-
The morphology and growth parameters of thyme plant were significantly affected by different light qualities (Table 1). Based on the measurements on day 12, 24, and 36, significantly higher morphology and growth parameters were observed under treatment R4B1 compared with those under treatment FL, regardless of the cultivation period. However, morphology and growth parameters were affected by different R/B ratios and varied under different sampling times. On day 12, the highest shoot fresh/dry weight and root fresh weight were observed under treatment R4B1. No significant differences in root fresh/dry weight, root length, shoot fresh weight and plant height were observed in treatments R2B1, R1B1, and R1B2. On day 24, no significant differences in morphology and growth parameters of thyme plant were observed between treatments R4B1 and R2B1, except for root length. On day 36, no significant differences in all morphology and growth parameters were observed between treatments R4B1 and R2B1. However, significantly higher root fresh weight, root length, leaf area, plant height, and branch number were observed in treatment R4B1 than those under R1B1 and R1B2.
Table 1. Thyme plant morphology and growth as affected by different light qualities.
Days after treatment Light quality Plant height
(cm)Branch
numbersshoots fresh
weight (g)shoots dry
weight (g)Leaf area
(cm2)Root length
(cm)Roots fresh
weight (g)Roots dry
weight (g)12 days R4B1 15.63 A 15.33 A 2.56 A 0.57 A 27.47 A 17.37 A 0.76 A 0.06 A R2B1 14.63AB 14.00 AB 1.86 B 0.51 B 25.30 A 15.60 A 0.59 B 0.06 A R1B1 13.73 B 12.00 BC 1.55 BC 0.41 C 20.20 B 14.80 A 0.57 B 0.05 A R1B2 13.97 B 14.33 AB 1.57 BC 0.33 D 18.04 BC 15.53 A 0.60 B 0.05 A FL. 13.37 B 11.00 C 1.32 C 0.27 D 15.68 C 11.30 B 0.34 C 0.03 B 24 days R4B1 26.00 A 28.00 A 20.28 A 4.69 A 156.80 A 18.33 A 3.20 A 0.26 A R2B1 25.00 AB 26.33 AB 19.46 AB 4.22 A 150.30 A 16.00 B 2.66 AB 0.20 AB R1B1 23.00 AB 23.00 BC 17.42 AB 2.96 B 134.40 B 15.00 B 2.27 AB 0.16 BC R1B2 23.83 B 24.0 ABC 18.02 AB 3.00 B 131.60 B 14.67 B 1.98 B 0.15 BC FL. 20.00 C 21.00 C 17.13 B 2.79 B 127.90 B 14.00 B 2.04 B 0.11 C 36 days R4B1 29.67 A 40.67 A 32.24 A 5.60 A 199.80 A 21.33 A 3.73 A 0.27 A R2B1 27.33 AB 38.00 AB 29.81 A 5.15 A 191.30 A 20.00 AB 2.89 AB 0.24 AB R1B1 26.00 B 35.33 BC 29.21 A 4.88 AB 159.80 B 18.67 B 2.56 B 0.22 AB R1B2 26.67 B 32.00 CD 23.31 B 3.81 B 154.20 B 19.00 AB 2.44 B 0.20 B FL. 25.00 B 28.67 D 22.13 B 3.88 B 137.90 C 18.00 B 2.19 B 0.14 C FL = fluorescent lamp; R = Red; B = Blue. Means followed by different letters within a column are significantly different at P < 0.05 by Duncan's test. Chlorophyll concentration
-
Changes in chlorophyll a and b concentrations of thyme plants as influenced by light qualities varied on day 12, 24 and 36 after treatment (Table 2). On day 12, no significant differences in chlorophyll a were evident among the different R/B ratios, but were all significantly higher than the control treatment FL. For chlorophyll b, higher values were found under treatment R4B1 and R2B1 than R1B1, R1B2, and FL. On day 24, no significant differences in chlorophyll a and b of thyme plants were observed among all treatments. On day 36, the highest chlorophyll a and b levels were obtained under treatment R2B1. No significant differences in chlorophyll a and b of thyme plants were observed among treatment R4B1, R1B1, and R1B2. A significantly higher chlorophyll a and b levels were obtained under treatment R2B1 and R4B1 than under treatment FL.
Table 2. Chlorophyll a and b concentration of thyme leaves as affected by different light qualities.
