-
This experiment was conducted in the winter or rabi crop season from November 15 2020, to February 14 2021, at the Botanical Pesticides Research Field of the Institute of Environmental Science, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. The experimental area was located at 24.37°N latitude and 88.7°E longitude at an altitude of 21 m above sea level. The experiment was laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications and 12 treatments. There were eight cabbage plants in each replicate. The plot size was 1.2 m × 1.8 m, the distance between blocks was 0.75 m, and the distance between plots was 0.5 m. To prepare the field for transplanting, the plot was plowed five times which was followed by laddering. Crop stubble and weeds were removed from the field, and land was leveled before planting cabbage seedlings. To support plant growth, manures, and fertilizers were applied to the experimental plots at the doses recommended by the Soil Resources Development Institute (SRDI), Bangladesh. Then, 15-day-old cabbage seedlings (variety: Sakata F1 Hybrid Atlas 70) were transplanted in the experimental plot.
Collection of plant materials and preparation of extracts
-
Seeds of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.), leaves of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Molina Standl.), and fruit peel of lemon (Citrus limon L. Osbeck) were collected from the campus of University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh, as plant materials with potential biopesticide properties.
The samples were first visually examined for any kind of infection, spores, damage, discoloration, and distortion. Undamaged fresh samples were thoroughly washed with running tap water. For the preparation of 40% w/v plant extracts, 400 g ground jute seed, 400 g chopped bottle gourd leaves, and 400 g chopped lemon peel were added separately to 1,000 mL distilled water and boiled for 30 min. The solutions were cooled and filtered through a muslin cloth. Different concentrations (5%, 10%, 20%, and 30%) of the extracts were prepared by dilution with water. The diluted extracts were kept in plastic bottles at room temperature until use.
The positive control, Malathion (57 EC formulation), was applied at a rate of 75 mL per 3.785 L (1 gallon) of water. This trial included a control (water only) and a chemical insecticide treatment, Malathion (57 EC), as the positive control.
Aphid monitoring and spraying of plant extracts
-
Aphid infestation was monitored in the experimental cabbage field under open field conditions. The number of aphids on both sides of the leaves was counted visually in the field in the morning. Prepared plant extracts were sprayed in the field with a home garden hand sprayer (1 L) onto cabbage plants twice a week at 3-day intervals in the morning (9 am). The spray treatments were started at 15 d after transplanting (DAT) of cabbage seedlings and continued until the end of the growing season (53 DAT). During this growing period, cabbage plants were sprayed with plant extracts 10 times in total.
Sampling and analytical methods
-
The aphid population was monitored from the start of aphid colonization until the cabbage plants reached maturity. Aphids were visually counted on the leaves of each plant in each treatment. First, three outer leaves of cabbage were collected and the number of aphids visible to the naked eye was counted on both the upper and lower side of the leaves. The average count from three leaves was considered as the aphid population per plant. The number of aphids was counted using the per-leaf sampling system[24]. Then, the average population per leaf was calculated. The average life cycle of an aphid is 30 d, so aphid infestation data were collected on 45 DAT and 60 DAT. Plant growth was measured in the field on February 14 2021, and yield data were collected after harvesting. The total cabbage yield (kg/plot) was recorded and the percentage yield increase over that of the water control was calculated as follows[25]:
$ \rm Yield\;increase\;({\text{%}})=\dfrac{Treatment\;yield-Control\;yield}{Control\;yield}\times 100 $ The abundance of aphids (%) over that in the positive control group (treated with Malathion 57 EC) was calculated as follows:
$ \rm Aphid\;abundance\;({\text{%}})= \rm\dfrac{Number\;of\;aphids\;in\;treatment\;group - Number\;of\;aphids\;in\;Malathion\;57\;EC\;treatment\;group}{Number\;of\;aphids\;in\;Malathion\;57\;EC\;treatment\;group}\times 100 $ Preparation of plant extracts for phytochemical and gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis
-
Each plant part (seed, leaves, fruit peel) was washed with tap water and then left to dry in the light at room temperature (37 °C). The dried plant parts were ground using a DFT-100 plant grinding machine (Linda Machinery Co. Ltd., Wenling, China). About 100 g of ground powder was placed in a conical flask and 400 mL methanol was added. The mixture was incubated at room temperature with shaking at 110 rpm (MON1063 Rotary Shaker, Mainland, China) for 24 h, then centrifuged for 20 min at 2,075 ×g (LaboGene 406, LaboGene, Hillerød, Denmark). The supernatant was filtered through Whatman no. 1 filter paper, then concentrated by removing methanol with a rotary evaporator at 48 °C. The concentrated sample was stored at 4 °C until further analysis.
