rm D470} $ is the change of absorbance measured at 420 nm;${\text{△}}{\rm D420} $ is the change of absorbance measured at 240 nm; Ve is the total volume of E, mL; Ve is the total volume of E, mL; Ve1 is the volume of E1, mL; Ve2 is the volume of E2, mL; Ve3 is the volume of E3, mL; Ve4 is the volume of E4; T is the reaction time, min; W is the weight of fresh leaf, g.${\text{△}}{\rm D240} $ Data and statistical analysis
-
One-way analysis of variance was conducted to evaluate the effect of shading treatment on growth and physiological characteristics, followed by Tukey's Highly Significant Differences (HSD), and the standard error of differences between means was calculated with p set to 0.05. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics 18 version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Correlation analysis was performed to identify the relationship between the growth index of seedlings and physiological index using the software package Origin 9.1 (Northampton, MA01060, USA). Network analysis was performed using Gephi (version 0.9.2, WebAtlas, France) to analyze the correlation between various physiological index.
-
In the treatment without shade net (SH0, as a control), the survival rate of seedlings was 84.44%, and seedling growth was significantly inhibited. Specifically, seedlings had the lowest height and growth biomass. Leaves were seriously burnt, but RSR was the highest (Fig. 1, Table 1). Under shading conditions, the survival rate of seedlings increased significantly, but there was no difference under SH1 and under SH2. Seedling growth and biomass significantly increased with increasing layers of shade net. In particular, seedlings under SH2 showed favorable growth with the largest leaf area, highest plant height, and highest plant weight, but RSR decreased with increasing layers of shade net (Table 1, Fig. 1).
Figure 1.
Growth of Cyclocarya paliurus seedlings under different shading levels. (a), (c) Seedling growth in plastic greenhouse under three shading levels; (b), (d) seedling growth in plastic greenhouse under SH1 and SH0, respectively; SH0 indicates seedling growth with no shade net (about 60%−70% of full sunlight); SH1 indicates seedling growth with one layer of shade net (about 30%−40% of full sunlight); SH2 indicates seedling growth with two layers of shade net (about 10%−20% of full sunlight). Seedlings were treated in plastic greenhouses with different shading levels for 100 d (from June to September), and plastic sheeting was not fitted around the plastic greenhouse and the shade net was set at 1.8 m height from the ground.
Table 1. Variations in seedling growth of Cyclocarya paliurus with different shading treatments
Treatment Survival rate
(%)The fourth leaf area
(cm2)DH
(mm)The growth rate of stem
(cm/d)DM:FM
(g/plant)RSR SH0 84.44 ± 3.85b 3.46 ± 0.42c 1.48 ± 0.24c 0.02 ± 0c 4.04 ± 0.72b 0.70 ± 0.19a SH1 95.56 ± 3.85a 9.19 ± 1.045b 2.76 ± 0.42b 0.08 ± 0.02b 6.34 ± 2.79b 0.58 ± 0.13ab SH2 100 ± 0a 33.19 ± 3.09a 5.29 ± 0.76a 0.31 ± 0.03a 18.84 ± 3.72a 0.41 ± 0.08b SH0 means seedling growth with no shade net; SH1 means seedling grwoth with one layer of shade net; SH2 means seedling growth with two layers of shade net. Different letters (a,b,--) indicate significant differences between shading treatments by Tukey's Highly Significant Differences at p set to 0.05. DH represents ground diameter; DM:FM represents dry mass: fresh mass; RSR represents the ratio of underground weight to aboveground weight. Variation in water content (WC)
-
WC of seedlings under SH1 and SH2 was slightly higher than that under SH0, but no differences exist between SH0, SH1, and SH2 (Fig. 2a). However, WC varied in the three parts (root, shoot, and leaf) under different shading levels. Specifically, WC in the root increased, but WC in the shoot decreased with increasing layers of shade net, and no difference was observed between SH0, SH1, and SH2. WC in the leaf under SH1 and SH2 significantly increased by 12.54% and 12.78%, respectively, in comparison with that under SH0 (Fig. 2a).
Figure 2.
(a) Water content and (b) total soluble sugar content in Cyclocarya paliurus seedlings under different shading levels. SH0 indicates seedling growth with no shade net; SH1 indicates seedling growth with one layer of shade net; SH2 indicates seedling growth with two layers of shade net. * means significant differences (p < 0.05 according to Tukey's HSD) between SH0, SH1 and SH2.