Days after
treatment12 days 24 days 36 days Light quality R4B1 R2B1 R1B1 R1B2 FL R4B1 R2B1 R1B1 R1B2 FL R4B1 R2B1 R1B1 R1B2 FL Chl(a)
( mg/l)16.75 AB 18.64 A 16.38 AB 16.49 AB 14.43 B 15.71 A 18.91 A 17.77 A 16.92 A 15.26 A 19.90 B 23.10 A 19.36 B 18.30 BC 16.45 C Chl(b)
( mg/l)6.29 AB 6.82 A 4.83 B 4.96 B 4.98 B 5.11 A 6.30A 5.56 A 4.80 A 4.73 A 6.63 B 7.73 A 5.96 BC 5.90 BC 5.37
CFL = fluorescent lamp; R = Red; B = Blue. Means followed by different letters within a column are significantly different at P < 0.05 by Duncan's test. Volatile oil concentration
-
Volatile oil percentage and total volatile oil yield of thyme plants were significantly increased by treatment R4B1, R2B1, and R1B1 than treatments R1B2 and FL. However, no significant differences in volatile oil percentage and total volatile oil yield of thyme plants were observed under treatments R4B1, R2B1, and R1B1. A similar volatile oil percentage and total volatile oil yield of thyme plants were found under treatments R1B2 and FL. The average volatile oil percentage and the total volatile oil yield under treatment R4B1 increased by 27.6% and 77.8%, respectively, than those under treatment FL (Table 3).
Table 3. Volatile oil of thyme plants as affected by different light qualities.
Light quality Volatile oil
(%)Volatile oil yield
(mL plant−1)R4B1 2.82A 0.16 A R2B1 2.77 A 0.14 A R1B1 2.70 A 0.13 A R1B2 2.25 B 0.09 B FL 2.21 B 0.09 B FL = fluorescent lamp; R = Red; B = Blue. Means followed by different letters within a column are significantly different at P < 0.05 by Duncan's test. Volatile oil constituents
-
The volatile oil components of thyme plants under different light treatments were identified by GC/MS. About 31 components were identified which represented nearly from 99.46% to 99.83% (Table 4). The volatile oils of thyme plants were characterized as high levels of thymol (48.22%–49.83%), γ-terpinene (17.89%–19.11%), p-cymene (7.48%–8.85%) and α-terpinene (3.64%–4.25%). Thymol, γ-terpinene and α-terpinene reached their maximum relative percentage under treatment R4B1 and R1B1, while the maximum relative percentage of p-cymene was obtained under treatment R1B2. The monoterpenes hydrocarbons (NH) group ranged between 37.71% and 38.30%. Volatile oil of thyme plants was characterized by high amounts of oxygenated monoterpene hydrocarbons (OM). The highest percentage of this group was recorded at 57.63% under treatment R4B1, R1B1 and R1B2.
Table 4. Volatile oil constituents of thyme plants as affected by different light qualities.
Compound KI* R4B1 R2B1 R1B1 R1B2 FL [I]: Monoterpenes Hydrocarbons [MH] α-Thujene 913 2.18 1.98 2.18 2.18 1.91 α-Pinene, (−)- 938 0.96 0.99 0.96 0.96 0.94 Camphene 953 0.22 0.30 0.22 0.22 0.23 Sabinene 965 0.06 0.05 0.06 0.06 0.05 (−)-β-Pinene 980 0.27 0.28 0.27 0.27 0.30 β-Myrcene 986 2.25 2.27 2.25 2.25 2.42 α--Phellandrene 996 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.43 0.48 DELTA3-Carene 1004 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.14 p-Cymene 1025 7.48 7.70 7.48 7.48 7.54 D-Limonene 1030 0.65 0.67 0.65 0.65 1.10 Eucalyptol 1046 0.17 0.19 0.17 0.17 0.32 α-Terpinene 1057 4.25 4.03 4.25 4.25 4.23 γ-Terpinene 1057 19.11 18.72 19.11 19.11 17.89 α-Terpinolene 1087 0.15 0.14 0.15 0.15 0.16 Total MH 38.30 37.87 38.30 38.30 37.71 [II] Oxygenated Monoterpenes Hydrocarbons [OM] cis-Sabinene hydrate 1063 1.13 1.15 1.13 1.13 1.29 Linalool 1098 1.91 1.87 1.91 1.91 1.98 Terpinen-4-ol 1176 0.69 1.06 0.69 0.69 0.63 alpha-Terpineol 1189 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.15 Thymol methyl ether 1217 0.07 0.29 0.07 0.07 0.65 Carvacrol methyl ether 1247 0.16 0.34 0.16 0.16 0.78 Thymol 1293 49.83 49.06 49.83 49.83 48.22 Phenol, 2-methyl-5-(1-methylethyl)- 1307 3.71 3.26 3.71 3.71 3.76 Total OM 57.63 57.16 57.63 57.63 57.46 [III] Sesquterpenes Hydrocarbons [SH] Caryophyllene 1415 2.03 2.29 2.03 2.03 2.33 α-Humulene 1455 0.06 0.08 0.06 0.06 0.08 γ-Muurolene 1478 − 0.30 0.27 − 0.30 α-Muurolene 1486 0.27 − 0.14 0.27 0.06 γ-Cadinene 1515 0.15 0.23 0.15 0.15 0.24 delta-Cadinene 1526 0.25 0.32 0.25 0.25 0.34 γ-eudesmol 1608 − 0.13 − − 0.10 Total SH 2.76 3.35 2.90 2.76 3.45 IV: Oxygenated Sesquterpenes [OS] tau-Cadinol 1640 0.15 0.28 0.15 0.15 0.31 Total OS 0.15 0.28 0.15 0.15 0.31 [V]: Various compounds [VC] 1-Octen-3-ol 977 0.85 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.59 Total VC 0.85 0.80 0.85 0.85 0.59 Total Identified Compounds 99.69 99.46 99.83 99.69 99.52 FL = fluorescent lamp; R = Red; B = Blue. Correlation coefficient analysis between all the parameters
-
The majority of agronomic traits are complex in their genetic behavior and the result of the interaction of numerous component factors. It is of paramount importance to figure out the relationship between yield and its component traits to correctly select promising plant varieties. Correlation studies provide information on correlated response of important plant traits and therefore leads to a directional model for yield response. In our study, herb yield and essential oil yield were very important economic traits for thyme plant. According to our results (Table 5), all vegetative characters had a positive and significant correlation coefficient with fresh and dry weights of shoots especially branch number. Also, all traits in this study exhibited a significant and positive correlation with essential oil percentage and essential oil yield especially fresh and dry weights of shoots.
