Search
2024 Volume 3
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Grain size control in wheat: toward a molecular understanding

More Information
  • Received Date: 06 October 2023
    Accepted Date: 19 April 2024
    Published Online: 13 May 2024
    Seed Biology  3 Article number: e007 (2024)  |  Cite this article
  • Grain size is a major determinant of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield, which has a broad impact on worldwide food security. Not surprisingly, grain size underwent extensive artificial selection during wheat domestication and breeding. Recent advances in wheat molecular genetics and genomics have facilitated the elucidation of the molecular basis underlying grain size. Grain size determination is the cumulative result of source strength, photoassimilate remobilization, and sink strength. Here, we systematically review the recent progress in the cloning and molecular mechanisms of genes that regulate grain size in wheat following the source-to-sink flow. In addition, we discuss possible strategies for overcoming the trade-off between grain size and grain number, as well as synergetic improvement of grain yield and grain quality.
  • 加载中
  • Supplemental Tables S1 List of genes regulated grain size in wheat.
    Supplemental Tables S2 List of genes regulated grain size in rice.
  • [1]

    Choulet F, Alberti A, Theil S, Glover N, Barbe V, et al. 2014. Structural and functional partitioning of bread wheat chromosome 3B. Science 345:1249721

    doi: 10.1126/science.1249721

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Dubcovsky J, Dvorak J. 2007. Genome plasticity a key factor in the success of polyploid wheat under domestication. Science 316:1862−66

    doi: 10.1126/science.1143986

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Gegas VC, Nazari A, Griffiths S, Simmonds J, Fish L, et al. 2010. A genetic framework for grain size and shape variation in wheat. The Plant Cell 22:1046−56

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.110.074153

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Evers AD, Cox RI, Shaheedullah MZ, Withey RP. 1990. Predicting milling extraction rate by image analysis of wheat grains. Aspects of Applied Biology 25:417−26

    Google Scholar

    [5]

    Xie Q, Mayes S, Sparkes DL. 2015. Carpel size, grain filling, and morphology determine individual grain weight in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:6715−30

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv378

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Shewry PR, Mitchell RAC, Tosi P, Wan Y, Underwood C, et al. 2012. An integrated study of grain development of wheat (cv. Hereward). Journal of Cereal Science 56:21−30

    doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2011.11.007

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Xiang D, Quilichini TD, Liu Z, Gao P, Pan Y, et al. 2019. The transcriptional landscape of polyploid wheats and their diploid ancestors during embryogenesis and grain development. The Plant Cell 31:2888−911

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00397

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    Guo Y, Chen Y, Wang Y, Wu X, Zhang X, et al. 2023. The translational landscape of bread wheat during grain development. The Plant Cell 35:1848−67

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koad075

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Zhao L, Yang Y, Chen J, Lin X, Zhang H, et al. 2023. Dynamic chromatin regulatory programs during embryogenesis of hexaploid wheat. Genome Biology 24:7

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02844-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Hao C, Jiao C, Hou J, Li T, Liu H, et al. 2020. Resequencing of 145 landmark cultivars reveals asymmetric sub-genome selection and strong founder genotype effects on wheat breeding in China. Molecular Plant 13:1733−51

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2020.09.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Wang X, Dong L, Hu J, Pang Y, Hu L, et al. 2019. Dissecting genetic loci affecting grain morphological traits to improve grain weight via nested association mapping. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132:3115−28

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03410-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Jahani M, Mohammadi-Nejad G, Nakhoda B, Rieseberg LH. 2019. Genetic dissection of epistatic and QTL by environment interaction effects in three bread wheat genetic backgrounds for yield-related traits under saline conditions. Euphytica 215:103

    doi: 10.1007/s10681-019-2426-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Su Q, Zhang X, Zhang W, Zhang N, Song L, et al. 2018. QTL detection for kernel size and weight in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using a high-density SNP and SSR-based linkage map. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:1484

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01484

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [14]

    Cabral AL, Jordan MC, Larson G, Somers DJ, Humphreys DG, et al. 2018. Relationship between QTL for grain shape, grain weight, test weight, milling yield, and plant height in the spring wheat cross RL4452/‘AC Domain’. PLoS ONE 13:e0190681

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190681

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Cheng R, Kong Z, Zhang L, Xie Q, Jia H, et al. 2017. Mapping QTLs controlling kernel dimensions in a wheat inter-varietal RIL mapping population. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 130:1405−14

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2896-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [16]

    Gu L, Wei B, Fan R, Jia X, Wang X, et al. 2015. Development, identification and utilization of introgression lines using Chinese endemic and synthetic wheat as donors. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 57:688−97

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12324

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [17]

    Gao F, Wen W, Liu J, Rasheed A, Yin G, et al. 2015. Genome-wide linkage mapping of QTL for yield components, plant height and yield-related physiological traits in the Chinese wheat cross zhou 8425B/Chinese spring. Frontiers in Plant Science 6:1099

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.01099

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Cui F, Zhao C, Ding A, Li J, Wang L, et al. 2014. Construction of an integrative linkage map and QTL mapping of grain yield-related traits using three related wheat RIL populations. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 127:659−75

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2249-8

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Huang XQ, Cöster H, Ganal MW, Röder MS. 2003. Advanced backcross QTL analysis for the identification of quantitative trait loci alleles from wild relatives of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 106:1379−89

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-002-1179-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Yan Y, Wang ML, Guo YT, Ding CH, Niu KX, et al. 2023. HSP90.2 promotes CO2 assimilation rate, grain weight, and yield in wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:1229−39

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [21]

    Chen Y, Yan Y, Wu TT, Zhang GL, Yin H, et al. 2020. Cloning of wheat keto-acyl thiolase 2B reveals a role of jasmonic acid in grain weight determination. Nature Communications 11:6266

    doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20133-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [22]

    Gao Y, Li Y, Xia W, Dai M, Dai Y, et al. 2023. The regulation of grain weight in wheat. Seed Biology 2:17

    doi: 10.48130/seedbio-2023-0017

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [23]

    Xiong M, Feng GN, Gao Q, Zhang CQ, Li QF, et al. 2022. Brassinosteroid regulation in rice seed biology. Seed Biology 1:2

    doi: 10.48130/seedbio-2022-0002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Li N, Xu R, Li Y. 2019. Molecular networks of seed size control in plants. Annual Review of Plant Biology 70:435−63

    doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-050718-095851

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [25]

    Li W, Yang B. 2017. Translational genomics of grain size regulation in wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 130:1765−71

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2953-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Li N, Li Y. 2016. Signaling pathways of seed size control in plants. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 33:23−32

    doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2016.05.008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Batista-Silva W, da Fonseca-Pereira P, Martins AO, Zsögön A, Nunes-Nesi A, et al. 2020. Engineering improved photosynthesis in the era of synthetic biology. Plant Communications 1:100032

    doi: 10.1016/j.xplc.2020.100032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Niu KX, Chang CY, Zhang MQ, Guo YT, Yan Y, et al. 2023. Suppressing ASPARTIC PROTEASE 1 prolongs photosynthesis and increases wheat grain weight. Nature Plants 9:965−77

    doi: 10.1038/s41477-023-01432-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Al-Sheikh Ahmed S, Zhang J, Ma W, Dell B. 2018. Contributions of TaSUTs to grain weight in wheat under drought. Plant Molecular Biology 98:333−347

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-018-0782-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Gaur A, Jindal Y, Singh V, Tiwari R, Kumar D, et al. 2022. GWAS to identify novel QTNs for WSCs accumulation in wheat peduncle under different water regimes. Frontiers in Plant Science 13:825687

