-
Soils and nodules for this study were collected from the major soybean growing regions in the eastern, northern, and southern highlands, of Tanzania. In the southern highlands, the regions included were: Iringa, Njombe, Ruvuma, Songwe, Rukwa, and Mbeya. This zone is located between latitudes 7° and 11.5° S and longitudes 30° and 38° E with an elevation ranging from 302 to 2,925 meters above sea level (m.a.s.l.). Rainfall is unimodal falling in November to May with annual rainfall of 1,650 mm and dry periods ranging from June to September[25]. The mean annual temperature ranges from 7 to 32.2 °C. The eastern zone included Morogoro region which is located between latitudes 5° and 9° S and longitudes 35° and 38° E. The mean annual temperature ranges from 15 to 32 °C and the average annual rainfall is around 740 mm[26]. In the northern zone, Arusha and Kilimanjaro regions were included in the present study. The Arusha region lies between latitudes 1° and 4° S and longitudes 34° and 37° E with an average annual rainfall of 873 mm while the temperature ranges from 12.1 to 28.8 °C. The Kilimanjaro region lies between the latitudes 2° and 4° S and longitudes 36° and 38° E. The average annual rainfall in the Kilimanjaro region ranges from 700 mm to 2,000 mm and the temperature ranges from 12.5 to 27 °C. The site description of the sampled areas are presented in Fig. 1.
Soil sample collection and soil fertility evaluation
-
In each region, three representative districts were selected, three villages in each district, and one field with a history of using only organic manure, for at least three seasons, consecutively, were selected. The study sites and sampling location map was generated using QGIS 3.14.0 software (Fig. 2). Soil samples were taken from three spotted locations per field depending on the color of the soil because the area was too small (< one acre). For each spotted location, about 1 kg of soil sample was collected from a depth of 0−30 cm. One composite soil sample was prepared by mixing three soil samples, removing the roots and crumps. Prior to laboratory analysis, the soil was air-dried and sieved through 2 mm mesh.
Figure 2.
Map showing soil and nodules sampling fields in different regions of Tanzania (SHZ-Southern Highland Zone, EZ-Eastern Zone and NZ-Northern Zone).
The soil texture was determined using the hydrometer method. Total nitrogen was determined by the micro-Kjeldahl digestion-distillation method. Cation exchange capacity was measured at pH 7 with 1 M Ammonium Acetate (NH4OAc) and exchangeable cations K+ and Na+ were determined by flame photometer while, Ca2+ and Mg2+ as well as micronutrients Iron (Fe), Copper (Cu), Zinc (Zn) and Manganese (Mn) were determined by an atomic absorption spectrophotometer[27]. The soil organic carbon was characterized by the wet digestion (oxidation) method of Walkley-Black[28]. The soil pH was measured electrochemically in 1:2.5 (weight/volume) soil using the water suspension potentiometric method[29]. The availability of P in soils is influenced by soil pH, hence P analysis of soils was done by two methods, for soils with pH ≥ 6.5, extractable P was determined by the Olsen method and for soils with pH ≤ 6.5, Bray 1 method was used[30].
Nodules collection
-
The nodule samples were collected during cropping seasons from the same sites where the soils were sampled. The collection of nodule samples focused on the farmers' fields where rhizobia inoculants have never been used before for the purpose of obtaining the indigenous rhizobia which can effectively form nodules with soybean in the soils of Tanzania. At 50% flowering, from each farmer field, three healthy plants (treated as replicates) with intense green leaves were randomly collected by uprooting to obtain nodules in each field, making a total of 243 plants which were treated as separate samples[31,32]. The intense greening of leaves was considered as sufficiency of nitrogen in plants. The nodules for each plant were counted and the data was recorded.
Statistical data analysis
-
Different statistical methods were applied to analyze the collected data in terms of its distribution and correlation among the studied parameters. The Principle Component Analysis (PCA) for Soil Quality Indices was plotted by using XLSTAT software Version 2023.5.1. All the collected nodule data were statistically analyzed by Jamovi version 2.3.2.0, GenStat 15th Edition and the graphs were plotted using Excel 2016 in Windows 10. The mean and standard errors within the sites for nutrients in soil as well as correlation matrix between nodules number and soil nutrients were calculated by using Jamovi version 2.3.2.0. The mean separation within and between sites for nodule number were determined by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) following the factor effect model as shown in Eqn 1. Tukey's-HSD multiple comparison test at a threshold of 5% in GenStat 15th Edition was conducted to separate mean values among replications of the nodule number. Therefore, only one factor – the sampling site (i.e., 81 sites) with different soil characteristics was considered as the fixed main effect whereas sample replicates were treated as random effect.