Table 5. Correlation coefficient between the parameters.
Parameters Height (cm)
1Fresh
weight (g)
2Dry
weight (g)
3Branches
number/plant
4Leaf area
(cm2)
5Root length (cm)
6Root fresh
weight (g)
7Root dry
weight (g)
8Chl
(a)
(mg L−1)
9Chl (b)
(mg L−1)
10V. oil (%)
11V. oil yield
(L Plant−1)
121 1 0.882* 0.774 0.771** 0.959** 0.935** 0.919** 0.823** 0.604* 0.674** 0.680** 0.773** 2 1 0.958** 0.933** 0.898** 0.900** 0.961** 0.930** 0.807** 0.790** 0.925** 0.958** 3 1 0.907** 0.788** 0.815** 0.891** 0.884** 0.755** 0.724** 0.978** 0.961** 4 1 0.832** 0.883** 0.852** 0.811** 0.735** 0.712** 0.899** 0.983** 5 1 0.950** 0.891** 0.821** 0.683** 0.733** 0.697** 0.820** 6 1 0.872** 0.817** 0.601* 0.640* 0.739** 0.871** 7 1 0.858** 0.744** 0.736** 0.841** 0.871** 8 1 0.796** 0.807** 0.868** 0.863** 9 1 0.956** 0.790** 0.773** 10 1 0.748** 0.750** 11 1 0.956** 12 1 *Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed). **Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed). -
In this experiment, response of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) plant growth and nutritional quality to different light qualities were investigated in a plant factory. Compared with FL, the combined red and blue lights were more efficient in improving plant growth and volatile oil concentrations. Significantly higher fresh/dry weights, leaf area, and volatile oil concentrations of thyme plants were obtained when grown under treatment R4B1 than under treatment FL. Thymol, γ-terpinene, p-cymene, and α-terpinene were the main constituents of volatile oils of thyme plants grown in a controlled environment system. Volatile oil constituents and their related concentrations varied according to light qualities. The above results indicated that treatment R4B1 can be considered as the optimal light regimen for thyme plants growth and volatile oil production in a plant factory with LEDs.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Ali HE, Tong Y. 2023. Volatile oil concentration and growth of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) plants responded to red to blue light ratios. Technology in Horticulture 3:2 doi: 10.48130/TIH-2023-0002
Volatile oil concentration and growth of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) plants responded to red to blue light ratios
- Received: 12 November 2022
- Accepted: 30 January 2023
- Published online: 27 February 2023
Abstract: The objective of this study was to evaluate the growth and volatile oil concentrations of thyme (Thymus vulgaris L.) plants under different red to blue light ratios of 4:1 (R4B1), 2:1 (R2B1), 1:1 (R1B1), and 1:2 (R1B2) with light-emitting diodes (LEDs) and fluorescent light (FL) in a plant factory. Thyme plants were sampled at three intervals of 12, 24, and 36 d after treatment. The results showed that the growth and medicinal components accumulation of thyme plants were significantly affected by different light qualities. The significant higher biomass, leaf area, and volatile oil concentrations of thyme plants were obtained under treatment R4B1 compared with treatment FL, regardless of the cultivation period. When analyzing the volatile oil constituents of thyme plants, thymol, γ-terpinene, p-cymene and α-terpinene were detected as the main constituents. However, the response of these different constituents varied with different light qualities. The above results indicated that the targeted constituent concentrations could be manipulated by employing different light qualities according to various purposes. Based on the above results, R4B1 can be considered as the optimal light treatment for thyme plants growth and volatile oil production in a closed production system with LEDs.
-
Key words:
- Thyme (Thymus vulgaris) /
- Volatile oil /
- Plant factories /
- Chlorophyll