Search
2024 Volume 4
Article Contents
REVIEW   Open Access    

Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and its potential for crop diversification and sustainable food production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review

More Information
  • Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] is an important tropical legume mainly cultivated in South and East Asia but remains a minor grain legume in Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA). It has considerable potential for improving soil fertility and enhancing food security for smallholder farmers. Mungbean's short-duration growth cycle, symbiotic atmospheric nitrogen fixation, adaptation to hot and drought conditions, and low input requirements, make it suitable for rain-fed smallholder production systems of SSA. Its versatility as a short-duration crop makes it an ideal candidate for crop diversification, providing smallholder farmers with an additional income source and improving resilience against climate variability, which could contribute to promoting long-term agricultural sustainability. Having similar nutritional content to cowpea and dry beans, mungbean could perform better under semi-arid conditions due to its lower rate of flower and pod abscission. The legume is an important source of protein, carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins and has lower phytic acid content than other legumes and staple cereals in SSA. Mungbean seeds can be eaten with cereals, processed to make dhals, sprouts, noodles, soups, desserts, and protein- and iron-rich supplements for children. This review highlights the agronomic traits of mungbean, focusing on its biological and ecological characteristics, its positive effects on soil health and the environment, as well as its nutritional and health benefits in SSA. Additionally, it discusses the key challenges to mungbean production in the region. The paper explores the use of genetic resources and genomic tools to enhance mungbean varieties' productivity and adaptability in SSA.
  • 加载中
  • [1]

    HanumanthaRao B, Nair RM, Nayyar H. 2016. Salinity and high temperature tolerance in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] from a physiological perspective. Frontiers in Plant Science 7:957

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00957

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [2]

    Kaur R, Bains TS, Bindumadhava H, Nayyar H. 2015. Responses of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) genotypes to heat stress: effects on reproductive biology, leaf function and yield traits. Scientia Horticulturae 197:527−41

    doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2015.10.015

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [3]

    Van K, Kang Y, Han KS, Lee YH, Gwag JG, et al. 2013. Genome-wide SNP discovery in mungbean by Illumina HiSeq. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 126:2017−27

    doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2114-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [4]

    Stefanović S, Pfeil BE, Palmer JD, Doyle JJ. 2009. Relationships among phaseoloid legumes based on sequences from eight chloroplast regions. Systematic Botany 34:115−28

    doi: 10.1600/036364409787602221

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [5]

    Sakai H, Naito K, Takahashi Y, Sato T, Yamamoto T, et al. 2016. The Vigna Genome Server, 'Vig GS': a genomic knowledge base of the genus Vigna based on high-quality, annotated genome sequence of the Azuki Bean, Vigna angularis (Willd.) Ohwi & Ohashi. Plant and Cell Physiology 57:e2

    doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcv189

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [6]

    Kang YJ, Kim SK, Kim MY, Lestari P, Kim KH, et al. 2014. Genome sequence of mungbean and insights into evolution within Vigna species. Nature Communications 5:5443

    doi: 10.1038/ncomms6443

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [7]

    Raina SK, Govindasamy V, Kumar M, Singh AK, Rane J, et al. 2016. Genetic variation in physiological responses of mungbeans (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) to drought. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 38:263

    doi: 10.1007/s11738-016-2280-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [8]

    CABI. 2022. Vigna radiata (mung bean). CABI Compendium 2022:cabicompendium.40616

    doi: 10.1079/cabicompendium.40616

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [9]

    Reynolds TW, Waddington SR, Anderson CL, Chew A, True Z, et al. 2015. Environmental impacts and constraints associated with the production of major food crops in Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Food Security 7:795−822

    doi: 10.1007/s12571-015-0478-1

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [10]

    Connolly-Boutin L, Smit B. 2016. Climate change, food security, and livelihoods in sub-Saharan Africa. Regional Environmental Change 16:385−99

    doi: 10.1007/s10113-015-0761-x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [11]

    Zewdie A. 2014. Impacts of climate change on food security: a literature review in Sub Saharan Africa. Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change 5:225

    doi: 10.4172/2157-7617.1000225

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [12]

    Smartt J. 1984. Gene pools in grain legumes. Economic Botany 38:24−35

    doi: 10.1007/BF02904413

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [13]

    Mogotsi KK. 2006. Vigna radiata (L.) R. Wilczek. In PROTA 1: Cereals and pulses/Céréales et légumes secs, eds Brink M, Belay G. Wageningen, Netherlands: PROTA.

    [14]

    Foyer CH, Lam HM, Nguyen HT, Siddique KHM, Varshney RK, et al. 2016. Neglecting legumes has compromised human health and sustainable food production. Nature Plants 2:16112

    doi: 10.1038/nplants.2016.112

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [15]

    Kumar S, Kumar R. 2014. Genetic improvement in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L). Wilzeck] for yield, nutrition and resistance to stresses - a review. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 32:683−87

    Google Scholar

    [16]

    International Market Analysis Research and Consulting (IMARC). 2018. Global mung beans market driven by various health benefits and multiple uses in the food industry. (Accessed on April 18, 2018). www.imarcgroup.com/global-mung-beans-market

    [17]

    Keatinge JDH, Easdown WJ, Yang RY, Chadha ML, Shanmugasundaram S. 2011. Overcoming chronic malnutrition in a future warming world: the key importance of mungbean and vegetable soybean. Euphytica 180:129−41

    doi: 10.1007/s10681-011-0401-6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [18]

    Diatta AA, Thomason WE, Abaye O, Vaughan LJ, Thompson TL, et al. 2018. Inoculation and soil texture effects on yield and yield components of mungbean. Journal of Agricultural Science 10:6−16

    doi: 10.5539/jas.v10n9p6

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [19]

    Shah Z, Shah SH, Peoples MB, Schwenke GD, Herridge DF. 2003. Crop residue and fertiliser N effects on nitrogen fixation and yields of legume–cereal rotations and soil organic fertility. Field Crops Research 83:1−11

    doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00005-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [20]

    Mohammad W, Shehzadi S, Shah SM, Shah Z. 2010. Effect of tillage and crop residues management on mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) crop yield, nitrogen fixation and water use efficiency in rainfed areas. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42:1781−89

    Google Scholar

    [21]

    Delfin EF, Paterno ES, Torres FG, Santos PJA. 2008. Biomass, nitrogen uptake and fixed nitrogen partitioningin field grown mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) inoculated with Bradyrhizobium sp. Philippine Journal of Crop Science 33:24−33

    Google Scholar

    [22]

    Rosales C, Rivera F, Hautea R, Del Rosario E. 1998. Field evaluation of N2 fixation by mung bean in the Philippines, and residual effects on maize. Technical Report. IAEA-TECDOC-1027, Joint FAO/IAEA Division of Nuclear Techniques in Food and Agriculture, Vienna, Austria. www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/634524

    [23]

    George T, Ladha JK, Garrity DP, Torres RO. 1995. Nitrogen dynamics of grain legume-weedy fallow-flooded rice sequences in the tropics. Agronomy Journal 87:1−6

    doi: 10.2134/agronj1995.00021962008700010001x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [24]

    Rosales C, Rivera F, Hautia R, Del Rosario E. 1995. Nitrogen fixation by mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) under field conditions in the Philippines as quantified by 15N isotope dilution. Technical Report. PNRI-C(AG)-95001, Philippine Nuclear Research Inst., Diliman, Quezon City, Philippines. www.osti.gov/etdeweb/biblio/130437

    [25]

    Phoomthaisong J, Toomsan B, Limpinuntana V, Cadisch G, Patanothai A. 2003. Attributes affecting residual benefits of N2-fixing mungbean and groundnut cultivars. Biology and Fertility of Soils 39:16−24

    doi: 10.1007/s00374-003-0676-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [26]

    Toomsan B, Cadisch G, Srichantawong M, Thongsodsaeng C, Giller KE, et al. 2000. Biological N2 fixation and residual N benefit of pre-rice leguminous crops and green manures. NJAS: Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 48:19−29

    doi: 10.1016/S1573-5214(00)80002-0

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [27]