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.825687

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Miao L, Mao X, Wang J, Liu Z, Zhang B, et al. 2017. Elite haplotypes of a protein kinase gene TaSnRK2.3 associated with important agronomic traits in common wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:368

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00368

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [32]

    Song XJ, Huang W, Shi M, Zhu MZ, Lin HX. 2007. A QTL for rice grain width and weight encodes a previously unknown RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase. Nature Genetics 39:623−30

    doi: 10.1038/ng2014

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hong Y, Chen L, Du LP, Su Z, Wang J, et al. 2014. Transcript suppression of TaGW2 increased grain width and weight in bread wheat. Functional & Integrative Genomics 14:341−49

    doi: 10.1007/s10142-014-0380-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [34]

    Zhang Y, Li D, Zhang D, Zhao X, Cao X, et al. 2018. Analysis of the functions of TaGW2 homoeologs in wheat grain weight and protein content traits. The Plant Journal 94:857−66

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13903

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [35]

    Liu H, Li HF, Hao CY, Wang K, Wang YE, et al. 2020. TaDA1, a conserved negative regulator of kernel size, has an additive effect with TaGW2 in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 18:1330−42

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13298

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [36]

    Zhang Y, Yang C, Li Y, Zheng N, Chen H, et al. 2007. SDIR1 is a RING finger E3 ligase that positively regulates stress-responsive abscisic acid signaling in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 19:1912−29

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.106.048488

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [37]

    Wang J, Wang R, Mao X, Zhang J, Liu Y, et al. 2020. RING finger ubiquitin E3 ligase gene TaSDIR1-4A contributes to determination of grain size in common wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 71:5377−88

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/eraa271

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Zhang G, Yang J, Zhao X, Li Q, Wu Y, et al. 2021. Wheat TaPUB1 protein mediates ABA response and seed development through ubiquitination. Plant Science 309:110913

    doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2021.110913

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [39]

    Song L, Liu J, Cao B, Liu B, Zhang X, et al. 2023. Reducing brassinosteroid signalling enhances grain yield in semi-dwarf wheat. Nature 617:118−124

    doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06023-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [40]

    Huang K, Wang D, Duan P, Zhang B, Xu R, et al. 2017. WIDE AND THICK GRAIN 1, which encodes an otubain-like protease with deubiquitination activity, influences grain size and shape in rice. The Plant Journal 91:849−60

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13613

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    Miura K, Ikeda M, Matsubara A, Song XJ, Ito M, et al. 2010. OsSPL14 promotes panicle branching and higher grain productivity in rice. Nature Genetics 42:545−49

    doi: 10.1038/ng.592

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [42]

    Cao J, Liu K, Song W, Zhang J, Yao Y, et al. 2021. Pleiotropic function of the SQUAMOSA PROMOTER-BINDING PROTEIN-LIKE gene TaSPL14 in wheat plant architecture. Planta 253:44

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-020-03531-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Cao L, Li T, Geng S, Zhang Y, Pan Y, et al. 2023. TaSPL14-7A is a conserved regulator controlling plant architecture and yield traits in common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Frontiers in Plant Science 14:1178624

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1178624

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Ashikari M, Wu J, Yano M, Sasaki T, Yoshimura A. 1999. Rice gibberellin-insensitive dwarf mutant gene Dwarf 1 encodes the α-subunit of GTP-binding protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:10284−89

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.18.10284

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Fujisawa Y, Kato T, Ohki S, Ishikawa A, Kitano H, et al. 1999. Suppression of the heterotrimeric G protein causes abnormal morphology, including dwarfism, in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 96:7575−80

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.13.7575

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Utsunomiya Y, Samejima C, Takayanagi Y, Izawa Y, Yoshida T, et al. 2011. Suppression of the rice heterotrimeric G protein β-subunit gene, RGB1, causes dwarfism and browning of internodes and lamina joint regions. The Plant Journal 67:907−16

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04643.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Fan C, Xing Y, Mao H, Lu T, Han B, et al. 2006. GS3, a major QTL for grain length and weight and minor QTL for grain width and thickness in rice, encodes a putative transmembrane protein. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 112:1164−71

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-006-0218-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Li S, Liu Y, Zheng L, Chen L, Li N, et al. 2012. The plant-specific G protein γ subunit AGG3 influences organ size and shape in Arabidopsis thaliana. New Phytologist 194:690−703

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04083.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Ren X, Zhi L, Liu L, Meng D, Su Q, et al. 2021. Alternative splicing of TaGS3 differentially regulates grain weight and size in bread wheat. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22:11692

    doi: 10.3390/ijms222111692

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Huang X, Qian Q, Liu Z, Sun H, He S, et al. 2009. Natural variation at the DEP1 locus enhances grain yield in rice. Nature Genetics 41:494−97

    doi: 10.1038/ng.352

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Li A, Hao C, Wang Z, Geng S, Jia M, et al. 2022. Wheat breeding history reveals synergistic selection of pleiotropic genomic sites for plant architecture and grain yield. Molecular Plant 15:504−19

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2022.01.004

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [52]

    Kim EJ, Russinova E. 2020. Brassinosteroid signalling. Current Biology 30:R294−R298

    doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2020.02.011

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Yoo MJ, Albert VA, Soltis PS, Soltis DE. 2006. Phylogenetic diversification of glycogen synthase kinase 3/SHAGGY-like kinase genes in plants. BMC Plant Biology 6:3

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-6-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [54]

    Tong H, Liu L, Jin Y, Du L, Yin Y, et al. 2012. DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING acts as a direct downstream target of a GSK3/SHAGGY-Like Kinase to mediate Brassinosteroid responses in rice. The Plant Cell 24:2562−77

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.112.097394

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [55]

    Cheng X, Xin M, Xu R, Chen Z, Cai W, et al. 2020. A single amino acid substitution in STKc_GSK3 kinase conferring semispherical grains and its implications for the origin of Triticum sphaerococcum. The Plant Cell 32:923−34

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.19.00580

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Zhang X, Wang J, Huang J, Lan H, Wang C, et al. 2012. Rare allele of OsPPKL1 associated with grain length causes extra-large grain and a significant yield increase in rice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109:21534−39

    doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219776110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Qi P, Lin YS, Song XJ, Shen JB, Huang W, et al. 2012. The novel quantitative trait locus GL3.1 controls rice grain size and yield by regulating Cyclin-T1;3. Cell Research 22:1666−80

    doi: 10.1038/cr.2012.151

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Hu Z, He H, Zhang S, Sun F, Xin X, et al. 2012. A Kelch motif-containing serine/threonine protein phosphatase determines the large grain QTL trait in rice. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 54:979−90

    doi: 10.1111/jipb.12008

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Yang J, Zhou Y, Wu Q, Chen Y, Zhang P, et al. 2019. Molecular characterization of a novel TaGL3-5A allele and its association with grain length in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132:1799−1814

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03316-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Wang C, Zhang L, Xie Y, Guo X, Zhang Y, et al. 2022. A superior allele of the wheat gene TaGL3.3-5B, selected in the breeding process, contributes to seed size and weight. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 135:1879−91

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04081-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    Xu H, Sun H, Dong J, Ma C, Li J, et al. 2022. The brassinosteroid biosynthesis gene TaD11-2A controls grain size and its elite haplotype improves wheat grain yields. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 135:2907−23

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-022-04158-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [62]