$ {\mathrm{Y}}_{i}=\mathrm{\mu }+{\mathrm{\alpha }}_{i}+{\mathrm{\varepsilon }}_{i} $ (1) Where Yi is the observed response variable in the ith factor; µ is the overall (grand) mean; αi is the main effect of the factor sampling site; εi is the random error associated with the observation of response variable in the ith factor.
-
The data for soil physico-chemical properties of the studied sites are summarized in Table 1 with details in Supplemental Tables S1 & S2. The soil pH in all 81 sites was extremely acidic to moderately alkaline with an average of 6.222 ± 0.655 and total acidity low to very high with an average of 0.292 ± 0.589 cmol(+)Kg−1. The CEC of the soils was very low to medium with an average of 7.899 ± 4.582 cmol(+)Kg−1. In the case of exchangeable bases, Ca was low to high with an average of 5.099 ± 3.698 cmol(+)Kg−1), Mg been very low to high with an average of 1.257 ± 0.906 cmol(+)Kg−1), while K was low to very high with an average of 0.277 ± 0.397 cmol(+)Kg−1) and Na was very low to low with an average value of 0.026 ± 0.034 cmol(+)Kg−1). The concentration of extractable P in the soils was low to very high with an average value of 33.909 ± 37.264 mg·kg−1. The OC in the soils ranged from very low to high with an average of 1.663% ± 0.893 and total N varied from very low to medium with an average of 0.153% ± 0.074% while the ratio of carbon and nitrogen (CN ratio) was of low quality which was less than 8 and moderate quality which was greater than 13 with an average value of 11.385 ± 2.591. On the other hand, there was variation in the levels of micronutrients whereby Cu and Zn ranged from very low to very high with their averages been 3.312 ± 7.984 and 4.410 ± 5.859 mg·kg−1 while Mn varied from medium to very high with an average of 80.462 ± 43.892 mg·kg−1 and Fe from high to very high with an average of 66.553 ± 63.671 mg·kg−1.
Table 1. Soil chemical parameters of the study sites.
Parameter Number Minimum Maximum Mean Std. deviation Soil pH (1:2.5) (H2O) 81 4.480 7.923 6.222 0.655 Cu (mg·kg−1) 81 0.048 49.185 3.312 7.984 Zn (mg·kg−1) 81 0.062 40.778 4.410 5.859 Mn (mg·kg−1) 81 1.597 172.535 80.462 43.892 Fe (mg·kg−1) 81 7.840 526.726 66.553 63.671 TN-Kjeld (%) 81 0.066 0.378 0.153 0.074 OC-BlkW (%) 81 0.427 4.993 1.663 0.893 C/N ratio 81 4.670 19.778 11.385 2.591 Ext. P (mg·kg−1) 81 2.352 166.179 33.909 37.264 CEC (cmol(+)Kg−1) 81 1.913 20.801 7.899 4.582 Ca2+ (cmol(+)Kg−1) 81 0.202 14.375 5.099 3.698 Mg2+ (cmol(+)Kg−1) 81 0.177 3.479 1.257 0.906 Na+ (cmol(+)Kg−1) 81 0.000 0.255 0.026 0.034 K+ (cmol(+)Kg−1) 81 0.034 2.692 0.277 0.397 Total acidity
(cmol(+)Kg−1)81 0.085 5.153 0.292 0.589 Exch. Al
(cmol(+)Kg−1)81 0.000 0.847 0.045 0.125 Exch. H
(cmol(+)Kg−1)81 0.000 4.743 0.247 0.543 Principal Component Analysis (PCA) shows that the first two PCs explain around 43.7% of the variance and the first five PCs explain 70.1% of the variance (Fig. 3; Supplemental Tables S3 & S4). These PCs were selected according to the method described by other researchers[33−35]. Twelve other PCs were excluded from the present study. The eigenvectors in the context of the PCA (Table 2; Fig. 4) revealed the relationships between the original variables (soil pH, Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, TN-Kjeldahl, OC-BlkW, C/N ratio, P, CEC, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, K+, Total acidity, Al3+, and H+) and the extracted PCs (F1 to F5). Results further indicated that the first PC (F1) reflect relatively higher positive contributions from variables soil pH, Cu, Zn, Ext. P, CEC, Ca2+, Mg2+, K+, Total Acidity, Al3+, and H+. The PC (F2) has notable positive contributions from variables Fe, Na, K, Total acidity, Al3+, and H+. The third PC (F3) is negatively influenced by the variable soil pH, Cu, Zn, TN-Kjeld, OC-BlkW, C/N ratio, Total acidity, Al3+, and H+ while positively correlated with extractable P, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+, and K+. The fourth PC has strong positive contributions from variables Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe, P, and C/N ratio and the last component F5 is negatively influenced by Fe, Na+, K+, Total acidity, Al3+, and H+.