    Rochester IJ, Peoples MB, Constable GA, Gault RR. 1998. Faba beans and other legumes add nitrogen to irrigated cotton cropping systems. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 38:253−60

    doi: 10.1071/EA97132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [28]

    Raji SG, Tzanakakis V, Dörsch P. 2019. Bradyrhizobial inoculation and P application effects on haricot and mung beans in the Ethiopian Rift Valley. Plant and Soil 442:271−84

    doi: 10.1007/s11104-019-04170-2

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [29]

    Umair A, Ali S, Hayat R, Ansar M, Tareen MJ. 2011. Evaluation of seed priming in mung bean (Vigna radiata) for yield, nodulation and biological nitrogen fixation under rainfed conditions. African Journal of Biotechnology 10:18122−29

    doi: 10.5897/AJB11.1385

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [30]

    Hayat R, Ali S. 2004. Potential of summer legumes to fix nitrogen and benefit wheat crop under rainfed condition. Journal of Agronomy 3:273−81

    doi: 10.3923/ja.2004.273.281

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [31]

    Peoples MB, Bergersen FJ, Turner GL, Sampet C, Rerkasem B, et al. 1991. Use of the natural enrichment of 15N in plant available soil N for the measurement of symbiotic N2 fixation. In Stable Isotopes in Plant Nutrition, Soil Fertility and Environmental Studies. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria. pp. 117−28

    [32]

    Ali S, Hasan A, Ijaz SS, Ansar M. 2013. Mungbean (Vigna radiata) yield and di-nitrogen fixation under minimum tillage at semi arid Pothwar, Pakistan. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 23:198−202

    Google Scholar

    [33]

    Hayat R, Ali S. 2010. Nitrogen fixation of legumes and yield of wheat under legumes-wheat rotation in Pothwar. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42:2317−26

    Google Scholar

    [34]

    Hayat R, Ali S, Ijaz SS, Hussain T, Chatha, et al. 2008. Estimation of N2-fixation of mung bean and mash bean through xylem uriede technique under rainfed conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 40:723−34

    Google Scholar

    [35]

    Tariq S, Ali S, Ijaz SS. 2007. Improving nitrogen fixation capacity and yield of mungbean and mashbean by phosphorous management in Pothowar. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 23:1027−32

    Google Scholar

    [36]

    Unkovich M, Herridge D, Peoples M, Cadisch G, Boddey B, et al. 2008. Measuring plant-associated nitrogen fixation in agricultural systems. Australia: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR).

    [37]

    Mbeyagala EK, Kwikiriza N, Amayo R, Omadi JR, Okwang D, et al. 2017. Participatory selection of mungbean genotypes in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal 25:253−62

    doi: 10.4314/acsj.v25i2.9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [38]

    Nair R, Schafleitner R, Kenyon L, Srinivasan R, Easdown W, et al. 2012. Genetic improvement of mungbean. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 44:177−90

    Google Scholar

    [39]

    Waniale A, Wanyera N, Talwana H. 2014. Morphological and agronomic traits variations for mungbean variety selection and improvement in Uganda. African Crop Science Journal 22:123−36

    Google Scholar

    [40]

    Herridge DF, Robertson MJ, Cocks B, Peoples MB, Holland JF, et al. 2005. Low nodulation and nitrogen fixation of mungbean reduce biomass and grain yields. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45:269−77

    doi: 10.1071/EA03130

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [41]

    FAOSTAT. 2024. Crops: production quantity. (Accessed on 03 August 2024). Available online: www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC

    [42]

    Oo HH, Araki T, Kubota F. 2005. Effects of drought and flooding stresses on growth and photosynthetic activity of mungbean, Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek, cultivars. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture 50:533−42

    doi: 10.5109/4667

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [43]

    Diatta AA, Bassène C, Manga AGB, Abaye O, Thomason W, et al. 2023. Integrated use of organic amendments increased mungbean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) yield and its components compared to inorganic fertilizers. Urban Agriculture & Regional Food Systems 8:e20048

    doi: 10.1002/uar2.20048

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [44]

    Wahid F, Sharif M, Fahad S, Adnan M, Khan IA, et al. 2019. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi improve the growth and phosphorus uptake of mung bean plants fertilized with composted rock phosphate fed dung in alkaline soil environment. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42:1760−69

    doi: 10.1080/01904167.2019.1643371

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [45]

    Zang H, Yang X, Feng X, Qian X, Hu Y, et al. 2015. Rhizodeposition of nitrogen and carbon by mungbean (Vigna radiata L. ) and its contribution to intercropped oats (Avena nuda L.). PLoS One 10:e0121132

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [46]

    Thomas GA, Dalal RC, Weston EJ, King AJ, Holmes CJ, et al. 2010. Crop rotations for sustainable grain production on a Vertisol in the semi-arid subtropics. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture 35:2−26

    doi: 10.1080/10440046.2011.530195

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [47]

    Sekhon HS, Bains TS, Kooner BS, Sharma P. 2006. Grow summer mungbean for improving crop sustainability, farm income and malnutrition. Acta Horticulturae 752:459−64

    doi: 10.17660/ACTAHORTIC.2007.752.83

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [48]

    Moswetsi G, Fanadzo M, Ncube B. 2017. Cropping systems and agronomic management practices in smallholder farms in South Africa: constraints, challenges and opportunities. Journal of Agronomy 16:51−64

    doi: 10.3923/ja.2017.51.64

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [49]

    Trail P, Abaye O, Thomason WE, Thompson TL, Gueye F, et al. 2016. Evaluating intercropping (living cover) and mulching (desiccated cover) practices for increasing millet yields in Senegal. Agronomy Journal 108:1742−52

    doi: 10.2134/agronj2015.0422

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [50]

    Kumar N, Bairwa RC, Khinchi V, Meena RK, Sharma R. 2017. Evaluation of yield attributes and yield on pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) and mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) intercropping system under arid western plain zone of India. International Journal of Pure & Applied Bioscience 5:400−03

    doi: 10.18782/2320-7051.5329

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [51]

    Ghilotia YK, Meena RN, Singh L. 2014. Pearlmillet and mungbean intercropping as influenced by various row ratios under custard apple orchard of Vindhyan region. The Bioscan 10:87−91

    Google Scholar

    [52]

    Shaker-Koohi S, Nasrollahzadeh S, Raei Y. 2014. Evaluation of chlorophyll value, protein content and yield of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)/mungbean (Vigna radiate L.) intercropping. International Journal of Biosciences (IJB) 4:136−43

    doi: 10.12692/ijb/4.8.136-143

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [53]

    Ur Rehman O, Rashid M, Kausar R, Alvi S, Sajjad MR. 2015. Assessment of runoff and sediment losses under different slope gradients and crop covers in semi-arid watersheds. Soil & Environment 34:78−81

    Google Scholar

    [54]

    Dwivedi A, Singh A, Naresh RK, Kumar M, Kumar V, et al. 2016. Towards sustainable intensification of maize (Zea mays L.) + legume intercropping systems; experiences; challenges and opportunities in India; a critical review. Journal of Pure and Applied Microbiology 10:725−41

    Google Scholar

    [55]

    Shahida B, Khan IA. 2016. Impact of weed control techniques on intercropping of mungbean with maize under agro climate condition of Peshawar. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 32:62−69

    doi: 10.17582/journal.sja/2016/32.2.62.69

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [56]

    Lu YH, Wu KM, Wyckhuys KAG, Guo YY . 2009. Potential of mungbean, Vigna radiatus as a trap crop for managing Apolygus lucorum (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Bt cotton. Crop Protection 28:77−81

    doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2008.08.018

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [57]

    Geng H, Pan H, Lu Y, Yang Y. 2012. Nymphal and adult performance of Apolygus lucorum (Hemiptera: Miridae) on a preferred host plant, mungbean Vigna radiata. Applied Entomology and Zoology 47:191−97

    doi: 10.1007/s13355-012-0107-9

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [58]