    Ishimaru K, Hirotsu N, Madoka Y, Murakami N, Hara N, et al. 2013. Loss of function of the IAA-glucose hydrolase gene TGW6 enhances rice grain weight and increases yield. Nature Genetics 45:707−11

    doi: 10.1038/ng.2612

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [63]

    Jia M, Li Y, Wang Z, Tao S, Sun G, et al. 2021. TaIAA21 represses TaARF25-mediated expression of TaERFs required for grain size and weight development in wheat. The Plant Journal 108:1754−67

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.15541

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Guo L, Ma M, Wu L, Zhou M, Li M, et al. 2022. Modified expression of TaCYP78A5 enhances grain weight with yield potential by accumulating auxin in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:168−82

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13704

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Ma M, Wang Q, Li Z, Cheng H, Li Z, et al. 2015. Expression of TaCYP78A3, a gene encoding cytochrome P450 CYP78A3 protein in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), affects seed size. The Plant Journal 83:312−25

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.12896

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Ashikari M, Sakakibara H, Lin S, Yamamoto T, Takashi T, et al. 2005. Cytokinin oxidase regulates rice grain production. Science 309:741−45

    doi: 10.1126/science.1113373

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Zhang L, Zhao YL, Gao LF, Zhao GY, Zhou RH, et al. 2012. TaCKX6-D1, the ortholog of rice OsCKX2, is associated with grain weight in hexaploid wheat. New Phytologist 195:574−84

    doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04194.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Lu J, Chang C, Zhang HP, Wang SX, Sun G, et al. 2015. Identification of a novel allele of TaCKX6a02 associated with grain size, filling rate and weight of common wheat. PLoS ONE 10:e0144765

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144765

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Shoaib M, Yang W, Shan Q, Sun L, Wang D, et al. 2020. TaCKX gene family, at large, is associated with thousand-grain weight and plant height in common wheat. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 133:3151−63

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-020-03661-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Mao H, Jian C, Cheng X, Chen B, Mei F, et al. 2022. The wheat ABA receptor gene TaPYL1-1B contributes to drought tolerance and grain yield by increasing water-use efficiency. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:846−61

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13764

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [71]

    Niaz M, Zhang L, Lv G, Hu H, Yang X, et al. 2023. Identification of TaGL1-B1 gene controlling grain length through regulation of jasmonic acid in common wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:979−89

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14009

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Wang S, Wu K, Yuan Q, Liu X, Liu Z, et al. 2012. Control of grain size, shape and quality by OsSPL16 in rice. Nature Genetics 44:950−54

    doi: 10.1038/ng.2327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [73]

    Yan X, Zhao L, Ren Y, Dong Z, Cui D, et al. 2019. Genome-wide association study revealed that the TaGW8 gene was associated with kernel size in Chinese bread wheat. Scientific Reports 9:2702

    doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38570-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [74]

    Liu Y, Chen J, Yin C, Wang Z, Wu H, et al. 2023. A high-resolution genotype–phenotype map identifies the TaSPL17 controlling grain number and size in wheat. Genome Biology 24:196

    doi: 10.1186/s13059-023-03044-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [75]

    Liu J, Chen Z, Wang Z, Zhang Z, Xie X, et al. 2021. Ectopic expression of VRT-A2 underlies the origin of Triticum polonicum and Triticum petropavlovskyi with long outer glumes and grains. Molecular Plant 14:1472−88

    doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2021.05.021

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [76]

    Adamski NM, Simmonds J, Brinton JF, Backhaus AE, Chen Y, et al. 2021. Ectopic expression of Triticum polonicum VRT-A2 underlies elongated glumes and grains in hexaploid wheat in a dosage-dependent manner. The Plant Cell 33:2296−319

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koab119

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [77]

    Ur Rehman S, Wang J, Chang X, Zhang X, Mao X, et al. 2019. A wheat protein kinase gene TaSnRK2.9-5A associated with yield contributing traits. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 132:907−19

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-018-3247-7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Zhang ZG, Lv GD, Li B, Wang JJ, Zhao Y, et al. 2017. Isolation and characterization of the TaSnRK2.10 gene and its association with agronomic traits in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLOS One 12:e0174425

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174425

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Kong X, Wang F, Wang Z, Gao X, Geng S, et al. 2023. Grain yield improvement by genome editing of TaARF12 that decoupled peduncle and rachis development trajectories via differential regulation of gibberellin signalling in wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:1990−2001

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14107

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Ma L, Li T, Hao C, Wang Y, Chen X, et al. 2016. TaGS5-3A, a grain size gene selected during wheat improvement for larger kernel and yield. Plant Biotechnology Journal 14:1269−80

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12492

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Wang S, Yan X, Wang Y, Liu H, Cui D, et al. 2016. Haplotypes of the TaGS5-A1 gene are associated with thousand-kernel weight in Chinese bread wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:783

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00783

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [82]

    Hu MJ, Zhang HP, Liu K, Cao JJ, Wang SX, et al. 2016. Cloning and characterization of TaTGW-7A gene associated with grain weight in wheat via SLAF-seq-BSA. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:1902

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01902

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Sajjad M, Ma X, Habibullah Khan S, Shoaib M, Song Y, et al. 2017. TaFlo2-A1, an ortholog of rice Flo2, is associated with thousand grain weight in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biology 17:164

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-017-1114-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [84]

    Milner MJ, Bowden S, Craze M, Wallington EJ. 2021. Ectopic expression of TaBG1 increases seed size and alters nutritional characteristics of the grain in wheat but does not lead to increased yields. BMC Plant Biology 21:524

    doi: 10.1186/s12870-021-03294-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Ma D, Yan J, He Z, Wu L, Xia X. 2012. Characterization of a cell wall invertase gene TaCwi-A1 on common wheat chromosome 2A and development of functional markers. Molecular Breeding 29:43−52

    doi: 10.1007/s11032-010-9524-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [86]

    Jiang Y, Jiang Q, Hao C, Hou J, Wang L, et al. 2015. A yield-associated gene TaCWI, in wheat: its function, selection and evolution in global breeding revealed by haplotype analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 128:131−43

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-014-2417-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Hou J, Jiang Q, Hao C, Wang Y, Zhang H, et al. 2014. Global selection on sucrose synthase haplotypes during a century of wheat breeding. Plant Physiology 164:1918−29

    doi: 10.1104/pp.113.232454

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [88]

    Jiang Q, Hou J, Hao C, Wang L, Ge H, et al. 2011. The wheat (T. aestivum) sucrose synthase 2 gene (TaSus2) active in endosperm development is associated with yield traits. Functional & Integrative Genomics 11:49−61

    doi: 10.1007/s10142-010-0188-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Liu H, Si X, Wang Z, Cao L, Gao L, et al. 2023. TaTPP-7A positively feedback regulates grain filling and wheat grain yield through T6P-SnRK1 signalling pathway and sugar-ABA interaction. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:1159−75

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [90]

    Rose JKC, Lee SJ. 2010. Straying off the highway: trafficking of secreted plant proteins and complexity in the plant cell wall proteome. Plant Physiology 153:433−36

    doi: 10.1104/pp.110.154872

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Aebi M. 2013. N-linked protein glycosylation in the ER. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research 1833:2430−37

    doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2013.04.001

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [92]

    Zhu X, Rong W, Wang K, Guo W, Zhou M, et al. 2022. Overexpression of TaSTT3b-2B improves resistance to sharp eyespot and increases grain weight in wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:777−93

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13760

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [93]