Table 2. Summarization of the Principal Component Analysis.
Variables F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 Soil pH (1:2.5) (H2O) 0.209 −0.143 0.520 0.031 0.033 Cu (mg·kg−1) 0.077 −0.002 −0.113 0.332 −0.515 Zn (mg·kg−1) 0.212 0.045 −0.008 0.521 0.045 Mn (mg·kg−1) −0.115 0.034 −0.066 0.406 −0.399 Fe (mg·kg−1) 0.015 0.318 −0.128 0.169 −0.008 TN-Kjeld (%) 0.291 0.104 −0.473 −0.071 −0.136 OC-BlkW (%) 0.284 0.137 −0.493 0.058 0.185 C/N ratio 0.063 0.115 −0.114 0.209 0.654 Ext. P (mg·kg−1) 0.285 0.050 0.304 0.190 −0.025 CEC (cmol(+)Kg−1) 0.406 0.089 0.157 0.021 0.010 Ca2+ (cmol(+)Kg−1) 0.396 0.008 0.171 0.093 0.025 Mg2+( cmol(+)Kg−1) 0.364 0.014 0.069 −0.014 0.006 Na+ (cmol(+)Kg−1) 0.251 0.035 −0.044 −0.431 −0.287 K+ (cmol(+)Kg−1) 0.317 0.058 −0.042 −0.345 −0.074 Total acidity (cmol(+)Kg−1) −0.103 0.606 0.171 −0.047 −0.040 Exch. Al (cmol(+)Kg−1) −0.061 0.335 0.044 −0.139 −0.026 Exch. H (cmol(+)Kg−1) −0.102 0.581 0.174 −0.021 −0.037 Relationships among different soil parameters with nodulation
-
A correlation analysis (Table 3) performed across nodules number, chemical and physical parameters of the studied soils, showed variation across the parameters ranging from negative non-significant to strong positive correlations. A total of 13 out of 17 physico-chemical parameters were negatively correlated with nodules number. A positive significant (p < 0.05) correlations for nodules number was observed with soil pH (r = 0.14) and a negative significant (p < 0.05) correlations with total N (r = −0.22), OC (r = −0.27) and Mg2+ (r = −0.24). Soil pH had positive significant (p < 0.001) correlation with P (r = 0.48), CEC (r = 0.46), Ca2+ (r = 0.52), Mg2+ (r = 0.39) and p < 0.05 with K+ (r = 0.23). Total N had positive significant (p < 0.001) correlation with OC (r = 0.88), CEC (r = 0.47), Ca2+ (r = 0.43), Mg2+ (r = 0.50), Na+ (r = 0.44) and p < 0.05 with P (r = 0.22) and Zn (r = 0.25). There was positive significant (p < 0.001) correlation between OC and CN ratio (r = 0.37), CEC (r = 0.47), Ca2+ (r = 0.44), Mg2+ (r = 0.47) and K+ (r = 0.41) and at p < 0.01 with Zn (r = 0.33 while at p < 0.05 with P and Na+ both with r = 0.24.
Table 3. The correlation matrix among different soil chemical parameters and nodule number.