    Wang Q, Bao WF, Yang F, Xu B, Yang YZ. 2017. The specific host plant DNA detection suggests a potential migration of Apolygus lucorum from cotton to mungbean fields. PLoS One 12:e0177789

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177789

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [59]

    Ganesan K, Xu B. 2017. A critical review on phytochemical profile and health promoting effects of mung bean (Vigna radiata). Food Science and Human Wellness 7:11−33

    doi: 10.1016/j.fshw.2017.11.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [60]

    Dahiya PK, Linnemann AR, Van Boekel MAJS, Khetarpaul N, Grewal RB, et al. 2015. Mung bean: technological and nutritional potential. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 55:670−88

    doi: 10.1080/10408398.2012.671202

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [61]

    United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2010. National Nutrient Database. www.nal.usda.gov/fnic/foodcomp/search

    [62]

    Kumar A, Sharma S, Sital JS, Singh S. 2013. Effect of sulfur and nitrogen nutrition on storage protein quality in mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] seeds. Indian Journal of Agricultural Biochemistry 26:86−91

    Google Scholar

    [63]

    Gupta YP. 1987. Anti-nutritional and toxic factors in food legumes: a review. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 37:201−28

    doi: 10.1007/BF01091786

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [64]

    Dhole VJ, Reddy KS. 2015. Genetic variation for phytic acid content in mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek). The Crop Journal 3:157−62

    doi: 10.1016/j.cj.2014.12.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [65]

    Kumar Dahiya P, Nout MJR, van Boekel MA, Khetarpaul N, Bala Grewal R, et al. 2014. Nutritional characteristics of mung bean foods. British Food Journal 116:1031−46

    doi: 10.1108/BFJ-11-2012-0280

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [66]

    Puranik V, Mishra V, Singh N, Rai GK. 2011. Studies on development of protein rich germinated green gram pickle and its preservation by using class one preservatives. American Journal of Food Technology 6:742−52

    doi: 10.3923/ajft.2011.742.752

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [67]

    Nair RM, Yang RY, Easdown WJ, Thavarajah D, Thavarajah P, et al. 2013. Biofortification of mungbean (Vigna radiata) as a whole food to enhance human health. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 93:1805−13

    doi: 10.1002/jsfa.6110

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [68]

    Anwar F, Latif S, Przybylski R, Sultana B, Ashraf M. 2007. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of seeds of different cultivars of mungbean. Journal of Food Science 72:S503−S510

    doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2007.00462.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [69]

    Chitra U, Vimala V, Singh U, Geervani P. 1995. Variability in phytic acid content and protein digestibility of grain legumes. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 47:163−72

    doi: 10.1007/BF01089266

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [70]

    Bhardwaj HL, Rangappa M, Hamama AA. 1999. Chickpea, faba bean, lupin, mungbean, and pigeonpea: potential new crops for the Mid-Atlantic Region of the United States. In Perspectives on New Crops and New Uses, ed. Janick J. Alexandria, VA: ASHS Press. pp. 202−05. www.hort.purdue.edu/newcrop/proceedings1999/pdf/bhar-leg.pdf

    [71]

    Dhayal BL, Patel CR, Mehta BM. 2015. A study on constraints perceived by the farmers in adoption of moongbean production technology in Vadodara and Chhotaudaipur district of Gujarat. Agriculture Update 10:343−50

    doi: 10.15740/HAS/AU/10.4/343-350

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [72]

    Diatta AA, Abaye O, Thomason WE, Lo M, Guèye F, et al. 2019. Effect of intercropping mungbean on millet yield in the Peanut basin, Senegal. Innovations Agronomiques 74:69−81

    Google Scholar

    [73]

    Akaerue BI, Onwuka GI. 2005. The proximate composition, physical qualities, sensory attributes and microbial load of mungbean biscuits as affected by processing. Journal of Emerging Trends in Engineering and Applied Sciences 4:250−57

    Google Scholar

    [74]

    Abaye AO, Archibald TG, Vaughan L, Thompson TL, Thomason WE, et al. 2018. Internationalizing the land grant mission: lessons from Senegal. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech, US.

    [75]

    Vashro TN. 2017. The effect of mung bean on improving dietary diversity in women and children in Senegal. Thesis. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and StateUniversity, US.

    [76]

    Chadha M. 2001. Mungbean (Vigna radiata L.), a choice crop for improvement of human and soil health in southern Africa. In Combating Desertification with Plants, eds Pasternak D, Schlissel A. Boston, MA: Springer. pp. 263–71. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4615-1327-8_25

    [77]

    Imtiaz H, BurhanUddin M, Gulzar MA. 2011. Evaluation of weaning foods formulated from germinated wheat and mungbean from Bangladesh. African Journal of Food Science 5:897−903

    doi: 10.5897/AJFS11.180

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [78]

    Akaerue BI, Onwuka GI. 2010. Evaluation of the yield, protein content and functional properties of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] protein isolates as affected by processing. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 9:728−35

    doi: 10.3923/pjn.2010.728.735

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [79]

    Tang D, Dong Y, Ren H, Li L, He C. 2014. A review of phytochemistry, metabolite changes, and medicinal uses of the common food mung bean and its sprouts (Vigna radiata). Chemistry Central Journal 8:4

    doi: 10.1186/1752-153X-8-4

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [80]

    Cao D, Li H, Yi J, Zhang J, Che H, et al. 2011. Antioxidant properties of the mung bean flavonoids on alleviating heat stress. PLoS One 6:e21071

    doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021071

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [81]

    Sherasia P, Garg MR, Babulal B, Calles T. 2017. Pulses and their by-products as animal feed, eds Calles T, Makkar H. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Canada.

    [82]

    Rao SC, Northup BK. 2009. Capabilities of four novel warm-season legumes in the southern Great Plains: biomass and forage quality. Crop Science 49:1096−102

    doi: 10.2135/cropsci2008.08.0499

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [83]

    Lambrides CJ, Godwin ID. 2007. Mungbean. In Pulses, Sugar and Tuber Crops, vol 3. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. pp 69–90. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-34516-9_4

    [84]

    Amin M, Karim MA, Islam MR, Aktar S, Hossain MA. 2016. Effect of flooding on growth and yield of mungbean genotypes. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 41:151−62

    doi: 10.3329/bjar.v41i1.27680

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [85]

    Lalinia AA, Hoseini NM, Galostian M, Bahabadi SE, Khameneh MM. 2012. Echophysiological impact of water stress on growth and development of mungbean. International Journal of Agronomy and Plant Production 3:599−607

    Google Scholar

    [86]

    Lal SS. 1985. A review of insect pests of mungbean and their control in India. Tropical Pest Management 31:105−14

    doi: 10.1080/09670878509370960

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [87]

    Swaminathan R, Singh K, Nepalia V. 2012. Insect pests of green gram Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek and their management. In Agricultural Science. ed. Aflakpui G. UK: InTech. pp. 197−222. www.intechopen.com/books/agricultural-science/insect-pests-of-green-gram-vigna-radiata-l-wilczek-and-their-management

    [88]

    Dubey SC, Singh B. 2013. Integrated management of major diseases of mungbean by seed treatment and foliar application of insecticide, fungicides and bioagent. Crop Protection 47:55−60

    doi: 10.1016/j.cropro.2012.12.025

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [89]

    Anjum T, Gupta KS, Datta S. 2010. Mapping of mungbean yellow mosaic India virus (MYMIV) and powdery mildew resistant gene in black gram [Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper]. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 1:1148−52

    Google Scholar

    [90]

    Nair RM, Pandey AK, War AR, Hanumantharao B, Shwe T, et al. 2019. Biotic and abiotic constraints in mungbean production—progress in genetic improvement. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1340

    doi: 10.3389/fpls.2019.01340

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [91]

    Ali S, Khan MA, Zeshan MA, Habib A, Haider MS. 2015. Characterization of conducive environmental conditions for mungbean yellow mosaic virus disease incidence on mungbean germplasm. Pakistan Journal of Phytopathology 27:27−30