    Dale EM, Housley TL. 1986. Sucrose synthase activity in developing wheat endosperms differing in maximum weight. Plant Physiology 82:7−10

    doi: 10.1104/pp.82.1.7

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [94]

    Dickinson DB, Preiss J. 1969. Presence of ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase in shrunken-2 and brittle-2 mutants of maize endosperm. Plant Physiology 44:1058−62

    doi: 10.1104/pp.44.7.1058

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [95]

    Hou J, Li T, Wang Y, Hao C, Liu H, et al. 2017. ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase genes, associated with kernel weight, underwent selection during wheat domestication and breeding. Plant Biotechnology Journal 15:1533−43

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.12735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Irshad A, Guo H, Zhang S, Gu J, Zhao L, et al. 2019. EcoTILLING reveals natural allelic variations in starch synthesis key gene TaSSIV and its haplotypes associated with higher thousand grain weight. Genes 10:307

    doi: 10.3390/genes10040307

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Kirchberger S, Tjaden J, Neuhaus HE. 2008. Characterization of the Arabidopsis Brittle1 transport protein and impact of reduced activity on plant metabolism. The Plant Journal 56:51−63

    doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2008.03583.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Wang Y, Hou J, Liu H, Li T, Wang K, et al. 2019. TaBT1, affecting starch synthesis and thousand kernel weight, underwent strong selection during wheat improvement. Journal of Experimental Botany 70:1497−511

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erz032

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Irshad A, Guo H, Ur Rehman S, Wang X, Gu J, et al. 2021. Identification of single nucleotide polymorphism in TaSBEIII and development of KASP marker associated with grain weight in wheat. Frontiers in Genetics 12:1484

    doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.697294

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [100]

    Guo X, Fu Y, Lee YRJ, Chern M, Li M, et al. 2022. The PGS1 basic helix-loop-helix protein regulates Fl3 to impact seed growth and grain yield in cereals. Plant Biotechnology Journal 20:1311−26

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.13809

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Ma S, Han W, Li L, Zheng X, Wang X. 2019. The thermal stability, structural changeability, and aggregability of glutenin and gliadin proteins induced by wheat bran dietary fiber. Food & Function 10:172−79

    doi: 10.1039/c8fo01810c

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Payne PI. 1987. Genetics of wheat storage proteins and the effect of allelic variation on bread-making quality. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 38:141−53

    doi: 10.1146/annurev.pp.38.060187.001041

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [103]

    Cho K, Beom HR, Jang YR, Altenbach SB, Vensel WH, et al. 2018. Proteomic profiling and epitope analysis of the complex α-, γ-, and ω-gliadin families in a commercial bread wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 9:818

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00818

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [104]

    Ravel C, Fiquet S, Boudet J, Dardevet M, Vincent J, et al. 2014. Conserved cis-regulatory modules in promoters of genes encoding wheat high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits. Frontiers in Plant Science 5:621

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00621

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [105]

    Albani D, Hammond-Kosack MC, Smith C, Conlan S, Colot V, et al. 1997. The wheat transcriptional activator SPA: a seed-specific bZIP protein that recognizes the GCN4-like motif in the bifactorial endosperm box of prolamin genes. The Plant Cell 9:171−84

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.9.2.171

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [106]

    Zhu J, Fang L, Yu J, Zhao Y, Chen F, et al. 2018. 5-Azacytidine treatment and TaPBF-D over-expression increases glutenin accumulation within the wheat grain by hypomethylating the Glu-1 promoters. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 131:735−46

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-3032-z

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [107]

    Dong G, Ni Z, Yao Y, Nie X, Sun Q. 2007. Wheat Dof transcription factor WPBF interacts with TaQM and activates transcription of an alpha-gliadin gene during wheat seed development. Plant Molecular Biology 63:73−84

    doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-9073-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [108]

    Guo W, Yang H, Liu Y, Gao Y, Ni Z, et al. 2015. The wheat transcription factor TaGAMyb recruits histone acetyltransferase and activates the expression of a high-molecular-weight glutenin subunit gene. The Plant Journal 84:347−59

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.13003

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [109]

    Gao Y, An K, Guo W, Chen Y, Zhang R, et al. 2021. The endosperm-specific transcription factor TaNAC019 regulates glutenin and starch accumulation and its elite allele improves wheat grain quality. The Plant Cell 33:603−22

    doi: 10.1093/plcell/koaa040

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [110]

    Li J, Xie L, Tian X, Liu S, Xu D, et al. 2021. TaNAC100 acts as an integrator of seed protein and starch synthesis exerting pleiotropic effects on agronomic traits in wheat. The Plant Journal 108:829−40

    doi: 10.1111/tpj.15485

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [111]

    Wang X, Liu Y, Hao C, Li T, Majeed U, et al. 2023. Wheat NAC-A18 regulates grain starch and storage proteins synthesis and affects grain weight. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 136:123

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-023-04365-3

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [112]

    Xie L, Liu S, Zhang Y, Tian W, Xu D, et al. 2023. Efficient proteome-wide identification of transcription factors targeting Glu-1: A case study for functional validation of TaB3-2A1 in wheat. Plant Biotechnology Journal 21:1952−65

    doi: 10.1111/pbi.14103

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [113]

    Sun F, Liu X, Wei Q, Liu J, Yang T, et al. 2017. Functional characterization of TaFUSCA3, a B3-superfamily transcription factor gene in the wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 8:1133

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.01133

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [114]

    Li Q, Li L, Yang X, Warburton ML, Bai G, et al. 2010. Relationship, evolutionary fate and function of two maize co-orthologs of rice GW2 associated with kernel size and weight. BMC Plant Biology 10:143

    doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-10-143

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [115]

    Bednarek J, Boulaflous A, Girousse C, Ravel C, Tassy C, et al. 2012. Down-regulation of the TaGW2 gene by RNA interference results in decreased grain size and weight in wheat. Journal of Experimental Botany 63:5945−55

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/ers249

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [116]

    Xia T, Li N, Dumenil J, Li J, Kamenski A, et al. 2013. The ubiquitin receptor DA1 interacts with the E3 ubiquitin ligase DA2 to regulate seed and organ size in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 25:3347−59

    doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.115063

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [117]

    Xie Q, Sparkes DL. 2021. Dissecting the trade-off of grain number and size in wheat. Planta 254:3

    doi: 10.1007/s00425-021-03658-5

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [118]

    Li T, Jiang J, Zhang S, Shu H, Wang Y, et al. 2015. OsAGSW1, an ABC1-like kinase gene, is involved in the regulation of grain size and weight in rice. Journal of Experimental Botany 66:5691−701

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv160

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [119]

    Khan N, Zhang Y, Wang J, Li Y, Chen X, et al. 2022. TaGSNE, a WRKY transcription factor, overcomes the trade-off between grain size and grain number in common wheat and is associated with root development. Journal Experimental Botany 73:6678−96

    doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac327

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [120]

    Calderini DF, Castillo FM, Arenas-M A, Molero G, Reynolds MP, et al. 2021. Overcoming the trade-off between grain weight and number in wheat by the ectopic expression of expansin in developing seeds leads to increased yield potential. New Phytologist 230:629−40

    doi: 10.1111/nph.17048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Wei B, Jiao Y. 2024. Grain size control in wheat: toward a molecular understanding. Seed Biology 3: e007 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0024-0007
    Wei B, Jiao Y. 2024. Grain size control in wheat: toward a molecular understanding. Seed Biology 3: e007 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0024-0007

Figures(1)

Article Metrics

Article views(837) PDF downloads(358)

Other Articles By Authors

REVIEW   Open Access    

Grain size control in wheat: toward a molecular understanding

Seed Biology  3 Article number: e007  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Grain size is a major determinant of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) yield, which has a broad impact on worldwide food security. Not surprisingly, grain size underwent extensive artificial selection during wheat domestication and breeding. Recent advances in wheat molecular genetics and genomics have facilitated the elucidation of the molecular basis underlying grain size. Grain size determination is the cumulative result of source strength, photoassimilate remobilization, and sink strength. Here, we systematically review the recent progress in the cloning and molecular mechanisms of genes that regulate grain size in wheat following the source-to-sink flow. In addition, we discuss possible strategies for overcoming the trade-off between grain size and grain number, as well as synergetic improvement of grain yield and grain quality.