Phytochemical screening
-
Phyto-chemical analysis was done only potent plant extract following the standard proceudres described previously[26−28].
Sample preparation for GC−MS analysis
-
A 20 mg portion of potent plant extract was added to a 50 mL Falcon tube. Then, methanol (Sigma-Aldrich GC Grade) was added to the tube until the sample became colorless. The upper layer 2 mL was collected for gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis.
GC−MS analysis
-
The plant extract was analyzed using a Shimadzu QP-2020 GC−MS (Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan) instrument equipped with an SH-Rxi-5Sil MS column (length, 30 m; 0.25 mm in diameter; film thickness, 0.25 μm), an auto-sampler (AOC-20s), and an auto-injector (AOC-20i). The temperature program was as follows: initial oven temperature 80 °C (hold time 2 min), increased at 50 °C/min to 150 °C (hold time 5 min), and then increased to a final temperature of 280 °C. The carrier gas was helium (99.99%) at a flow pressure of 1.72 mL/min (hold time 8 min). The injection volume was 6.0 μL at a 20:1 split ratio (split injection mode), the injector temperature was 230 °C, and the ion source temperature was 280 °C. The electron ionization energy was set to 70 eV. Mass spectra in the range of 45 m/z to 350 m/z were captured for 50 min. The total run time was 50 min, with a solvent cut time of 3.2 min. The components were identified by comparing their mass spectra with those in the NIST08s, NIST08, and NIST14 libraries.
Data analysis
-
The biopesticide activities of different plant extracts against aphids on field-grown cabbage plants were tested in an experimental plot using a randomized complete block design. The data were entered into Excel (Microsoft) and subjected to one-way ANOVA. Significant differences among treatments were detected using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05) with SPSS v. 20 software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA)[29].
-
Among the 12 treatments, the bottle gourd leaf extracts at 10% and 20% significantly (p < 0.05) decreased the number of aphids. The lowest aphid population was on cabbage plants treated with the 10% bottle gourd leaf extract, and the highest was in those treated with the 10% jute seed extract and the control at both 45 DAT and 60 DAT (Figs 1 & 2).
Figure 1.
Effect of plant extracts on the number of aphids/leaf on field grown cabbage at 45 DAT. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at p < 0.05; DAT= Days after transplanting; EC= Emulsifiable concentrate.
Figure 2.
Effect of plant extracts on the number of aphids/leaf on field grown cabbage at 60 DAT. Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at p < 0.05; DAT= Days after transplanting; EC= Emulsifiable concentrate.
Effects of plant extracts on number of leaves, plant spread, head diameter, and head weight per plant
-
Table 1 shows the number of leaves per plant, plant spread, head diameter, and head weight per plant of cabbage in the treatment groups, control group, and positive control group. The number of leaves per plant was highest in the 30% bottle gourd leaf extract group and lowest in the 5% jute seed extract group. The number of leaves per plant in the 30% bottle gourd leaf extract group was 1.38 times that in the control. Among all the treatment groups, the 30% bottle gourd leaf extract group showed the best performance in terms of plant spread, head diameter, and head weight.