    Google Scholar

    [92]

    Munawwar MH, Ali A, Malik SR. 2014. Identification of resistance in mungbean and mashbean germplasm against mungbean yellow mosaic virus. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research 27:129−35

    Google Scholar

    [93]

    Suman S, Sharma VK, Kumar H, Shahi VK. 2015. Screening of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes for resistance to mungbean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV). Environment & Ecology 33:855−59

    Google Scholar

    [94]

    Akibode CS. 2011. Trends in the production, trade, and consumption of food legume crops in Sub-Saharan Africa. Thesis. Michigan State University, US. 85 pp. doi: 10.22004/ag.econ.114247

    [95]

    Diatta AA, Min D, Jagadish SVK. 2021. Drought stress responses in non-transgenic and transgenic alfalfa—current status and future research directions. Advances in Agronomy 170:35−100

    doi: 10.1016/bs.agron.2021.06.002

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [96]

    Terdoo F, Feola G. 2016. The vulnerability of rice value chains in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Climate 4:47

    doi: 10.3390/cli4030047

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [97]

    Tirado MC, Hunnes D, Cohen MJ, Lartey A. 2015. Climate change and nutrition in Africa. Journal of Hunger & Environmental Nutrition 10:22−46

    doi: 10.1080/19320248.2014.908447

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [98]

    Brooker RW, Bennett AE, Cong WF, Daniell TJ, George TS, et al. 2015. Improving intercropping: a synthesis of research in agronomy, plant physiology and ecology. New Phytologist 206:107−17

    doi: 10.1111/nph.13132

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [99]

    Lal R, Singh BR, Mwaseba DL, Kraybill D, Hansen DO, et al. 2015. Sustainable intensification to advance food security and enhance climate resilience in Africa. Switzerland, Heidelberg: Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-09360-4

    [100]

    Odeny DA. 2007. The potential of pigeonpea (Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp.) in Africa. Natural Resources Forum 31:297−305

    doi: 10.1111/j.1477-8947.2007.00157.x

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [101]

    Shishaye HA. 2015. The negative impacts of climate change in Sub-Saharan Africa and their mitigation measures. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology 11:1−9

    doi: 10.9734/BJAST/2015/17665

    CrossRef   Google Scholar

    [102]

    Diatta AA, Ndour N, Manga A, Sambou B, Faye CS, et al. 2016. Floristic composition and dynamics of Cordyla pinnata (Lepr. ex A. Rich.) Milne-Redh. agroforestry parkland of Senegal's South Peanut Basin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 10:1805−22

    Google Scholar

  • Cite this article

    Diatta AA, Abaye O, Battaglia ML, Leme JFDC, Seleiman M, et al. 2024. Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and its potential for crop diversification and sustainable food production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Technology in Agronomy 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/tia-0024-0030
    Diatta AA, Abaye O, Battaglia ML, Leme JFDC, Seleiman M, et al. 2024. Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and its potential for crop diversification and sustainable food production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Technology in Agronomy 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/tia-0024-0030

Figures(2)  /  Tables(4)

Article Metrics

Article views(536) PDF downloads(365)

REVIEW   Open Access    

Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and its potential for crop diversification and sustainable food production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review

Technology in Agronomy  4 Article number: e031  (2024)  |  Cite this article

Abstract: Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] is an important tropical legume mainly cultivated in South and East Asia but remains a minor grain legume in Sub-Sahara Africa (SSA). It has considerable potential for improving soil fertility and enhancing food security for smallholder farmers. Mungbean's short-duration growth cycle, symbiotic atmospheric nitrogen fixation, adaptation to hot and drought conditions, and low input requirements, make it suitable for rain-fed smallholder production systems of SSA. Its versatility as a short-duration crop makes it an ideal candidate for crop diversification, providing smallholder farmers with an additional income source and improving resilience against climate variability, which could contribute to promoting long-term agricultural sustainability. Having similar nutritional content to cowpea and dry beans, mungbean could perform better under semi-arid conditions due to its lower rate of flower and pod abscission. The legume is an important source of protein, carbohydrates, minerals, and vitamins and has lower phytic acid content than other legumes and staple cereals in SSA. Mungbean seeds can be eaten with cereals, processed to make dhals, sprouts, noodles, soups, desserts, and protein- and iron-rich supplements for children. This review highlights the agronomic traits of mungbean, focusing on its biological and ecological characteristics, its positive effects on soil health and the environment, as well as its nutritional and health benefits in SSA. Additionally, it discusses the key challenges to mungbean production in the region. The paper explores the use of genetic resources and genomic tools to enhance mungbean varieties' productivity and adaptability in SSA.

    • Vigna radiata (known as mung beans or green gram) is an important legume crop in the semi-arid tropics of Asia, Africa, Southern Europe, and Central and Southern America. Worldwide, mungbean is cultivated on more than 6 million ha[1]. The species is a self-pollinated diploid (2n = 22), erect plant with branches carrying pods (8−15 seed grains) in clusters near the top of the plant (Fig. 1)[2], belonging to the Papilionoideae in the Fabaceae[3]. It belongs to the Phaseoleae tribe, which contains soybean (Glycine max) and cowpea (Vigna unguiculata)[4]. The genus Vigna includes more than 100 species in three sub-specific taxa: radiata (green grams and golden grams including the cultivated mungbean), sublobata, and glabra[5]. Ninety percent of global production occurs in south, East, and Southeast Asia[6]. India represents the largest producer of mungbean worldwide followed by China and Myanmar. India's annual mungbean production is estimated to be around 3 M Mg, which represents over 50% of the total world production. Because of both the limited increase in mungbean production over the past years combined with limited access to high-quality seeds, current demand is high in India. Myanmar (83%), Tanzania (4%), Kenya (4%), Australia (3%), and Mozambique (2%) exports mungbean to India[7]. More than 50 improved mung bean varieties were released by India between 1985 and 2010, using extensive hybridization and selection, irradiation and selection. Most of these varieties are short duration (60−70 d), uniform maturity, high yield, and combined resistance to powdery mildew and/or mung bean yellow mosaic virus (MYMV). Few varieties have a maturity of 75 to 90 d and are intended for planting as winter or spring rice (Oryza sativa L.) fallows.

      Figure 1. 

      (a) Mungbean seeds, (b) flower, (c) developing pods, and (d) field crop[8].

      Mungbeans have low water and input requirements and wide adaptability into crop rotations, making it a potentially promising way to increase crop production under adverse soil, water, and climatic conditions. Their adaptation to stable performance in marginal environments has led to limited yield potential, which hampers its response to more favorable environments and improved cultural practices. They are mainly grown on small farms and in the tropical monsoon region, where they are used as a rainy-season crop on arid land or as a dry-season crop on wet land after the monsoon, using rice-based methods with residual moisture or supplementary irrigation. It is possible to plant an early-season crop before the monsoon in some areas where rainfall is sufficient. Mungbeans can produce reasonable yields in drought-prone areas such as SSA with as little as 650 mm of yearly precipitation. However, heavy rainfall leads to excessive vegetative growth and decreased pod formation and development. It is well-known that a range of biotic and abiotic constraints of natural origin, such as soil poverty, water scarcity, crop pests, diseases, and weeds, as well as inappropriate temperatures, reduce the productivity of food crops[9]. This results in less efficient use of inputs, lower agricultural production, and, ultimately, reduced food security in developing countries. However, there is growing concern that agricultural practices themselves, whether intensification systems, common in South Asia, or extensive systems, common in sub-Saharan Africa, are exacerbating the biotic and abiotic constraints on food production by having adverse effects on the environment[9]. In Sub-Saharan Africa, where reside the world's most vulnerable food production systems, recurrent droughts are projected to increase in frequency and intensity[10,11]. As a result of this, 60 to 90 million ha could be transformed into new arid and semi-arid areas in the following years, hence threatening future food security scenarios. In such a prospective scenario, a highly nutritious crop such as mungbean that can sustain high yield under mid to accentuated drought conditions, deserves special consideration for food security.