    • During domestication and breeding, bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) underwent extensive artificial selection. The bread wheat genome is the result of two polyploidy events. Tetraploid wheat (AABB, 2n = 4x = 28) is the result of an ancient polyploidy event between Triticum urartu (AA, 2n = 2x = 14) and Aegilops speltoides (BB, 2n = 2x = 14). The second polyploidy event occurred approximately 10,000 years ago in the Fertile Crescent between presumably cultivated tetraploid wheat and wild Aegilops tauschii (DD, 2n = 2x = 14)[1], and the resulting hybrid (AABBDD, 2n = 6x = 42) is the bread wheat used today. Archaeobotanical evidence indicates that both the transitions from diploid wild einkorn (Triticum monococcum ssp aegilopoides; AmAm) to domesticated diploid forms (T. monococcum ssp monococcum) and from wild tetraploid emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp dicoccoides; BBAA) to domesticated tetraploid cultivars (T. turgidum ssp dicoccum) are associated with a trend toward larger grains. For hexaploid wheat, grain size continues to be an important selection trait. Today, wheat grains provide one-fifth of the calories and a substantial proportion of protein consumed by humans[2]. The main attributes of grain size, including grain width, grain length, and length/width ratio, are greatly different among the hexaploid wheat varieties[3]. Compared to the early common wheat landraces, such as T. aestivum ssp. spelta and ssp. macha, grain width was dramatically increased and grain length was decreased in the early stages of the bread wheat breeding process[3]. Therefore, the wheat grain shape has changed from long and thin to shorter and wider in modern bread wheat varieties[3]. In addition, as wheat is a staple commercial crop, its market requirements also distinctly influence the selection of grain size and shape. Important attributes, such as grain density, uniformity, end-use quality, protein content, and trace elements are also associated with grain size, and directly influence grain yield and flour quality, which determines the market value of wheat grains[4].

      Fertilization initiates grain development. Generally, the development process of wheat grains is divided into three stages: the cell division and expansion stage that occurs 1−14 d after anthesis (DAA), during which the basic structure of wheat grains are formed; the grain filling stage 14−28 DAA, during which the accumulation of starch and protein occurs and the grain dry weight increases by approximately twofold[5]; and grain maturation and desiccation that occurs from 28 DAA until complete maturation[6]. During the last stage, the grain filling slows and is complete by approximately 35 DAA. The fresh weight subsequently decreases rapidly until ~42 DAA due to desiccation[6].

      During wheat grain development, gene expression, and translation profiles change dynamically[69]. A substantial change in the transcriptome occurs during grain development[6]. Moreover, different subgenomes of wheat are unbalanced at both the transcriptional and translational levels[7, 8]. Dynamic chromatin landscape changes during embryogenesis is correlated with biased gene expression among homeolog gene triads and divergent expression among three subgenomes[9].

      Although grain size is a key yield component in wheat[10], the large polyploid wheat genome substantially impedes linkage mapping of genes regulating grain size and identification of molecular functions. More information on wheat grain size control has been obtained by population genetic studies, in which putative regulatory genes or QTLs are found by genetic mapping or genome-wide association studies (GWASs). With the use of molecular markers, many QTLs related to grain size or grain weight have been identified on all 21 wheat chromosomes in recent decades, and utilized in breeding[1119]. Recently, with the rapid development of wheat genome sequencing, genetic mapping has been utilized to identify causal genes for grain traits[20, 21]. A subset of these causal genes was independently confirmed by gene knockout and/or overexpression methods. There are excellent recent reviews centered on the molecular regulation pathways of grain size in rice and wheat[2226]. In this review, we instead focused on the source-flow-sink system to summarize the genes involved in photosynthesis, and carbohydrate transportation, as well as their roles in grain size determination. We also investigated genes directly affect grain size and grain filling, with particular attention given to the regulation of starch and seed storage protein (SSP) biosynthesis (Fig. 1). We also discussed difficulties and feasible strategies for grain size improvement.

      Figure 1. 

      Genes and genetic pathways regulating grain size in bread wheat and rice. The components without underlines are positive regulators of grain size, and those with underlines are negative regulators. The short connecting lines represent the proteins that physically interact. The bond genes were selected during wheat breeding. The genes with the same colors are homologous gene between wheat and rice. References for the individual genes are listed in Supplemental Tables S1 & S2 for wheat and rice genes, respectively.

    • During photosynthesis, solar energy is utilized and drives the accumulation of plant biomass and sink storage, such as in crop grains[27]. Genes related to chloroplast and chlorophyll synthesis play important roles in photosynthetic efficiency and capacity and influence wheat grain size. Recently, three genes related to chlorophyll content and the photosynthetic rate have been identified as grain size regulators[20, 21, 28]. Map-based cloning identified keto-acyl thiolase 2B (KAT-2B) as the causal gene for a large-grain mutant. Analysis of KAT-2B overexpressing lines revealed that KAT-2B can positively regulate grain size, weight, and yield. In addition, the leaf area and chlorophyll content increase in KAT-2B-overexpressing lines, indicating that the photosynthetic capacity is enhanced[21]. HSP90.2-B is the causal gene for the CO2 ASSIMILATION RATE AND KERNEL-ENHANCED1 (CAKE1) gene cloned from durum wheat[20]. It encodes a cytosolic molecular chaperone folding nascent preprotein that is crucial for the localization of nuclear-encoded photosynthesis units in chloroplasts. Mutation of HSP90.2-B led to a decreased photosynthetic rate, decreased grain size, and an 80% decrease in grain yield[20]. Similarly, the CAKE2 gene has been mapped to ASPARTIC PROTEASE1 (APP-A1), and a premature stop mutation increases the photosynthetic rate, grain size, and grain weight. The APP-A1 protein can degrade PsbO which is an important member of photosystem II[28]. By producing carbohydrates, photosynthesis is the first step in the source-flow-sink. Identification of genes that enhance photosynthetic capacity and efficiency is a constructive and effective way to increase sink storage at the source.

    • The long-distance transport of photosynthetic products is an essential bridge connecting the source and the sink and is key to the growth and development of sink tissues, such as grains and fruits. Sucrose is one of the main photosynthetic products and is remobilized by sucrose transporters (SUTs) in the vasculature leading to the grain. Among the 14 wheat sucrose transporter genes TaSUTs, TaSUT1 homeologous genes on chromosomes 4A, 4B, and 4D are expressed predominantly in the stem, leaf sheath, rachis, lemma, and developing grain, and their expression levels are significantly correlated with grain size and weight[29]. The peduncle is the key connection between the spike and the stem and plays important roles in the transportation of water-soluble carbohydrates[30]. Association analysis revealed that TaSnRK2.3-1A and TaSnRK2.3-1B are significantly associated with the length of the peduncle and penultimate node, as well as with grain size and weight. Additionally, one haplotype of TaSnRK2.3-1B was shown to be associated with increased grain weight and decreased plant height, whereas another was associated with increased grain weight, increased stem water-soluble carbohydrate contents, and decreased plant height; thus these two haplotypes were considered elite[31].