Parameters Nodules Soil pH % C/N
ratioMg/kg cmol(+)kg-1 Mg/kg TN-Kjeld OC-BlkW Ext. P CEC Ca2+ Mg2+ Na+ K+ Tot. acidity Al3+ H+ Cu Zn Mn Fe Nodules − Soil pH 0.14* − TN-Kjeld −0.22* −0.056ns − OC-BlkW −0.27* −0.09ns 0.88*** − C/N ratio −0.13ns −0.03ns −0.03ns 0.37*** − Ext. P −0.11ns 0.48*** 0.22* 0.24* 0.07ns − CEC −0.19ns 0.46*** 0.47*** 0.47*** 0.12ns 0.61*** − Ca2+ −0.15ns 0.52*** 0.43*** 0.44*** 0.11ns 0.61*** 0.97*** − Mg2+ −0.24* 0.39*** 0.50*** 0.47*** 0.07ns 0.54*** 0.79*** 0.70*** − Na+ −0.07ns 0.21ns 0.44*** 0.24* −0.12ns 0.16ns 0.47*** 0.42*** 0.38*** − K+ −0.03ns 0.23* 0.45*** 0.41*** 0.07ns 0.34** 0.62*** 0.52*** 0.51*** 0.68ns*** − Tot. acidity −0.07ns −0.17ns −0.11ns −0.10ns 0.05ns −0.03ns −0.04ns −0.16ns −0.15ns −0.05ns −0.08 − Al3+ 0.09ns −0.09ns 0.02ns 0.04ns −0.03ns 0.05ns −0.11ns −0.17ns −0.06ns −0.09ns 0.004 0.46*** − H+ −0.10ns −0.17ns −0.13ns −0.12ns 0.07ns −0.05ns −0.02ns −0.14ns −0.16ns −0.03ns −0.10 0.96*** 0.28* − Cu −0.15ns −0.01ns 0.18ns 0.09ns −0.16ns 0.19ns 0.11ns 0.12ns 0.07ns 0.09ns 0.07 −0.07 −0.09 −0.05 − Zn −0.05ns 0.23* 0.25* 0.33** 0.22ns 0.30** 0.42*** 0.46*** 0.31ns** 0.06ns 0.19 −0.08 −0.09 −0.07 0.17 − Mn 0.15ns −0.19ns −0.07ns −0.15ns −0.15ns −0.11ns −0.22ns −0.20ns −0.17ns −0.13ns −0.27* 0.10 0.06 0.09 0.17 0.14 − Fe −0.19ns −0.13ns 0.11ns 0.15ns 0.06ns −0.001ns 0.06ns 0.04ns 0.00ns −0.023ns 0.001 0.29** 0.004 0.32** 0.14 0.10 −0.08 − Correlation coefficients (r) in individual cells represent each correlation between variables. Values with asterisk (*) are statistically significant different at * < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 and *** p < 0.001. ns-non significant. The charges in initials of nutrient names represents exchangeable Furthermore, extractable P had positive significant (p < 0.001) correlation with CEC and Ca2+ (r = 0.61), Mg2+ (0.54), and at p < 0.01 with K+ (r = 0.34) and Zn (r = 0.30). Cation Exchange Capacity had positive significant (p < 0.001) correlation with Ca2+ (r = 0.97), Mg2+ (r = 0.79), Na+ (r = 97), K+ (r = 0.62) and Zn (r = 0.42). Calcium had positive significant (p < 0.001) correlation with Mg2+ (r = 0.70), Na+ (r = 0.42), K+ (r = 0.52) and Zn (r = 0.46). Magnesium had positive significant (p < 0.001) with Na+ (0.38), K+ (0.51) and at p < 0.01 with Zn (r = 0.31). Other parameters which were significantly (p < 0.001) correlated include Na+ with K+ (r = 0.64), total acidity with Al3+ (r = 0.46) and H+ (r = 0.98). On the other hand, there was significant (p < 0.01) correlation between total acidity and H+ with Fe (r = 0.29) and (r = 0.32), respectively, while K+ significantly (p = 0.05) correlated with Mn (r = −0.27) and Al3+ with H+ (r = 0.28).
Nodulation as influenced by different chemical parameters of the soils
-
Two hundred and forty-three plants were sampled from 81 farmers' fields and the number of nodules were counted per plant by treating one plant as a replicate. The distribution of the number of nodules was evaluated basing on the different physico-chemical characteristics of soils in study areas. Soil pH, total N, OC, extractable P, exchangeable Ca2+ and Mg2+ were observed to influence the formation of nodules in different areas (Fig. 5). In the case of soil pH, the higher average number of nodules (8.82) was observed in neutral pH soils which was closely followed by (8.67) in slightly acidic soils while the lowest (3.3) was in very strongly acidic soils. Nodules number were observed to be higher (10.86) in the soils with very low total N, closely followed by (6.98) in the soils with low total N while the lowest 6.19 was in soils with medium N levels. The soils with higher OC had the highest average nodules number (15.55) closely followed by (8.79) in soils with very high OC whilst the lowest (2.95) was in soils with very low OC.
Figure 5.
The influence of total nitrogen, organic carbon and extractable phosphorus on nodulation (VL = very low, L = low, M = medium, H = high and VH = very high), soil pH ratings as per Msanya[36] (VSA = very strongly acidic, StA = strongly acidic, MeA = medium acidic, SlA = slightly acidic, N = neutral, MiA = mildly alkaline and MoA = moderate alkaline.