    • Genetic diversity data and archaeological studies revealed mungbean to be a native crop of India and the Indo-Burma region, where the early domestication and cultivation processes began 4,000–6,000 years ago. This initial assertion has been suggested by several authors, due to morphological diversity and the existence of weedy and wild varieties. From India and the Indo-Burma region, the domesticated mung bean has mainly spread through several routes in Southeast and East Asia. Later, the selection of species resulted in the introduction of cultivated types of mungbean by oriental emigrants or by traders to the Middle East, Africa, Latin and South America, and Australia[12]. Today, the modern mungbean varieties developed from several cycles of domestication and selection are currently found in Austronesia, Africa, and South and East Asia. In Africa, mungbean cultivation has been reported in at least 22 countries but remains a minor crop in the continent, except in Kenya where it represents a valuable source of protein, nutrients, and income for rural communities[13]. The available, limited mungbean literature for SSA highlights the importance of investigating the potential of mungbean production (Table 1).

      Table 1.  Estimates of fixed N by mungbean in field trials.

      Country N fixed
      (kg N ha−1)
      N method used* Ref.
      Pakistan 55–86 N balance [19]
      Pakistan 35–83 15N isotope dilution [20]
      Philippines 25–47 15N isotope dilution [21]
      Philippines 21–85 15N isotope dilution [22]
      Philippines 61–90 15N isotope dilution [23]
      Philippines 21–85 15N isotope dilution [24]
      Thailand 35–50 15N isotope dilution [25]
      Thailand 10 15N isotope dilution [26]
      Australia 20–83 15N natural abundance [27]
      Ethiopia 8–25 15N natural abundance [28]
      Pakistan 32–46 15N natural abundance [29]
      Pakistan 41 15N natural abundance [30]
      Thailand 64–66 15N natural abundance [31]
      Pakistan 6–32 Ureide [32]
      Pakistan 17–47 Ureide [33]
      Pakistan 55 Ureide [30]
      Pakistan 19–47 Ureide [34]
      Pakistan 13–26 Ureide [35]
      * See Unkovich et al.[36] for description of techniques for measuring biological N2 fixation.

      Vigna radiata var. sublobata is believed to be the wild progenitor of mungbean, which is a popular legume grown for its edible seeds. This wild variety is found in various regions expanding from Central Asia, Central and East Africa, Madagascar, through Asia, New Guinea, to North and East Australia, where it thrives in diverse climates and soil conditions. Researchers are studying the genetic diversity of Vigna radiata var. sublobata to better understand its potential for improving mungbean cultivation and developing more resilient varieties for future agricultural practices.

      Furthermore, the high protein, mineral, and vitamin contents of mungbean represent an opportunity for improving nutrition security in SSA. However, while mungbean has played an important role in improving soil fertility and sustaining the livelihood and nutritional security of smallholder farmers in other regions, it represents an understudied crop in SSA[14]. Mungbean is a tropical food legume that has an optimum temperature range for growth of 28−30 °C. It is extensively grown in the regions of South and East Asia that are prone to drought and high temperatures[7,15]. Global annual production of mungbean in 2017 was estimated to be approximately 2.7 M Mg, which represented about 3% of global pulse production that year[16]. Mungbean global production expected to be 3.2 M Mg by 2023 which represents a 15% increase due to an increased demand from the food industry[16].

      Improved mungbean varieties reach maturity in 60 to 65 d[17] while traditional varieties mature in 65 to 90 d[1]. Mungbean varieties have determinate growth but flower and fruit over a period of several weeks (Fig. 1), which can result in multiple harvests[18].

    • In SSA, mungbean grain yields exceeding 1.5 Mg·ha−1 have been reported for improved varieties[37], while traditional varieties average about 0.5 Mg·ha−1[13,38]. Mungbean is classified by the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), as a 'dry bean'. Few studies have been conducted to assess the adaptation, growth, and yield of introduced mungbean genotypes in Africa, but no prior article has reviewed the potential of mungbean in Sub-Saharan Africa to our knowledge.

      While production of major legume crops such as groundnut, cowpea, and common beans has seen an important increase in Sub-Saharan Africa in the last 20 years (Fig. 2), mungbean production has remained low and stable[17]. One of the reasons behind this phenomenon could be explained by the low adoption of superior mungbean lines by farmers in SSA. In major mungbean-producing countries in this region, recently reported average yields fluctuated between 0.2 to 0.5 Mg·ha−1[39] while potential yields of 2.0 Mg·ha−1 have been reported in trials[40]. Although the use of improved mungbean lines developed by the World Vegetable Centre have shown promising results in Asia, African farmers still use traditional varieties that are low yielding, small-seeded, susceptible to pests and diseases, and pod-shattering[39]. A participatory selection study of mungbean genotypes conducted in Uganda has revealed farmers' preferences for high-yielding and large-seeded genotypes compared to landraces[37]. These findings suggest that breeding efforts to enhance mungbean productivity need to focus on farmers' needs.

      Figure 2. 

      Annual production of major pulse crops in Sub-Saharan Africa during the period between 2012 and 2022 (M Mg). Source: FAOSTAT[41].

    • Mungbean is usually grown on marginal lands under rainfed conditions. It is well adapted to arid and semiarid conditions and is suitable for planting at a range of altitudes, temperatures, and soil types. However, it grows best in subtropical regions with average annual rainfall in the range of 600−900 mm and at altitudes not exceeding 2,000 m on well-drained loams or sandy loam soils[13]. Mungbean is well-suited to many cropping systems due to its ability to improve soil fertility and sustain productivity of subsequent crops in subsistence agriculture. Multiple factors contribute to mungbean's drought-tolerance such as rapid seedling growth rate (significantly positive correlation (p < 0.05) with drought-tolerance, deep root system with extensive proliferation, and efficient stomatal conductance together with better photosynthetic capacity under water stress[42]. Despite being drought-tolerant, prolonged drought can lead to reduced pod formation, grain yield, and higher abortion rates. Mungbean also has a lower abortion of flowers or pods (14%−37%) compared to 43%−81%, 48%−76%, and 70%−88% in soybean, common bean, and cowpea, respectively. Addressing these challenges through mungbean varieties can improve drought tolerance and productivity, making mungbean a valuable crop for sustainable agricultural systems in SSA.

      Mungbean is an environmentally sustainable food legume, maintaining or enhancing soil fertility and reducing inorganic nitrogen needs. However, with the prevalence of poor soils in SSA, application of fertilizers could help in improving mungbean growth and yield under low soil fertility conditions. Diatta et al.[43] found that utilizing organic amendments could serve as a viable substitute for expensive and inaccessible inorganic fertilizers to enhance mungbean output in low-input agricultural systems. Like other legume crops, seed inoculation of mungbean with an appropriate stain of Rhizobium ssp. can result in a 10%−12% increase in productivity[18]. In addition, soils in SSA are characterized by low content of essential nutrients, particularly phosphorus, which is crucial for crop growth. Phosphorus deficiency affects root development, seed formation, and yields, which directly affect crop yields. For mungbean, adequate phosphorus availability is vital for root proliferation, nodulation, and effective nitrogen fixation, all of which enhance its productivity. The inoculation of mungbean with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi has been shown to improve its adaptation to low-phosphorus environments, enhancing the absorption of phosphorus from the soil[44]. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can improve the uptake of slow diffusing soil nutrients like phosphorus and micronutrients such as zinc. This symbiotic relationship between mungbean, Rhizobium ssp. and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi can promote and sustain mungbean productivity, even under drought conditions.