    • Genes involved in grain development may directly determine grain size. Cloning and functional analysis of such genes have been a key research direction for grain size[24, 26]. Since the large polyploid wheat genome substantially hinders the use of forward genetic methods and molecular functional identification, many grain size regulatory genes in wheat were studied by reverse genetic analysis of genes homologous to rice grain size regulators or by association analysis, which revealed homologs of rice grain size regulators. Here, we organized the genes related to grain size in wheat according to known regulatory pathways.

    • Ubiquitin‒proteasome degradation is extensively utilized by plants to regulate development. Several grain-size regulatory genes were found to encode ubiquitin‒proteasome degradation pathway proteins, including E2, E3 and their regulators. GRAIN WIDTH2 (GW2) encodes a RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase in rice[32]. Downregulation of three homeologous TaGW2 genes by RNA interference (RNAi) leads to significant increases in grain width and grain weight[33]. TaGW2-B1 has stronger effects on grain size regulation than TaGW2-D1 does, and TaGW2-B1 and TaGW2-D1 double gene knockdown plants have significantly larger grain sizes than single gene knockdown plants[34]. TaDA1 negatively regulates grain size in wheat. Downregulation of TaDA1 increases grain size and grain weight. In addition, TaDA1-A physically interacts with TaGW2-B1 and subsequently affects grain size in an additive way[35].

      Salt and drought-induced RING finger1 (SDIR1), is a RING-type E3 ubiquitin ligase that has been identified as a key player in the response to both salinity and drought stresses[36]. The grain size of the TaSDIR1-4A-silenced lines increased, and one haplotype showed a significant association with increased grain size and greater grain weight[37]. Another E3 ligase TaPUB1 can interact with TaPYL4 and TaABI5, both of which are components of the ABA signaling pathway, and subsequently induces the degradation of TaPYL4 and TaABI5. TaPUB1 overexpressing plants exhibit larger grains, whereas the corresponding RNAi lines exhibit smaller grains[38]. Similarly, ZnF-B, which is also a RING-type E3 ligase, positively regulates grain size[39].

      Rice OsOTUB1 is a deubiquitinating enzyme, whose mutant exhibits decreased grain width and thickness[40]. Rice OsSPL14 is degraded by OsOTUB1, which controls grain development[41]. In wheat, upon cleavage by miR156, the triple mutant of TaSPL14-5A, -5B and -5D exhibited reduced grain size and weight[42]. For another TaSPL14 member TaSPL14-7A, the preferred haplotypes are correlated with increased grain size and weight, which underwent positive selection during wheat breeding worldwide[43].

    • The G protein signaling pathway plays important roles in various developmental processes in plants and animals. Generally, the G protein complex has three subunits, Gα, Gβ and Gγ. In rice, both the Gα-encoding gene RGA1 and the Gβ-encoding gene RGB1 positively regulate grain size[4446]. Rice GRAIN SIZE3 (GS3), which encodes a noncanonical Gγ subunit, was identified as the causal gene that determines grain length[47, 48]. Alternative splicing of the heterotrimeric G-protein encoding gene TaGS3 controls wheat grain size. Different alternative splicing isoforms of TaGS3 have different functions related to grain size control[49]. The splicing isoforms TaGS3.23.4 have no effect on grain size, whereas the splicing isoform TaGS3.1 overexpression line has deduced grain weight and grain length. In contrast, upregulation of TaGS3.5 can significantly increase grain weight and grain length[49].

      Rice DENSE AND ERECT PANICLE1 (DEP1) shares homology with rice GS3, and a gain-of-function mutant of DEP1 with a truncated ORS domain shows decreased grain size, grain weight, and dense and erect panicles and increased grain number per panicle and grain yield per plant[50]. The TaDEP1 locus was also identified within a key QTL correlated with grain thickness by GWAS. It has been proposed that the function of TaDEP1 is conserved, and rice DEP1 is a regulator of grain weight and size[51].

    • The phytohormone brassinosteroids (BRs) regulate multiple plant growth and development processes[23, 52]. The BR signaling component rice OsGSK2, which encodes an ortholog of Arabidopsis BIN2, negatively regulates grain size[53], and phosphorylates DWARF AND LOW-TILLERING (DLT, also known as OsGRAS32, DWARF62, and GRAIN SIZE6)[54]. Wheat Tasg-D1 is an ortholog of OsGSK2 and plays a conserved role in negatively regulating grain size and weight[55].

      The causal gene of a rice grain length QTL, qGL3/GL3.1, is OsPPKL1, which encodes a Ser/Thr phosphatase with a Kelch-like repeat domain[5658]. OsPPKL1 dephosphorylates cyclin-T1;3 and subsequently regulates cell division in spikelets. A reduction in OsPPKL1 activity results in increased grain length and grain yield without affecting grain quality. In fact, the qgl3 allele has been utilized in breeding[56]. The wheat homologous gene TaGL3-5A harbors a SNP in the 11th exon that leads to an amino acid change, and the resulting TaGL3-5A-G allele is correlated with increased grain size and grain weight[59]. OsPPKL2 and OsPPKL3 are two OsPPKL1 homologs in the rice genome[56]. OsPPKL1 and OsPPKL3 decrease grain length, whereas OsPPKL2 increases grain length. TaGL3.3-5B is the homolog of OsPPKL3, with one allele associated with large grain size and under selection in breeding[60]. Taken together, the results of these studies in rice have shown that BR signaling plays important roles in regulating grain development, not only in grain size and grain filling but also grain number per panicle. Wheat homologous genes are frequently found in seed trait QTLs, suggesting possible conservative roles in seed development. Wheat TaD11-2A positively regulates the endogenous BR content, and TaD11-2A mutants exhibit dwarfism and small grains. In addition, wheat TaD11-2A is significantly associated with plant height, grain size, and grain yield per plant, with an elite haplotype that has been positively selected during wheat breeding[61].

      In addition to BR, auxin also plays important roles in determinating grain size. Rice THOUSAND-GRAIN WEIGHT 6 (TGW6) encodes indole-3-acetic acid (IAA)-glucose hydrolase, which catalyzes the transformation of IAA-glucose back to IAA and regulates early endosperm development. TGW6 negatively regulates grain size and weight without affecting grain quality[62]. Wheat TaIAA21 negatively regulates grain length, width, and weight. TaIAA21 can physically interact with TaARF25 and subsequently positively regulates grain size and weight in tetraploid wheat. TaARF25 further positively regulates the expression of TaERF3, whose mutants exhibit reduced grain size and weight. Therefore, TaIAA21 is a negative regulator of grain size and weight via interaction with the TaARF25–TaERF3 module in wheat[63].

      Overexpression of TaCYP78A5 specifically in the maternal integument significantly enhanced grain size, grain weight, and grain yield per plant in field trials. TaCYP78A5 is involved in the auxin synthesis pathway and increases auxin accumulation in the ovary. TaCYP78A5 expression prolongs the proliferation of maternal epidermal cells and increases the number of seed coat cells through auxin mediated flowering delay, thereby promoting grain enlargement[64]. Similarly, upregulation of TaCYP78A3 expression can increase grain size by regulating the number of cells in the seed coat[65].