The highest average nodules number (10.81) was observed in soils with higher P (> 10, by Olsen method of determination) and (9.3) (extractable p > 10, by Bray method) while the lowest (3.62) was in soils with low extractable P (p < 7, by Bray method). For the case of exchangeable Ca, the highest number of nodules (9.7) was observed in clayey soils with high Ca levels, followed by sandy soils with very high Ca levels (8.10) and loamy soils with medium Ca levels (8.1) whereas the lowest number (3.66) was in loamy soils with very high Ca levels. Highest exchangeable Mg levels in sandy soils favored nodules formation by exhibiting the highest (9.7) nodules number, followed by low Mg loamy soils (8.8) and low Mg clayey soils (5.5) while, the lowest (3.2) was in medium Mg clayey soil.
Nodulation as influenced by exchangeable potassium, soil texture and micronutrients
-
Exchangeable potassium, soil texture and micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, and Fe) were observed to influence nodule formation (Fig. 6). In this study, sandy soils with high levels of K were observed to possess the highest number of nodules (11.17), followed by clayey soils with medium levels of K (10.00) and clayey soils with low levels of K while loamy soils with very low levels of K had the lowest (6.2) number of nodules. Furthermore, the highest number of nodules (9.50) was observed in sandy soil closely followed by sandy loam soil (9.36) while the lowest (4.51) was in clay loamy soil. The soils with low levels of Cu had the highest nodules (11.4) which was closely followed by (9.0) in medium and (8.8) in high Cu levels whilst the lowest (5.6) was in soils with very low levels of Cu. For the case of Zn, the soils with very high levels had the highest (11.1) number of nodules, this was followed by (7.5) and (7.2) in medium and high Cu levels, respectively. Conversely, the soils with very low levels of Zn had the lowest (1.3) number of nodules. The soils with very high levels of Mn had the highest (7.8) number of nodules while those with medium levels had the lowest (5.3) nodules. For the case of Fe, the soils with very high levels possessed the highest (12.0) nodules while those with high Fe levels had the lowest (7) nodules. However, for the case of Mn and Fe, it is difficult to exactly determine the influence of the nutrients basing on the distribution of nodules as the soils were categorized only in two groups.
-
The authors thank all staff and technical experts from Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NMAIST), Arusha-Tanzania for their guidance and support during sampling, laboratory and screen house experiments.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Nakei MD, Venkataramana PB, Ndakidemi PA. 2023. Assessment of the soil suitability for soybean growth and the prospect biofertilizers use in selected areas of Tanzania. Technology in Agronomy 3:11 doi: 10.48130/TIA-2023-0011
Assessment of the soil suitability for soybean growth and the prospect biofertilizers use in selected areas of Tanzania
- Received: 26 June 2023
- Accepted: 13 September 2023
- Published online: 19 October 2023
Abstract: The rapidly increasing global human population threatens the availability of safe and nutritious food. Among others, soil fertility degradation, insufficient use of proper fertilizers and scanty soil characterizations have major contributions in lowering the productivity of crops. To ensure the use of sufficient proper fertilizers for optimum crop productivity, it is important to evaluate the fertility status of soil which is a vital tool in deciding the type and the amount of fertilizer to be supplemented. This study aimed at evaluating soil fertility in the soybean growing and the non growing areas of Tanzania and to assess their suitability for growing the soybean crop as well as prospective use of rhizobia biofertilizers through the assessment of nodule formation in non-inoculated soybean plants grown in different farmers' fields. A total of 81 soil samples including those in soybean growing and non growing areas of Tanzania, were evaluated in terms of their fertility status through different physico-chemical parameters. From each field, three healthy plants with intense green leaves were selected for nodule counting. The study indicated that, most of the soils (85%) have medium acidic to neutral soil pH with 58% having sufficient organic carbon and 78% at risk of nitrogen deficiency. Soil pH, total N and OC had significant (p < 0.05) correlations (r) of 0.14, −0.22 and −0.27 with nodule number. The higher number of nodules were in medium acidic to neutral soils, with the highest number, 8.82 in neutral pH soils, indicating the favorability of the particular pH ranges for rhizobia activities. The results of this study suggest that most of the soils are suitable for the production of soybean and the use of rhizobia inoculants.
-
Key words:
- Nodules /
- Rhizobia inoculants /
- Soil fertility /
- Symbiotic nitrogen fixation