      Additionally, the ability of mungbean to fix atmospheric nitrogen (Table 1) and its adaptability to diverse climatic conditions make it an optimal crop for integration into rotational cropping systems in SSA. Mungbean, when intercropped with cereals such as maize, millet, or rice, improves soil fertility by increasing soil nitrogen levels, which could benefit to succeeding crops and diminishing the need for synthetic fertilizers. Zang et al.[45] noted that 10% of fixed nitrogen can be transferred to companion and subsequent crops, while the larger percentage remained in the soil. This finding suggests that mungbean rhizodeposition may enhance nitrogen availability in the soil for following crops. Thomas et al.[46] indicated that crop rotation, incorporating legumes such as mungbean, enhances the profitability and sustainability of crop production in contrast to continuous winter cereal cropping by optimizing water utilization, nitrogen efficiency, and market prices, while mitigating detrimental impacts of plant diseases. In addition, mungbean can be also sown post-harvest of a grain crop, utilizing remaining soil moisture for rapid growth and nutritional replenishment. The integration of short-duration summer mungbean, with a growth period of 60 d, after harvesting potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Indo-Gangetic Plains of India resulted in nitrogen addition and economic returns[47].

      Intercropping systems are common agronomic techniques extensively practiced by subsistence farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa. Intercropping cereals with legume crops such as mungbean could increase the productivity of the land and minimize the risk of crop failure[48]. In Senegal, Trail et al.[49] intercropped pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.] with mungbean (1:1 row ratio; 1 m × 1 m for millet and 1 m × 0.5 m for mungbean) and noted a 36% increase in millet grain yield compared to monocropped millet spaced 1 m × 1 m for a planting density of 10,000 hill per hectare. Naresh et al.[50] reported that a 1:1 row ratio of pearl millet and mungbean produced the maximum millet grain yield of 1,086 kg·ha−1 among all intercropping treatments. Ghilotia et al.[51], however, found that millet yielded more (1,568.40 kg·ha−1) when grown alone compared to intercropping with mungbean. Shaker-Koohi et al.[52] intercropped mungbean with sorghum in a field experiment conducted in Iran and reported that intercropping treatments had higher intercropping advantage (3.22), relative yield totals (1.36) and land equivalent ratio (> 1) compared to monocropping.

      From an environmental standpoint, mungbean can improve crop yields and water use efficiency in Sub-Saharan Africa through reduction of soil surface temperature and water evaporation and addition of nutrients and organic matter to soil when grown as green manure and/or cover crops. Among others, characteristics such as early establishment, high seedling vigor, and N2 fixation efficiency, short growing season with significant biomass production, favorable nitrogen to carbon balance, and easy incorporation and quick degradation into the soil, make mungbean a suitable crop for soil improvement in Sub-Saharan Africa. Using mungbean as cover crop in semi-arid watersheds has resulted in reduced soil erosion through a decrease in runoff (28%) and sediment (30%) losses compared to bare soil[53]. Using mungbean as a cover crop may also reduce weed infestation of the companion crop[54]. Weed density and fresh weed biomass were 34% and 54% lower, respectively, under maize-millet intercropping (6:10 row ratio) compared to maize monocropping in Pakistan[55].

      Moreover, mungbean has been used as an environmentally sound and sustainable approach for managing insects in cropping systems. A study conducted by Lu et al.[56] to assess the potential of mungbean as a trap crop revealed a 50% decrease in mirid bug [Apolygus lucorum (Meyer-Dür) (Heteroptera: Miridae)] population densities compared to cotton fields without mungbean plants (36 individuals per 100 plants). Similar findings were also reported by Geng et al.[57] who observed not only significantly higher number of adults and first instar nymphs of A. lucorum but also longer adult longevity and fecundity on mungbean compared to cotton plants (p < 0.05). To understand the migration of A. lucorum adults between neighboring cotton and mungbean fields, Wang et al.[58] developed a DNA-based polymerase chain reaction (PCR) approach. Findings from this study revealed a detection of cotton DNA in the guts of A. lucorum collected from mungbean plots evidencing the migration A. lucorum from cotton to mungbean plots. Results from these studies could help in developing mungbean-based trap-cropping strategies for controlling A. lucorum on agricultural crops.

      Mungbean is also highly efficient in the use of nutrients, especially nitrogen, allowing smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa to achieve acceptable grain yields on marginal lands and under low fertility management. While mungbean crops have been successfully grown in SSA under low-technology schemes to date, ensuring a timely and efficient nitrogen availability to the crop will represent a key management decision to increase grain yields in a region where little to nothing can be done regarding water availability to the crop.

    • The high nutritional value of mungbean makes it a good source of protein, minerals, and vitamins to smallholder households. Mungbean has a high protein content, complementing to deficiencies of cereal-based diets in SSA[17]. Mung bean is an important source of protein in South and Southeast Asian countries where it is usually known as the 'poor man's meat'. Studies determining the proximate composition of mungbean report a wide variation in protein values (15% to 33%)[59,60]. Mungbean has a comparable protein content to chickpea, kidney bean, cowpea, groundnut, and pigeon pea (Table 2)[61]. Mungbean is also a rich source of amino acids like arginine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, phenylalanine, valine, aspartic acid, glutamic acid, and serine (Table 3)[60]. The relatively high protein and lysine content, added to the low content of methionine in mungbean makes it a good complement for cereals with high carbohydrate, low lysine, and high methionine concentrations[62]. Although mungbean is an important source of protein, its protein nutritional quality is limited by low concentrations of sulfur-containing amino acids such as methionine and cysteine with 0.29 g and 0.21g in 100 g of a raw edible portion[38].

      Table 2.  Absolute nutritional content (in g or mg) of major crop legumes grown in Africa and Asia*.

      Crop Protein (g) Oil (g) Calcium (mg) Iron (mg) Zinc (mg) Vitamin A (mcg-RAE) Vitamin
      C
      (mg)
      Folate (mcg)
      Mungbean 26 1 145 7 3 7 5 687
      Mungbean sprout 32 2 135 9 4 10 138 635
      Chickpea 22 7 119 7 4 3 5 630
      Cowpea 27 2 96 11 7 2 2 718
      Groundnut 28 53 98 5 3 0 0 257
      Kidney bean 27 1 162 9 3 0 5 446
      Pigeon pea 21 5 123 5 3 9 114 507
      Soybean 40 22 303 17 5 1 7 410
      Soybean, green 40 21 606 11 3 28 89 508
      * Value per 100 g raw product (dry weight basis). Source: (USDA, 2010).

      Table 3.  Amino acid composition of mung bean.

      Amino acid (g/16 g of nitrogen)Average*MinimumMaximum
      Alanine4.13.64.5
      Arginine5.84.56.7
      Aspartic acid131215.1
      Cysteic acid13.513.513.5
      Glutamic acid18.313.621.7
      Glycine3.63.24.3
      Histidine3.22.45.6
      Isoleucine4.33.65.4
      Leucine7.66.98.7
      Lysine6.54.18.1
      Methionine1.20.51.9
      Phenylalanine5.44.66.2
      Proline4.53.75.6
      Serine4.945.8
      Threonine3.22.74
      Tryptophan1.20.53.4
      Tyrosine2.72.23.3
      Valine5.14.16.4
      * Mean value of all collected data[60].

      Anti-nutritional compounds reduce the nutritive value of food due to limited digestibility, bioavailability, and bioconversion of nutrients. Anti-nutritional compounds reported in mungbean include tannins, phytic acid, hemagglutinins, polyphenols, trypsin inhibitors, and proteinase inhibitors[60]. However, the reported amount of anti-nutritional components in mungbean like trypsin, hemagglutination, saponins, pythic acid, and insoluble dietary fiber, have been relatively lower compared to other legume crops such as soybean and cowpea[63]. Variation in the amounts of anti-nutritional components in mungbean can likely be explained by differences in genetic variation among cultivars[64]. Processing techniques to decrease the concentration of anti-nutritional factors in mungbean include breeding research, agronomic techniques, and food preparation processes such as sprouting, dehulling, soaking, germination, boiling, and cooking[59]. Preparing mungbean seeds with vegetables has been shown to lower the concentrations of anti-nutritional factors such as trypsin, hemagglutination activity, saponin, phytic acid, and insoluble fiber[65]. Split seeds consumed with rice are beneficial for children and elderly people.