      Rice OsCKX2 controls grain number[66], and several wheat homologs of OsCKX2 are associated with grain size traits. An 18-bp deletion in the 2nd intron of TaCKX6-D1[67] and a novel allele of TaCKX6a02[68] are associated with grain size and weight. In addition, TaCKX2A_2, TaCKX4A_2, TaCKX5A_3, and TaCKX9A_2 are also significantly associated with increased grain weight in the Chinese wheat micro-core collection (MCC) and a landrace wheat population[69].

      PYLs, which are abscisic acid (ABA) receptors, respond to plant drought stress. Overexpression of TaPYL1-1B improved drought tolerance and increased grain size and weight. The elite allele TaPYL1-1B confers not only drought tolerance but also increases grain size and yield[70].

      TaGL1-B1 has been identified as a regulator of grain length by GWAS. A mutant of TaGL1-B1 exhibits dramatically shorter grain lengths, and TaGL1-B1-overexpressing lines exhibit increased grain lengths. Moreover, TaGL1-B1 physically interacts with TaPAP6 which positively regulates grain length. The content of jasmonic acid (JA) is significantly increased in both the TaGL1-B1- and TaPAP6-overexpressing lines, suggesting that the JA pathway may influence grain length[71].

    • Among the genes affecting grain size, some are not associated with the abovementioned pathway. Wheat TaGW8 is an ortholog of rice GW8/OsSPL16 that increases grain size and grain yield by promoting cell division and grain filling[72]. The TaGW8-B1a haplotype is associated with greater grain size and greater grain weight, which is in contrast with the TaGW8-B1b haplotype, which lacks a 276-bp indel in the first intron[73]. Using GWAS, wheat TaSPL17 was identified as a positive regulator of grain size and grain number by regulating spikelet and floret meristem development, which in turn leads to increased grain yield per plant[74]. An elite TaSPL17 haplotype results in wider and longer grains and greater grain weight, accompanied by more spikelets per spike[74].

      Polish wheat (Triticum turgidum ssp. polonicum, previously known as Triticum polonicum) is a subspecies of tetraploid wheat with long glumes, lemmas and grains. Map-based cloning identified a MADS-box TF encoding gene VEGETATIVE TO REPRODUCTIVE TRANSITION2 (VRT2) as the causal gene underlying the long-glume P1 locus[75, 76]. Ectopic expression of VRT-A2 in hexaploid bread wheat causes longer glumes and grains, leading to larger grain sizes, confirming that the VRT-A2 expression level affects glume and seed length[75].

      Two members of the wheat TaSnRK2 family are reportedly involved in the regulation of grain size[77, 78]. Two favored TaSnRK2.9-5A haplotypes are associated with higher grain weight and have been positively selected in wheat breeding in China[77]. The TaSnRK2.10 haplotype is significantly associated with larger grain size[78].

      Using GWAS, wheat TaARF12 was identified as a plant height and spike length regulator[51]. Knockout of TaARF12 can significantly increase grain number per spike and result in higher grain weight[79].

      Wheat TaGS5-3A has two alleles that are discriminated by a G/T SNP in the coding region, and the TaGS5-3A-T allele was associated with larger grain size and higher grain weight in a population analysis[80, 81]. Schizosaccharomyces pombe expressing TaGS5-3A-T was shown to exhibit higher total serine carboxypeptidase activity than TaGS5-3A-G[80]. In addition, transgenic experiments in rice showed that TaGS5-3A-T overexpression lines are superior to TaGS5-3A-G overexpression lines in grain width, length and weight[80]. Furthermore, population analysis indicated that TaGS5-3A-T is a favored haplotype under positive selection[80].

      TaTGW-7A transcription levels were found to be positively associated with grain size and grain weight using the Chinese mini-core collection with 501 varieties. The elite allele TaTGW-7Aa exhibits higher expression levels and has been under strong and positive selection during wheat breeding[82].

      TaFlo2-A1, an ortholog of rice FLOURY ENDOSPERM2, is associated with grain size and weight in bread wheat[83]. Population genetics analysis was used to identify the TaFlo2-A1b allele as a positively selected haplotype[83].

      Ectopic expression of TaBG1, the homologous gene of rice BIG GRAIN1, leads to a larger grain size, but transgenic lines exhibit a trade-off in grain number per plant, resulting in no significant overall increase in gain yield[84].

    • The grain filling stage is a key step that determines grain weight and grain size. During this stage, starch, protein, and other organic matter produced through photosynthesis are assimilated in wheat grains. The duration and velocity of grain filling are two factors that affect grain size and weight. Cell wall invertases catalyze the irreversible hydrolysis of sucrose to glucose and fructose and play a key role in sink strength. Based on the nucleotide polymorphisms at the TaCwi-A1 locus, one haplotype was found to be associated with lower grain weight, whereas another was found to be associated with higher grain weight[85]. Similarly, a TaCWI-5D haplotype was shown to be distinctly associated with greater grain weight and is strongly selected during wheat polyploidization, domestication, and breeding[86]. TaSus converts sucrose to fructose and UDP-glucose during seed development. Both TaSus1 and TaSus2 are associated with grain size regulation[87, 88]. The trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase-encoding gene, TaTPP-7A, was identified as a putative grain size regulator that is expressed specifically in developing grains and significantly influences grain filling. Identification of TaTPP-7A-overexpressing wheat plants confirmed that TaTPP-7A is a key regulator of source-flow-sink interactions and sucrose allocation. Population genetic analysis revealed that TaTPP-7A is a domestication- and breeding-selected target gene[89].

      As an important posttranslational protein modification, asparagine N-glycosylation, which is catalyzed by the oligo saccharyl transferase (OST) complex, plays essential roles in plant development[90]. STAUROSPORINE AND TEMPERATURE SENSITIVE3 (STT3) is one of the subunits in the OST complex that catalyzes the subunit encoding oligosaccharyl transferase[91]. Overexpression of TaSTT3b-2B distinctly increases grain size and weight by increasing the expression of genes encoding starch synthase, and sucrose synthase[92].

    • Starch and seed storage proteins (SSPs) are the main components of wheat grains; they account for approximately 70% and 13%, respectively, of the weight of ripen grains and play essential roles in determining grain weight, size and quality[93]. Several key genes involved in starch synthesis, including ADP-glucose pyrophosphorylase (AGPase), starch synthase (SS), starch-branching enzyme (SBE), and debranching enzyme (DBE), have been studied in wheat. AGPase catalyzes the conversion of glucose-1-Pi to ADP-glucose, which is a rate-limiting enzyme in the starch synthesis pathway[94]. The AGPase tetrameric complex comprises two large subunits (LSUs) and two small subunits (SSUs)[94]. A haplotype of TaAGP-L-1B and a haplotype of TaAGP-S1-7A are associated with larger grain size and greater weight, respectively, in modern wheat cultivars, and their additive effects on the determination of grain size have been detected in wheat populations[95]. Starch synthesis IV (SSIV) is an important starch synthesis isoform, and its mutation reduces the number of starch granules per chloroplast in wheat. An elite SSIV allele is significantly associated with grain size and weight[96]. BRITTLE1 (BT1) is responsible for the transport of ADP-glucose which is essential for starch synthesis in Arabidopsis[97]. Knocking down the expression of TaBT1-6B in wheat decreases grain size and starch content[98]. TaBT1-6B-Hap1 and TaBT1-6B-Hap2 are two useful alleles under selection during modern wheat breeding[98]. In addition, a polymorphism in a starch-debranching enzyme-encoding gene, TaSBEIII-A, is associated with grain size and grain weight[99]. T. aestivum Positive Regulator of Grain Size 1 (TaPGS1) is a bHLH transcription factor (TF) encoding gene that is strongly expressed in the endosperm at 10-20 d postanthesis in wheat. Ectopic expression of TaPGS1 increases grain weight (up to 13.81% in wheat and 18.55% in rice) and grain size with decreasing starch granule size (smaller and tighter) in the proteinaceous matrix[100]. Furthermore, TaPGS1 can regulate the expression of TaFI3 by binding to the E-box motif in its promoter region.