Variation in total soluble sugar content
-
Leaves under SH2 showed the highest TSS content, TSS content under SH0 and SH1 decreased by 13.93% and 14.67%, respectively, but there was no difference between three shading levels (Fig. 2b).
Variation in chlorophyll content
-
Chlorophyll (Chl) content of leaves under SH2 was 2.52 times and 1.67 times higher than that under SH0 and SH1, respectively (Fig. 3a). Chl a content was much higher than Chl b content and carotenoid content, but both of them showed a similar trend (Fig. 3b, c, d).
Figure 3.
Chlorophyll content and carotenoid content in Cyclocarya paliurus leaves under different shading levels. (a) Chlorophyll content; (b) chlorophyll a content; (c) chlorophyll b content; and (d) carotenoid content. SH0 indicates seedling growth with no shade net; SH1 indicates seedling growth with one layer of shade net; SH2 indicates seedling growth with two layers of shade net. * means significant differences (p < 0.05 according to Tukey's HSD) between SH0, SH1 and SH2.
Variation in lipid peroxidation content
-
Under the three shading levels, MDA content in leaf under SH2 was the lowest, and its content under SH0 and SH1 significantly increased by 59.15% and 60.25%, respectively (Fig. 4). But there was no difference between under SH0 and SH1.
Figure 4.
MDA content in Cyclocarya paliurus leaves under different shading levels. SH0 indicates seedling growth with no shade net; SH1 indicates seedling growth with one layer of shade net; SH2 indicates seedling growth with two layers of shade net. * means significant differences (p < 0.05 according to Tukey's HSD) between SH0, SH1 and SH2.
Variation in mineral content
-
Four kinds of mineral (K, Ca, Mg, and Na) were detected in seedlings, and their contents were in the order of Ca>K>Mg>Na (Fig. 5a). The translation factor of the four minerals decreased with the increasing layers of shade net, and there was a significant difference between under SH0, SH1, and SH2 (Fig. 5b).
Figure 5.
Mineral contents in Cyclocarya paliurus seedling under different shading levels. (a) mineral contents in seedlings; (b) translocation factor; (c) K content; (d) Ca content; (e) Mg content; (f) Na content. SH0 indicates seedling growth with no shade net; SH1 indicates seedling growth with one layer of shade net; SH2 indicates seedling growth with two layers of shade net. * means significant differences (p < 0.05 according to Tukey's HSD) between SH0, SH1 and SH2.
K content of seedlings was significantly decreased with the increasing layers of shade net (Fig. 5a), K content under SH0 and SH1 was rich in the leaf (Fig. 5c). K content in the root under SH1 was higher than that under SH0 and SH2, but no change was observed between under SH0, SH1 and SH2. K content in the shoot and leaf decreased with increasing layers of shade net (Fig. 5c).
Ca content of seedlings under SH1 significantly decreased, but increased significantly under SH2 in comparison with that under SH0 (Fig. 5a). Ca content in the leaf was higher than that in the root and shoot (Fig. 5d). Ca content in the root and shoot had a similar trend with that in seedlings. Leaves showed a decreasing Ca content with increasing layers of shade net.
Seedling under SH1 had the highest Mg content (Fig. 5a), Mg content was also rich in leaf. Mg content in the root slightly increased, but Mg content in the shoot and leaf significantly decreased with increasing layers of shade net (Fig. 5e).
Na content of seedlings reached significant difference under SH2 (Fig. 5a), Na content in the root was higher than that in the leaf and in shoot. Na content in the root and shoot significantly increased, but decreased in the leaf with increasing layers of shade net (Fig. 5f).
Variation in antioxidant enzyme activity
-
Four kinds of antioxidant enzymes (SOD, PPO, POD, and CAT) were detected in the leaf and their activities were in the following order: SOD>PPO>POD>CAT (Fig. 6). However, their activities varied with different shading levels. Leaf under SH0 had the highest SOD activity, and SOD activity decreased significantly with increasing layers of shade net. The change of POD and CAT activities were similar to that of SOD activity. However, PPO activity increased significantly with increasing layers of shade net, and its activity under SH2 was 25.67 and 23.03 times higher than that under SH0 and SH1, respectively.