      Additionally, mungbean seeds are an important source of carbohydrates (59%−65%), minerals (particularly iron), vitamins, and amino acids in human diets[60] (Table 2). Minerals present in mungbean seeds include iron, calcium, phosphorous, magnesium, and potassium[66]. Mungbean seeds contain 1%−1.5% fat, 3.5%−4.5% fiber, and 4.5%−5.5% ash[67]. Adding to its highly desirable nutritive composition, mungbean is also considered valuable for good health and human development because of the high digestibility of its protein and carbohydrates[68]. The digestibility value of mungbean (67%−72%) is comparable to chickpea (65%−79%), pigeon pea (60%−74%), soybean (63%−72%), and urd bean (56%−63%)[69].

    • Mungbean is an important food and livestock feed legume crop in tropical and subtropical regions and is extensively consumed for its protein-rich grains (Table 4)[70]. Mungbean grains are typically consumed as boiled or cooked with vegetables or meat[17]. It can also be used to make sprouts, soups, noodles, desserts, and several other food products[71]. In East Africa, mungbean is commonly consumed as a vegetable and processed seed. In Kenya and Tanzania, mungbean green pods and immature seeds are consumed with a popular thick maize porridge called ugali[67]. Mature seeds of mungbean are also commonly boiled together with maize, sorghum, and other cereals or fried with meat or vegetables in Kenya[67]. In Uganda, mungbean represents an important food product and source of income for smallholder farmers[39]. Consumption of cooked mungbean seeds in sauces and as a side dish is common in Ethiopia and Malawi, respectively[13]. In West Africa, on the other side, recent efforts to improve food security and soil fertility through crop diversification have resulted in the introduction and development of mungbean[72]. In Nigeria, mungbean is consumed as sprouts in salad or processed into biscuits[73]. Mungbean seeds and leaves are boiled and consumed with rice or millet in Senegal[74]. A study on dietary diversity of women and children conducted in Senegal revealed that the inclusion of mungbean into the Senegalese diet could be a major addition to the limited legume crops and supplement to cereal-based diets[75].

      Table 4.  Food, feed, and non-food uses of mungbean.

      Category Uses Description
      Food Whole seeds Mungbean seeds are commonly boiled and consumed as a side dish or with cereals such as rice or millet.
      Split seeds (Dhal) In South Asia, mungbean seeds are split to make dhal, a thick soup served with rice or bread.
      Sprouts Mungbean seeds are sprouted and eaten in salads, sandwiches, or stir-fried dishes, rich in vitamins and minerals.
      Noodles and soups Mungbean flour is used to make glass noodles and soups in Asian cuisines, particularly in China and Southeast Asia.
      Desserts and sweets Mungbean is used in making traditional sweets like cakes and jellies, especially in Asian countries.
      Flour Mungbean seeds are ground into flour, used in baking, or mixed with wheat flour to increase the protein content of baked products.
      Baby food supplements Mungbean flour, rich in protein and iron, is used as a supplement in baby food products to improve nutritional quality.
      Fermented foods Mungbean is used in the fermentation process to create food products like tempeh, which are rich in probiotics and proteins.
      Feed Livestock fodder Mungbean residues (leaves and stems) are fed to livestock, providing a high-protein feed that supports meat and milk production.
      Green manure Mungbean is grown as a cover crop, and its biomass is incorporated into the soil as green manure, enriching the soil with organic matter and nutrients.
      Non-food Trap crop for pest management Mungbean is used as a trap crop in integrated pest management systems to reduce pest populations on cash crops like cotton.
      Soil improvement
      (nitrogen fixation)
      As a legume, mungbean fixes atmospheric nitrogen, enhancing soil fertility for subsequent crops in crop rotation systems.
      Erosion control When used as a cover crop, mungbean helps reduce soil erosion by stabilizing the soil surface and reducing water runoff.
      Industrial applications
      (starch production)
      Mungbean starch is extracted and used in the production of biodegradable plastics, cosmetics, and other industrial applications.

      In India, mungbean is consumed as whole or split seeds which are transformed into a thick soup called 'dhal'[76]. In China, food products made of mungbean include soup, porridge of mungbean and rice, sprouts, starch noodles, and cakes, while cold jellies and cakes represent the popular food products in Thailand[67]. After removing the seed coat, mungbean seeds may also be ground into flour. Mungbean flour can be further transformed into various products such as noodles, bread, biscuits, and vegetable cheese, used to fortify wheat flour, or to formulate high-protein food supplements for children (Table 4)[67]. Imtiaz et al.[77] revealed that 44% wheat flour with 36% mungbean flour or 56% wheat flour with 24% mungbean flour combined with 10% skim milk powder and 10% sugar in both cases can be used as weaning food. However, work on the effects of processing methods on protein concentration has shown that processing could improve the nutrient composition of mungbean flours[78].

      Mungbean may provide opportunities for improving the health of rural populations in Sub Saharan Africa (Table 4). The relatively high concentration of proteins, amino acids, oligosaccharides, and polyphenols in mungbean make it suitable for antioxidant, antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and anti-tumor use[79]. Mungbean soup has been successfully used to increase total antioxidant capacity and glutathione levels and to subsequently alleviate heat stress in rats[80]. Results from this study demonstrate the potential of mungbean soup in reducing the risk of heat stress in humans.

      Mungbean crop residues are a good quality forage for livestock, particularly as a high-protein supplement to produce high-quality meat and milk (Table 4). Sherasia et al.[81] reported that fresh forage mungbean contains 13%−21% of protein on a dry matter basis and mungbean straw has 9%−12% protein content. Forage yields of non-fertilized mungbean plants averaged 0.64 t·ha−1 while 1.4 t·ha−1 was recorded under fertilized conditions[81]. However, aboveground samples of mungbean for forage yielded 2.9 t·ha−1 in central Oklahoma, USA[82]. Because mungbean matures quickly, it offers forage while other legume crops such as cowpea or velvet bean are still maturing[83].

    • The productivity of mungbean, widely grown over a range of environments is constrained by abiotic and biotic stresses[1]. Among abiotic stresses, drought and flooding are two of the major constraints to mungbean production in SSA. High rainfall variability has led to a reduction in suitable lands for bean production and a subsequent decrease in agricultural production[14]. Drought and flooding stresses have been reported to limit growth and yield of mungbean[84]. To understand the effects of water stress on phenological and agronomic traits of mungbean, Lalinia et al.[85] applied four irrigation regimes (no water stress, drought stress at the flowering, during pod and seed formation) to five mungbean cultivars in Iran. They found that drought stress manifested in mungbean through decreased plant height, 100-grain weight, number of grains per pod, number of pods per plant, days to flowering, and physiological maturity. This decrease in mungbean growth and yield components when grown under drought stress conditions could be explained by inefficient stomatal regulation and low photosynthetic capacity under limited soil moisture stress conditions[7]. An excess of water can be detrimental to mungbean productivity. Working with five mungbean genotypes in Bangladesh, Amin et al.[84] found that a 4-d flooding imposed at 24 d after emergence induced a decrease in total dry matter and seed yield through a reduction in the pods per plant and the seed size of all genotypes. The decrease in mungbean productivity could be explained by the reduction in leaf photosynthesis, stomatal closure, and growth inhibition[42].

      Fewer pest and disease problems have been reported in mungbean compared to other legumes such as soybean, common bean, and cowpea resulting in more stable yields[17]. Yield loss of mungbean can be caused by field pests such as whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Genn), leaf hopper, Empoasca kerri (Pruthi), black aphid, Aphis craccivora (Koch), Bihar hairy caterpillar, Diacrisia obliqua (Wlk.), galerucid beetle, Madurasia obscurella (Jacoby), stem fly, Ophiomyia (Melanagromyza) phaseoli (Tryon), lycaenid borer, Euchrysops cnezus (Fabr), and spotted caterpillar, Maruca testulalis (Geyer)[86]. Integrated management strategies of mungbean pests include resistant cultivars, clean seeds, cultural practices, and biological and chemical control approaches[87]. The major viral disease that constrains mungbean production is Mungbean Yellow Mosaic Virus (MYMV)[8890]. MYMV, favored by maximum temperature and humidity[91] and whitefly population[92], is caused by Begomovirus species transmitted by whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Gennadius)[93]. However, the incidence of MYMV in mungbean has not been reported in SSA.