      SSPs are also essential determinants not only of wheat grain weight but also of the end-use quality of wheat flour[101, 102]. SSPs include glutenin and gliadins. Based on their mobilities in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‒PAGE), glutenin can be further divided into high-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (HMW-GSs) and low-molecular-weight glutenin subunits (LMW-GSs)[102]. Gliadins consist of α/β-, γ-, ω- and δ-gliadin based on their different primary structures[103]. The expression and abundance of SSPs are regulated by the complicated network of TFs[104]. Wheat storage protein activator (TaSPA), a bZIP TF, is expressed specifically in grains and binds to the GCN4-like binding motif in the promoter of LMWG-1D1[105]. Wheat prolamin-box binding factor (WPBF) is a DNA-binding TF with one finger (Dof) that can bind to the promoter regions of gliadin-encoding genes, and LMW-GS and HMW-GS-encoding TaGlu-1By8 and -1Dx2 loci[106, 107]. TaGAMyb, which is a companion of the GCN5-like histone acetyltransferase, regulates the expression of the HMW-GS 1Dy encoding gene by binding to its promoter directly[108].

      The starch content in grains directly determines grain size and weight. However, the increase in SSPs usually occurs at the cost of grain weight. Therefore, the coordination of the starch content and SSPs content is crucial for balancing of grain size, weight and quality. Three NAC (NAM-ATAF-CUC) TFs, NAC-A18, TaNAC019 and TaNAC100, are coordinators of starch and SSP accumulation[109111]. Ectopic expression of NAC-A18 in rice dramatically decreased the starch content and increased the SSP content, grain size and weight. Moreover, NAC-A18 can upregulate the expression of TaLMW-D6 and TaLMW-D1 by binding directly to their promoters and suppressing the expression of TaGBSSI-A1 and TaGBSSI-A2. TaNAC019 binds to specific motifs in the promoters of TaGlu-1Bx, TaGlu-1By, TaGlu-1Dx, TaSuSy1, and TaSSIIa and positively regulates their expression. Compared to those of the wild type, the triple mutant of three homeologous TaNAC019 exhibits lower gluten contents and smaller grain sizes with shorter grain widths and lengths[109]. In contrast, TaNAC100 negatively regulates the expression of GLU-1 through binding to its promoter. Overexpression of TaNAC100 suppresses Bx14, By15 and Dx2 expression and further decreases their protein levels[110]. Similarly, the TF TaB3-2A1 binds to the cis-element CCRM1-1 in the promoter of GLU-1. TaB3-2A1 overexpression significantly reduces the contents of HMW-GSs and other seed storage proteins but increases the starch content, leading to increased grain size, including grain length and width[112]. Another B3-superfamily TF, TaFUSCA3, interacts with TaSPA and subsequently activates Bx7 by binding to its promoter[113].

      Although the abovementioned genes independently and coordinately regulate the contents of starch and SSPs, the intricate mechanisms underlying their regulatory pathway still need to be determined to accumulate additional genetic resources for genome-wide target editing.

    • Grain size is a key agronomic trait in crop breeding. In recent decades, there has been exciting progress in research on grain size development in rice. Studies in wheat suggest that some grain size regulators have conserved functions in rice and other plants[32, 34, 35, 114116]. However, many of the observed associations in wheat remain unconfirmed by experiments. Often, a homolog of the rice grain size regulatory gene is found in a grain trait QTL by GWAS in wheat. It is often difficult to experimentally validate whether a favorable haplotype indeed promotes a grain trait in wheat, as often only a single SNP exists between two haplotypes, and we still cannot edit the genome precisely to reconstruct the haplotype in the desired genetic background. On the other hand, overexpression of an allele could lead to misleading results. Because of these difficulties, we sometimes know much about a wheat homolog of a rice grain regulator, including its interacting proteins and binding promoters, in the case of TFs; however, no solid data confirming its role in regulating a seed trait, such as for its rice homolog, have yet been obtained. Therefore, our understanding of wheat grain traits heavily relies on knowledge from rice, and the proposed roles of genes often need validation. For grain trait regulators that are not conserved in rice or have not yet been found in rice, we know little about these regulators in wheat. In addition, as an allopolyploid crop, bread wheat exhibits complex genetic regulation. For example, the effect of TaGW2-B1 on grain size is significantly greater than that of TaGW2-D1, and the grain sizes of double mutants are substantially greater than those of single mutants[34]. The interactions among subgenomes need to be elucidated, especially by utilizing improved genetic transformation and editing technology.

      Like for other crops, maintaining a balance in yield components are essential for improving wheat yield. Many seed trait QTLs or genes exhibit intensive genetic trade-offs between grain size/weight and seed number, which substantially impedes the utilization of these genes[117]. Only a few genes, such as TaGSNE in wheat and OsOTUB1, OsSGL, and OsAGSW1 in rice, have been found to simultaneously increase both grain size and number and hold promise to improve wheat yield[40, 118, 119]. Recently, overexpression of an α-expansin gene specifically in early developing grain led to a significant increase in grain size without a negative effect on grain number, resulting in an increase in yield under field conditions[120]. Similarly, targeted expression of TaCYP78A5 in integument also enhances grain weight without negative effects on grain number per spike. Therefore, modifying the expression of genes in specific organs, developmental periods, or biogenesis steps may be a feasible way to overcome the trade-off between the grain size/weight and grain number.

      Additionally, grain size and weight usually have a negative correlation with grain quality, as indicated by the protein content and end-use quality[4]. Therefore, synergetic improvement of grain yield and end-use quality is also a goal for wheat breeding. In rice, both OsPPKL1 (qGL3/GL3.1) and TGW6 influence grain size but have no significant influence on grain quality[56, 62], which are potentially useful for improving grain weight and quality. Additionally, some TFs can regulate the contents of starch and SSPs by binding directly to the promoters of related genes, such as TaNAC019 andNAC-A18[109, 111]. Therefore, identifying additional genes that regulate grain size development and SSPs is still an effective way to coordinately improve grain size, weight, and quality.

    • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: draft manuscript preparation: Wei B, Jiao Y. Both authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

    • Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

      • This work was supported by the Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (ZR202211070163); the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2021ZD30 and ZR2022ZD22), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32072061, 31921005 and 32230010), and National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0903900 and 2023YFE0101100).

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Yuling Jiao is the Editorial Board member of Seed Biology who was blinded from reviewing or making decisions on the manuscript. The article was subject to the journal's standard procedures, with peer-review handled independently of this Editorial Board member and the research groups.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press on behalf of Hainan Yazhou Bay Seed Laboratory. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (1)  References (120)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Wei B, Jiao Y. 2024. Grain size control in wheat: toward a molecular understanding. Seed Biology 3: e007 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0024-0007
    Wei B, Jiao Y. 2024. Grain size control in wheat: toward a molecular understanding. Seed Biology 3: e007 doi: 10.48130/seedbio-0024-0007

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return