Table 1. Effects of plant extracts on number of leaves per plant, plant spread, head diameter, and head weight/plant of field-grown cabbage.
Treatment Number of leaves per plant Plant spread (cm) Head diameter (cm) Head weight (kg)/plant Control 22.12 ± 1.58de 32.75 ± 4.07fg 10.81 ± 0.31ab 2.17 ± 0.28de Jute seed (5%) 12.91 ± 0.66f 20.73 ± 1.20h 7.20 ± 0.50ab 1.26 ± 3.40f Jute seed (10%) 21.76 ± 8.09ef 32.21 ± 2.41fg 10.74 ± 0.51ab 2.56 ± 1.01cd Jute seed (20%) 23.95 ± 4.72bc 35.46 ± 2.53ef 12.31 ± 0.92bc 2.66 ± 0.68bc Bottle gourd leaves (10%) 23.44 ± 1.71ef 34.69 ± 4.31ef 11.45 ± 0.01a 2.47 ± 0.27cd Bottle gourd leaves (20%) 24.80 ± 5.64de 36.69 ± 9.11de 12.80 ± 0.82bc 2.45 ± 0.50cd Bottle gourd leaves (30%) 30.58 ± 0.53a 45.80 ± 1.45a 15.11 ± 0.9bc 3.30 ± 0.72a Bottle gourd leaves (40%) 27.37 ± 9.90de 40.52 ± 3.21bc 13.37 ± 0.82bc 2.80 ± 4.41fg Lemon peel (10%) 29.57 ± 7.26bc 40.82 ± 6.14bc 14.44 ± 0.81bc 3.15 ± 0.55ab Lemon peel (20%) 27.43 ± 0.38ab 43.77 ± 3.18ab 13.56 ± 0.46ab 3.12 ± 1.47ab Lemon peel (30%) 21.49 ± 2.70cd 31.80 ± 2.23g 11.04 ± 0.18a 2.12 ± 0.52a Lemon peel (40%) 28.11 ± 0.61ab 41.60 ± 3.10ab 13.82 ± 0.54ab 2.84 ± 0.50ab Malathion 57 EC 25.96 ± 1.92ab 38.42 ± 4.61cd 12.67 ± 0.90bc 2.52 ± 0.62bc p value <0.0001** <0.0001** <0.0001** <0.0001** F value 17.664 46.541 8.644 4.892 DF 12 12 12 12 Different letters within the same column indicate significant difference at p < 0.05; ** significance at p ≤ 0.01; DAT= Days After Transplanting; EC = Emulsifiable Concentrate. Effect of plant extracts on the abundance of aphids/plant and abundance of aphids (%) over that in the Malathion 57 EC group
-
The results showed that, compared with the application of Malathion, the application of 10% bottle gourd leaf extract significantly decreased aphid infestation on cabbage by 73.91% and 79.36% at 45 DAT and 60 DAT, respectively. Aphid infestation on cabbage was notably reduced by using 20% bottle gourd leaf extract at 45 and 60 DAT, by 67.93% and 50.79%, respectively. Similarly, compared with the application of Malathion, the application of 30% bottle gourd leaf extract considerably reduced the aphid infestation by 28.26% at 45 DAT and by 46.83% at 60 DAT (Table 2).
Table 2. Abundance of aphids in treatment groups, control group, and Malathion 57 EC group, and abundance of aphids (%) over that in the Malathion 57 EC group.