      Additional major diseases of mungbean reported in major producing regions include powdery mildew [Podosphaera fusca (Fr.) U. Braun & Shishkoff], anthracnose [Colletotrichum acutatum (J.H. Simmonds)], cercospora leaf spots [Cercospora canescens Ellis & G. Martin], Erysiphe polygoni (Vaňha) Weltzien), C. truncatum (Schwein.) Andrus & Moore, C. gloeosporioides (Penz.) Penz. & Sacc), and wet root rot [Rhizoctonia solani (Kuhn)][8890]. Options to reduce the impacts of mungbean pathogens involve integrated disease management such as combinations of insecticides, fungicides, and bio-formulation as a seed treatment. Dubey & Birendra[88] revealed that mungbean seeds treated with a combination of thiamethoxam (insecticide) at 4 g·kg−1, carboxin (fungicide) at 2 g·kg−1 and Pusa 5SD (Trichoderma virens) at 4 g·kg−1 recorded a low incidence of Cercospora leaf spots, MYMV, and wet root rot. Although these diseases have not been reported as major threat to mungbean in SSA, expansion of mungbean beyond Asia will need the development of high-yielding and disease-resistant mungbean varieties.

      Lack of policy and research attention can also constrain the productivity of mungbean in Sub Saharan Africa[94]. Increases in mungbean productivity is often limited by an insufficient supply of suitable cultivars and high-quality seeds coupled with the lack of training programs on mungbean potential benefits for agricultural productivity, soil, and human health[14,17]. As a result, adaptive and strategic research associated with the development of a strong network and financial support will be helpful to promote mungbean from being a marginal crop to become one of the major grain legume crops in SSA, as was the case in Asia[38].

    • For increased mungbean adoption in Sub-Saharan Africa, agronomic practices for improving mungbean yields could be optimization of row spacing and plant density to increase mungbean production through increased cumulative intercepted radiation and increased water use efficiency for specific environments. Diatta et al.[18] reported that inoculation of mungbean with Bradyrhizobium inoculum (group I) increased the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per plant, and seed yield by 15%, 18%, and 14%, respectively over uninoculated mungbean. HanumanthaRao et al.[1] & Trail et al.[49] suggested that surface organic mulch could also be used to alleviate heat stress of mungbean under semi-arid conditions through a decrease in soil temperature and reduced loss of soil water.

      Promotion and utilization of mungbean in agriculture in Sub-Saharan Africa will require enhancement of production and nutritional value through breeding and better management practices under environmental and economic constraints[1,60]. To fully utilize mungbean to increase agricultural resiliency in SSA, the changing climatic conditions will need concomitant screening of existing varieties and genetic improvements to develop high-yielding varieties with short growing season, disease-resistant, and tolerant to waterlogging and salinity[7]. In this regard, efforts to develop improved varieties of mungbean with synchronous maturity, short growing season (60−75 d), higher yields (> 2 Mg·ha−1), and better nutritional composition were recently initiated in South Asia[15]. Despite these efforts, limited data on the genome sequence for Vigna species in developing countries resulted in limited advancement of molecular breeding research in these regions, particularly in SSA[6]. Participatory selection of high yielding and nutrient-dense cultivars should be continued in Eastern Africa but also encouraged in other Sub-Saharan regions[37].

      Because of the genetic variability of mineral composition in mungbean varieties, biofortification has a great potential for enhancing micronutrient concentrations, and thus its nutritional quality[15,60]. For example, interspecific breeding of mungbean with black gram [V. mungo (L.) Hepper], a close relative of mungbean could be used to increase the low concentration of the essential amino acid methionine[67]. The establishment of seed production and distribution systems and creation of agronomic and market opportunities will be necessary for smallholder farmers[17]. The development of training programs in mungbean production such as the organization of field days and demonstration trials need to be promoted to sustain food production in SSA[17]. These training programs should also take into account the diversity of agro-ecological conditions and socio-economic factors in SSA[48]. Finally, expansion of mungbean in SSA may also require adequate financial support from national research institutes, international organizations, and the private sector to sustain and capitalize research findings on best agronomic practices, breeding efforts, and adaptation strategies of mungbean to current agriculture systems in SSA.

    • The projected increase in climate variability, as well as increased frequency and intensity of extreme weather events is expected to have a negative impact on agricultural production worldwide. Rainfall variability and persistent droughts and floods are reported to contribute to decreased crop yields[95], fluctuation and volatility of food prices[96], negative impacts on livelihoods[10], and increased poverty and malnutrition[97]. Development of adaptation strategies and mitigation efforts that would anticipate effective responses and interventions will be important in Sub-Saharan Africa where the most vulnerable populations are located[11]. Such strategies include improvement of agricultural management practices[98] and sustainable intensification[99], use of high-yielding and drought and heat-resistant crop genotypes[100], intensified use of technology inputs[101], natural resource stewardship[102], and development of policy and community programs[10].

    • This paper highlights the promising yet largely unexploited potential of mungbean for diversifying and increasing crop productivity, promoting sustainable adaptation strategies, and reducing food insecurity and poverty in Sub-Saharan Africa. Mungbean's N fixation potential, agronomic advantages, and nutritional potential makes it a valuable crop for meeting the ever-increasing global need for food and nutritional security. Broad production and consumption of mungbean in SSA should be encouraged by the active promotion of both good agronomic practices and information about the nutritional value of mungbean for human health.

      Nutritional and agronomic benefits should be also given research and development attention supported by a multidisciplinary approach. Existing germplasms need to be extensively screened to find the best varieties for varied environments in SSA and acceptability for local cuisine. In this regard, 550 mungbean varieties from USDA and AVRDC are being screened for the best agronomic and nutritional traits in Senegal. In addition, variety screening is relatively inexpensive and provides immediate resources for growers, thereby promoting adoption.

      Upon identifying the suite of biotic and abiotic constraints, it will be important to set priorities for breeding programs' focusing on incorporating disease resistance into the varieties identified as best adapted to the physical environment. Thus, innovative mungbean breeding and agronomic technologies can be utilized to develop new varieties with superior agronomic, adaptive, and nutritional traits suitable for current cropping systems in SSA. Increased production and adoption of mungbean can support sustainable production and improve the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in SSA.

      • The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Diatta AA, Abaye O, Thomason WE; data collection: Diatta AA, Battaglia ML, Leme JFDC; analysis and interpretation of results: Diatta AA; Battaglia ML, Seleiman M, Babur E; draft manuscript preparation: Diatta AA, Abaye O, Wade ET. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

      • The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

      • The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions of the School of Plant and Environmental Sciences (SPES) and the Center for International Research, Education, and Development (CIRED) of Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University (Virginia Tech). Staff and management members in the Centre National de Recherches Agronomiques de Bambey are also gratefully acknowledged. The authors would also like to thank anonymous reviewers for their thoughtful suggestions that have considerably helped improve the manuscript.

      • The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

      • Copyright: © 2024 by the author(s). Published by Maximum Academic Press, Fayetteville, GA. This article is an open access article distributed under Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
    Figure (2)  Table (4) References (102)
  • About this article
    Cite this article
    Diatta AA, Abaye O, Battaglia ML, Leme JFDC, Seleiman M, et al. 2024. Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and its potential for crop diversification and sustainable food production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Technology in Agronomy 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/tia-0024-0030
    Diatta AA, Abaye O, Battaglia ML, Leme JFDC, Seleiman M, et al. 2024. Mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] and its potential for crop diversification and sustainable food production in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review. Technology in Agronomy 4: e031 doi: 10.48130/tia-0024-0030

Catalog

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return