Figure 6.
Variations in antioxidant enzyme activities in Cyclocarya paliurus leaves under different shading levels. (a) CAT activity; (b) PPO activity; (c) POD activity; and (d) SOD activity. SH0 indicates seedling growth with no shade net; SH1 indicates seedling growth with one layer of shade net; SH2 indicates seedling growth with two layers of shade net. * means significant differences (p < 0.05 according to Tukey's HSD) between SH0, SH1 and SH2.
Correlation among parameters
-
The growth index of seedlings had positive or negative relationships with various physiological indices under three shading levels (Fig. 7a). And various relationships exist between them. For example, seedling height and leaf area had a negative relation with growth biomass (DM:FM, RSR); PPO activity had a significant positive relation with TSS and Chl content. Antioxidant enzyme activity (SOD, POD, CAT) had a positive relation with mineral content (K, Ca, Mg, Na); but physiological index had a negative relation with antioxidant enzyme activity and mineral content (Fig. 7b).
Figure 7.
(a) Correlation analysis and (b) network analysis between different studied factors. LA, DH, RH, DF, RSR indicates leaf area, ground diameter, the growth rate of shoot, the ratio of dry mass to fresh mass, the ratio of underground weight to aboveground weight, respectively; WC, TSS, Chl, PPO indicate water content, total soluble sugar content, Chlorophyll content, polyphenol oxidase activity;* represents significant differences (p < 0.05 according to Tukey's HSD) between SH0, SH1, and SH2.
antioxidant enzyme; mineral content; physiological index; MDA content. Blue line means a positive relation between each other; red line means a negative relation between each other. -
Cyclocarya paliurus seedlings were cultivated in a plastic greenhouse under three shading levels. The results showed that (1) shading conditions with two layers of shade net (SH2) improved the survival rate and growth of Cyclocarya paliurus seedlings, and seedlings significantly increased plant height, leaf area, and biomass accumulation; (2) in comparison with that under SH0 and SH1, chlorophyll content increased and MDA content reduced significantly under SH2, indicating that suitable shading conditions was beneficial to seedling growth and normal metabolism; and (3) the physiological responses of seedlings varied with shading levels and showed various correlation with seedling growth, indicating that mineral and antioxidant enzymes could coordinate to alleviate or protect seedling from damage under SH0 and SH1, and SOD was the main enzymatic mechanism.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Feng Y, Zhi L, Pan H, Chen Y, Xu J. 2023. Shade improves seedling quality of ornamental Cyclocarya species under plastic greenhouse cultivation. Ornamental Plant Research 3:13 doi: 10.48130/OPR-2023-0013
Shade improves seedling quality of ornamental Cyclocarya species under plastic greenhouse cultivation
- Received: 21 December 2022
- Accepted: 31 May 2023
- Published online: 29 June 2023
Abstract: Plastic greenhouse cultivation is a widespread and convenient way of cultivating high-quality seedlings, which are often damaged by higher temperatures during summer. Cyclocarya paliurus, a medical and ornamental species with low-quality seedlings, was investigated using three shading levels (treatment with no shade net (SH0), treatment with one layer of shade net (SH1), and treatment with two layers of shade net (SH2)). The growth and physiological responses of seedlings under plastic greenhouse cultivation were investigated from June to September. The results showed that the survival rate of seedlings reached 100%, and seedling growth and biomass were the best under SH2, with higher plant height and leaf area than that under other treatments. Water content of seedlings exhibit not difference between three shading levels, and leaves had the highest water content and total soluble sugar content. The chlorophyll content in the leaf increased, but malondialdehyde content decreased with increasing shading layers. Mineral content were in the following order: calcium > potassium > magnesium > sodium, and the translocation factor decreased with increasing shading layers. Antioxidant enzyme activities were in the following order: SOD > PPO > POD > CAT; their activities decreased with increasing shading layers, except for that of PPO. Various correlation existed between physiological response and seedling growth. Shade improved seedling quality through a series of physiological responses under plastic greenhouse conditions. This study provides a solid foundation for greenhouse cultivation of Cyclocarya species.
-
Key words:
- Cyclocarya paliurus /
- Shade level /
- Growth biomass /
- Physiological characteristics