Treatment Aphid abundance (number/plant) Abundance (%) over Malathion 57 EC 45 DAT 60 DAT 45 DAT 60 DAT Control 198.99 ± 7.54a 156.99 ± 2.40a +8.15 +24.60 Jute seed (5%) 174.00 ± 8.19a 140.01 ± 8.84ab −5.43 +11.12 Jute seed (10%) 192.00 ± 9.07a 167.01 ± 6.36a +4.35 +32.55 Jute seed (20%) 108.00 ± 7.94ab 81.99 ± 4.81bcdef −41.30 −34.93 Bottle gourd leaves (10%) 48.00 ± 4.62b 26.01 ± 0.88f −73.91 −79.36 Bottle gourd leaves (20%) 59.01 ± 5.21b 62.01 ± 5.93ef −67.93 −50.79 Bottle gourd leaves (30%) 132.00 ± 21.66ab 66.99 ± 4.91def −28.26 −46.83 Bottle gourd leaves (40%) 105.00 ± 10.26ab 78.99 ± 9.02bcdef −42.93 −37.30 Lemon peel (10%) 135.99 ± 13.37ab 113.01 ± 9.68abcde −26.09 −10.31 Lemon peel (20%) 149.01 ± 17.82ab 119.01 ± 7.17abcde −19.01 −5.55 Lemon peel (30%) 143.01 ± 11.26ab 135.99 ± 7.26abc −22.27 +7.93 Lemon peel (40%) 152.01 ± 3.33ab 132.99 ± 3.84abc −17.38 +5.55 Malathion 57 EC 183.99 ± 6.64a 126.00 ± 5.20abcd − − p value <0.0001** <0.0001** − − F value 2.051 4.741 − − DF 12 12 − − Different letters within the same column indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05; ** significance at p ≤ 0.01; DAT = Days After Transplanting; EC = Emulsifiable Concentrate; Increased (+) aphid abundance compared with that in Malathion 57 EC group; Reduced aphid abundance (−) compared with that in Malathion 57 EC group. Effects of plant extracts on yield per plot and yield over that of the control and Malathion 57 EC groups
-
The cabbage yield was highest in the 30% bottle gourd leaf extract group (122.23 mt/ha), moderately high in the 10% and 20% lemon peel extract groups (116.68 and 115.57 mt/ha, respectively), and lowest (46.67 mt/ha) in the 5% jute seed extract group. The 30% bottle gourd leaf extract had the best effect on cabbage production, resulting in a 52.07% yield increase over that of the control group (Table 3).
Table 3. Effects of plant extracts on yield per plot and yield over that of the control and Malathion 57 EC groups.
Treatment Yield (kg/plot) Yield (mt/ha) Yield over control (%) Yield over Malathion 57 EC (%) Control 17.36 80.37 − −13.90 Jute seed (5%) 10.08 46.67 −42 −50 Jute seed (10%) 20.48 94.81 +17.97 +1.58 Jute seed (20%) 21.28 98.53 +22.58 +5.56 Bottle gourd leaves (10%) 19.76 91.49 +13.83 −1.98 Bottle gourd leaves (20%) 19.60 90.75 +12.90 −2.77 Bottle gourd leaves (30%) 26.40 122.23 +52.07 +30.95 Bottle gourd leaves (40%) 22.40 103.71 +29.03 +11.11 Lemon peel (10%) 25.20 116.68 +45.16 +25.01 Lemon peel (20%) 24.96 115.57 +43.78 +23.82 Lemon peel (30%) 16.96 78.53 −2.29 −15.87 Lemon peel (40%) 22.72 105.19 +30.88 +12.70 Malathion 57 EC 20.16 93.34 +16.13 − Increased (+) yield compared with control and Malathion 57 EC; Decreased (−) yield compared with control and Malathion 57 EC. Phytochemical screening
-
The phytochemical analysis revealed that the bottle gourd leaf extract was rich in alkaloids, flavonoids, terpenoids, phenols, and cardiac glycosides. No saponins, tannins, or anthraquinones were detected in the bottle gourd leaf extract.
Phytochemical components analysis by GC−MS
-
Investigations using GC−MS revealed that the methanolic extract of bottle gourd leaf comprises 13 prominent chemical components. There are higher amounts of phenol; 9,12-octadecadienoic acid; phytol and 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid compared to other components. From the literature survey, it is found that among these constituents 1,3,6,10-Dodecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (Z, E)-; hexadecenoic acid; phenol and phytol are highly significant in the management of aphids. Table 4 represents the basic information about the different components of bottle gourd leaf extract.
Table 4. Thirteen (methanol-soluble) compounds detected in bottle gourd leaf extract by GC−MS.
Name of the compounds Molecular formula Retention time Molecular weight (g/mol) % of composition 1,3,6,10-Dodecatetraene, 3,7,11-trimethyl-, (Z, E)- C15H24 14.369 93.00 2.557 Hexadecanal C16H32O 22.775 57.00 2.109 Dodecane, 1,1-dimethoxy- C14H30O2 26.991 75.00 6.363 Hexadecanoic acid, 15-methyl-, methyl ester C18H36O2 28.213 74.00 4.346 Cyclopropanepentanoic acid, 2-undecyl-, methyl ester, trans- C20H38O2 31.927 55.00 1.293 Phenol, 2-methoxy-4-(2-propenyl)-, acetate C12H14O3 12.329 164.00 16.666 Pentadecanoic acid, 14-methyl-, methyl ester C16H32O2 28.217 74.00 2.748 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, butyl 2-ethylhe C20H30O4 28.827 149.00 6.532 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid, methyl ester, (E, E)- C19H34O2 31.795 67.00 17.713 9-Octadecenoic acid (Z)-, methyl ester C19H36O2 31.950 55.00 4.697 Undecanoic acid, 10-methyl-, methyl ester C13H26O2 28.197 74.00 6.294 Phytol C20H40O 32.134 71.00 12.015 1,2-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis (2-methylpropyl) ester C16H22O4 26.554 149.00 16.667 -
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
-
About this article
Cite this article
Sultana MS, Azad MAK, Shimizu N, Rana GMM, Yeasmin MS. 2024. Efficacy of aqueous extracts from three plants in controlling cabbage aphid [Brevicoryne brassicae L. (Hemiptera: Aphididae)] on field-grown cabbage (Brassica oleraceae L.). Technology in Horticulture 4: e025 doi: 10.48130/tihort-0024-0022
Efficacy of aqueous extracts from three plants in controlling cabbage aphid [Brevicoryne brassicae L. (Hemiptera: Aphididae)] on field-grown cabbage (Brassica oleraceae L.)
- Received: 27 January 2024
- Revised: 05 September 2024
- Accepted: 09 September 2024
- Published online: 09 October 2024
Abstract: Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) crops are frequently attacked by aphids (Brevicoryne brassicae L.) which severely damage cabbage production. This research was conducted at an experimental cabbage field of the Institute of Environmental Science, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh, from 15 November 2020 to 14 February 2021. This study assessed the dose-dependent efficacy of aqueous extracts from the seed of jute (Corchorus capsularis L.), leaves of bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria Molina Standl.), and fruit peel of lemon (Citrus limon L. Osbeck), compared with the chemical insecticide Malathion. The experiment design was laid out in a randomized complete block design (RCBD) with three replications. One-way (ANOVA) analysis was performed on the acquired data and significant differences among treatments were detected using Duncan's Multiple Range Test (p < 0.05). This study revealed that bottle gourd leaf extract at 10% and 20% (w/v) concentrations resulted in high biopesticide activity against aphids and increased cabbage yield by 12%–13%, compared with the control. The application of 30% (w/v) bottle gourd leaf extract significantly decreased aphid infestation by 28.26% and 46.83% at 45 and 60 DAT, respectively in field-grown cabbage and led to a 30.95% increase in cabbage yield compared with the Malathion. Thirteen potential chemical components of the bottle gourd leaf extract were identified using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis that may possess the insecticidal ability. Results indicated that bottle gourd leaf extract has great potential as an alternative to synthetic chemical pesticides in controlling aphids in cabbage in an environmentally friendly way.
-
Key words:
- Plant extracts /
- Aphid /
- Cabbage /
- Bottle gourd leaves /
- GC-MS